Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #766 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 17-08-2006, 09:52 AM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 692
Default Where's everybody gone?

"chico chupacabra" wrote in message ...
pearl wrote:

"Leif Erikson" wrote in message
ink.net...
pearl wrote:

"Leif Erikson" wrote in message
nk.net...

pearl wrote:
..

They are.

They aren't, lesley. The hijackers are all dead. Some
accomplices who didn't board the planes may be alive,
but the hijackers are all dead. No one survived any of
the plane crashes.


'Hijackers Alive And Well

No, they are not. The hijackers all died in the
crashes. Some plotters may be alive, but the hijackers
are all dead. No one survived the crashes.


Some of the people named as hijackers are still alive.


Certain names are very common in various parts of the world, but that
doesn't mean the hijackers are alive and well. They're all dead.


And "fire brought down the WTC".

"Ineptitude, confusion and perhaps ... deception. INCORRECT
TESTIMONY ... REPEATED MIS-STATEMENTS ... ALL OF
THE AFTER ACTION REPORTS .... ADVANCED AN ACCOUNT
OF 9/11 THAT WAS UNTRUE. ... WEREN'T FORTHCOMING
WITH INFORMATION ... DIDN'T TELL THE TRUTH ... THE
FACT THAT THEY WOULD CONTINUE AND PERPETUATE
THE LIE SUGGESTS THAT WE NEED A FULL INVESTIGATION
OF WHAT IS GOING ON .....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahv3VdknyZ4






  #767 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 17-08-2006, 09:55 AM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 692
Default Where's everybody gone?

"chico chupacabra" wrote in message ...
pearl wrote:

...dead.

No.

Yes.


No.


Yes.


No.

And the response to why large objects, like buildings, fall
straight down doesn't change: gravity.


Only if the support is broken at multiple points throughout the
height of the three (3) structures. There were 47 huge central
steel support columns embedded within concrete (and with an
external layer of insulation) in WTC 1 & 2, and 24 in WTC 7.

We know that:

'The WTC, on this low-wind day, was likely not stressed more than
a third of the design allowable, which is roughly one-fifth of the yield
strength of the steel. Even with its strength halved, the steel could still
support two to three times the stresses imposed by a 650C fire.'
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM...agar-0112.html

So what went wrong, 'chico'? Tell us how you think it happened.

WELL?






  #768 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 17-08-2006, 09:57 AM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 692
Default Where's everybody gone?

"chico chupacabra" wrote in message ...
Lesley, who flunked out of engineering school


No, as you have been informed repeatedly, fool.

...Let's see you address this:


G-R-A-V-I-T-Y. It's why objects fall to earth. Dipshit.


Only if the support is broken at multiple points throughout the
height of the three (3) structures. There were 47 huge central
steel support columns embedded within concrete (and with an
external layer of insulation) in WTC 1 & 2, and 24 in WTC 7.

We know that:

'The WTC, on this low-wind day, was likely not stressed more than
a third of the design allowable, which is roughly one-fifth of the yield
strength of the steel. Even with its strength halved, the steel could still
support two to three times the stresses imposed by a 650C fire.'
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM...agar-0112.html

So what went wrong, 'chico'? Tell us how you think it happened.

WELL?




  #769 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 17-08-2006, 09:59 AM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,soc.culture.usa,uk.business.agriculture,uk.politics.animals
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 692
Default Where's everybody gone?

"chico chupacabra" wrote in message ...

[BS]

This is still awaiting an answer, traitor:

'The WTC, on this low-wind day, was likely not stressed more than
a third of the design allowable, which is roughly one-fifth of the yield
strength of the steel. Even with its strength halved, the steel could still
support two to three times the stresses imposed by a 650C fire.'
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM...agar-0112.html

So what went wrong, 'chico'? Tell us how you think it happened.

WELL?




  #770 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 17-08-2006, 10:14 AM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 692
Default Where's everybody gone?

"Leif Erikson" wrote in message ink.net...
pearl wrote:

"Leif Erikson" wrote in message ink.net...

pearl wrote:

"Leif Erikson" wrote in message ink.net...


pearl wrote:



"Leif Erikson" wrote in message ink.net...



pearl wrote:




"Leif Erikson" wrote in message nk.net...

pearl wrote:
..

They are.

They aren't, lesley. The hijackers are all dead. Some
accomplices who didn't board the planes may be alive,
but the hijackers are all dead. No one survived any of
the plane crashes.


'Hijackers Alive And Well

No, they are not. The hijackers all died in the
crashes. Some plotters may be alive, but the hijackers
are all dead. No one survived the crashes.


Some of the people named as hijackers are still alive.

Then either there are multiple people with the same
names - do a Google search on "Eddie Johnson" for an
unfortunate recent incident of mistaken identity,


Read what you snipped:

'Hijackers Alive And Well

[snip


As expected.


Because it's not what I want to believe.


Poor self-deluded, gullible dupe.

"Ineptitude, confusion and perhaps ... deception. INCORRECT
TESTIMONY ... REPEATED MIS-STATEMENTS ... ALL OF
THE AFTER ACTION REPORTS .... ADVANCED AN ACCOUNT
OF 9/11 THAT WAS UNTRUE. ... WEREN'T FORTHCOMING
WITH INFORMATION ... DIDN'T TELL THE TRUTH ... THE
FACT THAT THEY WOULD CONTINUE AND PERPETUATE
THE LIE SUGGESTS THAT WE NEED A FULL INVESTIGATION
OF WHAT IS GOING ON .....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahv3VdknyZ4

"pearl" wrote in message ...

"chico chupacabra" wrote in message ...

pearl wrote:


The buildings COMPLETELY COLLAPSED in VIRTUAL FREE FALL
into their own footprint. How does weakened / softened STEEL do that?

Answer the question,

And before you say "gravity" again,

It's why things fall straight down, Lesley.

Only if the support is broken at multiple points throughout the
height of the three (3) structures. There were 47 huge central
steel support columns embedded within concrete (and with an
external layer of insulation) in WTC 1 & 2, and 24 in WTC 7.

We know that:

'The WTC, on this low-wind day, was likely not stressed more than
a third of the design allowable, which is roughly one-fifth of the yield
strength of the steel. Even with its strength halved, the steel could still
support two to three times the stresses imposed by a 650C fire.'
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM...agar-0112.html


Not expert analysis.


That's the best you can come up with? Show otherwise.






  #771 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 17-08-2006, 01:30 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 353
Default Where's everybody gone?

pearl wrote:

..

They are.

They aren't, lesley. The hijackers are all dead. Some
accomplices who didn't board the planes may be alive,
but the hijackers are all dead. No one survived any of
the plane crashes.


'Hijackers Alive And Well

No, they are not. The hijackers all died in the
crashes. Some plotters may be alive, but the hijackers
are all dead. No one survived the crashes.

Some of the people named as hijackers are still alive.


Certain names are very common in various parts of the world, but that
doesn't mean the hijackers are alive and well. They're all dead.


And "fire brought down the WTC".


Gravity did; the fire only weakened the steel, dumbass.
  #772 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 17-08-2006, 01:37 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 353
Default Where's everybody gone?

pearl wrote:

...dead.

No.

Yes.

No.


Yes.


No.


Yes. They're all dead.

And the response to why large objects, like buildings, fall
straight down doesn't change: gravity.


Only if


....gravity works. It does. That's why it came down, you incompetent
little foot-rubbing slut.
  #773 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 17-08-2006, 01:41 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 353
Default Where's everybody gone?

Lesley, who flunked out of engineering school, wrote:

Lesley, who flunked out of engineering school


No


Yes. You've demonstrated an abject failure to apply to most elementary
principles of mathematics. That's because you never grasped those
principles in the first place.

...Let's see you address this:


G-R-A-V-I-T-Y. It's why objects fall to earth. Dipshit.


Only if


It was gravity. Not UFOs with enlightened beings from beneath Mount
Shasta, not remote control jumbo jets, not a mystery man on a grassy knoll.
  #774 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 17-08-2006, 01:43 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,soc.culture.usa,uk.business.agriculture,uk.politics.animals
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 353
Default Where's everybody gone?

Lesley, who flunked out of engineering school, wrote:

[BS]


It's your specialty.

This is still


Gravity. It's why stuff falls to earth, dummy. Not UFOs, not hollow
earth, not secret societies beneath Mount Shasta, not foot massage, not
remote control jumbo jets, not someone on a grassy knoll. Just gravity,
you rabid bitch.
  #775 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 17-08-2006, 02:33 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 105
Default Cyber-worlds?

Goo, the inept idiot who is obsessed with accusing others of child rape
wrote:
They are nothing more than a group chat.


False. They aren't like chat at all. YOU treat them
like chat, because you're inconsequential and have
nothing meaningful to say.


I can't believe you're arguing this point. You are willing to latch on
to ANYTHING to argue about.

Chat is real-time; synchronous. You see some small
outburst of what someone has said, and you - you
particularly - blurt out some inanity in reply. Usenet
is different. It is asynchronous. You see the
entirety of someone's post, and you can pick and choose
which parts of it to address. There may be - although
never with yours - more complete thoughts expressed.

As usual, you'll argue, no matter how badly wrong
you're shown to be.


I'm not wrong. These groups are indeed a form of chat, no matter how
time-delayed your chatting abilities.

Scented Nectar
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/



  #776 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 17-08-2006, 02:42 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 353
Default Cyber-worlds?

Skanky, 46 year-old bus-riding wastrel who wastes time and money
"whispering and sending "telegrams" in loser chatrooms and then drags
her lazy ass to Usenet and thinks it's also chat (but it's NOT), wrote:

They are nothing more than a group chat.


False. They aren't like chat at all. YOU treat them
like chat, because you're inconsequential and have
nothing meaningful to say.


I can't believe


You're the one being argumentative about this. Chat and Usenet are not
the same thing. They're completely distinct.

Chat is real-time; synchronous. You see some small
outburst of what someone has said, and you - you
particularly - blurt out some inanity in reply. Usenet
is different. It is asynchronous. You see the
entirety of someone's post, and you can pick and choose
which parts of it to address. There may be - although
never with yours - more complete thoughts expressed.

As usual, you'll argue, no matter how badly wrong
you're shown to be.


I'm not wrong.


Yes, you are (as usual). Newsgroups are specifically defined hierarchies
of topical repositories within Usenet. Usenet is *not* chat.

Chat, whether IRC, instant messaging, or some similar means of real-time
communication, is entirely different in method, design, scope, etc.,
from newsgroups (Usenet).

These groups are indeed


These groups are Usenet, NOT chat. Dummy.
  #777 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 17-08-2006, 02:49 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 105
Default Cyber-worlds?

cheeko upchuck wrote:
Chat and Usenet are not
the same thing. They're completely distinct.


People converse - both. People reply - both. Looks, smells, and
tastes like chatting to me.

Newsgroups are specifically defined hierarchies
of topical repositories within Usenet. Usenet is *not* chat.

Chat, whether IRC, instant messaging, or some similar means of real-time
communication, is entirely different in method, design, scope, etc.,
from newsgroups (Usenet).


So let me get this straight. You are violently opposed to real-time
chat, yet you consider these usenet groups to be very good and
different because the chat is in delayed time. You're ****ed, Upchuck.

Scented Nectar
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/

  #778 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 17-08-2006, 03:14 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 353
Default Cyber-worlds?

Skanky, self-marginalized and passivist 46 year-old bus-riding wastrel
who wastes time and money "whispering and sending "telegrams" in loser
chatrooms and then drags her lazy ass to Usenet and thinks it's also
chat (but it's NOT), wrote:

So let me get this straight.


You never get anything straight. Maybe try comprehending it when you're
sober and have had your afternoon nap. You're not doing a very good job
of it now. Then again, I doubt sobriety or "rest" (when are you NOT
resting?) will be of any benefit, jellyhead.

You are violently


I'm not violent, jellyhead. Your abuse of the English language, though, is.
  #779 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 17-08-2006, 03:21 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 60
Default Where's everybody gone?

pearl wrote:

"Leif Erikson" wrote in message ink.net...

pearl wrote:


"Leif Erikson" wrote in message ink.net...


pearl wrote:


"Leif Erikson" wrote in message ink.net...



pearl wrote:




"Leif Erikson" wrote in message ink.net...




pearl wrote:





"Leif Erikson" wrote in message nk.net...

pearl wrote:
..

They are.

They aren't, lesley. The hijackers are all dead. Some
accomplices who didn't board the planes may be alive,
but the hijackers are all dead. No one survived any of
the plane crashes.


'Hijackers Alive And Well

No, they are not. The hijackers all died in the
crashes. Some plotters may be alive, but the hijackers
are all dead. No one survived the crashes.


Some of the people named as hijackers are still alive.

Then either there are multiple people with the same
names - do a Google search on "Eddie Johnson" for an
unfortunate recent incident of mistaken identity,


Read what you snipped:

'Hijackers Alive And Well

[snip

As expected.


Because it's a massive steaming load of BULLSHIT that is indicative of your tendency to believe in irrational, STUPID things.



Poor self-deluded, gullible dupe lesley.

[bullshit]


The hijackers are all dead.




"pearl" wrote in message ...


"chico chupacabra" wrote in message ...


pearl wrote:



The buildings COMPLETELY COLLAPSED in VIRTUAL FREE FALL
into their own footprint. How does weakened / softened STEEL do that?

Answer the question,

And before you say "gravity" again,

It's why things fall straight down, Lesley.

Only if the support is broken at multiple points throughout the
height of the three (3) structures. There were 47 huge central
steel support columns embedded within concrete (and with an
external layer of insulation) in WTC 1 & 2, and 24 in WTC 7.

We know that:

'The WTC, on this low-wind day, was likely not stressed more than
a third of the design allowable, which is roughly one-fifth of the yield
strength of the steel. Even with its strength halved, the steel could still
support two to three times the stresses imposed by a 650C fire.'
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM...agar-0112.html


Not expert analysis.



That's the best


Right.
  #780 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 17-08-2006, 03:28 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 60
Default Cyber-worlds?

Skanky the 43-46 year old wasted wastrel pot-head
dipshit carless child rapist blabbered:

Leif Erikson set the record straight:

Skanky the 43-46 year old wasted wastrel pot-head dipshit carless child rapist blabbered:


They are nothing more than a group chat.


False. They aren't like chat at all. YOU treat them
like chat, because you're inconsequential and have
nothing meaningful to say.



I can't believe you're arguing this point.


My statement is correct.


Chat is real-time; synchronous. You see some small
outburst of what someone has said, and you - you
particularly - blurt out some inanity in reply. Usenet
is different. It is asynchronous. You see the
entirety of someone's post, and you can pick and choose
which parts of it to address. There may be - although
never with yours - more complete thoughts expressed.

As usual, you'll argue, no matter how badly wrong
you're shown to be.



I'm not wrong.


You *are* wrong, and as usual, you're stubborn about it.


These groups are indeed a form of chat,


False.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"

 

Copyright © 2017