"Leif Erikson" > wrote in message ink.net...
> pearl wrote:
>
> > "Leif Erikson" > wrote in message ink.net...
> >
> >>pearl wrote:
> >>
> >>>"Leif Erikson" > wrote in message ink.net...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>pearl wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>"Leif Erikson" > wrote in message ink.net...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>pearl wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>"Leif Erikson" > wrote in message nk.net...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>pearl wrote:
> >>>>>>><..>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>They are.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>They aren't, lesley. The hijackers are all dead. Some
> >>>>>>>>accomplices who didn't board the planes may be alive,
> >>>>>>>>but the hijackers are all dead. No one survived any of
> >>>>>>>>the plane crashes.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>'Hijackers Alive And Well
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>No, they are not. The hijackers all died in the
> >>>>>>crashes. Some plotters may be alive, but the hijackers
> >>>>>>are all dead. No one survived the crashes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Some of the people named as hijackers are still alive.
> >>>>
> >>>>Then either there are multiple people with the same
> >>>>names - do a Google search on "Eddie Johnson" for an
> >>>>unfortunate recent incident of mistaken identity,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Read what you snipped:
> >>>
> >>>'Hijackers Alive And Well
> >>
> >>[snip > >
> >
> > As expected.
>
> Because it's not what I want to believe.

Poor self-deluded, gullible dupe.

"Ineptitude, confusion and perhaps ... deception. INCORRECT
TESTIMONY ... REPEATED MIS-STATEMENTS ... ALL OF
THE AFTER ACTION REPORTS .... ADVANCED AN ACCOUNT
OF 9/11 THAT WAS UNTRUE. ... WEREN'T FORTHCOMING
WITH INFORMATION ... DIDN'T TELL THE TRUTH ... THE
FACT THAT THEY WOULD CONTINUE AND PERPETUATE
THE LIE SUGGESTS THAT WE NEED A FULL INVESTIGATION
OF WHAT IS GOING ON .....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahv3VdknyZ4

> > "pearl" > wrote in message ...
> >
> >>"chico chupacabra" > wrote in message ...
> >>
> >>>pearl wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>The buildings COMPLETELY COLLAPSED in VIRTUAL FREE FALL
> >>>>>>>into their own footprint. How does weakened / softened STEEL do that?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Answer the question,
> >>>>
> >>>>And before you say "gravity" again,
> >>>
> >>>It's why things fall straight down, Lesley.
> >>
> >>Only if the support is broken at multiple points throughout the
> >>height of the three (3) structures. There were 47 huge central
> >>steel support columns embedded within concrete (and with an
> >>external layer of insulation) in WTC 1 & 2, and 24 in WTC 7.
> >>
> >>We know that:
> >>
> >>'The WTC, on this low-wind day, was likely not stressed more than
> >>a third of the design allowable, which is roughly one-fifth of the yield
> >>strength of the steel. Even with its strength halved, the steel could still
> >>support two to three times the stresses imposed by a 650°C fire.'
> >>http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM...agar-0112.html
>
> Not expert analysis.

That's the best you can come up with? Show otherwise.