Ophelia wrote:

>> It's a personal choice and there's certainly nothing wrong with using
>> them
>> if one chooses to. They're there for a reason. :-)
>
> Quite so, but what does perplex me, is when someone who is in a kf changes
> something and a killfiler starts creating a big fuss about it.

....because if they had a real killfile they wouldn't even see it....

> I wonder if they expect the killfiled, to ask permission from the
> killfiler first!!!
>
> Such arrogant self importance takes my breath away ...

Lol.

Gary wrote:
> wrote:
>>
>> ... when I download the message headers it's quite clear what
>> the new nym is and it stops right there.
>
> Trouble is, this troll (or trolls) does often have some very good
> comments. Many are even educational or at least interesting to read.
> The person(s) have been in rfc for a long time and know everyone well
> enough.
>
> The good posts are just as good as anyone else's here. It's just the
> floods of worthless posts that keep me from responding most times.
> He/she is NOT doing this group any favors by that nonsense.

This group is doing itself NO favors by continuing to domicile Marty and
Sqwerty.

And by endorsing bullying.

> He/she is ALSO not getting read by most people here due to the
> nonsense posts, so the good posts are not even seen here.
>
> G.

Those who matter do read.

Those who claim alleged killfiles tend to be the nexus of the bullying
problem anyway.

Xeno wrote:

>> He/she is ALSO not getting read by most people here due to the
>> nonsense posts, so the good posts are not even seen here.
>>
>> G.
>>
> Precisely!
>
_yawn_

Janet wrote:
>> those who whine the most about what others post are those who
>> >contribute the least useful information.
> Perfect summary of those three.
>
> Janet UK
>
>

Coming from a bully biotchlike you ...DISMISSED!

wrote:
>> He/she is ALSO not getting read by most people here due to the
>> >nonsense posts, so the good posts are not even seen here.
>> >
>> >G.
> Precisely, I'm not prepared to wade through 50 posts on the off chance

Oh sod you, biotch!

You care about your bullying and not much else, you used up old hag!

"Janet" > wrote in message
.. .
> In article >, gravesend10
> @verizon.net says...
>>
>> Cheri wrote:
>> >Bruce wrote in message
>> >>Ophelia wrote:
>
> What's ironic is that
>> those who whine the most about what others post are those who
>> contribute the least useful information.
>
> Perfect summary of those three.
>
> Janet UK

At least we deserve a summary, you on the other hand are not even worth that
you useless twit.

Cheri

Gary wrote:
> la voz del norte wrote:
>>
>> Otoh people like yourself, dsi1, Cheri, Ed, Cindy, and several others
>> here are, in the vernacular, meat space friendly.
>
> Are you kidding? SF picks on people all the time. She is not so nice
> often.

She does not bully, period.

She does express opinions, which is the point, right?

>>
>> I hadn't realized how rare that quality was until I spent significant
>> time in this group.
>>
>> I remain perplexed that food and bullying are inextricably linked here.
>
> This is RFC and it's well known as "indian country."

That's a tad racist.


> If everyone here
> posted nicely only about food all the time, this group would have died
> many years ago.

But why?

You're telling me that the only form of interaction that lasts is one
fraught with spite and bullying?

Wow.

Cynical, but perhaps true...

> Just look back at the last 200+ posts here and note
> how many are nice and polite and about food only.

Very few.

> Also look back at usenet and notice how all the nice and polite groups
> are dead now.

Tech and lifestyle choices are not static.

At some point Twitter will (mercifully) die off too.

Uselessnet exists because aging boomers remember its early days and are
generationally resistant to endless change.

It's like the guy with a closet full og 8 track tapes bemonaing CDs or
ignoring Pandora.

It's an anachronism on life support.

> This is an unmoderated group and that's a good thing. YOU show up and
> try to moderate it. NOT a good thing.

ONLY the bullying and Taliban-like sheltering of the "Groupkillas".

> You should post here responsibly
> and no more than that. People would welcome you here then.

I very seriously doubt it.

The ones that don't care for me know I've called them out and held them
accountable. For that there will be no forgiveness.

That's' the reality of it.


> What you have been doing here lately is only damaging the group.

I did post on topic to begin with and was immediately attacked by
BBQ-ruining Bodine and his pet dwarf.

Be real about what happened here.

The difference is, I fought back!

That's it.

> Not only that....you pick on people that yell at others here but you
> do the exact same thing to your select group of "victims." Hypocrite!

I've gone after only those who have malicious intent and practices.

I make ZERO apologies for that.

> Hey...this is Rome. You should do as us Romans do.
> This is indian country. Expect to have to dodge arrows occasionally.

That's one of the most tepid defenses I have yet read.

You're actually supporting a bullying status quo as if it were the ONLY
way for RFC to thrive.

How sad.

How depressing.

How self-serving.

Why not grow a pair and toss the "Groupkillas" and Julie-bashers right
out of here.

They offer little or no other value anyway.

Cheri wrote:
>>
>> You three deserve a spot in the nut house next to each other.
>>
>> --
>> Bruce
>
> Only in your flawed mind.
>
> Cheri


Bwucie is amply demonstrating his corrupt nature of late.

But I bet he could torch a school bus and Ms. O would still give him a
fawning pass.

Cheri wrote:
>>> those who whine the most about what others post are those who
>>> contribute the least useful information.
>>
>> Perfect summary of those three.
>>
>> Janet UK
>
> At least we deserve a summary, you on the other hand are not even worth
> that you useless twit.
>
> Cheri


+1000!!!!

On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 08:32:30 -0400, Gary > wrote:

wrote:
>>
>> ... when I download the message headers it's quite clear what
>> the new nym is and it stops right there.
>
>Trouble is, this troll (or trolls) does often have some very good
>comments. Many are even educational or at least interesting to read.
>The person(s) have been in rfc for a long time and know everyone well
>enough.
>
>The good posts are just as good as anyone else's here. It's just the
>floods of worthless posts that keep me from responding most times.
>He/she is NOT doing this group any favors by that nonsense.
>
>He/she is ALSO not getting read by most people here due to the
>nonsense posts, so the good posts are not even seen here.
>
>G.

The Sock Puppet troll is plaguing this thread! :-(

John Kuthe...

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Janet" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> In article >, gravesend10
>> @verizon.net says...
>>>
>>> Cheri wrote:
>>> >Bruce wrote in message
>>> >>Ophelia wrote:
>>
>> What's ironic is that
>>> those who whine the most about what others post are those who
>>> contribute the least useful information.
>>
>> Perfect summary of those three.
>>
>> Janet UK
>
> At least we deserve a summary, you on the other hand are not even worth
> that you useless twit.

You mean the useless twit who boasts all the time ??? LOL

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

John Kuthe wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 08:32:30 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> ... when I download the message headers it's quite clear what
>>> the new nym is and it stops right there.
>>
>> Trouble is, this troll (or trolls) does often have some very good
>> comments. Many are even educational or at least interesting to read.
>> The person(s) have been in rfc for a long time and know everyone well
>> enough.
>>
>> The good posts are just as good as anyone else's here. It's just the
>> floods of worthless posts that keep me from responding most times.
>> He/she is NOT doing this group any favors by that nonsense.
>>
>> He/she is ALSO not getting read by most people here due to the
>> nonsense posts, so the good posts are not even seen here.
>>
>> G.
>
> The Sock Puppet troll is plaguing this thread! :-(
>
> John Kuthe...
>

OMG, your concern is "this thread"???

I mean as opposed to the 24/7 bullying here and the sheltering of the
"Groupkillas"?

Just so we get your priorities accurately portrayed, eh Cooty?

Ophelia wrote:
>>> Perfect summary of those three.
>>>
>>> Janet UK
>>
>> At least we deserve a summary, you on the other hand are not even
>> worth that you useless twit.
>
> You mean the useless twit who boasts all the time ??? LOL
>
> --


Who, Bwucie?

"la voz del norte" > wrote in message
...
> John Kuthe wrote:
>> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 08:32:30 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ... when I download the message headers it's quite clear what
>>>> the new nym is and it stops right there.
>>>
>>> Trouble is, this troll (or trolls) does often have some very good
>>> comments. Many are even educational or at least interesting to read.
>>> The person(s) have been in rfc for a long time and know everyone well
>>> enough.
>>>
>>> The good posts are just as good as anyone else's here. It's just the
>>> floods of worthless posts that keep me from responding most times.
>>> He/she is NOT doing this group any favors by that nonsense.
>>>
>>> He/she is ALSO not getting read by most people here due to the
>>> nonsense posts, so the good posts are not even seen here.
>>>
>>> G.
>>
>> The Sock Puppet troll is plaguing this thread! :-(
>>
>> John Kuthe...
>>
>
> OMG, your concern is "this thread"???
>
> I mean as opposed to the 24/7 bullying here and the sheltering of the
> "Groupkillas"?
>
> Just so we get your priorities accurately portrayed, eh Cooty?

JK is like chicken little with the "sky is falling, the sky is falling"
posts.

Cheri

Cheri wrote:

>>> The Sock Puppet troll is plaguing this thread! :-(
>>>
>>> John Kuthe...
>>>
>>
>> OMG, your concern is "this thread"???
>>
>> I mean as opposed to the 24/7 bullying here and the sheltering of the
>> "Groupkillas"?
>>
>> Just so we get your priorities accurately portrayed, eh Cooty?
>
> JK is like chicken little with the "sky is falling, the sky is falling"
> posts.
>
> Cheri


That he is.

And trying to engage him in some rational thinking and critical dialog
is just as fruitless.

wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 18:26:28 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
> >
> > I don't know why you are so nasty to so many folks here but it
> > seems to suit you and when you are reasonable, I talk with you. If
> > you have a problem with a member, do what i do. Take it up with
> > them direct. Dont play proxy games.
> >
> > Carol
>
> You are nuts. I have NEVER told you who you can or cannot post to - I
> certainly would never want to be in the least like you! I took the
> matter of Sheldons dirty mouth up with you, that is direct, you were
> the one saying 'Oh he doesn't mean that, you just don't understand
> him' blah blah blah. So yes, when as usual he spewed more filth, I
> pointed it out to you.
>
> "Proxy games" - lol - as I said, you've got bats in the belfry.

You have ISSUES. Every time Sheldon posts something YOU do not like,
you bring it up to me as if i were involved. Get over it. If you have
a problem with something he posts, YOU TAKE IT TO HIM ok? I am not
your Mommie to deal with a bad brother's behavior and that is how you
have been treating me, up to and including a ping to point up a message
you felt I should have to deal with from Sheldon.

Carol

--

Xeno wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> "cshenk" > wrote:
> > Janet wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> In article >,
> >> says...
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 18:28:00 -0500, "cshenk" >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 17:35:58 -0400, Dave Smith
> >>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2015-08-30 5:29 PM, cshenk wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sheldon, there arent many of us who put up with your flat out
> >>>>> creapy >> bad behavior. If you were in the miltary now, you'd
> be >>>>> tossed out on >> your ass so fast you wouldnt even know it
> was >>> the >> pavement that hit you >> before you blacked out.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> There is no excuse for some of the things you have posted in
> >>> the >> last 2 >> days and you know it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> Tourette's.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> More likely alcohol -
> >>>>
> >>>> There's no reason to assume his alcohol consumption is higher
> >>>> than an average person. He seems to like a little vodka with
> >>>> juice.
> >>>>
> >>>> It could be I exceed him when I sip a six pack over 12 hours.
> >>>> Golly gee, sometimes a whole 12 pack in 12 hours!
> >>>>
> >>>> Carol
> >>>
> >>> There you go, excusing his potty mouth again. However I
> understand >>> it doesn't bother you, you like it for some reason.
> >>
> >> ?????????????? Have you lost the plot? Far from excusing or
> >> approving him, Carol just slammed Sheldon (requoted in your own
> >> post, and again above) with
> >>
> >> "Sheldon, there arent many of us who put up with your flat out
> >> creapy bad behavior. If you were in the miltary now, you'd be
> >> tossed out on your ass so fast you wouldnt even know it was the
> >> pavement that hit you before you blacked out.
> >>
> >> There is no excuse for some of the things you have posted in the
> >> last 2 days and you know it"
> >>
> >>
> >> Janet UK
> >
> > Thank you Janet. I am getting tired of lucretiaborgia trying to
> > tell me who I can read, who I can reply to, and implying things
> > that are not true. It's like she seems to think I'm at his
> > keyboard helping him post she objects to or something?
> >
> > I like the freedom here. I do killfile obvious trolls, but not
> > actual members. I even figured out how to pull Julie out of my
> > killfile (it was a little hidden) and did that this week. She's
> > the only real person to ever land in there and I needed a break
> > because she was taking up so much of my time, I wasn't replying to
> > others messages.
> >
> > Carol
> >
> > --
>
> Say what you will about Julie but she does seem to generate a number
> of interesting threads. Sure, she may drift onto some path you're not
> happy with but, instead of turning it into a "bash Julie" session,
> feel free to stop responding or steer the thread in a different
> direction. Surely that is the best path to follow?

Yup, that's what I did for a bit. I pulled her messages out until I
was calm and easy about it all. Now I'm chatting with her again.

She's never going to accept any advice and now i know to not spend 4
hours looking up answers for a quandry she has. Thats sad as i like
helping people but if she will never accept any answer, then there is
little to be done.

Carol

--

tert in seattle wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> cshenk wrote:
> > sf wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 09:42:27 -0500, "cshenk" >
> wrote: >>
> >> > Brooklyn1 wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >> >
> >> > > tert in seattle wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > http://www.ftupet.com/upload/dinner20150827.jpg
> >> > > >
> >> > > > it tasted much better than it looks in this picture
> >> > >
> >> > > Yuck... why not post a picture of your dumpster diving dinner
> in >> > > your crapper just prior to flushing, would look more
> >> > > appetizing... what a gross POS you are... a mentally sane
> person >> > > would post a picture of their dinner before it was
> attacked by a >> > > famished freak. you didn't cook that anyway,
> it's the LOs from a >> > > resto doggie bag.
> >> >
> >> > Sheldon, get a life ok? The food looked pretty good to me! I
> have >> > no issues at all with a plate of what is left to show a
> really nice >> > fun meal.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Sheldon demonstrated once again why people don't post pictures
> here.
> >
> > Plenty of folks still post pictures of everyday foods. You just
> > need to ignore the stupid replies.
> >
> > I liked Tert's use of panko but am not clear on the application they
> > used and the spicing added. I am making a rough guess that it's an
> > egg dip then chives or parsley (or both) mixed with some panko and
> > the meat was rolled in it after the egg wash.
> >
> > Humm? Carol
>
> you guessed right but those dark things aren't chives or parsely -
> they're just burned crumbs of the breading

LOL! Ok! Looked good either way!

I'm big into using spices (with a light hand depending on what it is
and the effect i want).

Carol

--

tert in seattle wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> cshenk wrote:
> > wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 17:35:58 -0400, Dave Smith
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 2015-08-30 5:29 PM, cshenk wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Sheldon, there arent many of us who put up with your flat out
> >> creapy >> bad behavior. If you were in the miltary now, you'd be
> >> tossed out on >> your ass so fast you wouldnt even know it was the
> >> pavement that hit you >> before you blacked out.
> >> > >
> >> >> There is no excuse for some of the things you have posted in the
> >> last 2 >> days and you know it.
> >> > >
> >> > Tourette's.
> >>
> >> More likely alcohol -
> >
> > There's no reason to assume his alcohol consumption is higher than
> > an average person. He seems to like a little vodka with juice.
> >
> > It could be I exceed him when I sip a six pack over 12 hours. Golly
> > gee, sometimes a whole 12 pack in 12 hours!
> >
> > Carol
>
>
> People used to drink a lot more than they do now. Sheldon is like 100
> years old or something. My guess is that he puts away somewhere
> between 1 and 1.5 L per day. I could be on the low end depending on
> how advanced things have got.

Grin, he's not that old but a reasonable guess is he is in his 80's now
possibly. Since he seems partial to vodka, doubt he puts away that
much a day. I suspect more like 1L every 2 weeks? Mixed with juices
or sodas if I read it right over time.

Carol

--

On 9/4/2015 10:53 AM, Gary wrote:
> la voz del norte wrote:
>>
>> Otoh people like yourself, dsi1, Cheri, Ed, Cindy, and several others
>> here are, in the vernacular, meat space friendly.
>
> Are you kidding? SF picks on people all the time. She is not so nice
> often.
>
>
>>
>> I hadn't realized how rare that quality was until I spent significant
>> time in this group.
>>
>> I remain perplexed that food and bullying are inextricably linked here.
>
> This is RFC and it's well known as "indian country."

Actually, it's long been known as 'The Chaotic Kitchen". I started
reading/posting here around 1997 and things were just as nuts then as
they are now. Only the characters have changed. There are always
trolls and spammers, you just have to figure out how to killfile.

Some of us do actually talk about cooking.

OB Food: I've been on a bit of a soft taco kick for lunch this past
month. No problems with the flour tortillas being stuck together like
KenK experienced.

Jill

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 20:03:02 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>
>"sf" > wrote in message
.. .
>
>> You aren't part of the crowd that calls people who use kill files
>> names either.
>
>I can't imagine why people would care what others do with their killfiles.
>It's a personal choice and there's certainly nothing wrong with using them
>if one chooses to. They're there for a reason. :-)

All those who post about their killfiles most certainly care... hardly
a week passes that sf doesn't boast about her killfile, about who's in
it, urge others to use killfiles, and most especially who to killfile.
Boasting about who's in her killfille sf demonstrates the same level
of classiness her husband would demonstrate boasting about how she
gives great BJs... both are topics normal people STFU about because
they are not going to prove it.

cshenk wrote:
> tert in seattle wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> cshenk wrote:
>> > sf wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 09:42:27 -0500, "cshenk" >
>> wrote: >>
>> >> > Brooklyn1 wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >> >
>> >> > > tert in seattle wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > http://www.ftupet.com/upload/dinner20150827.jpg
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > it tasted much better than it looks in this picture
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Yuck... why not post a picture of your dumpster diving dinner
>> in >> > > your crapper just prior to flushing, would look more
>> >> > > appetizing... what a gross POS you are... a mentally sane
>> person >> > > would post a picture of their dinner before it was
>> attacked by a >> > > famished freak. you didn't cook that anyway,
>> it's the LOs from a >> > > resto doggie bag.
>> >> >
>> >> > Sheldon, get a life ok? The food looked pretty good to me! I
>> have >> > no issues at all with a plate of what is left to show a
>> really nice >> > fun meal.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Sheldon demonstrated once again why people don't post pictures
>> here.
>> >
>> > Plenty of folks still post pictures of everyday foods. You just
>> > need to ignore the stupid replies.
>> >
>> > I liked Tert's use of panko but am not clear on the application they
>> > used and the spicing added. I am making a rough guess that it's an
>> > egg dip then chives or parsley (or both) mixed with some panko and
>> > the meat was rolled in it after the egg wash.
>> >
>> > Humm? Carol
>>
>> you guessed right but those dark things aren't chives or parsely -
>> they're just burned crumbs of the breading
>
> LOL! Ok! Looked good either way!
>
> I'm big into using spices (with a light hand depending on what it is
> and the effect i want).
>
> Carol

I'm big into using what I have in the kitchen at the time!

On 2015-09-04, jmcquown > wrote:

> Some of us do actually talk about cooking.

Testify!!

> OB Food: I've been on a bit of a soft taco kick for lunch this past
> month. No problems with the flour tortillas being stuck together like
> KenK experienced.

Not sure yer meaning. "No problems" cuz yuv never experienced the
sticking together of flour tortillas or "No problems" cuz you
correctly use corn tortillas, instead?

Soft tacos, traditionally, have been two small corn tortillas,
pre-prepped by deep/pan frying in oil till "soft" n' warm, then served
back-to-back filled with ordered meat plus minced onions n' cilantro.
At least that is how I've been served soft tacos in traditional San
Jose (CA) taquerías.

nb

On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 09:10:43 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>
>
> "Cheri" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "sf" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >> You aren't part of the crowd that calls people who use kill files
> >> names either.
> >
> > I can't imagine why people would care what others do with their killfiles.
> > It's a personal choice and there's certainly nothing wrong with using them
> > if one chooses to. They're there for a reason. :-)
>
> Quite so, but what does perplex me, is when someone who is in a kf changes
> something and a killfiler starts creating a big fuss about it.
>
> I wonder if they expect the killfiled, to ask permission from the killfiler
> first!!!
>
> Such arrogant self importance takes my breath away ...

Makes you wonder if they need to write new code instead of just press
a button to make the nymshifter go away again.

--

sf

On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 08:55:17 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

> I wonder if it something to do with it
> being made in the slow cooker or the mix of cheeses?

My vote is with the cheeses.

--

sf

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 08:55:17 +0100, "Ophelia" >
> wrote:
>
>> I wonder if it something to do with it
>> being made in the slow cooker or the mix of cheeses?
>
> My vote is with the cheeses.

Whatever it is, it seems to be a hit! But you've seen it. It doesn't look
so good, but there ya go!

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 08:32:30 -0400, Gary > wrote:

> He/she is ALSO not getting read by most people here due to the
> nonsense posts, so the good posts are not even seen here.

Tru dat, but it seems like he would have weighed the consequences.

--

sf

On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 12:44:08 -0700, sf > wrote:

>On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 08:32:30 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>
>> He/she is ALSO not getting read by most people here due to the
>> nonsense posts, so the good posts are not even seen here.
>
>Tru dat, but it seems like he would have weighed the consequences.

Hard to do when you're wrapped up in your own mental illness!! ;-)

John Kuthe...

On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:31:04 -0500, John Kuthe >
wrote:
>
> You got it, MartyB!
>
> Just asnother mentally ill individual with a lot of time on their
> hands and an Internet connection.
>
Which makes three of you.


--

sf

On 2015-09-04 12:58, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:31:04 -0500, John Kuthe >
> wrote:
>>
>> You got it, MartyB!
>>
>> Just asnother mentally ill individual with a lot of time on their
>> hands and an Internet connection.
>>
> Which makes three of you.
>

Some of us have our quirks, but there are some seriously disturbed
individuals in here. Daily nymshifting?? That is a person admitting
that they are a complete loser and, worse, unable to deal with the problem.

cshenk wrote:

>>> Let the WORLD know that you are one sick and twisted piece of BBQ
>>> ruining. group-killing, manipulative, sociopathic troll-art, Jethro.
>>>
>>> It doesn't come any nuttier than YOU.
>>
>> He gets meaner and meaner as more time passes without getting his way.
>
> Yeah, I'm a bit worried about his own health with all that inside.
> Hopefully we are just an outlet he needs to use and it keeps him sane
> in the rest of his life if he vents here.
>
> Carol
>

Interesting premise, perhaps sound too.

I don't think he's actually killed any BBQ judges yet, but you never know...

tert in seattle wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> cshenk wrote:
> > tert in seattle wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> cshenk wrote:
> >> > sf wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >> >
> >> >> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 09:42:27 -0500, "cshenk" >
> >> wrote: >>
> >> >> > Brooklyn1 wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > tert in seattle wrote:
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > http://www.ftupet.com/upload/dinner20150827.jpg
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > it tasted much better than it looks in this picture
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Yuck... why not post a picture of your dumpster diving
> dinner >> in >> > > your crapper just prior to flushing, would look
> more >> >> > > appetizing... what a gross POS you are... a mentally
> sane >> person >> > > would post a picture of their dinner before it
> was >> attacked by a >> > > famished freak. you didn't cook that
> anyway, >> it's the LOs from a >> > > resto doggie bag.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Sheldon, get a life ok? The food looked pretty good to me! I
> >> have >> > no issues at all with a plate of what is left to show a
> >> really nice >> > fun meal.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Sheldon demonstrated once again why people don't post pictures
> >> here.
> >> >
> >> > Plenty of folks still post pictures of everyday foods. You just
> >> > need to ignore the stupid replies.
> >> >
> >> > I liked Tert's use of panko but am not clear on the application
> they >> > used and the spicing added. I am making a rough guess that
> it's an >> > egg dip then chives or parsley (or both) mixed with some
> panko and >> > the meat was rolled in it after the egg wash.
> >> >
> >> > Humm? Carol
> >>
> >> you guessed right but those dark things aren't chives or parsely -
> >> they're just burned crumbs of the breading
> >
> > LOL! Ok! Looked good either way!
> >
> > I'm big into using spices (with a light hand depending on what it is
> > and the effect i want).
> >
> > Carol
>
> I'm big into using what I have in the kitchen at the time!

Same here. I have lots of odd bits about all the time.

I just started something new to me, shepards pie. It may be very
familar to others but today Charlotte and i wandered a cook book for a
ground beef idea and that one seemed right.

It seems you do not drain the ground beef (yes, a ground beef version).
It looks like they are trying to make it's own gravy with that fat.
Since i'm using very lean GB, I'm ok with that.

This recipe calls for Beef broth which isn't handy but many others use
beef gravy which is, so a little swap there.

It's doing it's thing. Later, we top with the potatoes we cooked up
and mashed.


--

wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 12:25:47 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
> > wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 18:26:28 -0500, "cshenk" >
> wrote: >>
> >> >
> >> > I don't know why you are so nasty to so many folks here but it
> >> > seems to suit you and when you are reasonable, I talk with you.
> If >> > you have a problem with a member, do what i do. Take it up
> with >> > them direct. Dont play proxy games.
> >> >
> >> > Carol
> >>
> >> You are nuts. I have NEVER told you who you can or cannot post to
> - I >> certainly would never want to be in the least like you! I
> took the >> matter of Sheldons dirty mouth up with you, that is
> direct, you were >> the one saying 'Oh he doesn't mean that, you just
> don't understand >> him' blah blah blah. So yes, when as usual he
> spewed more filth, I >> pointed it out to you.
> >>
> >> "Proxy games" - lol - as I said, you've got bats in the belfry.
> >
> > You have ISSUES. Every time Sheldon posts something YOU do not
> > like, you bring it up to me as if i were involved. Get over it.
> > If you have a problem with something he posts, YOU TAKE IT TO HIM
> > ok? I am not your Mommie to deal with a bad brother's behavior and
> > that is how you have been treating me, up to and including a ping
> > to point up a message you felt I should have to deal with from
> > Sheldon.
> >
> > Carol
>
> OK take this back to square one - he posted dirt - you giggled with
> him - I said at the time, glad it amuses you. Oh he doesn't do it
> often, you have the wrong opinion of him. Not so, he is filthy
> through and through.
>
> Move forward, a particularly bad post and I asked you if you really
> thought it was okay. That was the post I pinged you for, then you
> got your knickers knotted.
>
> THANK GOD YOU ARE NOT MY MOMMIE - I am greatly relieved my mother was
> nothing like you, she was a fantastic woman and I definitely would not
> have changed her for YOU - UCK ICH ACK PEWEY~

Please stop trying to tell me who I should talk with. If you don't
'get that' then you have issues. We all 'get it' that you have issues
with Sheldon. Stop bringing every issue you have with him to me as if I
were your Mommie and supposed to make it all better.

You are an adult. Act like one.

Carol

--

On 9/4/2015 11:49 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>
>>> I remain perplexed that food and bullying are inextricably linked here.
>>
>> This is RFC and it's well known as "indian country."
>
> Actually, it's long been known as 'The Chaotic Kitchen". I started
> reading/posting here around 1997 and things were just as nuts then as
> they are now. Only the characters have changed. There are always
> trolls and spammers, you just have to figure out how to killfile.


Let's be crystal clear here - YOU are a bully biotch, period.

You have been very much responsible for the "culture" of this group, and
you are an unsavory character at best.

On 9/4/2015 12:35 PM, wrote:
> I am greatly relieved my mother was
> nothing like you, she was a fantastic woman and I definitely would not
> have changed her for YOU - UCK ICH ACK PEWEY~


You're actually invoking your "mommy"?

LOL!

Priceless.

On 9/4/2015 1:44 PM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 08:32:30 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>
>> He/she is ALSO not getting read by most people here due to the
>> nonsense posts, so the good posts are not even seen here.
>
> Tru dat, but it seems like he would have weighed the consequences.

A perceptive lass you are.

It seems to have been forgotten that when I used 2 socks, one to flame
and the other to converse that I was attacked under both names
simultaneously.

The rampant and unrelenting frogging?

Yes, how selectively short some folks' memories are.

On 9/4/2015 1:55 PM, John Kuthe wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 12:44:08 -0700, sf > wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 08:32:30 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>>
>>> He/she is ALSO not getting read by most people here due to the
>>> nonsense posts, so the good posts are not even seen here.
>>
>> Tru dat, but it seems like he would have weighed the consequences.
>
> Hard to do when you're wrapped up in your own mental illness!! ;-)
>
> John Kuthe...
>


Do you think anyone here attaches even a morsel of credibility to your
rants now?

Not perhapa that they ever have, but you're far worse of late than
'normal'...

On 9/4/2015 1:58 PM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:31:04 -0500, John Kuthe >
> wrote:
>>
>> You got it, MartyB!
>>
>> Just asnother mentally ill individual with a lot of time on their
>> hands and an Internet connection.
>>
> Which makes three of you.
>
>
<GUFFAW!>

On 9/4/2015 2:30 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2015-09-04 12:58, sf wrote:
>> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:31:04 -0500, John Kuthe >
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> You got it, MartyB!
>>>
>>> Just asnother mentally ill individual with a lot of time on their
>>> hands and an Internet connection.
>>>
>> Which makes three of you.
>>
>
> Some of us have our quirks, but there are some seriously disturbed
> individuals in here.

Yes, the ones who actually STALK innocent women!

> Daily nymshifting?? That is a person admitting
> that they are a complete loser and, worse, unable to deal with the problem.


The "problem" is this group acting like the Taliban to shelter and
encourage flagrant abusers.

Dealing with it is ponderous and time-consuming, but it will be done.

On 9/4/2015 3:07 PM, cshenk wrote:
> Stop bringing every issue you have with him to me as if I
> were your Mommie and supposed to make it all better.
>
> You are an adult. Act like one.
>
> Carol
+1