Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ophelia" > wrote in message ... > > > "sf" > wrote in message > ... >> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 08:55:17 +0100, "Ophelia" > >> wrote: >> >>> I wonder if it something to do with it >>> being made in the slow cooker or the mix of cheeses? >> >> My vote is with the cheeses. > > Whatever it is, it seems to be a hit! But you've seen it. It doesn't > look so good, but there ya go! I think it looks fine, and as with any picture it doesn't tell you what it tastes like, so yours is a hit for you and dh and that's what counts. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/4/2015 3:46 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> He's just a Google Monkey at a keyboard. > > -sw Ah the jealousy consumes you and Jethro, lol! Here's a hint - NO ****ING MAYO! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/4/2015 3:53 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 12:57:56 -0700, sf wrote: > >> I've been amazed by the scope of your knowledge... which goes beyond >> links from the internet. > > Oh, PuhLEEASE <snork>. If it knew anything about cooking it would > have been contributing here years ago rather than waiting until a year > after he was harassing the regulars here. I didn't wait a year, you lying dwarf. I contributed immediately. > He just started Googling > cooking subjects to try and appease his marionettes. No why on earth would anyone do that? > Like money old women, you have no sense of logic at all and can't see > reality. She may like money, I know a lot of us do, so what is your point, dwarfy? > ObFood: My Nope. Deleted. **** off and die. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/4/2015 4:12 PM, cshenk wrote:
> wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:07:53 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: >> >>> wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>> >>>> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 12:25:47 -0500, "cshenk" > >> wrote: >> >>>>> wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 18:26:28 -0500, "cshenk" > >>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't know why you are so nasty to so many folks here but it >>>>>>> seems to suit you and when you are reasonable, I talk with >> you. >> If >> > you have a problem with a member, do what i do. >> Take it up >> with >> > them direct. Dont play proxy games. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Carol >>>>>> >>>>>> You are nuts. I have NEVER told you who you can or cannot post >> to >> - I >> certainly would never want to be in the least like you! >> I >> took the >> matter of Sheldons dirty mouth up with you, that is >>>> direct, you were >> the one saying 'Oh he doesn't mean that, you >> just >> don't understand >> him' blah blah blah. So yes, when as >> usual he >> spewed more filth, I >> pointed it out to you. >>>>>> >>>>>> "Proxy games" - lol - as I said, you've got bats in the belfry. >>>>> >>>>> You have ISSUES. Every time Sheldon posts something YOU do not >>>>> like, you bring it up to me as if i were involved. Get over it. >>>>> If you have a problem with something he posts, YOU TAKE IT TO HIM >>>>> ok? I am not your Mommie to deal with a bad brother's behavior >> and >> > that is how you have been treating me, up to and including a >> ping >> > to point up a message you felt I should have to deal with >> from >> > Sheldon. >>>>> >>>>> Carol >>>> >>>> OK take this back to square one - he posted dirt - you giggled with >>>> him - I said at the time, glad it amuses you. Oh he doesn't do it >>>> often, you have the wrong opinion of him. Not so, he is filthy >>>> through and through. >>>> >>>> Move forward, a particularly bad post and I asked you if you really >>>> thought it was okay. That was the post I pinged you for, then you >>>> got your knickers knotted. >>>> >>>> THANK GOD YOU ARE NOT MY MOMMIE - I am greatly relieved my mother >> was >> nothing like you, she was a fantastic woman and I definitely >> would not >> have changed her for YOU - UCK ICH ACK PEWEY~ >>> >>> Please stop trying to tell me who I should talk with. If you don't >>> 'get that' then you have issues. We all 'get it' that you have >>> issues with Sheldon. Stop bringing every issue you have with him to >>> me as if I were your Mommie and supposed to make it all better. >>> >>> You are an adult. Act like one. >>> >>> Carol >> >> Now how in hell did you translate that into me telling you who to talk >> to?? Why don't you go back to school and learn how to read >> correctly?? A few spelling lessons would also teach you Shepherds >> Pie as well, no idea what a shepard is, an Austrian dog maybe. > > You will win no friends from abusing a known person with dyslexia over > minor spelling issues. > > You are an abusive person to pull that one. Every time Sheldon says > something you do not like, you come back on me for it. You apparently > object when others are abusive but do not recognize you are even when I > *and others* tell you that you are not acting so pristine. > > I do not appreciate being called out for my dyslexia. I worked hard to > overcome a level that is considered 'will never learn to read' and > obviously I did. > > *Friends* will help me with a word I repeatedly get wrong. Vinegar was > a big one for a long time for example. I was repeatedly using vinagar > (hey, looked right!). This is not a spelling error. It's a literal > reading disability. > > You owe me an apology for abusing me over a disability that is well > known here and has been posted many times. I am a fantastic success > case after long years of work with rare instances of 'oops'. > > Carol > Congratulations on your battle with and victory over dyslexia. That's a tough one to lick. Lucrezia seems bound to live up to her nym. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sqwertz wrote:
> you have no sense of logic at all You're a subhuman virus. ________ _____/ \\_____ | _ ___ _ || | | \ | | \ || | | | | | | || | |_/ | |_/ || | | \ | | || | | \ | | || | | \. _|_. | . || | || | Sqwerty & Marty || | || | * ** * ** || \\)).../..(/...\||(...\\....((// ROTFLMFAO! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sqwertz wrote:
> He's just a Google Monkey at a keyboard. > > -sw ....you and jethro are PWND! LOLOLOL!!!! ________ _____/ \\_____ | _ ___ _ || | | \ | | \ || | | | | | | || | |_/ | |_/ || | | \ | | || | | \ | | || | | \. _|_. | . || | || | Sqwerty & Marty || | || | * ** * ** || \\)).../..(/...\||(...\\....((// ROTFLMFAO! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shalako wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> On 9/4/2015 4:12 PM, cshenk wrote: > > wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > >>On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:07:53 -0500, "cshenk" > > wrote: > > > > > > > wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 12:25:47 -0500, "cshenk" > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 18:26:28 -0500, "cshenk" > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know why you are so nasty to so many folks here > > > > > > > > but it seems to suit you and when you are reasonable, I > > > > > > > > talk with > >>you. >> If >> > you have a problem with a member, do what i do. > >>Take it up >> with >> > them direct. Dont play proxy games. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Carol > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are nuts. I have NEVER told you who you can or > > > > > > > cannot post > >>to >> - I >> certainly would never want to be in the least like you! > >>I >> took the >> matter of Sheldons dirty mouth up with you, that is > >>>>direct, you were >> the one saying 'Oh he doesn't mean that, you > >>just >> don't understand >> him' blah blah blah. So yes, when as > >>usual he >> spewed more filth, I >> pointed it out to you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Proxy games" - lol - as I said, you've got bats in the > > > > > > > belfry. > > > > > > > > > > > > You have ISSUES. Every time Sheldon posts something YOU do > > > > > > not like, you bring it up to me as if i were involved. Get > > > > > > over it. If you have a problem with something he posts, > > > > > > YOU TAKE IT TO HIM ok? I am not your Mommie to deal with a > > > > > > bad brother's behavior > >>and >> > that is how you have been treating me, up to and including > a >>ping >> > to point up a message you felt I should have to deal > with >>from >> > Sheldon. > > > > > > > >>>>> Carol > > > > > > > > > > OK take this back to square one - he posted dirt - you > > > > > giggled with him - I said at the time, glad it amuses you. > > > > > Oh he doesn't do it often, you have the wrong opinion of him. > > > > > Not so, he is filthy through and through. > > > > > > > > > > Move forward, a particularly bad post and I asked you if you > > > > > really thought it was okay. That was the post I pinged you > > > > > for, then you got your knickers knotted. > > > > > > > > > > THANK GOD YOU ARE NOT MY MOMMIE - I am greatly relieved my > > > > > mother > >>was >> nothing like you, she was a fantastic woman and I definitely > >>would not >> have changed her for YOU - UCK ICH ACK PEWEY~ > > > > > > > > Please stop trying to tell me who I should talk with. If you > > > > don't 'get that' then you have issues. We all 'get it' that > > > > you have issues with Sheldon. Stop bringing every issue you > > > > have with him to me as if I were your Mommie and supposed to > > > > make it all better. > > > > > > > > You are an adult. Act like one. > > > > > >>> Carol > > > > > > Now how in hell did you translate that into me telling you who to > > > talk to?? Why don't you go back to school and learn how to read > > > correctly?? A few spelling lessons would also teach you > > > Shepherds Pie as well, no idea what a shepard is, an Austrian dog > > > maybe. > > > > You will win no friends from abusing a known person with dyslexia > > over minor spelling issues. > > > > You are an abusive person to pull that one. Every time Sheldon says > > something you do not like, you come back on me for it. You > > apparently object when others are abusive but do not recognize you > > are even when I *and others* tell you that you are not acting so > > pristine. > > > > I do not appreciate being called out for my dyslexia. I worked > > hard to overcome a level that is considered 'will never learn to > > read' and obviously I did. > > > > *Friends* will help me with a word I repeatedly get wrong. Vinegar > > was a big one for a long time for example. I was repeatedly using > > vinagar (hey, looked right!). This is not a spelling error. It's > > a literal reading disability. > > > > You owe me an apology for abusing me over a disability that is well > > known here and has been posted many times. I am a fantastic success > > case after long years of work with rare instances of 'oops'. > > > > Carol > > > > > Congratulations on your battle with and victory over dyslexia. > > That's a tough one to lick. > > Lucrezia seems bound to live up to her nym. Thank you. I was in special ed classes for years (normal classes but a special section for 60 minutes a day) until I caught on to reading. This isnt a new story here. It's been told before. Perhaps Lucrezia is new enough to not know it? Most people never beat dyslexia unless it's a mild level. The trick that works for some is called 'total word recognition' (very close to speed reading tactics). You grasp by context and the portions of words. Key signs: - Backawards letters. A LOT more than normal - Omitted or added letters - Stuttering - Repetitive spelling issues with specific phenomes or words - Tendancy to conjoin last character with next word likesle (like else) - numbers may or may not be involved Thats just the top 6. There are 19 indicators and I hit 17 of them. I kinda got voted in 2nd grade as 'kid who will never learn to read'. Some do not learn how to turn a disability into an ability. I learned if one word would not want to 'come out' (stuffer side effect) to have another at the ready. I learned a very expanded verbal vocabulary by the 3rd grade and it got better as I went on. I generally can spell most of them too (after effort) but I sometimes goof. It's apt to be the *simple* ones i do not 'see' are wrong. The stutter is not notable external to me. I have the rare but seeming deliberate 'pregnant pause' when public speaking, and yes, I do a LOT of that as part of my job. Sadly my husband has a lesser level of it but did not get help at the critical age. He was 'passed on' which means he has a HS degree but not the facility level I have. Charlotte showed signs too and I worked with her on the way I read, and she's been ok. Carol -- |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "cshenk" > wrote in message ... > wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> Now how in hell did you translate that into me telling you who to talk >> to?? Why don't you go back to school and learn how to read >> correctly?? A few spelling lessons would also teach you Shepherds >> Pie as well, no idea what a shepard is, an Austrian dog maybe. > > You will win no friends from abusing a known person with dyslexia over > minor spelling issues. > > You are an abusive person to pull that one. Every time Sheldon says > something you do not like, you come back on me for it. You apparently > object when others are abusive but do not recognize you are even when I > *and others* tell you that you are not acting so pristine. > > I do not appreciate being called out for my dyslexia. I worked hard to > overcome a level that is considered 'will never learn to read' and > obviously I did. > > *Friends* will help me with a word I repeatedly get wrong. Vinegar was > a big one for a long time for example. I was repeatedly using vinagar > (hey, looked right!). This is not a spelling error. It's a literal > reading disability. > > You owe me an apology for abusing me over a disability that is well > known here and has been posted many times. I am a fantastic success > case after long years of work with rare instances of 'oops'. > > Carol My opinion, for what it's worth, if I can make out a post I really don't care about the spelling at all. As you say, some might have a reason for it, some might make typos, and some might not spell so great, so what. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:13:27 -0500, cshenk wrote: > > > Thank you. I was in special ed classes for years .... > > You keep complaining about the nym-shifting troll, yet you have no > problem sucking up his fake concern for you. > > -sw We have so many of them now, its easy to reply to the first one. Are you telling me who I can reply to? Carol -- |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:37:08 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> You keep complaining about the nym-shifting troll, yet you have no >> problem sucking up his fake concern for you. > >We have so many of them now, its easy to reply to the first one. It's obvious without even downloading the body of the post that it's the casa mental defective. The nyms and email addys are always distinctive, no matter how many times it changes. >Are you telling me who I can reply to? Grow up. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/4/2015 5:13 PM, cshenk wrote:
> Shalako wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> On 9/4/2015 4:12 PM, cshenk wrote: >>> wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>> >>>> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:07:53 -0500, "cshenk" > >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 12:25:47 -0500, "cshenk" > >>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>> wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 18:26:28 -0500, "cshenk" >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't know why you are so nasty to so many folks here >>>>>>>>> but it seems to suit you and when you are reasonable, I >>>>>>>>> talk with >>>> you. >> If >> > you have a problem with a member, do what i do. >>>> Take it up >> with >> > them direct. Dont play proxy games. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Carol >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are nuts. I have NEVER told you who you can or >>>>>>>> cannot post >>>> to >> - I >> certainly would never want to be in the least like you! >>>> I >> took the >> matter of Sheldons dirty mouth up with you, that is >>>>>> direct, you were >> the one saying 'Oh he doesn't mean that, you >>>> just >> don't understand >> him' blah blah blah. So yes, when as >>>> usual he >> spewed more filth, I >> pointed it out to you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Proxy games" - lol - as I said, you've got bats in the >>>>>>>> belfry. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You have ISSUES. Every time Sheldon posts something YOU do >>>>>>> not like, you bring it up to me as if i were involved. Get >>>>>>> over it. If you have a problem with something he posts, >>>>>>> YOU TAKE IT TO HIM ok? I am not your Mommie to deal with a >>>>>>> bad brother's behavior >>>> and >> > that is how you have been treating me, up to and including >> a >>ping >> > to point up a message you felt I should have to deal >> with >>from >> > Sheldon. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Carol >>>>>> >>>>>> OK take this back to square one - he posted dirt - you >>>>>> giggled with him - I said at the time, glad it amuses you. >>>>>> Oh he doesn't do it often, you have the wrong opinion of him. >>>>>> Not so, he is filthy through and through. >>>>>> >>>>>> Move forward, a particularly bad post and I asked you if you >>>>>> really thought it was okay. That was the post I pinged you >>>>>> for, then you got your knickers knotted. >>>>>> >>>>>> THANK GOD YOU ARE NOT MY MOMMIE - I am greatly relieved my >>>>>> mother >>>> was >> nothing like you, she was a fantastic woman and I definitely >>>> would not >> have changed her for YOU - UCK ICH ACK PEWEY~ >>>>> >>>>> Please stop trying to tell me who I should talk with. If you >>>>> don't 'get that' then you have issues. We all 'get it' that >>>>> you have issues with Sheldon. Stop bringing every issue you >>>>> have with him to me as if I were your Mommie and supposed to >>>>> make it all better. >>>>> >>>>> You are an adult. Act like one. >>>>> >>>>> Carol >>>> >>>> Now how in hell did you translate that into me telling you who to >>>> talk to?? Why don't you go back to school and learn how to read >>>> correctly?? A few spelling lessons would also teach you >>>> Shepherds Pie as well, no idea what a shepard is, an Austrian dog >>>> maybe. >>> >>> You will win no friends from abusing a known person with dyslexia >>> over minor spelling issues. >>> >>> You are an abusive person to pull that one. Every time Sheldon says >>> something you do not like, you come back on me for it. You >>> apparently object when others are abusive but do not recognize you >>> are even when I *and others* tell you that you are not acting so >>> pristine. >>> >>> I do not appreciate being called out for my dyslexia. I worked >>> hard to overcome a level that is considered 'will never learn to >>> read' and obviously I did. >>> >>> *Friends* will help me with a word I repeatedly get wrong. Vinegar >>> was a big one for a long time for example. I was repeatedly using >>> vinagar (hey, looked right!). This is not a spelling error. It's >>> a literal reading disability. >>> >>> You owe me an apology for abusing me over a disability that is well >>> known here and has been posted many times. I am a fantastic success >>> case after long years of work with rare instances of 'oops'. >>> >>> Carol >>> >> >> >> Congratulations on your battle with and victory over dyslexia. >> >> That's a tough one to lick. >> >> Lucrezia seems bound to live up to her nym. > > Thank you. I was in special ed classes for years (normal classes but a > special section for 60 minutes a day) until I caught on to reading. > > This isnt a new story here. It's been told before. Perhaps Lucrezia > is new enough to not know it? > > Most people never beat dyslexia unless it's a mild level. The trick > that works for some is called 'total word recognition' (very close to > speed reading tactics). You grasp by context and the portions of words. I had a friend in college, a very bright guy btw, who battled it. He had arrangements where he was able to test orally for his classes ftmp. I don't think any of us suspected a thing until he mentioned it when finals came up and he wasn't going to sit for them with us. He went on to be come a very respected professional in his field. > Key signs: > > - Backawards letters. A LOT more than normal > - Omitted or added letters > - Stuttering > - Repetitive spelling issues with specific phenomes or words > - Tendancy to conjoin last character with next word likesle (like else) > - numbers may or may not be involved > > Thats just the top 6. There are 19 indicators and I hit 17 of them. I > kinda got voted in 2nd grade as 'kid who will never learn to read'. > > Some do not learn how to turn a disability into an ability. > > I learned if one word would not want to 'come out' (stuffer side > effect) to have another at the ready. I learned a very expanded verbal > vocabulary by the 3rd grade and it got better as I went on. I > generally can spell most of them too (after effort) but I sometimes > goof. It's apt to be the *simple* ones i do not 'see' are wrong. > > The stutter is not notable external to me. I have the rare but seeming > deliberate 'pregnant pause' when public speaking, and yes, I do a LOT > of that as part of my job. > > Sadly my husband has a lesser level of it but did not get help at the > critical age. He was 'passed on' which means he has a HS degree but not > the facility level I have. Charlotte showed signs too and I worked > with her on the way I read, and she's been ok. > > Carol An inspiring story for sure and well worth sharing, if not with some of the abusers here. But then, what is? You are your own reward. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/4/2015 5:20 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:13:27 -0500, cshenk wrote: > >> Thank you. I was in special ed classes for years .... > > You keep complaining about the nym-shifting troll, yet you have no > problem sucking up his fake concern for you. > > -sw > You hate all women, and it drips from your every post. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/4/2015 5:37 PM, cshenk wrote:
> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:13:27 -0500, cshenk wrote: >> >>> Thank you. I was in special ed classes for years .... >> >> You keep complaining about the nym-shifting troll, yet you have no >> problem sucking up his fake concern for you. >> >> -sw > > We have so many of them now, its easy to reply to the first one. > > Are you telling me who I can reply to? > > Carol > Of course he is, and you simply _must_ comply or... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/4/2015 5:43 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 18:20:50 -0500, Sqwertz > > wrote: > >> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:13:27 -0500, cshenk wrote: >> >>> Thank you. I was in special ed classes for years .... >> >> You keep complaining about the nym-shifting troll, yet you have no >> problem sucking up his fake concern for you. > > Bingo. > One word hypocrisy from the insincere one. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/4/2015 5:46 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:37:08 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: > >> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> >>> You keep complaining about the nym-shifting troll, yet you have no >>> problem sucking up his fake concern for you. >> >> We have so many of them now, its easy to reply to the first one. > > It's obvious without even downloading the body of the post that it's > the casa mental defective. The nyms and email addys are always > distinctive, no matter how many times it changes. Oh bright boy! You actually caught on to the pattern I use to uniquely identify myself. Dang. >> Are you telling me who I can reply to? > > Grow up. You first, rabbit-killer. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 17:55:39 -0600, Shalako > wrote:
> On 9/4/2015 5:46 PM, Je?us wrote: > > On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:37:08 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: > > > >> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> > >>> You keep complaining about the nym-shifting troll, yet you have no > >>> problem sucking up his fake concern for you. > >> > >> We have so many of them now, its easy to reply to the first one. > > > > It's obvious without even downloading the body of the post that it's > > the casa mental defective. The nyms and email addys are always > > distinctive, no matter how many times it changes. > > Oh bright boy! > > You actually caught on to the pattern I use to uniquely identify myself. Which means you're the anti-frogger. -- sf |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cheri wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> > "cshenk" > wrote in message > ... > > wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > > Now how in hell did you translate that into me telling you who to > > > talk to?? Why don't you go back to school and learn how to read > > > correctly?? A few spelling lessons would also teach you > > > Shepherds Pie as well, no idea what a shepard is, an Austrian dog > > > maybe. > > > > You will win no friends from abusing a known person with dyslexia > > over minor spelling issues. > > > > You are an abusive person to pull that one. Every time Sheldon says > > something you do not like, you come back on me for it. You > > apparently object when others are abusive but do not recognize you > > are even when I *and others* tell you that you are not acting so > > pristine. > > > > I do not appreciate being called out for my dyslexia. I worked > > hard to overcome a level that is considered 'will never learn to > > read' and obviously I did. > > > > *Friends* will help me with a word I repeatedly get wrong. Vinegar > > was a big one for a long time for example. I was repeatedly using > > vinagar (hey, looked right!). This is not a spelling error. It's > > a literal reading disability. > > > > You owe me an apology for abusing me over a disability that is well > > known here and has been posted many times. I am a fantastic success > > case after long years of work with rare instances of 'oops'. > > > > Carol > > My opinion, for what it's worth, if I can make out a post I really > don't care about the spelling at all. As you say, some might have a > reason for it, some might make typos, and some might not spell so > great, so what. > > Cheri Yup, normal behavior. Folks start stretching to grab any ledge they can when they are falling and that may be what we saw here. I will not see an apology I am sure, but just maybe, there might be a spark of awareness. Thats good enough for me. Carol -- |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 16:43:09 -0600, Shalako > wrote:
> On 9/4/2015 4:26 PM, wrote: > >> You owe me an apology for abusing me over a disability that is well > >> >known here and has been posted many times. I am a fantastic success > >> >case after long years of work with rare instances of 'oops'. > >> > > >> > Carol > > Blah blah blah - I had no idea you were disabled, but I should have > > guessed. Anyway, you don't need me to toot your own horn. > > > You really are one cold-hearted hag! She's a nit picker to rag on Carol about a minor spelling mistake, but that's the MO of a few here. -- sf |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:11:44 -0600, Shalako > wrote:
> On 9/4/2015 11:49 AM, jmcquown wrote: > >>> > >>> I remain perplexed that food and bullying are inextricably linked here. > >> > >> This is RFC and it's well known as "indian country." > > > > Actually, it's long been known as 'The Chaotic Kitchen". I started > > reading/posting here around 1997 and things were just as nuts then as > > they are now. Only the characters have changed. There are always > > trolls and spammers, you just have to figure out how to killfile. > > > Let's be crystal clear here - YOU are a bully biotch, period. > > You have been very much responsible for the "culture" of this group, and > you are an unsavory character at best. Disagree. She's one of the long time nicer posters of rfc. -- sf |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:54:10 -0600, Shalako > wrote:
> On 9/4/2015 3:53 PM, Sqwertz wrote: > > On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 12:57:56 -0700, sf wrote: > > > >> I've been amazed by the scope of your knowledge... which goes beyond > >> links from the internet. > > > > Oh, PuhLEEASE <snork>. If it knew anything about cooking it would > > have been contributing here years ago rather than waiting until a year > > after he was harassing the regulars here. > > I didn't wait a year, you lying dwarf. > > I contributed immediately. > > > He just started Googling > > cooking subjects to try and appease his marionettes. > > No why on earth would anyone do that? > > > Like money old women, you have no sense of logic at all and can't see > > reality. > > She may like money, I know a lot of us do, so what is your point, dwarfy? > He should take his little temper tantrum over to Facebook and see how it flies over there. Maybe somebody will pat him on the head and tell him it will be all better soon. -- sf |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 13:30:34 -0700, Dave Smith
> wrote: > On 2015-09-04 12:58, sf wrote: > > On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:31:04 -0500, John Kuthe > > > wrote: > >> > >> You got it, MartyB! > >> > >> Just asnother mentally ill individual with a lot of time on their > >> hands and an Internet connection. > >> > > Which makes three of you. > > > > Some of us have our quirks, but there are some seriously disturbed > individuals in here. Daily nymshifting?? That is a person admitting > that they are a complete loser and, worse, unable to deal with the problem. The frogger is given a pass? Good one Dave. -- sf |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:28:10 -0600, Shalako > wrote:
> On 9/4/2015 1:44 PM, sf wrote: > > On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 08:32:30 -0400, Gary > wrote: > > > >> He/she is ALSO not getting read by most people here due to the > >> nonsense posts, so the good posts are not even seen here. > > > > Tru dat, but it seems like he would have weighed the consequences. > > A perceptive lass you are. > > It seems to have been forgotten that when I used 2 socks, one to flame > and the other to converse that I was attacked under both names > simultaneously. > > The rampant and unrelenting frogging? > > Yes, how selectively short some folks' memories are. Absolutely. I consider it blatant hypocrisy to excuse the likes of Marty, Steve and Jebus, ignore those who are frogging you and make you the scapegoat for their actions. It's just another Julie type pile on. There's a ring leader and all the me-too's who want in on the action but only get their licks in after the ring leader has started punching. Typical gang behavior. -- sf |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:49:22 -0600, Shalako > wrote:
> On 9/4/2015 3:46 PM, Sqwertz wrote: > > He's just a Google Monkey at a keyboard. > > > > -sw > > Ah the jealousy consumes you and Jethro, lol! > > Here's a hint - NO ****ING MAYO! Here's something else. He accuses others of doing what he does and he does far more than just Google. -- sf |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/4/2015 6:05 PM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 17:55:39 -0600, Shalako > wrote: > >> On 9/4/2015 5:46 PM, Je?us wrote: >>> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:37:08 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: >>> >>>> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>>> >>>>> You keep complaining about the nym-shifting troll, yet you have no >>>>> problem sucking up his fake concern for you. >>>> >>>> We have so many of them now, its easy to reply to the first one. >>> >>> It's obvious without even downloading the body of the post that it's >>> the casa mental defective. The nyms and email addys are always >>> distinctive, no matter how many times it changes. >> >> Oh bright boy! >> >> You actually caught on to the pattern I use to uniquely identify myself. > > Which means you're the anti-frogger. Pretty much! And additionally (sort of hate to drop code here) each of my nyms is designed to tell part of a story, some legendary tales, regionally relevant and also quite unique. I will say no more on that bombshell. Recommended viewing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UffK-IHM1B0 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/4/2015 6:10 PM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 16:43:09 -0600, Shalako > wrote: > >> On 9/4/2015 4:26 PM, wrote: >>>> You owe me an apology for abusing me over a disability that is well >>>>> known here and has been posted many times. I am a fantastic success >>>>> case after long years of work with rare instances of 'oops'. >>>>> >>>>> Carol >>> Blah blah blah - I had no idea you were disabled, but I should have >>> guessed. Anyway, you don't need me to toot your own horn. >> >> >> You really are one cold-hearted hag! > > She's a nit picker to rag on Carol about a minor spelling mistake, > but that's the MO of a few here. > It was very cruel given what Carol has revealed to us. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/4/2015 6:13 PM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:11:44 -0600, Shalako > wrote: > >> On 9/4/2015 11:49 AM, jmcquown wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I remain perplexed that food and bullying are inextricably linked here. >>>> >>>> This is RFC and it's well known as "indian country." >>> >>> Actually, it's long been known as 'The Chaotic Kitchen". I started >>> reading/posting here around 1997 and things were just as nuts then as >>> they are now. Only the characters have changed. There are always >>> trolls and spammers, you just have to figure out how to killfile. >> >> >> Let's be crystal clear here - YOU are a bully biotch, period. >> >> You have been very much responsible for the "culture" of this group, and >> you are an unsavory character at best. > > Disagree. She's one of the long time nicer posters of rfc. > We will have to part ways there. She posts very acceptable food talk, but she regularly fillets Julie like a crazed butcher looking for silver skin. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/4/2015 6:21 PM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:54:10 -0600, Shalako > wrote: > >> On 9/4/2015 3:53 PM, Sqwertz wrote: >>> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 12:57:56 -0700, sf wrote: >>> >>>> I've been amazed by the scope of your knowledge... which goes beyond >>>> links from the internet. >>> >>> Oh, PuhLEEASE <snork>. If it knew anything about cooking it would >>> have been contributing here years ago rather than waiting until a year >>> after he was harassing the regulars here. >> >> I didn't wait a year, you lying dwarf. >> >> I contributed immediately. >> >>> He just started Googling >>> cooking subjects to try and appease his marionettes. >> >> No why on earth would anyone do that? >> >>> Like money old women, you have no sense of logic at all and can't see >>> reality. >> >> She may like money, I know a lot of us do, so what is your point, dwarfy? >> > > He should take his little temper tantrum over to Facebook and see how > it flies over there. Mmm hmm... > Maybe somebody will pat him on the head and tell > him it will be all better soon. I can't speak for how the moderator(s) find him to be. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/4/2015 6:22 PM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 13:30:34 -0700, Dave Smith > > wrote: > >> On 2015-09-04 12:58, sf wrote: >>> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:31:04 -0500, John Kuthe > >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> You got it, MartyB! >>>> >>>> Just asnother mentally ill individual with a lot of time on their >>>> hands and an Internet connection. >>>> >>> Which makes three of you. >>> >> >> Some of us have our quirks, but there are some seriously disturbed >> individuals in here. Daily nymshifting?? That is a person admitting >> that they are a complete loser and, worse, unable to deal with the problem. > > The frogger is given a pass? Good one Dave. All part and pattern of the collective hypocrisy. Let's just say that regardless of the chosen nym my posting retains its unique style - by design. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/4/2015 6:31 PM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:28:10 -0600, Shalako > wrote: > >> On 9/4/2015 1:44 PM, sf wrote: >>> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 08:32:30 -0400, Gary > wrote: >>> >>>> He/she is ALSO not getting read by most people here due to the >>>> nonsense posts, so the good posts are not even seen here. >>> >>> Tru dat, but it seems like he would have weighed the consequences. >> >> A perceptive lass you are. >> >> It seems to have been forgotten that when I used 2 socks, one to flame >> and the other to converse that I was attacked under both names >> simultaneously. >> >> The rampant and unrelenting frogging? >> >> Yes, how selectively short some folks' memories are. > > Absolutely. I consider it blatant hypocrisy to excuse the likes of > Marty, Steve and Jebus, ignore those who are frogging you and make you > the scapegoat for their actions. Thank you. > It's just another Julie type pile > on. There's a ring leader and all the me-too's who want in on the > action but only get their licks in after the ring leader has started > punching. Typical gang behavior. Sure is. But I do know how to deal with gangs. You start by cutting the hands off the leader(s) - the rest will scatter. Oh they'll whine at first, before they turn tail and run. Never fails. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/4/2015 6:33 PM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:49:22 -0600, Shalako > wrote: > >> On 9/4/2015 3:46 PM, Sqwertz wrote: >>> He's just a Google Monkey at a keyboard. >>> >>> -sw >> >> Ah the jealousy consumes you and Jethro, lol! >> >> Here's a hint - NO ****ING MAYO! > > Here's something else. He accuses others of doing what he does and he > does far more than just Google. > An astute catch there. Really the passion play that is RFC consists of massive projection, core hypocrisy, and then group bullying until the nonsensical and toxic becomes accepted as the menu of the establishment. I'd link to some Eric Hoffer, but I don't want to be accused of just "googling" an answer up, lol... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
la voz del norte wrote:
> >Who? I got ya Who schwingin'... and you don't get dinner til I lube your old lady's vagina. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 12:25:47 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 18:26:28 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: >> >> > >> > I don't know why you are so nasty to so many folks here but it >> > seems to suit you and when you are reasonable, I talk with you. If >> > you have a problem with a member, do what i do. Take it up with >> > them direct. Dont play proxy games. >> > >> > Carol >> >> You are nuts. I have NEVER told you who you can or cannot post to - I >> certainly would never want to be in the least like you! I took the >> matter of Sheldons dirty mouth up with you, that is direct, you were >> the one saying 'Oh he doesn't mean that, you just don't understand >> him' blah blah blah. So yes, when as usual he spewed more filth, I >> pointed it out to you. >> >> "Proxy games" - lol - as I said, you've got bats in the belfry. > >You have ISSUES. Every time Sheldon posts something YOU do not like, >you bring it up to me as if i were involved. Get over it. If you have >a problem with something he posts, YOU TAKE IT TO HIM ok? I am not >your Mommie to deal with a bad brother's behavior and that is how you >have been treating me, up to and including a ping to point up a message >you felt I should have to deal with from Sheldon. > > Carol I always luv when the gals fight over who'll get first dibs with my peepee! LOL-LOL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:07:53 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 12:25:47 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: >> >> > wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> > >> >> On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 18:26:28 -0500, "cshenk" > >> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> > I don't know why you are so nasty to so many folks here but it >> >> > seems to suit you and when you are reasonable, I talk with you. >> If >> > you have a problem with a member, do what i do. Take it up >> with >> > them direct. Dont play proxy games. >> >> > >> >> > Carol >> >> >> >> You are nuts. I have NEVER told you who you can or cannot post to >> - I >> certainly would never want to be in the least like you! I >> took the >> matter of Sheldons dirty mouth up with you, that is >> direct, you were >> the one saying 'Oh he doesn't mean that, you just >> don't understand >> him' blah blah blah. So yes, when as usual he >> spewed more filth, I >> pointed it out to you. >> >> >> >> "Proxy games" - lol - as I said, you've got bats in the belfry. >> > >> > You have ISSUES. Every time Sheldon posts something YOU do not >> > like, you bring it up to me as if i were involved. Get over it. >> > If you have a problem with something he posts, YOU TAKE IT TO HIM >> > ok? I am not your Mommie to deal with a bad brother's behavior and >> > that is how you have been treating me, up to and including a ping >> > to point up a message you felt I should have to deal with from >> > Sheldon. >> > >> > Carol >> >> OK take this back to square one - he posted dirt - you giggled with >> him - I said at the time, glad it amuses you. Oh he doesn't do it >> often, you have the wrong opinion of him. Not so, he is filthy >> through and through. >> >> Move forward, a particularly bad post and I asked you if you really >> thought it was okay. That was the post I pinged you for, then you >> got your knickers knotted. >> >> THANK GOD YOU ARE NOT MY MOMMIE - I am greatly relieved my mother was >> nothing like you, she was a fantastic woman and I definitely would not >> have changed her for YOU - UCK ICH ACK PEWEY~ > >Please stop trying to tell me who I should talk with. If you don't >'get that' then you have issues. We all 'get it' that you have issues >with Sheldon. Stop bringing every issue you have with him to me as if I >were your Mommie and supposed to make it all better. > >You are an adult. Act like one. > > Carol Oh my... they're still fighting over my peepee... there's plenty to go around, yoose can share! ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/4/2015 7:21 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> la voz del norte wrote: >> >> Who? > > I got ya Who schwingin'... and you don't get dinner til I lube your > old lady's vagina. > Can you just hurry up and pass out tonight? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Left Half 'n Half in the car all night | General Cooking | |||
Kolbeh: A Persian Restaurant to avoid in Seattle unless you like bad service, indifferent managment, wrong orders, and not getting your half eaten food back in a doggy bag to save money and have lunch the next day | Restaurants | |||
Half-Hour Dinner | Recipes (moderated) | |||
dinner tonight, and last night, and the night before, and tomorrow night. . . | General Cooking |