"Jeßus" wrote:
>
> He doesn't offend me, but I do think he's a genuinely creepy guy.
> I could really see him being a snowdropper, or similar.

heheh I had to look that up but once I did.....LOL! ;-D

"Bruce" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 18:58:45 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
>>Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> I agree that the mix is good. I don't understand all these people with
>>> full killfiles. I killfiled the troll and the trolls who troll the
>>> troll, because they spam so much that it became hard to see the real
>>> messages. But other than that, I don't need to filter the mix
>>
>>I have to laugh at it all but I hope the group mentality servives the
>>current *child*. It doesn't help at all when folks like Cindy talks to
>>them.
>
> Or dsi1. I don't know what that is. Denseness, I guess.
>
>>Lets keep talking to real people and ignore the troll who nym shifts?
>>Works for me!
>
> Yep.

You might not like dsi1 but he is no troll! He never changes his nick or
pretends to be something different. I appreciate his sense of humour which
too many people take as serious. It is 'off the wall' but I like that.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 2/09/2015 8:36 PM, Ophelia wrote:
>
>
> "Bruce" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 18:58:45 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>
>>> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>
>>>> I agree that the mix is good. I don't understand all these people with
>>>> full killfiles. I killfiled the troll and the trolls who troll the
>>>> troll, because they spam so much that it became hard to see the real
>>>> messages. But other than that, I don't need to filter the mix
>>>
>>> I have to laugh at it all but I hope the group mentality servives the
>>> current *child*. It doesn't help at all when folks like Cindy talks to
>>> them.
>>
>> Or dsi1. I don't know what that is. Denseness, I guess.
>>
>>> Lets keep talking to real people and ignore the troll who nym shifts?
>>> Works for me!
>>
>> Yep.
>
> You might not like dsi1 but he is no troll! He never changes his nick or
> pretends to be something different. I appreciate his sense of humour
> which
> too many people take as serious. It is 'off the wall' but I like that.
>
Off the wall? Yeah, I'd go along with that! ;-)

--

Xeno

"Xeno" > wrote in message
...
> On 2/09/2015 8:36 PM, Ophelia wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Bruce" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 18:58:45 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>>
>>>>> I agree that the mix is good. I don't understand all these people with
>>>>> full killfiles. I killfiled the troll and the trolls who troll the
>>>>> troll, because they spam so much that it became hard to see the real
>>>>> messages. But other than that, I don't need to filter the mix
>>>>
>>>> I have to laugh at it all but I hope the group mentality servives the
>>>> current *child*. It doesn't help at all when folks like Cindy talks to
>>>> them.
>>>
>>> Or dsi1. I don't know what that is. Denseness, I guess.
>>>
>>>> Lets keep talking to real people and ignore the troll who nym shifts?
>>>> Works for me!
>>>
>>> Yep.
>>
>> You might not like dsi1 but he is no troll! He never changes his nick or
>> pretends to be something different. I appreciate his sense of humour
>> which
>> too many people take as serious. It is 'off the wall' but I like that.
>>
> Off the wall? Yeah, I'd go along with that! ;-)

<g> how could you not? ;-)

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Bruce" wrote in message ...

On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 11:36:38 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>
>
>"Bruce" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 18:58:45 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>
>>>Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>
>>>> I agree that the mix is good. I don't understand all these people with
>>>> full killfiles. I killfiled the troll and the trolls who troll the
>>>> troll, because they spam so much that it became hard to see the real
>>>> messages. But other than that, I don't need to filter the mix
>>>
>>>I have to laugh at it all but I hope the group mentality servives the
>>>current *child*. It doesn't help at all when folks like Cindy talks to
>>>them.
>>
>> Or dsi1. I don't know what that is. Denseness, I guess.
>>
>>>Lets keep talking to real people and ignore the troll who nym shifts?
>>>Works for me!
>>
>> Yep.
>
>You might not like dsi1 but he is no troll! He never changes his nick or
>pretends to be something different. I appreciate his sense of humour
>which
>too many people take as serious. It is 'off the wall' but I like that.

I don't think he's a troll.

===========

Oh! I thought you did!! See? Even I can be wrong ... I thought I was
wrong but obviously I was not ... ;-)


---
http;//www.helpforheroes.org.uk

Ophelia wrote:
> "Bruce" wrote in message
> ...
>
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 11:36:38 +0100, "Ophelia" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> "Bruce" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 18:58:45 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>>
>>>>> I agree that the mix is good. I don't understand all these people with
>>>>> full killfiles. I killfiled the troll and the trolls who troll the
>>>>> troll, because they spam so much that it became hard to see the real
>>>>> messages. But other than that, I don't need to filter the mix
>>>>
>>>> I have to laugh at it all but I hope the group mentality servives the
>>>> current *child*. It doesn't help at all when folks like Cindy talks to
>>>> them.
>>>
>>> Or dsi1. I don't know what that is. Denseness, I guess.
>>>
>>>> Lets keep talking to real people and ignore the troll who nym shifts?
>>>> Works for me!
>>>
>>> Yep.
>>
>> You might not like dsi1 but he is no troll! He never changes his nick or
>> pretends to be something different. I appreciate his sense of humour
>> which
>> too many people take as serious. It is 'off the wall' but I like that.
>
> I don't think he's a troll.
>
> ===========
>
> Oh! I thought you did!! See? Even I can be wrong ... I thought I was
> wrong but obviously I was not ... ;-)

WTF?

Why do you give this guy such a wide berth?

Does he have photos of you or something?

On 2015-09-02 10:36:38 +0000, Ophelia said:

> "Bruce" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 18:58:45 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>
>>> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>
>>>> I agree that the mix is good. I don't understand all these people with
>>>> full killfiles. I killfiled the troll and the trolls who troll the
>>>> troll, because they spam so much that it became hard to see the real
>>>> messages. But other than that, I don't need to filter the mix
>>>
>>> I have to laugh at it all but I hope the group mentality servives the
>>> current *child*. It doesn't help at all when folks like Cindy talks to
>>> them.
>>
>> Or dsi1. I don't know what that is. Denseness, I guess.
>>
>>> Lets keep talking to real people and ignore the troll who nym shifts?
>>> Works for me!
>>
>> Yep.
>
> You might not like dsi1 but he is no troll! He never changes his nick or
> pretends to be something different. I appreciate his sense of humour which
> too many people take as serious. It is 'off the wall' but I like that.

He's one of the good ones.

On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 13:57:38 +1000, Bruce > wrote:

>On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 17:22:53 -0700, gtr > wrote:
>
>>On 2015-09-01 22:15:58 +0000, Bruce said:
>>
>>> On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 14:45:52 -0700, gtr > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2015-09-01 20:28:51 +0000, Bruce said:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 12:56:22 -0400, Brooklyn1
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Carol is not dyslexic, she believes she's an intellectual, NOT! Carol
>>>>>> would do better sticking to her fifth grade level edjewcation.
>>>>>
>>>>> You read alot into a typo.

That's no typo, it's an indication of gross ignorance... there's no
such word "alot".

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> "Bruce" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 18:58:45 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>
>>>Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>
>>>> I agree that the mix is good. I don't understand all these people with
>>>> full killfiles. I killfiled the troll and the trolls who troll the
>>>> troll, because they spam so much that it became hard to see the real
>>>> messages. But other than that, I don't need to filter the mix
>>>
>>>I have to laugh at it all but I hope the group mentality servives the
>>>current *child*. It doesn't help at all when folks like Cindy talks to
>>>them.
>>
>> Or dsi1. I don't know what that is. Denseness, I guess.
>>
>>>Lets keep talking to real people and ignore the troll who nym shifts?
>>>Works for me!
>>
>> Yep.
>
> You might not like dsi1 but he is no troll! He never changes his nick or
> pretends to be something different. I appreciate his sense of humour
> which
> too many people take as serious. It is 'off the wall' but I like that.

So do I, very much so, and I'm all for people posting to whom they choose to
post to without all the dire warnings/threats from others. :-)

Cheri

On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 21:02:44 -0700, gtr > wrote:

>On 2015-09-02 03:57:38 +0000, Bruce said:
>
>> On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 17:22:53 -0700, gtr > wrote:
>>
>>> On 2015-09-01 22:15:58 +0000, Bruce said:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 14:45:52 -0700, gtr > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2015-09-01 20:28:51 +0000, Bruce said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 12:56:22 -0400, Brooklyn1
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Carol is not dyslexic, she believes she's an intellectual, NOT! Carol
>>>>>>> would do better sticking to her fifth grade level edjewcation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You read alot into a typo.
>>>>>
>>>>> I sure would like to see the lot of you in a real-time knife fight.
>>>>
>>>> You watch too many movies.
>>>
>>> Sure, fine: As long as their is a steady attrition...
>>
>> I don't know what your problem is, but I wish you all the best with
>> it.
>
>My problem is seeing every topic turn from cooking and food to a
>discussion of the participants, general sniping, loathing, trolling,
>etc.

No mystery there, most folks here don't cook. Instead thay use RFC as
their personal Jerry Springer show... and the phonies can get away
with it because everyone who eats knows a little something about
cooking from watching foodtv and reading the labels on their freezer
entrees.... imagine, the pinheads who never cook can make light year
long threads about mac 'n cheese, when all they ever ate came in that
green box or more likely the cheapo generic. Everyone here who cooks
by following recipes is no more a cook than a paint by numbers maven
is an artist.

On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 14:44:40 +1000, Bruce > wrote:

>On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 21:02:44 -0700, gtr > wrote:
>
>>On 2015-09-02 03:57:38 +0000, Bruce said:
>>
>>> On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 17:22:53 -0700, gtr > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2015-09-01 22:15:58 +0000, Bruce said:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 14:45:52 -0700, gtr > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2015-09-01 20:28:51 +0000, Bruce said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 12:56:22 -0400, Brooklyn1
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Carol is not dyslexic, she believes she's an intellectual, NOT! Carol
>>>>>>>> would do better sticking to her fifth grade level edjewcation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You read alot into a typo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I sure would like to see the lot of you in a real-time knife fight.
>>>>>
>>>>> You watch too many movies.
>>>>
>>>> Sure, fine: As long as their is a steady attrition...
>>>
>>> I don't know what your problem is, but I wish you all the best with
>>> it.
>>
>>My problem is seeing every topic turn from cooking and food to a
>>discussion of the participants, general sniping, loathing, trolling,
>>etc. Thanks for your good wishes.
>
>How about knife fights and attrition? How do you cook those? Do you
>add any herbs or spices?

You and bwrrryan slather butter flavored Crisco on yer peckers, and
often yoose dive on before yoose dive in. LOL

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>>
>> "Bruce" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 18:58:45 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>>
>>>>Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>>
>>>>> I agree that the mix is good. I don't understand all these people with
>>>>> full killfiles. I killfiled the troll and the trolls who troll the
>>>>> troll, because they spam so much that it became hard to see the real
>>>>> messages. But other than that, I don't need to filter the mix
>>>>
>>>>I have to laugh at it all but I hope the group mentality servives the
>>>>current *child*. It doesn't help at all when folks like Cindy talks to
>>>>them.
>>>
>>> Or dsi1. I don't know what that is. Denseness, I guess.
>>>
>>>>Lets keep talking to real people and ignore the troll who nym shifts?
>>>>Works for me!
>>>
>>> Yep.
>>
>> You might not like dsi1 but he is no troll! He never changes his nick or
>> pretends to be something different. I appreciate his sense of humour
>> which
>> too many people take as serious. It is 'off the wall' but I like that.
>
> So do I, very much so, and I'm all for people posting to whom they choose
> to post to without all the dire warnings/threats from others. :-)

Aye.





--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 2015-09-02 18:34:34 +0000, Ophelia said:

> "Cheri" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>> "Bruce" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 18:58:45 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree that the mix is good. I don't understand all these people with
>>>>>> full killfiles. I killfiled the troll and the trolls who troll the
>>>>>> troll, because they spam so much that it became hard to see the real
>>>>>> messages. But other than that, I don't need to filter the mix
>>>>>
>>>>> I have to laugh at it all but I hope the group mentality servives the
>>>>> current *child*. It doesn't help at all when folks like Cindy talks to
>>>>> them.
>>>>
>>>> Or dsi1. I don't know what that is. Denseness, I guess.
>>>>
>>>>> Lets keep talking to real people and ignore the troll who nym shifts?
>>>>> Works for me!
>>>>
>>>> Yep.
>>>
>>> You might not like dsi1 but he is no troll! He never changes his nick or
>>> pretends to be something different. I appreciate his sense of humour
>>> which
>>> too many people take as serious. It is 'off the wall' but I like that.
>>
>> So do I, very much so, and I'm all for people posting to whom they choose
>> to post to without all the dire warnings/threats from others. :-)
>
> Aye.

I tend to follow users that aren't in continual dialogue with trolls,
or flame-baiters. I skim the rest. But the most important thing, as
here, is to talk about trolls and flame-baiters, who's the worst who's
the best, and then settle into a nice long bickering session with one
another about them or some other randomly selected topic, eventually
concluding with a lot of name calling.

Folks at their finest!

"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
> No mystery there, most folks here don't cook. Instead thay use RFC as
> their personal Jerry Springer show... and the phonies can get away
> with it because everyone who eats knows a little something about
> cooking from watching foodtv and reading the labels on their freezer
> entrees.... imagine, the pinheads who never cook can make light year
> long threads about mac 'n cheese, when all they ever ate came in that
> green box or more likely the cheapo generic. Everyone here who cooks
> by following recipes is no more a cook than a paint by numbers maven
> is an artist.

Behold Sheldon's personal bio. LOL

Cheri

wrote:
>>>> Okay, so we know you think his utter crudity is fine - some of us
>>>> >> >don't and could do without it.
>>> >>
>>> >>You're just looking for a fight.
>> >
>> >Yup, and I decline which really upsets her and some of the others.
> You flatter yourself. Your purity did not extend to creating a whole
> new thread to announce you were kfing Julie though, did it ! You are
> two-faced as hell.


Ding, ding, ding!!!!

Ladies, we have a match, 2 hypocrites in a pod!

Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> My problem is seeing every topic turn from cooking and food to a
>> >discussion of the participants, general sniping, loathing, trolling,
>> >etc.
> No mystery there, most folks here don't cook.

Prove that using rational metrics.

> Instead thay use RFC as
> their personal Jerry Springer show...

Well that IS true.

> and the phonies can get away
> with it because everyone who eats knows a little something about
> cooking from watching foodtv and reading the labels on their freezer
> entrees....


So who ARE the phonies?

Cheri wrote:
>
> "Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
>> No mystery there, most folks here don't cook. Instead thay use RFC as
>> their personal Jerry Springer show... and the phonies can get away
>> with it because everyone who eats knows a little something about
>> cooking from watching foodtv and reading the labels on their freezer
>> entrees.... imagine, the pinheads who never cook can make light year
>> long threads about mac 'n cheese, when all they ever ate came in that
>> green box or more likely the cheapo generic. Everyone here who cooks
>> by following recipes is no more a cook than a paint by numbers maven
>> is an artist.
>
> Behold Sheldon's personal bio. LOL
>
> Cheri
+1!

"gtr" > wrote in message news:2015090212080113695-xxx@yyyzzz...

> I tend to follow users that aren't in continual dialogue with trolls, or
> flame-baiters. I skim the rest. But the most important thing, as here,
> is to talk about trolls and flame-baiters, who's the worst who's the best,
> and then settle into a nice long bickering session with one another about
> them or some other randomly selected topic, eventually concluding with a
> lot of name calling.
>
> Folks at their finest!

I didn't retaliate for many years, but I damned well do now, especially if
it is personal. If you don't, they think they have free rein. I don't put
up with personal attacks any more but I much prefer to be talking cooking.

Now, have you sorted out your beans?? )

This evening I made Italian breaded pork chops with chips and sweetcorn.
Well, I didn't have the chips and corn because I am doing low-carb and there
was enough on the chops. Very good though, just the same


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 2015-09-02 19:41:11 +0000, Ophelia said:

> "gtr" > wrote in message news:2015090212080113695-xxx@yyyzzz...
>
>> I tend to follow users that aren't in continual dialogue with trolls, or
>> flame-baiters. I skim the rest. But the most important thing, as here,
>> is to talk about trolls and flame-baiters, who's the worst who's the best,
>> and then settle into a nice long bickering session with one another about
>> them or some other randomly selected topic, eventually concluding with a
>> lot of name calling.
>>
>> Folks at their finest!
>
> I didn't retaliate for many years, but I damned well do now, especially if
> it is personal. If you don't, they think they have free rein. I don't put
> up with personal attacks any more but I much prefer to be talking cooking.
>
> Now, have you sorted out your beans?? )

Yes I have: I started out cursing at them, have muttered through the
day despite my wife's protest that the lamb/bean stew was fabulous
(she's biased and can't be trusted). I then took a handful of
remaining uncooked beans out of bag and hammered them on the front
portch all the while reciting incantations of loathing.

Finally I wrote a VERY bitter letter to them. They must atone!

On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 06:18:13 -0400, Gary > wrote:

>"Jeßus" wrote:
>>
>> He doesn't offend me, but I do think he's a genuinely creepy guy.
>> I could really see him being a snowdropper, or similar.
>
>heheh I had to look that up but once I did.....LOL! ;-D

I wasn't sure how widely known the term was...

"gtr" > wrote in message news:2015090215261229940-xxx@yyyzzz...
> On 2015-09-02 19:41:11 +0000, Ophelia said:
>
>> "gtr" > wrote in message
>> news:2015090212080113695-xxx@yyyzzz...
>>
>>> I tend to follow users that aren't in continual dialogue with trolls, or
>>> flame-baiters. I skim the rest. But the most important thing, as here,
>>> is to talk about trolls and flame-baiters, who's the worst who's the
>>> best,
>>> and then settle into a nice long bickering session with one another
>>> about
>>> them or some other randomly selected topic, eventually concluding with a
>>> lot of name calling.
>>>
>>> Folks at their finest!
>>
>> I didn't retaliate for many years, but I damned well do now, especially
>> if
>> it is personal. If you don't, they think they have free rein. I don't
>> put
>> up with personal attacks any more but I much prefer to be talking
>> cooking.
>>
>> Now, have you sorted out your beans?? )
>
> Yes I have: I started out cursing at them, have muttered through the day
> despite my wife's protest that the lamb/bean stew was fabulous (she's
> biased and can't be trusted). I then took a handful of remaining uncooked
> beans out of bag and hammered them on the front portch all the while
> reciting incantations of loathing.

What a vision!!!! I expect the bean gods were most impressed! Perfection
is the only way! Accept nothing less!!!

> Finally I wrote a VERY bitter letter to them. They must atone!

Indeed! Do report back on any response)

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Bruce" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 08:57:06 +0100, "Ophelia" >


>>Ahh ok I don't think people ought to be censured regardless who they
>>wish
>>to speak to.
>
> I agree. They should have enough of a brain of themselves.
>
> --
> Bruce

True, but many act as if they're the parent with telling people that their
food choices are wrong, the cooking method is wrong, the way the food looks
is wrong, and so on, so it's not a big leap for these types to try to tell
people who to post to, with "try" being the key word.

Cheri

In article >,
says...
>
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 18:28:00 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
> wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 17:35:58 -0400, Dave Smith
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 2015-08-30 5:29 PM, cshenk wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Sheldon, there arent many of us who put up with your flat out
> >> creapy >> bad behavior. If you were in the miltary now, you'd be
> >> tossed out on >> your ass so fast you wouldnt even know it was the
> >> pavement that hit you >> before you blacked out.
> >> > >
> >> >> There is no excuse for some of the things you have posted in the
> >> last 2 >> days and you know it.
> >> > >
> >> > Tourette's.
> >>
> >> More likely alcohol -
> >
> >There's no reason to assume his alcohol consumption is higher than an
> >average person. He seems to like a little vodka with juice.
> >
> >It could be I exceed him when I sip a six pack over 12 hours. Golly
> >gee, sometimes a whole 12 pack in 12 hours!
> >
> > Carol
>
> There you go, excusing his potty mouth again. However I understand it
> doesn't bother you, you like it for some reason.

?????????????? Have you lost the plot? Far from excusing or
approving him, Carol just slammed Sheldon (requoted in your own post,
and again above) with

"Sheldon, there arent many of us who put up with your flat out
creapy bad behavior. If you were in the miltary now, you'd be
tossed out on your ass so fast you wouldnt even know it was the
pavement that hit you before you blacked out.

There is no excuse for some of the things you have posted in the
last 2 days and you know it"


Janet UK

Cheri wrote:
>Bruce wrote in message
>>Ophelia wrote:
>
>>>Ahh ok I don't think people ought to be censured regardless who they
>>>wish to speak to.
>>
>> I agree. They should have enough of a brain of themselves.
>
>True, but many act as if they're the parent with telling people that their
>food choices are wrong, the cooking method is wrong, the way the food looks
>is wrong, and so on, so it's not a big leap for these types to try to tell
>people who to post to, with "try" being the key word.

Unmoderated Newsgroups are not for the thin skinned/weak minded...
it's that simple... when someone posts something someone doesn't like
the best tact is to STFU and move to the next post or unsubsribe and
stay away from unmoderated Newsgroups. I find it very easy to ignore
whatever/whoever without resorting to babyish/low IQ threats of
killfiles. The mere mention of ones killfile is indicative of the
weakest wussiest wormiest lowest IQ on the net. What's ironic is that
those who whine the most about what others post are those who
contribute the least useful information.

"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message

> Unmoderated Newsgroups are not for the thin skinned/weak minded...
> it's that simple... when someone posts something someone doesn't like
> the best tact is to STFU and move to the next post or unsubsribe and
> stay away from unmoderated Newsgroups. I find it very easy to ignore
> whatever/whoever without resorting to babyish/low IQ threats of
> killfiles. The mere mention of ones killfile is indicative of the
> weakest wussiest wormiest lowest IQ on the net. What's ironic is that
> those who whine the most about what others post are those who
> contribute the least useful information.

I've never killfiled anyone, but it is easy to skip over them and I would
not care much for a moderated newsgroup at all. I can decide for myself
what's appropriate, without someone else deciding that I/others have
offended their sensibilities.

Cheri

Ophelia wrote:
> People *cannot* be controlled in here.


Oh yeah?

Bet me?

They already are!

Bruce wrote:
>> Ahh ok I don't think people ought to be censured regardless who they wish
>> >to speak to.
> I agree. They should have enough of a brain of themselves.


You ****ing LYING HYPOCRITE!!!!!!


You just got done dissing folks for speaking to ME!

You are worthless scum that needs to DIE SOON!

Ophelia wrote:
>>> Ahh ok I don't think people ought to be censured regardless who
>>> they wish
>>> to speak to.
>>
>> I agree. They should have enough of a brain of themselves.
>
> It is their choice and no one can stop them.
>


He is a Liar, a fascist free speach censor, and a manipulator who has
YOU in his power, you poor addled woman!

Bruce wrote:
>>>> hh ok I don't think people ought to be censured regardless who they
>>>> >>>wish
>>>> >>>to speak to.
>>> >>
>>> >>I agree. They should have enough of a brain of themselves.
>> >
>> >It is their choice and no one can stop them.
> Nor can anybody be stopped from commenting on it.


YOU DAMNED LYING SPEECH CENSOR HYPOCRITE AUZZIE DUTCH TURD!

DIE NOW!

Ophelia wrote:
>>
>> Nor can anybody be stopped from commenting on it.
>
> Indeed) The joys of a non moderated group!


One that actively ENDORSES bullying, woman-stalking, and acts as the
virtual Taliban for Marty and Sqwerty!

Bruce wrote:

>>>> It is their choice and no one can stop them.
>>>
>>> Nor can anybody be stopped from commenting on it.
>>
>> Indeed) The joys of a non moderated group!
>
> Anarchy!
>
Precisely where cowardly bullies and psychic vampires like YOU thrive.

You worthlss turd!

Xeno wrote:
>>> Indeed) The joys of a non moderated group!
>>
>> Anarchy!
>>
> To the utter chagrin of the control freaks who inhabit these places! ;-)
>
>
> --


Do tell us why you feel it's a GOOD thing to act as the virtual Taliban
for "Groupkillas" like Marty and the woman-stalking Sqwerty.

Take all the ****ing screens you need:___________________________

Bruce wrote:
>> To the utter chagrin of the control freaks who inhabit these places!;-)
> Yeah, the one who tries to chase people out by spamming and stalking
> them. Not to mention his enablers, of course!
>
> -- Bruce


Says the LYING HYPOCRITE who just chastised folks for replying to ME!

I'd be in sybaritic heaven if I had the chance to **** your face up IN
person, you lying phoney troll *******!

Janet wrote:
> ?????????????? Have you lost the plot?


Have you done your daily Julie-bashing yet, BIOTCH????

Brooklyn1 wrote:
> The mere mention of ones killfile is indicative of the
> weakest wussiest wormiest lowest IQ on the net. What's ironic is that
> those who whine the most about what others post are those who
> contribute the least useful information.

+1000000!!!!!

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 06:48:52 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>
> "Bruce" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> True, but many act as if they're the parent with telling people that their
> food choices are wrong, the cooking method is wrong, the way the food looks
> is wrong, and so on, so it's not a big leap for these types to try to tell
> people who to post to, with "try" being the key word.
>
> Cheri

+1

--

sf

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:45:27 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>
> "Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
>
> > Unmoderated Newsgroups are not for the thin skinned/weak minded...
> > it's that simple... when someone posts something someone doesn't like
> > the best tact is to STFU and move to the next post or unsubsribe and
> > stay away from unmoderated Newsgroups. I find it very easy to ignore
> > whatever/whoever without resorting to babyish/low IQ threats of
> > killfiles. The mere mention of ones killfile is indicative of the
> > weakest wussiest wormiest lowest IQ on the net. What's ironic is that
> > those who whine the most about what others post are those who
> > contribute the least useful information.
>
> I've never killfiled anyone, but it is easy to skip over them and I would
> not care much for a moderated newsgroup at all. I can decide for myself
> what's appropriate, without someone else deciding that I/others have
> offended their sensibilities.
>
IMO, those who have anything bad to say about kill files don't have
one. The rest of us who do, know we don't want to see certain names
in our TOC and let the program do the skipping for us.


--

sf

On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:33:12 -0600, tres piedras >
wrote:

> Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > The mere mention of ones killfile is indicative of the
> > weakest wussiest wormiest lowest IQ on the net. What's ironic is that
> > those who whine the most about what others post are those who
> > contribute the least useful information.
>
> +1000000!!!!!

Total BS

--

sf

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:53:57 +0100, Janet > wrote:

> In article >,
> says...
> >
> > On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 18:28:00 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
> >
> > wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> > >
> > >> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 17:35:58 -0400, Dave Smith
> > >> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > On 2015-08-30 5:29 PM, cshenk wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Sheldon, there arent many of us who put up with your flat out
> > >> creapy >> bad behavior. If you were in the miltary now, you'd be
> > >> tossed out on >> your ass so fast you wouldnt even know it was the
> > >> pavement that hit you >> before you blacked out.
> > >> > >
> > >> >> There is no excuse for some of the things you have posted in the
> > >> last 2 >> days and you know it.
> > >> > >
> > >> > Tourette's.
> > >>
> > >> More likely alcohol -
> > >
> > >There's no reason to assume his alcohol consumption is higher than an
> > >average person. He seems to like a little vodka with juice.
> > >
> > >It could be I exceed him when I sip a six pack over 12 hours. Golly
> > >gee, sometimes a whole 12 pack in 12 hours!
> > >
> > > Carol
> >
> > There you go, excusing his potty mouth again. However I understand it
> > doesn't bother you, you like it for some reason.
>
> ?????????????? Have you lost the plot? Far from excusing or
> approving him, Carol just slammed Sheldon (requoted in your own post,
> and again above) with
>
> "Sheldon, there arent many of us who put up with your flat out
> creapy bad behavior. If you were in the miltary now, you'd be
> tossed out on your ass so fast you wouldnt even know it was the
> pavement that hit you before you blacked out.
>
> There is no excuse for some of the things you have posted in the
> last 2 days and you know it"
>
>
> Janet UK

+1

--

sf

On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:31:20 -0600, tres piedras >
wrote:

> Janet wrote:
> > ?????????????? Have you lost the plot?
>
>
> Have you done your daily Julie-bashing yet, BIOTCH????

When she's right, she's right.

--

sf