Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Sourdough (rec.food.sourdough) Discussing the hobby or craft of baking with sourdough. We are not just a recipe group, Our charter is to discuss the care, feeding, and breeding of yeasts and lactobacilli that make up sourdough cultures. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
The virgin returns
Well - a virgin no more - but still seeking that sublime loaf of
sourdough. Loaf number two came out of the oven a while ago. As promised, I kept reasonably close track of measures and procedures. The good news - the 'deflation' (separation of crust and bread) seems remedied (I still suspect I left it to rise too long). The bad news - I seem to have encountered new / more problems with consistency and size / shape. The worst news - this one was not sour at all. Bland, bland, bland. I am hereby seeking insomniac bread diagnosticians, who have nothing better to do than offer their much appreciated advice. Here's the procedure followed; · Wednesday evening took the refrigerated culture out of the refrigerator. (This is a 'wet' culture). Split in two - one part was 'fed', and replaced in the refrigerator this morning after activation; of the remainder, 1 cup starter was mixed with 1 cup flour. Thoroughly mixed, and left overnight (12 hours) at a controlled 70 o -71 o. · The culture was vigorous and risen this morning, Punched down, added another 1 cup flour and ½ cup water. Mixed vigorously, and proofed in a proofing box at 80 o for 5 hours. · Culture was now well risen and very active. Punched down, and kneaded in 3 cups flour, 1 cup water, 1 ½ teaspoons salt. 1 more cup flour was kneaded in on the board. · In total; 1 cup "wet" culture, 6 cups flour, 2 cups water, 1 ½ teaspoons salt. · After what I felt was a thorough kneading, an slightly oval loaf was formed, and placed on a board. Placed in proofing box at 75 o for 3 ½ hours. At which point, the loaf appeared a full twice original size - although wider rather than higher (damnit). · Loaf was baked in a pre-heated oven @ 375 o, on a baking stone, for 40 minutes. Out of the oven, the loaf looked good - with a mosaic-like crust pattern where it had separated rising. But it was obviously wider than desired; was circular, and had not risen upwards enough. After a short cooling, I indulged. The crust is too thick, and the bread, while of good consistency, is a little more dense than I would desire (not terrible; good consistency, just not 'light' and full of large, irregular holes as I might wish). And the bread is brown - somewhat darker than the flour itself. Worst of all - it is not sour at all. As mentioned in my post the other day, I started this culture from SDI's "San Francisco Original". My first loaf was something of an abomination in density and crust. But it was deliciously sour. This one is not sour AT ALL. I now sympathize with those who have aired similar concerns with this culture. But - because that first loaf was sour, I know it can be. For those who care about such things; all water is clean, unflouridated, unchlorinated well water. All water was added in at 80 o. All flour in the recipe is unbleached, 'organic' flour. Don't know more about it (will endeavor to know more about my flour in future). Any observations? |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
The virgin returns
"Ric" > wrote in message ups.com... Well - a virgin no more - but still seeking that sublime loaf of sourdough. I am hereby seeking insomniac bread diagnosticians, who have nothing better to do than offer their much appreciated advice. Here's the procedure followed; · Wednesday evening took the refrigerated culture out of the refrigerator. (This is a 'wet' culture). Split in two - one part. was 'fed', and replaced in the refrigerator this morning after activation; of the remainder, 1 cup starter was mixed with 1 cup flour. Thoroughly mixed, and left overnight (12 hours) at a controlled 70 o lower the amount of starter used to one our two tablespoons, adjust water to 1/2 c and 1c flour. increase proof temp to 80f. · The culture was vigorous and risen this morning, Punched down, added another 1 cup flour and ½ cup water. Mixed vigorously, and proofed in a proofing box at 80 o for 5 hours. ok · Culture was now well risen and very active. Punched down, and kneaded in 3 cups flour, 1 cup water, 1 ½ teaspoons salt. 1 more cup flour was kneaded in on the board. · In total; 1 cup "wet" culture, 6 cups flour, 2 cups water, 1 ½ teaspoons salt. salt should be 1-2%, so for 6c flour the salt should be 7-14g or 3-5 tsp. longer warm 80-90 ferments will give better sour. your current hydration level is about 60%, which is about right, might try to lower to around 55%. if so add 1/2c to above recommendations and you will have 57% hydration. · Loaf was baked in a pre-heated oven @ 375 o, on a baking stone, for 40 minutes. i always use steam (EXCEPT WHEN DOING DICKY'S RECIPE), water in metal pan on bottom of oven, with temp closer to 400. As mentioned in my post the other day, I started this culture from SDI's "San Francisco Original". more proof that it is not the culture, per se, that gives the sour, but the technique. hope this helps, if not try something else and for god's sake, if it works post it. dan w |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
The virgin returns
Here's my speculation... though bread forensics are not worth much if
you cannot attend the autopsy. The sourness issue... I think you fermented the starter too long the first time around. You were able to transfer a good acid load to dough #1 since it was a new (and balanced) starter. But the starter returned to storage was overly acidic and it could not propagate LB's in the numbers you needed. This was compounded by using a large amount of this starter for bread #2. A smaller amount would have been effectively de-acidified by the larger volume of fresh water and flour. The remedy is to keep 2-3 tablespoons of starter. The volume build-up from a much smaller starter inoculation solves the acid issue will actually make for more sour at the end. It's counter-intuitive, I know. The crust... The flyaway crust you experienced in bread #1 was caused by two things. An insufficient shaping technique that did not properly deflate and align the dough's gluten and too long a period between shaping and baking. You correctly identified half the issue. But appropriate rounding and shaping are key for distributing gas and a developing a tight outer skin. It's the skin tightness that keeps the bread from slumping and spreading. Rounding and shaping are hard to do correctly. It takes time to get the hang of it. Remedy: get a book with pictures that shows the process. Look into Peter Reinhart's books. They have more pictures and illustrations than most. The crumb... machine kneading does not make the best crumb. The gluten is shorter and not as extensible. Others will swear by their KitchenAids and Swedish what-chu-ma-call-ems... but not kneading is best. Use the machine to mix the ingredients, then let the dough rest in a cool place like a cellar or refrigerator for about 12 hours. Longer is fine. Gluten forms with water and time. It's a hydration process. Kneading or time both distribute water. Time is better. This cold rest is called a retard. It is not a proof. You still must proof. But you can skip all of the various punch downs. They serve no purpose in sourdough. They are a relic of yeast bread instruction since yeast breads get very gassy. The taste... There is no thing as a "short" cooling. Tempting as it is, the bread must cool to room temperature and should be at room temperature for at least 3 or 4 hours. If you want warm bread, reheat it. The really interesting flavors do not present themselves until the bread is well rested after baking. This is another one that is counter intuitive and very hard to practice, because warm bread smells so wonderful, but it's true. Perhaps someone else can do the oven temperature, time and stone <g>... Good luck. Keep posting. Will |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
The virgin returns
"Will" > wrote > Perhaps someone else can do the oven temperature, time and stone <g>... > From where I'm at right now (and I am getting pretty comfortable here), the 375 degree bake I would raise to around 460 at least, preheated for a good 45 minutes, and definately check that with an oven thermometer. I didnt notice a really good oven spring (and it saved quite a few pancake loaves) until I turned up the heat on those quarry tiles of mine. And even at that heat, I still bake a full 45 minutes, I get a great crust color and my bread is fully baked through every time, and in no way overdone. I know there will be plenty of disagreement here, especially from the cold-oven crowd, but I am pretty happy with it. Ric, post some pics. hutchndi |
Posted to rec.food.sourdough
|
|||
|
|||
The virgin returns
That is, flat out, the most helpful response imaginable. Much
appreciated. I get the point about acid load and why the first loaf was sour and the second not. I'm keeping a cup or two of starter in the fridge. will revert to the "jellybean" sized glob and start afresh each time. And I DEFINITELY need to get some picture books - I'm lost on the whole shaping / rounding thing. But I was considering the Kitchen Aid - at least until I get the hang of all the other intricacies. Please forgive me ;-) Thanks so much - if and when I ever get a loaf that actually looks edible, I'll post pics. I've even got some delicious 05 Marsanne that I bottled a month ago just waiting for me to cook up some real sour berad to accompany it! Well, it's Friday - I think I'll start a new activation tonight and try again tomorrow! thanks again |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
An old vendor returns | Tea | |||
The Huntress Returns | General Cooking | |||
The Huntress Returns | General Cooking | |||
Cocktail of the Week Returns ... | General | |||
Augsburger Beer Returns | Beer |