Dave Smith wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On 2017-07-16 4:02 PM, cshenk wrote:
> > Dave Smith wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> > > On 2017-07-16 3:13 PM, cshenk wrote:
> > > > Dave Smith wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> > > >
> > >
> > > > > What can you do when you offer advice and the guy refuses to
> > > > > take it and then boasts about doing things that leave the
> > > > > rest of us shaking our heads.
> > > >
> > > > How about, it's his life and he doesnt want opinionated advice
> > > > but something more legal and financially legit for the
> > > > specifics he is in?
> > > >
> > > > JUst because you think I shouldnt get a new (to me, used) car
> > > > is no reason for you to tell me I can't.
> > > >
> > > > Some go on endlessly in this thread on how John shouldnt be
> > > > getting a house at last. It makes me wonder how many of you
> > > > screwed up that you have to warn him? It's been going on for
> > > > months now.
> > > >
> > >
> > > He has been given good advice. He has ignored it and scorned it.
> > > Don't forget that the man who scorns money and capitalism was the
> > > one bragging about how he had inherited a whack of enough money
> > > to buy the house he was already living in.
> >
> > In other words, he ignored your advice?
>
> I don't recall giving him any advice. I did comment on what happened
> with a bipolar cousin who inherited a substantial amount of money and
> blew in on a house that she ended up losing.
>
> > Picking and reading, he's been
> > 'told what to do' entirely too many times so tuned you all out, well
> > intended or not on your ends.
>
> Meanwhile, he has apparently posting about some of the idiotic things
> he has done, like spending money to repair air conditioning in a
> house that someone else owns.


Well, since I dont read all the messages, I can only say if he got a
window unit, he can take it with him.

--


--

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2017-07-16 9:40 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>> On Sun 16 Jul 2017 04:13:04p, jmcquown told us...
>>
>
>> Fair has little to do with it, Jill. People didn't have to keep
>> posting in resonse to it ad nauseum. If John would quit posting
>> about wondrous things he's going to do to "his" house, everone else
>> would quit responding.
>>
>
> Give him credit for achieving what Julie had been trying to do for years,
> to make 90% of the posts about him.

Dave... This infatuation you have with me has got to stop.

On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 3:46:46 PM UTC-5, Sheldon wrote:
....
> You think it's easy try spackling the crack of your fat ass. LOL

Now THAT was good, Sheldon! Just the imagery! :-)

John Kuthe...

"cshenk" > wrote in message
...
> Dave Smith wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On 2017-07-16 4:02 PM, cshenk wrote:
>> > Dave Smith wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >
>> > > On 2017-07-16 3:13 PM, cshenk wrote:
>> > > > Dave Smith wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > > > What can you do when you offer advice and the guy refuses to
>> > > > > take it and then boasts about doing things that leave the
>> > > > > rest of us shaking our heads.
>> > > >
>> > > > How about, it's his life and he doesnt want opinionated advice
>> > > > but something more legal and financially legit for the
>> > > > specifics he is in?
>> > > >
>> > > > JUst because you think I shouldnt get a new (to me, used) car
>> > > > is no reason for you to tell me I can't.
>> > > >
>> > > > Some go on endlessly in this thread on how John shouldnt be
>> > > > getting a house at last. It makes me wonder how many of you
>> > > > screwed up that you have to warn him? It's been going on for
>> > > > months now.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > He has been given good advice. He has ignored it and scorned it.
>> > > Don't forget that the man who scorns money and capitalism was the
>> > > one bragging about how he had inherited a whack of enough money
>> > > to buy the house he was already living in.
>> >
>> > In other words, he ignored your advice?
>>
>> I don't recall giving him any advice. I did comment on what happened
>> with a bipolar cousin who inherited a substantial amount of money and
>> blew in on a house that she ended up losing.
>>
>> > Picking and reading, he's been
>> > 'told what to do' entirely too many times so tuned you all out, well
>> > intended or not on your ends.
>>
>> Meanwhile, he has apparently posting about some of the idiotic things
>> he has done, like spending money to repair air conditioning in a
>> house that someone else owns.
>
>
> Well, since I dont read all the messages, I can only say if he got a
> window unit, he can take it with him.

It's not and he's not planning to move.

On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 22:56:15 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
>"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
>> On 2017-07-16 9:40 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>> On Sun 16 Jul 2017 04:13:04p, jmcquown told us...
>>>
>>
>>> Fair has little to do with it, Jill. People didn't have to keep
>>> posting in resonse to it ad nauseum. If John would quit posting
>>> about wondrous things he's going to do to "his" house, everone else
>>> would quit responding.
>>>
>>
>> Give him credit for achieving what Julie had been trying to do for years,
>> to make 90% of the posts about him.
>
>Dave... This infatuation you have with me has got to stop.

I wonder what Magnetron thinks of it.

"Bruce" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 22:56:15 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
>>> On 2017-07-16 9:40 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>>> On Sun 16 Jul 2017 04:13:04p, jmcquown told us...
>>>>
>>>
>>>> Fair has little to do with it, Jill. People didn't have to keep
>>>> posting in resonse to it ad nauseum. If John would quit posting
>>>> about wondrous things he's going to do to "his" house, everone else
>>>> would quit responding.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Give him credit for achieving what Julie had been trying to do for
>>> years,
>>> to make 90% of the posts about him.
>>
>>Dave... This infatuation you have with me has got to stop.
>
> I wonder what Magnetron thinks of it.

Megatron. I only remember it because for some reason, my husband began
calling me Megatronski. No clue what that means and I did not like it.

On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:06:52 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
>"Bruce" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 22:56:15 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
>>>> On 2017-07-16 9:40 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>>>> On Sun 16 Jul 2017 04:13:04p, jmcquown told us...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Fair has little to do with it, Jill. People didn't have to keep
>>>>> posting in resonse to it ad nauseum. If John would quit posting
>>>>> about wondrous things he's going to do to "his" house, everone else
>>>>> would quit responding.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Give him credit for achieving what Julie had been trying to do for
>>>> years,
>>>> to make 90% of the posts about him.
>>>
>>>Dave... This infatuation you have with me has got to stop.
>>
>> I wonder what Magnetron thinks of it.
>
>Megatron. I only remember it because for some reason, my husband began
>calling me Megatronski. No clue what that means and I did not like it.

That's an eerie connection between you and Dave. There is more than
meets the eye here.

"Bruce" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:06:52 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 22:56:15 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> On 2017-07-16 9:40 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun 16 Jul 2017 04:13:04p, jmcquown told us...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Fair has little to do with it, Jill. People didn't have to keep
>>>>>> posting in resonse to it ad nauseum. If John would quit posting
>>>>>> about wondrous things he's going to do to "his" house, everone else
>>>>>> would quit responding.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Give him credit for achieving what Julie had been trying to do for
>>>>> years,
>>>>> to make 90% of the posts about him.
>>>>
>>>>Dave... This infatuation you have with me has got to stop.
>>>
>>> I wonder what Magnetron thinks of it.
>>
>>Megatron. I only remember it because for some reason, my husband began
>>calling me Megatronski. No clue what that means and I did not like it.
>
> That's an eerie connection between you and Dave. There is more than
> meets the eye here.

Yeah. There have been times where I was convinced that he might be my
husband. However, if the pic he has on the website is really him, they look
nothing alike.

On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:28:46 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
>"Bruce" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:06:52 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
...
>>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 22:56:15 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>> On 2017-07-16 9:40 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun 16 Jul 2017 04:13:04p, jmcquown told us...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fair has little to do with it, Jill. People didn't have to keep
>>>>>>> posting in resonse to it ad nauseum. If John would quit posting
>>>>>>> about wondrous things he's going to do to "his" house, everone else
>>>>>>> would quit responding.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Give him credit for achieving what Julie had been trying to do for
>>>>>> years,
>>>>>> to make 90% of the posts about him.
>>>>>
>>>>>Dave... This infatuation you have with me has got to stop.
>>>>
>>>> I wonder what Magnetron thinks of it.
>>>
>>>Megatron. I only remember it because for some reason, my husband began
>>>calling me Megatronski. No clue what that means and I did not like it.
>>
>> That's an eerie connection between you and Dave. There is more than
>> meets the eye here.
>
>Yeah. There have been times where I was convinced that he might be my
>husband. However, if the pic he has on the website is really him, they look
>nothing alike.

It would explain Dave's fascination with you.

On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 9:28:55 PM UTC-10, Julie Bove wrote:
> "Bruce" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:06:52 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>"Bruce" > wrote in message
> . ..
> >>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 22:56:15 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> >>> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>>>> On 2017-07-16 9:40 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sun 16 Jul 2017 04:13:04p, jmcquown told us...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Fair has little to do with it, Jill. People didn't have to keep
> >>>>>> posting in resonse to it ad nauseum. If John would quit posting
> >>>>>> about wondrous things he's going to do to "his" house, everone else
> >>>>>> would quit responding.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Give him credit for achieving what Julie had been trying to do for
> >>>>> years,
> >>>>> to make 90% of the posts about him.
> >>>>
> >>>>Dave... This infatuation you have with me has got to stop.
> >>>
> >>> I wonder what Magnetron thinks of it.
> >>
> >>Megatron. I only remember it because for some reason, my husband began
> >>calling me Megatronski. No clue what that means and I did not like it.
> >
> > That's an eerie connection between you and Dave. There is more than
> > meets the eye here.
>
> Yeah. There have been times where I was convinced that he might be my
> husband. However, if the pic he has on the website is really him, they look
> nothing alike.

That shit is just plain creepy. They're coming to get you Barbara!

"Bruce" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:28:46 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:06:52 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
m...
>>>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 22:56:15 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>> On 2017-07-16 9:40 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun 16 Jul 2017 04:13:04p, jmcquown told us...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fair has little to do with it, Jill. People didn't have to keep
>>>>>>>> posting in resonse to it ad nauseum. If John would quit posting
>>>>>>>> about wondrous things he's going to do to "his" house, everone else
>>>>>>>> would quit responding.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Give him credit for achieving what Julie had been trying to do for
>>>>>>> years,
>>>>>>> to make 90% of the posts about him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Dave... This infatuation you have with me has got to stop.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder what Magnetron thinks of it.
>>>>
>>>>Megatron. I only remember it because for some reason, my husband began
>>>>calling me Megatronski. No clue what that means and I did not like it.
>>>
>>> That's an eerie connection between you and Dave. There is more than
>>> meets the eye here.
>>
>>Yeah. There have been times where I was convinced that he might be my
>>husband. However, if the pic he has on the website is really him, they
>>look
>>nothing alike.
>
> It would explain Dave's fascination with you.

*shudder*

Whining Boatwright wrote:
> I don't need to hear from you again, especially since you have a
> clear disdain and dislike for me. But, then, you've always got to
> have the last word, which is obvious in the way you post to many
> others on RFC.

Whine-boy seems to have a problem with many here in RFC-Usenet. I
suggest he go away and problem solved. sheeze!

On 2017-07-16 9:40 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> On Sun 16 Jul 2017 04:13:04p, jmcquown told us...
>
> Fair has little to do with it, Jill. People didn't have to keep
> posting in resonse to it ad nauseum. If John would quit posting
> about wondrous things he's going to do to "his" house, everone else
> would quit responding.

I might work if he were normal.

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2017-07-16 9:40 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>> On Sun 16 Jul 2017 04:13:04p, jmcquown told us...
>>
>> Fair has little to do with it, Jill. People didn't have to keep
>> posting in resonse to it ad nauseum. If John would quit posting
>> about wondrous things he's going to do to "his" house, everone else
>> would quit responding.
>
> I might work if he were normal.

Really? What would you do?

Whine Boatwright wrote:

> He
> doesn't even realize that he needs professional help, but that is
> exactly what he needs, and no one here can give him that. I hope not
> to contribute any further to this thread.

No problem Wayne, just shut the hell up about it all. :-D

On Monday, July 17, 2017 at 6:33:57 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2017-07-16 9:40 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> > On Sun 16 Jul 2017 04:13:04p, jmcquown told us...
> >
> > Fair has little to do with it, Jill. People didn't have to keep
> > posting in resonse to it ad nauseum. If John would quit posting
> > about wondrous things he's going to do to "his" house, everone else
> > would quit responding.
>
> I might work if he were normal.

You DO realise there is no such thing as "normal"? Only various shades on the DSM-V continuum?

John Kuthe...

On Monday, July 17, 2017 at 7:54:37 AM UTC-5, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
....
> But that's just it, Dave, he isn't normal. He is either bipolar or has
> some othr mental deficit, and besides the issues with "his" house, he
> craves attention. ...

Everyone who posts to the Internet "craves attention"!

John Kuthe...

On 2017-07-16, jmcquown > wrote:

> The difference is you do that on purpose, nb.

No kidding?

> it keeps trying to change notbob into something to do with boobs LOL
> (You know I'm teasing, right?)

Yes.

nb

In article >,
says...
> >>
> >> On Sun 16 Jul 2017 02:55:04a, Janet told us...
> >>
> >> > In article >,
> >> > says...
> >
> >> >> Who really cares what John wastes his money on? If he's
> >> >> stupid enough to do so, then he deserves what he gets. It
> >> >> doesn't affect anyone else's life here.
> >> >
> >> > Yeah right. You're very smug and insular Wayne.
> >
> >> Before I retired I worked in the mental health field for 11 years
> >> and was a licensed clinical psychologist.
> >
> > Then you should be profesionally ashamed to have written about a
> > man
> > with bipolar disorder
> >
> > " Who really cares what John wastes his money on? If he's stupid
> > enough to do so, then he deserves what he gets."
> >
> >
> > Janet UK
>
> I'm not the least bit ashamed. Whether or not he is bipolar or has
> some other mental issue is not something that neither I nor anyone
> else on this newsgroup can remedy.

The issue is your ugly attitude to John's mental illness.

What any "clinical psychologist" should be ashamed of, is calling his
obvious disorder stupidity and saying he deserves whatever real life
problems result from his mental disorder.


Janet UK

On 7/17/2017 11:37 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:19:41 GMT, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>
>> Now there's the pot calling the kettle black. As if you've never
>> displayed an ugly and insidious attitude toward several people in
>> this group, and repeatedly, not just once. If you criticize anyone
>> it should be yourself. You're really quite a piece of work, in
>> essence, a bitch.
>
> "I hope not to contribute any further to this thread."
>
> - Wayne Boatwright - 4 hours and 20 minutes ago.
>
> -sw
>


well, would you consider that "contributing"?

On 7/17/2017 1:19 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> If you criticize anyone
> it should be yourself. You're really quite a piece of work, in
> essence, a bitch.
>

You're a queen, right?

In article >,
says...
> Subject: to John Kuthe
> From: Wayne Boatwright >
> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
>
> On Mon 17 Jul 2017 09:33:02a, Janet told us...
>
> > [quoted text muted]
> >
> > Oh no, we've found something to agree on. Whatever next.
> >
> > Janet UK
> >
>
> I know a great deal about bipolor disorders, probably more than
> you'll ever know.

You're so far up your own arse you should be careful not to choke.

> I also know that you can't fix it here.

Nobody here has any delusions they can fix John's disorder.
But that doesn't mean they share your high-handed self-centred attitude
that he deserves whatever happens, and that you don't give a shit
because it doesn't affect your life.

Janet UK

On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 21:05:42 +0100, Janet > wrote:

>In article >,
says...
>> Subject: to John Kuthe
>> From: Wayne Boatwright >
>> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
>>
>> On Mon 17 Jul 2017 09:33:02a, Janet told us...
>>
>> > [quoted text muted]
>> >
>> > Oh no, we've found something to agree on. Whatever next.
>> >
>> > Janet UK
>> >
>>
>> I know a great deal about bipolor disorders, probably more than
>> you'll ever know.
>
> You're so far up your own arse you should be careful not to choke.

I'm sure you can give him some advice on how to deal with this
affliction.

On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:46:30 -0700, Taxed and Spent
> wrote:

>On 7/17/2017 11:37 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:19:41 GMT, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>
>>> Now there's the pot calling the kettle black. As if you've never
>>> displayed an ugly and insidious attitude toward several people in
>>> this group, and repeatedly, not just once. If you criticize anyone
>>> it should be yourself. You're really quite a piece of work, in
>>> essence, a bitch.
>>
>> "I hope not to contribute any further to this thread."
>>
>> - Wayne Boatwright - 4 hours and 20 minutes ago.
>>
>> -sw
>>
>well, would you consider that "contributing"?

Hey, I think it's one of his best posts yet.

On 2017-07-17 4:05 PM, Janet wrote:

>> I also know that you can't fix it here.
>
> Nobody here has any delusions they can fix John's disorder.
> But that doesn't mean they share your high-handed self-centred attitude
> that he deserves whatever happens, and that you don't give a shit
> because it doesn't affect your life.'

How can he say it that it would not sound dispassionate. Kuthe is just
one of many names posting here. He means no more to Wayne than any of
the other reality challenged people posting. Kuthe was warned about
letting his mania make bad decisions for himself. Not much more can be
done. There is no reason for him to mean anything to Wayne.

In article >,
says...
> Subject: to John Kuthe
> From: Wayne Boatwright >
> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
>
> On Mon 17 Jul 2017 01:05:42p, Janet told us...
>
> > In article >,
> > says...
> >> Subject: to John Kuthe
> >> From: Wayne Boatwright >
> >> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
> >>
> >> On Mon 17 Jul 2017 09:33:02a, Janet told us...
> >>
> >> > [quoted text muted]
> >> >
> >> > Oh no, we've found something to agree on. Whatever next.
> >> >
> >> > Janet UK
> >> >
> >>
> >> I know a great deal about bipolor disorders, probably more than
> >> you'll ever know.
> >
> > You're so far up your own arse you should be careful not to
> > choke.
>
> hehehe
>
> >> I also know that you can't fix it here.
> >
> > Nobody here has any delusions they can fix John's disorder.
> > But that doesn't mean they share your high-handed self-centred
> > attitude
> > that he deserves whatever happens, and that you don't give a shit
> > because it doesn't affect your life.
> >
> > Janet UK
> >
>
> It doesn't affect your life either

So what? If that was a reason to ignore posters, there's be no usenet
groups.

>You and everyone else posting to him are
> totally ineffectual.

We know. Get over your dumb notion rfc is aiming for a miracle cure.
John has a long history on this group and it's used to his ways.
Evidently he gets something out of rfc or he'd not be here. Whatever
that is, need not concern you since you don't give a shit, remember?

> I doubt he understands his problem, or he would
> have already sought help for it.

He says he does; he's a nurse, or was.

> Some bipolars know they are and
> don't want to deal withi it or want help for it. None of you can
> diagnose him, so don't even try.

No need for anyone here to diagnose John; he's very aware of and
upfront about being bipolar. If you paid more attention you'd know he
has attended hospital (because he was aware of being ill), has been
professionally diagnosed, and takes medication. That information is all
posted by him in this thread (and many previous ones).

You must be the only poster here who doesn't know all that, so best
get down off your soapbox now.

Janet UK

"Wayne Boatwright" > wrote in message
9.44...
> On Mon 17 Jul 2017 09:57:54a, Janet told us...
>
>> In article >,
>> says...
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sun 16 Jul 2017 02:55:04a, Janet told us...
>>> >>
>>> >> > In article
>>> >> > >,
>>> >> > says...
>>> >
>>> >> >> Who really cares what John wastes his money on? If he's
>>> >> >> stupid enough to do so, then he deserves what he gets. It
>>> >> >> doesn't affect anyone else's life here.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Yeah right. You're very smug and insular Wayne.
>>> >
>>> >> Before I retired I worked in the mental health field for 11
>>> >> years and was a licensed clinical psychologist.
>>> >
>>> > Then you should be profesionally ashamed to have written
>>> > about a man
>>> > with bipolar disorder
>>> >
>>> > " Who really cares what John wastes his money on? If he's
>>> > stupid
>>> > enough to do so, then he deserves what he gets."
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Janet UK
>>>
>>> I'm not the least bit ashamed. Whether or not he is bipolar or
>>> has some other mental issue is not something that neither I nor
>>> anyone else on this newsgroup can remedy.
>>
>> The issue is your ugly attitude to John's mental illness.
>>
>> What any "clinical psychologist" should be ashamed of, is
>> calling his
>> obvious disorder stupidity and saying he deserves whatever real
>> life problems result from his mental disorder.
>>
>>
>> Janet UK
>>
>
> Now there's the pot calling the kettle black. As if you've never
> displayed an ugly and insidious attitude toward several people in
> this group, and repeatedly, not just once. If you criticize anyone
> it should be yourself. You're really quite a piece of work, in
> essence, a bitch.

This is true but I don't think she has ever called herself a psychologist.

On Monday, July 17, 2017 at 2:08:51 PM UTC-5, Sheldon Katz wrote:
> On 7/17/2017 1:19 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> > If you criticize anyone
> > it should be yourself. You're really quite a piece of work, in
> > essence, a bitch.
> >
>
> You're a queen, right?

BITCH FIGHT! ;-)

John Kuthe...

On 7/16/2017 8:48 PM, wrote:
> The only difference between John and you is that you inherited your
> house and he has to buy it - think about it!

I do agree but personally - sounds to me like John inherited quite a bit
of money. Since he is a tenant in a house and sharing rent with like 4
other people, how much can that rent be? He's in his 50s or 60s now.
Seems to me that he could have just kept on renting there and his
inheritance interest would easily pay the rent. He wouldn't have to
spend any of the principle. Money in the bank is security for the future.

Money might not buy happiness but it sure does offer security and that
counts quite a bit to me. Ever gone towards an end of month with very
little work and worry just about paying rent or basic bills on time?
I've been there before. It's not a fun thing to deal with.

Again.....money in the bank is security. You don't have to lose sleep at
night worrying about paying bills on time.

Seems like many here have never had that problem. Good for you.

On 7/18/2017 8:35 AM, Gary wrote:
> On 7/16/2017 8:48 PM, wrote:
>> The only difference between John and you is that you inherited your
>> house and he has to buy it - think about it!
>
> I do agree but personally - sounds to me like John inherited quite a bit
> of money. Since he is a tenant in a house and sharing rent with like 4
> other people, how much can that rent be? He's in his 50s or 60s now.
> Seems to me that he could have just kept on renting there and his
> inheritance interest would easily pay the rent. He wouldn't have to
> spend any of the principle. Money in the bank is security for the future.
>
> Money might not buy happiness but it sure does offer security and that
> counts quite a bit to me. Ever gone towards an end of month with very
> little work and worry just about paying rent or basic bills on time?
> I've been there before. It's not a fun thing to deal with.
>
> Again.....money in the bank is security. You don't have to lose sleep at
> night worrying about paying bills on time.
>
> Seems like many here have never had that problem. Good for you.
>

Real estate can be security too. If I ever run out of money in my 401k,
I can tap into the equity of my house and live happily many more years.
Both real estate and stock market are subject to fluctuations in value.
Would be nice to have a few gold bars under the bed too.

John is buying more than a house. He is buying happiness in the form of
lifestyle. He likes having the tenant around, sort of like buying a
family. I hope it works out for him as intended.

On 7/18/2017 9:12 AM, wrote:

>> Again.....money in the bank is security. You don't have to lose sleep at
>> night worrying about paying bills on time.
>>
>> Seems like many here have never had that problem. Good for you.
>
> I've had poor times too but I was also strictly brought up that you
> didn't spend what you haven't got lol Stupid use of credit cards
> seems to get most people in trouble. I've got a top credit rating
> but I don't go out and spend on that account.
>

A woman at work mad some bad choices with a divorce, getting rid of a
dondo, etc. She now has a consolidation loan to get rid of her credit
card and other debts. I'm not sure of the amount, but I; guessing in
the range of 20k. Interest rate is 31%. No, that is not a typo. She
will end up paying at least double what she owes.

On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 8:39:56 AM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
....
> Real estate can be security too. If I ever run out of money in my 401k,
> I can tap into the equity of my house and live happily many more years.
> Both real estate and stock market are subject to fluctuations in value.
> Would be nice to have a few gold bars under the bed too.
>
> John is buying more than a house. He is buying happiness in the form of
> lifestyle. He likes having the tenant around, sort of like buying a
> family. I hope it works out for him as intended.

You GOT it Ed! Thanks! That's also WHY I'm getting the red clay 1/2 pipe tile roof and the brick/tile front porch REPAIRED and RESTORED!! Yes it's gonna be but-assed expensive, but it will also add GREATLY to the value of this house! And yes I KNOW it will not add that much monetary value as it will cost me to do, but to think that ALL values can be equated to dollars is BULLSHIT!

John Kuthe...

On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 8:44:03 AM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 7/18/2017 9:12 AM, wrote:
>
> >> Again.....money in the bank is security. You don't have to lose sleep at
> >> night worrying about paying bills on time.
> >>
> >> Seems like many here have never had that problem. Good for you.
> >
> > I've had poor times too but I was also strictly brought up that you
> > didn't spend what you haven't got lol Stupid use of credit cards
> > seems to get most people in trouble. I've got a top credit rating
> > but I don't go out and spend on that account.
> >
>
> A woman at work mad some bad choices with a divorce, getting rid of a
> dondo, etc. She now has a consolidation loan to get rid of her credit
> card and other debts. I'm not sure of the amount, but I; guessing in
> the range of 20k. Interest rate is 31%. No, that is not a typo. She
> will end up paying at least double what she owes.

And that is why I want to buy this house CASH and to as much renovation as possible via cash too! I want to AVOID debt as much as possible!!

**** the evil MONEYCHANGERS!! Mammon Worshiping SCUM!

John Kuthe...

On 2017-07-18 9:43 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:


> A woman at work mad some bad choices with a divorce, getting rid of a
> dondo, etc.

Bad choice about getting divorced or getting rid of the condo?

> She now has a consolidation loan to get rid of her credit card and
> other debts. I'm not sure of the amount, but I; guessing in the
> range of 20k. Interest rate is 31%. No, that is not a typo. She
> will end up paying at least double what she owes.

I imagine her bad choices would include running up so much credit card
debt that she had to get a consolidation loan. 31% interest on the
consolidation loan????? Holy crap.... another bad choice. If she has
that much debt it will likely take more than 3 years to pay it off so it
is going to be more than double the principle.

On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 10:13:26 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
....
> I imagine her bad choices would include running up so much credit card
> debt that she had to get a consolidation loan. 31% interest on the
> consolidation loan????? Holy crap.... another bad choice. If she has
> that much debt it will likely take more than 3 years to pay it off so it
> is going to be more than double the principle.

Yep, debt can easily become an EVIL MONSTER!! That's why I try to eschew it at every opportunity!! Cash on the barrelhead is best!


John Kuthe...

On 7/18/2017 11:13 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2017-07-18 9:43 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
>
>> A woman at work mad some bad choices with a divorce, getting rid of a
>> dondo, etc.
>
> Bad choice about getting divorced or getting rid of the condo?

She was under water with the condo so walked away. Not sure about the
divorce, she never gave details.

>
>> She now has a consolidation loan to get rid of her credit card and
>> other debts. I'm not sure of the amount, but I; guessing in the
>> range of 20k. Interest rate is 31%. No, that is not a typo. She
>> will end up paying at least double what she owes.
>
> I imagine her bad choices would include running up so much credit card
> debt that she had to get a consolidation loan. 31% interest on the
> consolidation loan????? Holy crap.... another bad choice. If she has
> that much debt it will likely take more than 3 years to pay it off so it
> is going to be more than double the principle.

She was also underwater on a car. Rather than trade it and take a hit,
she leased a new car and let the old one be repossessed. Then she took
an even bigger hit when the auction was way low. The car she leased is
based on 12,000 miles a year. At two years she is at 35,000 already.
Unless she buys it, that will be another hit.

She has 25 years to retirement ago and will probably still be in hock at
that point. Maybe she'll meet a nice wealthy man and get married. This
is an otherwise seemingly intelligent person.

lucretiaborgia wrote:
>
> The only difference between John and you is that you inherited your
> house and he has to buy it - think about it!

Nothing to think about... inheriting a house and buying a house with
inherited money are exactly the same.

On 2017-07-18 11:40 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 7/18/2017 11:13 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2017-07-18 9:43 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:

> She was also underwater on a car. Rather than trade it and take a hit,
> she leased a new car and let the old one be repossessed. Then she took
> an even bigger hit when the auction was way low. The car she leased is
> based on 12,000 miles a year. At two years she is at 35,000 already.
> Unless she buys it, that will be another hit.
>
> She has 25 years to retirement ago and will probably still be in hock at
> that point. Maybe she'll meet a nice wealthy man and get married. This
> is an otherwise seemingly intelligent person.
>


Wow. One bad choice after another. I have a nephew like that. He had
something like $30-40,000 in credit card debt and consolidated it to get
lower rates. He married a woman (with one kid) who we thought was a bit
of a low life and who later turned out to be a true scum bucket with a
drug problem. They managed to get a mortgage on a small house and he
immediately went out (in Novermber) and bought a bunch of patio
furniture because it was on sale... all on credit cards. Then he got a
macho looking car. He ended up divorced, and lost money on the sale of
the house. If someone stepped in an paid off all his debts he would
likely run out and charge a whole pile more on his cards.

On 7/18/2017 9:36 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2017-07-18 11:40 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> On 7/18/2017 11:13 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2017-07-18 9:43 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
>> She was also underwater on a car. Rather than trade it and take a hit,
>> she leased a new car and let the old one be repossessed. Then she took
>> an even bigger hit when the auction was way low. The car she leased is
>> based on 12,000 miles a year. At two years she is at 35,000 already.
>> Unless she buys it, that will be another hit.
>>
>> She has 25 years to retirement ago and will probably still be in hock at
>> that point. Maybe she'll meet a nice wealthy man and get married. This
>> is an otherwise seemingly intelligent person.
>>
>
>
> Wow. One bad choice after another. I have a nephew like that. He had
> something like $30-40,000 in credit card debt and consolidated it to get
> lower rates. He married a woman (with one kid) who we thought was a bit
> of a low life and who later turned out to be a true scum bucket with a
> drug problem. They managed to get a mortgage on a small house and he
> immediately went out (in Novermber) and bought a bunch of patio
> furniture because it was on sale... all on credit cards. Then he got a
> macho looking car. He ended up divorced, and lost money on the sale of
> the house. If someone stepped in an paid off all his debts he would
> likely run out and charge a whole pile more on his cards.
>


Excuse me, but has he ever thought of running for elected office?
Sounds like he would fit right in.

On 7/18/2017 8:58 AM, wrote:
> lucretiaborgia wrote:
>>
>> The only difference between John and you is that you inherited your
>> house and he has to buy it - think about it!
>
> Nothing to think about... inheriting a house and buying a house with
> inherited money are exactly the same.
>


Except for the concept of CHOICE. Duh.