Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
On 16/10/2012 10:47 AM, Doug Freyburger wrote:
>> Chances are that when you bought something from Dr. Leonards, in the >> fine print they assumed permission to call you. > > It gives them permission to call you until you tell them to put you on > their do-not-call list. Doing business once estalishes an exception to > the general list. Telling them on a call revokes that exception. This > process has worked for me. What a coincidence. Just as I was reading your comment about dong business with someone once establishing an exception, the phone rang. It was someone from the theatre we went to on the weekend. She asked to speak to my wife and when I said she wasn't here right now the woman said that she was calling from Mervish productions and that she would call another time and quickly hung up. Since we now have that previous business relationship, it is not a violation of the DNC. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
... > The parent company for Dr. Leonards I think also owns Amerimark, Anthony > Richards, Beauty Boutique, Essentials, Healthy Living, Windsor, > Complements, and I think Taylor Gifts which is also connected to Get > Organized. That explains it then, I did order sandals from AR not too long ago. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
... > > "jmcquown" > wrote in message > ... >> "sf" wrote in message ... >> >> On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:58:24 -0700, "Julie Bove" >> > wrote: >> >>> I won't do that. I just think that is so very rude. When people >>> routinely >>> do that, I just won't call them any more. I don't have time to play >>> that >>> game of leaving a message and waiting for them to call me back. >> >> That's life. People who screen their calls will pick up if they want >> to talk to you. If they're not home, you won't hear from them anyway. >> >> -- >> I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila >> >> ********************* >> Exactly. If the person leaving a message is someone I want to talk to, >> I'll pick up. >> >> Sometimes it's someone I would like to talk to but I'm in the middle of >> something. No big deal to call them back when I'm not busy. It's not >> rude, it's reality. > > That's not always true. I have had people tell me they never answer the > phone. They always let the answering machine take it and then they make > their calls back at a certain hour that they have set aside for doing > that. Well, yeah...but a home phone is for the convenience of the person paying for it, so it makes sense for a person to call back when it's convenient for them to talk IMO. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
"Cheri" wrote in message ...
"Julie Bove" > wrote in message ... > > "jmcquown" > wrote in message > ... >> "sf" wrote in message ... >> >> On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:58:24 -0700, "Julie Bove" >> > wrote: >> >>> I won't do that. I just think that is so very rude. When people >>> routinely >>> do that, I just won't call them any more. I don't have time to play >>> that >>> game of leaving a message and waiting for them to call me back. >> >> That's life. People who screen their calls will pick up if they want >> to talk to you. If they're not home, you won't hear from them anyway. >> >> -- >> I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila >> >> ********************* >> Exactly. If the person leaving a message is someone I want to talk to, >> I'll pick up. >> >> Sometimes it's someone I would like to talk to but I'm in the middle of >> something. No big deal to call them back when I'm not busy. It's not >> rude, it's reality. > > That's not always true. I have had people tell me they never answer the > phone. They always let the answering machine take it and then they make > their calls back at a certain hour that they have set aside for doing > that. Well, yeah...but a home phone is for the convenience of the person paying for it, so it makes sense for a person to call back when it's convenient for them to talk IMO. Cheri *********** Thank you, Cheri! I may not feel like talking on the phone. It's not like having voicemail or an answering machine is inconveniencing the caller. The caller may well be inconveniencing any one of us on the ng when, say, calling while we're in the shower? Just put dinner on the table? Callers don't *have* to leave a message if they don't want to. If they're friends they'll leave a message and we'll call them back. Flip side, we don't have to return calls simply because someone left a message. Heh. Jill Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:58:24 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote: > > "jmcquown" > wrote in message > ... > > "sf" wrote in message ... > > > > On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:58:24 -0700, "Julie Bove" > > > wrote: > > > >> I won't do that. I just think that is so very rude. When people > >> routinely > >> do that, I just won't call them any more. I don't have time to play that > >> game of leaving a message and waiting for them to call me back. > > > > That's life. People who screen their calls will pick up if they want > > to talk to you. If they're not home, you won't hear from them anyway. > > > > -- > > I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila > > > > ********************* > > Exactly. If the person leaving a message is someone I want to talk to, > > I'll pick up. > > > > Sometimes it's someone I would like to talk to but I'm in the middle of > > something. No big deal to call them back when I'm not busy. It's not > > rude, it's reality. > > That's not always true. I have had people tell me they never answer the > phone. They always let the answering machine take it and then they make > their calls back at a certain hour that they have set aside for doing that. > You consider that rude? -- I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
On 16/10/2012 2:01 PM, sf wrote:
>> That's not always true. I have had people tell me they never answer the >> phone. They always let the answering machine take it and then they make >> their calls back at a certain hour that they have set aside for doing that. >> > > You consider that rude? > I considerate rude. I know people who monitor their answering machines to decide if they are going to answer or not. My SiL used to do that. Our response was not to call and when she brought up the fact that we never call her anymore more we told her we didn't bother because she never answers. If she is only going to call back when it is convenient for her to talk then she can just call us when she wants. She now answers the phone when we call. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
... > On 16/10/2012 2:01 PM, sf wrote: > >>> That's not always true. I have had people tell me they never answer the >>> phone. They always let the answering machine take it and then they make >>> their calls back at a certain hour that they have set aside for doing >>> that. >>> >> >> You consider that rude? >> > > > I considerate rude. I know people who monitor their answering machines to > decide if they are going to answer or not. My SiL used to do that. Our > response was not to call and when she brought up the fact that we never > call her anymore more we told her we didn't bother because she never > answers. If she is only going to call back when it is convenient for her > to talk then she can just call us when she wants. She now answers the > phone when we call. If I was her, I would only call when I wanted to, if you didn't answer...I would assume you were busy or didn't feel like talking at the moment, but I wouldn't get *huffy* about it. LOL Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
Pico Rico wrote:
> "Doug Freyburger" > wrote: > >> It gives them permission to call you until you tell them to put you on >> their do-not-call list. Doing business once estalishes an exception to >> the general list. Telling them on a call revokes that exception. This >> process has worked for me. > > but when you tell them, they MIGHT make a note in their computer. How the rules are supposed to work is not the same as what actually happens. The complaint process through the FTC is toothless. > But the > call list is sold by someone else, and they do not learn of your wishes. It is very rare for my phone to ring for a commercial call with a company I have not done business with. I thought that was because of the do not call list. Perhaps I'm luckier than others when it comes to unsolicited calls. Perhaps callers have an irritation detector that only calls people who will be irritated. ;;^) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
On 10/16/2012 3:45 PM, Doug Freyburger wrote:
> > It is very rare for my phone to ring for a commercial call with a > company I have not done business with. I thought that was because of > the do not call list. Perhaps I'm luckier than others when it comes to > unsolicited calls. Perhaps callers have an irritation detector that > only calls people who will be irritated. ;;^) > The genuine (not scams) companies that consistently violate the DNC in my area are local home repair/remodeling companies. I was sympathetic to their need for work during the recession, so I didn't make an issue out of it for the past few years. But now that people are back to buying homes and spending money, I let their solicitors have it for violating the DNC. There's only so many times you can get pitched before losing your temper. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
On 10/15/2012 10:44 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
> "sf" > wrote in message > > No. Some people simply do not answer their phones. They want you to leave > a message and then they will call back. People have told me this. I won't > call them. Unless I have to. My Drs. assistant hardly ever answers her > phone. She did answer once. I kind of have to talk to her so I have to > leave a message. But there are times when I really need to get a hold of > her ASAP and she takes two days to get back to me. That's not good. That's how businesses - including the medical profession - deal with persons who have a history about persistently demanding immediate attention for non-urgent reasons. It's the boy who cried wolf syndrome. Once they know your game, you go to the end of the line while they take care of people who really need help asap. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
On 10/15/2012 9:52 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
> Anyway... I only have caller I.D. on one phone in here. Maybe two but I > never really use that phone so I don't know for sure. The I.D. isn't all > that great. The other day it just said, "Bothell" and it was from my local > pharmacy. A call I really did want and need. That's up to you to fix by adding all your important contacts to your phone's address book. When that number matches the number in the address book, the caller ID will display whatever name _you_ gave to that contact in the address book entry. If it's really important to you, you'll do it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
On 10/14/2012 4:07 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> That's sort of like pressing the button for the cross walk signal, > except those sometimes work. They always work, you just don't understand how they're designed to work. Pressing the button doesn't command the signal to turn on the Walk light RIGHT NOW, it tells it to turn on the Walk light when the signal next cycles to giving that direction the green light. So it all depends on timing. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
"jmcquown" > wrote in message ... > "Julie Bove" wrote in message ... > > > "jmcquown" > wrote in message > ... >> "sf" wrote in message ... >> >> On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:58:24 -0700, "Julie Bove" >> > wrote: >> >>> I won't do that. I just think that is so very rude. When people >>> routinely >>> do that, I just won't call them any more. I don't have time to play >>> that >>> game of leaving a message and waiting for them to call me back. >> >> That's life. People who screen their calls will pick up if they want >> to talk to you. If they're not home, you won't hear from them anyway. >> >> -- >> I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila >> >> ********************* >> Exactly. If the person leaving a message is someone I want to talk to, >> I'll pick up. >> >> Sometimes it's someone I would like to talk to but I'm in the middle of >> something. No big deal to call them back when I'm not busy. It's not >> rude, it's reality. > > That's not always true. I have had people tell me they never answer the > phone. They always let the answering machine take it and then they make > their calls back at a certain hour that they have set aside for doing > that. > ************** > > So? You can't dictate when someone else might want to talk on the phone. > Either answer your phone or don't; it's no skin off my nose. My point was if they do that, *I* won't call them. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
On 16/10/2012 5:10 PM, Moe DeLoughan wrote:
>> No. Some people simply do not answer their phones. They want you to >> leave >> a message and then they will call back. People have told me this. I >> won't >> call them. Unless I have to. My Drs. assistant hardly ever answers her >> phone. She did answer once. I kind of have to talk to her so I have to >> leave a message. But there are times when I really need to get a hold of >> her ASAP and she takes two days to get back to me. That's not good. > > That's how businesses - including the medical profession - deal with > persons who have a history about persistently demanding immediate > attention for non-urgent reasons. It's the boy who cried wolf syndrome. > Once they know your game, you go to the end of the line while they take > care of people who really need help asap. > Yep, when you have frequent emergencies that tend to be minor problems, they stop taking you seriously. It was about two years ago that my wife called doctor's office because she knew that I was worried about my condition and she wanted them to move my appointment up. She pointed out that I was rarely sick and only saw the doctor if I had a problem. The nurse found an appointment for me a couple days later. I saw an cardiologist two days after that and had an angiogram booked for two weeks after that. Things went bad in the angiogram and I ended up with emergency heart surgery. When I call they get back to me, |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
On 16/10/2012 5:18 PM, Moe DeLoughan wrote:
> On 10/14/2012 4:07 PM, Dave Smith wrote: > >> That's sort of like pressing the button for the cross walk signal, >> except those sometimes work. > > They always work, you just don't understand how they're designed to > work. Pressing the button doesn't command the signal to turn on the Walk > light RIGHT NOW, it tells it to turn on the Walk light when the signal > next cycles to giving that direction the green light. So it all depends > on timing. It depends on the location. Some of them do change the lights almost right away. Others....... not so much. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:53:39 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: > > I considerate rude. I know people who monitor their answering machines > to decide if they are going to answer or not. My SiL used to do that. > Our response was not to call and when she brought up the fact that we > never call her anymore more we told her we didn't bother because she > never answers. If she is only going to call back when it is convenient > for her to talk then she can just call us when she wants. She now > answers the phone when we call. I would have done the opposite and just called when *I* want to talk. -- I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:58:49 -0400, "jmcquown" >
wrote: > Flip side, we don't have > to return calls simply because someone left a message. Heh I can't tell you how often I'm glad the other person didn't pick up the phone so I don't have to get caught up in obligatory niceties when all I wanted to do was leave a message and hang up. -- I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
On 10/16/2012 12:46 PM, Cheri wrote:
> Well, yeah...but a home phone is for the convenience of the person > paying for it, so it makes sense for a person to call back when it's > convenient for them to talk IMO. Things have gotten so complicated from days of yore. lol |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
On 10/17/2012 12:08 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:19:55 -0700, sf wrote: > >> I can't tell you how often I'm glad the other person didn't pick up >> the phone so I don't have to get caught up in obligatory niceties when >> all I wanted to do was leave a message and hang up. > > Yet you wondered why so many people send text messages. Then you're > guaranteed they won't answer the phone - no niceties required. > > Now you know. > > I never knew so many people don't like other people before reading this thread. Inconsiderate to call, inconsiderate to leave/not leave a message, inconsiderate to call when it isn't convenient for the person being called, etc. It's very interesting yet strange to me. Then again, I'm pretty much a loner so I didn't know so many people here think like loners. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
"Cheryl" > wrote in message ... > On 10/17/2012 12:08 AM, Sqwertz wrote: >> On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:19:55 -0700, sf wrote: >> >>> I can't tell you how often I'm glad the other person didn't pick up >>> the phone so I don't have to get caught up in obligatory niceties when >>> all I wanted to do was leave a message and hang up. >> >> Yet you wondered why so many people send text messages. Then you're >> guaranteed they won't answer the phone - no niceties required. >> >> Now you know. >> >> > I never knew so many people don't like other people before reading this > thread. > > Inconsiderate to call, inconsiderate to leave/not leave a message, > inconsiderate to call when it isn't convenient for the person being > called, etc. It's very interesting yet strange to me. Then again, I'm > pretty much a loner so I didn't know so many people here think like > loners. Personally I prefer e-mails. For a variety of reasons. But then there are those few times when my e-mail isn't working. Mostly in the middle of the danged night which is when I am on my computer. I HATE text messages but more and more businesses are contacting people that way. One reason I hate them so badly is that the way my phone is designed, they supersede anything else I am trying to do. Once I had to pull over and dial 911 because of what appeared to be a crazed man with a death wish riding his bike through traffic going the wrong way. It is illegal to use a phone while driving here. Not that I could do it because when I am driving I seem to need most if not all of my attention focused on that. Well as luck would have it, my husband decided to send me a lot of text messages right then. I have asked him not to do this. I don't mind an important message because...well...it is important. But his messages rarely ever are. Often they are just silly one word messages. And I had to sit there as message after message came in, unable to dial 911. Yes, perhaps a fault of my phone. I think the phone is a couple of years old and no doubt they no longer make it. Also, the text messages just seem to run my phone battery right down. Another reason I dislike the text messages is that I go to places where cell phone use is prohibited. Like the Drs.office and the dance studio. Yes, I know I could just shut off the phone like I would do at the movies. But once in a while I am expecting an important call. Like from a Dr. So I leave the phone on and can then excuse myself if I need to. But then I get the idiotic text messages and either people have to listen to my phone going off or I have to shut it off. I really truly hate cell phones! I only got one to use for emergencies. And it is indeed handy for that. Especially since these days pay phones are few and far between. And I really wish that people who did contact me via my cell phone would do so only when it is very important and/or they have to get a hold of me right away. Because most of the time when it rings, I am unable to answer it. I am either driving, or attempting to check out at a store or in some area where it is so loud I can't possibly hear what they are saying. But... I do realize that more and more people are giving up their landlines and going strictly cell. My husband is such. Except for when he is here of course but he only gives out his cell number. So usually when people call our landline, it's not for him. Exception being those charities that called recently. So... Blah. I guess it beats the days when people had no other forms of communication except for letters, carrier pigeons, telegraphs or calling cards left at the door. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
"Andy" > wrote in message ... > "Julie Bove" > wrote: > >> Well as luck would have it, my husband decided to send me a >> lot of text messages right then. I have asked him not to >> do this. > > > > Julie, > > I don't pay for SMS. I get five free a month. AT&T sends me > free text messages for bill is now due and pay confirmation. > I don't know what SMS is. We used to have to pay per text whether received or sent. I kept complaining to my husband about this. Because he was the one sending the silly texts. He then got unlimited texting. > Since I can speak faster than SMS, the only useful reasons > are if you don't want to be overheard (in class? Drug deals?) > Or where the surrounding environment is so loud it IS easier > to read rather than shout. I don't have a Qwerty keyboard because I have no intentions of sending texts. I can speak pretty darned fast but not everyone can understand me. My friends are fine with it but my elderly parents do have trouble. So I have to speak more loudly for them and even spell some things out. I can't remember now what I was tryng to tell my dad earlier but he kept saying, "Party? Party?" Whatever it was, wasn't a good thing. I do remember that. And it didn't sound a thing like the word "party". Luckily my mom picked up the phone and told him to get off of it. One of those visual things wouldn't work for them either because they both have bad eyes. And when I send them an e-mail they often claim that they didn't get it. I have to sit down at their computer and show them where it is. Leaving a message on their phone is futile as well. They rarely listen to the ones in their house and never the ones on their cell phones because they never turn the phones on. > > I don't use the BlueTooth ear phone/microphone that hides in > your ear. I see people talking to themselves, not seeing the > earbud, seems as if they're talking to a multiple personality. > <G> I hate the Blue Tooth! I can't tell you how many times I have thought that the person was talking to me, or was just crazy! In fact they had to enact the "no cell phone" policy at the dance studio because of a woman with Blue Tooth. She sat there talking very loudly for the better part of an hour about the hot guy that she met online and the things that they did together...in bed and out of bed! Seriously! Her teenaged daughter was sitting there and so were some other kids (siblings of kids in the dance class) plus several moms. We were all giving her dirty looks and stuff and she just ignored us! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
"Julie Bove" wrote in message ...
"Andy" > wrote in message ... > "Julie Bove" > wrote: > >> Well as luck would have it, my husband decided to send me a >> lot of text messages right then. I have asked him not to >> do this. > > > I don't use the BlueTooth ear phone/microphone that hides in > your ear. I see people talking to themselves, not seeing the > earbud, seems as if they're talking to a multiple personality. > <G> I hate the Blue Tooth! I can't tell you how many times I have thought that the person was talking to me, or was just crazy! In fact they had to enact the "no cell phone" policy at the dance studio because of a woman with Blue Tooth. She sat there talking very loudly for the better part of an hour about the hot guy that she met online and the things that they did together...in bed and out of bed! Seriously! Her teenaged daughter was sitting there and so were some other kids (siblings of kids in the dance class) plus several moms. We were all giving her dirty looks and stuff and she just ignored us! ************ Screw the dirty looks. When people behave rudely I have absolutely no problem speaking up. I'd have told her to take it outside. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
"Andy" wrote in message ...
Cheryl > wrote: > On 10/16/2012 12:46 PM, Cheri wrote: > >> Well, yeah...but a home phone is for the convenience of >> the person paying for it, so it makes sense for a person >> to call back when it's convenient for them to talk IMO. > > Things have gotten so complicated from days of yore. lol Allow me to further complicate matters... The only reason I keep a landline is so my security system can dial out. (snip "ad" for the iPhone) Andy *********************** Yep, I *have* to have a landline due to the security system. (I just had to have the system repaired a couple of months ago.) The security guards at the gate monitor the system. They get all freaked out if the system doesn't send a signal every 12 hours indicating everything is working. They'll call like crazy, saying it has to be fixed or I'm in violation of "the covenants". I don't really give a rats behind about the covenants. Still, if I hadn't had the system fixed the guards could get in trouble for not doing their job (their boss gets copies of the transmit reports). This system doesn't give the option of connecting via a cell phone. Just as well since I never could get a signal on the darn thing unless I walked down the street with it. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
On 16/10/2012 9:19 PM, sf wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:58:49 -0400, "jmcquown" > > wrote: > >> Flip side, we don't have >> to return calls simply because someone left a message. Heh > > I can't tell you how often I'm glad the other person didn't pick up > the phone so I don't have to get caught up in obligatory niceties when > all I wanted to do was leave a message and hang up. > Heaven forbid that we should have to be nice to people when we call them. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:55:03 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: > On 16/10/2012 9:19 PM, sf wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:58:49 -0400, "jmcquown" > > > wrote: > > > >> Flip side, we don't have > >> to return calls simply because someone left a message. Heh > > > > I can't tell you how often I'm glad the other person didn't pick up > > the phone so I don't have to get caught up in obligatory niceties when > > all I wanted to do was leave a message and hang up. > > > > > Heaven forbid that we should have to be nice to people when we call them. Yep. Sometimes you have to talk to people when you don't feel like talking to anyone. -- I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:15:27 -0400, Cheryl >
wrote: > On 10/17/2012 12:08 AM, Sqwertz wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:19:55 -0700, sf wrote: > > > >> I can't tell you how often I'm glad the other person didn't pick up > >> the phone so I don't have to get caught up in obligatory niceties when > >> all I wanted to do was leave a message and hang up. > > > > Yet you wondered why so many people send text messages. Then you're > > guaranteed they won't answer the phone - no niceties required. I didn't wonder anything about text messages, assh*le. > > > > Now you know. Frankly, I don't give a damn. > > > > > I never knew so many people don't like other people before reading this > thread. > > Inconsiderate to call, inconsiderate to leave/not leave a message, > inconsiderate to call when it isn't convenient for the person being > called, etc. It's very interesting yet strange to me. Then again, I'm > pretty much a loner so I didn't know so many people here think like loners. You also now know that squirties world is so small that he thinks everyone texts everyone else. The texting feature is turned off on my phone. People can text me all day long and I won't be bothered. Don't send so called messages I'm forced to pay for. Leave a voice message or don't leave one at all. Either way is acceptable to me. -- I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Do not call
"Sqwertz" > wrote in message ... > On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:14:32 -0500, Andy wrote: > >> Julie, >> >> SMS = Simple Message System or "text messaging system." > > Short Message Service. > >> MMS=Multimedia Message system (text AND graphic combined >> messaging. > > Multimedia Messaging Service. > > The count is 0 and 2. Okay. Oh and I just got the Disney call! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Japanese call him "Filth Man". We just call him "Cappy the lying captard and proven shit eater". | General Cooking | |||
Don't know what to call it | General Cooking | |||
What would you call this | General Cooking | |||
How do you call.... | General Cooking | |||
MasterCook - don't call us, we'll call you.... | General Cooking |