Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ranaee wrote: >We never buy any thing _but_ real maple > syrup. Grade B. Our children have > rarely had anything but real maple > syrup. I think the flavor is so superior, it > is worth the expense. It has a smokey > taste that we like. Kind of like coffee. > Not to mention not having any corn > syrup in it. If I want corn, I'll eat some > corn.. I get it Trader Joes, because > that's the cheapest I can find it. It is > expensive, but we don't use it often > enough that I worry about the expense. > One bottle lasts our family of nine over > two months. And we do keep it in the > refrigerator. Gee, I'm learning all kinds of things here...I didn't realize syrup was graded?! Interesting. That may be why I don't care for the pure stuff, as the only thing I want to taste smoky, is smoked fish (yum) as I like a stronger more "mapley" flavor, like Log Cabin, and I also use Mrs. Butterworth's occasionally. I buy maple syrup for recipes that call for it, but for things, such as pancakes and waffles, I reach for the good ol' Log Cabin, which is now in bottles. Anybody remember when it actually came in a tin, shaped like a log cabin, or am I giving my age away?! :-) Judy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 24, 1:18*pm, (Judy Haffner) wrote:
> Ranaee wrote: > >We never buy any thing _but_ real maple > > syrup. Grade B. Our children have > > rarely had anything but real maple > > syrup. I think the flavor is so superior, it > > is worth the expense. It has a smokey > > taste that we like. Kind of like coffee. > > Not to mention not having any corn > > syrup in it. If I want corn, I'll eat some > > corn.. I get it Trader Joes, because > > that's the cheapest I can find it. It is > > expensive, but we don't use it often > > enough that I worry about the expense. > > One bottle lasts our family of nine over > > two months. And we do keep it in the > > refrigerator.'s > > Gee, I'm learning all kinds of things here...I didn't realize syrup was > graded?! Interesting. That may be why I don't care for the pure stuff, > as the only thing I want to taste smoky, is smoked fish (yum) as I like > a stronger more "mapley" flavor, like Log Cabin, and I also use Mrs. > Butterworth's occasionally. I buy maple syrup for recipes that call for > it, but for things, such as pancakes and waffles, I reach for the good > ol' Log Cabin, which is now in bottles. Anybody remember when it > actually came in a tin, shaped like a log cabin, or am I giving my age > away?! :-) > > Judy Log Cabin uses artificial maple flavor, I'll bet! Yeah, my mom bought it and that's what I ate growing up, but then I discovered real maple syrup! No comparison! John Kuthe... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 24, 9:31*pm, John Kuthe > wrote:
> On Sep 24, 1:18*pm, (Judy Haffner) wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Ranaee wrote: > > >We never buy any thing _but_ real maple > > > syrup. Grade B. Our children have > > > rarely had anything but real maple > > > syrup. I think the flavor is so superior, it > > > is worth the expense. It has a smokey > > > taste that we like. Kind of like coffee. > > > Not to mention not having any corn > > > syrup in it. If I want corn, I'll eat some > > > corn.. I get it Trader Joes, because > > > that's the cheapest I can find it. It is > > > expensive, but we don't use it often > > > enough that I worry about the expense. > > > One bottle lasts our family of nine over > > > two months. And we do keep it in the > > > refrigerator.'s > > > Gee, I'm learning all kinds of things here...I didn't realize syrup was > > graded?! Interesting. That may be why I don't care for the pure stuff, > > as the only thing I want to taste smoky, is smoked fish (yum) as I like > > a stronger more "mapley" flavor, like Log Cabin, and I also use Mrs. > > Butterworth's occasionally. I buy maple syrup for recipes that call for > > it, but for things, such as pancakes and waffles, I reach for the good > > ol' Log Cabin, which is now in bottles. Anybody remember when it > > actually came in a tin, shaped like a log cabin, or am I giving my age > > away?! :-) > > > Judy > > Log Cabin uses artificial maple flavor, I'll bet! Yeah, my mom bought > it and that's what I ate growing up, but then I discovered real maple > syrup! No comparison! > > John Kuthe... As I remember it, Log Cabin had 5% maple syrup when it was in those cans, then it went down to 3%, and eventually, none.That's called progress. Food chemists got better and better at synthesizing "almost" flavors. Jerry -- "The rights of the best of men are secured only as the rights of the vilest and most abhorrent are protected." - Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, 1927 ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 18:31:03 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
> wrote: >On Sep 24, 1:18*pm, (Judy Haffner) wrote: >> >> Gee, I'm learning all kinds of things here...I didn't realize syrup was >> graded?! Interesting. That may be why I don't care for the pure stuff, >> as the only thing I want to taste smoky, is smoked fish (yum) as I like >> a stronger more "mapley" flavor, like Log Cabin, and I also use Mrs. >> Butterworth's occasionally. I buy maple syrup for recipes that call for >> it, but for things, such as pancakes and waffles, I reach for the good >> ol' Log Cabin, which is now in bottles. Anybody remember when it >> actually came in a tin, shaped like a log cabin, or am I giving my age >> away?! :-) > >Log Cabin uses artificial maple flavor, I'll bet! Yeah, my mom bought >it and that's what I ate growing up, but then I discovered real maple >syrup! No comparison! Sure, real syrup costs ten times as much, what would it be expected pinheads would say about the emporers new clothes. Nowadays, through the magic of modern chemistry, artificial maple flavor can't be distinguished from natural maple flavor... anyone claims thay can can't tell nude from clothed |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clueless AOL newbie Sheldon "Pussy" Katz blathered ignorantly:
> Nowadays, through the magic of modern chemistry, artificial maple flavor > can't be distinguished from natural maple flavor Just more made-up bullshit from the village idiot. Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 19:12:00 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote:
> When you have as serious a case of TIAD as he does, > maybe he really can't tell the difference. And to think he's the one who coined that - at least I'd never heard it before he started throwing it at people. I guess that's a good example of his nastiness coming back to bite him in the butt. What goes around comes around. -- I love cooking with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 18:43:12 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote: >Clueless AOL newbie Sheldon "Pussy" Katz blathered ignorantly: > >> Nowadays, through the magic of modern chemistry, artificial maple flavor >> can't be distinguished from natural maple flavor > >Just more made-up bullshit from the village idiot. > >Bob BIAD |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 19:12:00 -0700, Dan Abel wrote:
> In article m>, > "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote: > >> Clueless AOL newbie Sheldon "Pussy" Katz blathered ignorantly: >> >>> Nowadays, through the magic of modern chemistry, artificial maple flavor >>> can't be distinguished from natural maple flavor >> >> Just more made-up bullshit from the village idiot. > > I don't know, Bob. When you have as serious a case of TIAD as he does, > maybe he really can't tell the difference. Just look at all the stuff > he's posted over the years. No sense buying sausage at the butcher shop > for more than a dollar a pound, Hillshire Farms is just as good! Vienna > sausage from a can? Spam? ....and a spam reuben is better than a corned beef reuben. your pal, blake |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Judy Haffner) wrote in
: > Gee, I'm learning all kinds of things here...I didn't realize > syrup was graded?! Interesting. US maple syrup is graded A or B. Maple syrup in Canada has 4 basic grades and some sub-grades, like Extra Light AA (our preference). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maple_syrup#Grades The B to D grades are for tourists. -- "War is the terrorism of the rich and powerful and terrorism is the war of the poor and powerless." Peter Ustinov |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michel Boucher" > wrote in message ... > (Judy Haffner) wrote in > : > >> Gee, I'm learning all kinds of things here...I didn't realize >> syrup was graded?! Interesting. > > US maple syrup is graded A or B. > > Maple syrup in Canada has 4 basic grades and some sub-grades, like > Extra Light AA (our preference). > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maple_syrup#Grades You left out important information on the US grades The United States uses different grading standards. Maple syrup is divided into two major grades: Grade A and Grade B. Grade A is further broken down into three sub-grades: Light Amber (sometimes known as Fancy), Medium Amber, and Dark Amber. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in
: > "Michel Boucher" > wrote in message > ... >> (Judy Haffner) wrote in >> : >> >>> Gee, I'm learning all kinds of things here...I didn't >>> realize syrup was graded?! Interesting. >> >> US maple syrup is graded A or B. >> >> Maple syrup in Canada has 4 basic grades and some sub-grades, >> like Extra Light AA (our preference). >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maple_syrup#Grades > > You left out important information on the US grades I did? Was I obliged to clarify that? I don't think so. > The United States uses different grading standards. Maple > syrup is divided into two major grades: Grade A and Grade B. > Grade A is further broken down into three sub-grades: Light > Amber (sometimes known as Fancy), Medium Amber, and Dark > Amber. So, two grades, A and B, like I said. -- "War is the terrorism of the rich and powerful and terrorism is the war of the poor and powerless." Peter Ustinov |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michel Boucher" > wrote in message ... > "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in > : > >> "Michel Boucher" > wrote in message >> ... >>> (Judy Haffner) wrote in >>> : >>> >>>> Gee, I'm learning all kinds of things here...I didn't >>>> realize syrup was graded?! Interesting. >>> >>> US maple syrup is graded A or B. >>> >>> Maple syrup in Canada has 4 basic grades and some sub-grades, >>> like Extra Light AA (our preference). >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maple_syrup#Grades >> >> You left out important information on the US grades > > I did? Was I obliged to clarify that? I don't think so. > >> The United States uses different grading standards. Maple >> syrup is divided into two major grades: Grade A and Grade B. >> Grade A is further broken down into three sub-grades: Light >> Amber (sometimes known as Fancy), Medium Amber, and Dark >> Amber. > > So, two grades, A and B, like I said. > But you gave the impression that was all. No mention of sub grades. You did not give enough information for anyone to draw a proper conclusion. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in
: >>> You left out important information on the US grades >> >> I did? Was I obliged to clarify that? I don't think so. >> >>> The United States uses different grading standards. Maple >>> syrup is divided into two major grades: Grade A and Grade B. >>> Grade A is further broken down into three sub-grades: Light >>> Amber (sometimes known as Fancy), Medium Amber, and Dark >>> Amber. >> >> So, two grades, A and B, like I said. > > But you gave the impression that was all. No mention of sub > grades. You did not give enough information for anyone to > draw a proper conclusion. I don't see how that's my problem. I didn't describe the sub- grades of Canadian syrup either. I merely pointed out the US has two grades while Canada (the much larger producer of maple syrup) has four. Anyone interested can simply follow the link I provided and read up on it. -- "War is the terrorism of the rich and powerful and terrorism is the war of the poor and powerless." Peter Ustinov |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:58:06 -0500, Michel Boucher
> wrote: > Actually, as I heard it, your grades A and B correspond to our C > and D. I connected and looked up the subject... even here in the US, grading is more complicated than we think. Here's what Wikipedia says: Grades US Syrup grades. Left to right: Fancy, Grade A Medium Amber, Grade A Dark Amber, Grade B In Canada, maple syrup is classified as one of three grades, each with several colour classes. These range from Canada #1, including Extra Light (sometimes known as AA), Light (A), and Medium (B); #2 Amber (C); and finally #3 Dark (D).[42] In addition, Canada #2 Amber may be labelled Ontario Amber when produced and sold in that province only.[43] A typical year's yield for a maple syrup producer will be about 25 to 30 percent of each of the #1 colours, 10 percent #2 Amber, and 2 percent #3 Dark.[18] The United States uses different grading standards. Maple syrup is divided into two major grades: Grade A and Grade B. Grade A is further broken down into three sub-grades: Light Amber (sometimes known as Fancy), Medium Amber, and Dark Amber. The Vermont Agency of Agriculture Food and Markets uses a similar grading system of colour and is roughly equivalent, especially for lighter syrups.[42] The Vermont grading system differs from the US system in maintaining a slightly higher standard of product density (measured on the Baumé scale). New Hampshire maintains a similar standard, but not a separate state grading scale. The Vermont-graded product has 0.9 percent more sugar and less water in its composition than US-graded. A non-table grade of syrup called commercial, or Grade C, is also produced under the Vermont system.[44] Vermont inspectors enforce strict syrup grading regulations, and can fine producers up to US$1000 for labelling syrup incorrectly.[45] Extra-Light and Grade A typically have a milder flavour than Grade B, which is very dark with a sharp maple flavour.[44] The dark grades of syrup are used primarily for cooking and baking, although some specialty dark syrups are produced for table use.[46] The classification of maple syrup in the US depends ultimately on its translucence. US Grade A "Light Amber" has to be more than 75 percent translucent, US Grade A "Medium Amber" has to be 60.5 to 74.9 percent translucent, US Grade A "Dark Amber" has to be 44 to 60.4 percent translucent, and US Grade B has to be less than 43.9 percent translucent.[13] -- You are what you eat, so avoid fruitcake and nuts. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michel Boucher" > wrote >>> A tourist is a tourist. What has language got to do with it? >> >> A lot, in Canada. > > Not as far as tourists and maple syrup are concerned. > True, them Frenchies in Quebec are equally arrogant to everyone not born there. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in
: >>> A lot, in Canada. >> >> Not as far as tourists and maple syrup are concerned. >> > > True, them Frenchies in Quebec are equally arrogant to > everyone not born there. It`s maple syrup, not politics, but I guess to you it is politics. -- "War is the terrorism of the rich and powerful and terrorism is the war of the poor and powerless." Peter Ustinov |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/28/2011 9:35 AM, Michel Boucher wrote:
> "Ed > wrote in > : > >>>> A lot, in Canada. >>> >>> Not as far as tourists and maple syrup are concerned. >>> >> >> True, them Frenchies in Quebec are equally arrogant to >> everyone not born there. > > It`s maple syrup, not politics, but I guess to you it is politics. > It isn't politics just someone reporting an accurate observation. No different than someone stating "it is windy in Chicago" after a visit. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:44:08 -0400, George >
wrote: >On 9/28/2011 9:35 AM, Michel Boucher wrote: >> "Ed > wrote in >> : >> >>>>> A lot, in Canada. >>>> >>>> Not as far as tourists and maple syrup are concerned. >>>> >>> >>> True, them Frenchies in Quebec are equally arrogant to >>> everyone not born there. >> >> It`s maple syrup, not politics, but I guess to you it is politics. >> > >It isn't politics just someone reporting an accurate observation. No >different than someone stating "it is windy in Chicago" after a visit. Just for the record- my experience has been the opposite in the Montreal area. We were welcomed and treated *very* well by anglo and franco -Quebecois [?] Maybe because we were there to play hockey? At any rate, several trips to different parts of Quebec- mostly around Montreal- were all great experiences for about 100 youth hockey families all told. [maybe 6 trips over 3-4 years with different teams] We stayed mostly in the english speaking areas, but a couple of the rinks were all French & they had high school kids assigned to each team to translate. We were never treated as well at any rinks or hotels in the states. Jim |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michel Boucher" > wrote >> >> True, them Frenchies in Quebec are equally arrogant to >> everyone not born there. > > It`s maple syrup, not politics, but I guess to you it is politics. > Has nothing to do with politics. Has lot to do with observation of people over the years.. Our biggest customer is in Canada (Ontario) and they have a hart time dealing with the Quebec people. We've had truck drivers from Quebec and other provinces at the same time and they can't get along with the French arrogance. Exceptions apply. I've also been treated very well on visits to Quebec, but the reputation exist for good reason. Even you comment about low grades of maple syrup for tourists fits right in. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in
: > "Michel Boucher" > wrote >>> >>> True, them Frenchies in Quebec are equally arrogant to >>> everyone not born there. >> >> It's maple syrup, not politics, but I guess to you it is >> politics. > > Even you > comment about low grades of maple syrup for tourists fits > right in. I'm not a trucker, so this obviously doesn't apply to me. "Me" comment is an observation, which I've clarified here in the past and must do so again...*sigh*. As it happens, the A grade is consumed almost exclusively locally. Some does make its way to foreign lands as gifts for Canadians abroad. But we don't hide it. It's on sale in stores everywhere. For some reason, tourists, whether French, English, Latvian or Chinese, unused as they are to eating good maple syrup, prefer the darker stuff because they *think* it's sweeter. So the lower grades are preferred by tourists and the highest grade by locals. It works out well that way. If the tourists developed a taste for the A grade, we would be in a bit of a pickle, but so far it has not caused any major international incidents. -- If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesnt help the poor, either weve got to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or weve got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition, and then admit that we just dont want to do it. Stephen Colbert (via videcormeum) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Smith wrote:
> On 07/10/2011 10:16 PM, Jean B. wrote: >> >> Here in New England, I have always thought (and read) that the reverse >> was true: those in the know got the darkest possible maple syrup. >> > > There are several maple farms near my house. I get the dark. It has a > much richer flavour. I think so too. -- Jean B. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:26:04 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote:
>Dave Smith wrote: >> On 07/10/2011 10:16 PM, Jean B. wrote: >>> >>> Here in New England, I have always thought (and read) that the reverse >>> was true: those in the know got the darkest possible maple syrup. >>> >> >> There are several maple farms near my house. I get the dark. It has a >> much richer flavour. > >I think so too. Anyone who educates themself about the process will realize that the lighter grades of maple syrup cost far less to produce, yet folks are willing to pay more for less. Those who insist on buying the lightest grades really don't like the flavor of maple syrup so would be much better off buying the imitation maple flavored syrups off the stupidmarket shelf, they'd save a ton of money. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Maple Syrup | General Cooking | |||
Maple Syrup | General Cooking | |||
Maple Syrup | General Cooking | |||
Maple Syrup... | General Cooking | |||
Maple Syrup | General Cooking |