"Abner Hale" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> You know, what's best of all, is that you COMPLETELY ABDICATED on my
> original point. I challenged you to support your blanket assertion
> that cds caused by meat are always less than cds caused by vegetables.
> You effectively conceded.
>
> You really are a twit.

And you're a name calling nothing. You've ignored all
proof posted by me and others. You would have found
your answers there (repeatedly).


--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button.

Scented Nectar wrote:
> "Abner Hale" > wrote in message
> ups.com...
> >
> > You know, what's best of all, is that you COMPLETELY ABDICATED on
my
> > original point. I challenged you to support your blanket assertion
> > that cds caused by meat are always less than cds caused by
vegetables.
> > You effectively conceded.
> >
> > You really are a twit.
>
> And you're a name calling nothing. You've ignored all
> proof posted by me and others. You would have found
> your answers there (repeatedly).

You've posted no proof. Only assertions. You HAVE no proof; only the
hysterics of activists. And it drives you NUTS, because you KNOW it's
true.

You reveal yourself, daily, to be the archetypical pothead loser. You
have little or no grasp of logic.

> > And you're a name calling nothing. You've ignored all
> > proof posted by me and others. You would have found
> > your answers there (repeatedly).
>
> You've posted no proof. Only assertions. You HAVE no proof; only the
> hysterics of activists. And it drives you NUTS, because you KNOW it's
> true.
>
> You reveal yourself, daily, to be the archetypical pothead loser. You
> have little or no grasp of logic.

You're just a name-calling troll. I refuse to continuously
repeat my logic and explanations. If you didn't
understand it the first dozen times, what makes
you think you'll understand it now?


--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button.

Scented Nectar wrote:
> > > And you're a name calling nothing. You've ignored all
> > > proof posted by me and others. You would have found
> > > your answers there (repeatedly).
> >
> > You've posted no proof. Only assertions. You HAVE no proof; only
the
> > hysterics of activists. And it drives you NUTS, because you KNOW
it's
> > true.
> >
> > You reveal yourself, daily, to be the archetypical pothead loser.
You
> > have little or no grasp of logic.
>
> You're just a name-calling troll. I refuse to continuously
> repeat my logic and explanations. If you didn't
> understand it the first dozen times, what makes
> you think you'll understand it now?

What logic? You've presented NO logic. You don't know what the word
means.

You're funny as hell, pothead.

Scented Nectar wrote:
>>>And you're a name calling nothing. You've ignored all
>>>proof posted by me and others. You would have found
>>>your answers there (repeatedly).
>>
>>You've posted no proof. Only assertions. You HAVE no proof; only the
>>hysterics of activists. And it drives you NUTS, because you KNOW it's
>>true.
>>
>>You reveal yourself, daily, to be the archetypical pothead loser. You
>>have little or no grasp of logic.
>
> You're just a name-calling troll.

It's neither trolling nor name-calling if it's on target -- and it is.

> I refuse to continuously repeat

That's all you've done to date is repeat. You've offered no evidence to
support ANY of your claims. You've been left stammering with the same
mindless twaddle you came in with when presented with overwhelming proof
that demolishes your house of cards. You were wrong that your diet was
cruelty-free, you were wrong about the disinformation you peddled in the
name of "health" and your "research," you were wrong about organics and
"veganics."

> my logic

You've offered none.

> and explanations.

You've never substantiated your claims.

> If you didn't
> understand it the first dozen times, what makes
> you think you'll understand it now?

You didn't understand anything when you came here, and you've only moved
slightly with respect to issues like CDs and organics in light of the
overwhelming evidence presented. All you've done is keep repeating the
same bullshit over and over, as if it would turn true the more you
repeated it; it hasn't. Instead, it's shown you to be a charlatan, or
worse, a true believer who gets her "research" from activist websites
rather than from an unbiased study of the issues she raises.

And you think with all that you can just cast the blame on everyone else
who's tried to help you understand the errors of your positions? What an
ingrate.

Scented Nectar wrote:
> "Abner Hale" > wrote in message
> ups.com...
>
>>You know, what's best of all, is that you COMPLETELY ABDICATED on my
>>original point. I challenged you to support your blanket assertion
>>that cds caused by meat are always less than cds caused by vegetables.
>>You effectively conceded.
>>
>>You really are a twit.
>
>
> And you're a name calling nothing. You've ignored all
> proof posted by me and others.

What proof?

> You would have found
> your answers there (repeatedly).

In your nonresponses? Ha.

"Scented Nectar" > wrote in message
news
> "Abner Hale" > wrote in message
> ups.com...
>>
>> You know, what's best of all, is that you COMPLETELY ABDICATED on my
>> original point. I challenged you to support your blanket assertion
>> that cds caused by meat are always less than cds caused by vegetables.
>> You effectively conceded.
>>
>> You really are a twit.
>
> And you're a name calling nothing. You've ignored all
> proof posted by me and others. You would have found
> your answers there (repeatedly).
=====================
You've never posted any proof you ignorant fool! Man, what a retard....


>
>
> --
> SN
> http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
> A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
> Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button.
>
>