Scented Nectar wrote:
>>>And you're a name calling nothing. You've ignored all
>>>proof posted by me and others. You would have found
>>>your answers there (repeatedly).
>>
>>You've posted no proof. Only assertions. You HAVE no proof; only the
>>hysterics of activists. And it drives you NUTS, because you KNOW it's
>>true.
>>
>>You reveal yourself, daily, to be the archetypical pothead loser. You
>>have little or no grasp of logic.
>
> You're just a name-calling troll.

It's neither trolling nor name-calling if it's on target -- and it is.

> I refuse to continuously repeat

That's all you've done to date is repeat. You've offered no evidence to
support ANY of your claims. You've been left stammering with the same
mindless twaddle you came in with when presented with overwhelming proof
that demolishes your house of cards. You were wrong that your diet was
cruelty-free, you were wrong about the disinformation you peddled in the
name of "health" and your "research," you were wrong about organics and
"veganics."

> my logic

You've offered none.

> and explanations.

You've never substantiated your claims.

> If you didn't
> understand it the first dozen times, what makes
> you think you'll understand it now?

You didn't understand anything when you came here, and you've only moved
slightly with respect to issues like CDs and organics in light of the
overwhelming evidence presented. All you've done is keep repeating the
same bullshit over and over, as if it would turn true the more you
repeated it; it hasn't. Instead, it's shown you to be a charlatan, or
worse, a true believer who gets her "research" from activist websites
rather than from an unbiased study of the issues she raises.

And you think with all that you can just cast the blame on everyone else
who's tried to help you understand the errors of your positions? What an
ingrate.