Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why to appliances all die at the same time?
We had been having trouble with our washing machine occasionally refusing to spin. Sometimes it helped to unplug it and let the computer reset. Sometimes not. The repairman came to look at it and of course it worked for him. He said it might be the door lock. He would order it. When it came in he called to let us know but said if it was working maybe we should not bother. A couple weeks later it acted up again. He came and installed then new part and it worked. That was almost about 2-1/2 months ago. Last night it screwed up again. Having spent over $600 in repairs in the last year and a half I didn't see any point in another expensive repair. My wife never liked that washer anyway. It was a front loader and needed frequent treatment for the stink those things are subject to. That's four major appliances I have had to buy since Christmas. Hopefully I won't be needing any more appliances for a while. On Christmas morning I did a load of laundry |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 10:53:59 AM UTC-6, Dave Smith wrote:
> Why to appliances all die at the same time? > We had been having trouble with our washing machine occasionally > refusing to spin. Sometimes it helped to unplug it and let the computer > reset. Sometimes not. The repairman came to look at it and of course it > worked for him. He said it might be the door lock. He would order it. > When it came in he called to let us know but said if it was working > maybe we should not bother. A couple weeks later it acted up again. He > came and installed then new part and it worked. That was almost about > 2-1/2 months ago. Last night it screwed up again. > > Having spent over $600 in repairs in the last year and a half I didn't > see any point in another expensive repair. My wife never liked that > washer anyway. It was a front loader and needed frequent treatment for > the stink those things are subject to. > > That's four major appliances I have had to buy since Christmas. > Hopefully I won't be needing any more appliances for a while. > > > > > > On Christmas morning I did a load of laundry I HATE all that Tech Enabled CRAP!! The mechanicals work fine and the COMPUTER SCREWS UP!! :-( ****ing COMPUTERS!! Not EVERYTHING needs a computer embedded in it! Like a THERMOSTAT!! All one needs is a bimetal strip! NOT to be able to be adjusted by your Smart Phone!! OK, the sparky ignitors on an gas stove are nice, but how about NO MORE GAS STOVES? Just make 100% electric stoves HOT enough to cook English Toffee, OK? John Kuthe, KutheChocolates.com... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John, why do you have problems making English toffee on an electric stove? I make it every
year on my electric stove, and have no problems at all. N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/13/2019 12:48 PM, Nancy2 wrote:
> John, why do you have problems making English toffee on an electric stove? I make it every > year on my electric stove, and have no problems at all. > > N. Â* Well , you're not a stable genius ... -- Snag Yes , I'm old and crochety - and armed . Get outta my woods ! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 11:53:59 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
> Why to appliances all die at the same time? Just to **** you off. Can you get one of these? <https://www.speedqueen.com/products/top-load-washers.aspx> Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2019-02-13 1:13 p.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 11:53:59 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote: >> Why to appliances all die at the same time? > > Just to **** you off. > > Can you get one of these? > > <https://www.speedqueen.com/products/top-load-washers.aspx> > I looked at one of them. They sure ain't cheap. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a Whirlpool top loading washer (since 2010), and have had no trouble at all. It has an
extra large tub, and it wasn't very expensive...I got it at Lowe's because they were offering a good price, a free haul-away of my old one, and a gift card. I would be really surprised if it had any kind of computer in it...it has regular dials and nothing digital on the top. My dryer is also a Whirlpool, bought at the same time. Good luck! N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2019-02-13 1:52 p.m., Nancy2 wrote:
> I have a Whirlpool top loading washer (since 2010), and have had no > trouble at all. It has an extra large tub, and it wasn't very > expensive...I got it at Lowe's because they were offering a good > price, a free haul-away of my old one, and a gift card. I would be > really surprised if it had any kind of computer in it...it has > regular dials and nothing digital on the top. My dryer is also a > Whirlpool, bought at the same time. > The old one was a Cosby, apparently made by Maytag. I wish I had known that before I bought it. The new one is a Sumsung that was on sale... at least that is the way it was being marketed. Thanks to my repeat business they are dropped $50 off the delivery and no charge to take away the old one. It is a top loader. They have a number of machines with regular looking dials, but they are actually connected to computerized controls, not mechanical switches. I had not realized that newer washing machines no longer have those big agitators. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 9:38:24 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2019-02-13 1:52 p.m., Nancy2 wrote: > > I have a Whirlpool top loading washer (since 2010), and have had no > > trouble at all. It has an extra large tub, and it wasn't very > > expensive...I got it at Lowe's because they were offering a good > > price, a free haul-away of my old one, and a gift card. I would be > > really surprised if it had any kind of computer in it...it has > > regular dials and nothing digital on the top. My dryer is also a > > Whirlpool, bought at the same time. > > > The old one was a Cosby, apparently made by Maytag. I wish I had known > that before I bought it. The new one is a Sumsung that was on sale... at > least that is the way it was being marketed. Thanks to my repeat > business they are dropped $50 off the delivery and no charge to take > away the old one. It is a top loader. They have a number of machines > with regular looking dials, but they are actually connected to > computerized controls, not mechanical switches. I had not realized that > newer washing machines no longer have those big agitators. Not only do they not have big agitators, they also use very little water during their wash cycles. It's a little shocking. My guess is that you can still get a machine that uses gallons and gallons of water. Just look for a machine that has an old style tall agitator. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 14:40:03 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote: >On 2019-02-13 1:52 p.m., Nancy2 wrote: >> I have a Whirlpool top loading washer (since 2010), and have had no >> trouble at all. It has an extra large tub, and it wasn't very >> expensive...I got it at Lowe's because they were offering a good >> price, a free haul-away of my old one, and a gift card. I would be >> really surprised if it had any kind of computer in it...it has >> regular dials and nothing digital on the top. My dryer is also a >> Whirlpool, bought at the same time. >> >The old one was a Cosby, apparently made by Maytag. I wish I had known >that before I bought it. The new one is a Sumsung that was on sale... at >least that is the way it was being marketed. Thanks to my repeat >business they are dropped $50 off the delivery and no charge to take >away the old one. It is a top loader. They have a number of machines >with regular looking dials, but they are actually connected to >computerized controls, not mechanical switches. I had not realized that >newer washing machines no longer have those big agitators. I have a Samsung. It has been churning out washing for seven people for about 3 years now. It performs well. As to the agitator, or lack thereof, it will tie your washing up in knots sometimes. JB |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/13/2019 1:52 PM, Nancy2 wrote:
> I have a Whirlpool top loading washer (since 2010), and have had no trouble at all. It has an > extra large tub, and it wasn't very expensive...I got it at Lowe's because they were offering a > good price, a free haul-away of my old one, and a gift card. I would be really surprised if it had any kind > of computer in it...it has regular dials and nothing digital on the top. My dryer is also a > Whirlpool, bought at the same time. I have a Whirlpool set about the same age. So far so good, one dryer repair. I looked at the sexy new front loaders but opted for the plain old fashioned kind because those new ones take Way Too Long to complete the wash cycle. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, February 14, 2019 at 11:18:21 AM UTC-5, Nancy Young wrote:
> On 2/13/2019 1:52 PM, Nancy2 wrote: > > I have a Whirlpool top loading washer (since 2010), and have had no trouble at all. It has an > > extra large tub, and it wasn't very expensive...I got it at Lowe's because they were offering a > > good price, a free haul-away of my old one, and a gift card. I would be really surprised if it had any kind > > of computer in it...it has regular dials and nothing digital on the top. My dryer is also a > > Whirlpool, bought at the same time. > > I have a Whirlpool set about the same age. So far so good, one dryer > repair. I looked at the sexy new front loaders but opted for the > plain old fashioned kind because those new ones take Way Too Long to > complete the wash cycle. > > nancy Agreed. My top-loader and dryer take about the same amount of time to cycle for all but the heaviest items. Pipelining the laundry on the weekend works out very well. Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nancy, my other problem with front loaders is I don't trust a thorough wash unless it uses plenty
of water. The front loaders in the laundromats use lots of water. N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 1:28:07 PM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2019-02-13 1:13 p.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 11:53:59 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote: > >> Why to appliances all die at the same time? > > > > Just to **** you off. > > > > Can you get one of these? > > > > <https://www.speedqueen.com/products/top-load-washers.aspx> > > > > I looked at one of them. They sure ain't cheap. No, they're not cheap, but they wear like iron and front-loaders are even more expensive. My last Speed Queen was 17 when my husband got tired of replacing belts and whatnot. Someone with more fortitude is probably still using it. Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:36:46 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> No, they're not cheap, but they wear like iron and front-loaders > are even more expensive. My last Speed Queen was 17 when my > husband got tired of replacing belts and whatnot. Someone > with more fortitude is probably still using it. I like their marketing "Built to last 25 years" (but 5 year warranty). 17 years and multiple part replacements isn't a glowing endorsement, IMO. My Kenmore has doubled that lifetime (33 years) for half the price (in 1986 dollars) and no part replacements or service calls at all (knock on wood). But I've only ever bought one washer in my lifetime so I'm a fortunate newbie and didn't realize this wasn't typical. -sw |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/13/2019 11:14 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:36:46 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote: > >> No, they're not cheap, but they wear like iron and front-loaders >> are even more expensive. My last Speed Queen was 17 when my >> husband got tired of replacing belts and whatnot. Someone >> with more fortitude is probably still using it. > > I like their marketing "Built to last 25 years" (but 5 year > warranty). 17 years and multiple part replacements isn't a glowing > endorsement, IMO. My Kenmore has doubled that lifetime (33 years) > for half the price (in 1986 dollars) and no part replacements or > service calls at all (knock on wood). But I've only ever bought one > washer in my lifetime so I'm a fortunate newbie and didn't realize > this wasn't typical. > > -sw > Better that average/ I've bought 4 in 52 years and the last one is still running. In the end, close to your 17 years. First one was 15 years and still running when we moved. All Maytag Bought new ones here because it just made more sense than hauling them. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 11:13:27 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:36:46 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote: > > > No, they're not cheap, but they wear like iron and front-loaders > > are even more expensive. My last Speed Queen was 17 when my > > husband got tired of replacing belts and whatnot. Someone > > with more fortitude is probably still using it. > > I like their marketing "Built to last 25 years" (but 5 year > warranty). 17 years and multiple part replacements isn't a glowing > endorsement, IMO. My Kenmore has doubled that lifetime (33 years) > for half the price (in 1986 dollars) and no part replacements or > service calls at all (knock on wood). But I've only ever bought one > washer in my lifetime so I'm a fortunate newbie and didn't realize > this wasn't typical. I expect belts and stuff to wear out, just as they do on cars. Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:55:37 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote: >Why to appliances all die at the same time? >We had been having trouble with our washing machine occasionally >refusing to spin. Sometimes it helped to unplug it and let the computer >reset. Sometimes not. The repairman came to look at it and of course it >worked for him. He said it might be the door lock. He would order it. >When it came in he called to let us know but said if it was working >maybe we should not bother. A couple weeks later it acted up again. He >came and installed then new part and it worked. That was almost about >2-1/2 months ago. Last night it screwed up again. > >Having spent over $600 in repairs in the last year and a half I didn't >see any point in another expensive repair. My wife never liked that >washer anyway. It was a front loader and needed frequent treatment for >the stink those things are subject to. > >That's four major appliances I have had to buy since Christmas. >Hopefully I won't be needing any more appliances for a while. > >On Christmas morning I did a load of laundry It's the law of nature. I had the fridge, computer and food processor all go within a week. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 6:53:59 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
> Why to appliances all die at the same time? > We had been having trouble with our washing machine occasionally > refusing to spin. Sometimes it helped to unplug it and let the computer > reset. Sometimes not. The repairman came to look at it and of course it > worked for him. He said it might be the door lock. He would order it. > When it came in he called to let us know but said if it was working > maybe we should not bother. A couple weeks later it acted up again. He > came and installed then new part and it worked. That was almost about > 2-1/2 months ago. Last night it screwed up again. > > Having spent over $600 in repairs in the last year and a half I didn't > see any point in another expensive repair. My wife never liked that > washer anyway. It was a front loader and needed frequent treatment for > the stink those things are subject to. > > That's four major appliances I have had to buy since Christmas. > Hopefully I won't be needing any more appliances for a while. > > > > > > On Christmas morning I did a load of laundry At one time we had a dream of all Korean appliances. That has pretty much fallen by the wayside. I replaced our LG front loader washer with a Maytag top loader. I like it better in operation than the front loader and as an added bonus, the new washer cost about half of what the LG cost us. Just call me older and wiser. ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/13/2019 4:15 PM, tert in seattle wrote:
> my front load washer doesn't smell because I leave the door open when > not in use, as directed - and I use the right amount of detergent > Yes. And an occasional 'boil wash' can also help. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:55:37 -0500, Dave Smith wrote:
> On Christmas morning I did a load of laundry That's at least the second time you've told us this fascinating tidbit (and I only read 1/10th of your posts). 5 years from now you'll still be reminiscing about that load of laundry you did on Christmas morning 2018. Don't forget, your wife was mopping the kitchen floor, too. That makes your post twice as exciting. ObWasher: Sears Kenmore Series 70 model 110. Did the first load in it in 1986 and it's averaged 3 full-size loads a week ever since (4 just in the past 24 hours). That's 1,716 loads. Or $.17/load + water and electricity. Not a single service call in 33 years for either the washer or the matching dryer (240V electric). The only complaint I have is when I load up the whites and I accidentally put one leg of my briefs over the agitator. Then your dick and balls flap to one side while I prefer my package to be a little more secure. I've also had 2 microwaves in my lifetime, both Kenmore. I inherited the big 'ol convection microwave we bought when I was 10 years old and lasted me until I was about 32 or 34. It was the console TV of microwaves, could fit a 24lb turkey easily. Bought a replacement Sunbeam from Walmart that lasted 24 hours before I returned it. Spent the extra $130 and got another Kenmore that's lasted 20 years. I'm gonna miss Sears Kenmore. I know Sears doesn't make Kenmore but they're farmed out to the names brands. But they're made to Sears spec - No frills, reliable, and probably better than any of the models that come out of that same name brand factory (I think the washer/dryer are a White Westinghouse, IIRC). It would be nice of this damned 33 year old General Electric dishwater would break. I've been having to rely on it much more since I have nerve pain in my arms and can't wash dishes by hand as well. -sw |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 11:53:59 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
> Why to appliances all die at the same time? > We had been having trouble with our washing machine occasionally > refusing to spin. Sometimes it helped to unplug it and let the computer > reset. Sometimes not. The repairman came to look at it and of course it > worked for him. He said it might be the door lock. He would order it. > When it came in he called to let us know but said if it was working > maybe we should not bother. A couple weeks later it acted up again. He > came and installed then new part and it worked. That was almost about > 2-1/2 months ago. Last night it screwed up again. > > Having spent over $600 in repairs in the last year and a half I didn't > see any point in another expensive repair. My wife never liked that > washer anyway. It was a front loader and needed frequent treatment for > the stink those things are subject to. > > That's four major appliances I have had to buy since Christmas. > Hopefully I won't be needing any more appliances for a while. > my flat screen tv; the colours all of a sudden they started to run together.. i thought about getting a repairman, and went all over the www for advice. i've been told that it's better to purchase a new one. so next week it's off to bestbuy. this tv lasted only 8 years. it's not the cable or the box it's the tv. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/2/2019 7:15 AM, A Moose in Love wrote:
>> > my flat screen tv; the colours all of a sudden they started to run together. i thought about getting a repairman, and went all over the www for advice. i've been told that it's better to purchase a new one. so next week it's off to bestbuy. this tv lasted only 8 years. it's not the cable or the box it's the tv. > So 8 years later, with inflation, your new TV will be twice the size and less than half the cost. Oh, the best time to buy a TV is a couple of weeks after I do. The price will be lower. I guarantee it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> > Oh, the best time to buy a TV is a couple of weeks after I do. The > price will be lower. I guarantee it. lol So true, Ed. Happened to me many times. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 10:31:29 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>On 3/2/2019 7:15 AM, A Moose in Love wrote: > >>> >> my flat screen tv; the colours all of a sudden they started to run together. i thought about getting a repairman, and went all over the www for advice. i've been told that it's better to purchase a new one. so next week it's off to bestbuy. this tv lasted only 8 years. it's not the cable or the box it's the tv. >> > >So 8 years later, with inflation, your new TV will be twice the size and >less than half the cost. Eight years is a long time for a flat panel TV, most are lucky to last 5-6 years. And they are not truly reparable other than tweaking the settings and that their tech can guide you through by phone. If it's on cable your cable tech may be able to correct it. Often settings can be impacted from a power outage, so it may only need to be returned to factory settings. >Oh, the best time to buy a TV is a couple of weeks after I do. The >price will be lower. I guarantee it. Yeah, but what if that is all the way out to Christmas, he may not want to go some eight months with no TV. We've found the best deals are at Walmart, they have an agreement with Vizio that they sell tv's without certain features like Picture in Picture, no one uses that feature anyway and you'll save like $200. We have four Vizios in the house, all give an excellent picture and are long lived. A hint to protect electronics is to hook each TV to its own APC battery back up and an APC surge protector. A battery back up prevents electronics from crashing, gives one plenty of time to power down properly... and with cheapo stupidmarket surge protectors you're just fooling yourself, gives a false sense of security when in fact they really don't work after 2-3 power surges. I have my desk top PC, all its perifials, and my 26" VIZIO TV protected with this: https://www.amazon.com/APC-Back-UPS-...r=8-3-fkmrnull |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 04:15:37 -0800 (PST), A Moose in Love
> wrote: >On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 11:53:59 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote: >> Why to appliances all die at the same time? >> We had been having trouble with our washing machine occasionally >> refusing to spin. Sometimes it helped to unplug it and let the computer >> reset. Sometimes not. The repairman came to look at it and of course it >> worked for him. He said it might be the door lock. He would order it. >> When it came in he called to let us know but said if it was working >> maybe we should not bother. A couple weeks later it acted up again. He >> came and installed then new part and it worked. That was almost about >> 2-1/2 months ago. Last night it screwed up again. >> >> Having spent over $600 in repairs in the last year and a half I didn't >> see any point in another expensive repair. My wife never liked that >> washer anyway. It was a front loader and needed frequent treatment for >> the stink those things are subject to. >> >> That's four major appliances I have had to buy since Christmas. >> Hopefully I won't be needing any more appliances for a while. >> >my flat screen tv; the colours all of a sudden they started to run together. i thought about getting a repairman, and went all over the www for advice. i've been told that it's better to purchase a new one. so next week it's off to bestbuy. this tv lasted only 8 years. it's not the cable or the box it's the tv. Just some friendly advice.... Walmart or target has like a 55' TCL (may be even bigger now) for like 3-4 hundy. I bought one about oh I dont know a year ago and it is still working well.. sure it has some quirks but it still is going strong. Oh wait I bought it about 1.5 years ago I remember now because about half a year after I bought it I went to walmart on a black friday sale and they had a vizio surround sound bluetooth speaker setup with a subwoofer for like a hundred dollars and they usually run like 250 and now I have complete entertainment system. I dont even pay for cable because there is no use for it. I get my local channels through antenna for news and the pbs stations and I add what ever network apps that I want. There are tons of free ones that would literally allow me to watch movies or TV series 24 hours a day everyday of the year without ever watching the same one twice. Now I will say that I do pay for netflix and I do have Amazon prime because I wanted the free 2 day shipping but you also get the Amazon prime movies with that, so that's a plus. The TV though updates regularly I remember my last "smart" TV was not so smart because when youtube switched their software to a newer version of html or whatever I could no longer watch youtube on my TV and that sucks because there are tons of great cooking shows on there... I watch americas test kitchen, tasty, munchies, sam the cooking guy... along with several sailing channels and several bushcraft channels... Anyway back to the TV, the quirks that I spoke of are sometimes when I turn the TV on I dont always get sound through my vizio speakers and I usually have to turn the TV of and back on again but I think there may be a problem because the two are totally different brands.... because the speaker system is supposed to turn on with the television but it does not always do that. And that is enough about that. -- ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Moose in Love wrote:
> > my flat screen tv; the colours all of a sudden they started to run together. i thought about getting a repairman, and went all over the www for advice. i've been told that it's better to purchase a new one. so next week it's off to bestbuy. this tv lasted only 8 years. it's not the cable or the box it's the tv. Well don't buy that brand again. Here's one opinion of a new TV for you. I bought an "Element" brand tv from Target over 12 years ago. It was a sale one that I had never heard of but it turned out to be an excellent brand. After 12 years it still works perfectly. The key factor here is how many hours has it run and this tv has logged way more hours than the average tv. Only time I ever turn it off is when I go to work. When I'm not working, it stays on 24/7. I don't watch it that darn much but I just leave it on. The tv is just my little bedroom buddy. heheh Point here is that hour wise this is definitely the "Energizer" TV. It keeps on going and going. If this one ever stops working, I'll buy another Element. They have proven their quality to me and I highly recommend the brand. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, March 2, 2019 at 11:13:11 AM UTC-5, Gary wrote:
> A Moose in Love wrote: > > > > my flat screen tv; the colours all of a sudden they started to run together. i thought about getting a repairman, and went all over the www for advice. i've been told that it's better to purchase a new one. so next week it's off to bestbuy. this tv lasted only 8 years. it's not the cable or the box it's the tv. > > Well don't buy that brand again. Here's one opinion of a new TV > for you. > > I bought an "Element" brand tv from Target over 12 years ago. It > was a sale one that I had never heard of but it turned out to be > an excellent brand. After 12 years it still works perfectly. The > key factor here is how many hours has it run and this tv has > logged way more hours than the average tv. > > Only time I ever turn it off is when I go to work. When I'm not > working, it stays on 24/7. I don't watch it that darn much but I > just leave it on. The tv is just my little bedroom buddy. heheh > Point here is that hour wise this is definitely the "Energizer" > TV. It keeps on going and going. > > If this one ever stops working, I'll buy another Element. They > have proven their quality to me and I highly recommend the brand. i inheritied a 55" LG. i'd rather get a smaller tv. lg's have a good price, but i don't like the fact that it only lasted 8 years. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/2/2019 11:26 AM, A Moose in Love wrote:
> > i inheritied a 55" LG. i'd rather get a smaller tv. lg's have a good price, but i don't like the fact that it only lasted 8 years. > I've seen numbers from 30,000 hours to 100,000 hours life expectancy. Reality is, no matter the brand, size, conditions of use, there will be some that breakdown much faster, others that will go much longer. That is true of TVs, automobiles, cameras, bulldozers, computers, and every other man made item on earth. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Moose in Love wrote:
> > Gary wrote: > > If this one ever stops working, I'll buy another Element. They > > have proven their quality to me and I highly recommend the brand. > > i inheritied a 55" LG. i'd rather get a smaller tv. lg's have a good price, but i don't like the fact that it only lasted 8 years. This Element tv I have is a 24". Great for sitting on the little table right near my bed. I keep volume low at night so like the 'closed captions'. Easy to read on a 24 inch from only 3-4 feet from my face. I'll probably go to a 32" screen next time but no larger. Even a 24" replacement would be fine with me. As you've seen now, all the sale ads for tvs are only for HUGE screens and are a joke for many cases. Ignore the large screens and go for a smaller one. Prices are low now especially for 32" and under. When it comes to televisions, bigger is not always better. That depends on size of your rooms and how you use them. In my small bedroom, 32" or less works well. No tv in any other rooms here. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/2/2019 11:13 AM, Gary wrote:
> A Moose in Love wrote: >> >> my flat screen tv; the colours all of a sudden they started to run together. i thought about getting a repairman, and went all over the www for advice. i've been told that it's better to purchase a new one. so next week it's off to bestbuy. this tv lasted only 8 years. it's not the cable or the box it's the tv. > > Well don't buy that brand again. Here's one opinion of a new TV > for you. > > I bought an "Element" brand tv from Target over 12 years ago. It > was a sale one that I had never heard of but it turned out to be > an excellent brand. After 12 years it still works perfectly. The > key factor here is how many hours has it run and this tv has > logged way more hours than the average tv. > > Only time I ever turn it off is when I go to work. When I'm not > working, it stays on 24/7. I don't watch it that darn much but I > just leave it on. The tv is just my little bedroom buddy. heheh > Point here is that hour wise this is definitely the "Energizer" > TV. It keeps on going and going. > > If this one ever stops working, I'll buy another Element. They > have proven their quality to me and I highly recommend the brand. > I'm not sure how much brand actually matters. Most screens are made in the same factory and most other electronics from another one or two and they get assembled with a different brand sticker. Buying today, I'd get an OLED and any other features that may be important to me. I also use a sound bar. The thinner the TV, the harder it is to get decent sound. Sound bar fixes that, in my case, I often listen to music from YouTube so it sounds as good as it looks. I have Samsung and LG TV's. Happy with both. Oh, no matter what size you want, get the next one bigger and you won't be sorry. I could not fit larger than 55" in my last house. Here, wish it was a 65". I also wall mounted it too. Safer that way. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> > Oh, no matter what size you want, get the next one bigger and you won't > be sorry. I could not fit larger than 55" in my last house. Here, wish > it was a 65". I also wall mounted it too. Safer that way. I agree with the next size up. My 24" is small and only for personal viewing in my bedroom. Even there, next one will be a 32" but no larger. If I ever put one again in my living room it would be a 48". So cheap enough on sale, these days. ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/2/2019 1:43 PM, Gary wrote:
> Ed Pawlowski wrote: >> >> Oh, no matter what size you want, get the next one bigger and you won't >> be sorry. I could not fit larger than 55" in my last house. Here, wish >> it was a 65". I also wall mounted it too. Safer that way. > > I agree with the next size up. My 24" is small and only for > personal viewing in my bedroom. Even there, next one will be a > 32" but no larger. > > If I ever put one again in my living room it would be a 48". So > cheap enough on sale, these days. ![]() > Depends on the room size. Ours is a 47" that used to be in the family room. It is on the opposite wall from the bed on top of a dresser, comfortable to watch from bed. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary" wrote in message ... A Moose in Love wrote: > > my flat screen tv; the colours all of a sudden they started to run > together. i thought about getting a repairman, and went all over the www > for advice. i've been told that it's better to purchase a new one. so > next week it's off to bestbuy. this tv lasted only 8 years. it's not the > cable or the box it's the tv. Well don't buy that brand again. Here's one opinion of a new TV for you. I bought an "Element" brand tv from Target over 12 years ago. It was a sale one that I had never heard of but it turned out to be an excellent brand. After 12 years it still works perfectly. The key factor here is how many hours has it run and this tv has logged way more hours than the average tv. Only time I ever turn it off is when I go to work. When I'm not working, it stays on 24/7. I don't watch it that darn much but I just leave it on. The tv is just my little bedroom buddy. heheh Point here is that hour wise this is definitely the "Energizer" TV. It keeps on going and going. If this one ever stops working, I'll buy another Element. They have proven their quality to me and I highly recommend the brand. == I couldn't leave my tv on all that time. We turn it on for something we want to watch and then turn it off when finished ![]() Does it never annoy you? The only thing I have running is some music turned down very low ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ophelia wrote:
> > I couldn't leave my tv on all that time. We turn it on for something we > want to watch and then turn it off when finished ![]() > > Does it never annoy you? Not having it on is what will annoy me. I like the background noise. > > The only thing I have running is some music turned down very low ![]() Doesn't that music turned down annoy you? ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary" wrote in message ... Ophelia wrote: > > I couldn't leave my tv on all that time. We turn it on for something we > want to watch and then turn it off when finished ![]() > > Does it never annoy you? Not having it on is what will annoy me. I like the background noise. > > The only thing I have running is some music turned down very low ![]() Doesn't that music turned down annoy you? ![]() == lol |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary wrote:
> A Moose in Love wrote: > > > > my flat screen tv; the colours all of a sudden they started to run > > together. i thought about getting a repairman, and went all over > > the www for advice. i've been told that it's better to purchase a > > new one. so next week it's off to bestbuy. this tv lasted only 8 > > years. it's not the cable or the box it's the tv. > > Well don't buy that brand again. Here's one opinion of a new TV > for you. > > I bought an "Element" brand tv from Target over 12 years ago. It > was a sale one that I had never heard of but it turned out to be > an excellent brand. After 12 years it still works perfectly. The > key factor here is how many hours has it run and this tv has > logged way more hours than the average tv. > > Only time I ever turn it off is when I go to work. When I'm not > working, it stays on 24/7. I don't watch it that darn much but I > just leave it on. The tv is just my little bedroom buddy. heheh > Point here is that hour wise this is definitely the "Energizer" > TV. It keeps on going and going. > > If this one ever stops working, I'll buy another Element. They > have proven their quality to me and I highly recommend the brand. I had same brand and only recenty upgraded from it. Still working, it went to lady with 3 kids and only an ol style smallr tube TV. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, March 2, 2019 at 2:15:41 AM UTC-10, A Moose in Love wrote:
> my flat screen tv; the colours all of a sudden they started to run together. i thought about getting a repairman, and went all over the www for advice. i've been told that it's better to purchase a new one. so next week it's off to bestbuy. this tv lasted only 8 years. it's not the cable or the box it's the tv. My guess is that in a few years, OLED TV will take over the market. We are now in a transition period. You can probably get a pretty good dirt cheap LCD TV now but I expect that you'd want to get an OLED model in a few years when they become dirt cheap. You're probably going to get blown away with either types of TVs. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2019-03-02 9:52 a.m., dsi1 wrote:
> On Saturday, March 2, 2019 at 2:15:41 AM UTC-10, A Moose in Love wrote: >> my flat screen tv; the colours all of a sudden they started to run together. i thought about getting a repairman, and went all over the www for advice. i've been told that it's better to purchase a new one. so next week it's off to bestbuy. this tv lasted only 8 years. it's not the cable or the box it's the tv. > > My guess is that in a few years, OLED TV will take over the market. We are now in a transition period. You can probably get a pretty good dirt cheap LCD TV now but I expect that you'd want to get an OLED model in a few years when they become dirt cheap. You're probably going to get blown away with either types of TVs. > I still use a CRT model. I have thought about getting a flat screen monster but why waste money on all the crap that passes as entertainment |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Buying Knives at Asian store - Kiwin brand available at one store | General Cooking | |||
ANOTHER APPLIANCE | General Cooking | |||
Opening a Wine Store - any store owners out there to share theexperience? | Wine | |||
What appliance do I need | General Cooking | |||
Appliance recommendations? | General Cooking |