| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Fie on you Amazon!
On 10/28/2015 9:05 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 10/28/2015 8:14 PM, Julie Bove wrote: >> > >> I would never pay a fee that high and forget. I don't even like to pay >> the $99 they now charge for Prime. > > > You don't have to pay for Prime. It is optional and evidently you saw > benefit in doing so. I pay it and receive benefits from it too. If > they suddenly doubled it, I'd drop it. There is always a tipping point > and that point will vary for everyone. > I have to agree, though it might take more than doubling for me to drop it. I like the extras, and I order enough from Amazon to make the yearly fee worth it. -- ღ.¸¸.œ«*¨`*œ¶ Cheryl |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fie on you Amazon!
On 10/29/2015 5:20 PM, Xeno wrote:
> On 30/10/2015 7:11 AM, dsi1 wrote: >> On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 2:19:43 PM UTC-10, Julie Bove wrote: >>> "dsi1" <> wrote in message >>> ... >>>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 5:24:07 PM UTC-10, Julie Bove wrote: >>>>> "dsi1" <> wrote in message >>>>> ... >>>>>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 10:15:40 AM UTC-10, sf wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:44:36 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 9:34:42 AM UTC-10, sf wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:04:18 -0400, jmcquown >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Exactly. What's that old adage? The squeaky wheel gets the >>>>>>>>>> grease.  >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We've renegotiated with Comcast every time they jacked up the >>>>>>>>> price >>>>>>>>> and usually come out of it with more than we went in with. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> sf >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Their ship is sinking. My guess is that in a couple of years, most >>>>>>>> folks will have ditched cable. The only thing we'll need is a high >>>>>>>> speed conduit for streaming on demand. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nothing is free. You forgot about all the individual monthly fees >>>>>>> they'll charge. I wanted to watch something on the tablet (had >>>>>>> to DL >>>>>>> an app) instead of On Demand and then found out they wanted to >>>>>>> charge >>>>>>> me for it. Even Youtube is charging now. No thanks, I'll go >>>>>>> through >>>>>>> a middle man. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> sf >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree, nothing is free. What I'm saying is that traditional >>>>>> cable is >>>>>> going to be left out of the loop unless they can evolve. These are >>>>>> the >>>>>> days when people will be looking to disconnect from these old >>>>>> services - >>>>>> telephone, cable, even electricity. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.techhive.com/article/2996...ee-roku-3.html >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Not me. I don't want to give up my landline. I hate cell phones. >>>>> Hate >>>>> them! Rather necessary these days but I'll keep mine only for when I >>>>> need >>>>> it. I'm fine with cable too. Hate dish and don't want to watch >>>>> stuff on >>>>> my >>>>> computer, phone or tablet. Also don't care about On Demand. >>>> >>>> Yeah right - next you'll be saying that you don't care about >>>> Facebook and >>>> Twitter. >>> >>> I do Facebook but not Twitter. I did sign up for it because the school >>> asked us to. Never figured it out. >> >> Facebook is a remarkable database of the connections between people, >> places, things, and faces. My theory is that if you have a big enough >> database, you locate people simply by doing a search of a few relevant >> words. Big data like this is gonna be a great tool for law enforcement >> in the future. No complex algorithms will be needed - just simple >> connections. >> > It wouldn't surprise me if they are already doing so. > They are. -- ღ.¸¸.œ«*¨`*œ¶ Cheryl |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fie on you Amazon!
"Cheryl" > wrote in message b.com... > On 10/29/2015 5:20 PM, Xeno wrote: >> On 30/10/2015 7:11 AM, dsi1 wrote: >>> On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 2:19:43 PM UTC-10, Julie Bove wrote: >>>> "dsi1" <> wrote in message >>>> ... >>>>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 5:24:07 PM UTC-10, Julie Bove wrote: >>>>>> "dsi1" <> wrote in message >>>>>> ... >>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 10:15:40 AM UTC-10, sf wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:44:36 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 9:34:42 AM UTC-10, sf wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:04:18 -0400, jmcquown >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Exactly. What's that old adage? The squeaky wheel gets the >>>>>>>>>>> grease. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We've renegotiated with Comcast every time they jacked up the >>>>>>>>>> price >>>>>>>>>> and usually come out of it with more than we went in with. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> sf >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Their ship is sinking. My guess is that in a couple of years, most >>>>>>>>> folks will have ditched cable. The only thing we'll need is a high >>>>>>>>> speed conduit for streaming on demand. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nothing is free. You forgot about all the individual monthly fees >>>>>>>> they'll charge. I wanted to watch something on the tablet (had >>>>>>>> to DL >>>>>>>> an app) instead of On Demand and then found out they wanted to >>>>>>>> charge >>>>>>>> me for it. Even Youtube is charging now. No thanks, I'll go >>>>>>>> through >>>>>>>> a middle man. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> sf >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I agree, nothing is free. What I'm saying is that traditional >>>>>>> cable is >>>>>>> going to be left out of the loop unless they can evolve. These are >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> days when people will be looking to disconnect from these old >>>>>>> services - >>>>>>> telephone, cable, even electricity. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.techhive.com/article/2996...ee-roku-3.html >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Not me. I don't want to give up my landline. I hate cell phones. >>>>>> Hate >>>>>> them! Rather necessary these days but I'll keep mine only for when I >>>>>> need >>>>>> it. I'm fine with cable too. Hate dish and don't want to watch >>>>>> stuff on >>>>>> my >>>>>> computer, phone or tablet. Also don't care about On Demand. >>>>> >>>>> Yeah right - next you'll be saying that you don't care about >>>>> Facebook and >>>>> Twitter. >>>> >>>> I do Facebook but not Twitter. I did sign up for it because the school >>>> asked us to. Never figured it out. >>> >>> Facebook is a remarkable database of the connections between people, >>> places, things, and faces. My theory is that if you have a big enough >>> database, you locate people simply by doing a search of a few relevant >>> words. Big data like this is gonna be a great tool for law enforcement >>> in the future. No complex algorithms will be needed - just simple >>> connections. >>> >> It wouldn't surprise me if they are already doing so. >> > They are. Yep. We have all kinds of local FB groups here. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fie on you Amazon!
On 10/29/2015 10:16 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
> > "Cheryl" > wrote in message > b.com... >> On 10/29/2015 5:20 PM, Xeno wrote: >>> On 30/10/2015 7:11 AM, dsi1 wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 2:19:43 PM UTC-10, Julie Bove wrote: >>>>> "dsi1" <> wrote in message >>>>> ... >>>>>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 5:24:07 PM UTC-10, Julie Bove wrote: >>>>>>> "dsi1" <> wrote in message >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 10:15:40 AM UTC-10, sf wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:44:36 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 9:34:42 AM UTC-10, sf wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:04:18 -0400, jmcquown >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Exactly. What's that old adage? The squeaky wheel gets the >>>>>>>>>>>> grease. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We've renegotiated with Comcast every time they jacked up the >>>>>>>>>>> price >>>>>>>>>>> and usually come out of it with more than we went in with. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> sf >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Their ship is sinking. My guess is that in a couple of years, >>>>>>>>>> most >>>>>>>>>> folks will have ditched cable. The only thing we'll need is a >>>>>>>>>> high >>>>>>>>>> speed conduit for streaming on demand. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nothing is free. You forgot about all the individual monthly fees >>>>>>>>> they'll charge. I wanted to watch something on the tablet (had >>>>>>>>> to DL >>>>>>>>> an app) instead of On Demand and then found out they wanted to >>>>>>>>> charge >>>>>>>>> me for it. Even Youtube is charging now. No thanks, I'll go >>>>>>>>> through >>>>>>>>> a middle man. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> sf >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I agree, nothing is free. What I'm saying is that traditional >>>>>>>> cable is >>>>>>>> going to be left out of the loop unless they can evolve. These are >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> days when people will be looking to disconnect from these old >>>>>>>> services - >>>>>>>> telephone, cable, even electricity. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.techhive.com/article/2996...ee-roku-3.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not me. I don't want to give up my landline. I hate cell phones. >>>>>>> Hate >>>>>>> them! Rather necessary these days but I'll keep mine only for >>>>>>> when I >>>>>>> need >>>>>>> it. I'm fine with cable too. Hate dish and don't want to watch >>>>>>> stuff on >>>>>>> my >>>>>>> computer, phone or tablet. Also don't care about On Demand. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah right - next you'll be saying that you don't care about >>>>>> Facebook and >>>>>> Twitter. >>>>> >>>>> I do Facebook but not Twitter. I did sign up for it because the >>>>> school >>>>> asked us to. Never figured it out. >>>> >>>> Facebook is a remarkable database of the connections between people, >>>> places, things, and faces. My theory is that if you have a big enough >>>> database, you locate people simply by doing a search of a few relevant >>>> words. Big data like this is gonna be a great tool for law enforcement >>>> in the future. No complex algorithms will be needed - just simple >>>> connections. >>>> >>> It wouldn't surprise me if they are already doing so. >>> >> They are. > > Yep. We have all kinds of local FB groups here. I'm not sure that we are talking about the same thing. -- ღ.¸¸.œ«*¨`*œ¶ Cheryl |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fie on you Amazon!
"dsi1" > wrote in message ... On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 2:19:43 PM UTC-10, Julie Bove wrote: > "dsi1" <> wrote in message > ... > > On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 5:24:07 PM UTC-10, Julie Bove wrote: > >> "dsi1" <> wrote in message > >> ... > >> > On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 10:15:40 AM UTC-10, sf wrote: > >> >> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:44:36 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 9:34:42 AM UTC-10, sf wrote: > >> >> > > On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:04:18 -0400, jmcquown > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > wrote: > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Exactly. What's that old adage? The squeaky wheel gets the > >> >> > > > grease. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > We've renegotiated with Comcast every time they jacked up the > >> >> > > price > >> >> > > and usually come out of it with more than we went in with. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > -- > >> >> > > > >> >> > > sf > >> >> > > >> >> > Their ship is sinking. My guess is that in a couple of years, most > >> >> > folks will have ditched cable. The only thing we'll need is a high > >> >> > speed conduit for streaming on demand. > >> >> > >> >> Nothing is free. You forgot about all the individual monthly fees > >> >> they'll charge. I wanted to watch something on the tablet (had to > >> >> DL > >> >> an app) instead of On Demand and then found out they wanted to > >> >> charge > >> >> me for it. Even Youtube is charging now. No thanks, I'll go > >> >> through > >> >> a middle man. > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> > >> >> sf > >> > > >> > I agree, nothing is free. What I'm saying is that traditional cable > >> > is > >> > going to be left out of the loop unless they can evolve. These are > >> > the > >> > days when people will be looking to disconnect from these old > >> > services - > >> > telephone, cable, even electricity. > >> > > >> > http://www.techhive.com/article/2996...ee-roku-3.html > >> > >> Not me. I don't want to give up my landline. I hate cell phones. > >> Hate > >> them! Rather necessary these days but I'll keep mine only for when I > >> need > >> it. I'm fine with cable too. Hate dish and don't want to watch stuff > >> on > >> my > >> computer, phone or tablet. Also don't care about On Demand. > > > > Yeah right - next you'll be saying that you don't care about Facebook > > and > > Twitter. > > I do Facebook but not Twitter. I did sign up for it because the school > asked us to. Never figured it out. Facebook is a remarkable database of the connections between people, places, things, and faces. My theory is that if you have a big enough database, you locate people simply by doing a search of a few relevant words. Big data like this is gonna be a great tool for law enforcement in the future. No complex algorithms will be needed - just simple connections. --- I like that I can connect to people right here in my community almost instantly. I needed a good handyman. Boom! Got one the very next day. Far better than the newspaper, phonebook or search engine. I also hired some kids to clean up the dropped fruit when my gardener broke his foot. Sadly his foot is still in bad shape but I have a line on some back up gardeners too. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fie on you Amazon!
"Cheryl" > wrote in message b.com... > On 10/29/2015 10:16 PM, Julie Bove wrote: >> >> "Cheryl" > wrote in message >> b.com... >>> On 10/29/2015 5:20 PM, Xeno wrote: >>>> On 30/10/2015 7:11 AM, dsi1 wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 2:19:43 PM UTC-10, Julie Bove wrote: >>>>>> "dsi1" <> wrote in message >>>>>> ... >>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 5:24:07 PM UTC-10, Julie Bove wrote: >>>>>>>> "dsi1" <> wrote in message >>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 10:15:40 AM UTC-10, sf wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:44:36 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 9:34:42 AM UTC-10, sf wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:04:18 -0400, jmcquown >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Exactly. What's that old adage? The squeaky wheel gets the >>>>>>>>>>>>> grease. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We've renegotiated with Comcast every time they jacked up the >>>>>>>>>>>> price >>>>>>>>>>>> and usually come out of it with more than we went in with. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> sf >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Their ship is sinking. My guess is that in a couple of years, >>>>>>>>>>> most >>>>>>>>>>> folks will have ditched cable. The only thing we'll need is a >>>>>>>>>>> high >>>>>>>>>>> speed conduit for streaming on demand. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nothing is free. You forgot about all the individual monthly >>>>>>>>>> fees >>>>>>>>>> they'll charge. I wanted to watch something on the tablet (had >>>>>>>>>> to DL >>>>>>>>>> an app) instead of On Demand and then found out they wanted to >>>>>>>>>> charge >>>>>>>>>> me for it. Even Youtube is charging now. No thanks, I'll go >>>>>>>>>> through >>>>>>>>>> a middle man. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> sf >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I agree, nothing is free. What I'm saying is that traditional >>>>>>>>> cable is >>>>>>>>> going to be left out of the loop unless they can evolve. These are >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> days when people will be looking to disconnect from these old >>>>>>>>> services - >>>>>>>>> telephone, cable, even electricity. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.techhive.com/article/2996...ee-roku-3.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not me. I don't want to give up my landline. I hate cell phones. >>>>>>>> Hate >>>>>>>> them! Rather necessary these days but I'll keep mine only for >>>>>>>> when I >>>>>>>> need >>>>>>>> it. I'm fine with cable too. Hate dish and don't want to watch >>>>>>>> stuff on >>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>> computer, phone or tablet. Also don't care about On Demand. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah right - next you'll be saying that you don't care about >>>>>>> Facebook and >>>>>>> Twitter. >>>>>> >>>>>> I do Facebook but not Twitter. I did sign up for it because the >>>>>> school >>>>>> asked us to. Never figured it out. >>>>> >>>>> Facebook is a remarkable database of the connections between people, >>>>> places, things, and faces. My theory is that if you have a big enough >>>>> database, you locate people simply by doing a search of a few relevant >>>>> words. Big data like this is gonna be a great tool for law enforcement >>>>> in the future. No complex algorithms will be needed - just simple >>>>> connections. >>>>> >>>> It wouldn't surprise me if they are already doing so. >>>> >>> They are. >> >> Yep. We have all kinds of local FB groups here. > > I'm not sure that we are talking about the same thing. I don't know. We seem to find missing people, criminals... |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fie on you Amazon!
|
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fie on you Amazon!
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 6:32:43 PM UTC-10, Julie Bove wrote:
> "dsi1" <> wrote in message > ... > On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 2:19:43 PM UTC-10, Julie Bove wrote: > > "dsi1" <> wrote in message > > ... > > > On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 5:24:07 PM UTC-10, Julie Bove wrote: > > >> "dsi1" <> wrote in message > > >> ... > > >> > On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 10:15:40 AM UTC-10, sf wrote: > > >> >> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:44:36 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 9:34:42 AM UTC-10, sf wrote: > > >> >> > > On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:04:18 -0400, jmcquown > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > wrote: > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Exactly. What's that old adage? The squeaky wheel gets the > > >> >> > > > grease. > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > We've renegotiated with Comcast every time they jacked up the > > >> >> > > price > > >> >> > > and usually come out of it with more than we went in with. > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > -- > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > sf > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Their ship is sinking. My guess is that in a couple of years, most > > >> >> > folks will have ditched cable. The only thing we'll need is a high > > >> >> > speed conduit for streaming on demand. > > >> >> > > >> >> Nothing is free. You forgot about all the individual monthly fees > > >> >> they'll charge. I wanted to watch something on the tablet (had to > > >> >> DL > > >> >> an app) instead of On Demand and then found out they wanted to > > >> >> charge > > >> >> me for it. Even Youtube is charging now. No thanks, I'll go > > >> >> through > > >> >> a middle man. > > >> >> > > >> >> -- > > >> >> > > >> >> sf > > >> > > > >> > I agree, nothing is free. What I'm saying is that traditional cable > > >> > is > > >> > going to be left out of the loop unless they can evolve. These are > > >> > the > > >> > days when people will be looking to disconnect from these old > > >> > services - > > >> > telephone, cable, even electricity. > > >> > > > >> > http://www.techhive.com/article/2996...ee-roku-3.html > > >> > > >> Not me. I don't want to give up my landline. I hate cell phones. > > >> Hate > > >> them! Rather necessary these days but I'll keep mine only for when I > > >> need > > >> it. I'm fine with cable too. Hate dish and don't want to watch stuff > > >> on > > >> my > > >> computer, phone or tablet. Also don't care about On Demand. > > > > > > Yeah right - next you'll be saying that you don't care about Facebook > > > and > > > Twitter. > > > > I do Facebook but not Twitter. I did sign up for it because the school > > asked us to. Never figured it out. > > Facebook is a remarkable database of the connections between people, places, > things, and faces. My theory is that if you have a big enough database, you > locate people simply by doing a search of a few relevant words. Big data > like this is gonna be a great tool for law enforcement in the future. No > complex algorithms will be needed - just simple connections. > > --- > > I like that I can connect to people right here in my community almost > instantly. I needed a good handyman. Boom! Got one the very next day. > Far better than the newspaper, phonebook or search engine. I also hired > some kids to clean up the dropped fruit when my gardener broke his foot. > Sadly his foot is still in bad shape but I have a line on some back up > gardeners too. I'm talking about a database of simple, one-to-one, connections between people and things. It might be possible to build a "connection engine" that will output one person's name with only a few query terms - maybe 5 or 6. If the database were large enough, it would work seemingly like magic. I ain't talking about Angie's List here. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fie on you Amazon!
On 10/30/2015 9:08 PM, Cheryl wrote:
> On 10/29/2015 10:16 PM, Julie Bove wrote: >> >> "Cheryl" > wrote in message >> b.com... (someone wrote) >>>>> >>>>> Facebook is a remarkable database of the connections between people, >>>>> places, things, and faces. My theory is that if you have a big enough >>>>> database, you locate people simply by doing a search of a few relevant >>>>> words. Big data like this is gonna be a great tool for law enforcement >>>>> in the future. No complex algorithms will be needed - just simple >>>>> connections. >>>>> >>>> It wouldn't surprise me if they are already doing so. >>>> >>> They are. >> >> Yep. We have all kinds of local FB groups here. > > I'm not sure that we are talking about the same thing. > What I got out of that paragraph was *law enforcement* (read "government") will be using social networking connections (aka FB friends) to gather personal data. And yes, I'm pretty sure they already are gathering data in just such a way from many social networking sites. <shrug> Jill |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Has anyone ordered lately from Amazon? | Cooking Equipment | |||
| ALERT! PLEASE HELP THE AMAZON ! | General Cooking | |||
| Amazon Tea | Tea | |||
| WSM $154 delivered at Amazon | Barbecue | |||
| More Amazon | Wine | |||
![Cheryl[_3_] is offline](https://www.foodbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Linear Mode
