"Dave Smith" <> I am reminded of a situation my son faced on his restaurant.
He fired a
> waiter and the guy threatened to go to Human Rights saying that he was
> being discriminated against because he was ***. He was replaced by a guy
> who was ***.
>
> brilliant. Polly

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:03:47 -0700 (PDT), Kalmia
> > wrote:
>
>>For whatever the reason for giving her the boot, I for one won't miss that
>>phony accent and all the AHA approved recipes.
>> I'm sure she can afford to retire in style and use all the butter she
>> wants.
>
> She could always go into the music business, like her identical twin
> sister did...
> http://images.dangerousminds.net/upl...s/1divine1.jpg


Or like Don Roberto's twin.

Cheri

On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:22:47 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:



>
>Have you ever owned a business?
>
>Have you ever owned a family business?
>
>Have you ever tried to fire or even discipline your brother, in the family business you co-own?
>
>There is zip-squat that Paula Deen could have done. This case will not settle -- the damage to Paula has already been done -- and at trial Jackson will receive one dollar and ten cents damages from her.
>
>The idea that Paula is responsible for her brother's business practices will not fly, any more than you are responsible for Allstate's business practices by virtue of owning shares in their stock.

I have to assume you've seen the partnership agreement and know
exactly what her responsibilities are in the business.

If you did not, you are talking out your ass too. If she has anything
to say in running the business she has some responsibility for the
management. She would have considerable clout if it is being
mismanaged and some responsibility for what happens. If she received
complaint and knowingly did nothing, she could have some culpability
in this. That is for a judge, not us, to determine.

Have you been to a stockholder's meeting at Allstate? Many
corporations make and carry out policy based on the wishes of large
share holders.

On 6/22/2013 9:53 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> Many
> corporations make and carry out policy based on the wishes of large
> share holders.

Like Kirk Kerkorian?

On Saturday, June 22, 2013 8:53:23 PM UTC-7, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:22:47 -0700 (PDT),
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
> >Have you ever owned a business?
>
> >
>
> >Have you ever owned a family business?
>
> >
>
> >Have you ever tried to fire or even discipline your brother, in the family business you co-own?
>
> >
>
> >There is zip-squat that Paula Deen could have done. This case will not settle -- the damage to Paula has already been done -- and at trial Jackson will receive one dollar and ten cents damages from her.
>
> >
>
> >The idea that Paula is responsible for her brother's business practices will not fly, any more than you are responsible for Allstate's business practices by virtue of owning shares in their stock.
>
>
>
> I have to assume you've seen the partnership agreement and know
>
> exactly what her responsibilities are in the business.

http://corp.sos.state.ga.us/corp/soskb/Corp.asp?297411

>
>
> If you did not, you are talking out your ass too. If she has anything
>
> to say in running the business she has some responsibility for the
>
> management. She would have considerable clout if it is being
>
> mismanaged and some responsibility for what happens. If she received
>
> complaint and knowingly did nothing, she could have some culpability
>
> in this. That is for a judge, not us, to determine.
>

Seems like the Political Correct commie liberal muslims who are running our country have now infiltrated all aspects of our lives. If Paula Deen aint sacred we have no culture left. I am getting real riled up over this. Who has not used the big N word at some point? Know the N folks wear it plumb out. We are a real sick society. Hopefully the great unwashed masses will arise and put a stop to the madness.

On 6/23/2013 10:42 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> I guess you haven't read my comments about places like WalMart or my
> support for unions and decent wages and working conditions for employees.

Support your own Canuck unions and keep it to yourself btw.

On 6/23/2013 12:09 PM, Fuzz Wuzzy Bear wrote:
> FN has went down hill and over the cliff A LOOONG TIME AGO! When they
> canned Emril Live, and nothing but all these ambush shows... like
> Stakeout and Mystery Diners... one of these days they are going to tangle
> with the wrong person and there will be a shooting.

You hit the nail on the head here, I completely agree.

Cooking Channel has the more "cooking oriented" shows these days.

On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 12:55:32 -0600, casa bona > wrote:

> On 6/23/2013 12:09 PM, Fuzz Wuzzy Bear wrote:
> > FN has went down hill and over the cliff A LOOONG TIME AGO! When they
> > canned Emril Live, and nothing but all these ambush shows... like
> > Stakeout and Mystery Diners... one of these days they are going to tangle
> > with the wrong person and there will be a shooting.
>
> You hit the nail on the head here, I completely agree.
>
> Cooking Channel has the more "cooking oriented" shows these days.

I like Cooking Channel too. It's a back to basics type show, but I'm
particularly fond of Kelsey's Essentials.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

On 6/23/2013 2:15 PM, sf wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 12:55:32 -0600, casa bona > wrote:
>
>> On 6/23/2013 12:09 PM, Fuzz Wuzzy Bear wrote:
>>> FN has went down hill and over the cliff A LOOONG TIME AGO! When they
>>> canned Emril Live, and nothing but all these ambush shows... like
>>> Stakeout and Mystery Diners... one of these days they are going to tangle
>>> with the wrong person and there will be a shooting.
>>
>> You hit the nail on the head here, I completely agree.
>>
>> Cooking Channel has the more "cooking oriented" shows these days.
>
> I like Cooking Channel too. It's a back to basics type show, but I'm
> particularly fond of Kelsey's Essentials.

If you grew up on Julia Child and Graham Kerr and such it has some of
that feel to it.

Kelsey compensates for her unfortunate last name rather well ;-)

Her collards with bacon is good basic fa

http://www.cookingchanneltv.com/reci...ith-bacon.html

I mentioned G. Garvin earlier, I totally enjoy his energy and skills.

http://www.cookingchanneltv.com/chefs/g-garvin/bio.html

On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:24:57 -0600, casa bona > wrote:

>
> I mentioned G. Garvin earlier, I totally enjoy his energy and skills.
>
> http://www.cookingchanneltv.com/chefs/g-garvin/bio.html

I don't think I've ever caught him... there's another black guy that I
really like. Can't tell you his name, he seems short (at least on
camera) and is a little pudgy but oh man can he cook! I haven't seen
one show where he hasn't made me salivate.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

On 6/23/2013 2:51 PM, sf wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:24:57 -0600, casa bona > wrote:
>
>>
>> I mentioned G. Garvin earlier, I totally enjoy his energy and skills.
>>
>> http://www.cookingchanneltv.com/chefs/g-garvin/bio.html
>
> I don't think I've ever caught him... there's another black guy that I
> really like. Can't tell you his name, he seems short (at least on
> camera) and is a little pudgy but oh man can he cook! I haven't seen
> one show where he hasn't made me salivate.

Hmmm, maybe Roger Mooking, who does the BBQ and grilling show?

http://www.cookingchanneltv.com/chef...r-mooking.html

I really like him too.

And I didn't realize he was one of several Canadians on this channel.
They grow some good chefs up there.

On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 15:01:52 -0600, casa bona > wrote:

> On 6/23/2013 2:51 PM, sf wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:24:57 -0600, casa bona > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I mentioned G. Garvin earlier, I totally enjoy his energy and skills.
> >>
> >> http://www.cookingchanneltv.com/chefs/g-garvin/bio.html
> >
> > I don't think I've ever caught him... there's another black guy that I
> > really like. Can't tell you his name, he seems short (at least on
> > camera) and is a little pudgy but oh man can he cook! I haven't seen
> > one show where he hasn't made me salivate.
>
> Hmmm, maybe Roger Mooking, who does the BBQ and grilling show?
>
> http://www.cookingchanneltv.com/chef...r-mooking.html
>
> I really like him too.
>
> And I didn't realize he was one of several Canadians on this channel.
> They grow some good chefs up there.
>
>
That's him, thanks! I've only seen his older shows though.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

On 23/06/2013 5:06 PM, sf wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 15:01:52 -0600, casa bona > wrote:
>
>> On 6/23/2013 2:51 PM, sf wrote:
>>> On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:24:57 -0600, casa bona > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I mentioned G. Garvin earlier, I totally enjoy his energy and skills.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.cookingchanneltv.com/chefs/g-garvin/bio.html
>>>
>>> I don't think I've ever caught him... there's another black guy that I
>>> really like. Can't tell you his name, he seems short (at least on
>>> camera) and is a little pudgy but oh man can he cook! I haven't seen
>>> one show where he hasn't made me salivate.
>>
>> Hmmm, maybe Roger Mooking, who does the BBQ and grilling show?
>>
>> http://www.cookingchanneltv.com/chef...r-mooking.html
>>
>> I really like him too.
>>
>> And I didn't realize he was one of several Canadians on this channel.
>> They grow some good chefs up there.
>>
>>
> That's him, thanks! I've only seen his older shows though.
>


Maybe you really meant Rob Rainford. He had a great show, all about
BBWing. But hold it... not short. Roger Mooking isn't exactly black. He
is Caribbean/Chinese, but he had a good show and lots of interesting dishes.

On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 18:48:59 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>
> Maybe you really meant Rob Rainford. He had a great show, all about
> BBWing. But hold it... not short. Roger Mooking isn't exactly black. He
> is Caribbean/Chinese, but he had a good show and lots of interesting dishes.

It's Roger Mooking. I know his face. Glad you know his pedigree, I
don't.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 12:55:32 -0600, casa bona > wrote:
>
>> On 6/23/2013 12:09 PM, Fuzz Wuzzy Bear wrote:
>> > FN has went down hill and over the cliff A LOOONG TIME AGO! When they
>> > canned Emril Live, and nothing but all these ambush shows... like
>> > Stakeout and Mystery Diners... one of these days they are going to
>> > tangle
>> > with the wrong person and there will be a shooting.
>>
>> You hit the nail on the head here, I completely agree.
>>
>> Cooking Channel has the more "cooking oriented" shows these days.
>
> I like Cooking Channel too. It's a back to basics type show, but I'm
> particularly fond of Kelsey's Essentials.

When is that on? I used to like "How To Boil Water". Even though I knew
most of what they had on there, I did learn some stuff.

On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 23:48:52 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 12:55:32 -0600, casa bona > wrote:
> >
> >> On 6/23/2013 12:09 PM, Fuzz Wuzzy Bear wrote:
> >> > FN has went down hill and over the cliff A LOOONG TIME AGO! When they
> >> > canned Emril Live, and nothing but all these ambush shows... like
> >> > Stakeout and Mystery Diners... one of these days they are going to
> >> > tangle
> >> > with the wrong person and there will be a shooting.
> >>
> >> You hit the nail on the head here, I completely agree.
> >>
> >> Cooking Channel has the more "cooking oriented" shows these days.
> >
> > I like Cooking Channel too. It's a back to basics type show, but I'm
> > particularly fond of Kelsey's Essentials.
>
> When is that on? I used to like "How To Boil Water". Even though I knew
> most of what they had on there, I did learn some stuff.
>

Sorry, nothing is appointment television for me. I watch shows when I
stumble into them... but you could check the Cooking Channel for
times.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 23:48:52 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> "sf" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 12:55:32 -0600, casa bona > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 6/23/2013 12:09 PM, Fuzz Wuzzy Bear wrote:
>> >> > FN has went down hill and over the cliff A LOOONG TIME AGO! When
>> >> > they
>> >> > canned Emril Live, and nothing but all these ambush shows... like
>> >> > Stakeout and Mystery Diners... one of these days they are going to
>> >> > tangle
>> >> > with the wrong person and there will be a shooting.
>> >>
>> >> You hit the nail on the head here, I completely agree.
>> >>
>> >> Cooking Channel has the more "cooking oriented" shows these days.
>> >
>> > I like Cooking Channel too. It's a back to basics type show, but I'm
>> > particularly fond of Kelsey's Essentials.
>>
>> When is that on? I used to like "How To Boil Water". Even though I knew
>> most of what they had on there, I did learn some stuff.
>>
>
> Sorry, nothing is appointment television for me. I watch shows when I
> stumble into them... but you could check the Cooking Channel for
> times.

Yeah. I am the same. Don't even watch the Cooking Channel much because
whenever I look at it, it's a rerun.

On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 01:41:46 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

> Don't even watch the Cooking Channel much because
> whenever I look at it, it's a rerun.

Reruns are fine with me because I didn't see them the first time
around.

--
I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila

On 6/21/2013 9:03 PM, Sqwertz wrote:

> That's not how it works in the media game. Food Network dumps her not
> only to avoid the bad publicity, but to gain the good publicity. And
> the quicker they do it the better. You don't sit around and field
> thousands of complaints demanding her off the air.
>
> -sw

The Food Network had no choice but to fire her. If they refused to,
then people would start a movement to send their advertisers nasty
notes, you know it would happen. The advertisers are who the Food
Network worries about, not Paula Deen.

Becca

On 24/06/2013 12:56 PM, sf wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 01:41:46 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>> Don't even watch the Cooking Channel much because
>> whenever I look at it, it's a rerun.
>
> Reruns are fine with me because I didn't see them the first time
> around.
>
I don't mind re-runs once in a while. I often miss things the first time
they are aired. Some things are worth watching again. Sometimes they
just get carried away showign the same thing over and over and over
again. The Military channel is like that. They have come decent
programs, but the problem is that the have a very small repertoire of
programming that is constantly being recycled. If you get that station
and watch just occasionally you will end up seeing the same program at
least three times. BITE tv, a comedy channel out of Toronto is even worse.

Food Network (Canada) occasionally has back to back shows where they go
through an entire season of a show and when they hit the end they jsut
start all over again. The next day it will be back to back shows of
another program. It is not so bad if it is a show I like but these days
there seems to be more crap on FN than good shows.... idiotic cooking
competitions, phony spying on employees semi reality shows.

On 24/06/2013 2:26 PM, Ema Nymton wrote:
> On 6/21/2013 9:03 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>
>> That's not how it works in the media game. Food Network dumps her not
>> only to avoid the bad publicity, but to gain the good publicity. And
>> the quicker they do it the better. You don't sit around and field
>> thousands of complaints demanding her off the air.
>>
>> -sw
>
> The Food Network had no choice but to fire her. If they refused to,
> then people would start a movement to send their advertisers nasty
> notes, you know it would happen. The advertisers are who the Food
> Network worries about, not Paula Deen.
>
>

According to the newspaper report I saw yesterday a bunch of her fans
are threatening a counter boycott to support her.

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 24/06/2013 12:56 PM, sf wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 01:41:46 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Don't even watch the Cooking Channel much because
>>> whenever I look at it, it's a rerun.
>>
>> Reruns are fine with me because I didn't see them the first time
>> around.
>>
> I don't mind re-runs once in a while. I often miss things the first time
> they are aired. Some things are worth watching again. Sometimes they just
> get carried away showign the same thing over and over and over again. The
> Military channel is like that. They have come decent programs, but the
> problem is that the have a very small repertoire of programming that is
> constantly being recycled. If you get that station and watch just
> occasionally you will end up seeing the same program at least three times.
> BITE tv, a comedy channel out of Toronto is even worse.
>
> Food Network (Canada) occasionally has back to back shows where they go
> through an entire season of a show and when they hit the end they jsut
> start all over again. The next day it will be back to back shows of
> another program. It is not so bad if it is a show I like but these days
> there seems to be more crap on FN than good shows.... idiotic cooking
> competitions, phony spying on employees semi reality shows.


I'm completely bored with most cooking shows anymore, nothing much new under
the sun at all. Once in awhile there was a new gadget I hadn't seen, but
other than that...

Cheri

On 24/06/2013 4:10 PM, Cheri wrote:

>
> I'm completely bored with most cooking shows anymore, nothing much new
> under the sun at all. Once in awhile there was a new gadget I hadn't
> seen, but other than that...
>
I am starting to find better cooking shows on network television than on
the Food Network. I have no use for the contests and quasi reality shows.

On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:10:15 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

> On 24/06/2013 2:26 PM, Ema Nymton wrote:
> > On 6/21/2013 9:03 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> >
> >> That's not how it works in the media game. Food Network dumps her not
> >> only to avoid the bad publicity, but to gain the good publicity. And
> >> the quicker they do it the better. You don't sit around and field
> >> thousands of complaints demanding her off the air.
> >>
> >> -sw
> >
> > The Food Network had no choice but to fire her. If they refused to,
> > then people would start a movement to send their advertisers nasty
> > notes, you know it would happen. The advertisers are who the Food
> > Network worries about, not Paula Deen.
> >
> >
>
> According to the newspaper report I saw yesterday a bunch of her fans
> are threatening a counter boycott to support her.

You said up-thread that you're seeing more cooking shows on network
television, so she will be able to take her party elsewhere if she's
popular enough.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
news
> On 24/06/2013 4:10 PM, Cheri wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm completely bored with most cooking shows anymore, nothing much new
>> under the sun at all. Once in awhile there was a new gadget I hadn't
>> seen, but other than that...
>>
> I am starting to find better cooking shows on network television than on
> the Food Network. I have no use for the contests and quasi reality shows.
>


Me too and me either.

Cheri

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 01:41:46 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>> Don't even watch the Cooking Channel much because
>> whenever I look at it, it's a rerun.
>
> Reruns are fine with me because I didn't see them the first time
> around.

But I just looked and don't really see anything of interest. Not into
Mario or Emeril.

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 24/06/2013 12:56 PM, sf wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 01:41:46 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Don't even watch the Cooking Channel much because
>>> whenever I look at it, it's a rerun.
>>
>> Reruns are fine with me because I didn't see them the first time
>> around.
>>
> I don't mind re-runs once in a while. I often miss things the first time
> they are aired. Some things are worth watching again. Sometimes they just
> get carried away showign the same thing over and over and over again. The
> Military channel is like that. They have come decent programs, but the
> problem is that the have a very small repertoire of programming that is
> constantly being recycled. If you get that station and watch just
> occasionally you will end up seeing the same program at least three times.
> BITE tv, a comedy channel out of Toronto is even worse.
>
> Food Network (Canada) occasionally has back to back shows where they go
> through an entire season of a show and when they hit the end they jsut
> start all over again. The next day it will be back to back shows of
> another program. It is not so bad if it is a show I like but these days
> there seems to be more crap on FN than good shows.... idiotic cooking
> competitions, phony spying on employees semi reality shows.

I don't like most reruns but if they are most any of the shows that aired on
PBS or Create, chances are, I will watch them again and again. With some
exceptions. Not really into Joanne Weir or Martha Stewart. But Martin Yan,
Ming Tsai, Julia Child, Jacques Pepin and some of the others? I will watch
until I've memorized it!

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
> I'm completely bored with most cooking shows anymore, nothing much new
> under the sun at all. Once in awhile there was a new gadget I hadn't seen,
> but other than that...

That's true too. I can't say that I learn too much from those shows any
more. But there are some people I just like to watch!

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
news
> On 24/06/2013 4:10 PM, Cheri wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm completely bored with most cooking shows anymore, nothing much new
>> under the sun at all. Once in awhile there was a new gadget I hadn't
>> seen, but other than that...
>>
> I am starting to find better cooking shows on network television than on
> the Food Network. I have no use for the contests and quasi reality shows.

The ones I couldn't stand were when they sent the people off to some remote
area and then they had to do strange things to get the food, then maybe
build a place to prepare and cook the food. And often they were working
with native ingredients that they were not familiar with. It got to be less
about cooking and more about who could run faster, swim faster, dive deeper,
climb higher, etc.

On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:06:57 -0700, sf > wrote:

>On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:10:15 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>
>> On 24/06/2013 2:26 PM, Ema Nymton wrote:
>> > On 6/21/2013 9:03 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>> >
>> >> That's not how it works in the media game. Food Network dumps her not
>> >> only to avoid the bad publicity, but to gain the good publicity. And
>> >> the quicker they do it the better. You don't sit around and field
>> >> thousands of complaints demanding her off the air.
>> >>
>> >> -sw
>> >
>> > The Food Network had no choice but to fire her. If they refused to,
>> > then people would start a movement to send their advertisers nasty
>> > notes, you know it would happen. The advertisers are who the Food
>> > Network worries about, not Paula Deen.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> According to the newspaper report I saw yesterday a bunch of her fans
>> are threatening a counter boycott to support her.
>
>You said up-thread that you're seeing more cooking shows on network
>television, so she will be able to take her party elsewhere if she's
>popular enough.

An industry expert says there is no chance of that. Her ham contract
has dropped her, her publishers are declining to publish new book, QVC
is considering and GMC or somebody and Home Depot have said they will
continue to advertise on FN but they are insisting that their ads do
not appear anywhere near her show. (Her show is off the air here)
Look for Paula to tell all on Wednesday on the Today show.
Janet US

On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:28:55 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On 24/06/2013 12:56 PM, sf wrote:
> >> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 01:41:46 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> Don't even watch the Cooking Channel much because
> >>> whenever I look at it, it's a rerun.
> >>
> >> Reruns are fine with me because I didn't see them the first time
> >> around.
> >>
> > I don't mind re-runs once in a while. I often miss things the first time
> > they are aired. Some things are worth watching again. Sometimes they just
> > get carried away showign the same thing over and over and over again. The
> > Military channel is like that. They have come decent programs, but the
> > problem is that the have a very small repertoire of programming that is
> > constantly being recycled. If you get that station and watch just
> > occasionally you will end up seeing the same program at least three times.
> > BITE tv, a comedy channel out of Toronto is even worse.
> >
> > Food Network (Canada) occasionally has back to back shows where they go
> > through an entire season of a show and when they hit the end they jsut
> > start all over again. The next day it will be back to back shows of
> > another program. It is not so bad if it is a show I like but these days
> > there seems to be more crap on FN than good shows.... idiotic cooking
> > competitions, phony spying on employees semi reality shows.
>
> I don't like most reruns but if they are most any of the shows that aired on
> PBS or Create, chances are, I will watch them again and again. With some
> exceptions. Not really into Joanne Weir or Martha Stewart. But Martin Yan,
> Ming Tsai, Julia Child, Jacques Pepin and some of the others? I will watch
> until I've memorized it!
>
Aren't they on PBS?

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:28:55 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On 24/06/2013 12:56 PM, sf wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 01:41:46 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Don't even watch the Cooking Channel much because
>> >>> whenever I look at it, it's a rerun.
>> >>
>> >> Reruns are fine with me because I didn't see them the first time
>> >> around.
>> >>
>> > I don't mind re-runs once in a while. I often miss things the first
>> > time
>> > they are aired. Some things are worth watching again. Sometimes they
>> > just
>> > get carried away showign the same thing over and over and over again.
>> > The
>> > Military channel is like that. They have come decent programs, but the
>> > problem is that the have a very small repertoire of programming that is
>> > constantly being recycled. If you get that station and watch just
>> > occasionally you will end up seeing the same program at least three
>> > times.
>> > BITE tv, a comedy channel out of Toronto is even worse.
>> >
>> > Food Network (Canada) occasionally has back to back shows where they go
>> > through an entire season of a show and when they hit the end they jsut
>> > start all over again. The next day it will be back to back shows of
>> > another program. It is not so bad if it is a show I like but these days
>> > there seems to be more crap on FN than good shows.... idiotic cooking
>> > competitions, phony spying on employees semi reality shows.
>>
>> I don't like most reruns but if they are most any of the shows that aired
>> on
>> PBS or Create, chances are, I will watch them again and again. With some
>> exceptions. Not really into Joanne Weir or Martha Stewart. But Martin
>> Yan,
>> Ming Tsai, Julia Child, Jacques Pepin and some of the others? I will
>> watch
>> until I've memorized it!
>>
> Aren't they on PBS?

Yes. That's what I said above. PBS or Create which is run by PBS.

"Janet Bostwick" > wrote in message
...
> An industry expert says there is no chance of that. Her ham contract
> has dropped her, her publishers are declining to publish new book, QVC
> is considering and GMC or somebody and Home Depot have said they will
> continue to advertise on FN but they are insisting that their ads do
> not appear anywhere near her show. (Her show is off the air here)
> Look for Paula to tell all on Wednesday on the Today show.
> Janet US

Looks like they have already taken her off of The Food Network. Twice today
her show was listed and twice they put something else on.