Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
![]() In your opinion, is this the best way to baste a chicken? http://img.chan4chan.com/img/2009-05...3442652795.jpg -- http://www.culinarytip.com Samantha F. McKenzie 21 Haslemere Road BRISTOL BS9 0HE |
|
|||
![]()
Samantha F. McKenzie wrote in message
... In your opinion, is this the best way to baste a chicken? Remind me not to come to dinner at your house. KK |
|
|||
![]()
On 17/06/2009 12:36, Samantha F. McKenzie wrote:
In your opinion, is this the best way to baste a chicken? Who are you asking? uk.food+drink.misc? rec.food.cooking? uk.media.tv.misc? uk.tech.digital-tv? uk.d-i-y? or uk.people.silversurfers? Answers on a postcard to and FollowUps set to alt.testgroup -- wtwjgc (Joe) |
|
|||
![]() "Samantha F. McKenzie" wrote In your opinion, is this the best way to baste a chicken? http://img.chan4chan.com/img/2009-05...3442652795.jpg http://www.culinarytip.com Samantha F. McKenzie 21 Haslemere Road BRISTOL BS9 0HE That's the wrong kind of "tasty bird" for that sort of carry on! |
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:36:08 +0000 (UTC), "Samantha F. McKenzie"
wrote: In your opinion, is this the best way to baste a chicken? http://img.chan4chan.com/img/2009-05...3442652795.jpg Did you mean masterbaste? I note not much basting going to occur while the master baster is wearing one of those rubber johnny things -- Cheers Peter |
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:07:23 +0100, "Kaptain Kremin"
wrote: Samantha F. McKenzie wrote in message ... In your opinion, is this the best way to baste a chicken? Remind me not to come to dinner at your house. KK What makes you think the invite would be for dinner ???? LOL -------------- Any posting using my name and/or e-mail address but other than by newsindividual.net is not being posted by me and should be disregarded . Remove NOSPAM to reply by e-mail |
|
|||
![]() Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, Part 5, Section 63 It's illegal to possess images of: "(d) a person performing or appearing to perform an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive)," No mention is made as to whether cooking is a mitagating factor. I am not joking, clear your web cache. -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
|
|||
![]() "Graham." wrote Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, Part 5, Section 63 It's illegal to possess images of: "(d) a person performing or appearing to perform an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive)," No mention is made as to whether cooking is a mitagating factor. I am not joking, clear your web cache. -- Graham. Good point Graham But surely it must be a mitigating factor that the image has been posted to a group where such images do not usually arise. Also there is no indication within the post or in the filename as to what the image contained. I would suspect that the majority of readers will have accessed this image in all innocence, seeing how this group is not known for images of this nature. The DIY element justifying this post is tenuous, being based on inuendo rather than genuine relevant content! |
|
|||
![]() "Graham." wrote in message ... Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, Part 5, Section 63 It's illegal to possess images of: "(d) a person performing or appearing to perform an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive)," No mention is made as to whether cooking is a mitagating factor. I am not joking, clear your web cache. Cleared!! On the other hand, there's no evidence that this was a real chicken, and not an imitation one! I suppose imitations are covered by the act from the choice of the word "appearing"? If so that counts out lots of photos containing rabbits! |
|
|||
![]() "TheScullster" wrote in message . uk... "Graham." wrote Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, Part 5, Section 63 It's illegal to possess images of: "(d) a person performing or appearing to perform an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive)," No mention is made as to whether cooking is a mitagating factor. I am not joking, clear your web cache. -- Graham. Good point Graham But surely it must be a mitigating factor that the image has been posted to a group where such images do not usually arise. Also there is no indication within the post or in the filename as to what the image contained. I would suspect that the majority of readers will have accessed this image in all innocence, seeing how this group is not known for images of this nature. The DIY element justifying this post is tenuous, being based on inuendo rather than genuine relevant content! That's why you must delete it in a "reasonable time" (undefined) 65 Defences: general Cut (c) that the person- (i) was sent the image concerned without any prior request having been made by or on behalf of the person, and (ii) did not keep it for an unreasonable time. -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
|
|||
![]() "Fredxx" wrote in message ... "Graham." wrote in message ... Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, Part 5, Section 63 It's illegal to possess images of: "(d) a person performing or appearing to perform an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive)," No mention is made as to whether cooking is a mitagating factor. I am not joking, clear your web cache. Cleared!! On the other hand, there's no evidence that this was a real chicken, and not an imitation one! I suppose imitations are covered by the act from the choice of the word "appearing"? If so that counts out lots of photos containing rabbits! The act has a lot to say about "pseudo images" (cartoon drawings etc.) but in relation to a different catogry of offence. -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
|
|||
![]()
At least you know, indeed we all know where her house is. I don't think I'd
put my mail address in a news post. Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ "Kaptain Kremin" wrote in message ... Samantha F. McKenzie wrote in message ... In your opinion, is this the best way to baste a chicken? Remind me not to come to dinner at your house. KK |
|
|||
![]()
On 17 June, 12:36, "Samantha F. McKenzie"
wrote: In your opinion, is this the best way to baste a chicken? http://img.chan4chan.com/img/2009-05...3442652795.jpg -- http://www.culinarytip.com Samantha F. McKenzie 21 Haslemere Road BRISTOL BS9 0HE No need.. http://www.seriouseats.com/2009/04/w...aste-test.html |
|
|||
![]() "TheScullster" wrote in message . uk... "Samantha F. McKenzie" wrote In your opinion, is this the best way to baste a chicken? http://img.chan4chan.com/img/2009-05...3442652795.jpg http://www.culinarytip.com Samantha F. McKenzie 21 Haslemere Road BRISTOL BS9 0HE That's the wrong kind of "tasty bird" for that sort of carry on! Why use the condom? 1. It is dead and cannot get pregnant 2. It is a chicken and a male human cannot get it pregnant 3. It takes away the feeling Adam |
|
|||
![]() "Samantha F. McKenzie" wrote in message ... In your opinion, is this the best way to baste a chicken? http://img.chan4chan.com/img/2009-05...3442652795.jpg -- http://www.culinarytip.com Samantha F. McKenzie 21 Haslemere Road BRISTOL BS9 0HE I hate fukin chicken.......... |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Basting in the Moonlight | Barbecue | |||
Basting, how much, how often and when? | Barbecue | |||
Basting brushes | Barbecue | |||
Is basting necessary? | General Cooking | |||
Basting with bacon | Barbecue |