Basting a Chicken???
"Fredxx" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Graham." > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, Part 5, Section 63
>>
>> It's illegal to possess images of:
>>
>> "(d) a person performing or appearing to perform an act of intercourse or
>> oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive),"
>>
>> No mention is made as to whether cooking is a mitagating factor.
>> I am not joking, clear your web cache.
>
> Cleared!!
>
> On the other hand, there's no evidence that this was a real chicken, and
> not an imitation one! I suppose imitations are covered by the act from
> the choice of the word "appearing"? If so that counts out lots of photos
> containing rabbits!
The act has a lot to say about "pseudo images" (cartoon drawings etc.)
but in relation to a different catogry of offence.
--
Graham.
%Profound_observation%
|