View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to uk.food+drink.misc,rec.food.cooking,uk.media.tv.misc,uk.tech.digital-tv,uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers
Graham. Graham. is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Basting a Chicken???



"Fredxx" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Graham." > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, Part 5, Section 63
>>
>> It's illegal to possess images of:
>>
>> "(d) a person performing or appearing to perform an act of intercourse or
>> oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive),"
>>
>> No mention is made as to whether cooking is a mitagating factor.
>> I am not joking, clear your web cache.

>
> Cleared!!
>
> On the other hand, there's no evidence that this was a real chicken, and
> not an imitation one! I suppose imitations are covered by the act from
> the choice of the word "appearing"? If so that counts out lots of photos
> containing rabbits!


The act has a lot to say about "pseudo images" (cartoon drawings etc.)
but in relation to a different catogry of offence.

--
Graham.

%Profound_observation%