Dan Krueger wrote:

> Agreed. I have seem some very offesive stuff here - i.e...
>
> http://itc.boisestate.edu/images/sta...vin_Wilson.jpg

OMG WILL YOU PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!1!!!ELEVENTYONE!!!1!

*Kevin S. Wilson* rescyou at spro.net _wrote:_
<mailto:rec.food.baking%40mail.otherwhen.com?Subje ct=Finding%20Recipes&In-Reply-To=>

> My kids ARE reading this list. Well, not right this minute, but they
read it sometimes as part of their homework. I home-school them, and
> they read the cooking groups as part of their studies in Domestic
Arts (cooking, cleaning, interior decoration, and family values). So I
> would appreciate it if ALL of you would watch your language.

I feel like I just swallowed some trolls' bait hook line and sinker...
but here goes anyway....

I'm reminded of a George Carlin comment. He saw a window sticker that
read, "Drive carefully, baby on board!" He ranted, "You mean I have to
change the way I drive because you didn't practice safe sex?"

Similarly, I don't let my kids walk on the street with the strip clubs
and tit bars. There's nothing there they need to see. I know what
would happen if I walked by and asked them to change the signs outside
and to put some clothes on those people. They aren't gonna change.

You can't change the world to protect your children.

usenet is a spotty neighborhood, and at any time even the "nicest" news
group can be overrun with rudeness from outside or a sudden personality
clash that starts a flame war. It's not a great area for kids. If you
use a net nanny, I'd guess about 2/3 of usenet is blocked at any given
moment. Often, there's a reason for it.

However, there IS such a thing as being overprotective. Many people
hide their children away, making sure they never learn that there are
people out there who are not like mommy and daddy, people who do things
differently, people who go to other churches (or, gasp!, none at all),
people who have skins of different colors, people who believe in
evoloution, people who don't feel that scholastic achievement is the
only reason we were put on this earth. And when the kids finally learn
these things.... all bets are off. It often happens when they go off to
college... they are exposed to strange new ideas, and mom and dad aren't
there to corral them. And then, they wallow in deparvity. They stay
out until 10:00 PM. They drink grape nehi. They wear short skirts.
They don't spend the entire Sabbath in prayer.

A psychology teacher I took a class or three from commented that you
don't temper steel by never stressing it. You have to heat it and cool
it. If you shield children their whole lives, they become hot house
flowers, unable to withstand the first heavy wind they encounter. "If
you want to raise mentally healthy children, you have to traumatize the
shit out of 'em!" he opined. I think he was right.

Mike

<http://www.otherwhen.com/pipermail/rec.food.baking/2005-June/005823.html>

Mark Edwards > wrote:
>No cluons were harmed when "Otto Bahn"
>>"You don't boil underwear with your pasta," my mom used to say.
>
>We need more info on your mom's early lingerie/pasta experiments, and
>how thay affected your family's health.

See the recently returned Tamara's experimental recipe in t'other thread,
NOW INVOLVING MORE GARLIC.

That is all.

Dave "and maybe someday Fool will rush in again too" DeLaney
--
\/David DeLaney posting from "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.

Nick > wrote:
>Otto Bahn wrote:
>> Nick wrote
>>> For starters this isn't a chat room. This is Usenet.
>>
>> What's the difference...?
>
>Usenet is taller.

Nick wins. Fatality.

Dave "THE STAPLER IS BEHIND ALL OF US" DeLaney
--
\/David DeLaney posting from "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Marc Goodman wrote:

> Otto Bahn wrote:
>> Trolls are like chigger bites.
>
> They feel good when you rub them with calamine lotion?
> FNARR!

IT DOES THIS WHENEVER IT IS TOLD!!

--Jeremy

--

Jeremy Impson
jdimpson can be contacted at acm dot org
http://impson.tzo.com/~jdimpson

(David DeLaney) writes:

> Dave "and maybe someday Fool will rush in again too" DeLaney

He should. I haven't seen any angels here in a decade or so.

--
- Doctroid Doctroid Holmes <http://www.richholmes.net/doctroid/>

"Maybe I should ask sane people." -- Dag ]gren

"Otto Bahn" > wrote in message
...
> "Shaun aRe" > wrote
>
> > > > >>In this case, asking stupid-newbie questions. In others, offerring
> > > > >>opinions extremely out of the norm for the newsgroup, like asking
for
> > > > >>recipes for wokking a cat, in a cat-lovers' group...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd think it'd wok just like chicken.
> > > >
> > > > I think cat would be a red meat, like dolphin or monkey,
> > > > not a white meat like bunny or aligator.
> > >
> > > It thought it was a chicken substitute in East Asia...?
> > > Either way, that's a horrible thing to do a domesticated
> > > aminal.
> >
> > I think you are supposed to throw them out of the house for a while
until
> > they go wild, then eat them.
>
> You probably get leaner meat that way.

Hmmm, and so less flavour - I shall have to have a rethink.



Shaun aRe - Fat Cat Fry! YAY!

"Nick" > wrote in message
...
> Shaun aRe wrote:
>
> >
> > "Rose Marie Holt" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> In article >,
> >> Nick > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I was comparing the quality of the trolling to the quality of Sandra
> >>> Lee's (semi-homemade) cooking. (Perhaps you thought I meant Sarah
> >>> Lee?)
> >>
> >> ITYM Sara Lee. There are more?
> >>
> >> I like pie.
> >
> > Stick around r.f.c. for a while, look for posts by 'Ubiquitous', or just
> > google Sandra Lee Semi Homemade - the woman is crazy and thinks she is
> > cooking, by adding packet A to box B and shaking it around some. Etc.
>
> And oh does she shake it around.

I have heard she's a good lucking woman who likes to lay on the faux
sexiness somewhat, but I have yet to see what she looks like (I don't care).


Shaun aRe

You are indeed are really quite mad. If you weren't, you'd realise it.


Shaun aRe
--
Sometimes, the true and living thought bubbling rapidly up from the
depths of the mind, surfaces with a severe case of the Bends.



"Dan Krueger" > wrote in message
nk.net...
> No, YOU'RE thinking of pastries, big boy...
>
> http://itc.boisestate.edu/images/sta...vin_Wilson.jpg
>
> Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 02:41:34 GMT, Nick >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I was comparing the quality of the trolling to the quality of Sandra
> >>Lee's (semi-homemade) cooking. (Perhaps you thought I meant Sarah
> >>Lee?)
> >
> >
> > You're thinking of Sandra Dee's line of "homemade" pastries.
> >

Shaun aRe wrote:

>
> "Nick" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Shaun aRe wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Rose Marie Holt" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> In article >,
>>>> Nick > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I was comparing the quality of the trolling to the quality of
>>>>> Sandra Lee's (semi-homemade) cooking. (Perhaps you thought I
>>>>> meant Sarah Lee?)
>>>>
>>>> ITYM Sara Lee. There are more?
>>>>
>>>> I like pie.
>>>
>>> Stick around r.f.c. for a while, look for posts by 'Ubiquitous', or
>>> just google Sandra Lee Semi Homemade - the woman is crazy and
>>> thinks she is cooking, by adding packet A to box B and shaking it
>>> around some. Etc.
>>
>> And oh does she shake it around.
>
> I have heard she's a good lucking woman who likes to lay on the faux
> sexiness somewhat, but I have yet to see what she looks like (I don't
> care).

Oh, there is no question about it. She is *very* good looking.
http://www.foodnetwork.com/food/show..._14521,00.html

"Nick" > wrote in message
...
> Shaun aRe wrote:

> >> And oh does she shake it around.
> >
> > I have heard she's a good lucking woman who likes to lay on the faux
> > sexiness somewhat, but I have yet to see what she looks like (I don't
> > care).
>
> Oh, there is no question about it. She is *very* good looking.
> http://www.foodnetwork.com/food/show..._14521,00.html

She'd make one half of a decent pair of bookends I suppose!

',;~}~


Shaun aRe
--
Whenever I talk in circles, all the squares go elsewhere.

"cathyxyz" > wrote in message
...
> Nick wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I just came to this group yesterday but from what I have seen in my
short
> > time here I can give you a concrete example of a troll: Sheldon.
>
> Oops! Now you've done it.... hope you have a bullet-proof newsreader
> Cathy

Anyone is actually scared of Shelly?!? WTF?!? Oh well... ',;~}~



Shaun aRe

"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:52:23 GMT, sarah bennett
> > wrote:
>
> >Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
> >> On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:30:09 -0500, shelly >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 21:36:54 GMT,
> >>>(AlleyGator) wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Damn, you're a juvenile pice of shit. See ya.
> >>>
> >>>you shouldn't swear. kids could be reading this list.
> >>
> >>
> >> My kids ARE reading this list. Well, not right this minute, but they
> >> read it sometimes as part of their homework. I home-school them, and
> >> they read the cooking groups as part of their studies in Domestic Arts
> >> (cooking, cleaning, interior decoration, and family values). So I
> >> would appreciate it if ALL of you would watch your language.
> >>
> >
> >Well, theres a case of colossal bad judgement. If you let your kids
> >participate in an open forum with adults, you should expect them to see
> >some language that adults use.
>
> So now I'm somehow responsible for my kids being exposed to a bunch of
> foul-mouthed barbarians? Way to blame the victim!
>
> It isn't my responsibility to impose manners on manner-less people.
> They should learn to behave like civilized members of society. And
> what that means in these chat rooms is "Watch your language."

These are NOT chat rooms, these are the Usenet news groups. If there were an
adult, or free-for-all venue in the streets, say a bar for instance, full of
adults using whatever language they saw fit, would you tell them all to
watch their mouths, or just keep your kids the hell out of there?!? There's
bad language and porn all the heck over Usenet, if you let your kids wander
around the groups, expect them to experience it. Surely it is FAR easier to
keep your kids away from the 'bad language' than try to get heaps of people
change their behaviour.



Shaun aRe

"Otto Bahn" > wrote in message
...
> "Shaun aRe" > wrote
>
> > > > >Oh, come on. Why would anyone do something like that?
> > > > >
> > > > >(I'm beginning to wonder who the truly clueless one is here.)
> > > >
> > > > And you, sir, are yet another troll.
> > >
> > > I'm not very good at this troll thing. We should just
> > > make a list so I can put them all in my kill folder.
> >
> > LMAO! Yeah, you'd think that would work eh? ',;~}~
>
> I put myself in there 'cause there's no point in reading
> my own posts.

There's better reasons. Want me to explain more simple stuff you already
know to you? I love a good condescension session - it's good for the soul (I
have three to keep working).


',;~}~


Ever find yourself thinking that the word absurd is bizarre?

Shaun aRe
--
Whenever I talk in circles, all the squares go elsewhere.

"Chris McGonnell" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:07:26 -0400, Otto Bahn wrote:
>
> >"AlleyGator" > wrote
> >
> >> >Oh, come on. Why would anyone do something like that?
> >> >
> >> >(I'm beginning to wonder who the truly clueless one is here.)
> >>
> >> And you, sir, are yet another troll.
> >
> >I'm not very good at this troll thing. We should just
> >make a list so I can put them all in my kill folder.
>
> So trolls are bad, then? Is it because they "hook" you with a phony
> claim or a fictitious mistake and then make fun of you for correcting
> the errors? If that passes for humor with them, they're to be pitied.
> Now, how do you spot them and let them know that they haven't fooled
> you?

You ask a silly question, rinse and repeat until all your apples go pear
shaped and the lemons squeeze themselves. Not all fruits fit into a fruit
basket you know, and some women are juicier.

Or you play dumb - some people can't though because they are.

The fool and the wise man are but flip-sides of the same coin, so what's the
samefrence anyhoo?

BTW (P.s.) etc, coins; are you a flipper, or a tosser?

Have fun with uhhmm, whatever is fun stuff for you, and stuff. I'm off to
peel a sunbather.



Shaun aRe
--
Have at ye foul brigand! Ye, 'Sir', are naught but a cad and a bounder!
(Harrumph?)

"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:46:55 +0100, "Shaun aRe"
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >"AlleyGator" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> Kevin S. Wilson > wrote:
> >>
> >> >Oh, come on. Why would anyone do something like that?
> >> >
> >> >(I'm beginning to wonder who the truly clueless one is here.)
> >>
> >> And you, sir, are yet another troll.
> >
> >Bingo AG ',;~}~
> >
> >
> <crocodile dundee>
> That's not a troll! THIS is a troll!
> </crocodile dundee>

Hey Kevin it's like OK and shit you are like SUCH a famous troll and stuff I
am not smart or anything I didn't figure it out I just like recognised your
name, and stuff, like, m'K?

> >> Once again, what is a "troll?" I thought it was a noun and you're
> >> using it as a verb. You obviously don't mean fairy tale trolls.
> >
> >If you Google Usenet Troll or similar, should turn up a full explanation,
> >but basically, it is the name given to a poster who posts solely for the
> >purpose of stirring people up, causing trouble, getting as much
attention/as
> >many replies as possible, negative or positive, or just taking people in
> >hook line and sinker with made up bullshit. You have been 'trolled' when
> >you've fallen for any of it.
> >
> >Hope that helps!
>
> That certainly does help! It was a slow morning until I saw your
> earnest explanation of trollerization.

Oh that wasn't Ernest it was Eric.

> THANKS.

De nada DoOoD.

Don't mention it.

No, really, STFU.

> HAND.

Every time.

> WTF

I take it you have no kids then?



Shaun aRe
--
Living Life Large Like Loud Lemon Lipped Laughter.

"Shaun aRe" > wrote

> > > > I'm not very good at this troll thing. We should just
> > > > make a list so I can put them all in my kill folder.
> > >
> > > LMAO! Yeah, you'd think that would work eh? ',;~}~
> >
> > I put myself in there 'cause there's no point in reading
> > my own posts.
>
> There's better reasons. Want me to explain more simple stuff you already
> know to you? I love a good condescension session - it's good for the soul (I
> have three to keep working).

Whatever you want. It's pretty amusing watching you foam
at the mouth while six hooks from yesterday are dangling
out of your butt.

--oTTo--

Look before you swallow

on 2005-06-22 at 14:39 > wrote:

>You are indeed are really quite mad. If you weren't, you'd
>realise it.

needs more AAAARRRRRRRR!1!!11!!!

--
shelly
http://www.cat-sidh.net
http://cat-sidh.blogspot.com/
http://letters-to-esther.blogspot.com/ (updated 4/3/05)

on 2005-06-22 at 15:36 > wrote:

>> WTF
>
>I take it you have no kids then?

what's wrong with waving to friends?

--
shelly
http://www.cat-sidh.net
http://cat-sidh.blogspot.com/
http://letters-to-esther.blogspot.com/ (updated 4/3/05)

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:22:52 +0100, "Shaun aRe"
> wrote:

>
>"Otto Bahn" > wrote in message
...
>> "Shaun aRe" > wrote
>>
>> > > > >Oh, come on. Why would anyone do something like that?
>> > > > >
>> > > > >(I'm beginning to wonder who the truly clueless one is here.)
>> > > >
>> > > > And you, sir, are yet another troll.
>> > >
>> > > I'm not very good at this troll thing. We should just
>> > > make a list so I can put them all in my kill folder.
>> >
>> > LMAO! Yeah, you'd think that would work eh? ',;~}~
>>
>> I put myself in there 'cause there's no point in reading
>> my own posts.
>
>There's better reasons. Want me to explain more simple stuff you already
>know to you?

If he does, he'll simply make you explain simple stuff he already
knows. He's been making you do so for the better part of two days now.

And, yes, YHBT. YHL. HAND.

BTW, oTTo, it isn't often that they come out of the water to bait the
hook for you.

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:36:52 +0100, "Shaun aRe"
> wrote:

>
>"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:46:55 +0100, "Shaun aRe"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"AlleyGator" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >> Kevin S. Wilson > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Oh, come on. Why would anyone do something like that?
>> >> >
>> >> >(I'm beginning to wonder who the truly clueless one is here.)
>> >>
>> >> And you, sir, are yet another troll.
>> >
>> >Bingo AG ',;~}~
>> >
>> >
>> <crocodile dundee>
>> That's not a troll! THIS is a troll!
>> </crocodile dundee>
>
>Hey Kevin it's like OK and shit you are like SUCH a famous troll and stuff I
>am not smart or anything I didn't figure it out I just like recognised your
>name, and stuff, like, m'K?
>
>> >> Once again, what is a "troll?" I thought it was a noun and you're
>> >> using it as a verb. You obviously don't mean fairy tale trolls.
>> >
>> >If you Google Usenet Troll or similar, should turn up a full explanation,
>> >but basically, it is the name given to a poster who posts solely for the
>> >purpose of stirring people up, causing trouble, getting as much
>attention/as
>> >many replies as possible, negative or positive, or just taking people in
>> >hook line and sinker with made up bullshit. You have been 'trolled' when
>> >you've fallen for any of it.
>> >
>> >Hope that helps!
>>
>> That certainly does help! It was a slow morning until I saw your
>> earnest explanation of trollerization.
>
>Oh that wasn't Ernest it was Eric.
>
>> THANKS.
>
>De nada DoOoD.
>
>Don't mention it.
>
>No, really, STFU.
>
>> HAND.
>
>Every time.
>
>> WTF
>
>I take it you have no kids then?
>
You used all those words just to say "I meant to do that"?

Otto Bahn wrote:
> Shaun aRe wrote:
>
>>>>> I'm not very good at this troll thing. We should just make a
>>>>> list so I can put them all in my kill folder.
>>>>
>>>> LMAO! Yeah, you'd think that would work eh? ',;~}~
>>>
>>> I put myself in there 'cause there's no point in reading my own
>>> posts.
>>
>> There's better reasons. Want me to explain more simple stuff you
>> already know to you? I love a good condescension session - it's good
>> for the soul (I have three to keep working).
>
> Whatever you want. It's pretty amusing watching you foam
> at the mouth while six hooks from yesterday are dangling
> out of your butt.
>
> --oTTo--
>
> Look before you swallow

I don't get it. The purpose of being here is to post, to respond to other
people who post and be entertained. Why do you think you have done
something special in getting someone to reply to you when they came here
for the very purpose of replying to people?
You and everyone else here have done exactly these things.

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:22:52 +0100, "Shaun aRe"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> "Otto Bahn" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "Shaun aRe" > wrote
>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, come on. Why would anyone do something like that?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (I'm beginning to wonder who the truly clueless one is here.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And you, sir, are yet another troll.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not very good at this troll thing. We should just make a
>>>>> list so I can put them all in my kill folder.
>>>>
>>>> LMAO! Yeah, you'd think that would work eh? ',;~}~
>>>
>>> I put myself in there 'cause there's no point in reading my own
>>> posts.
>>
>> There's better reasons. Want me to explain more simple stuff you
>> already know to you?
>
> If he does, he'll simply make you explain simple stuff he already
> knows. He's been making you do so for the better part of two days
> now.
>
> And, yes, YHBT. YHL. HAND.
>
> BTW, oTTo, it isn't often that they come out of the water to bait the
> hook for you.
>

Yes, you were very believable at playing dumb.
Gratz!

"Nick" > wrote

> > Look before you swallow
>
> I don't get it. The purpose of being here is to post, to respond to other
> people who post and be entertained.

The purpose of life is to amuse me, which it does,
even if you're attempting a reverse meta-troll.

--oTTo--

Otto Bahn wrote:
> Nick wrote:
>
>>> Look before you swallow
>>
>> I don't get it. The purpose of being here is to post, to respond to
>> other people who post and be entertained.
>
> The purpose of life is to amuse me, which it does,
> even if you're attempting a reverse meta-troll.

I'll kindly thank you to watch the language. Children may be present.

"Nick" > wrote

> >>> Look before you swallow
> >>
> >> I don't get it. The purpose of being here is to post, to respond to
> >> other people who post and be entertained.
> >
> > The purpose of life is to amuse me, which it does,
> > even if you're attempting a reverse meta-troll.
>
> I'll kindly thank you to watch the language.

You're welcome -- it's rather hard to miss the language.
This is a text-based medium after all.

> Children may be present.

Yes, some children are gifted.

--oTTo--

And some are stolen

Dan Krueger > wrote in news:MA2ue.7712$jX6.808
@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:

> No, YOU'RE thinking of pastries, big boy...

Man, there sure have been a lot of rude people posting to these chat rooms
lately. Didn't you're mother's teach you any manners?

Besides, isn't RFB the place your supposed to be talking about the virtues
of pastries and other good yummies?

--
"...The job is to seek mystery, evoke mystery, plant a garden in which
strange plants grow and mysteries bloom. The need for mystery is greater
than the need for an answer." - Ken Kesey

"Shaun aRe" > wrote in
eenews.net:

> I have heard she's a good lucking woman who likes to lay on the faux
> sexiness somewhat, but I have yet to see what she looks like (I don't
> care).

I occasionally get entertained by the hostile reviews of her show on the
Food Network chat group. The other day, however, I am ashamed to admit, my
wife and I watched a bit of one of her shows, and my wife actually said
"that sounds pretty good!". It's a good thing she didn't write down the
recipe or anything, as it sounded very unappealing to me.

--
"...The job is to seek mystery, evoke mystery, plant a garden in which
strange plants grow and mysteries bloom. The need for mystery is greater
than the need for an answer." - Ken Kesey

shelly wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:34:22 GMT,
> (AlleyGator) wrote:
>
>
>>At least one or two of the links were vegetarian, I think.
>
>
> i'll look. thanks!
>
>
>>That's clever - vegetarian black-eyed peas.
>
>
> i live in the land of meat, where most people cook black-eyed peas with
> sausage. ugh. and, you'd be surprised at what passes for vegetarian.
> i can't count the number of times i've been told "it's veggie" when "it"
> *clearly* has chicken and/or chicken broth in it.
>

Pizza was served at a recent working lunch with a visiting Indian
engineer. There was a vegetarian pizza available, but the Indian
engineer declared that the chicken on the BBQ chicken pizza was not meat.

Go fibure.

--
Matthew

I'm a contractor. If you want an opinion, I'll sell you one.
Which one do you want?

Matthew L. Martin wrote:

> Pizza was served at a recent working lunch with a visiting Indian
> engineer. There was a vegetarian pizza available, but the Indian
> engineer declared that the chicken on the BBQ chicken pizza was not meat.
>
>
Every year the orthodox owners of the furniture factory where I worked
after I got out of college took the office staff to a local restaurant
for Christmas dinner.

Every year the wife of the owner ordered lobster.

I'm not sure what the deal was. Part of me thinks it was a feeling of,
"nothing I eat here is kosher, so I might as well go all the way",
another part wonders if you celebrate a Christian holiday with a bunch
of unbelievers if suddenly lobster is kosher.

All of us have our little inconsistencies.

The restaurant's bread was very good..... at least it fit the usual
definition of good restaurant bread. It was freshly heated on premises....

Mike

"Otto Bahn" > wrote in
:

> "Nick" > wrote
>
>> >>> Look before you swallow
>> >>
>> >> I don't get it. The purpose of being here is to post,
>> >> to respond to other people who post and be entertained.
>> >
>> > The purpose of life is to amuse me, which it does,
>> > even if you're attempting a reverse meta-troll.
>>
>> I'll kindly thank you to watch the language.
>
> You're welcome -- it's rather hard to miss the language.
> This is a text-based medium after all.
>
>> Children may be present.
>
> Yes, some children are gifted.
>
> --oTTo--
>
> And some are regifted
>
>

ifypfy

--
TeaLady (mari)

Sunshine is not conducive to the efficient work environment.
Therefore all access to the outdoors shall be limited to those
persons who perform non-productive tasks, and managers.

Mike Avery wrote:
> Matthew L. Martin wrote:
>
>> Pizza was served at a recent working lunch with a visiting Indian
>> engineer. There was a vegetarian pizza available, but the Indian
>> engineer declared that the chicken on the BBQ chicken pizza was not meat.
>>
>>
> Every year the orthodox owners of the furniture factory where I worked
> after I got out of college took the office staff to a local restaurant
> for Christmas dinner.
>
> Every year the wife of the owner ordered lobster.
>
> I'm not sure what the deal was. Part of me thinks it was a feeling of,
> "nothing I eat here is kosher, so I might as well go all the way",
> another part wonders if you celebrate a Christian holiday with a bunch
> of unbelievers if suddenly lobster is kosher.

It's related to the reason some orthodox Jews have three sets of plates
(and/or refrigerators): One for meat, one for dairy, and one for Chinese
takeout...

Dave

"shelly" > wrote in message
arble.net...
> on 2005-06-22 at 14:39 > wrote:
>
> >You are indeed are really quite mad. If you weren't, you'd
> >realise it.
>
> needs more AAAARRRRRRRR!1!!11!!!

Of course it does. Everything needs more aRe. Just a pity aRe is so
expensive these days. Now pay up.




Shaun aRe
--
Sometimes, the true and living thought bubbling rapidly up from the
depths of the mind, surfaces with a severe case of the Bends.

"shelly" > wrote in message
arble.net...
> on 2005-06-22 at 15:36 > wrote:
>
> >> WTF
> >
> >I take it you have no kids then?
>
> what's wrong with waving to friends?

I guess it would depend on the wave, and the friend, but, I'm not about to
just *guess* - I may be foolish but I'm no fool young lad.



Shaun aRe

"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message
news
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:36:52 +0100, "Shaun aRe"
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message
> .. .
> >> On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:46:55 +0100, "Shaun aRe"
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >"AlleyGator" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >> Kevin S. Wilson > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Oh, come on. Why would anyone do something like that?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >(I'm beginning to wonder who the truly clueless one is here.)
> >> >>
> >> >> And you, sir, are yet another troll.
> >> >
> >> >Bingo AG ',;~}~
> >> >
> >> >
> >> <crocodile dundee>
> >> That's not a troll! THIS is a troll!
> >> </crocodile dundee>
> >
> >Hey Kevin it's like OK and shit you are like SUCH a famous troll and
stuff I
> >am not smart or anything I didn't figure it out I just like recognised
your
> >name, and stuff, like, m'K?
> >
> >> >> Once again, what is a "troll?" I thought it was a noun and you're
> >> >> using it as a verb. You obviously don't mean fairy tale trolls.
> >> >
> >> >If you Google Usenet Troll or similar, should turn up a full
explanation,
> >> >but basically, it is the name given to a poster who posts solely for
the
> >> >purpose of stirring people up, causing trouble, getting as much
> >attention/as
> >> >many replies as possible, negative or positive, or just taking people
in
> >> >hook line and sinker with made up bullshit. You have been 'trolled'
when
> >> >you've fallen for any of it.
> >> >
> >> >Hope that helps!
> >>
> >> That certainly does help! It was a slow morning until I saw your
> >> earnest explanation of trollerization.
> >
> >Oh that wasn't Ernest it was Eric.
> >
> >> THANKS.
> >
> >De nada DoOoD.
> >
> >Don't mention it.
> >
> >No, really, STFU.
> >
> >> HAND.
> >
> >Every time.
> >
> >> WTF
> >
> >I take it you have no kids then?
> >
> You used all those words just to say "I meant to do that"?

I had them left over from some editing I did and they needing using up since
the freezer broke.

Besides, you seemed like a really decent bloke and well, I just fancied a
bit of a chat.

See ya! Be good! Have fun and stuff!


Shaun aRe
--
"Unfortunately; when
your young and full of ***, you are not educated enough in the fine art of
LSD taking." - liteage1

"Otto Bahn" > wrote in message
...
> "Shaun aRe" > wrote
>
> > > > > I'm not very good at this troll thing. We should just
> > > > > make a list so I can put them all in my kill folder.
> > > >
> > > > LMAO! Yeah, you'd think that would work eh? ',;~}~
> > >
> > > I put myself in there 'cause there's no point in reading
> > > my own posts.
> >
> > There's better reasons. Want me to explain more simple stuff you already
> > know to you? I love a good condescension session - it's good for the
soul (I
> > have three to keep working).
>
> Whatever you want. It's pretty amusing watching you foam
> at the mouth while six hooks from yesterday are dangling
> out of your butt.

Oh, I've met you all before.

Just let me know if you want those hooks back and I'll fish them out of my
tackle box. Ha ha! - Do you get it? I said 'fish the out' about the fish
hooks - damn I'm hilarious! ',;~}~

Have a great day now y'hear? I know I will because I always do because I'm
lovely.


Shaun aRe
--
May all your wishes be both wise and fulfilled.

"Nick" > wrote in message
...
> Otto Bahn wrote:
> > Shaun aRe wrote:
> >
> >>>>> I'm not very good at this troll thing. We should just make a
> >>>>> list so I can put them all in my kill folder.
> >>>>
> >>>> LMAO! Yeah, you'd think that would work eh? ',;~}~
> >>>
> >>> I put myself in there 'cause there's no point in reading my own
> >>> posts.
> >>
> >> There's better reasons. Want me to explain more simple stuff you
> >> already know to you? I love a good condescension session - it's good
> >> for the soul (I have three to keep working).
> >
> > Whatever you want. It's pretty amusing watching you foam
> > at the mouth while six hooks from yesterday are dangling
> > out of your butt.
> >
> > --oTTo--
> >
> > Look before you swallow
>
> I don't get it. The purpose of being here is to post, to respond to other
> people who post and be entertained. Why do you think you have done
> something special in getting someone to reply to you when they came here
> for the very purpose of replying to people?
> You and everyone else here have done exactly these things.

Oh, don't pick on the nice man Nick, it's not his fault!

Play nice now ',;~}~


Shaun aRe - And remember:
--
Life is the dream you wake up to.

"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:22:52 +0100, "Shaun aRe"
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >"Otto Bahn" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> "Shaun aRe" > wrote
> >>
> >> > > > >Oh, come on. Why would anyone do something like that?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >(I'm beginning to wonder who the truly clueless one is here.)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > And you, sir, are yet another troll.
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm not very good at this troll thing. We should just
> >> > > make a list so I can put them all in my kill folder.
> >> >
> >> > LMAO! Yeah, you'd think that would work eh? ',;~}~
> >>
> >> I put myself in there 'cause there's no point in reading
> >> my own posts.
> >
> >There's better reasons. Want me to explain more simple stuff you already
> >know to you?
>
> If he does, he'll simply make you explain simple stuff he already
> knows. He's been making you do so for the better part of two days now.
>
> And, yes, YHBT. YHL. HAND.

Oooo lovely! I like when (whatever you said) happens ',;~}~

> BTW, oTTo, it isn't often that they come out of the water to bait the
> hook for you.

Hey, I'm nothing if not terribly helpful. My mum told me that.

See ya!

Shaun aRe
--
Living Life Large Like Loud Lemon Lipped Laughter.

"Nick" > wrote in message
...
> Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:22:52 +0100, "Shaun aRe"
> > > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "Otto Bahn" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >>> "Shaun aRe" > wrote
> >>>
> >>>>>>> Oh, come on. Why would anyone do something like that?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> (I'm beginning to wonder who the truly clueless one is here.)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And you, sir, are yet another troll.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm not very good at this troll thing. We should just make a
> >>>>> list so I can put them all in my kill folder.
> >>>>
> >>>> LMAO! Yeah, you'd think that would work eh? ',;~}~
> >>>
> >>> I put myself in there 'cause there's no point in reading my own
> >>> posts.
> >>
> >> There's better reasons. Want me to explain more simple stuff you
> >> already know to you?
> >
> > If he does, he'll simply make you explain simple stuff he already
> > knows. He's been making you do so for the better part of two days
> > now.
> >
> > And, yes, YHBT. YHL. HAND.
> >
> > BTW, oTTo, it isn't often that they come out of the water to bait the
> > hook for you.
> >
>
> Yes, you were very believable at playing dumb.
> Gratz!

Kevin must have gone to RADA!

No wonder he's famous.

',;~}~

Shaun aRe
--
Sometimes, the true and living thought bubbling rapidly up from the
depths of the mind, surfaces with a severe case of the Bends.

on 2005-06-23 at 10:10 > wrote:

>Of course it does. Everything needs more aRe. Just a pity aRe
>is so expensive these days. Now pay up.

no, thanks. i checked and we're all full up with aRe.

--
shelly (accept no substitutions!)
http://www.cat-sidh.net
http://cat-sidh.blogspot.com/
http://letters-to-esther.blogspot.com/ (updated 4/3/05)