Ron wrote:
> In article . com>,
> "Jay Santos" > wrote:
>
> > dribbling homo wrote:
> > > In article
.com>,
> > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > As usual, no substance. The pattern is clear. Whenever you
are proved
> > > > wrong, your ego won't let you do either of the two correct
responses -
> > > > admit your error, or say nothing. Instead, you are driven to
make a
> > > > substance-free snarky response.
> > >
> > > Which vegan killed what animal
> >
> > It doesn't matter.
>
> I think it does matter.

It doesn't, I don't even think you believe it does; you're just taking
a shit.

> Which vegan killed what animal?

It doesn't matter.

>
> > > > The fact remains that your belief about what is "consistent"
with
> > the
> > > > thinking of a child is wrong, and a stupid thing for anyone to
> > believe.
> > >
> > > Where is that substantive argument that you keep insisting I
never make
> >
> > Reread that. What a moron you are. If you never make it, it
doesn't
> > exist, so I can't know where "it" is, because "it isn't".
>
> More of that dishonest editing.
No, no editing at all. You wrote an absurd piece of nonsense.