Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com>,
"Jay Santos" > wrote: > Ron wrote: > > In article .com>, > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote: > > > > > Ron wrote: > > > > > > > > As a fudgepacker, all you know about children is how to > bugger the > > > > > boys. Children think they're reponsible for NOTHING, you > ignorant > > > fat ****. > > > > > > > > Fat? > > > > > > Fat ****. > > > > What is my weight, > > No one cares, fat ****. > > > > > > As usual, no substance. The pattern is clear. Whenever you are > proved > > > wrong, your ego won't let you do either of the two correct > responses - > > > admit your error, or say nothing. Instead, you are driven to make > a > > > substance-free snarky response. > > > > Which vegan killed what animal > > It doesn't matter. I think it does matter. Which vegan killed what animal? > > > The fact remains that your belief about what is "consistent" with > the > > > thinking of a child is wrong, and a stupid thing for anyone to > believe. > > > > Where is that substantive argument that you keep insisting I never > make > > Reread that. What a moron you are. If you never make it, it doesn't > exist, so I can't know where "it" is, because "it isn't". More of that dishonest editing. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron wrote:
> In article . com>, > "Jay Santos" > wrote: > > > dribbling homo wrote: > > > In article .com>, > > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > As usual, no substance. The pattern is clear. Whenever you are proved > > > > wrong, your ego won't let you do either of the two correct responses - > > > > admit your error, or say nothing. Instead, you are driven to make a > > > > substance-free snarky response. > > > > > > Which vegan killed what animal > > > > It doesn't matter. > > I think it does matter. It doesn't, I don't even think you believe it does; you're just taking a shit. > Which vegan killed what animal? It doesn't matter. > > > > > The fact remains that your belief about what is "consistent" with > > the > > > > thinking of a child is wrong, and a stupid thing for anyone to > > believe. > > > > > > Where is that substantive argument that you keep insisting I never make > > > > Reread that. What a moron you are. If you never make it, it doesn't > > exist, so I can't know where "it" is, because "it isn't". > > More of that dishonest editing. No, no editing at all. You wrote an absurd piece of nonsense. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com>,
"Jay Santos" > wrote: > Ron wrote: > > In article . com>, > > "Jay Santos" > wrote: > > > > > dribbling homo wrote: > > > > In article > .com>, > > > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As usual, no substance. The pattern is clear. Whenever you > are proved > > > > > wrong, your ego won't let you do either of the two correct > responses - > > > > > admit your error, or say nothing. Instead, you are driven to > make a > > > > > substance-free snarky response. > > > > > > > > Which vegan killed what animal > > > > > > It doesn't matter. > > > > I think it does matter. > > It doesn't, I don't even think you believe it does; you're just taking > a shit. > > > Which vegan killed what animal? > > It doesn't matter. I notice your objection to responding to a simple question. How the great minds of the world seem so less than great at this moment. > > > > > The fact remains that your belief about what is "consistent" > with > > > the > > > > > thinking of a child is wrong, and a stupid thing for anyone to > > > believe. > > > > > > > > Where is that substantive argument that you keep insisting I > never make > > > > > > Reread that. What a moron you are. If you never make it, it > doesn't > > > exist, so I can't know where "it" is, because "it isn't". > > > > More of that dishonest editing. > No, no editing at all. You wrote an absurd piece of nonsense. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron wrote:
> In article .com>, > "Jay Santos" > wrote: > > > anal leakage wrote: > > > In article . com>, > > > "Jay Santos" > wrote: > > > > > > > dribbling homo wrote: > > > > > In article > > .com>, > > > > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As usual, no substance. The pattern is clear. Whenever you > > are proved > > > > > > wrong, your ego won't let you do either of the two correct > > responses - > > > > > > admit your error, or say nothing. Instead, you are driven to > > make a > > > > > > substance-free snarky response. > > > > > > > > > > Which vegan killed what animal > > > > > > > > It doesn't matter. > > > > > > I think it does matter. > > > > It doesn't, I don't even think you believe it does; you're just taking > > a shit. > > > > > Which vegan killed what animal? > > > > It doesn't matter. > > I notice your objection to You notice my refusal to let you waste my time on your terms. I may waste some time on you, but it will always be on my terms, you impotent self-loathing little homo. How's your HIV doing? > > > > > > > The fact remains that your belief about what is "consistent" > > with > > > > the > > > > > > thinking of a child is wrong, and a stupid thing for anyone to > > > > believe. > > > > > > > > > > Where is that substantive argument that you keep insisting I > > never make > > > > > > > > Reread that. What a moron you are. If you never make it, it > > doesn't > > > > exist, so I can't know where "it" is, because "it isn't". > > > > > > More of that dishonest editing. > > No, no editing at all. You wrote an absurd piece of nonsense. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() In article .com>, "Jay Santos" > wrote: > Ron wrote: > > In article .com>, > > "Jay Santos" > wrote: > > > > > anal leakage wrote: > > > > In article > . com>, > > > > "Jay Santos" > wrote: > > > > > > > > > dribbling homo wrote: > > > > > > In article > > > .com>, > > > > > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As usual, no substance. The pattern is clear. Whenever > you > > > are proved > > > > > > > wrong, your ego won't let you do either of the two correct > > > responses - > > > > > > > admit your error, or say nothing. Instead, you are driven > to > > > make a > > > > > > > substance-free snarky response. > > > > > > > > > > > > Which vegan killed what animal > > > > > > > > > > It doesn't matter. > > > > > > > > I think it does matter. > > > > > > It doesn't, I don't even think you believe it does; you're just > taking > > > a shit. > > > > > > > Which vegan killed what animal? > > > > > > It doesn't matter. > > > > I notice your objection to > > You notice my refusal to let you waste my time on your terms. I may > waste some time on you, but it will always be on my terms, you impotent > self-loathing little homo. > > How's your HIV doing? roflmao Such a simple question. So much for the club of the great minds. What vegan killed what animal? What animal did I kill when I purchased my tomatoes this past week? Ah, the disappointment, but i"ll manage. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron wrote:
> In article .com>, > "Jay Santos" > wrote: > > > anal leakage wrote: > > > In article .com>, > > > "Jay Santos" > wrote: > > > > > > > anal leakage wrote: > > > > > In article > > . com>, > > > > > "Jay Santos" > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > dribbling homo wrote: > > > > > > > In article > > > > .com>, > > > > > > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As usual, no substance. > > > > > Which vegan killed what animal? > > > > > > > > It doesn't matter. > > > > > > I notice your objection to > > > > You notice my refusal to let you waste my time on your terms. I may > > waste some time on you, but it will always be on my terms, you impotent > > self-loathing little homo. > > > > How's your HIV doing? > > roflmao You laugh at the fact you have the HIV? > > Such a simple question. Simple-minded, homo. It's a simple-minded, it's not serious, it's a waste of time. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com>,
"Rudy Canoza" > wrote: > Ron wrote: > > In article .com>, > > "Jay Santos" > wrote: > > > > > anal leakage wrote: > > > > In article > .com>, > > > > "Jay Santos" > wrote: > > > > > > > > > anal leakage wrote: > > > > > > In article > > > . com>, > > > > > > "Jay Santos" > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > dribbling homo wrote: > > > > > > > > In article > > > > > .com>, > > > > > > > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As usual, no substance. > > > > > > Which vegan killed what animal? > > > > > > > > > > It doesn't matter. > > > > > > > > I notice your objection to > > > > > > You notice my refusal to let you waste my time on your terms. I > may > > > waste some time on you, but it will always be on my terms, you > impotent > > > self-loathing little homo. > > > > > > How's your HIV doing? > > > > roflmao > > You laugh at the fact you have the HIV? I laugh at the diversion and the intellectual dishonesty. > > Such a simple question. > > Simple-minded, homo. It's a simple-minded, it's not serious, it's a > waste of time. Which vegan killed what animal? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The perfect G&T.... | General Cooking | |||
The perfect cup of tea | Tea | |||
Perfect BBQ was had | Barbecue | |||
The perfect cup of tea | Tea | |||
The perfect foil (and her moral confusion) | Vegan |