On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 23:40:40 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>Reynard wrote:
>> On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:12:28 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>>>Reynard wrote:
>>>>On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:47:57 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>>>>>Reynard wrote:
>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:01:12 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>>>>>>>Reynard wrote:
>>>>>>>>On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:56:53 -0500, "Scented Nectar" > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>Reynard wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 19:25:27 -0500, "Scented Nectar" > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Why a month ago, what's different now? I gave up
>>>>>>>>>>>meat in 1981. Recently I've begun eliminating the
>>>>>>>>>>>last of the dairy in my meals, so if it's that you're
>>>>>>>>>>>talking about, I haven't kept records and can't
>>>>>>>>>>>therefore answer you.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>It's a bit like making a new year's resolution to stop
>>>>>>>>>>dropping litter. Even though you had no idea of the
>>>>>>>>>>amount of litter you were dropping in 2004, holding
>>>>>>>>>>on to your litter and disposing of it properly in 2005
>>>>>>>>>>will mean you have reduced your littering, however
>>>>>>>>>>much littering you did prior to 2005. You don't need
>>>>>>>>>>numbers to know you're reducing your litter, and the
>>>>>>>>>>same goes for collateral deaths, so don't let the likes
>>>>>>>>>>of 'usual suspect' tell you any different while he tries
>>>>>>>>>>to belittle and dismiss your efforts.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I see through him.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>We all do. Since turning his back on veganism he's
>>>>>>>>become a meat pusher like all the other meat pushers
>>>>>>>>we get here on this forum.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I've recommended that people consume products which
>>>>>>
>>>>>>... they don't want,
>>>>>
>>>>>They don't want to actually do what they say they're doing
>>>>
>>>>They are
>>>
>>>not
>>
Can't you go through a single thread without having to edit your
opponent's replies, pusher?

They are doing exactly what they say they're doing: abstaining
from meat, so stop pushing it onto them, pusher.

>> you attack them and belittle their efforts at staying 'clean.'
>
>They're not clean, they're hypocrites.

Spoken like the true user you are, trying to push your substances
onto clean targets by calling them hypocrites.

It's a perfect analogy, pusher.

An analogy is written in the form.
A is like B.
B has property P.
Therefore, A has property P.

(A) A pusher pushing meat
is like
(B) A pusher pushing drugs
(B) has the property (P), a dependency for his product
and a desire to push it onto others.

Therefore, (A) a pusher pushing meat has the property
(P), a dependency for his product and a desire to push it
onto others.

Shove off, pusher!