Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Historic (rec.food.historic) Discussing and discovering how food was made and prepared way back when--From ancient times down until (& possibly including or even going slightly beyond) the times when industrial revolution began to change our lives. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.historic
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, because it is dead here, and because I do like to post these
things for future reference, here is a little factoid from an old (1903) cookbook I was perusing: 12 sticks of macaroni = 1/4 lb Now, wouldn't folks here like to start posting, or I might be forced to type up a recipe or something. :-) Shoulda kept items with no hits on goo*le out for this purpose. -- Jean B. |
Posted to rec.food.historic
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sqwertz (great username, BTW),
I'm not sure I understand your question... there are many hollow straight pastas (ziti, rigatoni, and penne, are a few examples). As for "sticks" -- while most commercial ziti is "cut ziti," the original form is in sticks, about a foot long. I can usually get it in my local supermarket, and it's certainly available in Italian specialty shops. There's a classic timbale, made with uncut ziti coiled around the outside like a beehive. If most of my cookbooks weren't packed away in boxes in a very hot attic, I'd dig it out for you! Gary PS: The Encyclopedia of Pasta, by Oretta Zanini De Vita, will expose you to more kinds of pasta than you can possibly imagine... >Date: Tues, Jul 5 2011 11:07 pm >From: Sqwertz >On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 23:49:23 -0400, Jean B. wrote: >Why is Chefboyardee Beefaroni(tm) the only hollow tubular straight >macaroni available? I've never seen it dried, or in sticks. >Bucatini are too thick in the pasta and not enough airspace, IMO. Why >can't we (I?) get straight macaroni which is "hollower" than bucatini? >-sw |
Posted to rec.food.historic
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sqwertz wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 23:49:23 -0400, Jean B. wrote: > >> Well, because it is dead here, and because I do like to post these >> things for future reference, here is a little factoid from an old >> (1903) cookbook I was perusing: >> >> 12 sticks of macaroni = 1/4 lb >> >> Now, wouldn't folks here like to start posting, or I might be >> forced to type up a recipe or something. :-) Shoulda kept items >> with no hits on goo*le out for this purpose. > > So what gives macaroni it's curl in the first place? Is there some > sort of "drag" formed into the sides of one of the brass extruders? > Why is Chefboyardee Beefaroni(tm) the only hollow tubular straight > macaroni available? I've never seen it dried, or in sticks. > > Bucatini are too thick in the pasta and not enough airspace, IMO. Why > can't we (I?) get straight macaroni which is "hollower" than bucatini? > > -sw Ah, I am not an expert on pasta. But maybe someone here is. -- Jean B. |
Posted to rec.food.historic
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sqwertz wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 23:49:23 -0400, Jean B. wrote: > >> Well, because it is dead here, and because I do like to post these >> things for future reference, here is a little factoid from an old >> (1903) cookbook I was perusing: >> >> 12 sticks of macaroni = 1/4 lb >> >> Now, wouldn't folks here like to start posting, or I might be >> forced to type up a recipe or something. :-) Shoulda kept items >> with no hits on goo*le out for this purpose. > > So what gives macaroni it's curl in the first place? Is there some > sort of "drag" formed into the sides of one of the brass extruders? > Why is Chefboyardee Beefaroni(tm) the only hollow tubular straight > macaroni available? I've never seen it dried, or in sticks. > > Bucatini are too thick in the pasta and not enough airspace, IMO. Why > can't we (I?) get straight macaroni which is "hollower" than bucatini? > > -sw PS Come to think of it, I would like to see period drawings or photos of what was offering here in days of yore. Usually I do read of breaking up the macaroni, so that must have been the norm. -- Jean B. |
Posted to rec.food.historic
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 01:07:02 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote: >On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 23:49:23 -0400, Jean B. wrote: > >> Well, because it is dead here, and because I do like to post these >> things for future reference, here is a little factoid from an old >> (1903) cookbook I was perusing: >> >> 12 sticks of macaroni = 1/4 lb >> >> Now, wouldn't folks here like to start posting, or I might be >> forced to type up a recipe or something. :-) Shoulda kept items >> with no hits on goo*le out for this purpose. > >So what gives macaroni it's curl in the first place? Is there some >sort of "drag" formed into the sides of one of the brass extruders? >Why is Chefboyardee Beefaroni(tm) the only hollow tubular straight >macaroni available? I've never seen it dried, or in sticks. > >Bucatini are too thick in the pasta and not enough airspace, IMO. Why >can't we (I?) get straight macaroni which is "hollower" than bucatini? Try Maestri Pastai (also sold as Gragnano), they offer a long ziti, mezzanini, mezze candele, penne candela, and candele lunghe. I am sure there are other Italian pasta manufacturers that offer these long, hollow pastas, but this was the first I was able to find. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
non stick pan | General Cooking | |||
Non Stick Wok or Not | Cooking Equipment | |||
Non Stick Wok or Not | Cooking Equipment | |||
Non stick pan | General Cooking | |||
Calphalon Pro non-stick ii vs commercial non-stick? | Cooking Equipment |