Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under four
pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a fork-tender cut? I know I could make pot roast with it, but that's not what I want. TIA -- Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬ ________________________________________ Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 9>,
Wayne Boatwright <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote: > I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under four > pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a fork-tender cut? I > know I could make pot roast with it, but that's not what I want. You're pulling our legs, right? What did you pay for this? -- Dan Abel Petaluma, California, USA |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu 26 Jan 2006 05:52:51p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Dan Abel?
> In article 9>, > Wayne Boatwright <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote: > >> I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under four >> pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a fork-tender >> cut? I know I could make pot roast with it, but that's not what I >> want. > > > You're pulling our legs, right? I didn't mean a way to cook it like prime rib. Just a good recipe for tender meat. Is that impossible? > What did you pay for this? $2.99/lb. -- Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬ ________________________________________ Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 9>,
Wayne Boatwright <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu 26 Jan 2006 05:52:51p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Dan Abel? > > > In article 9>, > > Wayne Boatwright <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under four > >> pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a fork-tender > >> cut? I know I could make pot roast with it, but that's not what I > >> want. > > > > > > You're pulling our legs, right? > > I didn't mean a way to cook it like prime rib. Just a good recipe for tender > meat. Is that impossible? Pretty much. This is a tough cut of meat. > > What did you pay for this? > > $2.99/lb. Sounds good to me. I think your choices are to pot roast (braise it) or have tough meat. -- Dan Abel Petaluma, California, USA |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Abel" > wrote in message >> >> I didn't mean a way to cook it like prime rib. Just a good recipe for >> tender >> meat. Is that impossible? > > > Pretty much. This is a tough cut of meat. Pot roast it. Very tender. Tender as prime rib, but a different flavor. There is no such thing as a tough cut of beef if cooked properly. Come over and try my brisket sometime. -- Ed http://pages.cthome.net/edhome/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu 26 Jan 2006 10:14:25p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Edwin
Pawlowski? > > "Dan Abel" > wrote in message >>> >>> I didn't mean a way to cook it like prime rib. Just a good recipe for >>> tender meat. Is that impossible? >> >> >> Pretty much. This is a tough cut of meat. > > Pot roast it. Very tender. Tender as prime rib, but a different flavor. > There is no such thing as a tough cut of beef if cooked properly. Come > over and try my brisket sometime. I agree. If it's tough, then either the method and/or timing is wrong. I always seem to get hung up on the term "pot roast", immediately associating it with a pot roast and potatoes, carrots, celery, onions, etc., while I really do know that pot roasting is a method. Probably the best one for the cut of meat I bought. Thanks! -- Wayne Boatwright o¿o ____________________ BIOYA |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
"Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote: > "Dan Abel" > wrote in message > >> > >> I didn't mean a way to cook it like prime rib. Just a good recipe for > >> tender > >> meat. Is that impossible? > > > > > > Pretty much. This is a tough cut of meat. > > Pot roast it. Very tender. Tender as prime rib, but a different flavor. > There is no such thing as a tough cut of beef if cooked properly. Come over > and try my brisket sometime. I've gotten nailed this way before, and I haven't learned. Things get taken out of context, and I forget that. In the original post, Wayne wanted fork tender meat, but he did *not* want to pot roast it. I assumed that meant he didn't want to cook it low and slow, with moist heat. Maybe I was assuming too much. In any case this is one tough piece of meat, definitely *not* fork tender, if you cook it with dry heat. -- Dan Abel Petaluma, California, USA |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu 26 Jan 2006 09:37:39p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Dan Abel?
> In article 9>, > Wayne Boatwright <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu 26 Jan 2006 05:52:51p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Dan >> Abel? >> >> > In article 9>, >> > Wayne Boatwright <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under >> >> four pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a >> >> fork-tender cut? I know I could make pot roast with it, but that's >> >> not what I want. >> > >> > >> > You're pulling our legs, right? >> >> I didn't mean a way to cook it like prime rib. Just a good recipe for >> tender meat. Is that impossible? > > > Pretty much. This is a tough cut of meat. > > >> > What did you pay for this? >> >> $2.99/lb. > > Sounds good to me. > > I think your choices are to pot roast (braise it) or have tough meat. > Thanks... I've been coming to that conclusion. -- Wayne Boatwright o¿o ____________________ BIOYA |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I love the flavor of the "tougher" cuts, but not always the "pot roast or stewed" meat taste. This is an old recipe but it works for me.......I also like beef rare. I have also used chuck steak and roasts on sale and cut them into 2" steaks.............I use the rib rack from the grill to hold the steaks upright. Hope you like. Lorin OVEN STEAK For tender steaks such as porterhouse, sirloin, or rib: stand a 2" steak on edge in a V-shaped rack in a roasting pan. Place in a 200 degree oven for 2 hours. Then place flat on a rack and broil or grill 3 to 5 minutes on each side, until well browned. Fro less-tender steaks such as chuck sirloin tip or top round: brush lightly with water on each side. Sprinkle with unseasoned meat tenderizer according to package directions. Bake as for tender steaks, allowing 45 minutes per pound of meat; broil the same way. "Wayne Boatwright" <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote in message 28.19... > On Thu 26 Jan 2006 09:37:39p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Dan Abel? > >> In article 9>, >> Wayne Boatwright <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thu 26 Jan 2006 05:52:51p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Dan >>> Abel? >>> >>> > In article 9>, >>> > Wayne Boatwright <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> >> I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under >>> >> four pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a >>> >> fork-tender cut? I know I could make pot roast with it, but that's >>> >> not what I want. >>> > >>> > >>> > You're pulling our legs, right? >>> >>> I didn't mean a way to cook it like prime rib. Just a good recipe for >>> tender meat. Is that impossible? >> >> >> Pretty much. This is a tough cut of meat. >> >> >>> > What did you pay for this? >>> >>> $2.99/lb. >> >> Sounds good to me. >> >> I think your choices are to pot roast (braise it) or have tough meat. >> > > Thanks... I've been coming to that conclusion. > > -- > Wayne Boatwright o¿o > ____________________ > > BIOYA |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Wayne Boatwright wrote: > I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under four > pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a fork-tender cut? I > know I could make pot roast with it, but that's not what I want. Then you bought the wrong cut of chuck, of all chuck cuts this is the least favorable to prepare any other way but braised. The only other cooking methods are to grind it for great burgers or trim away the fat/bone and cut into thin strips or small cubes, marinate, and stir fry. http://www.mealsforyou.com/cgi-bin/c...tcutsbeef.html |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 9>,
Wayne Boatwright <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote: > I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under four > pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a fork-tender cut? I > know I could make pot roast with it, but that's not what I want. I do these fairly often. They're one of the better beef roast buys around my part of the world (Sac. CA). Just season it and roast it at 325 to 350F. until it's where you like it on the rare-well continuum. They are not as tender as filet, but if you slice thin they are just fine. They are not fatty but still flavorful. D.M. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu 26 Jan 2006 06:38:47p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Donald
Martinich? > In article 9>, > Wayne Boatwright <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote: > >> I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under four >> pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a fork-tender >> cut? I know I could make pot roast with it, but that's not what I >> want. > > I do these fairly often. They're one of the better beef roast buys > around my part of the world (Sac. CA). Just season it and roast it at > 325 to 350F. until it's where you like it on the rare-well continuum. > They are not as tender as filet, but if you slice thin they are just > fine. They are not fatty but still flavorful. > > D.M. Thank you, Donald. -- Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬ ________________________________________ Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under four > pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a fork-tender cut? I > know I could make pot roast with it, but that's not what I want. > Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬ I'd never heard of this beef cut prior to this post but a brief search took me to the Cook's Thesaurus and this is what they have to say: "cross rib roast = cross rib pot roast = Boston cut = English cut roast = English roast = thick rib roast = bread and butter cut = beef chuck cross rib pot roast Notes: If boneless, this is sometimes called an English roll. This makes a fine pot roast, but it's too tough to roast with dry heat." It seems per Sheldon's recommendation that braising would be your best bet. Kev |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu 26 Jan 2006 06:47:15p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it kevnbro?
> Wayne Boatwright wrote: >> I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under four >> pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a fork-tender >> cut ? I know I could make pot roast with it, but that's not what I >> want. > >> Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬ > > I'd never heard of this beef cut prior to this post but a brief search > took me to the Cook's Thesaurus and this is what they have to say: > > "cross rib roast = cross rib pot roast = Boston cut = English cut roast > = English roast = thick rib roast = bread and butter cut = beef chuck > cross rib pot roast Notes: If boneless, this is sometimes called an > English roll. This makes a fine pot roast, but it's too tough to roast > with dry heat." > > It seems per Sheldon's recommendation that braising would be your best > bet. Kev > Yes, after a bit more googling, I'm inclined to agree. Slow, moist cooking seems to be the answer, so pot roasting or braising it will be. I think braising this time, as I didn't really want pot roast. Thanks! -- Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬ ________________________________________ Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Jan 2006 01:17:54 +0100, Wayne Boatwright
<wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote: >I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under four >pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a fork-tender cut? I >know I could make pot roast with it, but that's not what I want. > >TIA I have always prepared chuck roast by browning each side (stovetop or broiler.) Then I set the heat for about 250°F, cover the pot and cook until it is falling apart. Needs to be well done. -- Susan N. "Moral indignation is in most cases two percent moral, 48 percent indignation, and 50 percent envy." Vittorio De Sica, Italian movie director (1901-1974 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
The Cook > wrote: > On 27 Jan 2006 01:17:54 +0100, Wayne Boatwright > <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > >I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under four > >pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a fork-tender cut? > >I > >know I could make pot roast with it, but that's not what I want. > > > >TIA > > > I have always prepared chuck roast by browning each side (stovetop or > broiler.) Then I set the heat for about 250°F, cover the pot and > cook until it is falling apart. Needs to be well done. How long at 250, Susan? I usually do mine at 325 or 300 -- maybe 3-1/2 hours for a 3-4# slab. A couple sisters do them stovetop -- I've never had success on top of the stove. -- http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 1-15-2006, RIP Connie Drew |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> In article >, The Cook > > wrote: > > >> On 27 Jan 2006 01:17:54 +0100, Wayne Boatwright >> <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just >>> under four pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this >>> into a fork-tender cut? I know I could make pot roast with it, >>> but that's not what I want. >> >> >> I have always prepared chuck roast by browning each side (stovetop >> or broiler.) Then I set the heat for about 250°F, cover the pot >> and cook until it is falling apart. Needs to be well done. > > > How long at 250, Susan? I usually do mine at 325 or 300 -- maybe > 3-1/2 hours for a 3-4# slab. A couple sisters do them stovetop -- > I've never had success on top of the stove. The stovetop technique is to cook at a very low temperature with very little added liquid. Slice maybe three onions and scatter them around the bottom of the pot. Put the meat on top, salt, pepper, splash of oil, splash vinegar. Cover and turn heat to as low as your stove will go. In about two hours you'll have meat, very tasty pan liquid and onions reduced to a wonderfully meaty and onion-sweet near-puree. Whiz with a wand blender and thicken (reduce or starch it) if necessary. Serve meat as you would a pot roast, juices as gravy... Pastorio |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
"Bob (this one)" > wrote: (snippage) > > How long at 250, Susan? I usually do mine at 325 or 300 -- maybe > > 3-1/2 hours for a 3-4# slab. A couple sisters do them stovetop -- > > I've never had success on top of the stove. > > The stovetop technique is to cook at a very low temperature with very > little added liquid. Slice maybe three onions and scatter them around > the bottom of the pot. Put the meat on top, salt, pepper, splash of oil, > splash vinegar. Cover and turn heat to as low as your stove will go. In > about two hours you'll have meat, very tasty pan liquid and onions > reduced to a wonderfully meaty and onion-sweet near-puree. Whiz with a > wand blender and thicken (reduce or starch it) if necessary. > > Serve meat as you would a pot roast, juices as gravy... > > Pastorio You might. I don't. Mine on the stovetop suck. I can't get my stove temp low enough for a simmer. -- http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 1-15-2006, RIP Connie Drew |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 07:57:49 -0600, Melba's Jammin'
> wrote: >In article >, > The Cook > wrote: > >> On 27 Jan 2006 01:17:54 +0100, Wayne Boatwright >> <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under four >> >pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a fork-tender cut? >> >I >> >know I could make pot roast with it, but that's not what I want. >> > >> >TIA >> >> >> I have always prepared chuck roast by browning each side (stovetop or >> broiler.) Then I set the heat for about 250°F, cover the pot and >> cook until it is falling apart. Needs to be well done. > >How long at 250, Susan? I usually do mine at 325 or 300 -- maybe 3-1/2 >hours for a 3-4# slab. A couple sisters do them stovetop -- I've never >had success on top of the stove. I really do not know exactly. Whenever it falls apart. I guess about 3 hours for a 2 lb roast. A couple of times I browned it under the broiler, turned the oven off, put the top on and closed the door. The roast was cooked in about 4 hours. (I turned the oven off so I could put the lid on, etc. and forgot to set it for bake.) -- Susan N. "Moral indignation is in most cases two percent moral, 48 percent indignation, and 50 percent envy." Vittorio De Sica, Italian movie director (1901-1974 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri 27 Jan 2006 06:11:54a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it The Cook?
> On 27 Jan 2006 01:17:54 +0100, Wayne Boatwright > <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote: > >>I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under four >>pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a fork-tender >>cut? I know I could make pot roast with it, but that's not what I want. >> >>TIA > > > I have always prepared chuck roast by browning each side (stovetop or > broiler.) Then I set the heat for about 250°F, cover the pot and > cook until it is falling apart. Needs to be well done. That sounds like what I want to do, as I really want the meat relatively plain. About how long does it take at that temperature? Thanks! -- Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬ ________________________________________ Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 9>,
Wayne Boatwright <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote: > I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under four > pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a fork-tender cut? I > know I could make pot roast with it, but that's not what I want. > > TIA Cub's got those on sale for $2.58/lb this week, along with chuck blades and eye rounds. From the chuck it will need moist heat. You don't want pot roast, cut it in chunks and make stew. Pot roast in another form. :-) How about Beef Bourguignonne? Stewed beef with red wine. Cook the beef chunks and freeze in broth for later transformation into something like -- beef stew, beef in gravy over rice or noodles, fake stroganoff. (See a pattern here?) http://tinyurl.com/e4ahe EASY BEEF BOURGUIGNONNE (from Cooks.com) Approx. 3 lbs. beef (potting, stewing) 2 cans Golden mushroom soup 1 env. Lipton onion soup 1 c. burgundy wine 1 can mushrooms (or fresh mushrooms) Place all above ingredients, except mushrooms in large covered pot and bake at 300 degrees for about 3 hours. Fifteen minutes before finished, put in fresh mushrooms and, if you like, some baby carrots which have been partially cooked and which will complete cooking in the last 15 minutes. Serve over rice or noodles or with mashed potatoes. Approximately 6 to 8 servings. -- http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 1-15-2006, RIP Connie Drew |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Melba's Jammin'" > wrote > Wayne Boatwright <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote: > >> I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under four >> pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a fork-tender >> cut? I >> know I could make pot roast with it, but that's not what I want. > You don't want pot roast, cut it in chunks and make stew. Pot roast in > another form. :-) How about Beef Bourguignonne? Stewed beef with > red wine. Cook the beef chunks and freeze in broth for later > transformation into something like -- beef stew, beef in gravy over rice > or noodles, fake stroganoff. (See a pattern here?) I was thinking the same thing, though 4 pounds is a lot of stew cubes, perhaps just freeze half of it whole for that use, later. Also wasn't sure if Wayne doesn't want pot roast, would he want stew? Why would you cook the cubes before freezing, just curious? nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri 27 Jan 2006 06:55:41a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Melba's
Jammin'? > In article 9>, > Wayne Boatwright <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote: > >> I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under four >> pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a fork-tender >> cut? I know I could make pot roast with it, but that's not what I >> want. >> >> TIA > > Cub's got those on sale for $2.58/lb this week, along with chuck blades > and eye rounds. From the chuck it will need moist heat. > > You don't want pot roast, cut it in chunks and make stew. Pot roast in > another form. :-) How about Beef Bourguignonne? Stewed beef with > red wine. Cook the beef chunks and freeze in broth for later > transformation into something like -- beef stew, beef in gravy over rice > or noodles, fake stroganoff. (See a pattern here?) > > http://tinyurl.com/e4ahe > EASY BEEF BOURGUIGNONNE (from Cooks.com) > > Approx. 3 lbs. beef (potting, stewing) > 2 cans Golden mushroom soup > 1 env. Lipton onion soup > 1 c. burgundy wine > 1 can mushrooms (or fresh mushrooms) > > Place all above ingredients, except mushrooms in large covered pot and > bake at 300 degrees for about 3 hours. Fifteen minutes before finished, > put in fresh mushrooms and, if you like, some baby carrots which have > been partially cooked and which will complete cooking in the last 15 > minutes. Serve over rice or noodles or with mashed potatoes. > Approximately 6 to 8 servings. All great suggestions, Barb, and I've saved the recipe above for some future time. However, my goal right now is cooking this roast as plainly as possible. We are on Weight Watchers and I need to eliminate many additions I might ordinarily make to a good roast. I should probably have included that tidbit in my original post. Sorry...and thanks! -- Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬ ________________________________________ Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > EASY BEEF BOURGUIGNONNE (from Cooks.com) > > Approx. 3 lbs. beef (potting, stewing) > 2 cans Golden mushroom soup > 1 env. Lipton onion soup > 1 c. burgundy wine > 1 can mushrooms (or fresh mushrooms) > > Place all above ingredients, except mushrooms in large covered pot and > bake at 300 degrees for about 3 hours. Fifteen minutes before finished, > put in fresh mushrooms and, if you like, some baby carrots which have > been partially cooked and which will complete cooking in the last 15 > minutes. Serve over rice or noodles or with mashed potatoes. > Approximately 6 to 8 servings. > -- > http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 1-15-2006, RIP Connie Drew We don't care for the flavour of wine in our food, so would beef broth be an acceptable substitute? I know it won't be "bourguignonne" but should be tasty anyway? I've substituted chicken broth instead of white wine in dishes before and they turned out fine....tia...Sharon |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri 27 Jan 2006 11:51:51a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it biig?
> >> EASY BEEF BOURGUIGNONNE (from Cooks.com) >> >> Approx. 3 lbs. beef (potting, stewing) >> 2 cans Golden mushroom soup >> 1 env. Lipton onion soup >> 1 c. burgundy wine >> 1 can mushrooms (or fresh mushrooms) >> >> Place all above ingredients, except mushrooms in large covered pot and >> bake at 300 degrees for about 3 hours. Fifteen minutes before finished, >> put in fresh mushrooms and, if you like, some baby carrots which have >> been partially cooked and which will complete cooking in the last 15 >> minutes. Serve over rice or noodles or with mashed potatoes. >> Approximately 6 to 8 servings. >> -- >> http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 1-15-2006, RIP Connie Drew > > We don't care for the flavour of wine in our food, so would beef > broth be an acceptable substitute? I know it won't be "bourguignonne" > but should be tasty anyway? I've substituted chicken broth instead of > white wine in dishes before and they turned out fine....tia...Sharon > Sure, with broth it will still be tasty. -- Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬ ________________________________________ Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Wayne Boatwright wrote: > > On Fri 27 Jan 2006 11:51:51a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it biig? > > > > >> EASY BEEF BOURGUIGNONNE (from Cooks.com) > >> > >> Approx. 3 lbs. beef (potting, stewing) > >> 2 cans Golden mushroom soup > >> 1 env. Lipton onion soup > >> 1 c. burgundy wine > >> 1 can mushrooms (or fresh mushrooms) > >> > >> Place all above ingredients, except mushrooms in large covered pot and > >> bake at 300 degrees for about 3 hours. Fifteen minutes before finished, > >> put in fresh mushrooms and, if you like, some baby carrots which have > >> been partially cooked and which will complete cooking in the last 15 > >> minutes. Serve over rice or noodles or with mashed potatoes. > >> Approximately 6 to 8 servings. > >> -- > >> http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 1-15-2006, RIP Connie Drew > > > > We don't care for the flavour of wine in our food, so would beef > > broth be an acceptable substitute? I know it won't be "bourguignonne" > > but should be tasty anyway? I've substituted chicken broth instead of > > white wine in dishes before and they turned out fine....tia...Sharon > > > > Sure, with broth it will still be tasty. > > -- > Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬ > ________________________________________ > > Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you! Thanks Wayne |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, biig > wrote:
> > EASY BEEF BOURGUIGNONNE (from Cooks.com) > > > > Approx. 3 lbs. beef (potting, stewing) > > 2 cans Golden mushroom soup > > 1 env. Lipton onion soup > > 1 c. burgundy wine > > 1 can mushrooms (or fresh mushrooms) (snippage) > > We don't care for the flavour of wine in our food, so would beef > broth be an acceptable substitute? I know it won't be "bourguignonne" > but should be tasty anyway? I've substituted chicken broth instead of > white wine in dishes before and they turned out fine....tia...Sharon Actually, Sharon, I kind of posted it as a joke. Canned this, packaged that, -- and a glug of red wine. I think you could fake cooking the beef chunks any way you wanted to. -- http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 1-15-2006, RIP Connie Drew |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri 27 Jan 2006 04:26:42p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Melba's
Jammin'? > In article >, biig > wrote: > >> > EASY BEEF BOURGUIGNONNE (from Cooks.com) >> > >> > Approx. 3 lbs. beef (potting, stewing) >> > 2 cans Golden mushroom soup >> > 1 env. Lipton onion soup >> > 1 c. burgundy wine 1 can mushrooms (or fresh mushrooms) > (snippage) > >> >> We don't care for the flavour of wine in our food, so would beef >> broth be an acceptable substitute? I know it won't be "bourguignonne" >> but should be tasty anyway? I've substituted chicken broth instead of >> white wine in dishes before and they turned out fine....tia...Sharon > > Actually, Sharon, I kind of posted it as a joke. Canned this, packaged > that, -- and a glug of red wine. I think you could fake cooking the > beef chunks any way you wanted to. Actually, Barb, some things like this are very tasty in spite of being made with cans and packages. Wine comes in a bottle or a box, no? -- Wayne Boatwright o¿o ____________________ BIOYA |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Melba's Jammin' wrote: > > In article >, biig > wrote: > > > > EASY BEEF BOURGUIGNONNE (from Cooks.com) > > > > > > Approx. 3 lbs. beef (potting, stewing) > > > 2 cans Golden mushroom soup > > > 1 env. Lipton onion soup > > > 1 c. burgundy wine > > > 1 can mushrooms (or fresh mushrooms) > (snippage) > > > > > We don't care for the flavour of wine in our food, so would beef > > broth be an acceptable substitute? I know it won't be "bourguignonne" > > but should be tasty anyway? I've substituted chicken broth instead of > > white wine in dishes before and they turned out fine....tia...Sharon > > Actually, Sharon, I kind of posted it as a joke. Canned this, packaged > that, -- and a glug of red wine. I think you could fake cooking the > beef chunks any way you wanted to. > -- > http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 1-15-2006, RIP Connie Drew LOL....Sharon |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> > Actually, Sharon, I kind of posted it as a joke. Canned this, packaged > that, -- and a glug of red wine. I think you could fake cooking the > beef chunks any way you wanted to. > -- Whew! The only reason I didn't sneer at that one was that I thought it was a joke. ;-) With the current lcd state of affairs here, though, you can be sure a bunch of people can't wait to try it. -aem |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under four > pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a fork-tender cut? I > know I could make pot roast with it, but that's not what I want. A poele would do it. I usually trim and render fat from cuts like this so I have a thin film of liquid fat in the bottom of an ovenable skillet that would hold it and could be covered. Dredge the meat in seasoned flour, covering it generously, and saute to a rather dark brown on all sides. Take the meat out of the pan and put a coarsely chopped mirepoix (celery, carrot, onion) in to sweat for a couple minutes with 1/4 cup of any kind of stock. Put the meat on top, cover and put into your oven. Turn it on to 325. This size hunk of meat will probably take two hours, maybe two and a half. Remove the meat and drastically reduce the pan liquid. Either strain out the solids or puree them. Adjust seasonings. Happy tender beef and gravy. Pastorio |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri 27 Jan 2006 08:15:00a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Bob (this
one)? > Wayne Boatwright wrote: > >> I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under four >> pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a fork-tender >> cut? I know I could make pot roast with it, but that's not what I >> want. > > A poele would do it. I usually trim and render fat from cuts like this > so I have a thin film of liquid fat in the bottom of an ovenable skillet > that would hold it and could be covered. Dredge the meat in seasoned > flour, covering it generously, and saute to a rather dark brown on all > sides. Take the meat out of the pan and put a coarsely chopped mirepoix > (celery, carrot, onion) in to sweat for a couple minutes with 1/4 cup of > any kind of stock. Put the meat on top, cover and put into your oven. > Turn it on to 325. This size hunk of meat will probably take two hours, > maybe two and a half. Remove the meat and drastically reduce the pan > liquid. Either strain out the solids or puree them. Adjust seasonings. > > Happy tender beef and gravy. > > Pastorio > Thanks, Bob. This is a method I like and have done similarly before. I am trying to minimize fat, so will probably not do a gravy. -- Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬ ________________________________________ Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> On Fri 27 Jan 2006 08:15:00a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Bob (this > one)? > > >>Wayne Boatwright wrote: >> >> >>>I just bought one of these at Costco that weights in at just under four >>>pounds. Does anyone have a recipe that turns this into a fork-tender >>>cut? I know I could make pot roast with it, but that's not what I >>>want. >> >>A poele would do it. I usually trim and render fat from cuts like this >>so I have a thin film of liquid fat in the bottom of an ovenable skillet >>that would hold it and could be covered. Dredge the meat in seasoned >>flour, covering it generously, and saute to a rather dark brown on all >>sides. Take the meat out of the pan and put a coarsely chopped mirepoix >>(celery, carrot, onion) in to sweat for a couple minutes with 1/4 cup of >>any kind of stock. Put the meat on top, cover and put into your oven. >>Turn it on to 325. This size hunk of meat will probably take two hours, >>maybe two and a half. Remove the meat and drastically reduce the pan >>liquid. Either strain out the solids or puree them. Adjust seasonings. >> >>Happy tender beef and gravy. >> >>Pastorio >> > > > Thanks, Bob. This is a method I like and have done similarly before. I am > trying to minimize fat, so will probably not do a gravy. So brown it and pour out any residual fat. Chill the pot liquor by dipping a plastic bag filled with ice cubes in it. The fat sticks to the bag. Then thicken with a slurry of wine or coffee or stock and cornstarch and tighten it up. No fat. Pastorio |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
chuck eye roast vs minute roast? | Diabetic | |||
cross rib roast (help) | General Cooking | |||
Roast Shoulder or Chuck Roast Beef | Recipes (moderated) | |||
Roast Shoulder or Chuck Roast Beef | Recipes (moderated) | |||
Cross Rib Roast in WSM | Barbecue |