Bruce wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 15:14:21 -0500, Gary > wrote:
>
>> Bruce wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 16:30:36 -0500, Gary > wrote:
>>>
>>>> A bucket of fresh dog poo? I would have looked up a recipe.
>>>> "Heck, I'd even eat a turd if it was properly prepared."
>>>
>>> You often do, at MacDonald's.
>>
>> Well there ya go. Proof that properly preparing turds can work.
>> Look at all their success...restaurants worldwide, etc.
>>
>> McDonald's sure doesn't give a "turd" about the few that
>> constantly bitch about their food.
>>
>> Example: "I tried one of their hamburgers 20 years ago and I had
>> to spit it out." LOL
>
> I never really minded the taste of their hamburgers or of the turtle
> poo they serve with their matchstick fries. I don't like the whole
> chain, the damage they do, the industry tortured animals they serve,
> the crap they add to their food.
>
They do it ALL just to make you whinge, truly...

Gary wrote:
> Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>> "Wayne Boatwright"
>>> It's probably safe to say that many here are sorely fed up with you
>>> too! There are reasons that there are moderated newsgroups and you
>>> are definitely one of those reasons.
>>
>> Well go to one of those then!
>
> +1 for sure
>
Farcebook RFC awaits!

On 2018-03-31 4:14 PM, Gary wrote:
> Bruce wrote:

>>> A bucket of fresh dog poo? I would have looked up a recipe.
>>> "Heck, I'd even eat a turd if it was properly prepared."
>>
>> You often do, at MacDonald's.
>
> Well there ya go. Proof that properly preparing turds can work.
> Look at all their success...restaurants worldwide, etc.
>
> McDonald's sure doesn't give a "turd" about the few that
> constantly bitch about their food.
>
> Example: "I tried one of their hamburgers 20 years ago and I had
> to spit it out." LOL

That is a bullshit example. Count me among the many who tried McD
burgers years ago and was not impressed. I don't care for their burgers
or their fries and I remain surprised that they are so many people who
actually like it. It would not kill me to eat at McDs. I will admit
that on my way south last month we got a really early start and ended up
having breakfast at one in PA. I opted for the breakfast burrito. It
was edible. It was just some sausage and some scrambled eggs in a wrap.
I had not realized when I ordered that you would need at least three of
them for a meal.

On 2018-03-31 4:15 PM, Gary wrote:
> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>
>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here. You
>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing
>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings. It's no wonder that
>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there.
>
> Now this is not even teasing, just plain mean crap. Perhaps you
> should go back to the moderated RFC facebook or did they kick you
> off?

Don't lose any sleep over it. She thrives on the attention.

On 2018-03-31 4:18 PM, Gary wrote:
> Bruce wrote:
>>
>> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here. You
>>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing
>>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings. It's no wonder that
>>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there.
>>
>> "RFC is rife with posts that are either negative or positive, ofen
>> from the same posters" (Wayne Boatwright)
>
> He takes arguments too far, imo. No need for especially that last
> sentence. He has no idea why Julie is alone now.

Are you kidding. We get a pretty good view of what goes on there. While
she had some people convinced that he had been pretty harsh with her he
was probably more like a saint for having put up with her strange ways
for so long.

On 2018-03-31 4:18 PM, Gary wrote:
> Bruce wrote:
>>
>> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here. You
>>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing
>>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings. It's no wonder that
>>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there.
>>
>> "RFC is rife with posts that are either negative or positive, ofen
>> from the same posters" (Wayne Boatwright)
>
> He takes arguments too far, imo. No need for especially that last
> sentence. He has no idea why Julie is alone now.


You can't figure out why some guy would leave her?

On 2018-03-31 5:19 PM, cshenk wrote:
> Dave Smith wrote:
>
>> On 2018-03-29 1:21 AM, Julie Bose wrote:
>>
>>>> You do understand that any part of a chicken could be used?Â* Or
>>>> turkey, or pork or whatever?Â* That the 'recipe' is guidance for a
>>>> procedure that can be adapted elsewhere?
>>>
>>> Well, no... Given that white and dark meat have different cook
>>> times.
>>
>>
>> That is why it is impossible to cook an entire chicken.
>
> Really? I do that all the time.
>


Not you too?

On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 11:20:06 AM UTC-10, cshenk wrote:
>
> Really? I do that all the time.

I cooked a whole chicken a couple of weeks ago by simmering it in plain water for about 40 minutes. It was perfect. I also roasted a whole chicken by removing the backbone and laying it flat. It was perfect. I've been trying to cook chicken breast by boiling it but they've been a bit on the tough side. It's a problem I'm working on presently.

jmcquown wrote:

> On 3/30/2018 12:40 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
> >On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 11:51:35 -0500, Gary > wrote:
> >
> > > "U.S. Janet B." wrote:
> > > >
> >>>On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 14:11:23 -0500, Gary > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > jmcquown wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Balderdash.
> > > > >
> > > > > lol! Only OLD ppl still use that word! lol
> > > > > You seriously need to sell, get out of the old-ppls sheltered
> > > > > neighborhood and move back into the real world while you still
> > > > > have a few good years left. hehehe
> > > >
> > > > just someone who has an extensive vocabulary, reads a lot and
> > > > wanted to inject the right amount of disdain into this thread
> > > > Janet US
> > >
> > > I read a lot (every single night) but I usually avoid "big" or
> > > rarely used words. That often signals someone just trying to show
> > > off to me. I tend to use more current terms. Call me crude but I
> > > would have said, "Bullshit." Same definition.
> >
> > What you consider 'big' words are simply someone else's working
> > vocabulary. People generally think, talk and speak they way they
> > are,. There is no intent to show off. Others have no way of
> > knowing the limitations of your vocabulary.
> > Janet US
> >
> I don't understand what the fuss is about. My correct use of a word?
> Am I supposed to dumb down in case someone here doesn't understand?
> Sorry, I'm not going to do that. If you have to look up a word or
> phrase, do so. Don't accuse me of being a show off because I happen
> to have a good vocabulary.
>
> Jill

Don't worry Jill, no one minds any of it. For work, I have pretty
'high falootin' lingo but that's a requirement of the job.

U.S. Janet B. wrote:

> On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 10:18:41 -0400, jmcquown >
> wrote:
>
> > On 3/29/2018 3:11 PM, Gary wrote:
> >> jmcquown wrote:
> > > >
> >>> Balderdash.
> >>
> >> lol! Only OLD ppl still use that word! lol
> >> You seriously need to sell, get out of the old-ppls sheltered
> >> neighborhood and move back into the real world while you still
> >> have a few good years left. hehehe
> >>
> > Oh I'm sorry, did the word go out of style? Foshizzle!
> >
> > Jill
>
> I love hornswoggle but it doesn't apply here
> Janet US

Bit widdershins of current vernacular (grin)

Hank Rogers wrote:
> On 3/31/2018 1:49 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> That he's pompous and takes himself too seriously is one thing. But
>> he's also plain nasty.
>
> Says Mr. Snarkopolus!

Hiya brother! Good to see yoose again!

I havent seen yoose since yoose came home on leave. I remember Yoose
seeing ma's giant breasts and trying to hump her. Dad didn't like it and
kicked yoose out. Then yoose imported a woman from british honduras with
big tits! Lawsy, biggest ones in noo yawk.

Yoose go brother! I am glad yoose is back. Do yoose remember when we
would go and sit outside the whorehouses in brooklyn and try to get a
peek up the wimens skirts?

None were as good as maws. And her jewish chicken soup was to die for
.... right brother?

Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2018-03-31 4:15 PM, Gary wrote:
>> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>>
>>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here.Â* You
>>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing
>>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings.Â* It's no wonder that
>>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there.
>>
>> Now this is not even teasing, just plain mean crap. Perhaps you
>> should go back to the moderated RFC facebook or did they kick you
>> off?
>
> Don't lose any sleep over it. She thrives on the attention.
>

"She"?

Wayne is not a "she", you gender bigot.

Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2018-03-31 4:18 PM, Gary wrote:
>> Bruce wrote:
>>>
>>> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here.Â* You
>>>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing
>>>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings.Â* It's no wonder that
>>>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there.
>>>
>>> "RFC is rife with posts that are either negative or positive, ofen
>>> from the same posters" (Wayne Boatwright)
>>
>> He takes arguments too far, imo. No need for especially that last
>> sentence. He has no idea why Julie is alone now.
>
> Are you kidding. We get a pretty good view of what goes on there. While
> she had some people convinced that he had been pretty harsh with herÂ* he
> was probably more like a saint for having put up with her strange ways
> for so long.
>
Why do you always bully women?

Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2018-03-31 4:18 PM, Gary wrote:
>> Bruce wrote:
>>>
>>> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here.Â* You
>>>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing
>>>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings.Â* It's no wonder that
>>>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there.
>>>
>>> "RFC is rife with posts that are either negative or positive, ofen
>>> from the same posters" (Wayne Boatwright)
>>
>> He takes arguments too far, imo. No need for especially that last
>> sentence. He has no idea why Julie is alone now.
>
>
> You can't figure out why some guy would leave her?
>
Why hasn't "megatron" dumped your bully butt?

Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2018-03-31 5:19 PM, cshenk wrote:
>> Dave Smith wrote:
>>
>>> On 2018-03-29 1:21 AM, Julie Bose wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You do understand that any part of a chicken could be used?Â* Or
>>>>> turkey, or pork or whatever?Â* That the 'recipe' is guidance for a
>>>>> procedure that can be adapted elsewhere?
>>>>
>>>> Well, no... Given that white and dark meat have different cook
>>>> times.
>>>
>>>
>>> That is why it is impossible to cook an entire chicken.
>>
>> Really?Â* I do that all the time.
>>
>
>
> Not you too?
>
Better bully her too...

dsi1 wrote:
> On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 11:20:06 AM UTC-10, cshenk wrote:
>>
>> Really? I do that all the time.
>
> I cooked a whole chicken a couple of weeks ago by simmering it in plain water for about 40 minutes. It was perfect. I also roasted a whole chicken by removing the backbone and laying it flat. It was perfect. I've been trying to cook chicken breast by boiling it but they've been a bit on the tough side. It's a problem I'm working on presently.
>


Sous vide perhaps?

On 3/31/2018 3:19 PM, cshenk wrote:
> Dave Smith wrote:
>
>> On 2018-03-29 1:21 AM, Julie Bose wrote:
>>
>>>> You do understand that any part of a chicken could be used?Â* Or
>>>> turkey, or pork or whatever?Â* That the 'recipe' is guidance for a
>>>> procedure that can be adapted elsewhere?
>>>
>>> Well, no... Given that white and dark meat have different cook
>>> times.
>>
>>
>> That is why it is impossible to cook an entire chicken.
>
> Really? I do that all the time.
>
Bird murderess.

Elm wrote:
>Dave wrote:
>>Gary wrote:
>>>Wayne wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here.* You
>>>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing
>>>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings.* It's no wonder that
>>>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there.
>>>
>>> Now this is not even teasing, just plain mean crap. Perhaps you
>>> should go back to the moderated RFC facebook or did they kick you
>>> off?
>>
>> Don't lose any sleep over it. She thrives on the attention.
>
>"She"?
>Wayne is not a "she", you gender bigot.

Um, Wayne is a faggIT, IT, IT, IT... you POS, S, S, S!
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahaha. . . .

On 3/31/2018 5:12 PM, wrote:
> Elm wrote:
>> Dave wrote:
>>> Gary wrote:
>>>> Wayne wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here.Â* You
>>>>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing
>>>>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings.Â* It's no wonder that
>>>>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there.
>>>>
>>>> Now this is not even teasing, just plain mean crap. Perhaps you
>>>> should go back to the moderated RFC facebook or did they kick you
>>>> off?
>>>
>>> Don't lose any sleep over it. She thrives on the attention.
>>
>> "She"?
>> Wayne is not a "she", you gender bigot.
>
> Um, Wayne is a faggIT, IT, IT, IT... you POS, S, S, S!
> Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahaha. . . .
>

Yoose are a closet cowboy, aren't ya Sheldumb?

Remember when yoose and yer brudda used to play with your trouser weasels?

Hank Rogers wrote:
> On 3/31/2018 5:12 PM, wrote:
>> Elm wrote:
>>> Dave wrote:
>>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>> Wayne wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here. You
>>>>>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing
>>>>>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings. It's no wonder that
>>>>>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now this is not even teasing, just plain mean crap. Perhaps you
>>>>> should go back to the moderated RFC facebook or did they kick you
>>>>> off?
>>>>
>>>> Don't lose any sleep over it. She thrives on the attention.
>>>
>>> "She"?
>>> Wayne is not a "she", you gender bigot.
>>
>> Um, Wayne is a faggIT, IT, IT, IT... you POS, S, S, S!
>> Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahaha. . . .
>>
>
> Yoose are a closet cowboy, aren't ya Sheldumb?
>
> Remember when yoose and yer brudda used to play with your trouser weasels?

WHAT? You mean yoose is his brother? Damn ... I thought yoose was my
brother!

He used to talk about yoose and how yoose liked da guys in brooklyn. I
bet yoose licked his weasel lots of times on the families stoop.

Rafe Elm wrote:
> Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2018-03-31 4:18 PM, Gary wrote:
>>> Bruce wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>>>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here. You
>>>>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing
>>>>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings. It's no wonder that
>>>>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there.
>>>>
>>>> "RFC is rife with posts that are either negative or positive, ofen
>>>> from the same posters" (Wayne Boatwright)
>>>
>>> He takes arguments too far, imo. No need for especially that last
>>> sentence. He has no idea why Julie is alone now.
>>
>> Are you kidding. We get a pretty good view of what goes on there.
>> While she had some people convinced that he had been pretty harsh with
>> her he was probably more like a saint for having put up with her
>> strange ways for so long.
>>
> Why do you always bully women?

Uh oh ... Julie's kotex porter is here!

Rafe, be sure you get it tight. Last time it slipped out.

Hank Rogers wrote:
> Rafe Elm wrote:
>> Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2018-03-31 4:18 PM, Gary wrote:
>>>> Bruce wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>>>>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here.Â* You
>>>>>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing
>>>>>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings.Â* It's no wonder that
>>>>>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there.
>>>>>
>>>>> "RFC is rife with posts that are either negative or positive, ofen
>>>>> from the same posters" (Wayne Boatwright)
>>>>
>>>> He takes arguments too far, imo. No need for especially that last
>>>> sentence. He has no idea why Julie is alone now.
>>>
>>> Are you kidding. We get a pretty good view of what goes on there.
>>> While she had some people convinced that he had been pretty harsh with
>>> herÂ* he was probably more like a saint for having put up with her
>>> strange ways for so long.
>>>
>> Why do you always bully women?
>
> Uh oh ... Julie's kotex porter is here!
>
> Rafe, be sure you get it tight. Last time it slipped out.
>
>
Hank, do try and pile on her too.

Bruce wrote:
> On 3/31/2018 3:19 PM, cshenk wrote:
>> Dave Smith wrote:
>>
>>> On 2018-03-29 1:21 AM, Julie Bose wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You do understand that any part of a chicken could be used?Â* Or
>>>>> turkey, or pork or whatever?Â* That the 'recipe' is guidance for a
>>>>> procedure that can be adapted elsewhere?
>>>>
>>>> Well, no... Given that white and dark meat have different cook
>>>> times.
>>>
>>>
>>> That is why it is impossible to cook an entire chicken.
>>
>> Really?Â* I do that all the time.
>>
> Bird murderess.

New form of tweeting?

Rafe Elm wrote:
> Hank Rogers wrote:
>> Rafe Elm wrote:
>>> Dave Smith wrote:
>>>> On 2018-03-31 4:18 PM, Gary wrote:
>>>>> Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>>>>>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here. You
>>>>>>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing
>>>>>>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings. It's no wonder that
>>>>>>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "RFC is rife with posts that are either negative or positive, ofen
>>>>>> from the same posters" (Wayne Boatwright)
>>>>>
>>>>> He takes arguments too far, imo. No need for especially that last
>>>>> sentence. He has no idea why Julie is alone now.
>>>>
>>>> Are you kidding. We get a pretty good view of what goes on there.
>>>> While she had some people convinced that he had been pretty harsh with
>>>> her he was probably more like a saint for having put up with her
>>>> strange ways for so long.
>>>>
>>> Why do you always bully women?
>>
>> Uh oh ... Julie's kotex porter is here!
>>
>> Rafe, be sure you get it tight. Last time it slipped out.
>>
>>
> Hank, do try and pile on her too.

Nope, I'm saving her for you and my evil twin brother, as he don't like
seconds.

Gary wrote:

> Julie Bove wrote:
> >
> > Bullshit! I will not stand for your subterfuge. This is just
> > another one of your whoppers Dave. How dare you sit at your
> > computer spewing your back biting repugnance. Your calumniation is
> > is disgraceful. I am sorely fed up with your loathsome
> > prevaricating. Be off with you! Hie thee to the mucculent
> > hinterlands from whence you came!
>
> lol. Hi Jill! What did you do with Julie?

LOL! Had to look up Muculent. It's an English (UK) term for slimey.
One that didn't really come over to the USA.

On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 10:54:49 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:

>Gary wrote:
>
>> Julie Bove wrote:
>> >
>> > Bullshit! I will not stand for your subterfuge. This is just
>> > another one of your whoppers Dave. How dare you sit at your
>> > computer spewing your back biting repugnance. Your calumniation is
>> > is disgraceful. I am sorely fed up with your loathsome
>> > prevaricating. Be off with you! Hie thee to the mucculent
>> > hinterlands from whence you came!
>>
>> lol. Hi Jill! What did you do with Julie?
>
>LOL! Had to look up Muculent. It's an English (UK) term for slimey.
>One that didn't really come over to the USA.

Whereas the English keep going on about it.