Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So far I've shelled 5 1/2 gallons of them. I'm getting calluses.
-- modom -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "modom (palindrome guy)" > wrote in message ... > So far I've shelled 5 1/2 gallons of them. I'm getting calluses. > -- > > modom Do you raise them? Or do you get a good deal in price for them? I remember one year where we moved there were loads of cherry trees, free for the picking. Whatever possessed me to fill buckets full of them. Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 18:53:29 -0500, "Dee.Dee" >
wrote: > >"modom (palindrome guy)" > wrote in message .. . >> So far I've shelled 5 1/2 gallons of them. I'm getting calluses. >Do you raise them? Or do you get a good deal in price for them? > >I remember one year where we moved there were loads of cherry trees, free >for the picking. Whatever possessed me to fill buckets full of them. > I have a large yard -- approximately three standard lots. There are six pecan trees (used to be seven) in the yard. The wet summer we had this year ended a nearly two-year drought. And the drought-stressed pecan trees went -- ummm -- nuts. They lost limbs from the weight of the pecans, in fact. There are so many pecans in the yard that we've given away more than we've kept. So many that instead of bending down to pick them up, I've taken to sitting on the ground with my bag when I pick them. So many that parts of the yard are crunchy. Shelling pecans is a good antidote to job stress: mindless, repetitive, and just a little violent. -- modom -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "modom (palindrome guy)" > wrote > I have a large yard -- approximately three standard lots. There are > six pecan trees (used to be seven) in the yard. The wet summer we had > this year ended a nearly two-year drought. And the drought-stressed > pecan trees went -- ummm -- nuts. They lost limbs from the weight of > the pecans, in fact. There are so many pecans in the yard that we've > given away more than we've kept. So many that instead of bending down > to pick them up, I've taken to sitting on the ground with my bag when > I pick them. So many that parts of the yard are crunchy. > > Shelling pecans is a good antidote to job stress: mindless, > repetitive, and just a little violent. What are you going to do with them all? It's a nice problem to have, I guess. Freeze them? And I'm curious, what is a standard lot in Texas? nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
modom (palindrome guy) wrote:
> I have a large yard -- approximately three standard lots. There are > six pecan trees (used to be seven) in the yard. The wet summer we had > this year ended a nearly two-year drought. And the drought-stressed > pecan trees went -- ummm -- nuts. They lost limbs from the weight of > the pecans, in fact. There are so many pecans in the yard that we've > given away more than we've kept. So many that instead of bending down > to pick them up, I've taken to sitting on the ground with my bag when > I pick them. So many that parts of the yard are crunchy. > > Shelling pecans is a good antidote to job stress: mindless, > repetitive, and just a little violent. I know they have automatic shellers that can do 1000+ per hour. A few hundred bucks as I remember. But, it does sound like you enjoy doing by hand. -- Reg |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:19:28 GMT, Reg > wrote:
>modom (palindrome guy) wrote: > >> I have a large yard -- approximately three standard lots. There are >> six pecan trees (used to be seven) in the yard. The wet summer we had >> this year ended a nearly two-year drought. And the drought-stressed >> pecan trees went -- ummm -- nuts. They lost limbs from the weight of >> the pecans, in fact. There are so many pecans in the yard that we've >> given away more than we've kept. So many that instead of bending down >> to pick them up, I've taken to sitting on the ground with my bag when >> I pick them. So many that parts of the yard are crunchy. >> >> Shelling pecans is a good antidote to job stress: mindless, >> repetitive, and just a little violent. > >I know they have automatic shellers that can do 1000+ per hour. A >few hundred bucks as I remember. I use one of these: http://www.yardlover.com/products.php?pid=4300 My late mother-in-law gave it to us. > >But, it does sound like you enjoy doing by hand. "Enjoy" isn't a verb I'd use in the context of shelling pecans. But it is a stress relief sometimes. -- modom -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 25, 6:08 pm, "modom (palindrome guy)" > wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 18:53:29 -0500, "Dee.Dee" > > wrote: > > > > >"modom (palindrome guy)" > wrote in message > .. . > >> So far I've shelled 5 1/2 gallons of them. I'm getting calluses. > >Do you raise them? Or do you get a good deal in price for them? > > >I remember one year where we moved there were loads of cherry trees, free > >for the picking. Whatever possessed me to fill buckets full of them. > > I have a large yard -- approximately three standard lots. There are > six pecan trees (used to be seven) in the yard. The wet summer we had > this year ended a nearly two-year drought. And the drought-stressed > pecan trees went -- ummm -- nuts. They lost limbs from the weight of > the pecans, in fact. There are so many pecans in the yard that we've > given away more than we've kept. So many that instead of bending down > to pick them up, I've taken to sitting on the ground with my bag when > I pick them. So many that parts of the yard are crunchy. > > Shelling pecans is a good antidote to job stress: mindless, > repetitive, and just a little violent. I bought 3 or 4 pounds of them a few days ago for $1.50/#. What I like even better are hickory nuts. My sister lives on an acre lot full of shagbarks, but the cursed squirrels get all the nuts because in town you're not allowed to kill them. > > modom --Bryan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nancy Young wrote:
> > "modom (palindrome guy)" > wrote > > > I have a large yard -- approximately three standard lots. There are > > six pecan trees (used to be seven) in the yard. The wet summer we had > > this year ended a nearly two-year drought. And the drought-stressed > > pecan trees went -- ummm -- nuts. They lost limbs from the weight of > > the pecans, in fact. There are so many pecans in the yard that we've > > given away more than we've kept. So many that instead of bending down > > to pick them up, I've taken to sitting on the ground with my bag when > > I pick them. So many that parts of the yard are crunchy. > > > > Shelling pecans is a good antidote to job stress: mindless, > > repetitive, and just a little violent. > > What are you going to do with them all? It's a nice problem to have, > I guess. Freeze them? And I'm curious, what is a standard lot in Texas? > > nancy I collected 30#+ (unshelled) of pecans from my tree this season. Many are in the freezer now. I don't think there is a "standard" lot size, that would vary with the minimum zoning from area to area. Presumably the OP is referring to the usual sub acre city type lot, so three might be around 1 acre or so. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 19:14:45 -0500, "Nancy Young" >
wrote: > >"modom (palindrome guy)" > wrote > >> I have a large yard -- approximately three standard lots. There are >> six pecan trees (used to be seven) in the yard. The wet summer we had >> this year ended a nearly two-year drought. And the drought-stressed >> pecan trees went -- ummm -- nuts. They lost limbs from the weight of >> the pecans, in fact. There are so many pecans in the yard that we've >> given away more than we've kept. So many that instead of bending down >> to pick them up, I've taken to sitting on the ground with my bag when >> I pick them. So many that parts of the yard are crunchy. >> >> Shelling pecans is a good antidote to job stress: mindless, >> repetitive, and just a little violent. > >What are you going to do with them all? It's a nice problem to have, >I guess. Freeze them? And I'm curious, what is a standard lot in Texas? > A quart or two will make decent little Christmas gifts as part of a packet of munchies. We gave three quarts to our daughter this morning. And yes most of them are in the freezer. I believe a standard lot here in Cow Hill is around 75 by 150 feet. When my house was built in 1952, the owner bought the land from a cotton farmer. (He had to wait till the crop was harvested before beginning construction.) There's a survey around here someplace, but I can't put my hands on it right at this moment. -- modom -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg wrote:
> > modom (palindrome guy) wrote: > > > I have a large yard -- approximately three standard lots. There are > > six pecan trees (used to be seven) in the yard. The wet summer we had > > this year ended a nearly two-year drought. And the drought-stressed > > pecan trees went -- ummm -- nuts. They lost limbs from the weight of > > the pecans, in fact. There are so many pecans in the yard that we've > > given away more than we've kept. So many that instead of bending down > > to pick them up, I've taken to sitting on the ground with my bag when > > I pick them. So many that parts of the yard are crunchy. > > > > Shelling pecans is a good antidote to job stress: mindless, > > repetitive, and just a little violent. > > I know they have automatic shellers that can do 1000+ per hour. A > few hundred bucks as I remember. > > But, it does sound like you enjoy doing by hand. > > -- > Reg Any links to those inexpensive shellers? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete C. wrote:
> Reg wrote: > >> >>I know they have automatic shellers that can do 1000+ per hour. A >>few hundred bucks as I remember. >> >>But, it does sound like you enjoy doing by hand. > > > Any links to those inexpensive shellers? I've seen the Kinetic Kracker before and it works well. Many sources via google. I also see them turn up on ebay from time to time. -- Reg |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg wrote:
> > Pete C. wrote: > > > Reg wrote: > > > >> > >>I know they have automatic shellers that can do 1000+ per hour. A > >>few hundred bucks as I remember. > >> > >>But, it does sound like you enjoy doing by hand. > > > > > > Any links to those inexpensive shellers? > > I've seen the Kinetic Kracker before and it works well. Many > sources via google. I also see them turn up on ebay from time > to time. > > -- > Reg Hmmm, not sure that would be any improvement over the arbor press I've been using. I can crack pecans at about a 2hz rate with the arbor press, and it was only $40. What I want to find / build is a fully automated unit I can just fill a hopper on and watch it go. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 25, 7:28 pm, "Pete C." > wrote:
> > > Hmmm, not sure that would be any improvement over the arbor press I've > been using. I can crack pecans at about a 2hz rate with the arbor press, > and it was only $40. What I want to find / build is a fully automated > unit I can just fill a hopper on and watch it go.- Hide quoted text - > > I buy my pecans from the Atwell Pecan Company in Wrens, Georgia and I've always wondered how they shell their tons and tons and tons of pecans they sell nationwide. It must be some golly whopper machine that does this task. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete C. wrote:
> Reg wrote: > >>I've seen the Kinetic Kracker before and it works well. Many >>sources via google. I also see them turn up on ebay from time >>to time. >> > > > Hmmm, not sure that would be any improvement over the arbor press I've > been using. I can crack pecans at about a 2hz rate with the arbor press, > and it was only $40. What I want to find / build is a fully automated > unit I can just fill a hopper on and watch it go. Yes, a functioning hopper would be the next step up. If I come across anything like that I'll post the info. I'm sure anything you build will blow the doors off a Kinetic Kracker. Knowing you it'll have afterburners. -- Reg |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "modom (palindrome guy)" > wrote > On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 19:14:45 -0500, "Nancy Young" > > wrote: >>What are you going to do with them all? It's a nice problem to have, >>I guess. Freeze them? And I'm curious, what is a standard lot in Texas? >> > A quart or two will make decent little Christmas gifts as part of a > packet of munchies. We gave three quarts to our daughter this > morning. And yes most of them are in the freezer. Better than having too many zucchini, right? Heh. > I believe a standard lot here in Cow Hill is around 75 by 150 feet. > When my house was built in 1952, the owner bought the land from a > cotton farmer. (He had to wait till the crop was harvested before > beginning construction.) There's a survey around here someplace, but I > can't put my hands on it right at this moment. Interesting. I was idly curious because I see real estate ads mentioning double lot like that meant anything. I figured twice the size of adjacent lots. Then when you said about your lot, I had a funny-ish thought that a standard lot in Texas would be like a mile square. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
"modom (palindrome guy)" > wrote: > So far I've shelled 5 1/2 gallons of them. I'm getting calluses. > -- > > modom Mine haven't arrived yet. Did you use the wrong zipcode or something? I heard that it's a bumper crop this year. Lotsa rain. -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ Notes about our meals in Tuscany have been posted to http://www.jamlady.eboard.com; 10-16-2007 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
itsjoannotjoann wrote:
> On Nov 25, 7:28 pm, "Pete C." > wrote: >> >> Hmmm, not sure that would be any improvement over the arbor press I've >> been using. I can crack pecans at about a 2hz rate with the arbor press, >> and it was only $40. What I want to find / build is a fully automated >> unit I can just fill a hopper on and watch it go.- Hide quoted text - >> >> > I buy my pecans from the Atwell Pecan Company in Wrens, Georgia and > I've always wondered how they shell their tons and tons and tons of > pecans they sell nationwide. It must be some golly whopper machine > that does this task. > I'm planning on going over there to buy some to send to someone. I'll ask 'em. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> In article >, > "modom (palindrome guy)" > wrote: > >> So far I've shelled 5 1/2 gallons of them. I'm getting calluses. >> -- >> >> modom > > Mine haven't arrived yet. Did you use the wrong zipcode or something? > I heard that it's a bumper crop this year. Lotsa rain. Actually, bumper crop but no rain. Amazingly enough the drought has worked to the benefit of the pecan crops here. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 21:11:26 -0500, "Nancy Young" >
wrote: >Interesting. I was idly curious because I see real estate ads mentioning >double lot like that meant anything. I figured twice the size of adjacent >lots. Then when you said about your lot, I had a funny-ish thought that >a standard lot in Texas would be like a mile square. > Out in West Texas, folks talk about land in terms of sections. A section is 640 acres, or one square mile. Here in the eastern part, we're less expansive. OBPecans: I'm going to shell another quart before I toddle off to bed. -- modom -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 25, 8:34 pm, Goomba38 > wrote:
> itsjoannotjoann wrote: > > > I buy my pecans from the Atwell Pecan Company in Wrens, Georgia and > > I've always wondered how they shell their tons and tons and tons of > > pecans they sell nationwide. It must be some golly whopper machine > > that does this task. > > I'm planning on going over there to buy some to send to someone. I'll > ask 'em. > > Oh please do and post the answer here! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg wrote:
> > Pete C. wrote: > > > Reg wrote: > > > >>I've seen the Kinetic Kracker before and it works well. Many > >>sources via google. I also see them turn up on ebay from time > >>to time. > >> > > > > > > Hmmm, not sure that would be any improvement over the arbor press I've > > been using. I can crack pecans at about a 2hz rate with the arbor press, > > and it was only $40. What I want to find / build is a fully automated > > unit I can just fill a hopper on and watch it go. > > Yes, a functioning hopper would be the next step up. If I > come across anything like that I'll post the info. > > I'm sure anything you build will blow the doors off a Kinetic > Kracker. King of overkill here... > Knowing you it'll have afterburners. Well, you do need to crack and shell them in the winter season, so burning the shells ought to smell good and heat the house. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Goomba38 wrote:
> > Melba's Jammin' wrote: > > In article >, > > "modom (palindrome guy)" > wrote: > > > >> So far I've shelled 5 1/2 gallons of them. I'm getting calluses. > >> -- > >> > >> modom > > > > Mine haven't arrived yet. Did you use the wrong zipcode or something? > > I heard that it's a bumper crop this year. Lotsa rain. > > Actually, bumper crop but no rain. Amazingly enough the drought has > worked to the benefit of the pecan crops here. Not sure where you are, but the next town over from me had massive flooding this spring, so there was certainly plenty of rain around here, just not in the last six months or so. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete C. wrote:
> Goomba38 wrote: >> Melba's Jammin' wrote: >>> In article >, >>> "modom (palindrome guy)" > wrote: >>> >>>> So far I've shelled 5 1/2 gallons of them. I'm getting calluses. >>>> -- >>>> >>>> modom >>> Mine haven't arrived yet. Did you use the wrong zipcode or something? >>> I heard that it's a bumper crop this year. Lotsa rain. >> Actually, bumper crop but no rain. Amazingly enough the drought has >> worked to the benefit of the pecan crops here. > > Not sure where you are, but the next town over from me had massive > flooding this spring, so there was certainly plenty of rain around here, > just not in the last six months or so. Georgia, where more pecans are grown than anywhere else. The drought has caused a more bountiful pecan crop this year than has been seen in decades. The drought is worse than seen in decades also. ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
modom (palindrome guy) wrote:
> So far I've shelled 5 1/2 gallons of them. I'm getting calluses. > -- > > modom > Texan weighing in: This is what I use http://www.redhillgeneralstore.com/A28157.htm It was the first site Google brought up for Duke's Easy Pecan and Nut Cracker. I've use the red nipper-type shellers, where you nip off a piece of the bottom then a piece of the top and the nut should come up whole, but those are callus builders. The Duke's is the best I've used. This has been a bumper crop year for pecans in Texas. -- Janet Wilder Bad spelling. Bad punctuation Good Friends. Good Life |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Janet Wilder wrote:
> Texan weighing in: This is what I use > http://www.redhillgeneralstore.com/A28157.htm > > It was the first site Google brought up for Duke's Easy Pecan and Nut > Cracker. > > I've use the red nipper-type shellers, where you nip off a piece of the > bottom then a piece of the top and the nut should come up whole, but > those are callus builders. The Duke's is the best I've used. > > This has been a bumper crop year for pecans in Texas. Texas may be Georgia in pecan production, that happens some years. Becca |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
"modom (palindrome guy)" > wrote: > On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 19:14:45 -0500, "Nancy Young" > > >I guess. Freeze them? And I'm curious, what is a standard lot in Texas? > > I believe a standard lot here in Cow Hill is around 75 by 150 feet. Standard lots do vary a lot. When we bought our house, it was 60' X 100'. Ours was 60' X 90'. We got a cheap price, so I didn't feel cheated. I worked in San Francisco for a year. The houses I saw all had 25' lot widths. If you wanted to go in the back yard, you had to go through the house. There was no other access. I talked to a fireman there. They had to be very aggressive about putting out fires. You couldn't just let it burn. It wasn't one house, it was the whole block. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Abel wrote:
> > In article >, > "modom (palindrome guy)" > wrote: > > > On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 19:14:45 -0500, "Nancy Young" > > > > >I guess. Freeze them? And I'm curious, what is a standard lot in Texas? > > > > > I believe a standard lot here in Cow Hill is around 75 by 150 feet. > > Standard lots do vary a lot. When we bought our house, it was 60' X > 100'. Ours was 60' X 90'. > > We got a cheap price, so I didn't feel cheated. > > I worked in San Francisco for a year. The houses I saw all had 25' lot > widths. If you wanted to go in the back yard, you had to go through the > house. There was no other access. I talked to a fireman there. They > had to be very aggressive about putting out fires. You couldn't just > let it burn. It wasn't one house, it was the whole block. a 25' wide "lot" is not a lot, it's a speck. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:26:44 -0600, "Pete C." >
wrote: >Dan Abel wrote: >> >> In article >, >> "modom (palindrome guy)" > wrote: >> >> > On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 19:14:45 -0500, "Nancy Young" > >> >> > >I guess. Freeze them? And I'm curious, what is a standard lot in Texas? >> >> > >> > I believe a standard lot here in Cow Hill is around 75 by 150 feet. >> >> Standard lots do vary a lot. When we bought our house, it was 60' X >> 100'. Ours was 60' X 90'. >> >> We got a cheap price, so I didn't feel cheated. >> >> I worked in San Francisco for a year. The houses I saw all had 25' lot >> widths. If you wanted to go in the back yard, you had to go through the >> house. There was no other access. I talked to a fireman there. They >> had to be very aggressive about putting out fires. You couldn't just >> let it burn. It wasn't one house, it was the whole block. > >a 25' wide "lot" is not a lot, it's a speck. Those "specks" are how Chicago lots were divided in the early 1900's. I have a friend who had two of them. He inherited both. The original cost was about $7,000 for both to the ancestor who originally purchased them. My friend charged neighbors to park on them and made enough to pay the taxes and have the lawn mowed. He recently sold them for almost half a million dollars. I guess the "speck" wasn't in his eye. Lou |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lou Decruss wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:26:44 -0600, "Pete C." > > wrote: > > >Dan Abel wrote: > >> > >> In article >, > >> "modom (palindrome guy)" > wrote: > >> > >> > On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 19:14:45 -0500, "Nancy Young" > > >> > >> > >I guess. Freeze them? And I'm curious, what is a standard lot in Texas? > >> > >> > > >> > I believe a standard lot here in Cow Hill is around 75 by 150 feet. > >> > >> Standard lots do vary a lot. When we bought our house, it was 60' X > >> 100'. Ours was 60' X 90'. > >> > >> We got a cheap price, so I didn't feel cheated. > >> > >> I worked in San Francisco for a year. The houses I saw all had 25' lot > >> widths. If you wanted to go in the back yard, you had to go through the > >> house. There was no other access. I talked to a fireman there. They > >> had to be very aggressive about putting out fires. You couldn't just > >> let it burn. It wasn't one house, it was the whole block. > > > >a 25' wide "lot" is not a lot, it's a speck. > > Those "specks" are how Chicago lots were divided in the early 1900's. > I have a friend who had two of them. He inherited both. The original > cost was about $7,000 for both to the ancestor who originally > purchased them. My friend charged neighbors to park on them and made > enough to pay the taxes and have the lawn mowed. He recently sold > them for almost half a million dollars. I guess the "speck" wasn't in > his eye. > > Lou Oh, they're fine for profit purposes, but there is now way in hell (or anywhere else) I could live on such a speck. I'm cramped on 4 acres here, if I didn't have 65 acres elsewhere I'd probably be claustrophobic. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh pshaw, on Tue 27 Nov 2007 04:15:41p, Pete C. meant to say...
> Lou Decruss wrote: >> >> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:26:44 -0600, "Pete C." > >> wrote: >> >> >Dan Abel wrote: >> >> >> >> In article >, "modom >> >> (palindrome guy)" > wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 19:14:45 -0500, "Nancy Young" >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > >I guess. Freeze them? And I'm curious, what is a standard lot >> >> > >in Texas? >> >> >> >> > >> >> > I believe a standard lot here in Cow Hill is around 75 by 150 >> >> > feet. >> >> >> >> Standard lots do vary a lot. When we bought our house, it was 60' X >> >> 100'. Ours was 60' X 90'. >> >> >> >> We got a cheap price, so I didn't feel cheated. >> >> >> >> I worked in San Francisco for a year. The houses I saw all had 25' >> >> lot widths. If you wanted to go in the back yard, you had to go >> >> through the house. There was no other access. I talked to a >> >> fireman there. They had to be very aggressive about putting out >> >> fires. You couldn't just let it burn. It wasn't one house, it was >> >> the whole block. >> > >> >a 25' wide "lot" is not a lot, it's a speck. >> >> Those "specks" are how Chicago lots were divided in the early 1900's. >> I have a friend who had two of them. He inherited both. The original >> cost was about $7,000 for both to the ancestor who originally >> purchased them. My friend charged neighbors to park on them and made >> enough to pay the taxes and have the lawn mowed. He recently sold >> them for almost half a million dollars. I guess the "speck" wasn't in >> his eye. >> >> Lou > > Oh, they're fine for profit purposes, but there is now way in hell (or > anywhere else) I could live on such a speck. I'm cramped on 4 acres > here, if I didn't have 65 acres elsewhere I'd probably be > claustrophobic. > It's all in what you used to. -- Wayne Boatwright Date: Monday, November(XI) 26th(XXVI),2007(MMVII) ******************************************* Countdown 'til Christmas 4wks 4hrs 57mins 5secs ******************************************* On the other hand, you have different fingers. ******************************************* |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> > Oh pshaw, on Tue 27 Nov 2007 04:15:41p, Pete C. meant to say... > > > Lou Decruss wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:26:44 -0600, "Pete C." > > >> wrote: > >> > >> >Dan Abel wrote: > >> >> > >> >> In article >, "modom > >> >> (palindrome guy)" > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 19:14:45 -0500, "Nancy Young" > >> >> > > > >> >> > >> >> > >I guess. Freeze them? And I'm curious, what is a standard lot > >> >> > >in Texas? > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > I believe a standard lot here in Cow Hill is around 75 by 150 > >> >> > feet. > >> >> > >> >> Standard lots do vary a lot. When we bought our house, it was 60' X > >> >> 100'. Ours was 60' X 90'. > >> >> > >> >> We got a cheap price, so I didn't feel cheated. > >> >> > >> >> I worked in San Francisco for a year. The houses I saw all had 25' > >> >> lot widths. If you wanted to go in the back yard, you had to go > >> >> through the house. There was no other access. I talked to a > >> >> fireman there. They had to be very aggressive about putting out > >> >> fires. You couldn't just let it burn. It wasn't one house, it was > >> >> the whole block. > >> > > >> >a 25' wide "lot" is not a lot, it's a speck. > >> > >> Those "specks" are how Chicago lots were divided in the early 1900's. > >> I have a friend who had two of them. He inherited both. The original > >> cost was about $7,000 for both to the ancestor who originally > >> purchased them. My friend charged neighbors to park on them and made > >> enough to pay the taxes and have the lawn mowed. He recently sold > >> them for almost half a million dollars. I guess the "speck" wasn't in > >> his eye. > >> > >> Lou > > > > Oh, they're fine for profit purposes, but there is now way in hell (or > > anywhere else) I could live on such a speck. I'm cramped on 4 acres > > here, if I didn't have 65 acres elsewhere I'd probably be > > claustrophobic. > > > > It's all in what you used to. I'm not convinced of that... Fact is that when they pack animals too close together in a zoo, they fight... When they pack humans too close together in a city, they fight... Think about it and where all the crime and conflict is... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh pshaw, on Tue 27 Nov 2007 07:07:07p, Pete C. meant to say...
> Wayne Boatwright wrote: >> >> Oh pshaw, on Tue 27 Nov 2007 04:15:41p, Pete C. meant to say... >> >> > Lou Decruss wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:26:44 -0600, "Pete C." > >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >Dan Abel wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> In article >, "modom >> >> >> (palindrome guy)" > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 19:14:45 -0500, "Nancy Young" >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >I guess. Freeze them? And I'm curious, what is a standard lot >> >> >> > >in Texas? >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I believe a standard lot here in Cow Hill is around 75 by 150 >> >> >> > feet. >> >> >> >> >> >> Standard lots do vary a lot. When we bought our house, it was 60' X >> >> >> 100'. Ours was 60' X 90'. >> >> >> >> >> >> We got a cheap price, so I didn't feel cheated. >> >> >> >> >> >> I worked in San Francisco for a year. The houses I saw all had 25' >> >> >> lot widths. If you wanted to go in the back yard, you had to go >> >> >> through the house. There was no other access. I talked to a >> >> >> fireman there. They had to be very aggressive about putting out >> >> >> fires. You couldn't just let it burn. It wasn't one house, it was >> >> >> the whole block. >> >> > >> >> >a 25' wide "lot" is not a lot, it's a speck. >> >> >> >> Those "specks" are how Chicago lots were divided in the early 1900's. >> >> I have a friend who had two of them. He inherited both. The original >> >> cost was about $7,000 for both to the ancestor who originally >> >> purchased them. My friend charged neighbors to park on them and made >> >> enough to pay the taxes and have the lawn mowed. He recently sold >> >> them for almost half a million dollars. I guess the "speck" wasn't in >> >> his eye. >> >> >> >> Lou >> > >> > Oh, they're fine for profit purposes, but there is now way in hell (or >> > anywhere else) I could live on such a speck. I'm cramped on 4 acres >> > here, if I didn't have 65 acres elsewhere I'd probably be >> > claustrophobic. >> > >> >> It's all in what you used to. > > I'm not convinced of that... Fact is that when they pack animals too > close together in a zoo, they fight... When they pack humans too close > together in a city, they fight... Think about it and where all the crime > and conflict is... > Then it's a wonder that there's anyone still alive in NYC. There are plenty of other cities not so condensed that have high crime rates. I thought we were talking about residential properties here. Small lots are not at all uncommon in many parts of the country. Ours is 80' x 150', which I find accepetable, though I have lived on much larger properties. -- Wayne Boatwright Date: Monday, November(XI) 26th(XXVI),2007(MMVII) ******************************************* Countdown 'til Christmas 4wks 4hrs 57mins 5secs ******************************************* On the other hand, you have different fingers. ******************************************* |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 27, 8:14 pm, Wayne Boatwright > wrote:
> > > I thought we were talking about residential properties here. Small lots > are not at all uncommon in many parts of the country. > > Ours is 80' x 150', which I find accepetable, though I have lived on much > larger properties. > > Wayne Boatwright > > I lived about 5 miles from where I do now and it had a very large lot and when I bought this house 19 years ago I sorely wished the lot was larger. It's 50 x 150 which is the standard lot size for this older section of town. When I mowed it with a walk behind mower I was wishing it was a 50 x 50 lot!! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
itsjoannotjoann wrote:
> > On Nov 27, 8:14 pm, Wayne Boatwright > wrote: > > > > > > I thought we were talking about residential properties here. Small lots > > are not at all uncommon in many parts of the country. > > > > Ours is 80' x 150', which I find accepetable, though I have lived on much > > larger properties. > > > > Wayne Boatwright > > > > > I lived about 5 miles from where I do now and it had a very large lot > and when I bought this house 19 years ago I sorely wished the lot was > larger. It's 50 x 150 which is the standard lot size for this older > section of town. When I mowed it with a walk behind mower I was > wishing it was a 50 x 50 lot!! Once you're in the acre + range you're on a rider or larger so that's not an issue at all. I rather enjoy moving my lawn for lunch, well about 1/3 of it per lunch. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pete C." > wrote in message ... > itsjoannotjoann wrote: >> >> On Nov 27, 8:14 pm, Wayne Boatwright > wrote: >> > >> > >> > I thought we were talking about residential properties here. Small >> > lots >> > are not at all uncommon in many parts of the country. >> > >> > Ours is 80' x 150', which I find accepetable, though I have lived on >> > much >> > larger properties. >> > >> > Wayne Boatwright >> > >> > >> I lived about 5 miles from where I do now and it had a very large lot >> and when I bought this house 19 years ago I sorely wished the lot was >> larger. It's 50 x 150 which is the standard lot size for this older >> section of town. When I mowed it with a walk behind mower I was >> wishing it was a 50 x 50 lot!! > > Once you're in the acre + range you're on a rider or larger so that's > not an issue at all. I rather enjoy moving my lawn for lunch, well about > 1/3 of it per lunch. DH spends 3 hours mowing -- but this is when he darned well feels like it -- sometimes I see him with his eyes glazed over (or looking in the distance), and the mower is going in a circle -- no coddling this acreage -- it is 'not' a lawn. Just keeping the snakes away from the door at best. Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:07:07 -0600, "Pete C." >
wrote: >Wayne Boatwright wrote: >> >> Oh pshaw, on Tue 27 Nov 2007 04:15:41p, Pete C. meant to say... >> >> > Lou Decruss wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:26:44 -0600, "Pete C." > >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >Dan Abel wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> In article >, "modom >> >> >> (palindrome guy)" > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 19:14:45 -0500, "Nancy Young" >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >I guess. Freeze them? And I'm curious, what is a standard lot >> >> >> > >in Texas? >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I believe a standard lot here in Cow Hill is around 75 by 150 >> >> >> > feet. >> >> >> >> >> >> Standard lots do vary a lot. When we bought our house, it was 60' X >> >> >> 100'. Ours was 60' X 90'. >> >> >> >> >> >> We got a cheap price, so I didn't feel cheated. >> >> >> >> >> >> I worked in San Francisco for a year. The houses I saw all had 25' >> >> >> lot widths. If you wanted to go in the back yard, you had to go >> >> >> through the house. There was no other access. I talked to a >> >> >> fireman there. They had to be very aggressive about putting out >> >> >> fires. You couldn't just let it burn. It wasn't one house, it was >> >> >> the whole block. >> >> > >> >> >a 25' wide "lot" is not a lot, it's a speck. >> >> >> >> Those "specks" are how Chicago lots were divided in the early 1900's. >> >> I have a friend who had two of them. He inherited both. The original >> >> cost was about $7,000 for both to the ancestor who originally >> >> purchased them. My friend charged neighbors to park on them and made >> >> enough to pay the taxes and have the lawn mowed. He recently sold >> >> them for almost half a million dollars. I guess the "speck" wasn't in >> >> his eye. >> >> >> >> Lou >> > >> > Oh, they're fine for profit purposes, but there is now way in hell (or >> > anywhere else) I could live on such a speck. I'm cramped on 4 acres >> > here, if I didn't have 65 acres elsewhere I'd probably be >> > claustrophobic. >> > >> >> It's all in what you used to. > >I'm not convinced of that... Fact is that when they pack animals too >close together in a zoo, they fight... When they pack humans too close >together in a city, they fight... Think about it and where all the crime >and conflict is... ....and some animals are 'pack' animals. maybe most humans prefer groups. your pal, blake |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:24:38 -0600, "Pete C." >
wrote: >itsjoannotjoann wrote: >> >> On Nov 27, 8:14 pm, Wayne Boatwright > wrote: >> > >> > >> > I thought we were talking about residential properties here. Small lots >> > are not at all uncommon in many parts of the country. >> > >> > Ours is 80' x 150', which I find accepetable, though I have lived on much >> > larger properties. >> > >> > Wayne Boatwright >> > >> > >> I lived about 5 miles from where I do now and it had a very large lot >> and when I bought this house 19 years ago I sorely wished the lot was >> larger. It's 50 x 150 which is the standard lot size for this older >> section of town. When I mowed it with a walk behind mower I was >> wishing it was a 50 x 50 lot!! > >Once you're in the acre + range you're on a rider or larger so that's >not an issue at all. I rather enjoy moving my lawn for lunch, well about >1/3 of it per lunch. huh? you some kind of ruminant? your pal, blake |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete C. wrote:
> I'm not convinced of that... Fact is that when they pack animals too > close together in a zoo, they fight... When they pack humans too close > together in a city, they fight... Think about it and where all the > crime and conflict is... The answer is free-range people. -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Bugg" > wrote in message ... > Pete C. wrote: > >> I'm not convinced of that... Fact is that when they pack animals too >> close together in a zoo, they fight... When they pack humans too close >> together in a city, they fight... Think about it and where all the >> crime and conflict is... > > The answer is free-range people. > > -- > Dave > www.davebbq.com No, no! I've heard that people don't like it when other people go off by themselves. That's strange behavior = loner. Perhaps we could just teach them to wander off 'a little.' Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dee.Dee wrote:
> "Dave Bugg" > wrote in message > ... >> Pete C. wrote: >> >>> I'm not convinced of that... Fact is that when they pack animals too >>> close together in a zoo, they fight... When they pack humans too >>> close together in a city, they fight... Think about it and where >>> all the crime and conflict is... >> >> The answer is free-range people. >> >> -- >> Dave >> www.davebbq.com > > No, no! I've heard that people don't like it when other people go off > by themselves. That's strange behavior = loner. > > Perhaps we could just teach them to wander off 'a little.' Maybe a wireless fence / shock collar contraption? -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Spiced pecans | General Cooking | |||
What to do with pecans? | General Cooking | |||
Glazed Pecans | General Cooking | |||
Pecans: How do you get the darn nut out? | General Cooking | |||
cashew or pecans | General Cooking |