Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() What are your reviews of Saveur? $27 for 3 years seems good. I'm in the mood for a cooking mag. Is it worth getting? Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/20/2012 12:38 PM, Janet Bostwick wrote:
> > What are your reviews of Saveur? $27 for 3 years seems good. I'm in > the mood for a cooking mag. Is it worth getting? > Janet US > Saveur is most excellent, IMNSHO. I subscribe to many magazines, and it's one of the few that I keep whole without cutting out particular recipes. I wish I could get 3 years of Saveur for $27! Where'd you find that deal? Sky -- Ultra Ultimate Kitchen Rule - Use the Timer! Ultimate Kitchen Rule -- Cook's Choice!! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:17:54 -0500, Sky >
wrote: >On 7/20/2012 12:38 PM, Janet Bostwick wrote: >> >> What are your reviews of Saveur? $27 for 3 years seems good. I'm in >> the mood for a cooking mag. Is it worth getting? >> Janet US >> > >Saveur is most excellent, IMNSHO. I subscribe to many magazines, and >it's one of the few that I keep whole without cutting out particular >recipes. I wish I could get 3 years of Saveur for $27! Where'd you >find that deal? > >Sky They sent me a personalized mailing complete with a free cloth supermarket shopping bag and a chance to win a KA mixer. That's why I was wondering whether it was all show and no go. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:38:41 -0600, Janet Bostwick
> wrote: > >What are your reviews of Saveur? $27 for 3 years seems good. I'm in >the mood for a cooking mag. Is it worth getting? >Janet US I've been subscribing to it for years. If I could get only one magazine, I only subscribe to 3 anyway, but if I could get only one, that would be the one. koko -- Food is our common ground, a universal experience James Beard www.kokoscornerblog.com Natural Watkins Spices www.apinchofspices.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/20/2012 12:38 PM, Janet Bostwick wrote:
> > What are your reviews of Saveur? $27 for 3 years seems good. I'm in > the mood for a cooking mag. Is it worth getting? > Janet US > A dinner guest got me a subscription. I enjoy it very much, but I wouldn't buy one for myself. We just can't eat that way in this house. -- Janet Wilder Way-the-heck-south Texas Spelling doesn't count. Cooking does. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 20, 10:38*am, Janet Bostwick > wrote:
> What are your reviews of Saveur? *$27 for 3 years seems good. *I'm in > the mood for a cooking mag. *Is it worth getting? > Janet US I've been a suscriber since the 90's. It's one of the best cooking magazines out there. I love the authenticity of their articles and recipes and I always get great ideas. Plus it's a great reaad all by itself. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:38:41 -0600, Janet Bostwick
> wrote: > > What are your reviews of Saveur? $27 for 3 years seems good. I'm in > the mood for a cooking mag. Is it worth getting? > Janet US I get so many really good looking email recipes from Saveur that I think it will be totally worth it. Where did you find that deal? I didn't see it on the internet, but I found this one https://secure.palmcoastd.com/pcd/do...ikey=089CFHWEC -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:33:58 -0700, sf > wrote:
>On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:38:41 -0600, Janet Bostwick > wrote: > >> >> What are your reviews of Saveur? $27 for 3 years seems good. I'm in >> the mood for a cooking mag. Is it worth getting? >> Janet US > >I get so many really good looking email recipes from Saveur that I >think it will be totally worth it. Where did you find that deal? I >didn't see it on the internet, but I found this one >https://secure.palmcoastd.com/pcd/do...ikey=089CFHWEC It came in my mail addressed to me. Your deal is essentially the same, just a different gift. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Janet Bostwick wrote:
> > What are your reviews of Saveur? $27 for 3 years seems good. I'm in > the mood for a cooking mag. Is it worth getting? > Janet US I get it and I love it. That's a great deal! Jinx |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2012-07-21, jinxminx2 > wrote:
> I get it and I love it. That's a great deal! I used to read Saveur. It's a good cooking periodical. If I were to subscribe to a cooking mag, now, I'd choose Fine Cooking. nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 20, 12:14*pm, Janet Bostwick > wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:17:54 -0500, Sky > > wrote: > > >On 7/20/2012 12:38 PM, Janet Bostwick wrote: > > >> What are your reviews of Saveur? *$27 for 3 years seems good. *I'm in > >> the mood for a cooking mag. *Is it worth getting? > >> Janet US > > >Saveur is most excellent, IMNSHO. *I subscribe to many magazines, and > >it's one of the few that I keep whole without cutting out particular > >recipes. *I wish I could get 3 years of Saveur for $27! *Where'd you > >find that deal? > > >Sky > > They sent me a personalized mailing complete with a free cloth > supermarket shopping bag and a chance to win a KA mixer. *That's why I > was wondering whether it was all show and no go. > Janet US My wife gets it and likes it. They send you swag, like aprons and pizza cutters. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 07:09:10 -0700 (PDT), spamtrap1888
> wrote: >On Jul 20, 12:14*pm, Janet Bostwick > wrote: >> On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:17:54 -0500, Sky > >> wrote: >> >> >On 7/20/2012 12:38 PM, Janet Bostwick wrote: >> >> >> What are your reviews of Saveur? *$27 for 3 years seems good. *I'm in >> >> the mood for a cooking mag. *Is it worth getting? >> >> Janet US >> >> >Saveur is most excellent, IMNSHO. *I subscribe to many magazines, and >> >it's one of the few that I keep whole without cutting out particular >> >recipes. *I wish I could get 3 years of Saveur for $27! *Where'd you >> >find that deal? >> >> >Sky >> >> They sent me a personalized mailing complete with a free cloth >> supermarket shopping bag and a chance to win a KA mixer. *That's why I >> was wondering whether it was all show and no go. >> Janet US > >My wife gets it and likes it. They send you swag, like aprons and >pizza cutters. How bad could that be? ;o) Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:38:41 -0600, Janet Bostwick
> wrote: > >What are your reviews of Saveur? $27 for 3 years seems good. I'm in >the mood for a cooking mag. Is it worth getting? >Janet US Thank you everyone for your replies. The magazine sounds like a good one and my order is in the mail. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Janet Bostwick > wrote: > What are your reviews of Saveur? $27 for 3 years seems good. I'm in > the mood for a cooking mag. Is it worth getting? > Janet US My take on it (very limited) is that it is less a recipe magazine and more about the culture surrounding the food. <shrug> Nine bucks a year seems reasonable enough. -- Barb, http://www.barbschaller.com, as of June 6, 2012 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 19:15:49 -0500, Melba's Jammin'
> wrote: >In article >, > Janet Bostwick > wrote: > >> What are your reviews of Saveur? $27 for 3 years seems good. I'm in >> the mood for a cooking mag. Is it worth getting? >> Janet US > >My take on it (very limited) is that it is less a recipe magazine and >more about the culture surrounding the food. <shrug> Nine bucks a year >seems reasonable enough. With all due respect, your take on it is incorrect. koko -- Food is our common ground, a universal experience James Beard www.kokoscornerblog.com Natural Watkins Spices www.apinchofspices.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2012-07-22, Alan Holbrook > wrote:
> Actually, with all due respect, I agree with Barb. It's not that Saveur > doesn't have some very fine recipes, but the recipes are linked to an > article on the culture and food history of the region being discussed. I'm another long time Saveur reader who would agree with Barb and Alan. Saveur is more than a one dimensional cooking magizine. OTOH, that's why I'd subscribe to Fine Cooking. I want a strictly technique howto magazine. If I want culture, I'll read the free NatGeos in the laundry room. ![]() nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 22, 1:19*am, Alan Holbrook > wrote:
> wrote in news:trkm08pmhcnt9qdgg802mca7rqetmd9dbj@ > 4ax.com: > > > > > > > On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 19:15:49 -0500, Melba's Jammin' > > > wrote: > > >>In article >, > >> Janet Bostwick > wrote: > > >>> What are your reviews of Saveur? *$27 for 3 years seems good. *I'm in > >>> the mood for a cooking mag. *Is it worth getting? > >>> Janet US > > >>My take on it (very limited) is that it is less a recipe magazine and > >>more about the culture surrounding the food. *<shrug> *Nine bucks a > year > >>seems reasonable enough. > > > With all due respect, your take on it is incorrect. > > Actually, with all due respect, I agree with Barb. *It's not that Saveur > doesn't have some very fine recipes, but the recipes are linked to an > article on the culture and food history of the region being discussed. > Cooking, as in technique, etc., isn't the main focus. *But that's OK. > That (the culture/history discussion) is the reason I maintain my > subscription. The magazines my mom got at the grocery store were filled with recipes. "Feed family of four on $20 a day!" that sort of thing. Real cooks don't need no steenkeen' recipes. > Of course, I'm also one of those guys who in my younger days bought > Playboy regularly, but solemnly assured everyone I only did it for the > articles... Playboy only rarely ran any erotic material. Only if you were a hair- trigger adolescent would gazing at the respectful nude pictures in Playboy get you off. That was a niche that Penthouse was eager to fill, so to speak, with their pictorials and letters from the editors. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, July 22, 2012 4:19:08 AM UTC-4, Alan Holbrook wrote:
> subscription. > > Of course, I'm also one of those guys who in my younger days bought > Playboy regularly, but solemnly assured everyone I only did it for the > articles... Yeah, yeah....all those James Bond serialized books, huh. Oh, yes, I remember them well. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 19:15:49 -0500, Melba's Jammin' > > wrote: > > >In article >, > > Janet Bostwick > wrote: > > > >> What are your reviews of Saveur? $27 for 3 years seems good. I'm in > >> the mood for a cooking mag. Is it worth getting? > >> Janet US > > > >My take on it (very limited) is that it is less a recipe magazine and > >more about the culture surrounding the food. <shrug> Nine bucks a year > >seems reasonable enough. > > With all due respect, your take on it is incorrect. > > koko > -- > Food is our common ground, a universal experience > James Beard > > www.kokoscornerblog.com > > Natural Watkins Spices > www.apinchofspices.com Oh, gosh, Koko -- no "all due respect" necessary at all. I think it is a wonderful magazine -- my comment was meant to convey that I don't think it's so much about "cooking recipes" as it is about the people, the culture, the community of folks who surround those recipes. I love the pictures -- all of it. I think of it more as a "food" magazine than as a "cooking" magazine. :-) -- Barb, http://www.barbschaller.com, as of June 6, 2012 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 7>,
Alan Holbrook > wrote: > wrote in news:trkm08pmhcnt9qdgg802mca7rqetmd9dbj@ > 4ax.com: > > > On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 19:15:49 -0500, Melba's Jammin' > > > wrote: > > > >>In article >, > >> Janet Bostwick > wrote: > >> > >>> What are your reviews of Saveur? $27 for 3 years seems good. I'm in > >>> the mood for a cooking mag. Is it worth getting? > >>> Janet US > >> > >>My take on it (very limited) is that it is less a recipe magazine and > >>more about the culture surrounding the food. <shrug> Nine bucks a > year > >>seems reasonable enough. > > > > With all due respect, your take on it is incorrect. > > > > koko > > -- > Actually, with all due respect, I agree with Barb. It's not that Saveur > doesn't have some very fine recipes, but the recipes are linked to an > article on the culture and food history of the region being discussed. > Cooking, as in technique, etc., isn't the main focus. But that's OK. > That (the culture/history discussion) is the reason I maintain my > subscription. There you go -- you said it better than I did -- the culture/history discussion part is what I enjoy most. Most people here know I'm a pretty boring cook have difficulty following a recipe besides. :-\ So I look at Saveur as being about food more than being about cooking the food (recipes). -- Barb, http://www.barbschaller.com, as of June 6, 2012 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 24, 6:30*am, Melba's Jammin' >
wrote: > In article 7>, > *Alan Holbrook > wrote: > > > > > wrote in news:trkm08pmhcnt9qdgg802mca7rqetmd9dbj@ > > 4ax.com: > > > > On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 19:15:49 -0500, Melba's Jammin' > > > > wrote: > > > >>In article >, > > >> Janet Bostwick > wrote: > > > >>> What are your reviews of Saveur? *$27 for 3 years seems good. *I'm in > > >>> the mood for a cooking mag. *Is it worth getting? > > >>> Janet US > > > >>My take on it (very limited) is that it is less a recipe magazine and > > >>more about the culture surrounding the food. *<shrug> *Nine bucks a > > year > > >>seems reasonable enough. > > > > With all due respect, your take on it is incorrect. > > > > koko > > > -- > > Actually, with all due respect, I agree with Barb. *It's not that Saveur > > doesn't have some very fine recipes, but the recipes are linked to an > > article on the culture and food history of the region being discussed. > > Cooking, as in technique, etc., isn't the main focus. *But that's OK. > > That (the culture/history discussion) is the reason I maintain my > > subscription. > > There you go -- you said it better than I did -- the culture/history > discussion part is what I enjoy most. *Most people here know I'm a > pretty boring cook have difficulty following a recipe besides. *:-\ *So > I look at Saveur as being about food more than being about cooking the > food (recipes). > > -- > Barb,http://www.barbschaller.com, as of June 6, 2012 Exactly, Barb. Saveur takes you on a journey to far away places, cultures and flavors. They show you how real people in those places make and enjoy the foods they love. I think of it as a cooking magazine that takes you on a journey with each issue. With the descriptions, methodology and recipes along side the 'travelog', I've ventured out into areas of food I would not have tried before. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 07:21:23 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags
> wrote: > > Exactly, Barb. Saveur takes you on a journey to far away places, > cultures and flavors. They show you how real people in those places > make and enjoy the foods they love. I think of it as a cooking > magazine that takes you on a journey with each issue. With the > descriptions, methodology and recipes along side the 'travelog', I've > ventured out into areas of food I would not have tried before. Sounds like the old Gourmet magazine. I want recipes (which only novice cooks follow verbatim), not travelogues and other extraneous wordiness, so I'll stick with Saveur by email which is just recipes. Works for me. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 08:26:09 -0500, Melba's Jammin'
> wrote: >In article >, > wrote: > >> On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 19:15:49 -0500, Melba's Jammin' >> > wrote: >> >> >In article >, >> > Janet Bostwick > wrote: >> > >> >> What are your reviews of Saveur? $27 for 3 years seems good. I'm in >> >> the mood for a cooking mag. Is it worth getting? >> >> Janet US >> > >> >My take on it (very limited) is that it is less a recipe magazine and >> >more about the culture surrounding the food. <shrug> Nine bucks a year >> >seems reasonable enough. >> >> With all due respect, your take on it is incorrect. >> >> koko >> -- >> Food is our common ground, a universal experience >> James Beard >> >> www.kokoscornerblog.com >> >> Natural Watkins Spices >> www.apinchofspices.com > >Oh, gosh, Koko -- no "all due respect" necessary at all. I think it is >a wonderful magazine -- my comment was meant to convey that I don't >think it's so much about "cooking recipes" as it is about the people, >the culture, the community of folks who surround those recipes. I love >the pictures -- all of it. I think of it more as a "food" magazine than >as a "cooking" magazine. :-) Then we are in agreement, it is a "food" magazine chock full of recipes. koko -- Food is our common ground, a universal experience James Beard www.kokoscornerblog.com Natural Watkins Spices www.apinchofspices.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New Special Issue of Saveur | General Cooking | |||
Saveur magazine | Preserving | |||
Saveur Magazine | Barbecue | |||
Saveur Recipe from 2001 | General Cooking | |||
Need info on Saveur No. 1 mag | General Cooking |