[Melba's Jammin']

In article >,
(Charlotte L. Blackmer) wrote:

> I became active in 1994 (had poked my nose in during the previous year)
> and don't remember Miche not being here in RFC.
>
> (IIRC Barb joined in '94 as well. Represent!!)

About then. I'll never forget how I found out about Usenet and the guy
who hooked me up. Somewhere around '94 or '95. I've used more than one
name and address.


--
-Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ
http://web.me.com/barbschaller;
Buffalo Chicken Quesadillas - pictures 2-7-2010

[George Shirley]

Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> In article >,
> (Charlotte L. Blackmer) wrote:
>
>> I became active in 1994 (had poked my nose in during the previous year)
>> and don't remember Miche not being here in RFC.
>>
>> (IIRC Barb joined in '94 as well. Represent!!)
>
> About then. I'll never forget how I found out about Usenet and the guy
> who hooked me up. Somewhere around '94 or '95. I've used more than one
> name and address.
>
>
Is that you Hotsie Totsie? <G>

[pure kona]

On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:34:04 -0600, George Shirley
> wrote:

>Melba's Jammin' wrote:
>> In article >,
>> (Charlotte L. Blackmer) wrote:
>>
>>> I became active in 1994 (had poked my nose in during the previous year)
>>> and don't remember Miche not being here in RFC.
>>>
>>> (IIRC Barb joined in '94 as well. Represent!!)
>>
>> About then. I'll never forget how I found out about Usenet and the guy
>> who hooked me up. Somewhere around '94 or '95. I've used more than one
>> name and address.
>>
>>
>Is that you Hotsie Totsie? <G>
OT: Every time I see the heading for this thread I feel ...and I
could be so wrong-- but shouldn't it say "Who's been posting here
longer than WHOM?"

aloha,
Cea

[Melba's Jammin']

In article >,
pure kona > wrote:
> OT: Every time I see the heading for this thread I feel ...and I
> could be so wrong-- but shouldn't it say "Who's been posting here
> longer than WHOM?"
>
> aloha,
> Cea

That's funny, Cea. When I see it, I think, "Who *cares*? WTF
difference does it make about *anything*?"

--
-Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ
http://web.me.com/barbschaller
Buffalo Chicken Quesadillas - pictures 2-7-2010

[George Shirley]

Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> In article >,
> pure kona > wrote:
>> OT: Every time I see the heading for this thread I feel ...and I
>> could be so wrong-- but shouldn't it say "Who's been posting here
>> longer than WHOM?"
>>
>> aloha,
>> Cea
>
> That's funny, Cea. When I see it, I think, "Who *cares*? WTF
> difference does it make about *anything*?"
>

I can't remember yesterday very well, how the hell would I remember when
I first posted on rfc. I agree totally, what difference does it make,
are there bragging rights attached or did I miss that post?

[Melba's Jammin']

In article >,
George Shirley > wrote
> I can't remember yesterday very well, how the hell would I remember when
> I first posted on rfc. I agree totally, what difference does it make,
> are there bragging rights attached or did I miss that post?


I believe there may have been some weenie-wagging going on earlier,
Jorge. "-)
--
-Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ
http://web.me.com/barbschaller
Buffalo Chicken Quesadillas - pictures 2-7-2010

[Charlotte L. Blackmer]

In article >,
Melba's Jammin' > wrote:
>In article >,
> George Shirley > wrote
>> I can't remember yesterday very well, how the hell would I remember when
>> I first posted on rfc. I agree totally, what difference does it make,
>> are there bragging rights attached or did I miss that post?
>
>
>I believe there may have been some weenie-wagging going on earlier,
>Jorge. "-)

Looks like!

Some people also seem compelled to announce (in at least one case, not for
the first time) how long they've been here without acquiring a Clue(tm).


ObFood: I found bags of eggplant and zucchini at the Berkeley Bowl West
bargain shelf, so made ratatouille in Ye Olde Crockpotte. It's tasty and
a change from the crockpot chili from last week. I had it over noodles
and with parm cheese for lunch today.

I have some sausages in the freezer (some that I made myself at the
Fatted Calf, some that I bought at Boccalone at the Ferry Building last
time I was in SF) that will probably be added to this before I'm finished
eating it.

(The rest are going in sausage, white bean, and greens soup. I got kale
in my farm box.)

Charlotte

--

[Melba's Jammin']

In article >,
"Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote:

> Melba's Jammin' >
> : in
> rec.food.cooking
>
> > In article >,
> > George Shirley > wrote
> >> I can't remember yesterday very well, how the hell would I remember
> >> when I first posted on rfc. I agree totally, what difference does it
> >> make, are there bragging rights attached or did I miss that post?
> >
> >
> > I believe there may have been some weenie-wagging going on earlier,
> > Jorge. "-)
>
> I can't believe this thread is still alive. George, if you can
> unequivocally prove, with 3rd party documentation, you have been posting
> here the longest; It is my understanding your yearly "dues" are waived for
> life. Isn't that the way it works Barb?
>
> Michael

I'll take it up with The Cabal (TINC). :-). If The Cabal (TINC)
approves, I believe there's a bonus in it for you, too: Two free passes
to the annual April Thrkpt Race and a 3-month credit on YOUR dues!
Huzzah!

George IS older than dirt, though, and he *might* be able to provide
documentation of seniority. But I doubt it.

--
-Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ
http://web.me.com/barbschaller
Dom Schallerovych 2-10-2010

[Dan Abel]

In article >,
"Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote:

> Melba's Jammin' >
> : in
> rec.food.cooking
>
> > In article >,
> > George Shirley > wrote
> >> I can't remember yesterday very well, how the hell would I remember
> >> when I first posted on rfc. I agree totally, what difference does it
> >> make, are there bragging rights attached or did I miss that post?
> >
> >
> > I believe there may have been some weenie-wagging going on earlier,
> > Jorge. "-)
>
> I can't believe this thread is still alive. George, if you can
> unequivocally prove, with 3rd party documentation, you have been posting
> here the longest; It is my understanding your yearly "dues" are waived for
> life. Isn't that the way it works Barb?

I'm guessing that you aren't the one paying the bills in your family (my
wife pays the bills in our household). As I remember, the cabal (TINC)
charges strictly by the number of years you have posted to this group,
and it goes *up*, not down. It certainly never hits zero!

I'd be very surprised if George's bill for posting here was much less
than half his total income.

:-)

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

[blake murphy[_2_]]

On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:39:12 -0600, George Shirley wrote:

> Melba's Jammin' wrote:
>> In article >,
>> pure kona > wrote:
>>> OT: Every time I see the heading for this thread I feel ...and I
>>> could be so wrong-- but shouldn't it say "Who's been posting here
>>> longer than WHOM?"
>>>
>>> aloha,
>>> Cea
>>
>> That's funny, Cea. When I see it, I think, "Who *cares*? WTF
>> difference does it make about *anything*?"
>>
>
> I can't remember yesterday very well, how the hell would I remember when
> I first posted on rfc. I agree totally, what difference does it make,
> are there bragging rights attached or did I miss that post?

'mine is longer and grayer than yours.'

your pal,
blake

[blake murphy[_2_]]

On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:05:32 -0600, Melba's Jammin' wrote:

> In article >,
> pure kona > wrote:
>> OT: Every time I see the heading for this thread I feel ...and I
>> could be so wrong-- but shouldn't it say "Who's been posting here
>> longer than WHOM?"
>>
>> aloha,
>> Cea
>
> That's funny, Cea. When I see it, I think, "Who *cares*? WTF
> difference does it make about *anything*?"

i hear there's some kind of old-age benefit.

your pal,
blake

[Dora]

blake murphy wrote:
>
> i hear there's some kind of old-age benefit.
>
> your pal,
> blake

Or a medal for long-term service?

[blake murphy[_2_]]

On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:57:41 -0500, Dora wrote:

> blake murphy wrote:
>>
>> i hear there's some kind of old-age benefit.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
> Or a medal for long-term service?

well, it's doubtful they'll be handing out medals for good behavior anytime
soon.

your pal,
blake

[PeterL2[_2_]]

Melba's Jammin' > wrote in news:barbschaller-
:

> In article >,
> (Charlotte L. Blackmer) wrote:
>
>> I became active in 1994 (had poked my nose in during the previous year)
>> and don't remember Miche not being here in RFC.
>>
>> (IIRC Barb joined in '94 as well. Represent!!)
>
> About then. I'll never forget how I found out about Usenet and the guy
> who hooked me up. Somewhere around '94 or '95. I've used more than one
> name and address.
>
>



I have a confirmed post from 1993, with others from '91-92.

So that makes me 'older' than you.

And you don't like it......... do you?

[blake murphy[_2_]]

On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:51:12 GMT, PeterL2 wrote:

> Melba's Jammin' > wrote in news:barbschaller-
> :
>
>> In article >,
>> (Charlotte L. Blackmer) wrote:
>>
>>> I became active in 1994 (had poked my nose in during the previous year)
>>> and don't remember Miche not being here in RFC.
>>>
>>> (IIRC Barb joined in '94 as well. Represent!!)
>>
>> About then. I'll never forget how I found out about Usenet and the guy
>> who hooked me up. Somewhere around '94 or '95. I've used more than one
>> name and address.
>>
>
> I have a confirmed post from 1993, with others from '91-92.
>
> So that makes me 'older' than you.
>
> And you don't like it......... do you?

believe me, barbs's status here is not at all threatened by the likes of
your ass.

blake

[Melba's Jammin']

In article >,
blake murphy > wrote:

> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:51:12 GMT, PeterL2 wrote:
> > I have a confirmed post from 1993, with others from '91-92.
> >
> > So that makes me 'older' than you.
> >
> > And you don't like it......... do you?
>
> believe me, barbs's status here is not at all threatened by the likes of
> your ass.
>
> blake

ROFL! Want some candy, Little Boy? LOL!

--
-Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ
http://web.me.com/barbschaller
Buffalo Chicken Quesadillas - pictures 2-7-2010

[blake murphy[_2_]]

On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:03:59 -0600, Melba's Jammin' wrote:

> In article >,
> blake murphy > wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:51:12 GMT, PeterL2 wrote:
>>> I have a confirmed post from 1993, with others from '91-92.
>>>
>>> So that makes me 'older' than you.
>>>
>>> And you don't like it......... do you?
>>
>> believe me, barbs's status here is not at all threatened by the likes of
>> your ass.
>>
>> blake
>
> ROFL! Want some candy, Little Boy? LOL!

you're my candy, honey.

your pal,
blake

[Melba's Jammin']

In article >,
PeterL2 > wrote:

> Melba's Jammin' > wrote in news:barbschaller-
> :
>
> > In article >,
> > (Charlotte L. Blackmer) wrote:
> >
> >> I became active in 1994 (had poked my nose in during the previous year)
> >> and don't remember Miche not being here in RFC.
> >>
> >> (IIRC Barb joined in '94 as well. Represent!!)
> >
> > About then. I'll never forget how I found out about Usenet and the guy
> > who hooked me up. Somewhere around '94 or '95. I've used more than one
> > name and address.

> I have a confirmed post from 1993, with others from '91-92.
>
> So that makes me 'older' than you.
>
> And you don't like it......... do you?

Petah, dahling, if you understood how little I care about who's been
here since whenever, I do believe you would be surprised. <grin>
A) I *am* curious to know exactly what it was that prompted your
disclosure of your first post of 1993. B) I doubt you're older than I
am; I'm just about older than dirt.

OB Food: "Oven-fried" chicken leg quarters for dinner tonight ‹ they're
on sale for 39 cents/lb. I'm thinking I'll make some dressing to
accompany it. Likely will boil some potatoes to mash, too. Gravy may
come from a packet mix. Cherry chutney on the side.

(Note to Blake: Thanks for your comment in the thread ‹ I would have
missed Petah's remarks without yours.)
--
-Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ
http://web.me.com/barbschaller
Buffalo Chicken Quesadillas - pictures 2-7-2010

[PeterL1[_5_]]

Melba's Jammin' > wrote in
:

> In article >,
> PeterL2 > wrote:
>
>> Melba's Jammin' > wrote in
>> news:barbschaller- :
>>
>> > In article >,
>> > (Charlotte L. Blackmer) wrote:
>> >
>> >> I became active in 1994 (had poked my nose in during the previous
>> >> year) and don't remember Miche not being here in RFC.
>> >>
>> >> (IIRC Barb joined in '94 as well. Represent!!)
>> >
>> > About then. I'll never forget how I found out about Usenet and the
>> > guy who hooked me up. Somewhere around '94 or '95. I've used more
>> > than one name and address.
>
>> I have a confirmed post from 1993, with others from '91-92.
>>
>> So that makes me 'older' than you.
>>
>> And you don't like it......... do you?
>
> Petah, dahling, if you understood how little I care about who's been
> here since whenever, I do believe you would be surprised. <grin>


Suprised??!! Not really. You seem to care a *great* deal that people
acknowledge that you seem to think you've been posting here the longest,
otherwise why would you keep posting in this thread?



> A) I *am* curious to know exactly what it was that prompted your
> disclosure of your first post of 1993.



Courtesy of one of your scummy 'mates', twitiliger.

It too seems to think because it's been posting here for awhile, that it
'owns' the group.

There's a couple of you like that, on here.


Originally..... awhile back I made a comment that I met my Californian wife
on here, back in the early 90's.

Twitiliger wasn't going to have someone it doesn't like having the same
'street cred' as it has, and called me a liar, so I got the proof to back up
my statements.




> B) I doubt you're older than I
> am; I'm just about older than dirt.



In physical age, yes, you are older than dirt. But I was talking rfc age
(which is why my comment about being 'older' was as seen), and you knew that,
and we're just being obtuse.


>
> OB Food: "Oven-fried" chicken leg quarters for dinner tonight ‹ they're
> on sale for 39 cents/lb. I'm thinking I'll make some dressing to
> accompany it. Likely will boil some potatoes to mash, too. Gravy may
> come from a packet mix. Cherry chutney on the side.


Dressing, gravy, *and* chutney????!!!!


>
> (Note to Blake: Thanks for your comment in the thread ‹ I would have
> missed Petah's remarks without yours.)


Now you're just being a condescending bitch.

You know, people respect you for what you do cooking wise at fairs etc, but
you oughta drop the superior look down your nose attitude........ it just
makes you look like a nasty old woman.

And then seeing the people you kiss ass with, makes me wonder why I don't
just killfile you.


--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

Killfile all Google Groups posters.........

http://improve-usenet.org/

http://improve-usenet.org/filters_bg.html

[skeeter[_9_]]

"PeterL1" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Now you're just being a condescending bitch.
>
> You know, people respect you for what you do cooking wise at fairs etc,
> but
> you oughta drop the superior look down your nose attitude........ it just
> makes you look like a nasty old woman.
>
> And then seeing the people you kiss ass with, makes me wonder why I don't
> just killfile you.
>
>
> --
> Peter Lucas
> Brisbane
> Australia


bwaaaaahaaaaa....peewee making friends.lol.

[blake murphy[_2_]]

On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:14:51 GMT, PeterL1 wrote:

> Melba's Jammin' > wrote in
> :
>
<snip long post bithing abour various things>
>>
>> (Note to Blake: Thanks for your comment in the thread ‹ I would have
>> missed Petah's remarks without yours.)
>
> Now you're just being a condescending bitch.
>
> You know, people respect you for what you do cooking wise at fairs etc, but
> you oughta drop the superior look down your nose attitude........ it just
> makes you look like a nasty old woman.

better a condescending bitch than an absolute fruitcake.
>
> And then seeing the people you kiss ass with, makes me wonder why I don't
> just killfile you.

i think i killfile census would have you outnumbering barb by about fifty
to one.

blake

[Charlotte L. Blackmer]

In article >,
blake murphy > wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:14:51 GMT, PeterL1 wrote:
>
>> Melba's Jammin' > wrote in
>> :
>>
> <snip long post bithing abour various things>
>>>
>>> (Note to Blake: Thanks for your comment in the thread ‹ I would have
>>> missed Petah's remarks without yours.)
>>
>> Now you're just being a condescending bitch.
>>
>> You know, people respect you for what you do cooking wise at fairs etc, but
>> you oughta drop the superior look down your nose attitude........ it just
>> makes you look like a nasty old woman.
>
>better a condescending bitch than an absolute fruitcake.
>>
>> And then seeing the people you kiss ass with, makes me wonder why I don't
>> just killfile you.
>
>i think i killfile census would have you outnumbering barb by about fifty
>to one.

Blake, why bother trying to play on his level? He's obviously deluded.

Anyway, I find the threat of "I should killfile you" hi-lar-i-ous. Not
only does it completely demonstrate that he got stuck some time during
the second month or so of his usenet career and hasn't acquired a clue
since, it really comes across like the Inquisitors from the Monty Python
sketch. Threatening Barb with the killfile is exactly like "Bring out
the comfy chair!"

Meta note: Threatening people with your killfile just makes you (general
you, not just Peter) look like a complete tool. Either do or do not, and
don't make grand announcements. Nobody cares but you.

ObFood: Lunch was mostly-local: seared hamburger patty from Clark Hill
Ranch, potatoes and broccoli from my farm box. Your reminder (I think it
was yours, back to you==Blake) in the sauce thread about How to Cook
without a Book reminded me that I could make a red-wine-and-mushroom pan
sauce to go with that burger, so I did.

Charlotte
--

[PeterL1[_5_]]

(Charlotte L. Blackmer) wrote in
:


>
> Blake, why bother trying to play on his level? He's obviously deluded.


Only in your tiny little mind.

It's an easy term to use when you're scared of the poster just because
he/she won't 'conform' to what you think is right.

As for listening to anything that ****wit 'blake' has to offer, it only
shows how willing you are to scrabble around the floor for any little
scrap thrown to you by the impotent little turd.

Is your self esteem *that* low? If it is, you need help.



>
> Anyway, I find the threat of "I should killfile you" hi-lar-i-ous. Not
> only does it completely demonstrate that he got stuck some time during
> the second month or so of his usenet career and hasn't acquired a clue
> since, it really comes across like the Inquisitors from the Monty Python
> sketch. Threatening Barb with the killfile is exactly like "Bring out
> the comfy chair!"


Once again, you can bluster, bullshit, and make all the inane excuses you
want to justify your crap.... at the end of the day the killfile is a
*very* useful tool, and I don't use it lightly. As I previously stated, I
respect Barb for her culinary abilities, but she, and her little pack of
cronies, are acting like they "own" this newsgroup. They don't. They never
have, and they never will.


>
> Meta note: Threatening people with your killfile just makes you
> (general you, not just Peter) look like a complete tool. Either do or
> do not, and don't make grand announcements. Nobody cares but you.


Once again, that's your opinion, and you're perfectly entitled to it, even
though it's not worth a pinch of shit.




--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrites.

-- Albert Einstein --

[Ophelia[_7_]]

"Charlotte L. Blackmer" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> blake murphy > wrote:
>>On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:14:51 GMT, PeterL1 wrote:
>>
>>> Melba's Jammin' > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>> <snip long post bithing abour various things>
>>>>
>>>> (Note to Blake: Thanks for your comment in the thread ‹ I would have
>>>> missed Petah's remarks without yours.)
>>>
>>> Now you're just being a condescending bitch.
>>>
>>> You know, people respect you for what you do cooking wise at fairs etc,
>>> but
>>> you oughta drop the superior look down your nose attitude........ it
>>> just
>>> makes you look like a nasty old woman.
>>
>>better a condescending bitch than an absolute fruitcake.
>>>
>>> And then seeing the people you kiss ass with, makes me wonder why I
>>> don't
>>> just killfile you.
>>
>>i think i killfile census would have you outnumbering barb by about fifty
>>to one.
>
> Blake, why bother trying to play on his level? He's obviously deluded.
>
> Anyway, I find the threat of "I should killfile you" hi-lar-i-ous. Not
> only does it completely demonstrate that he got stuck some time during
> the second month or so of his usenet career and hasn't acquired a clue
> since, it really comes across like the Inquisitors from the Monty Python
> sketch. Threatening Barb with the killfile is exactly like "Bring out
> the comfy chair!"
>
> Meta note: Threatening people with your killfile just makes you (general
> you, not just Peter) look like a complete tool. Either do or do not, and
> don't make grand announcements. Nobody cares but you.
>
> ObFood: Lunch was mostly-local: seared hamburger patty from Clark Hill
> Ranch, potatoes and broccoli from my farm box. Your reminder (I think it
> was yours, back to you==Blake) in the sauce thread about How to Cook
> without a Book reminded me that I could make a red-wine-and-mushroom pan
> sauce to go with that burger, so I did.

Good post... and nice lunch too...

--
--
https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

[blake murphy[_2_]]

On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:15:37 +0000 (UTC), Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:

> In article >,
> blake murphy > wrote:
>>On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:14:51 GMT, PeterL1 wrote:
>>
>>> Melba's Jammin' > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>> <snip long post bithing abour various things>
>>>>
>>>> (Note to Blake: Thanks for your comment in the thread ‹ I would have
>>>> missed Petah's remarks without yours.)
>>>
>>> Now you're just being a condescending bitch.
>>>
>>> You know, people respect you for what you do cooking wise at fairs etc, but
>>> you oughta drop the superior look down your nose attitude........ it just
>>> makes you look like a nasty old woman.
>>
>>better a condescending bitch than an absolute fruitcake.
>>>
>>> And then seeing the people you kiss ass with, makes me wonder why I don't
>>> just killfile you.
>>
>>i think i killfile census would have you outnumbering barb by about fifty
>>to one.
>
> Blake, why bother trying to play on his level? He's obviously deluded.

but it's so fun and e-z!

> Anyway, I find the threat of "I should killfile you" hi-lar-i-ous. Not
> only does it completely demonstrate that he got stuck some time during
> the second month or so of his usenet career and hasn't acquired a clue
> since, it really comes across like the Inquisitors from the Monty Python
> sketch. Threatening Barb with the killfile is exactly like "Bring out
> the comfy chair!"
>
> Meta note: Threatening people with your killfile just makes you (general
> you, not just Peter) look like a complete tool. Either do or do not, and
> don't make grand announcements. Nobody cares but you.
>
> ObFood: Lunch was mostly-local: seared hamburger patty from Clark Hill
> Ranch, potatoes and broccoli from my farm box. Your reminder (I think it
> was yours, back to you==Blake) in the sauce thread about How to Cook
> without a Book reminded me that I could make a red-wine-and-mushroom pan
> sauce to go with that burger, so I did.
>
> Charlotte

i'm thinking maybe i should buy the book. (i had just checked it out of
the library.) i could use some help with the basics, myself.

your pal,
blake

[Bob Terwilliger[_1_]]

Peter got all defensive (I was going to say "ugly", but he never stopped!):

>> A) I *am* curious to know exactly what it was that prompted your
>> disclosure of your first post of 1993.
>
> Courtesy of one of your scummy 'mates', twitiliger.
>
> It too seems to think because it's been posting here for awhile, that it
> 'owns' the group.
>
> There's a couple of you like that, on here.
>
>
> Originally..... awhile back I made a comment that I met my Californian
> wife on here, back in the early 90's.
>
> Twitiliger wasn't going to have someone it doesn't like having the same
> 'street cred' as it has, and called me a liar, so I got the proof to back
> up my statements.

Yes, you did. Since you seem to place such significance in Usenet longevity,
allow me to point out that I provided proof that I was posting here in March
of 1990.

So that makes me 'older' than you.

And you don't like it......... do you?

Bob (I also mentioned that both Julian Vrieslander and Mark Thorsen were
here before I was.)

[Melba's Jammin']

In article >,
PeterL1 > wrote:

> Melba's Jammin' > wrote in
> :
>
> > In article >,
> > PeterL2 > wrote:
> >
> >> Melba's Jammin' > wrote in
> >> news:barbschaller- :
> >>
> >> > In article >,
> >> > (Charlotte L. Blackmer) wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I became active in 1994 (had poked my nose in during the previous
> >> >> year) and don't remember Miche not being here in RFC.
> >> >>
> >> >> (IIRC Barb joined in '94 as well. Represent!!)
(snip)
> > Petah, dahling, if you understood how little I care about who's been
> > here since whenever, I do believe you would be surprised. <grin>
>
>
> Suprised??!! Not really. You seem to care a *great* deal that people
> acknowledge that you seem to think you've been posting here the longest,
> otherwise why would you keep posting in this thread?

I'm not responsible for what others post; my reply that seems to have
twisted your whities was in response to a comment Charlotte made.

AFA why I keep posting in this thread? I don't usually get into these
****ing contests but I'm bored of the weather and I don't feel like
folding the laundry. :-)

> > A) I *am* curious to know exactly what it was that prompted your
> > disclosure of your first post of 1993.

> Courtesy of one of your scummy 'mates', twitiliger.
>
> It too seems to think because it's been posting here for awhile, that it
> 'owns' the group.

"Own" it? That's rich. I get outspoken every once and a while about
all the new threads started that have nothing to do with cooking food
but I don't think that means I own the group. Heh! If I owned it, that
crap wouldn't appear on *anyone's* server to be filtered.

> There's a couple of you like that, on here.

"Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you."
Poor dear.

> > B) I doubt you're older than I
> > am; I'm just about older than dirt.

> In physical age, yes, you are older than dirt. But I was talking rfc age
> (which is why my comment about being 'older' was as seen), and you knew that,
> and we're just being obtuse.

You were being obtuse? Huh!

> >
> > OB Food: "Oven-fried" chicken leg quarters for dinner tonight ‹ they're
> > on sale for 39 cents/lb. I'm thinking I'll make some dressing to
> > accompany it. Likely will boil some potatoes to mash, too. Gravy may
> > come from a packet mix. Cherry chutney on the side.
>
>
> Dressing, gravy, *and* chutney????!!!!

Well, sure; why not? The gravy goes on *top* of the dressing and/or
potatoes; the chutney just sits to the edge of the plate as a little
glob from the spoon, ready to be moved to fork to mouth. As it turned
out, I didn't serve the chutney; it was just the shicken, dressing, a
mashed potato for Himself, and the gravy. The gravy wasn't too bad,
actually. Knorr brand roasted turkey gravy.

> > (Note to Blake: Thanks for your comment in the thread ‹ I would have
> > missed Petah's remarks without yours.)

> Now you're just being a condescending bitch.

Hey, who are you calling condescending!!? LOL!

> You know, people respect you for what you do cooking wise at fairs etc, but
> you oughta drop the superior look down your nose attitude........ it just
> makes you look like a nasty old woman.

Heck, I've always said I'm not as nice as most people think I am; sticks
and stones and all that, doncha know.

> And then seeing the people you kiss ass with, makes me wonder why I don't
> just killfile you.

Y'know, it kind of makes me wonder that, too! Unless you're bored and
don't feel like folding laundry, too. "-)

--
-Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ
http://web.me.com/barbschaller
Dom Schallerovych 2-10-2010

[PeterL1[_5_]]

Melba's Jammin' > wrote in
:

> In article >,
> PeterL1 > wrote:

>>
>>
>> Suprised??!! Not really. You seem to care a *great* deal that people
>> acknowledge that you seem to think you've been posting here the
>> longest, otherwise why would you keep posting in this thread?
>
> I'm not responsible for what others post; my reply that seems to have
> twisted your whities was in response to a comment Charlotte made.



No, it was a cariety of replies you have made, over a period of time.


>
> AFA why I keep posting in this thread? I don't usually get into these
> ****ing contests but I'm bored of the weather and I don't feel like
> folding the laundry. :-)



You really shouldn't make false excuses.

Isn't that supposed to be againt your religion?


>
>> > A) I *am* curious to know exactly what it was that prompted your
>> > disclosure of your first post of 1993.
>
>> Courtesy of one of your scummy 'mates', twitiliger.
>>
>> It too seems to think because it's been posting here for awhile, that
>> it 'owns' the group.
>
> "Own" it? That's rich. I get outspoken every once and a while about
> all the new threads started that have nothing to do with cooking food
> but I don't think that means I own the group.


As an impartial observer, I have stated *exactly* what goes on in here
between you and a select little group.

If you want to deny it, go right ahead.



> Heh! If I owned it, that
> crap wouldn't appear on *anyone's* server to be filtered.



Rather than take the literal sense, try and act your age for a bit and
look at what I'm saying.

You *do* look down your nose at some posters, and one can feel and hear
the contempt in your postings at times. That's not very Christian like.

You *do* accept the mewlings of the sycophants in here, as if you were
Queen Bee and they were your loyal subjects.

At the end of the day, this is an unmoderated group, people come and go.
Just because you've been posting here almost daily for the last 16 or so
years doesn't mean jackshit....... apart from the fact that you probably
need to get a real life!!



>
>> There's a couple of you like that, on here.
>
> "Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you."
> Poor dear.


It all comes down to one thing, which is *very* evident with you and your
little group of sychophants......... none of you like hearing the truth.



>
>> > B) I doubt you're older than I
>> > am; I'm just about older than dirt.
>
>> In physical age, yes, you are older than dirt. But I was talking rfc
>> age (which is why my comment about being 'older' was as seen), and you
>> knew that, and we're just being obtuse.
>
> You were being obtuse? Huh!



Do try and act your age, not your shoe size.


>
>> >
>> > OB Food: "Oven-fried" chicken leg quarters for dinner tonight ‹
>> > they're on sale for 39 cents/lb. I'm thinking I'll make some
>> > dressing to accompany it. Likely will boil some potatoes to mash,
>> > too. Gravy may come from a packet mix. Cherry chutney on the side.
>>
>>
>> Dressing, gravy, *and* chutney????!!!!
>
> Well, sure; why not? The gravy goes on *top* of the dressing and/or
> potatoes; the chutney just sits to the edge of the plate as a little
> glob from the spoon, ready to be moved to fork to mouth. As it turned
> out, I didn't serve the chutney; it was just the shicken, dressing, a
> mashed potato for Himself, and the gravy. The gravy wasn't too bad,
> actually. Knorr brand roasted turkey gravy.


I realised afterwards that your "dressing" is actually what we call
'stuffing'.

'Dressing' over here is what we put on salads. Like Balsamic and EVOO
mixed together.

Or Ranch Dressing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranch_dressing




>
> Heck, I've always said I'm not as nice as most people think I am; sticks
> and stones and all that, doncha know.



Not very Christian like, is it?


I also don't like hypocrites. People who go to church, and tell everyone
they go to church, and then act like an asshole when they are away fron
the church. Usually they're the sort of people who think they can do and
say as they please, because they'll go to church on Sunday (or whenever)
and 'confess their sins' and start all over again.

And that was *not* aimed specifically at you.

Although........ if the cap fits.




--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrites.

-- Albert Einstein --

[Omelet[_7_]]

In article >,
PeterL1 > wrote:

> I realised afterwards that your "dressing" is actually what we call
> 'stuffing'.
>
> 'Dressing' over here is what we put on salads. Like Balsamic and EVOO
> mixed together.
>
> Or Ranch Dressing.

"Dressing" as in Salad dressing is the same thing here too dear, but the
word is used for two different things.

"Dressing" is indeed "Stuffing" but not stuffed into a bird carcass so
the terms are used for the same dish depending on how it's treated.
It's "dressing" if it would be "stuffing" but served separate from the
bird and baked in it's own dish.
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe:

[blake murphy[_2_]]

On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:03:06 -0600, Melba's Jammin' wrote:

> In article >,
> PeterL2 > wrote:
>
>> Melba's Jammin' > wrote in news:barbschaller-
>> :
>>
>>> In article >,
>>> (Charlotte L. Blackmer) wrote:
>>>
>>>> I became active in 1994 (had poked my nose in during the previous year)
>>>> and don't remember Miche not being here in RFC.
>>>>
>>>> (IIRC Barb joined in '94 as well. Represent!!)
>>>
>>> About then. I'll never forget how I found out about Usenet and the guy
>>> who hooked me up. Somewhere around '94 or '95. I've used more than one
>>> name and address.
>
>> I have a confirmed post from 1993, with others from '91-92.
>>
>> So that makes me 'older' than you.
>>
>> And you don't like it......... do you?
>
> Petah, dahling, if you understood how little I care about who's been
> here since whenever, I do believe you would be surprised. <grin>
> A) I *am* curious to know exactly what it was that prompted your
> disclosure of your first post of 1993. B) I doubt you're older than I
> am; I'm just about older than dirt.
>

> (Note to Blake: Thanks for your comment in the thread ‹ I would have
> missed Petah's remarks without yours.)

well, i feel a little guilty about bringing peter's remarks to anyone's
attention.

your pal,
blake