[Bob Terwilliger[_1_]]

sf wrote:

> I have no idea what year I came here and I haven't been able to google my
> first post for years. I know a key word but google doesn't burp up the
> post I'm thinking of.

Any particular reason you're being so mysterious about the "key word" or
other details of the post you're trying to find?

Bob

[sf[_9_]]

On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:01:35 -0800, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

>sf wrote:
>
>> I have no idea what year I came here and I haven't been able to google my
>> first post for years. I know a key word but google doesn't burp up the
>> post I'm thinking of.
>
>Any particular reason you're being so mysterious about the "key word" or
>other details of the post you're trying to find?
>
I'm not being mysterious at all. Didn't think anybody would care.
Who did you post as back then?

--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

[Bob Terwilliger[_1_]]

sf wrote:

>>> I have no idea what year I came here and I haven't been able to google
>>> my first post for years. I know a key word but google doesn't burp up
>>> the post I'm thinking of.
>>
>> Any particular reason you're being so mysterious about the "key word" or
>> other details of the post you're trying to find?
>>
> I'm not being mysterious at all. Didn't think anybody would care.

I found your posts from 1996 when you weren't able to. Maybe I can find the
one you're looking for earlier. What do you recall about the earlier post?


> Who did you post as back then?

I answered that question from you when you asked two weeks ago. Why should I
bother telling you again, when you just disregard the answer and keep asking
the question?

Bob

[PeterLucas (o/s)]

On 19 Jan, 21:20, "Booble Twitiliger" >
wrote:
> sf wrote:
> >>> I have no idea what year I came here and I haven't been able to google
> >>> my first post for years. I know a key word but google doesn't burp up
> >>> the post I'm thinking of.
>
> >> Any particular reason you're being so mysterious about the "key word" or
> >> other details of the post you're trying to find?
>
> > I'm not being mysterious at all. *Didn't think anybody would care.
>
> I found your posts from 1996 when you weren't able to.


And yet you couldn't find mine from 92-93??


>Maybe I can find the
> one you're looking for earlier.


And maybe you're just full of shit.


Well, not maybe.


And that probably extends to your supposed 'military career'.

Vietnam vet....... yeah sure, I have no doubt that you probably may
have been there.

But 10-1 you were a REMF.


> What do you recall about the earlier post?

You're the 'supposed' internet defective........ errrrrrrr,
detective....... you go find it if it's so ****ing important to you.

You seem to have severe 'internet inferiority issues' if it seems like
someone could have been here "longer" than you.

Quite apart from the fact that you post bogus "menus" all the time.


You've been proven once to be a complete and utter ****ing liar (by
me) as far as telling people when they started posting and when they
didn't. (Funny that, as soon as I hit you with the proof, you shut the
**** up and have avoided the subject ever since!!
ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Way to go, Booble bob Twitiliger.

Why don't you just take your (***) insecurities and **** off?


>
> > Who did you post as back then?
>
> I answered that question from you when you asked two weeks ago. Why should I
> bother telling you again, when you just disregard the answer and keep asking
> the question?


You arrogant little ****ing twerp.

That just goes to show, *totally*, how ****ing insignificant you are.


Go away, Twitliliger, and release your "beard", so that she can lead a
normal life without you.

[Bob Terwilliger[_1_]]

Peter was still stupid, and couldn't get his story straight:

>> I found your posts from 1996 when you weren't able to.
>
> And yet you couldn't find mine from 92-93??

Not until you provided the link, no. Congratulations, you win the "obscure
piece of shit" award for the week! How much of it will you eat right now,
and how much will you save for later?


> Vietnam vet....... yeah sure, I have no doubt that you probably may have
> been there.
>
> But 10-1 you were a REMF.

What? I never claimed to be a Vietnam vet. I was only 16 years old when the
last helicopter left Saigon. You must have me confused with someone else who
makes you feel all gooey inside. I am a Praying Mantis vet, an Urgent Fury
vet, a Peace for Galilee vet, a Desert Shield vet, and a Desert Storm vet,
though.


> Quite apart from the fact that you post bogus "menus" all the time.

Your envy is showing again! LOL

You only *think* the menus are bogus because they are beyond the ability of
a dull-witted clumsy hominid like you. In many cases I've posted pictures,
though I don't feel the obsessive need for approval that you seem to feel.


> You've been proven once to be a complete and utter ****ing liar (by me) as
> far as telling people when they started posting and when they didn't.
> (Funny that, as soon as I hit you with the proof, you shut the **** up and
> have avoided the subject ever since!!

I shut up? No, I admitted that I was wrong:
Message-ID: >

What more do you think needs to be said? That you are even more worthless a
****tard now than you were then?


> You arrogant little ****ing twerp.

Ahhh... now we get to the heart of the matter! You feel threatened by me!
Has your breadwinner been expressing discontent with you again, and casting
her eye toward the 90% of men who are *better* than you? Back in my Navy
days, Australian women threw themselves at American sailors left and right,
because they knew they'd be SATISFIED. It's entirely possible that I ****ed
her bow-legged when my ship visited Australia in the mid-nineties, and ever
since that time, you have failed to measure up -- if you know what I mean!

Bob

[PeterLucas (o/s)]

On 19 Jan, 23:27, "Bob Terwilliger" >
wrote:
> Peter was still stupid, and couldn't get his story straight:
>
> >> I found your posts from 1996 when you weren't able to.
>
> > And yet you couldn't find mine from 92-93??
>
> Not until you provided the link, no.



Ahhhhh, so your self proclaimed staus as "internet defec.....errrr,
detective" is a pile of shit.

Thank you for clearing that up.


>
> > But 10-1 you were a REMF.
>
> What? I never claimed to be a Vietnam vet. I was only 16 years old when the
> last helicopter left Saigon. You must have me confused with someone else who
> makes you feel all gooey inside. I am a Praying Mantis vet, an Urgent Fury
> vet, a Peace for Galilee vet, a Desert Shield vet, and a Desert Storm vet,
> though.


BFD.

You spent the time on a nice safe ship, right *away* from any danger.

Typical of you.


>
> > Quite apart from the fact that you post bogus "menus" all the time.
>
> Your envy is showing again! LOL
>
> You only *think* the menus are bogus because they are beyond the ability of
> a dull-witted clumsy hominid like you.

ROFLMAO!!!


Many, *many* people on here have called you out on your 'supposed'
menus.

And all you do is bluster, bullshit, and attack.

ergo, you are a fraud.


>In many cases I've posted pictures,


photobucket.com

Open up an account and put all your 'pictures' up there.

It doesn't cost you anything, as i know that's very important for you.



> though I don't feel the obsessive need for approval that you seem to feel..


It's a food group, I post urls to pictures of food that *I* have made.

And you dissaprove???

Jealousy???? MUCH!!!!!



>
> > You've been proven once to be a complete and utter ****ing liar (by me) as
> > far as telling people when they started posting and when they didn't.
> > (Funny that, as soon as I hit you with the proof, you shut the **** up and
> > have avoided *the subject ever *since!!
>
> I shut up? No, I admitted that I was wrong:
> Message-ID: >


I don't see an admission of your stupidity there....... all i see is a
'Message ID'.

Once again, you think that 'bullshit will baffle brains'.

Post your apology in full, ***-boi.

Otherwise, all people will see is that you are a ****ing liar.........
as per usual.

>
> What more do you think needs to be said? That you are even more worthless a
> ****tard now than you were then?
>
> > You arrogant little ****ing twerp.
>
> Ahhh... now we get to the heart of the matter! You feel threatened by me!



Errrrrrrrrr, not at all, ***-boi.


My comment "You arrogant little ****ing twerp" was in reply to the
condescending manner in which you replied to a female member of this
group.

But that's you all over, isn' t it Boobie twitiliger??


> Has your breadwinner been expressing discontent with you again, and casting
> her eye toward the 90% of men who are *better* than you? Back in my Navy
> days, Australian women threw themselves at American sailors left and right,
> because they knew they'd be SATISFIED. It's entirely possible that I ****ed
> her bow-legged when my ship visited Australia in the mid-nineties, and ever
> since that time, you have failed to measure up -- if you know what I mean!



Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, my SO isn't black.


It's a well know fact here in Brisbane that in the mid-nineties, our
black population went down dramatically after you ******s came into
port!!!

Seems the blacks were the only 'score' you could get, and most of you
got c*nt struck and married them and took them back home!!
ROFLMFAO!!!!!

Quite apart from that.......... the SO has seen your 'pic' .


Lin is obviously sight challenged.

[Bob Terwilliger[_1_]]

Peter was still stupid and couldn't get his story (or his sexual
orientation) straight:

> You spent the time on a nice safe ship, right *away* from any danger.

I'm thinking I've experienced just about ten years of combat ops more than
you, washout.


> Many, *many* people on here have called you out on your 'supposed' menus.

Name six of them.


> And all you do is bluster, bullshit, and attack.
>
> ergo, you are a fraud.

Nope. Several people here have seen me cook and been delighted with the
results. Can you say the same? No, I don't think you can -- both because you
have no friends and because you're a shitty cook.


> photobucket.com
>
> Open up an account and put all your 'pictures' up there.
>
> It doesn't cost you anything, as i know that's very important for you.

Tinypic works just fine. You have to be smart enough to click on the link,
though I guess that level of intelligence is just outside your reach.


>> though I don't feel the obsessive need for approval that you seem to
>> feel.
>
> It's a food group, I post urls to pictures of food that *I* have made.
>
> And you dissaprove???
>
> Jealousy???? MUCH!!!!!

Jealous of pictures you post? Why would I be jealous of that? I'm just
saying that your obsessive posting of pictures is indicative of a desperate
need to be noticed and approved. Did your mother neglect you? Is that why
you get so frenetic in your attention-seeking efforts?


>> I shut up? No, I admitted that I was wrong:
>> Message-ID: >
>
> I don't see an admission of your stupidity there....... all i see is a
> 'Message ID'.

You don't know how to retrieve a message using a Message ID? HAHAHAHAHAHAH!
Maybe you can ask a twelve-year-old to help you with that, shit-for-brains.


>> Ahhh... now we get to the heart of the matter! You feel threatened by me!
>
> Errrrrrrrrr, not at all, ***-boi.

"Methinks the lady doth protest too much." It's plain to see that even
through the filter of this text-based medium, my masculinity confuses and
arouses you, and so you hysterically deny the attraction you manifestly
feel. Poor, poor, Peter: Stupid, ***, feckless, weak, clumsy, and saddled
with debilitating insecurity. NO WONDER you couldn't stay in the military!

BTW, I knew there was no way you really had me killfiled. You envy my
cooking skills, and hope to learn from me. It's really too bad; if you
weren't so stupid you might have a fighting chance of learning how to cook
something other than frozen commercially-prepared meals. Ruth deserves
better, doesn't she?

Bob

[Jeßus[_3_]]

In article >,
said...
:
:Peter was still stupid, and couldn't get his story straight:
:
:>> I found your posts from 1996 when you weren't able to.
:>
:> And yet you couldn't find mine from 92-93??
:
:Not until you provided the link, no. Congratulations, you win the "obscure
iece of shit" award for the week! How much of it will you eat right now,
:and how much will you save for later?
:
:
:> Vietnam vet....... yeah sure, I have no doubt that you probably may have
:> been there.
:>
:> But 10-1 you were a REMF.
:
:What? I never claimed to be a Vietnam vet. I was only 16 years old when the
:last helicopter left Saigon. You must have me confused with someone else who
:makes you feel all gooey inside. I am a Praying Mantis vet, an Urgent Fury
:vet, a Peace for Galilee vet, a Desert Shield vet, and a Desert Storm vet,
:though.
:
:
:> Quite apart from the fact that you post bogus "menus" all the time.
:
:Your envy is showing again! LOL
:
:You only *think* the menus are bogus because they are beyond the ability of
:a dull-witted clumsy hominid like you. In many cases I've posted pictures,
:though I don't feel the obsessive need for approval that you seem to feel.
:
:
:> You've been proven once to be a complete and utter ****ing liar (by me) as
:> far as telling people when they started posting and when they didn't.
:> (Funny that, as soon as I hit you with the proof, you shut the **** up and
:> have avoided the subject ever since!!
:
:I shut up? No, I admitted that I was wrong:
:Message-ID: >
:
:What more do you think needs to be said? That you are even more worthless a
:****tard now than you were then?
:
:
:> You arrogant little ****ing twerp.
:
:Ahhh... now we get to the heart of the matter! You feel threatened by me!
:Has your breadwinner been expressing discontent with you again, and casting
:her eye toward the 90% of men who are *better* than you? Back in my Navy
:days, Australian women threw themselves at American sailors left and right,
:because they knew they'd be SATISFIED. It's entirely possible that I ****ed
:her bow-legged when my ship visited Australia in the mid-nineties, and ever
:since that time, you have failed to measure up -- if you know what I mean!

LOL!
Right to the heart of the matter indeed.

[sf[_9_]]

On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:20:04 -0800, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

>sf wrote:
>
>>>> I have no idea what year I came here and I haven't been able to google
>>>> my first post for years. I know a key word but google doesn't burp up
>>>> the post I'm thinking of.
>>>
>>> Any particular reason you're being so mysterious about the "key word" or
>>> other details of the post you're trying to find?
>>>
>> I'm not being mysterious at all. Didn't think anybody would care.
>
>I found your posts from 1996 when you weren't able to. Maybe I can find the
>one you're looking for earlier. What do you recall about the earlier post?
>
'96 sounds about right.
>
>> Who did you post as back then?
>
>I answered that question from you when you asked two weeks ago. Why should I
>bother telling you again, when you just disregard the answer and keep asking
>the question?
>
Oh, so I'm supposed to tattoo it on my arm? <shrug> Some people
think they're at the center of the universe.


--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

[Bob Terwilliger[_1_]]

sf wrote:

>>> Who did you post as back then?
>>
>> I answered that question from you when you asked two weeks ago. Why
>> should I bother telling you again, when you just disregard the answer and
>> keep asking the question?
>>
> Oh, so I'm supposed to tattoo it on my arm? <shrug> Some people
> think they're at the center of the universe.

Then GIYF.

Bob

[sf[_9_]]

On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:53:50 -0800, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

>sf wrote:
>
>>>> Who did you post as back then?
>>>
>>> I answered that question from you when you asked two weeks ago. Why
>>> should I bother telling you again, when you just disregard the answer and
>>> keep asking the question?
>>>
>> Oh, so I'm supposed to tattoo it on my arm? <shrug> Some people
>> think they're at the center of the universe.
>
>Then GIYF.
>
Last time I looked, it wasn't.


--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

[WTF[_2_]]

On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:32:43 -0800, sf > wrote:

>On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:01:35 -0800, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:
>
>>sf wrote:
>>
>>> I have no idea what year I came here and I haven't been able to google my
>>> first post for years. I know a key word but google doesn't burp up the
>>> post I'm thinking of.
>>
>>Any particular reason you're being so mysterious about the "key word" or
>>other details of the post you're trying to find?
>>
>I'm not being mysterious at all. Didn't think anybody would care.
>Who did you post as back then?

Does it matter, stop stroking your ego

[Michel Boucher[_3_]]

WTF > wrote in news:0gcbl5p1kght0omlcgtt9mn5418maqod3s@
4ax.com:

>>I'm not being mysterious at all. Didn't think anybody would care.
>>Who did you post as back then?
>
> Does it matter, stop stroking your ego

And here, ladies and gentlemen is one example among many of thread
degeneration. Topics quickly cease to be adhered to and *we* get into
****ing matches and one-upmanship and pathetic whinging about this and
that.

QED.

--

I have nothing against God.
It's his fan club I can't stand.

spotted on a poster

[WTF[_2_]]

On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:34:33 -0600, Michel Boucher
> wrote:

>WTF > wrote in news:0gcbl5p1kght0omlcgtt9mn5418maqod3s@
>4ax.com:
>
>>>I'm not being mysterious at all. Didn't think anybody would care.
>>>Who did you post as back then?
>>
>> Does it matter, stop stroking your ego
>
>And here, ladies and gentlemen is one example among many of thread
>degeneration. Topics quickly cease to be adhered to and *we* get into
>****ing matches and one-upmanship and pathetic whinging about this and
>that.
>
>QED.

...and Michel Boucher can always be counted on to comment every time,
whinny bitch.

[Michel Boucher[_3_]]

WTF > wrote in news:s9ubl558g2rh3g3up0nriv65hvm19rib7s@
4ax.com:

> ..and Michel Boucher can always be counted on to comment every time,
> whinny bitch.

And here you see the best example so far of homo incommodo, an extinct
branch of the unfortunately longer lasting homo escator domini, who until
recently inhabited the plains of usenet boredom.

--

I have nothing against God.
It's his fan club I can't stand.

spotted on a poster

[WTF[_2_]]

On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:16:07 -0600, Michel Boucher
> wrote:

>WTF > wrote in news:s9ubl558g2rh3g3up0nriv65hvm19rib7s@
>4ax.com:
>
>> ..and Michel Boucher can always be counted on to comment every time,
>> whinny bitch.
>
>And here you see the best example so far of homo incommodo, an extinct
>branch of the unfortunately longer lasting homo escator domini, who until
>recently inhabited the plains of usenet boredom.

Why do you always have to be so negative? Is it genetic, or is it
that you're nothing but a whinny bitch?

[sf[_9_]]

On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:34:33 -0600, Michel Boucher
> wrote:

>WTF > wrote in news:0gcbl5p1kght0omlcgtt9mn5418maqod3s@
>4ax.com:
>
>>>I'm not being mysterious at all. Didn't think anybody would care.
>>>Who did you post as back then?
>>
>> Does it matter, stop stroking your ego
>
>And here, ladies and gentlemen is one example among many of thread
>degeneration. Topics quickly cease to be adhered to and *we* get into
>****ing matches and one-upmanship and pathetic whinging about this and
>that.
>
You forgot denigration and name calling.


--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

[Michel Boucher[_3_]]

sf > wrote in news:9l0cl55utatrk8cu8ist3t57gmj19ba7hi@
4ax.com:

>>And here, ladies and gentlemen is one example among many of thread
>>degeneration. Topics quickly cease to be adhered to and *we* get into
>>****ing matches and one-upmanship and pathetic whinging about this and
>>that.
>
> You forgot denigration and name calling.

It was covered under pathetic whinging.

--

I have nothing against God.
It's his fan club I can't stand.

spotted on a poster

[PeterL2[_2_]]

sf > wrote in
news
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:01:35 -0800, "Bob Terwilliger"
> > wrote:
>
>>sf wrote:
>>
>>> I have no idea what year I came here and I haven't been able to
>>> google my first post for years. I know a key word but google doesn't
>>> burp up the post I'm thinking of.
>>
>>Any particular reason you're being so mysterious about the "key word"
>>or other details of the post you're trying to find?
>>
> I'm not being mysterious at all. Didn't think anybody would care.
> Who did you post as back then?
>


Boobie Bob???


Oh, no......... hang on......... it was 'Secret Squirrel'.

So secret, you can't find anything it posted.