In article >,
blake murphy > wrote:

> > Oh the majority come in sick and leave well, but there have been
> > occasions where someone not so bad left feet first. Rare (thank the
> > gods) but I've seen it happen.
>
> of course sometimes bad things happen. but if your appendix bursts, the
> chiropractor won't be much help.

Yah. But my Chiro' was a big help this morning with the pain I've had
for a few days from the degenerated disks in my neck. They DO have
their place. No MD could have done for me what he did!

>
> > They are fixin' to do a trans esophageal ultrasound for his heart this
> > afternoon to get a better look at the valve problem. They just called me
> > for phone permission about 1/2 hour ago.
>
> i hope he has a good outcome.
>
> your pal,
> blake

They had to delay it to today. Somebody did not read the chart and fed
him. Needed to be NPO for 8 hours.
--
Peace! Om

I find hope in the darkest of days, and focus in the brightest. I do not judge the universe. -- Dalai Lama

On Mar 15, 11:37*am, blake murphy > wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:26:59 -0600, Gregory Morrow wrote:
> > blake murphy wrote:
>
> >> On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:15:12 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
>
> >>> On Mar 13, 8:08 pm, "Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote:
> >>>> Bobo Bonobo® > news:da294994-58bd-4470-ab7b-
> >>>> : in rec.food.cooking
>
> >>>>> Yes, but many folks here on the NG, who ostensibly know how to cook
> >>>>> use that Kraft boxed crap. They turn it into their own unique semi-
> >>>>> homemade masterpieces, and then tell us all about it.
>
> >>>> I've never seen anything like you posted. Sure, lots of people use
> > canned
> >>>> soups in recipes but the recipes are simple, usually casserole type
> > things.
> >>>> This is a cooking group, not a gourmet group. Never have I seen anyone
> >>>> jazz up "Kraft boxed crap" and claim it was anything else.
>
> >>> There was a thread last week.
>
> >>> --Bryan
>
> >> yes, they're so dreary compared to your scintillating posts about onion
> >> farts and the fantasies on the torture and execution of trans-fat
> >> manufacturers.
>
> > Lol...and wasn't it Booboo that wrote that he fed crappy stuff to a
> > neighbor's dog so it'd die...???

Did I admit to actually have done it? I don't think so. I wrote,
"The time frame in which this did, or did not, take place was a matter
of weeks." Maybe it was just an hypothetical, and I was just
proposing a solution.

For reference's sake, here's a repost:
____
"If someone is taking their dog out to shit by the sidewalk and not
cleaning up after it, then taking the dog back inside where it will
spend all day until her or her boyfriend get home from work you can
take a 00 size gelatin capsule filled with Pure Cap (made by Garden
Row Foods http://www.firegirl.com/hs1154.html )
and take a small piece of steak to which you have made an incision
just right to completely enclose the capsule and insert the capsule.
Since dogs scarf small pieces of meat whole, it will be some time
before the capsule dissolves, but when it does extreme peristalsis
will occur, and when
the stuff reaches the large intestine, which has pain sensitive
nerves, the dog--no matter how much of a 'good dog' he or she is--will
not be
able to control its bowels. Add to that the fact that the dog's
asshole will also be burning like hell right after it shits, and you
know what that'll lead to, right? You guessed it, butthole surfing
across the carpets.
Yeah, all those times I had to walk past that stinking dogshit on my
way to catch the bus to school...It's fun to make the punishment fit
the crime. "
________________

>
> * * * * <snort>
>
> i had forgetten about that. *i think it wasn't that the dog would die, but
> instead go home and shit all over inside of the neighbor's house. *(that
> the dog would suffer was just a side benefit.)

Call it collateral damage. What if that exact thing could be caused
to happen with no discomfort suffered by the dog? Would you then
think it just?

And you are an asshole to accuse me of taking pleasure in the dog's
discomfort.
Anyone here who eats factory farmed pork is far more responsible for
animal cruelty than a person who carries out my scheme.

See:

__________________________________________________ _
Smithfield's pigs live by the hundreds or thousands in warehouse-like
barns, in rows of wall-to-wall pens. Sows are artificially inseminated
and fed and delivered of their piglets in cages so small they cannot
turn around. Forty fully grown 250-pound male hogs often occupy a pen
the size of a tiny apartment. They trample each other to death. There
is no sunlight, straw, fresh air or earth. The floors are slatted to
allow excrement to fall into a catchment pit under the pens, but many
things besides excrement can wind up in the pits: afterbirths, piglets
accidentally crushed by their mothers, old batteries, broken bottles
of insecticide, antibiotic syringes, stillborn pigs -- anything small
enough to fit through the foot-wide pipes that drain the pits. The
pipes remain closed until enough sewage accumulates in the pits to
create good expulsion pressure; then the pipes are opened and
everything bursts out into a large holding pond.

The temperature inside hog houses is often hotter than ninety degrees.
The air, saturated almost to the point of precipitation with gases
from shit and chemicals, can be lethal to the pigs. Enormous exhaust
fans run twenty-four hours a day. The ventilation systems function
like the ventilators of terminal patients: If they break down for any
length of time, pigs start dying.
source--
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...orst_polluters

__________________________________________________ __________________

> bobo thought that was the height of cleverness.

I still think it so. In the administration of justice, there are
usually innocents who suffer some degree of harm, however minor.
Enjoy your pork tenderloin, or at least ask the person whom you
directed to Giant to enjoy hers.

Hypocritical asshole.
>
> your pal,
> blake

--Bryan

On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:58:17 -0400, cybercat wrote:

> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
> news
>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:51:44 -0400, cybercat wrote:
>>
>>> "blake murphy" > wrote
>>>>> Nobody does crazy like Irish people do crazy.
>>>>
>>>> the odd thing was is that she didn't drink at all. that may have been
>>>> the
>>>> problem.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm thinking. My father's first wife was Irish. After he died she and I
>>> became fast friends. (I am a child of his second wife.)
>>
>> granny was pretty ****ing dour even before she lost her mind. (now that i
>> think of it, she might have been scottish-english.) but, to cut her some
>> slack, grandpa ran around on her, and the rest of the family (except for
>> my
>> father) treated her pretty shabbily when they separated (divorce was of
>> course out of the question.) she had to and did support herself with no
>> help from him, unusual for a woman of her generation.
>>
> My half sisters, (the ones with the Irish mother) are comically melancholy.
> I have begun to think of Irish people as the white people with soul. Or at
> least angst.

something.

your pal,
blake

On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:23:39 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:

> On Mar 15, 11:37*am, blake murphy > wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:26:59 -0600, Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>> blake murphy wrote:
>>
>>>> On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:15:12 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
>>
>>>>> On Mar 13, 8:08 pm, "Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote:
>>>>>> Bobo Bonobo® > news:da294994-58bd-4470-ab7b-
>>>>>> : in rec.food.cooking
>>
>>>>>>> Yes, but many folks here on the NG, who ostensibly know how to cook
>>>>>>> use that Kraft boxed crap. They turn it into their own unique semi-
>>>>>>> homemade masterpieces, and then tell us all about it.
>>
>>>>>> I've never seen anything like you posted. Sure, lots of people use
>>> canned
>>>>>> soups in recipes but the recipes are simple, usually casserole type
>>> things.
>>>>>> This is a cooking group, not a gourmet group. Never have I seen anyone
>>>>>> jazz up "Kraft boxed crap" and claim it was anything else.
>>
>>>>> There was a thread last week.
>>
>>>>> --Bryan
>>
>>>> yes, they're so dreary compared to your scintillating posts about onion
>>>> farts and the fantasies on the torture and execution of trans-fat
>>>> manufacturers.
>>
>>> Lol...and wasn't it Booboo that wrote that he fed crappy stuff to a
>>> neighbor's dog so it'd die...???
>
> Did I admit to actually have done it? I don't think so. I wrote,
> "The time frame in which this did, or did not, take place was a matter
> of weeks." Maybe it was just an hypothetical, and I was just
> proposing a solution.
>

yes, very clever to present this 'hypothetical' case.

> For reference's sake, here's a repost:

<snip reprise of awesum cleverness>
>>
>> * * * * <snort>
>>
>> i had forgetten about that. *i think it wasn't that the dog would die, but
>> instead go home and shit all over inside of the neighbor's house. *(that
>> the dog would suffer was just a side benefit.)
>
> Call it collateral damage. What if that exact thing could be caused
> to happen with no discomfort suffered by the dog? Would you then
> think it just?
>

no i wouldn't. that's why you are an asshole and i am not. in any case,
the dog most certainly *did* suffer discomfort, all for your demented
pleasure.

> And you are an asshole to accuse me of taking pleasure in the dog's
> discomfort.
> Anyone here who eats factory farmed pork is far more responsible for
> animal cruelty than a person who carries out my scheme.
>
> See:
>
<snip bleat about meanness on part of pork producers, which *must* have
something to do with the subject at hand, though i sure can't see what it
is>
>
>> bobo thought that was the height of cleverness.
>
> I still think it so. In the administration of justice, there are
> usually innocents who suffer some degree of harm, however minor.

who decided to make your nutty ass the administrator of justice? what if i
decided it would be a good idea to give you a dose of something that caused
your to shit all over your house?

> Enjoy your pork tenderloin, or at least ask the person whom you
> directed to Giant to enjoy hers.
>
> Hypocritical asshole.
>>

you are unusually stupid, bobo, if you think the above constitutes
something of a defense. but we knew that already.

blake

"blake murphy" > wrote
>> My half sisters, (the ones with the Irish mother) are comically
>> melancholy.
>> I have begun to think of Irish people as the white people with soul. Or
>> at
>> least angst.
>
> something.
>

There was a kickass Irish band on Ferguson last night. At first they seemed
silly ... then they picked up steam and in the end it was like YEAH!

On Mar 18, 11:16*am, blake murphy > wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:23:39 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
> > On Mar 15, 11:37*am, blake murphy > wrote:
> >> On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:26:59 -0600, Gregory Morrow wrote:
> >>> blake murphy wrote:
>
> >>>> On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:15:12 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Mar 13, 8:08 pm, "Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote:
> >>>>>> Bobo Bonobo® > news:da294994-58bd-4470-ab7b-
> >>>>>> : in rec.food.cooking
>
> >>>>>>> Yes, but many folks here on the NG, who ostensibly know how to cook
> >>>>>>> use that Kraft boxed crap. They turn it into their own unique semi-
> >>>>>>> homemade masterpieces, and then tell us all about it.
>
> >>>>>> I've never seen anything like you posted. Sure, lots of people use
> >>> canned
> >>>>>> soups in recipes but the recipes are simple, usually casserole type
> >>> things.
> >>>>>> This is a cooking group, not a gourmet group. Never have I seen anyone
> >>>>>> jazz up "Kraft boxed crap" and claim it was anything else.
>
> >>>>> There was a thread last week.
>
> >>>>> --Bryan
>
> >>>> yes, they're so dreary compared to your scintillating posts about onion
> >>>> farts and the fantasies on the torture and execution of trans-fat
> >>>> manufacturers.
>
> >>> Lol...and wasn't it Booboo that wrote that he fed crappy stuff to a
> >>> neighbor's dog so it'd die...???
>
> > Did I admit to actually have done it? *I don't think so. *I wrote,
> > "The time frame in which this did, or did not, take place was a matter
> > of weeks." *Maybe it was just an hypothetical, and I was just
> > proposing a solution.
>
> yes, very clever to present this 'hypothetical' case.
>
> > For reference's sake, here's a repost:
>
> * * * * <snip reprise of awesum cleverness>
>
>
>
> >> * * * * <snort>
>
> >> i had forgetten about that. *i think it wasn't that the dog would die, but
> >> instead go home and shit all over inside of the neighbor's house. *(that
> >> the dog would suffer was just a side benefit.)
>
> > Call it collateral damage. *What if that exact thing could be caused
> > to happen with no discomfort suffered by the dog? *Would you then
> > think it just?
>
> no i wouldn't. *that's why you are an asshole and i am not. *in any case,
> the dog most certainly *did* suffer discomfort, all for your demented
> pleasure.

Imagining that woman and her boyfriend, who might or might not be
hypothetical cleaning stinking shit from their carpet.? A dose of
their own stench? How could one take pleasure in that?
>
> > And you are an asshole to accuse me of taking pleasure in the dog's
> > discomfort.
> > Anyone here who eats factory farmed pork is far more responsible for
> > animal cruelty than a person who carries out my scheme.
>
> > See:
>
> * * * * <snip bleat about meanness on part of pork producers, which *must* have
> something to do with the subject at hand, though i sure can't see what it
> is>

Because you have a weak mind.
>
>
>
> >> *bobo thought that was the height of cleverness.
>
> > I still think it so. *In the administration of justice, there are
> > usually innocents who suffer some degree of harm, however minor.
>
> who decided to make your nutty ass the administrator of justice? *

I was the one who felt wronged. I don't need you, or anyone else's
permission for anything.

> what if i decided it would be a good idea to give you a
> dose of something that caused your to shit all over your house?

So now you advocate retribution? What if I left a steaming pile of
shit next to your sidewalk every day? Two steaming piles, actually.
There were two dogs.
Maybe you like dog shit.
>
> > Enjoy your pork tenderloin, or at least ask the person whom you
> > directed to Giant to enjoy hers.
>
> > Hypocritical asshole.
>
> you are unusually stupid, bobo, if you think the above constitutes
> something of a defense. *but we knew that already.

Of course, a lifetime of suffering of a pig is nothing to compared to
a dog's afternoon of crampy diarrhea.

You sidestepped every argument. Wise, because you're of weak
intellect.
>
> blake

--Bryan

blake murphy wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:23:39 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
>
> > On Mar 15, 11:37 am, blake murphy > wrote:
> >> On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:26:59 -0600, Gregory Morrow wrote:
> >>> blake murphy wrote:
> >>
> >>>> On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:15:12 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
> >>
> >>>>> On Mar 13, 8:08 pm, "Michael \"Dog3\"" >
wrote:
> >>>>>> Bobo Bonobo® > news:da294994-58bd-4470-ab7b-
> >>>>>> : in rec.food.cooking
> >>
> >>>>>>> Yes, but many folks here on the NG, who ostensibly know how to
cook
> >>>>>>> use that Kraft boxed crap. They turn it into their own unique
semi-
> >>>>>>> homemade masterpieces, and then tell us all about it.
> >>
> >>>>>> I've never seen anything like you posted. Sure, lots of people use
> >>> canned
> >>>>>> soups in recipes but the recipes are simple, usually casserole type
> >>> things.
> >>>>>> This is a cooking group, not a gourmet group. Never have I seen
anyone
> >>>>>> jazz up "Kraft boxed crap" and claim it was anything else.
> >>
> >>>>> There was a thread last week.
> >>
> >>>>> --Bryan
> >>
> >>>> yes, they're so dreary compared to your scintillating posts about
onion
> >>>> farts and the fantasies on the torture and execution of trans-fat
> >>>> manufacturers.
> >>
> >>> Lol...and wasn't it Booboo that wrote that he fed crappy stuff to a
> >>> neighbor's dog so it'd die...???
> >
> > Did I admit to actually have done it? I don't think so. I wrote,
> > "The time frame in which this did, or did not, take place was a matter
> > of weeks." Maybe it was just an hypothetical, and I was just
> > proposing a solution.
> >
>
> yes, very clever to present this 'hypothetical' case.
>
> > For reference's sake, here's a repost:
>
> <snip reprise of awesum cleverness>
> >>
> >> <snort>
> >>
> >> i had forgetten about that. i think it wasn't that the dog would die,
but
> >> instead go home and shit all over inside of the neighbor's house. (that
> >> the dog would suffer was just a side benefit.)
> >
> > Call it collateral damage. What if that exact thing could be caused
> > to happen with no discomfort suffered by the dog? Would you then
> > think it just?
> >
>
> no i wouldn't. that's why you are an asshole and i am not. in any case,
> the dog most certainly *did* suffer discomfort, all for your demented
> pleasure.
>
> > And you are an asshole to accuse me of taking pleasure in the dog's
> > discomfort.
> > Anyone here who eats factory farmed pork is far more responsible for
> > animal cruelty than a person who carries out my scheme.
> >
> > See:
> >
> <snip bleat about meanness on part of pork producers, which *must* have
> something to do with the subject at hand, though i sure can't see what it
> is>
> >
> >> bobo thought that was the height of cleverness.
> >
> > I still think it so. In the administration of justice, there are
> > usually innocents who suffer some degree of harm, however minor.
>
> who decided to make your nutty ass the administrator of justice? what if
i
> decided it would be a good idea to give you a dose of something that
caused
> your to shit all over your house?
>
> > Enjoy your pork tenderloin, or at least ask the person whom you
> > directed to Giant to enjoy hers.
> >
> > Hypocritical asshole.
> >>
>
> you are unusually stupid, bobo, if you think the above constitutes
> something of a defense. but we knew that already.

[could not snip a word of hilarious interchange...]

Gads, I knew Booboo was a nut, but the "farmed pork" thang is a new one on
me...


--
Best
Greg

On Mar 18, 5:04*pm, "Gregory Morrow" > wrote:
> blake murphy wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:23:39 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 15, 11:37 am, blake murphy > wrote:
> > >> On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:26:59 -0600, Gregory Morrow wrote:
> > >>> blake murphy wrote:
>
> > >>>> On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:15:12 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
>
> > >>>>> On Mar 13, 8:08 pm, "Michael \"Dog3\"" >
> wrote:
> > >>>>>> Bobo Bonobo® > news:da294994-58bd-4470-ab7b-
> > >>>>>> : in rec.food.cooking
>
> > >>>>>>> Yes, but many folks here on the NG, who ostensibly know how to
> cook
> > >>>>>>> use that Kraft boxed crap. They turn it into their own unique
> semi-
> > >>>>>>> homemade masterpieces, and then tell us all about it.
>
> > >>>>>> I've never seen anything like you posted. Sure, lots of people use
> > >>> canned
> > >>>>>> soups in recipes but the recipes are simple, usually casserole type
> > >>> things.
> > >>>>>> This is a cooking group, not a gourmet group. Never have I seen
> anyone
> > >>>>>> jazz up "Kraft boxed crap" and claim it was anything else.
>
> > >>>>> There was a thread last week.
>
> > >>>>> --Bryan
>
> > >>>> yes, they're so dreary compared to your scintillating posts about
> onion
> > >>>> farts and the fantasies on the torture and execution of trans-fat
> > >>>> manufacturers.
>
> > >>> Lol...and wasn't it Booboo that wrote that he fed crappy stuff to a
> > >>> neighbor's dog so it'd die...???
>
> > > Did I admit to actually have done it? *I don't think so. *I wrote,
> > > "The time frame in which this did, or did not, take place was a matter
> > > of weeks." *Maybe it was just an hypothetical, and I was just
> > > proposing a solution.
>
> > yes, very clever to present this 'hypothetical' case.
>
> > > For reference's sake, here's a repost:
>
> > <snip reprise of awesum cleverness>
>
> > >> <snort>
>
> > >> i had forgetten about that. i think it wasn't that the dog would die,
> but
> > >> instead go home and shit all over inside of the neighbor's house. (that
> > >> the dog would suffer was just a side benefit.)
>
> > > Call it collateral damage. *What if that exact thing could be caused
> > > to happen with no discomfort suffered by the dog? *Would you then
> > > think it just?
>
> > no i wouldn't. *that's why you are an asshole and i am not. *in any case,
> > the dog most certainly *did* suffer discomfort, all for your demented
> > pleasure.
>
> > > And you are an asshole to accuse me of taking pleasure in the dog's
> > > discomfort.
> > > Anyone here who eats factory farmed pork is far more responsible for
> > > animal cruelty than a person who carries out my scheme.
>
> > > See:
>
> > <snip bleat about meanness on part of pork producers, which *must* have
> > something to do with the subject at hand, though i sure can't see what it
> > is>
>
> > >> *bobo thought that was the height of cleverness.
>
> > > I still think it so. *In the administration of justice, there are
> > > usually innocents who suffer some degree of harm, however minor.
>
> > who decided to make your nutty ass the administrator of justice? *what if
> i
> > decided it would be a good idea to give you a dose of something that
> caused
> > your to shit all over your house?
>
> > > Enjoy your pork tenderloin, or at least ask the person whom you
> > > directed to Giant to enjoy hers.
>
> > > Hypocritical asshole.
>
> > you are unusually stupid, bobo, if you think the above constitutes
> > something of a defense. *but we knew that already.
>
> [could not snip a word of hilarious interchange...]
>
> Gads, I knew Booboo was a nut, but the "farmed pork" thang is a new one on
> me...

It really is an awfully cruel thing. I'm no PETA supporter. Heck, I
could slaughter an animal by hand and eat its still warm raw flesh,
but factory farming of pigs and to a lesser degree, beef cattle is
pretty creepy. Same with chickens and turkeys, but those are so
stupid that it's a bit less of an issue.
This is from the Humane Society:
http://video.hsus.org/?fr_chl=90b841...f1ca78829a9957

No one who patronizes factory farmed livestock has any leg to stand on
accusing my dog scheme of excessive cruelty.

If you didn't know about the "'farmed pork' thang," you do now. It
shouldn't surprise me that people have so much trouble applying logic
to ethics, when they have pretty much trouble applying it to other,
less emotional things. You may think I'm a nut, but I know how to
construct a logical argument, and that's something that most of my
internet detractors have no clue as to how to do.
>
> --
> Best
> Greg

--Bryan

On Mar 18, 5:04*pm, "Gregory Morrow" > wrote:
> blake murphy wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:23:39 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 15, 11:37 am, blake murphy > wrote:
> > >> On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:26:59 -0600, Gregory Morrow wrote:
> > >>> blake murphy wrote:
>
> > >>>> On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:15:12 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
>
> > >>>>> On Mar 13, 8:08 pm, "Michael \"Dog3\"" >
> wrote:
> > >>>>>> Bobo Bonobo® > news:da294994-58bd-4470-ab7b-
> > >>>>>> : in rec.food.cooking
>
> > >>>>>>> Yes, but many folks here on the NG, who ostensibly know how to
> cook
> > >>>>>>> use that Kraft boxed crap. They turn it into their own unique
> semi-
> > >>>>>>> homemade masterpieces, and then tell us all about it.
>
> > >>>>>> I've never seen anything like you posted. Sure, lots of people use
> > >>> canned
> > >>>>>> soups in recipes but the recipes are simple, usually casserole type
> > >>> things.
> > >>>>>> This is a cooking group, not a gourmet group. Never have I seen
> anyone
> > >>>>>> jazz up "Kraft boxed crap" and claim it was anything else.
>
> > >>>>> There was a thread last week.
>
> > >>>>> --Bryan
>
> > >>>> yes, they're so dreary compared to your scintillating posts about
> onion
> > >>>> farts and the fantasies on the torture and execution of trans-fat
> > >>>> manufacturers.
>
> > >>> Lol...and wasn't it Booboo that wrote that he fed crappy stuff to a
> > >>> neighbor's dog so it'd die...???
>
> > > Did I admit to actually have done it? *I don't think so. *I wrote,
> > > "The time frame in which this did, or did not, take place was a matter
> > > of weeks." *Maybe it was just an hypothetical, and I was just
> > > proposing a solution.
>
> > yes, very clever to present this 'hypothetical' case.
>
> > > For reference's sake, here's a repost:
>
> > <snip reprise of awesum cleverness>
>
> > >> <snort>
>
> > >> i had forgetten about that. i think it wasn't that the dog would die,
> but
> > >> instead go home and shit all over inside of the neighbor's house. (that
> > >> the dog would suffer was just a side benefit.)
>
> > > Call it collateral damage. *What if that exact thing could be caused
> > > to happen with no discomfort suffered by the dog? *Would you then
> > > think it just?
>
> > no i wouldn't. *that's why you are an asshole and i am not. *in any case,
> > the dog most certainly *did* suffer discomfort, all for your demented
> > pleasure.
>
> > > And you are an asshole to accuse me of taking pleasure in the dog's
> > > discomfort.
> > > Anyone here who eats factory farmed pork is far more responsible for
> > > animal cruelty than a person who carries out my scheme.
>
> > > See:
>
> > <snip bleat about meanness on part of pork producers, which *must* have
> > something to do with the subject at hand, though i sure can't see what it
> > is>
>
> > >> *bobo thought that was the height of cleverness.
>
> > > I still think it so. *In the administration of justice, there are
> > > usually innocents who suffer some degree of harm, however minor.
>
> > who decided to make your nutty ass the administrator of justice? *what if
> i
> > decided it would be a good idea to give you a dose of something that
> caused
> > your to shit all over your house?
>
> > > Enjoy your pork tenderloin, or at least ask the person whom you
> > > directed to Giant to enjoy hers.
>
> > > Hypocritical asshole.
>
> > you are unusually stupid, bobo, if you think the above constitutes
> > something of a defense. *but we knew that already.
>
> [could not snip a word of hilarious interchange...]
>
> Gads, I knew Booboo was a nut, but the "farmed pork" thang is a new one on
> me...

Hey, you know what I realized AFTER clicking send? The first girl I
ever got to, well, do stuff with was called Booboo. She lived next
door.
>

Something else I noted. You "could not snip a word of hilarious
interchange," but that post itself was snipped by an intellectual
coward buddy of yours who knew he couldn't answer point by point.
Does Blake perhaps do some of the pleasurable things to you that I did
to little Booboo?

> --
> Best
> Greg

--Bryan

On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:19:49 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:

> On Mar 18, 11:16*am, blake murphy > wrote:
>>
>> you are unusually stupid, bobo, if you think the above constitutes
>> something of a defense. *but we knew that already.
>
> Of course, a lifetime of suffering of a pig is nothing to compared to
> a dog's afternoon of crampy diarrhea.
>
> You sidestepped every argument. Wise, because you're of weak
> intellect.
>>
>> blake

yeah, i guess you cut me down to size with that mighty brain of yours.

blake

On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:24:51 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:

> On Mar 18, 5:04*pm, "Gregory Morrow" > wrote:
>> blake murphy wrote:
>>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:23:39 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
>>
>>> > On Mar 15, 11:37 am, blake murphy > wrote:
>>> >> On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:26:59 -0600, Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>> >>> blake murphy wrote:
>>
>>> >>>> On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:15:12 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
>>
>>> >>>>> On Mar 13, 8:08 pm, "Michael \"Dog3\"" >
>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>> Bobo Bonobo® > news:da294994-58bd-4470-ab7b-
>>> >>>>>> : in rec.food.cooking
>>
>>> >>>>>>> Yes, but many folks here on the NG, who ostensibly know how to
>> cook
>>> >>>>>>> use that Kraft boxed crap. They turn it into their own unique
>> semi-
>>> >>>>>>> homemade masterpieces, and then tell us all about it.
>>
>>> >>>>>> I've never seen anything like you posted. Sure, lots of people use
>>> >>> canned
>>> >>>>>> soups in recipes but the recipes are simple, usually casserole type
>>> >>> things.
>>> >>>>>> This is a cooking group, not a gourmet group. Never have I seen
>> anyone
>>> >>>>>> jazz up "Kraft boxed crap" and claim it was anything else.
>>
>>> >>>>> There was a thread last week.
>>
>>> >>>>> --Bryan
>>
>>> >>>> yes, they're so dreary compared to your scintillating posts about
>> onion
>>> >>>> farts and the fantasies on the torture and execution of trans-fat
>>> >>>> manufacturers.
>>
>>> >>> Lol...and wasn't it Booboo that wrote that he fed crappy stuff to a
>>> >>> neighbor's dog so it'd die...???
>>
>>> > Did I admit to actually have done it? *I don't think so. *I wrote,
>>> > "The time frame in which this did, or did not, take place was a matter
>>> > of weeks." *Maybe it was just an hypothetical, and I was just
>>> > proposing a solution.
>>
>>> yes, very clever to present this 'hypothetical' case.
>>
>>> > For reference's sake, here's a repost:
>>
>>> <snip reprise of awesum cleverness>
>>
>>> >> <snort>
>>
>>> >> i had forgetten about that. i think it wasn't that the dog would die,
>> but
>>> >> instead go home and shit all over inside of the neighbor's house. (that
>>> >> the dog would suffer was just a side benefit.)
>>
>>> > Call it collateral damage. *What if that exact thing could be caused
>>> > to happen with no discomfort suffered by the dog? *Would you then
>>> > think it just?
>>
>>> no i wouldn't. *that's why you are an asshole and i am not. *in any case,
>>> the dog most certainly *did* suffer discomfort, all for your demented
>>> pleasure.
>>
>>> > And you are an asshole to accuse me of taking pleasure in the dog's
>>> > discomfort.
>>> > Anyone here who eats factory farmed pork is far more responsible for
>>> > animal cruelty than a person who carries out my scheme.
>>
>>> > See:
>>
>>> <snip bleat about meanness on part of pork producers, which *must* have
>>> something to do with the subject at hand, though i sure can't see what it
>>> is>
>>
>>> >> *bobo thought that was the height of cleverness.
>>
>>> > I still think it so. *In the administration of justice, there are
>>> > usually innocents who suffer some degree of harm, however minor.
>>
>>> who decided to make your nutty ass the administrator of justice? *what if
>> i
>>> decided it would be a good idea to give you a dose of something that
>> caused
>>> your to shit all over your house?
>>
>>> > Enjoy your pork tenderloin, or at least ask the person whom you
>>> > directed to Giant to enjoy hers.
>>
>>> > Hypocritical asshole.
>>
>>> you are unusually stupid, bobo, if you think the above constitutes
>>> something of a defense. *but we knew that already.
>>
>> [could not snip a word of hilarious interchange...]
>>
>> Gads, I knew Booboo was a nut, but the "farmed pork" thang is a new one on
>> me...
>
> It really is an awfully cruel thing. I'm no PETA supporter. Heck, I
> could slaughter an animal by hand and eat its still warm raw flesh,
> but factory farming of pigs and to a lesser degree, beef cattle is
> pretty creepy. Same with chickens and turkeys, but those are so
> stupid that it's a bit less of an issue.
> This is from the Humane Society:
> http://video.hsus.org/?fr_chl=90b841...f1ca78829a9957
>
> No one who patronizes factory farmed livestock has any leg to stand on
> accusing my dog scheme of excessive cruelty.
>
> If you didn't know about the "'farmed pork' thang," you do now. It
> shouldn't surprise me that people have so much trouble applying logic
> to ethics, when they have pretty much trouble applying it to other,
> less emotional things. You may think I'm a nut, but I know how to
> construct a logical argument, and that's something that most of my
> internet detractors have no clue as to how to do.
>>
>> --

see, here's the thing, bobo. if you like to eat pork, well, that's the way
it goes. there's not much of an alternative.

if, on the other hand, if you're ****ed off at your neighbors, there are
many ways to deal with that other than being a passive-aggressive pussy and
poisoning their dog. can you wrap your mega-brain around that?

blake

On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:41:18 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:

> On Mar 18, 5:04*pm, "Gregory Morrow" > wrote:
>> blake murphy wrote:
>>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:23:39 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
>>
>>> > On Mar 15, 11:37 am, blake murphy > wrote:
>>> >> On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:26:59 -0600, Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>> >>> blake murphy wrote:
>>
>>> >>>> On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:15:12 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
>>
>>> >>>>> On Mar 13, 8:08 pm, "Michael \"Dog3\"" >
>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>> Bobo Bonobo® > news:da294994-58bd-4470-ab7b-
>>> >>>>>> : in rec.food.cooking
>>
>>> >>>>>>> Yes, but many folks here on the NG, who ostensibly know how to
>> cook
>>> >>>>>>> use that Kraft boxed crap. They turn it into their own unique
>> semi-
>>> >>>>>>> homemade masterpieces, and then tell us all about it.
>>
>>> >>>>>> I've never seen anything like you posted. Sure, lots of people use
>>> >>> canned
>>> >>>>>> soups in recipes but the recipes are simple, usually casserole type
>>> >>> things.
>>> >>>>>> This is a cooking group, not a gourmet group. Never have I seen
>> anyone
>>> >>>>>> jazz up "Kraft boxed crap" and claim it was anything else.
>>
>>> >>>>> There was a thread last week.
>>
>>> >>>>> --Bryan
>>
>>> >>>> yes, they're so dreary compared to your scintillating posts about
>> onion
>>> >>>> farts and the fantasies on the torture and execution of trans-fat
>>> >>>> manufacturers.
>>
>>> >>> Lol...and wasn't it Booboo that wrote that he fed crappy stuff to a
>>> >>> neighbor's dog so it'd die...???
>>
>>> > Did I admit to actually have done it? *I don't think so. *I wrote,
>>> > "The time frame in which this did, or did not, take place was a matter
>>> > of weeks." *Maybe it was just an hypothetical, and I was just
>>> > proposing a solution.
>>
>>> yes, very clever to present this 'hypothetical' case.
>>
>>> > For reference's sake, here's a repost:
>>
>>> <snip reprise of awesum cleverness>
>>
>>> >> <snort>
>>
>>> >> i had forgetten about that. i think it wasn't that the dog would die,
>> but
>>> >> instead go home and shit all over inside of the neighbor's house. (that
>>> >> the dog would suffer was just a side benefit.)
>>
>>> > Call it collateral damage. *What if that exact thing could be caused
>>> > to happen with no discomfort suffered by the dog? *Would you then
>>> > think it just?
>>
>>> no i wouldn't. *that's why you are an asshole and i am not. *in any case,
>>> the dog most certainly *did* suffer discomfort, all for your demented
>>> pleasure.
>>
>>> > And you are an asshole to accuse me of taking pleasure in the dog's
>>> > discomfort.
>>> > Anyone here who eats factory farmed pork is far more responsible for
>>> > animal cruelty than a person who carries out my scheme.
>>
>>> > See:
>>
>>> <snip bleat about meanness on part of pork producers, which *must* have
>>> something to do with the subject at hand, though i sure can't see what it
>>> is>
>>
>>> >> *bobo thought that was the height of cleverness.
>>
>>> > I still think it so. *In the administration of justice, there are
>>> > usually innocents who suffer some degree of harm, however minor.
>>
>>> who decided to make your nutty ass the administrator of justice? *what if
>> i
>>> decided it would be a good idea to give you a dose of something that
>> caused
>>> your to shit all over your house?
>>
>>> > Enjoy your pork tenderloin, or at least ask the person whom you
>>> > directed to Giant to enjoy hers.
>>
>>> > Hypocritical asshole.
>>
>>> you are unusually stupid, bobo, if you think the above constitutes
>>> something of a defense. *but we knew that already.
>>
>> [could not snip a word of hilarious interchange...]
>>
>> Gads, I knew Booboo was a nut, but the "farmed pork" thang is a new one on
>> me...
>
> Hey, you know what I realized AFTER clicking send? The first girl I
> ever got to, well, do stuff with was called Booboo. She lived next
> door.
>>
>
> Something else I noted. You "could not snip a word of hilarious
> interchange," but that post itself was snipped by an intellectual
> coward buddy of yours who knew he couldn't answer point by point.
> Does Blake perhaps do some of the pleasurable things to you that I did
> to little Booboo?
>

i answered your arguments, such as they were. you more than welcome to
imagine you came off better in the exchange, if you wish.

unfortunately, i don't have a dog to poison, so your usual methods are
unavailable to you.

blake

On Mar 19, 11:11*am, blake murphy > wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:19:49 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
> > On Mar 18, 11:16*am, blake murphy > wrote:
>
> >> you are unusually stupid, bobo, if you think the above constitutes
> >> something of a defense. *but we knew that already.
>
> > Of course, a lifetime of suffering of a pig is nothing to compared to
> > a dog's afternoon of crampy diarrhea.
>
> > You sidestepped every argument. *Wise, because you're of weak
> > intellect.
>
> >> blake
>
> yeah, i guess you cut me down to size with that mighty brain of yours.

No. I didn't. You ducked and ran.
>
> blake

--Bryan

blake murphy wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:24:51 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
>
> > On Mar 18, 5:04 pm, "Gregory Morrow" > wrote:
> >> blake murphy wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:23:39 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
> >>
> >>> > On Mar 15, 11:37 am, blake murphy >
wrote:
> >>> >> On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:26:59 -0600, Gregory Morrow wrote:
> >>> >>> blake murphy wrote:
> >>
> >>> >>>> On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:15:12 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
> >>
> >>> >>>>> On Mar 13, 8:08 pm, "Michael \"Dog3\"" >
> >> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>> Bobo Bonobo® > news:da294994-58bd-4470-ab7b-
> >>> >>>>>> : in rec.food.cooking
> >>
> >>> >>>>>>> Yes, but many folks here on the NG, who ostensibly know how to
> >> cook
> >>> >>>>>>> use that Kraft boxed crap. They turn it into their own unique
> >> semi-
> >>> >>>>>>> homemade masterpieces, and then tell us all about it.
> >>
> >>> >>>>>> I've never seen anything like you posted. Sure, lots of people
use
> >>> >>> canned
> >>> >>>>>> soups in recipes but the recipes are simple, usually casserole
type
> >>> >>> things.
> >>> >>>>>> This is a cooking group, not a gourmet group. Never have I seen
> >> anyone
> >>> >>>>>> jazz up "Kraft boxed crap" and claim it was anything else.
> >>
> >>> >>>>> There was a thread last week.
> >>
> >>> >>>>> --Bryan
> >>
> >>> >>>> yes, they're so dreary compared to your scintillating posts about
> >> onion
> >>> >>>> farts and the fantasies on the torture and execution of trans-fat
> >>> >>>> manufacturers.
> >>
> >>> >>> Lol...and wasn't it Booboo that wrote that he fed crappy stuff to
a
> >>> >>> neighbor's dog so it'd die...???
> >>
> >>> > Did I admit to actually have done it? I don't think so. I wrote,
> >>> > "The time frame in which this did, or did not, take place was a
matter
> >>> > of weeks." Maybe it was just an hypothetical, and I was just
> >>> > proposing a solution.
> >>
> >>> yes, very clever to present this 'hypothetical' case.
> >>
> >>> > For reference's sake, here's a repost:
> >>
> >>> <snip reprise of awesum cleverness>
> >>
> >>> >> <snort>
> >>
> >>> >> i had forgetten about that. i think it wasn't that the dog would
die,
> >> but
> >>> >> instead go home and shit all over inside of the neighbor's house.
(that
> >>> >> the dog would suffer was just a side benefit.)
> >>
> >>> > Call it collateral damage. What if that exact thing could be caused
> >>> > to happen with no discomfort suffered by the dog? Would you then
> >>> > think it just?
> >>
> >>> no i wouldn't. that's why you are an asshole and i am not. in any
case,
> >>> the dog most certainly *did* suffer discomfort, all for your demented
> >>> pleasure.
> >>
> >>> > And you are an asshole to accuse me of taking pleasure in the dog's
> >>> > discomfort.
> >>> > Anyone here who eats factory farmed pork is far more responsible for
> >>> > animal cruelty than a person who carries out my scheme.
> >>
> >>> > See:
> >>
> >>> <snip bleat about meanness on part of pork producers, which *must*
have
> >>> something to do with the subject at hand, though i sure can't see what
it
> >>> is>
> >>
> >>> >> bobo thought that was the height of cleverness.
> >>
> >>> > I still think it so. In the administration of justice, there are
> >>> > usually innocents who suffer some degree of harm, however minor.
> >>
> >>> who decided to make your nutty ass the administrator of justice? what
if
> >> i
> >>> decided it would be a good idea to give you a dose of something that
> >> caused
> >>> your to shit all over your house?
> >>
> >>> > Enjoy your pork tenderloin, or at least ask the person whom you
> >>> > directed to Giant to enjoy hers.
> >>
> >>> > Hypocritical asshole.
> >>
> >>> you are unusually stupid, bobo, if you think the above constitutes
> >>> something of a defense. but we knew that already.
> >>
> >> [could not snip a word of hilarious interchange...]
> >>
> >> Gads, I knew Booboo was a nut, but the "farmed pork" thang is a new one
on
> >> me...
> >
> > It really is an awfully cruel thing. I'm no PETA supporter. Heck, I
> > could slaughter an animal by hand and eat its still warm raw flesh,
> > but factory farming of pigs and to a lesser degree, beef cattle is
> > pretty creepy. Same with chickens and turkeys, but those are so
> > stupid that it's a bit less of an issue.
> > This is from the Humane Society:
> > http://video.hsus.org/?fr_chl=90b841...f1ca78829a9957
> >
> > No one who patronizes factory farmed livestock has any leg to stand on
> > accusing my dog scheme of excessive cruelty.
> >
> > If you didn't know about the "'farmed pork' thang," you do now. It
> > shouldn't surprise me that people have so much trouble applying logic
> > to ethics, when they have pretty much trouble applying it to other,
> > less emotional things. You may think I'm a nut, but I know how to
> > construct a logical argument, and that's something that most of my
> > internet detractors have no clue as to how to do.
> >>
> >> --
>
> see, here's the thing, bobo. if you like to eat pork, well, that's the
way
> it goes. there's not much of an alternative.
>
> if, on the other hand, if you're ****ed off at your neighbors, there are
> many ways to deal with that other than being a passive-aggressive pussy
and
> poisoning their dog. can you wrap your mega-brain around that?
>


Gotta luv the "my internet detractors" part, lol...

I'm pretty close to issuing an all - points "k00k alert" for Booboo...the
primary trait of a Usenet k00k is obliviousness, and he surely fits the
bill.


--
Best
Greg

blake murphy wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:19:49 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
>
> > On Mar 18, 11:16 am, blake murphy > wrote:
> >>
> >> you are unusually stupid, bobo, if you think the above constitutes
> >> something of a defense. but we knew that already.
> >
> > Of course, a lifetime of suffering of a pig is nothing to compared to
> > a dog's afternoon of crampy diarrhea.
> >
> > You sidestepped every argument. Wise, because you're of weak
> > intellect.
> >>
> >> blake
>
> yeah, i guess you cut me down to size with that mighty brain of yours.
>


Since I have the Booboo's nonsense krap-filed, I'm so very glad to
vicariously experience his idiocy filtered through your replies, blake...

:-)

I wonder if he's still on the local skool lunch committee...???


--
Best
Greg

On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:25:24 -0600, "Gregory Morrow" >
wrote:

>Since I have the Booboo's nonsense krap-filed, I'm so very glad to
>vicariously experience his idiocy filtered through your replies, blake...
>
>:-)
>
>I wonder if he's still on the local skool lunch committee...???

That was a low blow and uncalled for - no matter how despicable you
think he is. What do you do for your children's school? Parent
volunteers are (almost) always appreciated.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

In article >,
sf > wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:25:24 -0600, "Gregory Morrow" >
> wrote:
>
> >Since I have the Booboo's nonsense krap-filed, I'm so very glad to
> >vicariously experience his idiocy filtered through your replies, blake...
> >
> >:-)
> >
> >I wonder if he's still on the local skool lunch committee...???
>
> That was a low blow and uncalled for - no matter how despicable you
> think he is. What do you do for your children's school? Parent
> volunteers are (almost) always appreciated.

Almost. Someone who's sole contribution is threats to kill people would
not be appreciated.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

On Mar 19, 10:54*pm, Dan Abel > wrote:
> In article >,
> *sf > wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:25:24 -0600, "Gregory Morrow" >
> > wrote:
>
> > >Since I have the Booboo's nonsense krap-filed, I'm so very glad to
> > >vicariously experience his idiocy filtered through your replies, blake....
>
> > >:-)
>
> > >I wonder if he's still on the local skool lunch committee...???
>
> > That was a low blow and uncalled for - no matter how despicable you
> > think he is. *What do you do for your children's school? *Parent
> > volunteers are (almost) always appreciated.

What Mr. Morrow must be referring to is my leading the fathers'
pancake breakfast fundraiser at my son's former school, and you're
right. Even if a person finds me totally repugnant, it should not be
for that reason, and if anything that should mitigate my status as
villain. I don't bring up my other volunteer stuff on this NG
because they don't involve cooking, and I'm not seeking redemption for
my sometimes offensive, over-the-top posts, but in the wash I'm
actually pretty prosocial.
>
> Almost. *Someone who's sole contribution is threats to kill people would
> not be appreciated.

Very true. The other day at work, someone said that having smoke
coming out of the cigarette extinguisher thingie (a modern tech
ashtray) outside the door was as bad as anything could be, as a reason
that we should immediately put a stop to the smoke. I replied that
there are all kinds of things that would be worse. That was a
rhetorical silly guffaw comment, but someone actually asked me, "Like
what?" I searched my mind and said, "A dead sheep. What if there
were a dead sheep lying there in front of the doors?" The new young
receptionist said, "Ewwww!" The other co-workers were unphased. But,
as so often, I digress. Your point was that "(almost) always
appreciated was just that, "almost."

>
> --
> Dan Abel
> Petaluma, California USA
>

--Bryan

On Mar 13, 9:32*pm, "Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote:
> "brooklyn1" @nwr ddc02.gnilink.net:in rec.food.cooking
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> Bobo Bonobo® > *news:da294994-58bd-4470-ab7b-
> >> : in rec.food.cooking
>
> >>> Yes, but many folks here on the NG, who ostensibly know how to cook
> >>> use that Kraft boxed crap. *They turn it into their own unique semi-
> >>> homemade masterpieces, and then tell us all about it.
>
> >> I've never seen anything like you posted. Sure, lots of people use
> >> canned soups in recipes but the recipes are simple, usually casserole
> >> type things.
> >> This is a cooking group, not a gourmet group. *Never have I seen
> >> anyone jazz up "Kraft boxed crap" and claim it was anything else.
>
> >> Michael
>
> > Yeah, but... many have called Kraft Mac 'n Cheese caserole gourmet
> > cooking because they added <drum roll> shrimpsss. hehe
>
> Shrimp? *That sounds pretty nasty. *I do eat the old blue box of Kraft
> but I eat it as a snack. *From the old college days. *I loved it and
> ramen. Still do. *So sue me ;-)

But see? you recognize it as such. It's food slumming, and it
connects you to a former time. That's quite different from telling
folks that Kraft Dinner, or ramen, or whatever that the stuff is
great, and they should try it.
>
> Michael
>
--Bryan

Bryan wrote:

>>> I wonder if he's still on the local skool lunch committee...???
>
>> That was a low blow and uncalled for - no matter how despicable you
>> think he is. What do you do for your children's school? Parent
>> volunteers are (almost) always appreciated.
>
> What Mr. Morrow must be referring to is my leading the fathers' pancake
> breakfast fundraiser at my son's former school, and you're right. Even if
> a person finds me totally repugnant, it should not be for that reason, and
> if anything that should mitigate my status as villain.

Am I the only one who understands innuendo? Greg's implication was that
Bryan is of low moral character, and therefore should not be anywhere near
schoolchildren. He didn't say Bryan was of low moral character BECAUSE of
his involvement. And since Bryan mentioned that it was his son's FORMER
school, Greg's question has been answered.

Bob

On Mar 20, 12:39*am, "Bob Terwilliger" >
wrote:
> Bryan wrote:
> >>> I wonder if he's still on the local skool lunch committee...???
>
> >> That was a low blow and uncalled for - no matter how despicable you
> >> think he is. What do you do for your children's school? Parent
> >> volunteers are (almost) always appreciated.
>
> > What Mr. Morrow must be referring to is my leading the fathers' pancake
> > breakfast fundraiser at my son's former school, and you're right. *Even if
> > a person finds me totally repugnant, it should not be for that reason, and
> > if anything that should mitigate my status as villain.
>
> Am I the only one who understands innuendo? Greg's implication was that
> Bryan is of low moral character, and therefore should not be anywhere near
> schoolchildren. He didn't say Bryan was of low moral character BECAUSE of
> his involvement. And since Bryan mentioned that it was his son's FORMER
> school, Greg's question has been answered.

We moved, Bob. You base my "moral character" on my difference in
values from your own. Does this all boil down to my admission that I
appreciate the feeling of revenge? What is *justice* but an extension
of an-eye-for-an-eye, anyway? I used the word, "former," because I
carefully respect accuracy. You, on the other hand, make unwarranted
assumptions. It's not children whom I threaten, it's oldsters like
you.
We moved to a different school district for economic reasons, OK?
>
> Bob

--Bryan

Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> Bryan wrote:
>
> >>> I wonder if he's still on the local skool lunch committee...???
> >
> >> That was a low blow and uncalled for - no matter how despicable you
> >> think he is. What do you do for your children's school? Parent
> >> volunteers are (almost) always appreciated.
> >
> > What Mr. Morrow must be referring to is my leading the fathers' pancake
> > breakfast fundraiser at my son's former school, and you're right. Even
if
> > a person finds me totally repugnant, it should not be for that reason,
and
> > if anything that should mitigate my status as villain.
>
> Am I the only one who understands innuendo? Greg's implication was that
> Bryan is of low moral character, and therefore should not be anywhere near
> schoolchildren. He didn't say Bryan was of low moral character BECAUSE of
> his involvement. And since Bryan mentioned that it was his son's FORMER
> school, Greg's question has been answered.


:-)

I wonder if Booboo will teach his son to give those pesky neighbor dogs
poisoned pancakes...


--
Best
Greg

Bryan wrote:

>>>>> I wonder if he's still on the local skool lunch committee...???
>
>>>> That was a low blow and uncalled for - no matter how despicable you
>>>> think he is. What do you do for your children's school? Parent
>>>> volunteers are (almost) always appreciated.
>
>>> What Mr. Morrow must be referring to is my leading the fathers' pancake
>>> breakfast fundraiser at my son's former school, and you're right. Even
>>> if a person finds me totally repugnant, it should not be for that
>>> reason, and if anything that should mitigate my status as villain.
>
>> Am I the only one who understands innuendo? Greg's implication was that
>> Bryan is of low moral character, and therefore should not be anywhere
>> near schoolchildren. He didn't say Bryan was of low moral character
>> BECAUSE of his involvement. And since Bryan mentioned that it was his
>> son's FORMER school, Greg's question has been answered.
>
> We moved, Bob. You base my "moral character" on my difference in values
> from your own.

What part of the passage above indicates how *I* evaluate your moral
character? I merely translated Greg's post so that comprehension-impaired
people could understand it more readily, because obviously neither you nor
sf understood what Greg wrote. I don't know anything about your moral
character, but you have just revealed something about your IQ.


> Does this all boil down to my admission that I appreciate the feeling of
> revenge? What is *justice* but an extension of an-eye-for-an-eye, anyway?
> I used the word, "former," because I carefully respect accuracy. You, on
> the other hand, make unwarranted assumptions.

My assumptions were that I understood what Greg wrote, and that you did not.
I'm pretty sure that the first assumption was warranted, because I have
excellent reading comprehension. I'm COMPLETELY sure that the second
assumption was warranted, because of your reply to sf, which indicated your
mistaken belief that Greg was implying some kind of moral turpitude on your
part because of your participation in the school's activities.

Your reaction indicates that my explanation of what Greg wrote went
completely over your head. Do you frequently get cause and effect confused?
Are you familiar with the phrase "post hoc ergo propter hoc" as a logical
fallacy, but a typical method of insinuation?


> It's not children whom I threaten, it's oldsters like you. We moved to a
> different school district for economic reasons, OK?

Er...yeah, fine. Somehow I feel completely unthreatened, but have it your
way.

Bob

On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:25:19 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:

> On Mar 19, 11:11*am, blake murphy > wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:19:49 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
>>> On Mar 18, 11:16*am, blake murphy > wrote:
>>
>>>> you are unusually stupid, bobo, if you think the above constitutes
>>>> something of a defense. *but we knew that already.
>>
>>> Of course, a lifetime of suffering of a pig is nothing to compared to
>>> a dog's afternoon of crampy diarrhea.
>>
>>> You sidestepped every argument. *Wise, because you're of weak
>>> intellect.
>>
>>>> blake
>>
>> yeah, i guess you cut me down to size with that mighty brain of yours.
>
> No. I didn't. You ducked and ran.
>>

it's not my problem if you don't know how to read.

blake

On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:28:18 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:

> On Mar 20, 12:39*am, "Bob Terwilliger" >
> wrote:
>> Bryan wrote:
>>>>> I wonder if he's still on the local skool lunch committee...???
>>
>>>> That was a low blow and uncalled for - no matter how despicable you
>>>> think he is. What do you do for your children's school? Parent
>>>> volunteers are (almost) always appreciated.
>>
>>> What Mr. Morrow must be referring to is my leading the fathers' pancake
>>> breakfast fundraiser at my son's former school, and you're right. *Even if
>>> a person finds me totally repugnant, it should not be for that reason, and
>>> if anything that should mitigate my status as villain.
>>
>> Am I the only one who understands innuendo? Greg's implication was that
>> Bryan is of low moral character, and therefore should not be anywhere near
>> schoolchildren. He didn't say Bryan was of low moral character BECAUSE of
>> his involvement. And since Bryan mentioned that it was his son's FORMER
>> school, Greg's question has been answered.
>
> We moved, Bob. You base my "moral character" on my difference in
> values from your own. Does this all boil down to my admission that I
> appreciate the feeling of revenge? What is *justice* but an extension
> of an-eye-for-an-eye, anyway?

wrong again, o mighty brain. the justice system was a *replacement* for
the personal extraction of 'an eye for an eye,' which people rightly came
to see as barbaric and stupid. one problem is that individuals tend to go
overboard, as you did with your schmuck neighbor and his poor dog.

you know, most people give up revenge and revenge fantasies when they put
aside childish things. maybe it will happen to you someday, but i have my
doubts.

blake

On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:32:26 -0600, Gregory Morrow wrote:

> Bob Terwilliger wrote:
>
>> Bryan wrote:
>>
>>>>> I wonder if he's still on the local skool lunch committee...???
>>>
>>>> That was a low blow and uncalled for - no matter how despicable you
>>>> think he is. What do you do for your children's school? Parent
>>>> volunteers are (almost) always appreciated.
>>>
>>> What Mr. Morrow must be referring to is my leading the fathers' pancake
>>> breakfast fundraiser at my son's former school, and you're right. Even
> if
>>> a person finds me totally repugnant, it should not be for that reason,
> and
>>> if anything that should mitigate my status as villain.
>>
>> Am I the only one who understands innuendo? Greg's implication was that
>> Bryan is of low moral character, and therefore should not be anywhere near
>> schoolchildren. He didn't say Bryan was of low moral character BECAUSE of
>> his involvement. And since Bryan mentioned that it was his son's FORMER
>> school, Greg's question has been answered.
>
> :-)
>
> I wonder if Booboo will teach his son to give those pesky neighbor dogs
> poisoned pancakes...

i was thinking he and his eight-year-old must get along like a house afire.

your pal,
blake

On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:35:16 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:

> On Mar 13, 9:32*pm, "Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote:
>> "brooklyn1" @nwr ddc02.gnilink.net:in rec.food.cooking
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> "Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message
. ..
>>>> Bobo Bonobo® > *news:da294994-58bd-4470-ab7b-
>>>> : in rec.food.cooking
>>
>>>>> Yes, but many folks here on the NG, who ostensibly know how to cook
>>>>> use that Kraft boxed crap. *They turn it into their own unique semi-
>>>>> homemade masterpieces, and then tell us all about it.
>>
>>>> I've never seen anything like you posted. Sure, lots of people use
>>>> canned soups in recipes but the recipes are simple, usually casserole
>>>> type things.
>>>> This is a cooking group, not a gourmet group. *Never have I seen
>>>> anyone jazz up "Kraft boxed crap" and claim it was anything else.
>>
>>>> Michael
>>
>>> Yeah, but... many have called Kraft Mac 'n Cheese caserole gourmet
>>> cooking because they added <drum roll> shrimpsss. hehe
>>
>> Shrimp? *That sounds pretty nasty. *I do eat the old blue box of Kraft
>> but I eat it as a snack. *From the old college days. *I loved it and
>> ramen. Still do. *So sue me ;-)
>
> But see? you recognize it as such. It's food slumming, and it
> connects you to a former time. That's quite different from telling
> folks that Kraft Dinner, or ramen, or whatever that the stuff is
> great, and they should try it.
>>

....which exactly zero people here have done. don't you have enough
neighbors to wreak vengeance on with making up shit?

blake

On Mar 20, 10:06*am, blake murphy > wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:32:26 -0600, Gregory Morrow wrote:
> > Bob Terwilliger wrote:
>
> >> Bryan wrote:
>
> >>>>> I wonder if he's still on the local skool lunch committee...???
>
> >>>> That was a low blow and uncalled for - no matter how despicable you
> >>>> think he is. What do you do for your children's school? Parent
> >>>> volunteers are (almost) always appreciated.
>
> >>> What Mr. Morrow must be referring to is my leading the fathers' pancake
> >>> breakfast fundraiser at my son's former school, and you're right. *Even
> > if
> >>> a person finds me totally repugnant, it should not be for that reason,
> > and
> >>> if anything that should mitigate my status as villain.
>
> >> Am I the only one who understands innuendo? Greg's implication was that
> >> Bryan is of low moral character, and therefore should not be anywhere near
> >> schoolchildren. He didn't say Bryan was of low moral character BECAUSE of
> >> his involvement. And since Bryan mentioned that it was his son's FORMER
> >> school, Greg's question has been answered.
>
> > :-)
>
> > I wonder if Booboo will teach his son to give those pesky neighbor dogs
> > poisoned pancakes...

See, you are still under the mistaken impression that my goal was to
hurt the dogs. It was to hurt the owners. Yes, "hurt," as in harm,
cause unhappiness, distress. It's about the joy of revenge. It's
about making the person who made me smell dog shit smell seven times
seven amounts of dog shit. If you think that that makes me someone of
low moral character, sobeit.
>
> i was thinking he and his eight-year-old must get along like a house afire.

He's seven, and quite pleased with me right now since I made French
toast for breakfast.
>
> your pal,
> blake

--Bryan

"Bobo Bonobo®" > wrote in message
I searched my mind and said, "A dead sheep. What if there
were a dead sheep lying there in front of the doors?" The new young
receptionist said, "Ewwww!" The other co-workers were unphased.


*************************************

Wouldn't that be "Ewe"?

On Mar 20, 1:51*pm, "Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote:
> "Bobo Bonobo®" > wrote in message
>
> I searched my mind and said, "A dead sheep. *What if there
> were a dead sheep lying there in front of the doors?" *The new young
> receptionist said, "Ewwww!" *The other co-workers were unphased.
>
> *************************************
>
> Wouldn't that be "Ewe"?

Damn. I missed that snappy comeback.

--Bryan

On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:01:29 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:

> On Mar 20, 10:06*am, blake murphy > wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:32:26 -0600, Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>> Bob Terwilliger wrote:
>>
>>>> Bryan wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> I wonder if he's still on the local skool lunch committee...???
>>
>>>>>> That was a low blow and uncalled for - no matter how despicable you
>>>>>> think he is. What do you do for your children's school? Parent
>>>>>> volunteers are (almost) always appreciated.
>>
>>>>> What Mr. Morrow must be referring to is my leading the fathers' pancake
>>>>> breakfast fundraiser at my son's former school, and you're right. *Even
>>> if
>>>>> a person finds me totally repugnant, it should not be for that reason,
>>> and
>>>>> if anything that should mitigate my status as villain.
>>
>>>> Am I the only one who understands innuendo? Greg's implication was that
>>>> Bryan is of low moral character, and therefore should not be anywhere near
>>>> schoolchildren. He didn't say Bryan was of low moral character BECAUSE of
>>>> his involvement. And since Bryan mentioned that it was his son's FORMER
>>>> school, Greg's question has been answered.
>>
>>> :-)
>>
>>> I wonder if Booboo will teach his son to give those pesky neighbor dogs
>>> poisoned pancakes...
>
> See, you are still under the mistaken impression that my goal was to
> hurt the dogs. It was to hurt the owners. Yes, "hurt," as in harm,
> cause unhappiness, distress. It's about the joy of revenge. It's
> about making the person who made me smell dog shit smell seven times
> seven amounts of dog shit. If you think that that makes me someone of
> low moral character, sobeit.

it makes me think that you're so immature that you're incapable of
developing any kind of 'moral character,' low or not.

the fact that you weren't out to harm the dog is just a side dish of
stupid.

blake

In article >,
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:

> Bryan wrote:
>
> >>> I wonder if he's still on the local skool lunch committee...???
> >
> >> That was a low blow and uncalled for - no matter how despicable you
> >> think he is. What do you do for your children's school? Parent
> >> volunteers are (almost) always appreciated.
> >
> > What Mr. Morrow must be referring to is my leading the fathers' pancake
> > breakfast fundraiser at my son's former school, and you're right. Even if
> > a person finds me totally repugnant, it should not be for that reason, and
> > if anything that should mitigate my status as villain.
>
> Am I the only one who understands innuendo?

I'd call it mind reading myself.

> Greg's implication was that
> Bryan is of low moral character, and therefore should not be anywhere near
> schoolchildren. He didn't say Bryan was of low moral character BECAUSE of
> his involvement. And since Bryan mentioned that it was his son's FORMER
> school, Greg's question has been answered.

I thought it was all about the transfats. Bryan has had quite the
reputation on this group for his one-track mind about the subject.
Damsel posted an old recipe for something, and it called for butter, and
then in parentheses afterwards, "or margarine". Bryan pronounced his
usual death sentence.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:54:11 -0700, Dan Abel wrote:

> In article >,
> "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:
>
>> Bryan wrote:
>>
>>>>> I wonder if he's still on the local skool lunch committee...???
>>>
>>>> That was a low blow and uncalled for - no matter how despicable you
>>>> think he is. What do you do for your children's school? Parent
>>>> volunteers are (almost) always appreciated.
>>>
>>> What Mr. Morrow must be referring to is my leading the fathers' pancake
>>> breakfast fundraiser at my son's former school, and you're right. Even if
>>> a person finds me totally repugnant, it should not be for that reason, and
>>> if anything that should mitigate my status as villain.
>>
>> Am I the only one who understands innuendo?
>
> I'd call it mind reading myself.
>
>> Greg's implication was that
>> Bryan is of low moral character, and therefore should not be anywhere near
>> schoolchildren. He didn't say Bryan was of low moral character BECAUSE of
>> his involvement. And since Bryan mentioned that it was his son's FORMER
>> school, Greg's question has been answered.
>
> I thought it was all about the transfats. Bryan has had quite the
> reputation on this group for his one-track mind about the subject.
> Damsel posted an old recipe for something, and it called for butter, and
> then in parentheses afterwards, "or margarine". Bryan pronounced his
> usual death sentence.

it's like dr. galvani and his frog legs. it's true that bobo may not
twitch after he's dead, but at this point i wouldn't bet against it.

your pal,
blake