On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:01:29 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:

> On Mar 20, 10:06*am, blake murphy > wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:32:26 -0600, Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>> Bob Terwilliger wrote:
>>
>>>> Bryan wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> I wonder if he's still on the local skool lunch committee...???
>>
>>>>>> That was a low blow and uncalled for - no matter how despicable you
>>>>>> think he is. What do you do for your children's school? Parent
>>>>>> volunteers are (almost) always appreciated.
>>
>>>>> What Mr. Morrow must be referring to is my leading the fathers' pancake
>>>>> breakfast fundraiser at my son's former school, and you're right. *Even
>>> if
>>>>> a person finds me totally repugnant, it should not be for that reason,
>>> and
>>>>> if anything that should mitigate my status as villain.
>>
>>>> Am I the only one who understands innuendo? Greg's implication was that
>>>> Bryan is of low moral character, and therefore should not be anywhere near
>>>> schoolchildren. He didn't say Bryan was of low moral character BECAUSE of
>>>> his involvement. And since Bryan mentioned that it was his son's FORMER
>>>> school, Greg's question has been answered.
>>
>>> :-)
>>
>>> I wonder if Booboo will teach his son to give those pesky neighbor dogs
>>> poisoned pancakes...
>
> See, you are still under the mistaken impression that my goal was to
> hurt the dogs. It was to hurt the owners. Yes, "hurt," as in harm,
> cause unhappiness, distress. It's about the joy of revenge. It's
> about making the person who made me smell dog shit smell seven times
> seven amounts of dog shit. If you think that that makes me someone of
> low moral character, sobeit.

it makes me think that you're so immature that you're incapable of
developing any kind of 'moral character,' low or not.

the fact that you weren't out to harm the dog is just a side dish of
stupid.

blake