Bryan wrote:

>>>>> I wonder if he's still on the local skool lunch committee...???
>
>>>> That was a low blow and uncalled for - no matter how despicable you
>>>> think he is. What do you do for your children's school? Parent
>>>> volunteers are (almost) always appreciated.
>
>>> What Mr. Morrow must be referring to is my leading the fathers' pancake
>>> breakfast fundraiser at my son's former school, and you're right. Even
>>> if a person finds me totally repugnant, it should not be for that
>>> reason, and if anything that should mitigate my status as villain.
>
>> Am I the only one who understands innuendo? Greg's implication was that
>> Bryan is of low moral character, and therefore should not be anywhere
>> near schoolchildren. He didn't say Bryan was of low moral character
>> BECAUSE of his involvement. And since Bryan mentioned that it was his
>> son's FORMER school, Greg's question has been answered.
>
> We moved, Bob. You base my "moral character" on my difference in values
> from your own.

What part of the passage above indicates how *I* evaluate your moral
character? I merely translated Greg's post so that comprehension-impaired
people could understand it more readily, because obviously neither you nor
sf understood what Greg wrote. I don't know anything about your moral
character, but you have just revealed something about your IQ.


> Does this all boil down to my admission that I appreciate the feeling of
> revenge? What is *justice* but an extension of an-eye-for-an-eye, anyway?
> I used the word, "former," because I carefully respect accuracy. You, on
> the other hand, make unwarranted assumptions.

My assumptions were that I understood what Greg wrote, and that you did not.
I'm pretty sure that the first assumption was warranted, because I have
excellent reading comprehension. I'm COMPLETELY sure that the second
assumption was warranted, because of your reply to sf, which indicated your
mistaken belief that Greg was implying some kind of moral turpitude on your
part because of your participation in the school's activities.

Your reaction indicates that my explanation of what Greg wrote went
completely over your head. Do you frequently get cause and effect confused?
Are you familiar with the phrase "post hoc ergo propter hoc" as a logical
fallacy, but a typical method of insinuation?


> It's not children whom I threaten, it's oldsters like you. We moved to a
> different school district for economic reasons, OK?

Er...yeah, fine. Somehow I feel completely unthreatened, but have it your
way.

Bob