Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Barbecue (alt.food.barbecue) Discuss barbecue and grilling--southern style "low and slow" smoking of ribs, shoulders and briskets, as well as direct heat grilling of everything from burgers to salmon to vegetables. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 4, 9:53*pm, "Theron" wrote:
"Brick" wrote in message ter.com... On *4-Oct-2009, "Theron" wrote: "Duwop" wrote in message .... On Oct 4, 3:19 pm, "Theron" wrote: I'm not aware That's painfully obvious Kent. I'm not quite sure what you're saying. However, there has not been a post on this NG that compares the cost of BTUs of different fuels we use when smoking or grilling. In the six years I've been here, you're the only one that ever thought it was relavant. Nobody that seriously cooks, gives a big rats AXXX about the btu/hr of fuel. Not even the commercial folks care. Brick (Youth is wasted on young people) I think when the fuel cost of smoking a pork shoulder is greater than the cost of the meat we should consider that important. You bet the commercial folks care about that. You call that thinking? And that have absolutely nothing to do with your original now does it? At least you're now admitting that your original question was not thought out at all and basically more of your attention seeking trolling. Thanks for the confirmation of continued asshattery. |
|
|||
![]()
Theron wrote:
I think when the fuel cost of smoking a pork shoulder is greater than the cost of the meat we should consider that important. Ed /feed OCD mode on You've got the numbers, tell me *when* that is going to occur and why I should care. Also, who's this we you seem to be speaking for- do they all live in Nick's Bozo bin with you? Brian |
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 14:29:31 -0700, "Theron"
wrote: Again, the BTU per pound of different brands of charcoals is not the same as indicated. I'm also assuming 10,000 BTU per hour, which is variable, based on cooking temp, and the size of the cooking unit. I've been unable to find anything about the ingredients of the Sam's Walmart charcoal, and the Trader Joe's charcoall is claimed to be 100% hardwood plus cornstarch to bind and lump is wood. cost weight/lb cost/lb btu/lb cost/10,000 BTU Comp to propane Cost/5 hrs Cost/10 hrs 20 lb Propane $20.00 20 $1.00 21000 $0.48 100.00% $2.38 $4.76 Sam's Choice $5.27 18 $0.29 9000 $0.33 68.31% $1.63 $3.25 Trader Joe's $6.95 18 $0.39 9000 $0.43 90.09% $2.15 $4.29 "Lump" Charcoal varies varies $0.55 9000 $0.61 128.33% $3.06 $6.11 You pick a number out of the air for charcoal Btu/hr, then assign a ridiculously high price to propane. All this in an effort to come up with a cost comparison for something that few, if any, in this group give a tinker's dam about. Why? What's your point? Before you started posting these attempts at fuel cost comparisons, the cost of fuel was the least of my considerations. It still is, if I had to use $20.00 worth of either charcoal or propane to turn $10.00 worth of pork shoulder into something my friends and family would thoroughly enjoy, so be it. Ross. |
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 5, 8:58*am, wrote:
Before you started posting these attempts at fuel cost comparisons, the cost of fuel was the least of my considerations. Shit, I figure I use about $7 of lump for a 6-8 hour cook. Now my cooker can hold anywhere from 10 to 100lbs of meat. That's up to me. What's the cost per hour per pound? This is so stupid it hurts. This is so stupid it must be Kent's. |
|
|||
![]()
what strikes me as odd about this discussion is that part of the point of
slow and low is to take an otherwise almost completely tough hunk of meat and render it edible... so what if you raise the price per pound to double, you get good eating for say $2.50 per pound instead of that $7.00 lb steak, what is so hard about comparing finished cost of a picnic roast to a cut of meat that will cost you more? Lee -- If you want to discuss top posting please email me privately, lets not clutter the news group, thanks***** .. -- Have a wonderful day "Theron" wrote in message ... "Brick" wrote in message ter.com... On 4-Oct-2009, "Theron" wrote: "Duwop" wrote in message ... On Oct 4, 3:19 pm, "Theron" wrote: I'm not aware That's painfully obvious Kent. I'm not quite sure what you're saying. However, there has not been a post on this NG that compares the cost of BTUs of different fuels we use when smoking or grilling. In the six years I've been here, you're the only one that ever thought it was relavant. Nobody that seriously cooks, gives a big rats AXXX about the btu/hr of fuel. Not even the commercial folks care. Brick (Youth is wasted on young people) I think when the fuel cost of smoking a pork shoulder is greater than the cost of the meat we should consider that important. You bet the commercial folks care about that. Ed |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Fuel Cost Comparisons once more | General Cooking | |||
Fuel Cost Comparisons once more | Barbecue | |||
Charcoal Propane Cost Comparisons | Barbecue | |||
Tea comparisons? | Tea | |||
Tea comparisons? | Tea |