Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Winemaking (rec.crafts.winemaking) Discussion of the process, recipes, tips, techniques and general exchange of lore on the process, methods and history of wine making. Includes traditional grape wines, sparkling wines & champagnes. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I received some very interesting advice a month or two ago,concerning
the thinning of vertical shoots for grapes trained in the Double Guyot method.I pruned the sidehoots to one or two leaves earlier when the canopy was in full growth,and since the beginning of August have left more on.I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago to help ripening. I have an excellent crop this year,which seems to be ripening well.My mini vineyard is in Herefordshire,England,and we have to be satisfied with Brix values maximising at about 18 for reds or whites.However one of my reds is already at 14.0,a couple of weeks before harvest,which will be early this year in England.Our temperatures have not been great in the daytime at 20-22C,but the night time temperatures have not fallen below 15C.I live about 120 miles from my vines,so have to make a judgement when to visit.The average temperature (24hr average) at present is about 15C,and I am wondering if anyone uses a rule of thumb to estimate the increase in Brix/day for a given average(24hr) temperature. I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in ripening fruit.We have a large damson tree in our garden,which produces a good crop of sweet damsons each year.This year there has been an enormous crop (twice or three times normal),and they have all fallen now,but with none of them ripe.I assume that this is the same with vines.The balance of leaf to fruit is crucial,and with a large crop,it is important to maintain a maximum leaf area,consistent with keeping protection against powdery mildew-good air flow and spray coverage. I have also for the first time put on a three inch layer of garden compost around each vine in the early spring period.I had not done this previously,since I thought the vines were vigorous enough in our cool climate.However,although the vigour has increased somewhat further,the vines look incredibly healthy,with little powdery mildew, and I had a very good flower set.I think the compost keeps the soil more moist,thus avoiding a major powdery mildew attack in very dry spells. Michael |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in
ripening fruit." "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago to help ripening." I think you had the right idea in the first comment. Pulling leaves doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will delay it. The vine takes time to readjust it's physiology to compensate for the lost leaves. In an environment like yours you need all the leaves you can get. People who grow grapes in California or an area with more sunshine and heat have much more room to hack up the vines, you don't. " On Aug 28, 8:36*am, michael > wrote: > I received some very interesting advice a month or two ago,concerning > the thinning of vertical shoots for grapes trained in the Double Guyot > method.I pruned the sidehoots to one or two leaves earlier when the > canopy was in full growth,and since the beginning of August have left > more on.I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > to help ripening. > I have an excellent crop this year,which seems to be ripening well.My > mini vineyard is in Herefordshire,England,and we have to be satisfied > with Brix values maximising at about 18 for reds or whites.However one > of my reds is already at 14.0,a couple of weeks before harvest,which > will be early this year in England.Our temperatures have not been > great in the daytime at 20-22C,but the night time temperatures have > not fallen below 15C.I live about 120 miles from my vines,so have to > make a judgement when to visit.The average temperature (24hr average) > at present is about 15C,and I am wondering if anyone uses a rule of > thumb to estimate the increase in Brix/day for a given average(24hr) > temperature. > > I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > ripening fruit.We have a large damson tree in our garden,which > produces a good crop of sweet damsons each year.This year there has > been an enormous crop (twice or three times normal),and they have all > fallen now,but with none of them ripe.I assume that this is the same > with vines.The balance of leaf to fruit is crucial,and with a large > crop,it is important to maintain a maximum leaf area,consistent with > keeping protection against powdery mildew-good air flow and spray > coverage. > > I have also for the first time put on a three inch layer of garden > compost around each vine in the early spring period.I had not done > this previously,since I thought the vines were vigorous enough in our > cool climate.However,although the vigour has increased somewhat > further,the vines look incredibly healthy,with little powdery mildew, > and I had a very good flower set.I think the compost keeps the soil > more moist,thus avoiding a major powdery mildew attack in very dry > spells. > > Michael |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael,
Glad you decided to mulch. You will be happy with the results. Plant roots can't get at any nutrients unless the soil is moist. I probably gained 2 brix the first year I mulched. The vines are just healthier and produce better. If you think about it, grapes are the only plant on the planet where the growers think mulch is some sort of poisionous addition. It's pretty hilarious. Anyway, a plant is a plant and if it makes my tomatoes and peaches sweeter than it's only logical it would make my grapes sweeter, and it does. My best advice is: never stop observing. On Aug 28, 8:36*am, michael > wrote: > I received some very interesting advice a month or two ago,concerning > the thinning of vertical shoots for grapes trained in the Double Guyot > method.I pruned the sidehoots to one or two leaves earlier when the > canopy was in full growth,and since the beginning of August have left > more on.I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > to help ripening. > I have an excellent crop this year,which seems to be ripening well.My > mini vineyard is in Herefordshire,England,and we have to be satisfied > with Brix values maximising at about 18 for reds or whites.However one > of my reds is already at 14.0,a couple of weeks before harvest,which > will be early this year in England.Our temperatures have not been > great in the daytime at 20-22C,but the night time temperatures have > not fallen below 15C.I live about 120 miles from my vines,so have to > make a judgement when to visit.The average temperature (24hr average) > at present is about 15C,and I am wondering if anyone uses a rule of > thumb to estimate the increase in Brix/day for a given average(24hr) > temperature. > > I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > ripening fruit.We have a large damson tree in our garden,which > produces a good crop of sweet damsons each year.This year there has > been an enormous crop (twice or three times normal),and they have all > fallen now,but with none of them ripe.I assume that this is the same > with vines.The balance of leaf to fruit is crucial,and with a large > crop,it is important to maintain a maximum leaf area,consistent with > keeping protection against powdery mildew-good air flow and spray > coverage. > > I have also for the first time put on a three inch layer of garden > compost around each vine in the early spring period.I had not done > this previously,since I thought the vines were vigorous enough in our > cool climate.However,although the vigour has increased somewhat > further,the vines look incredibly healthy,with little powdery mildew, > and I had a very good flower set.I think the compost keeps the soil > more moist,thus avoiding a major powdery mildew attack in very dry > spells. > > Michael |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
> "I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > ripening fruit." > > "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > to help ripening." > > I think you had the right idea in the first comment. Pulling leaves > doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will delay it. The vine takes time > to readjust it's physiology to compensate for the lost leaves. In an > environment like yours you need all the leaves you can get. People who > grow grapes in California or an area with more sunshine and heat have > much more room to hack up the vines, you don't. Here is an excellent article on the subject. Most of this research supports doublesb's previous comments but also note the authors comments about situations of extreme vigor. http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=...e&dataId=10457 Paul >> On Aug 28, 8:36Â*am, michael > wrote: >> I received some very interesting advice a month or two ago,concerning >> the thinning of vertical shoots for grapes trained in the Double Guyot >> method.I pruned the sidehoots to one or two leaves earlier when the >> canopy was in full growth,and since the beginning of August have left >> more on.I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago >> to help ripening. >> I have an excellent crop this year,which seems to be ripening well.My >> mini vineyard is in Herefordshire,England,and we have to be satisfied >> with Brix values maximising at about 18 for reds or whites.However one >> of my reds is already at 14.0,a couple of weeks before harvest,which >> will be early this year in England.Our temperatures have not been >> great in the daytime at 20-22C,but the night time temperatures have >> not fallen below 15C.I live about 120 miles from my vines,so have to >> make a judgement when to visit.The average temperature (24hr average) >> at present is about 15C,and I am wondering if anyone uses a rule of >> thumb to estimate the increase in Brix/day for a given average(24hr) >> temperature. >> >> I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in >> ripening fruit.We have a large damson tree in our garden,which >> produces a good crop of sweet damsons each year.This year there has >> been an enormous crop (twice or three times normal),and they have all >> fallen now,but with none of them ripe.I assume that this is the same >> with vines.The balance of leaf to fruit is crucial,and with a large >> crop,it is important to maintain a maximum leaf area,consistent with >> keeping protection against powdery mildew-good air flow and spray >> coverage. >> >> I have also for the first time put on a three inch layer of garden >> compost around each vine in the early spring period.I had not done >> this previously,since I thought the vines were vigorous enough in our >> cool climate.However,although the vigour has increased somewhat >> further,the vines look incredibly healthy,with little powdery mildew, >> and I had a very good flower set.I think the compost keeps the soil >> more moist,thus avoiding a major powdery mildew attack in very dry >> spells. >> >> Michael |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30 Aug, 02:17, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote:
> wrote: > > "I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > > *ripening fruit." > > > "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > > *to help ripening." > > > I think you had the right idea in the first comment. Pulling leaves > > doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will delay it. The vine takes time > > to readjust it's physiology to compensate for the lost leaves. In an > > environment like yours you need alent from the leaves you can get. People who > > grow grapes in California or an area with more sunshine and heat have > > much more room to hack up the vines, you don't. > > Here is an excellent article on the subject. > Most of this research supports doublesb's previous comments but also note > the authors comments about situations of extreme vigor. > > http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=...e&dataId=10457 > > Paul > > > > >> On Aug 28, 8:36*am, michael > wrote: > >> I received some very interesting advice a month or two ago,concerning > >> the thinning of vertical shoots for grapes trained in the Double Guyot > >> method.I pruned the sidehoots to one or two leaves earlier when the > >> canopy was in full growth,and since the beginning of August have left > >> more on.I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > >> to help ripening. > >> I have an excellent crop this year,which seems to be ripening well.My > >> mini vineyard is in Herefordshire,England,and we have to be satisfied > >> with Brix values maximising at about 18 for reds or whites.However one > >> of my reds is already at 14.0,a couple of weeks before harvest,which > >> will be early this year in England.Our temperatures have not been > >> great in the daytime at 20-22C,but the night time temperatures have > >> not fallen below 15C.I live about 120 miles from my vines,so have to > >> make a judgement when to visit.The average temperature (24hr average) > >> at present is about 15C,and I am wondering if anyone uses a rule of > >> thumb to estimate the increase in Brix/day for a given average(24hr) > >> temperature. > > >> I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > >> ripening fruit.We have a large damson tree in our garden,which > >> produces a good crop of sweet damsons each year.This year there has > >> been an enormous crop (twice or three times normal),and they have all > >> fallen now,but with none of them ripe.I assume that this is the same > >> with vines.The balance of leaf to fruit is crucial,and with a large > >> crop,it is important to maintain a maximum leaf area,consistent with > >> keeping protection against powdery mildew-good air flow and spray > >> coverage. > > >> I have also for the first time put on a three inch layer of garden > >> compost around each vine in the early spring period.I had not done > >> this previously,since I thought the vines were vigorous enough in our > >> cool climate.However,although the vigour has increased somewhat > >> further,the vines look incredibly healthy,with little powdery mildew, > >> and I had a very good flower set.I think the compost keeps the soil > >> more moist,thus avoiding a major powdery mildew attack in very dry > >> spells. > > >> Michael- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Thanks for those comments. The article you gave,Paul, is extremely interesting,and seems to deal exactly with my problems.I will study the article in more detail,but the comments on timing of removal of laterals seem to suggest that it is best to remove (or prune to three leaves) most of these during the early flowering and fruit set period,but leave them after veraison into the ripening phase.I think this is something like my practice.I find that I have to remove the laterals in June,otherwise the canopy becomes a completely tangled mess (especially this year after using compost)-but this is the period of flowering and fruitset,so presumably fine.Later from mid August,the vigour of the canopy slows down,and more laterals can be left.However I still find myself hedging the top of the canopy,which creates new growth rapidly-if I do not do this the canopy can become unstable in quite light winds we have in September/October. I was also very interested in the comment from doubi...,that using compost can add 2 Brix to the juice.I have certainly noted how much healthier my vines are this year-and more vigorous!! I have use garden compost plus some added fish blood and bone.Is it sensible to add compost each year,and in your experience,when is the best time to add it? Thanks again,Michael |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
michael wrote:
> On 30 Aug, 02:17, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: >> wrote: >> > "I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in >> > ripening fruit." >> >> > "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago >> > to help ripening." >> >> > I think you had the right idea in the first comment. Pulling leaves >> > doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will delay it. The vine takes time >> > to readjust it's physiology to compensate for the lost leaves. In an >> > environment like yours you need alent from the leaves you can get. >> > People who grow grapes in California or an area with more sunshine and >> > heat have much more room to hack up the vines, you don't. >> >> Here is an excellent article on the subject. >> Most of this research supports doublesb's previous comments but also note >> the authors comments about situations of extreme vigor. >> >> http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=...e&dataId=10457 >> >> Paul >> >> >> >> >> On Aug 28, 8:36Â*am, michael > wrote: >> >> I received some very interesting advice a month or two ago,concerning >> >> the thinning of vertical shoots for grapes trained in the Double Guyot >> >> method.I pruned the sidehoots to one or two leaves earlier when the >> >> canopy was in full growth,and since the beginning of August have left >> >> more on.I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago >> >> to help ripening. >> >> I have an excellent crop this year,which seems to be ripening well.My >> >> mini vineyard is in Herefordshire,England,and we have to be satisfied >> >> with Brix values maximising at about 18 for reds or whites.However one >> >> of my reds is already at 14.0,a couple of weeks before harvest,which >> >> will be early this year in England.Our temperatures have not been >> >> great in the daytime at 20-22C,but the night time temperatures have >> >> not fallen below 15C.I live about 120 miles from my vines,so have to >> >> make a judgement when to visit.The average temperature (24hr average) >> >> at present is about 15C,and I am wondering if anyone uses a rule of >> >> thumb to estimate the increase in Brix/day for a given average(24hr) >> >> temperature. >> >> >> I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in >> >> ripening fruit.We have a large damson tree in our garden,which >> >> produces a good crop of sweet damsons each year.This year there has >> >> been an enormous crop (twice or three times normal),and they have all >> >> fallen now,but with none of them ripe.I assume that this is the same >> >> with vines.The balance of leaf to fruit is crucial,and with a large >> >> crop,it is important to maintain a maximum leaf area,consistent with >> >> keeping protection against powdery mildew-good air flow and spray >> >> coverage. >> >> >> I have also for the first time put on a three inch layer of garden >> >> compost around each vine in the early spring period.I had not done >> >> this previously,since I thought the vines were vigorous enough in our >> >> cool climate.However,although the vigour has increased somewhat >> >> further,the vines look incredibly healthy,with little powdery mildew, >> >> and I had a very good flower set.I think the compost keeps the soil >> >> more moist,thus avoiding a major powdery mildew attack in very dry >> >> spells. >> >> >> Michael- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Thanks for those comments. > > The article you gave,Paul, is extremely interesting,and seems to deal > exactly with my problems.I will study the article in more detail,but > the comments on timing of removal of laterals seem to suggest that it > is best to remove (or prune to three leaves) most of these during the > early flowering and fruit set period,but leave them after veraison > into the ripening phase.I think this is something like my practice.I > find that I have to remove the laterals in June,otherwise the canopy > becomes a completely tangled mess (especially this year after using > compost)-but this is the period of flowering and fruitset,so > presumably fine.Later from mid August,the vigour of the canopy slows > down,and more laterals can be left.However I still find myself hedging > the top of the canopy,which creates new growth rapidly-if I do not do > this the canopy can become unstable in quite light winds we have in > September/October. > > I was also very interested in the comment from doubi...,that using > compost can add 2 Brix to the juice.I have certainly noted how much > healthier my vines are this year-and more vigorous!! I have use > garden compost plus some added fish blood and bone.Is it sensible to > add compost each year,and in your experience,when is the best time to > add it? > > Thanks again,Michael I seriously doubt than adding compost will add 2 brix. I would like to see doubi, or whatever his name actually is, point us to a literature cite. This flies in the face of research that indicates that when you already have vigorous growth, you do not further your problem. I think most research would indicate that increased vegetative growth has a negative effect on grape berry maturity. In my opinion and experience, adding brix is done by increasing growing degree days, hours of sunlight or cropping your vines so that you do not over crop. |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 Sep, 02:50, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote:
> michael wrote: > > On 30 Aug, 02:17, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > >> wrote: > >> > "I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > >> > ripening fruit." > > >> > "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > >> > to help ripening." > > >> > I think you had the right idea in the first comment. Pulling leaves > >> > doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will delay it. The vine takes time > >> > to readjust it's physiology to compensate for the lost leaves. In an > >> > environment like yours you need alent from *the leaves you can get.. > >> > People who grow grapes in California or an area with more sunshine and > >> > heat have much more room to hack up the vines, you don't. > > >> Here is an excellent article on the subject. > >> Most of this research supports doublesb's previous comments but also note > >> the authors comments about situations of extreme vigor. > > >>http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=...e&dataId=10457 > > >> Paul > > >> >> On Aug 28, 8:36*am, michael > wrote: > >> >> I received some very interesting advice a month or two ago,concerning > >> >> the thinning of vertical shoots for grapes trained in the Double Guyot > >> >> method.I pruned the sidehoots to one or two leaves earlier when the > >> >> canopy was in full growth,and since the beginning of August have left > >> >> more on.I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > >> >> to help ripening. > >> >> I have an excellent crop this year,which seems to be ripening well.My > >> >> mini vineyard is in Herefordshire,England,and we have to be satisfied > >> >> with Brix values maximising at about 18 for reds or whites.However one > >> >> of my reds is already at 14.0,a couple of weeks before harvest,which > >> >> will be early this year in England.Our temperatures have not been > >> >> great in the daytime at 20-22C,but the night time temperatures have > >> >> not fallen below 15C.I live about 120 miles from my vines,so have to > >> >> make a judgement when to visit.The average temperature (24hr average) > >> >> at present is about 15C,and I am wondering if anyone uses a rule of > >> >> thumb to estimate the increase in Brix/day for a given average(24hr) > >> >> temperature. > > >> >> I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > >> >> ripening fruit.We have a large damson tree in our garden,which > >> >> produces a good crop of sweet damsons each year.This year there has > >> >> been an enormous crop (twice or three times normal),and they have all > >> >> fallen now,but with none of them ripe.I assume that this is the same > >> >> with vines.The balance of leaf to fruit is crucial,and with a large > >> >> crop,it is important to maintain a maximum leaf area,consistent with > >> >> keeping protection against powdery mildew-good air flow and spray > >> >> coverage. > > >> >> I have also for the first time put on a three inch layer of garden > >> >> compost around each vine in the early spring period.I had not done > >> >> this previously,since I thought the vines were vigorous enough in our > >> >> cool climate.However,although the vigour has increased somewhat > >> >> further,the vines look incredibly healthy,with little powdery mildew, > >> >> and I had a very good flower set.I think the compost keeps the soil > >> >> more moist,thus avoiding a major powdery mildew attack in very dry > >> >> spells. > > >> >> Michael- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > Thanks for those comments. > > > The article you gave,Paul, is extremely interesting,and seems to deal > > exactly with my problems.I will study the article in more detail,but > > the comments on timing of removal of laterals seem to suggest that it > > is best to remove (or prune to three leaves) most of *these during the > > early flowering and fruit set period,but leave them after veraison > > into the ripening phase.I think this is something like my practice.I > > find that I have to remove the laterals in June,otherwise the canopy > > becomes a completely tangled mess (especially this year after using > > compost)-but this is the period of flowering and fruitset,so > > presumably fine.Later from mid August,the vigour of the canopy slows > > down,and more laterals can be left.However I still find myself hedging > > the top of the canopy,which creates new growth rapidly-if I do not do > > this the canopy can become unstable in quite light winds we have in > > September/October. > > > I was also very interested in the comment from doubi...,that using > > compost can add 2 Brix to the juice.I have certainly noted how much > > healthier my vines are this year-and more vigorous!! *I have use > > garden compost plus some added fish blood and bone.Is it sensible to > > add compost each year,and in your experience,when is the best time to > > add it? > > > Thanks again,Michael > > I seriously doubt than adding compost will add 2 brix. *I would like to see > doubi, or whatever his name actually is, point us to a literature cite. > > This flies in the face of research that indicates that when you already have > vigorous growth, you do not further your problem. *I think most research > would indicate that increased vegetative growth has a negative effect on > grape berry maturity. > > In my opinion and experience, adding brix is done by increasing growing > degree days, hours of sunlight or cropping your vines so that you do not > over crop.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Hi again, Does the ripening process depend on hours of sunlight or degree-days.This year my vines are cropping earlier than normal.There is also a very heavy crop,probably due to the excellent very warm June we had here.Since June the weather here has been mediocre during the day with average or slightly below average temperatures.However the overnight temperatures have been very consistently in the 14-17C minimum range ,which is well above average for England.So I am postulating that it is the number of degree-days (above 10C I think) over a 24 hr period which is ripening my grapes early.There certainly has been a shortage of sunshine this year. On the compost question,I thought that it was always useful to add compost around the vine (maybe without any added fertiliser annually),to avoid the vines roots drying out during a very dry spell,which would encourage powdery mildew.My vines are on a s-facing slope on dry limestone soil,so always have a tendency to dry out. Several books on vineyard management do encourage the use of compost,but maybe my vines are vigorous enough. Best regards Michael |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Micheal,
Always trust your eyes and keep observing. Paul, without any proof, is saying that what I have observed and what you have have observed couldn't be true. It sounds like in your case, mulching has helped tremendously. There are many reasons for mulch and the main reason is that a healthy vine is a good vine. It's as simple as that. > On 3 Sep, 02:50, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > > > > > > > michael wrote: > > > On 30 Aug, 02:17, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > > >> wrote: > > >> > "I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > > >> > ripening fruit." > > > >> > "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > > >> > to help ripening." > > > >> > I think you had the right idea in the first comment. Pulling leaves > > >> > doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will delay it. The vine takes time > > >> > to readjust it's physiology to compensate for the lost leaves. In an > > >> > environment like yours you need alent from *the leaves you can get. > > >> > People who grow grapes in California or an area with more sunshine and > > >> > heat have much more room to hack up the vines, you don't. > > > >> Here is an excellent article on the subject. > > >> Most of this research supports doublesb's previous comments but also note > > >> the authors comments about situations of extreme vigor. > > > >>http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=...e&dataId=10457 > > > >> Paul > > > >> >> On Aug 28, 8:36*am, michael > wrote: > > >> >> I received some very interesting advice a month or two ago,concerning > > >> >> the thinning of vertical shoots for grapes trained in the Double Guyot > > >> >> method.I pruned the sidehoots to one or two leaves earlier when the > > >> >> canopy was in full growth,and since the beginning of August have left > > >> >> more on.I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > > >> >> to help ripening. > > >> >> I have an excellent crop this year,which seems to be ripening well.My > > >> >> mini vineyard is in Herefordshire,England,and we have to be satisfied > > >> >> with Brix values maximising at about 18 for reds or whites.However one > > >> >> of my reds is already at 14.0,a couple of weeks before harvest,which > > >> >> will be early this year in England.Our temperatures have not been > > >> >> great in the daytime at 20-22C,but the night time temperatures have > > >> >> not fallen below 15C.I live about 120 miles from my vines,so have to > > >> >> make a judgement when to visit.The average temperature (24hr average) > > >> >> at present is about 15C,and I am wondering if anyone uses a rule of > > >> >> thumb to estimate the increase in Brix/day for a given average(24hr) > > >> >> temperature. > > > >> >> I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > > >> >> ripening fruit.We have a large damson tree in our garden,which > > >> >> produces a good crop of sweet damsons each year.This year there has > > >> >> been an enormous crop (twice or three times normal),and they have all > > >> >> fallen now,but with none of them ripe.I assume that this is the same > > >> >> with vines.The balance of leaf to fruit is crucial,and with a large > > >> >> crop,it is important to maintain a maximum leaf area,consistent with > > >> >> keeping protection against powdery mildew-good air flow and spray > > >> >> coverage. > > > >> >> I have also for the first time put on a three inch layer of garden > > >> >> compost around each vine in the early spring period.I had not done > > >> >> this previously,since I thought the vines were vigorous enough in our > > >> >> cool climate.However,although the vigour has increased somewhat > > >> >> further,the vines look incredibly healthy,with little powdery mildew, > > >> >> and I had a very good flower set.I think the compost keeps the soil > > >> >> more moist,thus avoiding a major powdery mildew attack in very dry > > >> >> spells. > > > >> >> Michael- Hide quoted text - > > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > Thanks for those comments. > > > > The article you gave,Paul, is extremely interesting,and seems to deal > > > exactly with my problems.I will study the article in more detail,but > > > the comments on timing of removal of laterals seem to suggest that it > > > is best to remove (or prune to three leaves) most of *these during the > > > early flowering and fruit set period,but leave them after veraison > > > into the ripening phase.I think this is something like my practice.I > > > find that I have to remove the laterals in June,otherwise the canopy > > > becomes a completely tangled mess (especially this year after using > > > compost)-but this is the period of flowering and fruitset,so > > > presumably fine.Later from mid August,the vigour of the canopy slows > > > down,and more laterals can be left.However I still find myself hedging > > > the top of the canopy,which creates new growth rapidly-if I do not do > > > this the canopy can become unstable in quite light winds we have in > > > September/October. > > > > I was also very interested in the comment from doubi...,that using > > > compost can add 2 Brix to the juice.I have certainly noted how much > > > healthier my vines are this year-and more vigorous!! *I have use > > > garden compost plus some added fish blood and bone.Is it sensible to > > > add compost each year,and in your experience,when is the best time to > > > add it? > > > > Thanks again,Michael > > > I seriously doubt than adding compost will add 2 brix. *I would like to see > > doubi, or whatever his name actually is, point us to a literature cite. > > > This flies in the face of research that indicates that when you already have > > vigorous growth, you do not further your problem. *I think most research > > would indicate that increased vegetative growth has a negative effect on > > grape berry maturity. > > > In my opinion and experience, adding brix is done by increasing growing > > degree days, hours of sunlight or cropping your vines so that you do not > > over crop.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Hi again, > * * * * * * * *Does the ripening process depend on hours of sunlight > or degree-days.This year my vines are cropping earlier than > normal.There is also a very heavy crop,probably due to the excellent > very warm June we had here.Since June the weather here has been > mediocre during the day with average or slightly below average > temperatures.However the overnight temperatures have been very > consistently in the 14-17C minimum range ,which is well above average > for England.So I am postulating that it is the number of degree-days > (above 10C I think) over a 24 hr period which is ripening my grapes > early.There certainly has been a shortage of sunshine this year. > On the compost question,I thought that it was always useful to add > compost around the vine (maybe without any added fertiliser > annually),to avoid the vines roots drying out during a very dry > spell,which would encourage powdery mildew.My vines are on a s-facing > slope on dry limestone soil,so always have a tendency to dry out. > Several books on vineyard management do encourage the use of > compost,but maybe my vines are vigorous enough. > Best regards > Michael |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 2, 8:50*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote:
> michael wrote: > > On 30 Aug, 02:17, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > >> wrote: > >> > "I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > >> > ripening fruit." > > >> > "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > >> > to help ripening." > > >> > I think you had the right idea in the first comment. Pulling leaves > >> > doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will delay it. The vine takes time > >> > to readjust it's physiology to compensate for the lost leaves. In an > >> > environment like yours you need alent from *the leaves you can get.. > >> > People who grow grapes in California or an area with more sunshine and > >> > heat have much more room to hack up the vines, you don't. > > >> Here is an excellent article on the subject. > >> Most of this research supports doublesb's previous comments but also note > >> the authors comments about situations of extreme vigor. > > >>http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=...e&dataId=10457 > > >> Paul > > >> >> On Aug 28, 8:36*am, michael > wrote: > >> >> I received some very interesting advice a month or two ago,concerning > >> >> the thinning of vertical shoots for grapes trained in the Double Guyot > >> >> method.I pruned the sidehoots to one or two leaves earlier when the > >> >> canopy was in full growth,and since the beginning of August have left > >> >> more on.I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > >> >> to help ripening. > >> >> I have an excellent crop this year,which seems to be ripening well.My > >> >> mini vineyard is in Herefordshire,England,and we have to be satisfied > >> >> with Brix values maximising at about 18 for reds or whites.However one > >> >> of my reds is already at 14.0,a couple of weeks before harvest,which > >> >> will be early this year in England.Our temperatures have not been > >> >> great in the daytime at 20-22C,but the night time temperatures have > >> >> not fallen below 15C.I live about 120 miles from my vines,so have to > >> >> make a judgement when to visit.The average temperature (24hr average) > >> >> at present is about 15C,and I am wondering if anyone uses a rule of > >> >> thumb to estimate the increase in Brix/day for a given average(24hr) > >> >> temperature. > > >> >> I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > >> >> ripening fruit.We have a large damson tree in our garden,which > >> >> produces a good crop of sweet damsons each year.This year there has > >> >> been an enormous crop (twice or three times normal),and they have all > >> >> fallen now,but with none of them ripe.I assume that this is the same > >> >> with vines.The balance of leaf to fruit is crucial,and with a large > >> >> crop,it is important to maintain a maximum leaf area,consistent with > >> >> keeping protection against powdery mildew-good air flow and spray > >> >> coverage. > > >> >> I have also for the first time put on a three inch layer of garden > >> >> compost around each vine in the early spring period.I had not done > >> >> this previously,since I thought the vines were vigorous enough in our > >> >> cool climate.However,although the vigour has increased somewhat > >> >> further,the vines look incredibly healthy,with little powdery mildew, > >> >> and I had a very good flower set.I think the compost keeps the soil > >> >> more moist,thus avoiding a major powdery mildew attack in very dry > >> >> spells. > > >> >> Michael- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > Thanks for those comments. > > > The article you gave,Paul, is extremely interesting,and seems to deal > > exactly with my problems.I will study the article in more detail,but > > the comments on timing of removal of laterals seem to suggest that it > > is best to remove (or prune to three leaves) most of *these during the > > early flowering and fruit set period,but leave them after veraison > > into the ripening phase.I think this is something like my practice.I > > find that I have to remove the laterals in June,otherwise the canopy > > becomes a completely tangled mess (especially this year after using > > compost)-but this is the period of flowering and fruitset,so > > presumably fine.Later from mid August,the vigour of the canopy slows > > down,and more laterals can be left.However I still find myself hedging > > the top of the canopy,which creates new growth rapidly-if I do not do > > this the canopy can become unstable in quite light winds we have in > > September/October. > > > I was also very interested in the comment from doubi...,that using > > compost can add 2 Brix to the juice.I have certainly noted how much > > healthier my vines are this year-and more vigorous!! *I have use > > garden compost plus some added fish blood and bone.Is it sensible to > > add compost each year,and in your experience,when is the best time to > > add it? > > > Thanks again,Michael > > I seriously doubt than adding compost will add 2 brix. *I would like to see > doubi, or whatever his name actually is, point us to a literature cite. > > This flies in the face of research that indicates that when you already have > vigorous growth, you do not further your problem. *I think most research > would indicate that increased vegetative growth has a negative effect on > grape berry maturity. > > In my opinion and experience, adding brix is done by increasing growing > degree days, hours of sunlight or cropping your vines so that you do not > over crop. |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul,
Why don't you mulch a couple vines next year and get back to us with the results? On Sep 2, 8:50*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > michael wrote: > > On 30 Aug, 02:17, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > >> wrote: > >> > "I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > >> > ripening fruit." > > >> > "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > >> > to help ripening." > > >> > I think you had the right idea in the first comment. Pulling leaves > >> > doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will delay it. The vine takes time > >> > to readjust it's physiology to compensate for the lost leaves. In an > >> > environment like yours you need alent from *the leaves you can get.. > >> > People who grow grapes in California or an area with more sunshine and > >> > heat have much more room to hack up the vines, you don't. > > >> Here is an excellent article on the subject. > >> Most of this research supports doublesb's previous comments but also note > >> the authors comments about situations of extreme vigor. > > >>http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=...e&dataId=10457 > > >> Paul > > >> >> On Aug 28, 8:36*am, michael > wrote: > >> >> I received some very interesting advice a month or two ago,concerning > >> >> the thinning of vertical shoots for grapes trained in the Double Guyot > >> >> method.I pruned the sidehoots to one or two leaves earlier when the > >> >> canopy was in full growth,and since the beginning of August have left > >> >> more on.I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > >> >> to help ripening. > >> >> I have an excellent crop this year,which seems to be ripening well.My > >> >> mini vineyard is in Herefordshire,England,and we have to be satisfied > >> >> with Brix values maximising at about 18 for reds or whites.However one > >> >> of my reds is already at 14.0,a couple of weeks before harvest,which > >> >> will be early this year in England.Our temperatures have not been > >> >> great in the daytime at 20-22C,but the night time temperatures have > >> >> not fallen below 15C.I live about 120 miles from my vines,so have to > >> >> make a judgement when to visit.The average temperature (24hr average) > >> >> at present is about 15C,and I am wondering if anyone uses a rule of > >> >> thumb to estimate the increase in Brix/day for a given average(24hr) > >> >> temperature. > > >> >> I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > >> >> ripening fruit.We have a large damson tree in our garden,which > >> >> produces a good crop of sweet damsons each year.This year there has > >> >> been an enormous crop (twice or three times normal),and they have all > >> >> fallen now,but with none of them ripe.I assume that this is the same > >> >> with vines.The balance of leaf to fruit is crucial,and with a large > >> >> crop,it is important to maintain a maximum leaf area,consistent with > >> >> keeping protection against powdery mildew-good air flow and spray > >> >> coverage. > > >> >> I have also for the first time put on a three inch layer of garden > >> >> compost around each vine in the early spring period.I had not done > >> >> this previously,since I thought the vines were vigorous enough in our > >> >> cool climate.However,although the vigour has increased somewhat > >> >> further,the vines look incredibly healthy,with little powdery mildew, > >> >> and I had a very good flower set.I think the compost keeps the soil > >> >> more moist,thus avoiding a major powdery mildew attack in very dry > >> >> spells. > > >> >> Michael- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > Thanks for those comments. > > > The article you gave,Paul, is extremely interesting,and seems to deal > > exactly with my problems.I will study the article in more detail,but > > the comments on timing of removal of laterals seem to suggest that it > > is best to remove (or prune to three leaves) most of *these during the > > early flowering and fruit set period,but leave them after veraison > > into the ripening phase.I think this is something like my practice.I > > find that I have to remove the laterals in June,otherwise the canopy > > becomes a completely tangled mess (especially this year after using > > compost)-but this is the period of flowering and fruitset,so > > presumably fine.Later from mid August,the vigour of the canopy slows > > down,and more laterals can be left.However I still find myself hedging > > the top of the canopy,which creates new growth rapidly-if I do not do > > this the canopy can become unstable in quite light winds we have in > > September/October. > > > I was also very interested in the comment from doubi...,that using > > compost can add 2 Brix to the juice.I have certainly noted how much > > healthier my vines are this year-and more vigorous!! *I have use > > garden compost plus some added fish blood and bone.Is it sensible to > > add compost each year,and in your experience,when is the best time to > > add it? > > > Thanks again,Michael > > I seriously doubt than adding compost will add 2 brix. *I would like to see > doubi, or whatever his name actually is, point us to a literature cite. > > This flies in the face of research that indicates that when you already have > vigorous growth, you do not further your problem. *I think most research > would indicate that increased vegetative growth has a negative effect on > grape berry maturity. > > In my opinion and experience, adding brix is done by increasing growing > degree days, hours of sunlight or cropping your vines so that you do not > over crop. |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually,
Mulching NOW is a great time as the vines suck up nutrients into their roots in October. Remember, don't mulch over dry ground. Wait until it rains heavily then use the mulch to seal it in. On Sep 3, 8:07*am, wrote: > Paul, > > Why don't you mulch a couple vines next year and get back to us with > the results? > > On Sep 2, 8:50*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > > > > > michael wrote: > > > On 30 Aug, 02:17, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > > >> wrote: > > >> > "I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > > >> > ripening fruit." > > > >> > "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > > >> > to help ripening." > > > >> > I think you had the right idea in the first comment. Pulling leaves > > >> > doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will delay it. The vine takes time > > >> > to readjust it's physiology to compensate for the lost leaves. In an > > >> > environment like yours you need alent from *the leaves you can get. > > >> > People who grow grapes in California or an area with more sunshine and > > >> > heat have much more room to hack up the vines, you don't. > > > >> Here is an excellent article on the subject. > > >> Most of this research supports doublesb's previous comments but also note > > >> the authors comments about situations of extreme vigor. > > > >>http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=...e&dataId=10457 > > > >> Paul > > > >> >> On Aug 28, 8:36*am, michael > wrote: > > >> >> I received some very interesting advice a month or two ago,concerning > > >> >> the thinning of vertical shoots for grapes trained in the Double Guyot > > >> >> method.I pruned the sidehoots to one or two leaves earlier when the > > >> >> canopy was in full growth,and since the beginning of August have left > > >> >> more on.I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > > >> >> to help ripening. > > >> >> I have an excellent crop this year,which seems to be ripening well.My > > >> >> mini vineyard is in Herefordshire,England,and we have to be satisfied > > >> >> with Brix values maximising at about 18 for reds or whites.However one > > >> >> of my reds is already at 14.0,a couple of weeks before harvest,which > > >> >> will be early this year in England.Our temperatures have not been > > >> >> great in the daytime at 20-22C,but the night time temperatures have > > >> >> not fallen below 15C.I live about 120 miles from my vines,so have to > > >> >> make a judgement when to visit.The average temperature (24hr average) > > >> >> at present is about 15C,and I am wondering if anyone uses a rule of > > >> >> thumb to estimate the increase in Brix/day for a given average(24hr) > > >> >> temperature. > > > >> >> I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > > >> >> ripening fruit.We have a large damson tree in our garden,which > > >> >> produces a good crop of sweet damsons each year.This year there has > > >> >> been an enormous crop (twice or three times normal),and they have all > > >> >> fallen now,but with none of them ripe.I assume that this is the same > > >> >> with vines.The balance of leaf to fruit is crucial,and with a large > > >> >> crop,it is important to maintain a maximum leaf area,consistent with > > >> >> keeping protection against powdery mildew-good air flow and spray > > >> >> coverage. > > > >> >> I have also for the first time put on a three inch layer of garden > > >> >> compost around each vine in the early spring period.I had not done > > >> >> this previously,since I thought the vines were vigorous enough in our > > >> >> cool climate.However,although the vigour has increased somewhat > > >> >> further,the vines look incredibly healthy,with little powdery mildew, > > >> >> and I had a very good flower set.I think the compost keeps the soil > > >> >> more moist,thus avoiding a major powdery mildew attack in very dry > > >> >> spells. > > > >> >> Michael- Hide quoted text - > > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > Thanks for those comments. > > > > The article you gave,Paul, is extremely interesting,and seems to deal > > > exactly with my problems.I will study the article in more detail,but > > > the comments on timing of removal of laterals seem to suggest that it > > > is best to remove (or prune to three leaves) most of *these during the > > > early flowering and fruit set period,but leave them after veraison > > > into the ripening phase.I think this is something like my practice.I > > > find that I have to remove the laterals in June,otherwise the canopy > > > becomes a completely tangled mess (especially this year after using > > > compost)-but this is the period of flowering and fruitset,so > > > presumably fine.Later from mid August,the vigour of the canopy slows > > > down,and more laterals can be left.However I still find myself hedging > > > the top of the canopy,which creates new growth rapidly-if I do not do > > > this the canopy can become unstable in quite light winds we have in > > > September/October. > > > > I was also very interested in the comment from doubi...,that using > > > compost can add 2 Brix to the juice.I have certainly noted how much > > > healthier my vines are this year-and more vigorous!! *I have use > > > garden compost plus some added fish blood and bone.Is it sensible to > > > add compost each year,and in your experience,when is the best time to > > > add it? > > > > Thanks again,Michael > > > I seriously doubt than adding compost will add 2 brix. *I would like to see > > doubi, or whatever his name actually is, point us to a literature cite. > > > This flies in the face of research that indicates that when you already have > > vigorous growth, you do not further your problem. *I think most research > > would indicate that increased vegetative growth has a negative effect on > > grape berry maturity. > > > In my opinion and experience, adding brix is done by increasing growing > > degree days, hours of sunlight or cropping your vines so that you do not > > over crop. |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" The thing(s) that increase
brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days." That is not true. If what you say is true than growing a vine in the sahara desert would yield the best grapes. "You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell them of > your 2 brix increase revelation. " Most viticulturists are like you, they claim that grape vines grow better with no water. Maybe that is why the Fench only have "vintage years" every 20 years or so. "Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial > growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor." And I'm sure they also fertilize. If they put their mouths were their money was they wouldn't feritlize. BTW, fertilizer is USELESS if there is no water in the soil for the roots to soak it up which blows away your theory about vines growing well in "arid" regions. While grapes roots do go deep a good percentage of them are near the surface. "You will also find many references in the literature that state grapes do no > like wet feet" They don't like wet feet. What they like is well drained soil which by design dries out FAST. That is why mulching over optimum soil is the RIGHT thing to do. " On Sep 3, 8:43*am, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > wrote: > > Micheal, > > > Always trust your eyes and keep observing. > > The very best thing for Michael to do is an experiment where he mulches a > row or rows and leaves the others unmulched and see if he gets the "2 brix" > increase on the mulched rows that you claim. The thing(s) that increase > brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days. *Perhaps the only > thing Michael can do is cut down trees or other obstacles obstructing > sunlight. > > You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell them of > your 2 brix increase revelation. *I am sure you could start a new trend in > grape growing. > > You never did answer my question that I asked in the past; where are you > growing your grapes and what are you growing? > > > Paul, without any proof, is > > saying that what I have observed and what you have have observed > > couldn't be true. > > Paul at least uses his real name. > > I am saying that I have no doubt that mulching will increase vigor. > Increased vigor in an already vigorous situation will NOT improve grape > quality. *In fact, it will do just the opposite. Do you like your wine to > smell and taste like vegetables? *Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial > growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor. > > > It sounds like in your case, mulching has helped > > tremendously. There are many reasons for mulch and the main reason is > > that a healthy vine is a good vine. It's as simple as that. > > The French say that the best wine is made from the struggling vine. *Hmmm, > something to think about there, doublesb. > > You will also find many references in the literature that state grapes do no > like wet feet. *Grape vine roots can go VERY deep; *deeper than almost all > other plants. *You can not compare the root system of other shallow rooted > plants to grape vines. *Promoting a shallow root system is not a good thing > to do for grape vines. *Also consider where Vitis Vinifera originated - NOT > in parts of the world that had vigorous growth. Also, it is most > successfully grown - in semi arid areas. > > > > > > >> On 3 Sep, 02:50, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > > >> > michael wrote: > >> > > On 30 Aug, 02:17, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > "I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > >> > >> > ripening fruit." > > >> > >> > "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > >> > >> > to help ripening." > > >> > >> > I think you had the right idea in the first comment. Pulling > >> > >> > leaves doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will delay it. The vine > >> > >> > takes time to readjust it's physiology to compensate for the lost > >> > >> > leaves. In an environment like yours you need alent from *the > >> > >> > leaves you can get. People who grow grapes in California or an > >> > >> > area with more sunshine and heat have much more room to hack up > >> > >> > the vines, you don't. > > >> > >> Here is an excellent article on the subject. > >> > >> Most of this research supports doublesb's previous comments but also > >> > >> note the authors comments about situations of extreme vigor. > > >> > >>http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=...e&dataId=10457 > > >> > >> Paul > > >> > >> >> On Aug 28, 8:36*am, michael > wrote: > >> > >> >> I received some very interesting advice a month or two > >> > >> >> ago,concerning the thinning of vertical shoots for grapes trained > >> > >> >> in the Double Guyot method.I pruned the sidehoots to one or two > >> > >> >> leaves earlier when the canopy was in full growth,and since the > >> > >> >> beginning of August have left more on.I removed some lower leaves > >> > >> >> just before netting a few days ago to help ripening. > >> > >> >> I have an excellent crop this year,which seems to be ripening > >> > >> >> well.My mini vineyard is in Herefordshire,England,and we have to > >> > >> >> be satisfied with Brix values maximising at about 18 for reds or > >> > >> >> whites.However one of my reds is already at 14.0,a couple of > >> > >> >> weeks before harvest,which will be early this year in England.Our > >> > >> >> temperatures have not been great in the daytime at 20-22C,but the > >> > >> >> night time temperatures have not fallen below 15C.I live about > >> > >> >> 120 miles from my vines,so have to make a judgement when to > >> > >> >> visit.The average temperature (24hr average) at present is about > >> > >> >> 15C,and I am wondering if anyone uses a rule of thumb to estimate > >> > >> >> the increase in Brix/day for a given average(24hr) temperature.. > > >> > >> >> I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > >> > >> >> ripening fruit.We have a large damson tree in our garden,which > >> > >> >> produces a good crop of sweet damsons each year.This year there > >> > >> >> has been an enormous crop (twice or three times normal),and they > >> > >> >> have all fallen now,but with none of them ripe.I assume that this > >> > >> >> is the same with vines.The balance of leaf to fruit is > >> > >> >> crucial,and with a large crop,it is important to maintain a > >> > >> >> maximum leaf area,consistent with keeping protection against > >> > >> >> powdery mildew-good air flow and spray coverage. > > >> > >> >> I have also for the first time put on a three inch layer of > >> > >> >> garden compost around each vine in the early spring period.I had > >> > >> >> not done this previously,since I thought the vines were vigorous > >> > >> >> enough in our cool climate.However,although the vigour has > >> > >> >> increased somewhat further,the vines look incredibly healthy,with > >> > >> >> little powdery mildew, and I had a very good flower set.I think > >> > >> >> the compost keeps the soil more moist,thus avoiding a major > >> > >> >> powdery mildew attack in very dry spells. > > >> > >> >> Michael- Hide quoted text - > > >> > >> - Show quoted text - > > >> > > Thanks for those comments. > > >> > > The article you gave,Paul, is extremely interesting,and seems to deal > >> > > exactly with my problems.I will study the article in more detail,but > >> > > the comments on timing of removal of laterals seem to suggest that it > >> > > is best to remove (or prune to three leaves) most of *these during > >> > > the early flowering and fruit set period,but leave them after > >> > > veraison into the ripening phase.I think this is something like my > >> > > practice.I find that I have to remove the laterals in June,otherwise > >> > > the canopy becomes a completely tangled mess (especially this year > >> > > after using compost)-but this is the period of flowering and > >> > > fruitset,so presumably fine.Later from mid August,the vigour of the > >> > > canopy slows down,and more laterals can be left.However I still find > >> > > myself hedging the top of the canopy,which creates new growth > >> > > rapidly-if I do not do this the canopy can become unstable in quite > >> > > light winds we have in September/October. > > >> > > I was also very interested in the comment from doubi...,that using > >> > > compost can add 2 Brix to the juice.I have certainly noted how much > >> > > healthier my vines are this year-and more vigorous!! *I have use > >> > > garden compost plus some added fish blood and bone.Is it sensible to > >> > > add compost each year,and in your experience,when is the best time to > >> > > add it? > > >> > > Thanks again,Michael > > >> > I seriously doubt than adding compost will add 2 brix. *I would like to > >> > see doubi, or whatever his name actually is, point us to a literature > >> > cite. > > >> > This flies in the face of research that indicates that when you already > >> > have vigorous growth, you do not further your problem. *I think most > >> > research would indicate that increased vegetative growth has a negative > >> > effect on grape berry maturity. > > >> > In my opinion and experience, adding brix is done by increasing growing > >> > degree days, hours of sunlight or cropping your vines so that you do > >> > not over crop.- Hide quoted text - > > >> > - Show quoted text - > > >> Hi again, > >> Does the ripening process depend on hours of sunlight > >> or degree-days.This year my vines are cropping earlier than > >> normal.There is also a very heavy crop,probably due to the excellent > >> very warm June we had here.Since June the weather here has been > >> mediocre during the day with average or slightly below average > >> temperatures.However the overnight temperatures have been very > >> consistently in the 14-17C minimum range ,which is well above average > >> for England.So I am postulating that it is the number of degree-days > >> (above 10C I think) over a 24 hr period which is ripening my grapes > >> early.There certainly has been a shortage of sunshine this year. > >> On the compost question,I thought that it was always useful to add > >> compost around the vine (maybe without any added fertiliser > >> annually),to avoid the vines roots drying out during a very dry > >> spell,which would encourage powdery mildew.My vines are on a s-facing > >> slope on dry limestone soil,so always have a tendency to dry out. > >> Several books on vineyard management do encourage the use of > >> compost,but maybe my vines are vigorous enough. > >> Best regards > >> Michael |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why mulch works.
Mulch shouldn't be put down over dry soil because it will cause the soil stay dry unless there is a heavy rain. This is why putting mulch over wet soil is the right thing to do. The mulch seals in the moisture already in the soil and regulates more moisture by soaking up heavy rain until the amount of rain oversaturates the mulch. Then the moisiture will start seeping in to the soil. On light rains the mulch will absorb the moisture and actually evaporate it when it starts raining. Meanwhile the mositure underneath the mulch is preserved so the roots can get to the nutrients. Since vines need very litle nutirents most mulched soils provide the nutrients for a healthy vine without provinding too much moisture or nutrients for over vigor. Mulch also provides an environment where the vine uses what it needs when it needs it not when it rains or when fertilizer is put down. Mulch also breaks down and provides a natural way for the vines to be healthy and allow the vines to progress physiologically on the vines time table. So as you can see mulching vines are healthy for the vines along with possibly restraining vigor when it rains hard. ,On Sep 3, 10:24*am, wrote: > " The thing(s) that increase > brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days." > > That is not true. If what you say is true than growing a vine in the > sahara desert would yield the best grapes. > > "You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell them > of > > > your 2 brix increase revelation. " > > Most viticulturists are like you, they claim that grape vines grow > better with no water. Maybe that is why the Fench only have "vintage > years" every 20 years or so. > > "Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial > > > growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor." > > And I'm sure they also fertilize. If they put their mouths were their > money was they wouldn't feritlize. BTW, fertilizer is USELESS if there > is no water in the soil for the roots to soak it up which blows away > your theory about vines growing well in "arid" regions. While grapes > roots do go deep a good percentage of them are near the surface. > > "You will also find many references in the literature that state > grapes do no > > > like wet feet" > > They don't like wet feet. What they like is well drained soil which by > design dries out FAST. That is why mulching over optimum soil is the > RIGHT thing to do. > > " > > On Sep 3, 8:43*am, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > > > > > wrote: > > > Micheal, > > > > Always trust your eyes and keep observing. > > > The very best thing for Michael to do is an experiment where he mulches a > > row or rows and leaves the others unmulched and see if he gets the "2 brix" > > increase on the mulched rows that you claim. The thing(s) that increase > > brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days. *Perhaps the only > > thing Michael can do is cut down trees or other obstacles obstructing > > sunlight. > > > You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell them of > > your 2 brix increase revelation. *I am sure you could start a new trend in > > grape growing. > > > You never did answer my question that I asked in the past; where are you > > growing your grapes and what are you growing? > > > > Paul, without any proof, is > > > saying that what I have observed and what you have have observed > > > couldn't be true. > > > Paul at least uses his real name. > > > I am saying that I have no doubt that mulching will increase vigor. > > Increased vigor in an already vigorous situation will NOT improve grape > > quality. *In fact, it will do just the opposite. Do you like your wine to > > smell and taste like vegetables? *Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial > > growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor. > > > > It sounds like in your case, mulching has helped > > > tremendously. There are many reasons for mulch and the main reason is > > > that a healthy vine is a good vine. It's as simple as that. > > > The French say that the best wine is made from the struggling vine. *Hmmm, > > something to think about there, doublesb. > > > You will also find many references in the literature that state grapes do no > > like wet feet. *Grape vine roots can go VERY deep; *deeper than almost all > > other plants. *You can not compare the root system of other shallow rooted > > plants to grape vines. *Promoting a shallow root system is not a good thing > > to do for grape vines. *Also consider where Vitis Vinifera originated - NOT > > in parts of the world that had vigorous growth. Also, it is most > > successfully grown - in semi arid areas. > > > >> On 3 Sep, 02:50, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > > > >> > michael wrote: > > >> > > On 30 Aug, 02:17, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > > >> > >> wrote: > > >> > >> > "I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > > >> > >> > ripening fruit." > > > >> > >> > "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > > >> > >> > to help ripening." > > > >> > >> > I think you had the right idea in the first comment. Pulling > > >> > >> > leaves doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will delay it. The vine > > >> > >> > takes time to readjust it's physiology to compensate for the lost > > >> > >> > leaves. In an environment like yours you need alent from *the > > >> > >> > leaves you can get. People who grow grapes in California or an > > >> > >> > area with more sunshine and heat have much more room to hack up > > >> > >> > the vines, you don't. > > > >> > >> Here is an excellent article on the subject. > > >> > >> Most of this research supports doublesb's previous comments but also > > >> > >> note the authors comments about situations of extreme vigor. > > > >> > >>http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=...e&dataId=10457 > > > >> > >> Paul > > > >> > >> >> On Aug 28, 8:36*am, michael > wrote: > > >> > >> >> I received some very interesting advice a month or two > > >> > >> >> ago,concerning the thinning of vertical shoots for grapes trained > > >> > >> >> in the Double Guyot method.I pruned the sidehoots to one or two > > >> > >> >> leaves earlier when the canopy was in full growth,and since the > > >> > >> >> beginning of August have left more on.I removed some lower leaves > > >> > >> >> just before netting a few days ago to help ripening. > > >> > >> >> I have an excellent crop this year,which seems to be ripening > > >> > >> >> well.My mini vineyard is in Herefordshire,England,and we have to > > >> > >> >> be satisfied with Brix values maximising at about 18 for reds or > > >> > >> >> whites.However one of my reds is already at 14.0,a couple of > > >> > >> >> weeks before harvest,which will be early this year in England.Our > > >> > >> >> temperatures have not been great in the daytime at 20-22C,but the > > >> > >> >> night time temperatures have not fallen below 15C.I live about > > >> > >> >> 120 miles from my vines,so have to make a judgement when to > > >> > >> >> visit.The average temperature (24hr average) at present is about > > >> > >> >> 15C,and I am wondering if anyone uses a rule of thumb to estimate > > >> > >> >> the increase in Brix/day for a given average(24hr) temperature. > > > >> > >> >> I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > > >> > >> >> ripening fruit.We have a large damson tree in our garden,which > > >> > >> >> produces a good crop of sweet damsons each year.This year there > > >> > >> >> has been an enormous crop (twice or three times normal),and they > > >> > >> >> have all fallen now,but with none of them ripe.I assume that this > > >> > >> >> is the same with vines.The balance of leaf to fruit is > > >> > >> >> crucial,and with a large crop,it is important to maintain a > > >> > >> >> maximum leaf area,consistent with keeping protection against > > >> > >> >> powdery mildew-good air flow and spray coverage. > > > >> > >> >> I have also for the first time put on a three inch layer of > > >> > >> >> garden compost around each vine in the early spring period.I had > > >> > >> >> not done this previously,since I thought the vines were vigorous > > >> > >> >> enough in our cool climate.However,although the vigour has > > >> > >> >> increased somewhat further,the vines look incredibly healthy,with > > >> > >> >> little powdery mildew, and I had a very good flower set.I think > > >> > >> >> the compost keeps the soil more moist,thus avoiding a major > > >> > >> >> powdery mildew attack in very dry spells. > > > >> > >> >> Michael- Hide quoted text - > > > >> > >> - Show quoted text - > > > >> > > Thanks for those comments. > > > >> > > The article you gave,Paul, is extremely interesting,and seems to deal > > >> > > exactly with my problems.I will study the article in more detail,but > > >> > > the comments on timing of removal of laterals seem to suggest that it > > >> > > is best to remove (or prune to three leaves) most of *these during > > >> > > the early flowering and fruit set period,but leave them after > > >> > > veraison into the ripening phase.I think this is something like my > > >> > > practice.I find that I have to remove the laterals in June,otherwise > > >> > > the canopy becomes a completely tangled mess (especially this year > > >> > > after using compost)-but this is the period of flowering and > > >> > > fruitset,so presumably fine.Later from mid August,the vigour of the > > >> > > canopy slows down,and more laterals can be left.However I still find > > >> > > myself hedging the top of the canopy,which creates new growth > > >> > > rapidly-if I do not do this the canopy can become unstable in quite > > >> > > light winds we have in September/October. > > > >> > > I was also very interested in the comment from doubi...,that using > > >> > > compost can add 2 Brix to the juice.I have certainly noted how much > > >> > > healthier my vines are this year-and more vigorous!! *I have use > > >> > > garden compost plus some added fish blood and bone.Is it sensible to > > >> > > add compost each year,and in your experience,when is the best time to > > >> > > add it? > > > >> > > Thanks again,Michael > > > >> > I seriously doubt than adding compost will add 2 brix. *I would like to > > >> > see doubi, or whatever his name actually is, point us to a literature > > >> > cite. > > > >> > This flies in the face of research that indicates that when you already > > >> > have vigorous growth, you do not further your problem. *I think most > > >> > research would indicate that increased vegetative growth has a negative > > >> > effect on grape berry maturity. > > > >> > In my opinion and experience, adding brix is done by increasing growing > > >> > degree days, hours of sunlight or cropping your vines so that you do > > >> > not over crop.- Hide quoted text - > > > >> > - Show quoted text - > > > >> Hi again, > > >> Does the ripening process depend on hours of sunlight > > >> or degree-days.This year my vines are cropping earlier than > > >> normal.There is also a very heavy crop,probably due to the excellent > > >> very warm June we had here.Since June the weather here has been > > >> mediocre during the day with average or slightly below average > > >> temperatures.However the overnight temperatures have been very > > >> consistently in the 14-17C minimum range ,which is well above average > > >> for England.So I am postulating > > ... > > read more » |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael,
BTW, a healthy vine is more resistant to fungus than a vine that has been "made to "struggle". Another reason to mulch and may be a reason why you have little powdery mildew problems this year. On Sep 3, 10:55*am, wrote: > Why mulch works. > > Mulch shouldn't be put down over dry soil because it will cause the > soil stay dry unless there is a heavy rain. This is why putting mulch > over wet soil is the right thing to do. The mulch seals in the > moisture already in the soil and regulates more moisture by soaking up > heavy rain until the amount of rain oversaturates the mulch. Then the > moisiture will start seeping in to the soil. On light rains the mulch > will absorb the moisture and actually evaporate it when it starts > raining. Meanwhile the mositure underneath the mulch is preserved so > the roots can get to the nutrients. Since vines need very litle > nutirents most mulched soils provide the nutrients for a healthy vine > without provinding too much moisture or nutrients for over vigor. > Mulch also provides an environment where the vine uses what it needs > when it needs it not when it rains or when fertilizer is put down. > Mulch also breaks down and provides a natural way for the vines to be > healthy and allow the vines to progress physiologically on the vines > time table. So as you can see mulching vines are healthy for the vines > along with possibly restraining vigor when it rains hard. > > ,On Sep 3, 10:24*am, wrote: > > > > > " The thing(s) that increase > > brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days." > > > That is not true. If what you say is true than growing a vine in the > > sahara desert would yield the best grapes. > > > "You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell them > > of > > > > your 2 brix increase revelation. " > > > Most viticulturists are like you, they claim that grape vines grow > > better with no water. Maybe that is why the Fench only have "vintage > > years" every 20 years or so. > > > "Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial > > > > growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor." > > > And I'm sure they also fertilize. If they put their mouths were their > > money was they wouldn't feritlize. BTW, fertilizer is USELESS if there > > is no water in the soil for the roots to soak it up which blows away > > your theory about vines growing well in "arid" regions. While grapes > > roots do go deep a good percentage of them are near the surface. > > > "You will also find many references in the literature that state > > grapes do no > > > > like wet feet" > > > They don't like wet feet. What they like is well drained soil which by > > design dries out FAST. That is why mulching over optimum soil is the > > RIGHT thing to do. > > > " > > > On Sep 3, 8:43*am, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > > > > wrote: > > > > Micheal, > > > > > Always trust your eyes and keep observing. > > > > The very best thing for Michael to do is an experiment where he mulches a > > > row or rows and leaves the others unmulched and see if he gets the "2 brix" > > > increase on the mulched rows that you claim. The thing(s) that increase > > > brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days. *Perhaps the only > > > thing Michael can do is cut down trees or other obstacles obstructing > > > sunlight. > > > > You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell them of > > > your 2 brix increase revelation. *I am sure you could start a new trend in > > > grape growing. > > > > You never did answer my question that I asked in the past; where are you > > > growing your grapes and what are you growing? > > > > > Paul, without any proof, is > > > > saying that what I have observed and what you have have observed > > > > couldn't be true. > > > > Paul at least uses his real name. > > > > I am saying that I have no doubt that mulching will increase vigor. > > > Increased vigor in an already vigorous situation will NOT improve grape > > > quality. *In fact, it will do just the opposite. Do you like your wine to > > > smell and taste like vegetables? *Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial > > > growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor. > > > > > It sounds like in your case, mulching has helped > > > > tremendously. There are many reasons for mulch and the main reason is > > > > that a healthy vine is a good vine. It's as simple as that. > > > > The French say that the best wine is made from the struggling vine. *Hmmm, > > > something to think about there, doublesb. > > > > You will also find many references in the literature that state grapes do no > > > like wet feet. *Grape vine roots can go VERY deep; *deeper than almost all > > > other plants. *You can not compare the root system of other shallow rooted > > > plants to grape vines. *Promoting a shallow root system is not a good thing > > > to do for grape vines. *Also consider where Vitis Vinifera originated - NOT > > > in parts of the world that had vigorous growth. Also, it is most > > > successfully grown - in semi arid areas. > > > > >> On 3 Sep, 02:50, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > > > > >> > michael wrote: > > > >> > > On 30 Aug, 02:17, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > > > >> > >> wrote: > > > >> > >> > "I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > > > >> > >> > ripening fruit." > > > > >> > >> > "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > > > >> > >> > to help ripening." > > > > >> > >> > I think you had the right idea in the first comment. Pulling > > > >> > >> > leaves doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will delay it. The vine > > > >> > >> > takes time to readjust it's physiology to compensate for the lost > > > >> > >> > leaves. In an environment like yours you need alent from *the > > > >> > >> > leaves you can get. People who grow grapes in California or an > > > >> > >> > area with more sunshine and heat have much more room to hack up > > > >> > >> > the vines, you don't. > > > > >> > >> Here is an excellent article on the subject. > > > >> > >> Most of this research supports doublesb's previous comments but also > > > >> > >> note the authors comments about situations of extreme vigor. > > > > >> > >>http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=...e&dataId=10457 > > > > >> > >> Paul > > > > >> > >> >> On Aug 28, 8:36*am, michael > wrote: > > > >> > >> >> I received some very interesting advice a month or two > > > >> > >> >> ago,concerning the thinning of vertical shoots for grapes trained > > > >> > >> >> in the Double Guyot method.I pruned the sidehoots to one or two > > > >> > >> >> leaves earlier when the canopy was in full growth,and since the > > > >> > >> >> beginning of August have left more on.I removed some lower leaves > > > >> > >> >> just before netting a few days ago to help ripening. > > > >> > >> >> I have an excellent crop this year,which seems to be ripening > > > >> > >> >> well.My mini vineyard is in Herefordshire,England,and we have to > > > >> > >> >> be satisfied with Brix values maximising at about 18 for reds or > > > >> > >> >> whites.However one of my reds is already at 14.0,a couple of > > > >> > >> >> weeks before harvest,which will be early this year in England.Our > > > >> > >> >> temperatures have not been great in the daytime at 20-22C,but the > > > >> > >> >> night time temperatures have not fallen below 15C.I live about > > > >> > >> >> 120 miles from my vines,so have to make a judgement when to > > > >> > >> >> visit.The average temperature (24hr average) at present is about > > > >> > >> >> 15C,and I am wondering if anyone uses a rule of thumb to estimate > > > >> > >> >> the increase in Brix/day for a given average(24hr) temperature. > > > > >> > >> >> I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area in > > > >> > >> >> ripening fruit.We have a large damson tree in our garden,which > > > >> > >> >> produces a good crop of sweet damsons each year.This year there > > > >> > >> >> has been an enormous crop (twice or three times normal),and they > > > >> > >> >> have all fallen now,but with none of them ripe.I assume that this > > > >> > >> >> is the same with vines.The balance of leaf to fruit is > > > >> > >> >> crucial,and with a large crop,it is important to maintain a > > > >> > >> >> maximum leaf area,consistent with keeping protection against > > > >> > >> >> powdery mildew-good air flow and spray coverage. > > > > >> > >> >> I have also for the first time put on a three inch layer of > > > >> > >> >> garden compost around each vine in the early spring period..I had > > > >> > >> >> not done this previously,since I thought the vines were vigorous > > > >> > >> >> enough in our cool climate.However,although the vigour has > > > >> > >> >> increased somewhat further,the vines look incredibly healthy,with > > > >> > >> >> little powdery mildew, and I had a very good flower set.I think > > > >> > >> >> the compost keeps the soil more moist,thus avoiding a major > > > >> > >> >> powdery mildew attack in very dry spells. > > > > >> > >> >> Michael- Hide quoted text - > > > > >> > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > >> > > Thanks for those comments. > > > > >> > > The article you gave,Paul, is extremely interesting,and seems to deal > > > >> > > exactly with my problems.I will study the article in more detail,but > > > >> > > the comments on timing of removal of laterals seem to suggest that it > > > >> > > is best to remove (or prune to three leaves) most of *these during > > > >> > > the early flowering and fruit set period,but leave them after > > > >> > > veraison into the ripening phase.I think this is something like my > > > >> > > practice.I find that I have to remove the laterals in June,otherwise > > > >> > > the canopy becomes a completely tangled mess (especially this year > > > >> > > after using compost)-but this is the period of flowering and > > > >> > > fruitset,so presumably fine.Later from mid August,the vigour of the > > > >> > > canopy slows down,and more laterals can be left.However I still find > > > >> > > myself hedging the top of the canopy,which creates new growth > > > >> > > rapidly-if I do not do this the canopy can become unstable in quite > > > >> > > light winds we have in September/October. > > > > >> > > I was also very interested in the comment from doubi...,that using > > > >> > > compost can add 2 Brix to the juice.I have certainly noted > > ... > > read more » |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
> " The thing(s) that increase > brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days." > > That is not true. If what you say is true than growing a vine in the > sahara desert would yield the best grapes. I see, you STILL refuse to state your name and where you live and grow grapes and which varieties you grow. Ever see an oasis in the desert? Plants there do very well with just a little water. The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water - sort of like fine tuning an IV for a Human in the hospital. Drip irrigation is usually cut off or reduced to promote better ripening near harvest time. In your theory, you would give them all the water they wanted. The result would be extremely long canes with poor fruit. Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as there is ample sun and water. Grapes are genetically coded to be climbers and reach for the sun. When water is reduced, the grape vine will stop sending energy to the shoot growth and instead put its energy into maturing the seeds and fruit to make it more likely birds and other animals will eat them, spread their seeds and perpetuate the species. This is the only thing nature cares about - perpetuating the species. > > "You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell them > of >> your 2 brix increase revelation. " > > Most viticulturists are like you, they claim that grape vines grow > better with no water. Maybe that is why the Fench only have "vintage > years" every 20 years or so. Tell it to the French. Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. I suppose you disagree with this also. Publish. and have your work peer reviewed. Most research viticulturists would welcome your documented research. Paul > > "Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial >> growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor." > > And I'm sure they also fertilize. NO!! most do not fertilize. > If they put their mouths were their > money was they wouldn't feritlize. They don't. > BTW, fertilizer is USELESS if there > is no water in the soil for the roots to soak it up which blows away > your theory about vines growing well in "arid" regions. The proof is well established. I think you live in California, right? What is the climate in most of the vineyards there? What is the climate in Washington State where grapes are grown. What is the climate in Argentina and Chile where grapes are grown. Vitis Vinifera originated in Eurasia near the Caspian and Black Sea - hardly a tropical paradise. > While grapes > roots do go deep a good percentage of them are near the surface. Yep, if you water them, you will have a good amount of them near the surface. > > "You will also find many references in the literature that state > grapes do no >> like wet feet" > > They don't like wet feet. What they like is well drained soil which by > design dries out FAST. That is why mulching over optimum soil is the > RIGHT thing to do. Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard differently in different rows and compare. > > " > > > On Sep 3, 8:43Â*am, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: >> wrote: >> > Micheal, >> >> > Always trust your eyes and keep observing. >> >> The very best thing for Michael to do is an experiment where he mulches a >> row or rows and leaves the others unmulched and see if he gets the "2 >> brix" increase on the mulched rows that you claim. The thing(s) that >> increase brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days. Â*Perhaps >> the only thing Michael can do is cut down trees or other obstacles >> obstructing sunlight. >> >> You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell them of >> your 2 brix increase revelation. Â*I am sure you could start a new trend >> in grape growing. >> >> You never did answer my question that I asked in the past; where are you >> growing your grapes and what are you growing? >> >> > Paul, without any proof, is >> > saying that what I have observed and what you have have observed >> > couldn't be true. >> >> Paul at least uses his real name. >> >> I am saying that I have no doubt that mulching will increase vigor. >> Increased vigor in an already vigorous situation will NOT improve grape >> quality. Â*In fact, it will do just the opposite. Do you like your wine to >> smell and taste like vegetables? Â*Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial >> growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor. >> >> > It sounds like in your case, mulching has helped >> > tremendously. There are many reasons for mulch and the main reason is >> > that a healthy vine is a good vine. It's as simple as that. >> >> The French say that the best wine is made from the struggling vine. >> Hmmm, something to think about there, doublesb. >> >> You will also find many references in the literature that state grapes do >> no like wet feet. Â*Grape vine roots can go VERY deep; Â*deeper than almost >> all other plants. Â*You can not compare the root system of other shallow >> rooted plants to grape vines. Â*Promoting a shallow root system is not a >> good thing to do for grape vines. Â*Also consider where Vitis Vinifera >> originated - NOT in parts of the world that had vigorous growth. Also, it >> is most successfully grown - in semi arid areas. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 3 Sep, 02:50, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: >> >> >> > michael wrote: >> >> > > On 30 Aug, 02:17, "Paul E. Lehmann" > >> >> > > wrote: >> >> > >> wrote: >> >> > >> > "I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area >> >> > >> > in ripening fruit." >> >> >> > >> > "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago >> >> > >> > to help ripening." >> >> >> > >> > I think you had the right idea in the first comment. Pulling >> >> > >> > leaves doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will delay it. The >> >> > >> > vine takes time to readjust it's physiology to compensate for >> >> > >> > the lost leaves. In an environment like yours you need alent >> >> > >> > from Â*the leaves you can get. People who grow grapes in >> >> > >> > California or an area with more sunshine and heat have much >> >> > >> > more room to hack up the vines, you don't. >> >> >> > >> Here is an excellent article on the subject. >> >> > >> Most of this research supports doublesb's previous comments but >> >> > >> also note the authors comments about situations of extreme vigor. >> >> >> > >>http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=...e&dataId=10457 >> >> >> > >> Paul >> >> >> > >> >> On Aug 28, 8:36Â*am, michael > >> >> > >> >> wrote: I received some very interesting advice a month or two >> >> > >> >> ago,concerning the thinning of vertical shoots for grapes >> >> > >> >> trained in the Double Guyot method.I pruned the sidehoots to >> >> > >> >> one or two leaves earlier when the canopy was in full >> >> > >> >> growth,and since the beginning of August have left more on.I >> >> > >> >> removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago >> >> > >> >> to help ripening. I have an excellent crop this year,which >> >> > >> >> seems to be ripening well.My mini vineyard is in >> >> > >> >> Herefordshire,England,and we have to be satisfied with Brix >> >> > >> >> values maximising at about 18 for reds or whites.However one >> >> > >> >> of my reds is already at 14.0,a couple of weeks before >> >> > >> >> harvest,which will be early this year in England.Our >> >> > >> >> temperatures have not been great in the daytime at 20-22C,but >> >> > >> >> the night time temperatures have not fallen below 15C.I live >> >> > >> >> about 120 miles from my vines,so have to make a judgement when >> >> > >> >> to visit.The average temperature (24hr average) at present is >> >> > >> >> about 15C,and I am wondering if anyone uses a rule of thumb to >> >> > >> >> estimate the increase in Brix/day for a given average(24hr) >> >> > >> >> temperature. >> >> >> > >> >> I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area >> >> > >> >> in ripening fruit.We have a large damson tree in our >> >> > >> >> garden,which produces a good crop of sweet damsons each >> >> > >> >> year.This year there has been an enormous crop (twice or three >> >> > >> >> times normal),and they have all fallen now,but with none of >> >> > >> >> them ripe.I assume that this is the same with vines.The >> >> > >> >> balance of leaf to fruit is crucial,and with a large crop,it >> >> > >> >> is important to maintain a maximum leaf area,consistent with >> >> > >> >> keeping protection against powdery mildew-good air flow and >> >> > >> >> spray coverage. >> >> >> > >> >> I have also for the first time put on a three inch layer of >> >> > >> >> garden compost around each vine in the early spring period.I >> >> > >> >> had not done this previously,since I thought the vines were >> >> > >> >> vigorous enough in our cool climate.However,although the >> >> > >> >> vigour has increased somewhat further,the vines look >> >> > >> >> incredibly healthy,with little powdery mildew, and I had a >> >> > >> >> very good flower set.I think the compost keeps the soil more >> >> > >> >> moist,thus avoiding a major powdery mildew attack in very dry >> >> > >> >> spells. >> >> >> > >> >> Michael- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> > >> - Show quoted text - >> >> >> > > Thanks for those comments. >> >> >> > > The article you gave,Paul, is extremely interesting,and seems to >> >> > > deal exactly with my problems.I will study the article in more >> >> > > detail,but the comments on timing of removal of laterals seem to >> >> > > suggest that it is best to remove (or prune to three leaves) most >> >> > > of Â*these during the early flowering and fruit set period,but >> >> > > leave them after veraison into the ripening phase.I think this is >> >> > > something like my practice.I find that I have to remove the >> >> > > laterals in June,otherwise the canopy becomes a completely tangled >> >> > > mess (especially this year after using compost)-but this is the >> >> > > period of flowering and fruitset,so presumably fine.Later from mid >> >> > > August,the vigour of the canopy slows down,and more laterals can >> >> > > be left.However I still find myself hedging the top of the >> >> > > canopy,which creates new growth rapidly-if I do not do this the >> >> > > canopy can become unstable in quite light winds we have in >> >> > > September/October. >> >> >> > > I was also very interested in the comment from doubi...,that using >> >> > > compost can add 2 Brix to the juice.I have certainly noted how >> >> > > much healthier my vines are this year-and more vigorous!! Â*I have >> >> > > use garden compost plus some added fish blood and bone.Is it >> >> > > sensible to add compost each year,and in your experience,when is >> >> > > the best time to add it? >> >> >> > > Thanks again,Michael >> >> >> > I seriously doubt than adding compost will add 2 brix. Â*I would like >> >> > to see doubi, or whatever his name actually is, point us to a >> >> > literature cite. >> >> >> > This flies in the face of research that indicates that when you >> >> > already have vigorous growth, you do not further your problem. Â*I >> >> > think most research would indicate that increased vegetative growth >> >> > has a negative effect on grape berry maturity. >> >> >> > In my opinion and experience, adding brix is done by increasing >> >> > growing degree days, hours of sunlight or cropping your vines so >> >> > that you do not over crop.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> > - Show quoted text - >> >> >> Hi again, >> >> Does the ripening process depend on hours of sunlight >> >> or degree-days.This year my vines are cropping earlier than >> >> normal.There is also a very heavy crop,probably due to the excellent >> >> very warm June we had here.Since June the weather here has been >> >> mediocre during the day with average or slightly below average >> >> temperatures.However the overnight temperatures have been very >> >> consistently in the 14-17C minimum range ,which is well above average >> >> for England.So I am postulating that it is the number of degree-days >> >> (above 10C I think) over a 24 hr period which is ripening my grapes >> >> early.There certainly has been a shortage of sunshine this year. >> >> On the compost question,I thought that it was always useful to add >> >> compost around the vine (maybe without any added fertiliser >> >> annually),to avoid the vines roots drying out during a very dry >> >> spell,which would encourage powdery mildew.My vines are on a s-facing >> >> slope on dry limestone soil,so always have a tendency to dry out. >> >> Several books on vineyard management do encourage the use of >> >> compost,but maybe my vines are vigorous enough. >> >> Best regards >> >> Michael |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard differently
in different rows and compare" He did, and he seems happy with mulch. Your the one who doesn't accept his observations. "The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water " If they mulched they wouldn't need irrigation. "Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as there is ample sun and water. " So they do need water? "Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. *I suppose you disagree with this also." I wrote that mulch actually refrains vigor ( due to it absorbing the water) while increasing the health of the vine.. "Publish. and have your work peer reviewed." It's already been done. Grapes are plants. They benefit from mulching. On Sep 3, 4:07*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > wrote: > > " The thing(s) that increase > > brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days." > > > That is not true. If what you say is true than growing a vine in the > > sahara desert would yield the best grapes. > > I see, you STILL refuse to state your name and where you live and grow > grapes and which varieties you grow. > > Ever see an oasis in the desert? *Plants there do very well with just a > little water. > > The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is > regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water - sort of > like fine tuning an IV for a Human in the hospital. Drip irrigation is > usually cut off or reduced to promote better ripening near harvest time. > In your theory, you would give them all the water they wanted. *The result > would be extremely long canes with poor fruit. > > Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as there > is ample sun and water. Grapes are genetically coded to be climbers and > reach for the sun. *When water is reduced, the grape vine will stop sending > energy to the shoot growth and instead put its energy into maturing the > seeds and fruit to make it more likely birds and other animals will eat > them, spread their seeds and perpetuate the species. *This is the only > thing nature cares about - perpetuating the species. > > > > > "You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell them > > of > >> your 2 brix increase revelation. " > > > Most viticulturists are like you, they claim that grape vines grow > > better with no water. Maybe that is why the Fench only have "vintage > > years" every 20 years or so. > > Tell it to the French. > > Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. *I suppose you disagree with > this also. > > Publish. and have your work peer reviewed. *Most research viticulturists > would welcome your documented research. > > Paul > > > > > "Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial > >> growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor." > > > And I'm sure they also fertilize. > > NO!! most do not fertilize. > > > If they put their mouths were their > > money was they wouldn't feritlize. > > They don't. > > > BTW, fertilizer is USELESS if there > > is no water in the soil for the roots to soak it up which blows away > > your theory about vines growing well in "arid" regions. > > The proof is well established. *I think you live in California, right? > What is the climate in most of the vineyards there? *What is the climate in > Washington State where grapes are grown. *What is the climate in Argentina > and Chile where grapes are grown. *Vitis Vinifera originated in Eurasia > near the Caspian and Black Sea - hardly a tropical paradise. > > > While grapes > > roots do go deep a good percentage of them are near the surface. > > Yep, if you water them, you will have a good amount of them near the > surface. > > > > > "You will also find many references in the literature that state > > grapes do no > >> like wet feet" > > > They don't like wet feet. What they like is well drained soil which by > > design dries out FAST. That is why mulching over optimum soil is the > > RIGHT thing to do. > > Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard differently in > different rows and compare. > > > > > > > " > > > On Sep 3, 8:43*am, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > >> wrote: > >> > Micheal, > > >> > Always trust your eyes and keep observing. > > >> The very best thing for Michael to do is an experiment where he mulches a > >> row or rows and leaves the others unmulched and see if he gets the "2 > >> brix" increase on the mulched rows that you claim. The thing(s) that > >> increase brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days. *Perhaps > >> the only thing Michael can do is cut down trees or other obstacles > >> obstructing sunlight. > > >> You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell them of > >> your 2 brix increase revelation. *I am sure you could start a new trend > >> in grape growing. > > >> You never did answer my question that I asked in the past; where are you > >> growing your grapes and what are you growing? > > >> > Paul, without any proof, is > >> > saying that what I have observed and what you have have observed > >> > couldn't be true. > > >> Paul at least uses his real name. > > >> I am saying that I have no doubt that mulching will increase vigor. > >> Increased vigor in an already vigorous situation will NOT improve grape > >> quality. *In fact, it will do just the opposite. Do you like your wine to > >> smell and taste like vegetables? *Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial > >> growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor. > > >> > It sounds like in your case, mulching has helped > >> > tremendously. There are many reasons for mulch and the main reason is > >> > that a healthy vine is a good vine. It's as simple as that. > > >> The French say that the best wine is made from the struggling vine. > >> Hmmm, something to think about there, doublesb. > > >> You will also find many references in the literature that state grapes do > >> no like wet feet. *Grape vine roots can go VERY deep; *deeper than almost > >> all other plants. *You can not compare the root system of other shallow > >> rooted plants to grape vines. *Promoting a shallow root system is not a > >> good thing to do for grape vines. *Also consider where Vitis Vinifera > >> originated - NOT in parts of the world that had vigorous growth. Also, it > >> is most successfully grown - in semi arid areas. > > >> >> On 3 Sep, 02:50, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > > >> >> > michael wrote: > >> >> > > On 30 Aug, 02:17, "Paul E. Lehmann" > > >> >> > > wrote: > >> >> > >> wrote: > >> >> > >> > "I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area > >> >> > >> > in ripening fruit." > > >> >> > >> > "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > >> >> > >> > to help ripening." > > >> >> > >> > I think you had the right idea in the first comment. Pulling > >> >> > >> > leaves doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will delay it. The > >> >> > >> > vine takes time to readjust it's physiology to compensate for > >> >> > >> > the lost leaves. In an environment like yours you need alent > >> >> > >> > from *the leaves you can get. People who grow grapes in > >> >> > >> > California or an area with more sunshine and heat have much > >> >> > >> > more room to hack up the vines, you don't. > > >> >> > >> Here is an excellent article on the subject. > >> >> > >> Most of this research supports doublesb's previous comments but > >> >> > >> also note the authors comments about situations of extreme vigor. > > >> >> > >>http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=...e&dataId=10457 > > >> >> > >> Paul > > >> >> > >> >> On Aug 28, 8:36*am, michael > > >> >> > >> >> wrote: I received some very interesting advice a month or two > >> >> > >> >> ago,concerning the thinning of vertical shoots for grapes > >> >> > >> >> trained in the Double Guyot method.I pruned the sidehoots to > >> >> > >> >> one or two leaves earlier when the canopy was in full > >> >> > >> >> growth,and since the beginning of August have left more on.I > >> >> > >> >> removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days ago > >> >> > >> >> to help ripening. I have an excellent crop this year,which > >> >> > >> >> seems to be ripening well.My mini vineyard is in > >> >> > >> >> Herefordshire,England,and we have to be satisfied with Brix > >> >> > >> >> values maximising at about 18 for reds or whites.However one > >> >> > >> >> of my reds is already at 14.0,a couple of weeks before > >> >> > >> >> harvest,which will be early this year in England.Our > >> >> > >> >> temperatures have not been great in the daytime at 20-22C,but > >> >> > >> >> the night time temperatures have not fallen below 15C.I live > >> >> > >> >> about 120 miles from my vines,so have to make a judgement when > >> >> > >> >> to visit.The average temperature (24hr average) at present is > >> >> > >> >> about 15C,and I am wondering if anyone uses a rule of thumb to > >> >> > >> >> estimate the increase in Brix/day for a given average(24hr) > >> >> > >> >> temperature. > > >> >> > >> >> I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf area > >> >> > >> >> in ripening fruit.We have a large damson tree in our > >> >> > >> >> garden,which produces a good crop of sweet damsons each > >> >> > >> >> year.This year there has been an enormous crop (twice or three > >> >> > >> >> times normal),and they have all fallen now,but with none of > >> >> > >> >> them ripe.I assume that this is the same with vines.The > >> >> > >> >> balance of leaf to fruit is crucial,and with a large crop,it > >> >> > >> >> is important to maintain a maximum leaf area,consistent with > >> >> > >> >> keeping protection against powdery mildew-good air flow and > >> >> > >> >> spray coverage. > > >> >> > >> >> I have also for the first time put on a three inch layer of > >> >> > >> >> garden compost around each vine in the early spring period.I > >> >> > >> >> had not done this previously,since I thought the vines were > >> >> > >> >> vigorous enough in our cool climate.However,although the > >> >> > >> >> vigour has increased somewhat further,the vines look > >> >> > >> >> incredibly healthy,with little powdery mildew, and I had a > >> >> > >> >> very good flower set.I think the compost keeps the soil more > >> >> > >> >> moist,thus avoiding a major powdery mildew attack in very dry > >> >> > >> >> spells. > > >> >> > >> >> Michael- Hide quoted text - > > >> >> > >> - Show quoted text - > > >> >> > > Thanks for those comments. > > >> >> > > The article you gave,Paul, is extremely interesting,and seems to > >> >> > > deal exactly with my problems.I will study the article in more > >> >> > > detail,but the comments on timing of removal of laterals seem to > >> >> > > suggest that it is best to remove (or prune to three leaves) most > >> >> > > of *these during the early flowering and fruit set period,but > >> >> > > leave them after veraison into the ripening phase.I think this is > >> >> > > something like > > ... > > read more » |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
> "Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard differently > in > different rows and compare" > > He did, and he seems happy with mulch. Your the one who doesn't accept > his observations. I am talking about a trial between rows in the same year!!! Not one year compared to another. Also, the crop is not yet in for this year. A vigorous vine does not mean the fruit is good. > > "The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is > regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water " > > If they mulched they wouldn't need irrigation. Try drinking wine instead of growing and smoking wacky weed your reasoning may be better. :-) > > "Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as > there > is ample sun and water. " > > So they do need water? Yes, but a LOT less than other fruits. Ever been to Grand Junction, Colorado, Moab Utah? Quite a desert environment there and they grow good fruit - WITHOUT MULCHING. > > "Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. Â*I suppose you disagree > with > this also." > > I wrote that mulch actually refrains vigor ( due to it absorbing the > water) while increasing the health of the vine.. > > "Publish. and have your work peer reviewed." > > It's already been done. Grapes are plants. They benefit from mulching. As I thought, you are afraid to publish in any magazine read by and contributed to by viticulturists. STILL no answer as to where you live and what you are growing. Afraid of this question? I am also not impressed that you hide behind an alias. Paul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 3, 4:07Â*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: >> wrote: >> > " The thing(s) that increase >> > brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days." >> >> > That is not true. If what you say is true than growing a vine in the >> > sahara desert would yield the best grapes. >> >> I see, you STILL refuse to state your name and where you live and grow >> grapes and which varieties you grow. >> >> Ever see an oasis in the desert? Â*Plants there do very well with just a >> little water. >> >> The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is >> regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water - sort >> of like fine tuning an IV for a Human in the hospital. Drip irrigation is >> usually cut off or reduced to promote better ripening near harvest time. >> In your theory, you would give them all the water they wanted. Â*The >> result would be extremely long canes with poor fruit. >> >> Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as >> there is ample sun and water. Grapes are genetically coded to be climbers >> and reach for the sun. Â*When water is reduced, the grape vine will stop >> sending energy to the shoot growth and instead put its energy into >> maturing the seeds and fruit to make it more likely birds and other >> animals will eat them, spread their seeds and perpetuate the species. >> This is the only thing nature cares about - perpetuating the species. >> >> >> >> > "You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell them >> > of >> >> your 2 brix increase revelation. " >> >> > Most viticulturists are like you, they claim that grape vines grow >> > better with no water. Maybe that is why the Fench only have "vintage >> > years" every 20 years or so. >> >> Tell it to the French. >> >> Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. Â*I suppose you disagree with >> this also. >> >> Publish. and have your work peer reviewed. Â*Most research viticulturists >> would welcome your documented research. >> >> Paul >> >> >> >> > "Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial >> >> growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor." >> >> > And I'm sure they also fertilize. >> >> NO!! most do not fertilize. >> >> > If they put their mouths were their >> > money was they wouldn't feritlize. >> >> They don't. >> >> > BTW, fertilizer is USELESS if there >> > is no water in the soil for the roots to soak it up which blows away >> > your theory about vines growing well in "arid" regions. >> >> The proof is well established. Â*I think you live in California, right? >> What is the climate in most of the vineyards there? Â*What is the climate >> in Washington State where grapes are grown. Â*What is the climate in >> Argentina and Chile where grapes are grown. Â*Vitis Vinifera originated in >> Eurasia near the Caspian and Black Sea - hardly a tropical paradise. >> >> > While grapes >> > roots do go deep a good percentage of them are near the surface. >> >> Yep, if you water them, you will have a good amount of them near the >> surface. >> >> >> >> > "You will also find many references in the literature that state >> > grapes do no >> >> like wet feet" >> >> > They don't like wet feet. What they like is well drained soil which by >> > design dries out FAST. That is why mulching over optimum soil is the >> > RIGHT thing to do. >> >> Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard differently in >> different rows and compare. >> >> >> >> >> >> > " >> >> > On Sep 3, 8:43Â*am, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: >> >> wrote: >> >> > Micheal, >> >> >> > Always trust your eyes and keep observing. >> >> >> The very best thing for Michael to do is an experiment where he >> >> mulches a row or rows and leaves the others unmulched and see if he >> >> gets the "2 brix" increase on the mulched rows that you claim. The >> >> thing(s) that increase brix are more sunlight and more growing degree >> >> days. Â*Perhaps the only thing Michael can do is cut down trees or >> >> other obstacles obstructing sunlight. >> >> >> You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell them >> >> of your 2 brix increase revelation. Â*I am sure you could start a new >> >> trend in grape growing. >> >> >> You never did answer my question that I asked in the past; where are >> >> you growing your grapes and what are you growing? >> >> >> > Paul, without any proof, is >> >> > saying that what I have observed and what you have have observed >> >> > couldn't be true. >> >> >> Paul at least uses his real name. >> >> >> I am saying that I have no doubt that mulching will increase vigor. >> >> Increased vigor in an already vigorous situation will NOT improve >> >> grape quality. Â*In fact, it will do just the opposite. Do you like >> >> your wine to smell and taste like vegetables? Â*Here in the Mid >> >> Atlantic, commercial growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor. >> >> >> > It sounds like in your case, mulching has helped >> >> > tremendously. There are many reasons for mulch and the main reason >> >> > is that a healthy vine is a good vine. It's as simple as that. >> >> >> The French say that the best wine is made from the struggling vine. >> >> Hmmm, something to think about there, doublesb. >> >> >> You will also find many references in the literature that state grapes >> >> do no like wet feet. Â*Grape vine roots can go VERY deep; Â*deeper than >> >> almost all other plants. Â*You can not compare the root system of other >> >> shallow rooted plants to grape vines. Â*Promoting a shallow root system >> >> is not a good thing to do for grape vines. Â*Also consider where Vitis >> >> Vinifera originated - NOT in parts of the world that had vigorous >> >> growth. Also, it is most successfully grown - in semi arid areas. >> >> >> >> On 3 Sep, 02:50, "Paul E. Lehmann" > >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > michael wrote: >> >> >> > > On 30 Aug, 02:17, "Paul E. Lehmann" > >> >> >> > > wrote: >> >> >> > >> wrote: >> >> >> > >> > "I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf >> >> >> > >> > area in ripening fruit." >> >> >> >> > >> > "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days >> >> >> > >> > ago to help ripening." >> >> >> >> > >> > I think you had the right idea in the first comment. Pulling >> >> >> > >> > leaves doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will delay it. The >> >> >> > >> > vine takes time to readjust it's physiology to compensate >> >> >> > >> > for the lost leaves. In an environment like yours you need >> >> >> > >> > alent from Â*the leaves you can get. People who grow grapes >> >> >> > >> > in California or an area with more sunshine and heat have >> >> >> > >> > much more room to hack up the vines, you don't. >> >> >> >> > >> Here is an excellent article on the subject. >> >> >> > >> Most of this research supports doublesb's previous comments >> >> >> > >> but also note the authors comments about situations of extreme >> >> >> > >> vigor. >> >> >> >> > >>http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=...e&dataId=10457 >> >> >> >> > >> Paul >> >> >> >> > >> >> On Aug 28, 8:36Â*am, michael > >> >> >> > >> >> wrote: I received some very interesting advice a month or >> >> >> > >> >> two ago,concerning the thinning of vertical shoots for >> >> >> > >> >> grapes trained in the Double Guyot method.I pruned the >> >> >> > >> >> sidehoots to one or two leaves earlier when the canopy was >> >> >> > >> >> in full growth,and since the beginning of August have left >> >> >> > >> >> more on.I removed some lower leaves just before netting a >> >> >> > >> >> few days ago to help ripening. I have an excellent crop >> >> >> > >> >> this year,which seems to be ripening well.My mini vineyard >> >> >> > >> >> is in Herefordshire,England,and we have to be satisfied >> >> >> > >> >> with Brix values maximising at about 18 for reds or >> >> >> > >> >> whites.However one of my reds is already at 14.0,a couple >> >> >> > >> >> of weeks before harvest,which will be early this year in >> >> >> > >> >> England.Our temperatures have not been great in the daytime >> >> >> > >> >> at 20-22C,but the night time temperatures have not fallen >> >> >> > >> >> below 15C.I live about 120 miles from my vines,so have to >> >> >> > >> >> make a judgement when to visit.The average temperature >> >> >> > >> >> (24hr average) at present is about 15C,and I am wondering >> >> >> > >> >> if anyone uses a rule of thumb to estimate the increase in >> >> >> > >> >> Brix/day for a given average(24hr) temperature. >> >> >> >> > >> >> I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf >> >> >> > >> >> area in ripening fruit.We have a large damson tree in our >> >> >> > >> >> garden,which produces a good crop of sweet damsons each >> >> >> > >> >> year.This year there has been an enormous crop (twice or >> >> >> > >> >> three times normal),and they have all fallen now,but with >> >> >> > >> >> none of them ripe.I assume that this is the same with >> >> >> > >> >> vines.The balance of leaf to fruit is crucial,and with a >> >> >> > >> >> large crop,it is important to maintain a maximum leaf >> >> >> > >> >> area,consistent with keeping protection against powdery >> >> >> > >> >> mildew-good air flow and spray coverage. >> >> >> >> > >> >> I have also for the first time put on a three inch layer of >> >> >> > >> >> garden compost around each vine in the early spring >> >> >> > >> >> period.I had not done this previously,since I thought the >> >> >> > >> >> vines were vigorous enough in our cool >> >> >> > >> >> climate.However,although the vigour has increased somewhat >> >> >> > >> >> further,the vines look incredibly healthy,with little >> >> >> > >> >> powdery mildew, and I had a very good flower set.I think >> >> >> > >> >> the compost keeps the soil more moist,thus avoiding a major >> >> >> > >> >> powdery mildew attack in very dry spells. >> >> >> >> > >> >> Michael- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> >> > >> - Show quoted text - >> >> >> >> > > Thanks for those comments. >> >> >> >> > > The article you gave,Paul, is extremely interesting,and seems >> >> >> > > to deal exactly with my problems.I will study the article in >> >> >> > > more detail,but the comments on timing of removal of laterals >> >> >> > > seem to suggest that it is best to remove (or prune to three >> >> >> > > leaves) most of Â*these during the early flowering and fruit set >> >> >> > > period,but leave them after veraison into the ripening phase.I >> >> >> > > think this is something like >> >> ... >> >> read more » |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul,
The more I read this statement, the more I laugh. ""The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is regulated by drip irrigation " So much for natural "terroir". BTW, the french are great winemakers but are average winegrowers. On Sep 3, 7:45*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > wrote: > > "Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard differently > > in > > *different rows and compare" > > > He did, and he seems happy with mulch. Your the one who doesn't accept > > his observations. > > I am talking about a trial between rows in the same year!!! > Not one year compared to another. * > Also, the crop is not yet in for this year. *A vigorous vine does not mean > the fruit is good. > > > > > "The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is > > *regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water " > > > If they mulched they wouldn't need irrigation. > > Try drinking wine instead of growing and smoking wacky weed your reasoning > may be better. :-) > > > > > "Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as > > there > > *is ample sun and water. " > > > So they do need water? > > Yes, but a LOT less than other fruits. *Ever been to Grand Junction, > Colorado, Moab Utah? *Quite a desert environment there and they grow good > fruit - WITHOUT MULCHING. > > > > > "Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. *I suppose you disagree > > with > > *this also." > > > I wrote that mulch actually refrains vigor ( due to it absorbing the > > water) while increasing the health of the vine.. > > > "Publish. and have your work peer reviewed." > > > It's already been done. Grapes are plants. They benefit from mulching. > > As I thought, you are afraid to publish in any magazine read by and > contributed to by viticulturists. > > STILL no answer as to where you live and what you are growing. *Afraid of > this question? *I am also not impressed that you hide behind an alias. > > Paul > > > > > > > On Sep 3, 4:07*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > >> wrote: > >> > " The thing(s) that increase > >> > brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days." > > >> > That is not true. If what you say is true than growing a vine in the > >> > sahara desert would yield the best grapes. > > >> I see, you STILL refuse to state your name and where you live and grow > >> grapes and which varieties you grow. > > >> Ever see an oasis in the desert? *Plants there do very well with just a > >> little water. > > >> The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is > >> regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water - sort > >> of like fine tuning an IV for a Human in the hospital. Drip irrigation is > >> usually cut off or reduced to promote better ripening near harvest time. > >> In your theory, you would give them all the water they wanted. *The > >> result would be extremely long canes with poor fruit. > > >> Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as > >> there is ample sun and water. Grapes are genetically coded to be climbers > >> and reach for the sun. *When water is reduced, the grape vine will stop > >> sending energy to the shoot growth and instead put its energy into > >> maturing the seeds and fruit to make it more likely birds and other > >> animals will eat them, spread their seeds and perpetuate the species. > >> This is the only thing nature cares about - perpetuating the species. > > >> > "You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell them > >> > of > >> >> your 2 brix increase revelation. " > > >> > Most viticulturists are like you, they claim that grape vines grow > >> > better with no water. Maybe that is why the Fench only have "vintage > >> > years" every 20 years or so. > > >> Tell it to the French. > > >> Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. *I suppose you disagree with > >> this also. > > >> Publish. and have your work peer reviewed. *Most research viticulturists > >> would welcome your documented research. > > >> Paul > > >> > "Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial > >> >> growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor." > > >> > And I'm sure they also fertilize. > > >> NO!! most do not fertilize. > > >> > If they put their mouths were their > >> > money was they wouldn't feritlize. > > >> They don't. > > >> > BTW, fertilizer is USELESS if there > >> > is no water in the soil for the roots to soak it up which blows away > >> > your theory about vines growing well in "arid" regions. > > >> The proof is well established. *I think you live in California, right? > >> What is the climate in most of the vineyards there? *What is the climate > >> in Washington State where grapes are grown. *What is the climate in > >> Argentina and Chile where grapes are grown. *Vitis Vinifera originated in > >> Eurasia near the Caspian and Black Sea - hardly a tropical paradise. > > >> > While grapes > >> > roots do go deep a good percentage of them are near the surface. > > >> Yep, if you water them, you will have a good amount of them near the > >> surface. > > >> > "You will also find many references in the literature that state > >> > grapes do no > >> >> like wet feet" > > >> > They don't like wet feet. What they like is well drained soil which by > >> > design dries out FAST. That is why mulching over optimum soil is the > >> > RIGHT thing to do. > > >> Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard differently in > >> different rows and compare. > > >> > " > > >> > On Sep 3, 8:43*am, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > Micheal, > > >> >> > Always trust your eyes and keep observing. > > >> >> The very best thing for Michael to do is an experiment where he > >> >> mulches a row or rows and leaves the others unmulched and see if he > >> >> gets the "2 brix" increase on the mulched rows that you claim. The > >> >> thing(s) that increase brix are more sunlight and more growing degree > >> >> days. *Perhaps the only thing Michael can do is cut down trees or > >> >> other obstacles obstructing sunlight. > > >> >> You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell them > >> >> of your 2 brix increase revelation. *I am sure you could start a new > >> >> trend in grape growing. > > >> >> You never did answer my question that I asked in the past; where are > >> >> you growing your grapes and what are you growing? > > >> >> > Paul, without any proof, is > >> >> > saying that what I have observed and what you have have observed > >> >> > couldn't be true. > > >> >> Paul at least uses his real name. > > >> >> I am saying that I have no doubt that mulching will increase vigor. > >> >> Increased vigor in an already vigorous situation will NOT improve > >> >> grape quality. *In fact, it will do just the opposite. Do you like > >> >> your wine to smell and taste like vegetables? *Here in the Mid > >> >> Atlantic, commercial growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor. > > >> >> > It sounds like in your case, mulching has helped > >> >> > tremendously. There are many reasons for mulch and the main reason > >> >> > is that a healthy vine is a good vine. It's as simple as that. > > >> >> The French say that the best wine is made from the struggling vine. > >> >> Hmmm, something to think about there, doublesb. > > >> >> You will also find many references in the literature that state grapes > >> >> do no like wet feet. *Grape vine roots can go VERY deep; *deeper than > >> >> almost all other plants. *You can not compare the root system of other > >> >> shallow rooted plants to grape vines. *Promoting a shallow root system > >> >> is not a good thing to do for grape vines. *Also consider where Vitis > >> >> Vinifera originated - NOT in parts of the world that had vigorous > >> >> growth. Also, it is most successfully grown - in semi arid areas. > > >> >> >> On 3 Sep, 02:50, "Paul E. Lehmann" > > >> >> >> wrote: > > >> >> >> > michael wrote: > >> >> >> > > On 30 Aug, 02:17, "Paul E. Lehmann" > > >> >> >> > > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> > "I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf > >> >> >> > >> > area in ripening fruit." > > >> >> >> > >> > "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days > >> >> >> > >> > ago to help ripening." > > >> >> >> > >> > I think you had the right idea in the first comment. Pulling > >> >> >> > >> > leaves doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will delay it. The > >> >> >> > >> > vine takes time to readjust it's physiology to compensate > >> >> >> > >> > for the lost leaves. In an environment like yours you need > >> >> >> > >> > alent from *the leaves you can get. People who grow grapes > >> >> >> > >> > in California or an area with more sunshine and heat have > >> >> >> > >> > much more room to hack up the vines, you don't. > > >> >> >> > >> Here is an excellent article on the subject. > >> >> >> > >> Most of this research supports doublesb's previous comments > >> >> >> > >> but also note the authors comments about situations of extreme > >> >> >> > >> vigor. > > >> >> >> > >>http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=...e&dataId=10457 > > >> >> >> > >> Paul > > >> >> >> > >> >> On Aug 28, 8:36*am, michael > > >> >> >> > >> >> wrote: I received some very interesting advice a month or > >> >> >> > >> >> two ago,concerning the thinning of vertical shoots for > >> >> >> > >> >> grapes trained in the Double Guyot method.I pruned the > >> >> >> > >> >> sidehoots to one or two leaves earlier when the canopy was > >> >> >> > >> >> in full growth,and since the beginning of August have left > >> >> >> > >> >> more on.I removed some lower leaves just before netting a > >> >> >> > >> >> few days ago to help ripening. I have an excellent crop > >> >> >> > >> >> this year,which seems to be ripening well.My mini vineyard > >> >> >> > >> >> is in Herefordshire,England,and we have to be satisfied > >> >> >> > >> >> with Brix values maximising at about 18 for reds or > >> >> >> > >> >> whites.However one of my reds is already at 14.0,a couple > >> >> >> > >> >> of weeks before harvest,which will be early this year in > >> >> >> > >> >> England.Our temperatures have not been great in the daytime > >> >> >> > >> >> at 20-22C,but the night time temperatures have not fallen > >> >> >> > >> >> below > > ... > > read more » |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"As I thought, you are afraid to publish in any magazine read by and
contributed to by viticulturists." Viticuluralists are off in orbit when it comes to farming. I've had enough experience with them to know they would never make it if they had to grow something that was actually hard to grow. They end up killing more vines than they cultivate. The main reason for it is that they all think that what works in Maryland will work in England and will pound the table trying to convince you. Your insistence that Michael couldn't possibly be seeing positive effects from mulch is par for the course. On Sep 3, 7:45*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > wrote: > > "Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard differently > > in > > *different rows and compare" > > > He did, and he seems happy with mulch. Your the one who doesn't accept > > his observations. > > I am talking about a trial between rows in the same year!!! > Not one year compared to another. * > Also, the crop is not yet in for this year. *A vigorous vine does not mean > the fruit is good. > > > > > "The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is > > *regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water " > > > If they mulched they wouldn't need irrigation. > > Try drinking wine instead of growing and smoking wacky weed your reasoning > may be better. :-) > > > > > "Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as > > there > > *is ample sun and water. " > > > So they do need water? > > Yes, but a LOT less than other fruits. *Ever been to Grand Junction, > Colorado, Moab Utah? *Quite a desert environment there and they grow good > fruit - WITHOUT MULCHING. > > > > > "Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. *I suppose you disagree > > with > > *this also." > > > I wrote that mulch actually refrains vigor ( due to it absorbing the > > water) while increasing the health of the vine.. > > > "Publish. and have your work peer reviewed." > > > It's already been done. Grapes are plants. They benefit from mulching. > > As I thought, you are afraid to publish in any magazine read by and > contributed to by viticulturists. > > STILL no answer as to where you live and what you are growing. *Afraid of > this question? *I am also not impressed that you hide behind an alias. > > Paul > > > > > > > On Sep 3, 4:07*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > >> wrote: > >> > " The thing(s) that increase > >> > brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days." > > >> > That is not true. If what you say is true than growing a vine in the > >> > sahara desert would yield the best grapes. > > >> I see, you STILL refuse to state your name and where you live and grow > >> grapes and which varieties you grow. > > >> Ever see an oasis in the desert? *Plants there do very well with just a > >> little water. > > >> The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is > >> regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water - sort > >> of like fine tuning an IV for a Human in the hospital. Drip irrigation is > >> usually cut off or reduced to promote better ripening near harvest time. > >> In your theory, you would give them all the water they wanted. *The > >> result would be extremely long canes with poor fruit. > > >> Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as > >> there is ample sun and water. Grapes are genetically coded to be climbers > >> and reach for the sun. *When water is reduced, the grape vine will stop > >> sending energy to the shoot growth and instead put its energy into > >> maturing the seeds and fruit to make it more likely birds and other > >> animals will eat them, spread their seeds and perpetuate the species. > >> This is the only thing nature cares about - perpetuating the species. > > >> > "You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell them > >> > of > >> >> your 2 brix increase revelation. " > > >> > Most viticulturists are like you, they claim that grape vines grow > >> > better with no water. Maybe that is why the Fench only have "vintage > >> > years" every 20 years or so. > > >> Tell it to the French. > > >> Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. *I suppose you disagree with > >> this also. > > >> Publish. and have your work peer reviewed. *Most research viticulturists > >> would welcome your documented research. > > >> Paul > > >> > "Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial > >> >> growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor." > > >> > And I'm sure they also fertilize. > > >> NO!! most do not fertilize. > > >> > If they put their mouths were their > >> > money was they wouldn't feritlize. > > >> They don't. > > >> > BTW, fertilizer is USELESS if there > >> > is no water in the soil for the roots to soak it up which blows away > >> > your theory about vines growing well in "arid" regions. > > >> The proof is well established. *I think you live in California, right? > >> What is the climate in most of the vineyards there? *What is the climate > >> in Washington State where grapes are grown. *What is the climate in > >> Argentina and Chile where grapes are grown. *Vitis Vinifera originated in > >> Eurasia near the Caspian and Black Sea - hardly a tropical paradise. > > >> > While grapes > >> > roots do go deep a good percentage of them are near the surface. > > >> Yep, if you water them, you will have a good amount of them near the > >> surface. > > >> > "You will also find many references in the literature that state > >> > grapes do no > >> >> like wet feet" > > >> > They don't like wet feet. What they like is well drained soil which by > >> > design dries out FAST. That is why mulching over optimum soil is the > >> > RIGHT thing to do. > > >> Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard differently in > >> different rows and compare. > > >> > " > > >> > On Sep 3, 8:43*am, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > Micheal, > > >> >> > Always trust your eyes and keep observing. > > >> >> The very best thing for Michael to do is an experiment where he > >> >> mulches a row or rows and leaves the others unmulched and see if he > >> >> gets the "2 brix" increase on the mulched rows that you claim. The > >> >> thing(s) that increase brix are more sunlight and more growing degree > >> >> days. *Perhaps the only thing Michael can do is cut down trees or > >> >> other obstacles obstructing sunlight. > > >> >> You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell them > >> >> of your 2 brix increase revelation. *I am sure you could start a new > >> >> trend in grape growing. > > >> >> You never did answer my question that I asked in the past; where are > >> >> you growing your grapes and what are you growing? > > >> >> > Paul, without any proof, is > >> >> > saying that what I have observed and what you have have observed > >> >> > couldn't be true. > > >> >> Paul at least uses his real name. > > >> >> I am saying that I have no doubt that mulching will increase vigor. > >> >> Increased vigor in an already vigorous situation will NOT improve > >> >> grape quality. *In fact, it will do just the opposite. Do you like > >> >> your wine to smell and taste like vegetables? *Here in the Mid > >> >> Atlantic, commercial growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor. > > >> >> > It sounds like in your case, mulching has helped > >> >> > tremendously. There are many reasons for mulch and the main reason > >> >> > is that a healthy vine is a good vine. It's as simple as that. > > >> >> The French say that the best wine is made from the struggling vine. > >> >> Hmmm, something to think about there, doublesb. > > >> >> You will also find many references in the literature that state grapes > >> >> do no like wet feet. *Grape vine roots can go VERY deep; *deeper than > >> >> almost all other plants. *You can not compare the root system of other > >> >> shallow rooted plants to grape vines. *Promoting a shallow root system > >> >> is not a good thing to do for grape vines. *Also consider where Vitis > >> >> Vinifera originated - NOT in parts of the world that had vigorous > >> >> growth. Also, it is most successfully grown - in semi arid areas. > > >> >> >> On 3 Sep, 02:50, "Paul E. Lehmann" > > >> >> >> wrote: > > >> >> >> > michael wrote: > >> >> >> > > On 30 Aug, 02:17, "Paul E. Lehmann" > > >> >> >> > > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> > "I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf > >> >> >> > >> > area in ripening fruit." > > >> >> >> > >> > "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few days > >> >> >> > >> > ago to help ripening." > > >> >> >> > >> > I think you had the right idea in the first comment. Pulling > >> >> >> > >> > leaves doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will delay it. The > >> >> >> > >> > vine takes time to readjust it's physiology to compensate > >> >> >> > >> > for the lost leaves. In an environment like yours you need > >> >> >> > >> > alent from *the leaves you can get. People who grow grapes > >> >> >> > >> > in California or an area with more sunshine and heat have > >> >> >> > >> > much more room to hack up the vines, you don't. > > >> >> >> > >> Here is an excellent article on the subject. > >> >> >> > >> Most of this research supports doublesb's previous comments > >> >> >> > >> but also note the authors comments about situations of extreme > >> >> >> > >> vigor. > > >> >> >> > >>http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=...e&dataId=10457 > > >> >> >> > >> Paul > > >> >> >> > >> >> On Aug 28, 8:36*am, michael > > >> >> >> > >> >> wrote: I received some very interesting advice a month or > >> >> >> > >> >> two ago,concerning the thinning of vertical shoots for > >> >> >> > >> >> grapes trained in the Double Guyot method.I pruned the > >> >> >> > >> >> sidehoots to one or two leaves earlier when the canopy was > >> >> >> > >> >> in full growth,and since the beginning of August have left > >> >> >> > >> >> more on.I removed some lower leaves just before netting a > >> >> >> > >> >> few days ago to help ripening. I have an excellent crop > >> >> >> > >> >> this year,which seems to be ripening well.My mini vineyard > >> >> >> > >> >> is in Herefordshire,England,and we have to be satisfied > >> >> >> > >> >> with Brix values maximising at about 18 for reds or > >> >> >> > >> >> whites.However one of my reds is already at 14.0,a couple > >> >> >> > >> >> of weeks before harvest,which will be early this year in > >> >> >> > >> >> England.Our temperatures have not been great in the daytime > >> >> >> > >> >> at 20-22C,but the night time temperatures have not fallen > >> >> >> > >> >> below > > ... > > read more » |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul,
What type of soil do you have down there in Maryland that promotes so much vigor? I, like Michael, grow my vines on WELL DRAINED soil. My soil is sand. Not sandy loam, sand. I think what the problem is in our disagreement is that Maryland doesn't really have optimum soil to grow grapes to begin with so your viticultural practices are aimed at correcting the biggest mistake you can make as a "expert" viticuluralist, site selection. On Sep 4, 6:25*am, wrote: > "As I thought, you are afraid to publish in any magazine read by and > contributed to by viticulturists." > > Viticuluralists are off in orbit when it comes to farming. I've had > enough experience with them to know they would never make it if they > had to grow something that was actually hard to grow. They end up > killing more vines than they cultivate. The main reason for it is that > they all think that what works in Maryland will work in England and > will pound the table trying to convince you. Your insistence that > Michael couldn't possibly be seeing positive effects from mulch is par > for the course. > > On Sep 3, 7:45*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > > > > > wrote: > > > "Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard differently > > > in > > > *different rows and compare" > > > > He did, and he seems happy with mulch. Your the one who doesn't accept > > > his observations. > > > I am talking about a trial between rows in the same year!!! > > Not one year compared to another. * > > Also, the crop is not yet in for this year. *A vigorous vine does not mean > > the fruit is good. > > > > "The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is > > > *regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water " > > > > If they mulched they wouldn't need irrigation. > > > Try drinking wine instead of growing and smoking wacky weed your reasoning > > may be better. :-) > > > > "Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as > > > there > > > *is ample sun and water. " > > > > So they do need water? > > > Yes, but a LOT less than other fruits. *Ever been to Grand Junction, > > Colorado, Moab Utah? *Quite a desert environment there and they grow good > > fruit - WITHOUT MULCHING. > > > > "Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. *I suppose you disagree > > > with > > > *this also." > > > > I wrote that mulch actually refrains vigor ( due to it absorbing the > > > water) while increasing the health of the vine.. > > > > "Publish. and have your work peer reviewed." > > > > It's already been done. Grapes are plants. They benefit from mulching.. > > > As I thought, you are afraid to publish in any magazine read by and > > contributed to by viticulturists. > > > STILL no answer as to where you live and what you are growing. *Afraid of > > this question? *I am also not impressed that you hide behind an alias.. > > > Paul > > > > On Sep 3, 4:07*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > > >> wrote: > > >> > " The thing(s) that increase > > >> > brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days." > > > >> > That is not true. If what you say is true than growing a vine in the > > >> > sahara desert would yield the best grapes. > > > >> I see, you STILL refuse to state your name and where you live and grow > > >> grapes and which varieties you grow. > > > >> Ever see an oasis in the desert? *Plants there do very well with just a > > >> little water. > > > >> The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is > > >> regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water - sort > > >> of like fine tuning an IV for a Human in the hospital. Drip irrigation is > > >> usually cut off or reduced to promote better ripening near harvest time. > > >> In your theory, you would give them all the water they wanted. *The > > >> result would be extremely long canes with poor fruit. > > > >> Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as > > >> there is ample sun and water. Grapes are genetically coded to be climbers > > >> and reach for the sun. *When water is reduced, the grape vine will stop > > >> sending energy to the shoot growth and instead put its energy into > > >> maturing the seeds and fruit to make it more likely birds and other > > >> animals will eat them, spread their seeds and perpetuate the species.. > > >> This is the only thing nature cares about - perpetuating the species.. > > > >> > "You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell them > > >> > of > > >> >> your 2 brix increase revelation. " > > > >> > Most viticulturists are like you, they claim that grape vines grow > > >> > better with no water. Maybe that is why the Fench only have "vintage > > >> > years" every 20 years or so. > > > >> Tell it to the French. > > > >> Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. *I suppose you disagree with > > >> this also. > > > >> Publish. and have your work peer reviewed. *Most research viticulturists > > >> would welcome your documented research. > > > >> Paul > > > >> > "Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial > > >> >> growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor." > > > >> > And I'm sure they also fertilize. > > > >> NO!! most do not fertilize. > > > >> > If they put their mouths were their > > >> > money was they wouldn't feritlize. > > > >> They don't. > > > >> > BTW, fertilizer is USELESS if there > > >> > is no water in the soil for the roots to soak it up which blows away > > >> > your theory about vines growing well in "arid" regions. > > > >> The proof is well established. *I think you live in California, right? > > >> What is the climate in most of the vineyards there? *What is the climate > > >> in Washington State where grapes are grown. *What is the climate in > > >> Argentina and Chile where grapes are grown. *Vitis Vinifera originated in > > >> Eurasia near the Caspian and Black Sea - hardly a tropical paradise. > > > >> > While grapes > > >> > roots do go deep a good percentage of them are near the surface. > > > >> Yep, if you water them, you will have a good amount of them near the > > >> surface. > > > >> > "You will also find many references in the literature that state > > >> > grapes do no > > >> >> like wet feet" > > > >> > They don't like wet feet. What they like is well drained soil which by > > >> > design dries out FAST. That is why mulching over optimum soil is the > > >> > RIGHT thing to do. > > > >> Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard differently in > > >> different rows and compare. > > > >> > " > > > >> > On Sep 3, 8:43*am, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > Micheal, > > > >> >> > Always trust your eyes and keep observing. > > > >> >> The very best thing for Michael to do is an experiment where he > > >> >> mulches a row or rows and leaves the others unmulched and see if he > > >> >> gets the "2 brix" increase on the mulched rows that you claim. The > > >> >> thing(s) that increase brix are more sunlight and more growing degree > > >> >> days. *Perhaps the only thing Michael can do is cut down trees or > > >> >> other obstacles obstructing sunlight. > > > >> >> You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell them > > >> >> of your 2 brix increase revelation. *I am sure you could start a new > > >> >> trend in grape growing. > > > >> >> You never did answer my question that I asked in the past; where are > > >> >> you growing your grapes and what are you growing? > > > >> >> > Paul, without any proof, is > > >> >> > saying that what I have observed and what you have have observed > > >> >> > couldn't be true. > > > >> >> Paul at least uses his real name. > > > >> >> I am saying that I have no doubt that mulching will increase vigor. |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
> Paul, > > The more I read this statement, the more I laugh. > > ""The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is > regulated by drip irrigation " In the "New World" this is true. > > So much for natural "terroir". > > BTW, the french are great winemakers but are average winegrowers. The french also say that "Wine is made on the vine" > > > On Sep 3, 7:45Â*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: >> wrote: >> > "Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard differently >> > in >> > different rows and compare" >> >> > He did, and he seems happy with mulch. Your the one who doesn't accept >> > his observations. >> >> I am talking about a trial between rows in the same year!!! >> Not one year compared to another. >> Also, the crop is not yet in for this year. Â*A vigorous vine does not >> mean the fruit is good. >> >> >> >> > "The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is >> > regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water " >> >> > If they mulched they wouldn't need irrigation. >> >> Try drinking wine instead of growing and smoking wacky weed your >> reasoning may be better. :-) >> >> >> >> > "Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as >> > there >> > is ample sun and water. " >> >> > So they do need water? >> >> Yes, but a LOT less than other fruits. Â*Ever been to Grand Junction, >> Colorado, Moab Utah? Â*Quite a desert environment there and they grow good >> fruit - WITHOUT MULCHING. >> >> >> >> > "Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. Â*I suppose you disagree >> > with >> > this also." >> >> > I wrote that mulch actually refrains vigor ( due to it absorbing the >> > water) while increasing the health of the vine.. >> >> > "Publish. and have your work peer reviewed." >> >> > It's already been done. Grapes are plants. They benefit from mulching. >> >> As I thought, you are afraid to publish in any magazine read by and >> contributed to by viticulturists. >> >> STILL no answer as to where you live and what you are growing. Â*Afraid of >> this question? Â*I am also not impressed that you hide behind an alias. >> >> Paul >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Sep 3, 4:07Â*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: >> >> wrote: >> >> > " The thing(s) that increase >> >> > brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days." >> >> >> > That is not true. If what you say is true than growing a vine in the >> >> > sahara desert would yield the best grapes. >> >> >> I see, you STILL refuse to state your name and where you live and grow >> >> grapes and which varieties you grow. >> >> >> Ever see an oasis in the desert? Â*Plants there do very well with just >> >> a little water. >> >> >> The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is >> >> regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water - >> >> sort of like fine tuning an IV for a Human in the hospital. Drip >> >> irrigation is usually cut off or reduced to promote better ripening >> >> near harvest time. In your theory, you would give them all the water >> >> they wanted. Â*The result would be extremely long canes with poor >> >> fruit. >> >> >> Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as >> >> there is ample sun and water. Grapes are genetically coded to be >> >> climbers and reach for the sun. Â*When water is reduced, the grape vine >> >> will stop sending energy to the shoot growth and instead put its >> >> energy into maturing the seeds and fruit to make it more likely birds >> >> and other animals will eat them, spread their seeds and perpetuate the >> >> species. This is the only thing nature cares about - perpetuating the >> >> species. >> >> >> > "You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell >> >> > them of >> >> >> your 2 brix increase revelation. " >> >> >> > Most viticulturists are like you, they claim that grape vines grow >> >> > better with no water. Maybe that is why the Fench only have "vintage >> >> > years" every 20 years or so. >> >> >> Tell it to the French. >> >> >> Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. Â*I suppose you disagree >> >> with this also. >> >> >> Publish. and have your work peer reviewed. Â*Most research >> >> viticulturists would welcome your documented research. >> >> >> Paul >> >> >> > "Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial >> >> >> growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor." >> >> >> > And I'm sure they also fertilize. >> >> >> NO!! most do not fertilize. >> >> >> > If they put their mouths were their >> >> > money was they wouldn't feritlize. >> >> >> They don't. >> >> >> > BTW, fertilizer is USELESS if there >> >> > is no water in the soil for the roots to soak it up which blows away >> >> > your theory about vines growing well in "arid" regions. >> >> >> The proof is well established. Â*I think you live in California, right? >> >> What is the climate in most of the vineyards there? Â*What is the >> >> climate in Washington State where grapes are grown. Â*What is the >> >> climate in Argentina and Chile where grapes are grown. Â*Vitis Vinifera >> >> originated in Eurasia near the Caspian and Black Sea - hardly a >> >> tropical paradise. >> >> >> > While grapes >> >> > roots do go deep a good percentage of them are near the surface. >> >> >> Yep, if you water them, you will have a good amount of them near the >> >> surface. >> >> >> > "You will also find many references in the literature that state >> >> > grapes do no >> >> >> like wet feet" >> >> >> > They don't like wet feet. What they like is well drained soil which >> >> > by design dries out FAST. That is why mulching over optimum soil is >> >> > the RIGHT thing to do. >> >> >> Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard differently >> >> in different rows and compare. >> >> >> > " >> >> >> > On Sep 3, 8:43Â*am, "Paul E. Lehmann" > >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > Micheal, >> >> >> >> > Always trust your eyes and keep observing. >> >> >> >> The very best thing for Michael to do is an experiment where he >> >> >> mulches a row or rows and leaves the others unmulched and see if he >> >> >> gets the "2 brix" increase on the mulched rows that you claim. The >> >> >> thing(s) that increase brix are more sunlight and more growing >> >> >> degree days. Â*Perhaps the only thing Michael can do is cut down >> >> >> trees or other obstacles obstructing sunlight. >> >> >> >> You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell >> >> >> them of your 2 brix increase revelation. Â*I am sure you could start >> >> >> a new trend in grape growing. >> >> >> >> You never did answer my question that I asked in the past; where >> >> >> are you growing your grapes and what are you growing? >> >> >> >> > Paul, without any proof, is >> >> >> > saying that what I have observed and what you have have observed >> >> >> > couldn't be true. >> >> >> >> Paul at least uses his real name. >> >> >> >> I am saying that I have no doubt that mulching will increase vigor. >> >> >> Increased vigor in an already vigorous situation will NOT improve >> >> >> grape quality. Â*In fact, it will do just the opposite. Do you like >> >> >> your wine to smell and taste like vegetables? Â*Here in the Mid >> >> >> Atlantic, commercial growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor. >> >> >> >> > It sounds like in your case, mulching has helped >> >> >> > tremendously. There are many reasons for mulch and the main >> >> >> > reason is that a healthy vine is a good vine. It's as simple as >> >> >> > that. >> >> >> >> The French say that the best wine is made from the struggling vine. >> >> >> Hmmm, something to think about there, doublesb. >> >> >> >> You will also find many references in the literature that state >> >> >> grapes do no like wet feet. Â*Grape vine roots can go VERY deep; >> >> >> deeper than almost all other plants. Â*You can not compare the root >> >> >> system of other shallow rooted plants to grape vines. Â*Promoting a >> >> >> shallow root system is not a good thing to do for grape vines. >> >> >> Also consider where Vitis Vinifera originated - NOT in parts of the >> >> >> world that had vigorous growth. Also, it is most successfully grown >> >> >> - in semi arid areas. >> >> >> >> >> On 3 Sep, 02:50, "Paul E. Lehmann" > >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > michael wrote: >> >> >> >> > > On 30 Aug, 02:17, "Paul E. Lehmann" >> >> >> >> > > > wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> > "I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf >> >> >> >> > >> > area in ripening fruit." >> >> >> >> >> > >> > "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few >> >> >> >> > >> > days ago to help ripening." >> >> >> >> >> > >> > I think you had the right idea in the first comment. >> >> >> >> > >> > Pulling leaves doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will >> >> >> >> > >> > delay it. The vine takes time to readjust it's physiology >> >> >> >> > >> > to compensate for the lost leaves. In an environment like >> >> >> >> > >> > yours you need alent from Â*the leaves you can get. People >> >> >> >> > >> > who grow grapes in California or an area with more >> >> >> >> > >> > sunshine and heat have much more room to hack up the >> >> >> >> > >> > vines, you don't. >> >> >> >> >> > >> Here is an excellent article on the subject. >> >> >> >> > >> Most of this research supports doublesb's previous comments >> >> >> >> > >> but also note the authors comments about situations of >> >> >> >> > >> extreme vigor. >> >> >> >> >> > >>http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=...e&dataId=10457 >> >> >> >> >> > >> Paul >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> On Aug 28, 8:36Â*am, michael >> >> >> >> > >> >> > wrote: I received some >> >> >> >> > >> >> very interesting advice a month or two ago,concerning >> >> >> >> > >> >> the thinning of vertical shoots for grapes trained in >> >> >> >> > >> >> the Double Guyot method.I pruned the sidehoots to one or >> >> >> >> > >> >> two leaves earlier when the canopy was in full >> >> >> >> > >> >> growth,and since the beginning of August have left more >> >> >> >> > >> >> on.I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few >> >> >> >> > >> >> days ago to help ripening. I have an excellent crop this >> >> >> >> > >> >> year,which seems to be ripening well.My mini vineyard is >> >> >> >> > >> >> in Herefordshire,England,and we have to be satisfied >> >> >> >> > >> >> with Brix values maximising at about 18 for reds or >> >> >> >> > >> >> whites.However one of my reds is already at 14.0,a >> >> >> >> > >> >> couple of weeks before harvest,which will be early this >> >> >> >> > >> >> year in England.Our temperatures have not been great in >> >> >> >> > >> >> the daytime at 20-22C,but the night time temperatures >> >> >> >> > >> >> have not fallen below >> >> ... >> >> read more » |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
> "As I thought, you are afraid to publish in any magazine read by and > contributed to by viticulturists." > > Viticuluralists are off in orbit when it comes to farming. I've had > enough experience with them to know they would never make it if they > had to grow something that was actually hard to grow. They end up > killing more vines than they cultivate. The main reason for it is that > they all think that what works in Maryland will work in England and > will pound the table trying to convince you. Your insistence that > Michael couldn't possibly be seeing positive effects from mulch is par > for the course. > I repeat: I am talking about a trial between rows in the same year!!! Not one year compared to another. Also, the crop is not yet in for this year. A vigorous vine does not mean the fruit is go > > > On Sep 3, 7:45Â*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: >> wrote: >> > "Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard differently >> > in >> > different rows and compare" >> >> > He did, and he seems happy with mulch. Your the one who doesn't accept >> > his observations. >> >> I am talking about a trial between rows in the same year!!! >> Not one year compared to another. >> Also, the crop is not yet in for this year. Â*A vigorous vine does not >> mean the fruit is good. >> >> >> >> > "The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is >> > regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water " >> >> > If they mulched they wouldn't need irrigation. >> >> Try drinking wine instead of growing and smoking wacky weed your >> reasoning may be better. :-) >> >> >> >> > "Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as >> > there >> > is ample sun and water. " >> >> > So they do need water? >> >> Yes, but a LOT less than other fruits. Â*Ever been to Grand Junction, >> Colorado, Moab Utah? Â*Quite a desert environment there and they grow good >> fruit - WITHOUT MULCHING. >> >> >> >> > "Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. Â*I suppose you disagree >> > with >> > this also." >> >> > I wrote that mulch actually refrains vigor ( due to it absorbing the >> > water) while increasing the health of the vine.. >> >> > "Publish. and have your work peer reviewed." >> >> > It's already been done. Grapes are plants. They benefit from mulching. >> >> As I thought, you are afraid to publish in any magazine read by and >> contributed to by viticulturists. >> >> STILL no answer as to where you live and what you are growing. Â*Afraid of >> this question? Â*I am also not impressed that you hide behind an alias. >> >> Paul >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Sep 3, 4:07Â*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: >> >> wrote: >> >> > " The thing(s) that increase >> >> > brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days." >> >> >> > That is not true. If what you say is true than growing a vine in the >> >> > sahara desert would yield the best grapes. >> >> >> I see, you STILL refuse to state your name and where you live and grow >> >> grapes and which varieties you grow. >> >> >> Ever see an oasis in the desert? Â*Plants there do very well with just >> >> a little water. >> >> >> The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is >> >> regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water - >> >> sort of like fine tuning an IV for a Human in the hospital. Drip >> >> irrigation is usually cut off or reduced to promote better ripening >> >> near harvest time. In your theory, you would give them all the water >> >> they wanted. Â*The result would be extremely long canes with poor >> >> fruit. >> >> >> Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as >> >> there is ample sun and water. Grapes are genetically coded to be >> >> climbers and reach for the sun. Â*When water is reduced, the grape vine >> >> will stop sending energy to the shoot growth and instead put its >> >> energy into maturing the seeds and fruit to make it more likely birds >> >> and other animals will eat them, spread their seeds and perpetuate the >> >> species. This is the only thing nature cares about - perpetuating the >> >> species. >> >> >> > "You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell >> >> > them of >> >> >> your 2 brix increase revelation. " >> >> >> > Most viticulturists are like you, they claim that grape vines grow >> >> > better with no water. Maybe that is why the Fench only have "vintage >> >> > years" every 20 years or so. >> >> >> Tell it to the French. >> >> >> Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. Â*I suppose you disagree >> >> with this also. >> >> >> Publish. and have your work peer reviewed. Â*Most research >> >> viticulturists would welcome your documented research. >> >> >> Paul >> >> >> > "Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial >> >> >> growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor." >> >> >> > And I'm sure they also fertilize. >> >> >> NO!! most do not fertilize. >> >> >> > If they put their mouths were their >> >> > money was they wouldn't feritlize. >> >> >> They don't. >> >> >> > BTW, fertilizer is USELESS if there >> >> > is no water in the soil for the roots to soak it up which blows away >> >> > your theory about vines growing well in "arid" regions. >> >> >> The proof is well established. Â*I think you live in California, right? >> >> What is the climate in most of the vineyards there? Â*What is the >> >> climate in Washington State where grapes are grown. Â*What is the >> >> climate in Argentina and Chile where grapes are grown. Â*Vitis Vinifera >> >> originated in Eurasia near the Caspian and Black Sea - hardly a >> >> tropical paradise. >> >> >> > While grapes >> >> > roots do go deep a good percentage of them are near the surface. >> >> >> Yep, if you water them, you will have a good amount of them near the >> >> surface. >> >> >> > "You will also find many references in the literature that state >> >> > grapes do no >> >> >> like wet feet" >> >> >> > They don't like wet feet. What they like is well drained soil which >> >> > by design dries out FAST. That is why mulching over optimum soil is >> >> > the RIGHT thing to do. >> >> >> Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard differently >> >> in different rows and compare. >> >> >> > " >> >> >> > On Sep 3, 8:43Â*am, "Paul E. Lehmann" > >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > Micheal, >> >> >> >> > Always trust your eyes and keep observing. >> >> >> >> The very best thing for Michael to do is an experiment where he >> >> >> mulches a row or rows and leaves the others unmulched and see if he >> >> >> gets the "2 brix" increase on the mulched rows that you claim. The >> >> >> thing(s) that increase brix are more sunlight and more growing >> >> >> degree days. Â*Perhaps the only thing Michael can do is cut down >> >> >> trees or other obstacles obstructing sunlight. >> >> >> >> You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell >> >> >> them of your 2 brix increase revelation. Â*I am sure you could start >> >> >> a new trend in grape growing. >> >> >> >> You never did answer my question that I asked in the past; where >> >> >> are you growing your grapes and what are you growing? >> >> >> >> > Paul, without any proof, is >> >> >> > saying that what I have observed and what you have have observed >> >> >> > couldn't be true. >> >> >> >> Paul at least uses his real name. >> >> >> >> I am saying that I have no doubt that mulching will increase vigor. >> >> >> Increased vigor in an already vigorous situation will NOT improve >> >> >> grape quality. Â*In fact, it will do just the opposite. Do you like >> >> >> your wine to smell and taste like vegetables? Â*Here in the Mid >> >> >> Atlantic, commercial growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor. >> >> >> >> > It sounds like in your case, mulching has helped >> >> >> > tremendously. There are many reasons for mulch and the main >> >> >> > reason is that a healthy vine is a good vine. It's as simple as >> >> >> > that. >> >> >> >> The French say that the best wine is made from the struggling vine. >> >> >> Hmmm, something to think about there, doublesb. >> >> >> >> You will also find many references in the literature that state >> >> >> grapes do no like wet feet. Â*Grape vine roots can go VERY deep; >> >> >> deeper than almost all other plants. Â*You can not compare the root >> >> >> system of other shallow rooted plants to grape vines. Â*Promoting a >> >> >> shallow root system is not a good thing to do for grape vines. >> >> >> Also consider where Vitis Vinifera originated - NOT in parts of the >> >> >> world that had vigorous growth. Also, it is most successfully grown >> >> >> - in semi arid areas. >> >> >> >> >> On 3 Sep, 02:50, "Paul E. Lehmann" > >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > michael wrote: >> >> >> >> > > On 30 Aug, 02:17, "Paul E. Lehmann" >> >> >> >> > > > wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> > "I have had a good example this year of the role of leaf >> >> >> >> > >> > area in ripening fruit." >> >> >> >> >> > >> > "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few >> >> >> >> > >> > days ago to help ripening." >> >> >> >> >> > >> > I think you had the right idea in the first comment. >> >> >> >> > >> > Pulling leaves doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will >> >> >> >> > >> > delay it. The vine takes time to readjust it's physiology >> >> >> >> > >> > to compensate for the lost leaves. In an environment like >> >> >> >> > >> > yours you need alent from Â*the leaves you can get. People >> >> >> >> > >> > who grow grapes in California or an area with more >> >> >> >> > >> > sunshine and heat have much more room to hack up the >> >> >> >> > >> > vines, you don't. >> >> >> >> >> > >> Here is an excellent article on the subject. >> >> >> >> > >> Most of this research supports doublesb's previous comments >> >> >> >> > >> but also note the authors comments about situations of >> >> >> >> > >> extreme vigor. >> >> >> >> >> > >>http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=...e&dataId=10457 >> >> >> >> >> > >> Paul >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> On Aug 28, 8:36Â*am, michael >> >> >> >> > >> >> > wrote: I received some >> >> >> >> > >> >> very interesting advice a month or two ago,concerning >> >> >> >> > >> >> the thinning of vertical shoots for grapes trained in >> >> >> >> > >> >> the Double Guyot method.I pruned the sidehoots to one or >> >> >> >> > >> >> two leaves earlier when the canopy was in full >> >> >> >> > >> >> growth,and since the beginning of August have left more >> >> >> >> > >> >> on.I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few >> >> >> >> > >> >> days ago to help ripening. I have an excellent crop this >> >> >> >> > >> >> year,which seems to be ripening well.My mini vineyard is >> >> >> >> > >> >> in Herefordshire,England,and we have to be satisfied >> >> >> >> > >> >> with Brix values maximising at about 18 for reds or >> >> >> >> > >> >> whites.However one of my reds is already at 14.0,a >> >> >> >> > >> >> couple of weeks before harvest,which will be early this >> >> >> >> > >> >> year in England.Our temperatures have not been great in >> >> >> >> > >> >> the daytime at 20-22C,but the night time temperatures >> >> >> >> > >> >> have not fallen below >> >> ... >> >> read more » |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
> Paul, > > What type of soil do you have down there in Maryland that promotes so > much vigor? In my vineyard(s) I have a sandy loam. There are a variety of soil types in Maryland. It is NOT THE SOIL that promotes the vigor here. It is the moisture we receive. I believe the same is true in Michael's case. The better years are the years that we have minimal rains during bloom and fruit set and then again minimal rain after verasion. You refuse to mention were you are growing your grapes so I assume you are in California which in most cases never or very seldom experiences this situation. If this is the case, you can not even begin to get an idea of the vigor problem without first hand experience. Grapes can be grown on a variety of soil types. I suggest you read the book "Terroir" by James E. Wilson. Wilson, like myself, is a Geologist. All of my professional career was working as a Geologist, Hydrologist and Physical Scientist. I worked for a vineyard and winemaking consultant after retiring. Just curious, what is your background? > I, like Michael, grow my vines on WELL DRAINED soil. My > soil is sand. Not sandy loam, sand. I think what the problem is in our > disagreement is that Maryland doesn't really have optimum soil to grow > grapes to begin with so your viticultural practices are aimed at > correcting the biggest mistake you can make as a "expert" > viticuluralist, site selection. > > > On Sep 4, 6:25Â*am, wrote: >> "As I thought, you are afraid to publish in any magazine read by and >> contributed to by viticulturists." >> >> Viticuluralists are off in orbit when it comes to farming. I've had >> enough experience with them to know they would never make it if they >> had to grow something that was actually hard to grow. They end up >> killing more vines than they cultivate. The main reason for it is that >> they all think that what works in Maryland will work in England and >> will pound the table trying to convince you. Your insistence that >> Michael couldn't possibly be seeing positive effects from mulch is par >> for the course. >> >> On Sep 3, 7:45Â*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: >> >> >> >> > wrote: >> > > "Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard >> > > differently in >> > > different rows and compare" >> >> > > He did, and he seems happy with mulch. Your the one who doesn't >> > > accept his observations. >> >> > I am talking about a trial between rows in the same year!!! >> > Not one year compared to another. >> > Also, the crop is not yet in for this year. Â*A vigorous vine does not >> > mean the fruit is good. >> >> > > "The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is >> > > regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water " >> >> > > If they mulched they wouldn't need irrigation. >> >> > Try drinking wine instead of growing and smoking wacky weed your >> > reasoning may be better. :-) >> >> > > "Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as >> > > there >> > > is ample sun and water. " >> >> > > So they do need water? >> >> > Yes, but a LOT less than other fruits. Â*Ever been to Grand Junction, >> > Colorado, Moab Utah? Â*Quite a desert environment there and they grow >> > good fruit - WITHOUT MULCHING. >> >> > > "Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. Â*I suppose you disagree >> > > with >> > > this also." >> >> > > I wrote that mulch actually refrains vigor ( due to it absorbing the >> > > water) while increasing the health of the vine.. >> >> > > "Publish. and have your work peer reviewed." >> >> > > It's already been done. Grapes are plants. They benefit from >> > > mulching. >> >> > As I thought, you are afraid to publish in any magazine read by and >> > contributed to by viticulturists. >> >> > STILL no answer as to where you live and what you are growing. Â*Afraid >> > of this question? Â*I am also not impressed that you hide behind an >> > alias. >> >> > Paul >> >> > > On Sep 3, 4:07Â*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > >> > > wrote: >> > >> wrote: >> > >> > " The thing(s) that increase >> > >> > brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days." >> >> > >> > That is not true. If what you say is true than growing a vine in >> > >> > the sahara desert would yield the best grapes. >> >> > >> I see, you STILL refuse to state your name and where you live and >> > >> grow grapes and which varieties you grow. >> >> > >> Ever see an oasis in the desert? Â*Plants there do very well with >> > >> just a little water. >> >> > >> The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is >> > >> regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water - >> > >> sort of like fine tuning an IV for a Human in the hospital. Drip >> > >> irrigation is usually cut off or reduced to promote better ripening >> > >> near harvest time. In your theory, you would give them all the water >> > >> they wanted. Â*The result would be extremely long canes with poor >> > >> fruit. >> >> > >> Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as >> > >> there is ample sun and water. Grapes are genetically coded to be >> > >> climbers and reach for the sun. Â*When water is reduced, the grape >> > >> vine will stop sending energy to the shoot growth and instead put >> > >> its energy into maturing the seeds and fruit to make it more likely >> > >> birds and other animals will eat them, spread their seeds and >> > >> perpetuate the species. This is the only thing nature cares about - >> > >> perpetuating the species. >> >> > >> > "You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell >> > >> > them of >> > >> >> your 2 brix increase revelation. " >> >> > >> > Most viticulturists are like you, they claim that grape vines grow >> > >> > better with no water. Maybe that is why the Fench only have >> > >> > "vintage years" every 20 years or so. >> >> > >> Tell it to the French. >> >> > >> Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. Â*I suppose you disagree >> > >> with this also. >> >> > >> Publish. and have your work peer reviewed. Â*Most research >> > >> viticulturists would welcome your documented research. >> >> > >> Paul >> >> > >> > "Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial >> > >> >> growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor." >> >> > >> > And I'm sure they also fertilize. >> >> > >> NO!! most do not fertilize. >> >> > >> > If they put their mouths were their >> > >> > money was they wouldn't feritlize. >> >> > >> They don't. >> >> > >> > BTW, fertilizer is USELESS if there >> > >> > is no water in the soil for the roots to soak it up which blows >> > >> > away your theory about vines growing well in "arid" regions. >> >> > >> The proof is well established. Â*I think you live in California, >> > >> right? What is the climate in most of the vineyards there? Â*What is >> > >> the climate in Washington State where grapes are grown. Â*What is the >> > >> climate in Argentina and Chile where grapes are grown. Â*Vitis >> > >> Vinifera originated in Eurasia near the Caspian and Black Sea - >> > >> hardly a tropical paradise. >> >> > >> > While grapes >> > >> > roots do go deep a good percentage of them are near the surface. >> >> > >> Yep, if you water them, you will have a good amount of them near the >> > >> surface. >> >> > >> > "You will also find many references in the literature that state >> > >> > grapes do no >> > >> >> like wet feet" >> >> > >> > They don't like wet feet. What they like is well drained soil >> > >> > which by design dries out FAST. That is why mulching over optimum >> > >> > soil is the RIGHT thing to do. >> >> > >> Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard >> > >> differently in different rows and compare. >> >> > >> > " >> >> > >> > On Sep 3, 8:43Â*am, "Paul E. Lehmann" > >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > Micheal, >> >> > >> >> > Always trust your eyes and keep observing. >> >> > >> >> The very best thing for Michael to do is an experiment where he >> > >> >> mulches a row or rows and leaves the others unmulched and see if >> > >> >> he gets the "2 brix" increase on the mulched rows that you claim. >> > >> >> The thing(s) that increase brix are more sunlight and more >> > >> >> growing degree days. Â*Perhaps the only thing Michael can do is >> > >> >> cut down trees or other obstacles obstructing sunlight. >> >> > >> >> You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell >> > >> >> them of your 2 brix increase revelation. Â*I am sure you could >> > >> >> start a new trend in grape growing. >> >> > >> >> You never did answer my question that I asked in the past; where >> > >> >> are you growing your grapes and what are you growing? >> >> > >> >> > Paul, without any proof, is >> > >> >> > saying that what I have observed and what you have have >> > >> >> > observed couldn't be true. >> >> > >> >> Paul at least uses his real name. >> >> > >> >> I am saying that I have no doubt that mulching will increase >> > >> >> vigor. Increased vigor in an already vigorous situation will NOT >> > >> >> improve grape quality. Â*In fact, it will do just the opposite. Do >> > >> >> you like your wine to smell and taste like vegetables? Â*Here in >> > >> >> the Mid Atlantic, commercial growers constantly strive to >> > >> >> DECREASE vigor. >> >> > >> >> > It sounds like in your case, mulching has helped >> > >> >> > tremendously. There are many reasons for mulch and the main >> > >> >> > reason is that a healthy vine is a good vine. It's as simple as >> > >> >> > that. >> >> > >> >> The French say that the best wine is made from the struggling >> > >> >> vine. Hmmm, something to think about there, doublesb. >> >> > >> >> You will also find many references in the literature that state >> > >> >> grapes do no like wet feet. Â*Grape vine roots can go VERY deep; >> > >> >> deeper than almost all other plants. Â*You can not compare the >> > >> >> root system of other shallow rooted plants to grape vines. >> > >> >> Promoting a shallow root system is not a good thing to do for >> > >> >> grape vines. Â*Also consider where Vitis Vinifera originated - NOT >> > >> >> in parts of the world that had vigorous growth. Also, it is most >> > >> >> successfully grown - in semi arid areas. >> >> > >> >> >> On 3 Sep, 02:50, "Paul E. Lehmann" > >> > >> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> > michael wrote: >> > >> >> >> > > On 30 Aug, 02:17, "Paul E. Lehmann" >> > >> >> >> > > > wrote: >> > >> >> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> >> > >> > "I have had a good example this year of the role of >> > >> >> >> > >> > leaf area in ripening fruit." >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > "I removed some lower leaves just before netting a few >> > >> >> >> > >> > days ago to help ripening." >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > I think you had the right idea in the first comment. >> > >> >> >> > >> > Pulling leaves doesn't help ripening. In fact, it will >> > >> >> >> > >> > delay it. The vine takes time to readjust it's >> > >> >> >> > >> > physiology to compensate for the lost leaves. In an >> > >> >> >> > >> > environment like yours you need alent from Â*the leaves >> > >> >> >> > >> > you can get. People who grow grapes in California or an >> > >> >> >> > >> > area with more sunshine and heat have much more room to >> > >> >> >> > >> > hack up the vines, you don't. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Here is an excellent article on the subject. >> > >> >> >> > >> Most of this research supports doublesb's previous >> > >> >> >> > >> comments but also note the authors comments about >> > >> >> >> > >> situations of extreme vigor. >> >> > >> >> >> > >>http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=...e&dataId=10457 >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Paul >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> On Aug 28, 8:36Â*am, michael >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > wrote: I received some >> > >> >> >> > >> >> very interesting advice a month or two ago,concerning >> > >> >> >> > >> >> the thinning of vertical shoots for >> >> ... >> >> read more » |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul,
I would bet that where I am has recieved more rain than you and Michael combined. I have not seen any vigor difference between this year and and other year. Like I said, the mulch regulates the vines very well and any water that does get to the ground is drained by the soil thereby keeping a constant soil moisture whether it's pouring or it hasn't rained in 2 weeks. Before I mulched there were some rows that were a lot less vigorous than other rows. After mulching all rows look identical. There is no percievable difference which is why I have concluded that the mulch is a great regulator of vigor and water. BTW, I read the article you posted and it seems to validate what I have been talking about as far as viticulturalists. While each technique has it's advantages in some aspect it also has disadvantages especially for trunk size and the next year. These are crucial when growing in cold climates. Maryland isn't a tough place to grow grapes. In fact you probably don't need to worry too much about winter survival. If you read the article carefully what it really suggests is that if viticuluralists would just leave the vines alone they would be better off. There was no mention of the final brix in the grapes of the good fruit set and the poor fruit set. As a grower of a perenial you constantly need to think about the future( especially since it takes 3 years grow a new vine) along with the current situation before making any changes to the natural evolution of the vine. I think the articale does a good job in detailing the enormous benefits laterals have to fruit ripeng and also trunk size and stored carbs for net year. On Sep 4, 7:56*am, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > wrote: > > Paul, > > > What type of soil do you have down there in Maryland that promotes so > > much vigor? > > In my vineyard(s) I have a sandy loam. *There are a variety of soil types in > Maryland. It is NOT THE SOIL that promotes the vigor here. *It is the > moisture we receive. I believe the same is true in Michael's case. *The > better years are the years that we have minimal rains during bloom and > fruit set and then again minimal rain after verasion. > > You refuse to mention were you are growing your grapes so I assume you are > in California which in most cases never or very seldom experiences this > situation. *If this is the case, you can not even begin to get an idea of > the vigor problem without first hand experience. > > Grapes can be grown on a variety of soil types. I suggest you read the > book "Terroir" by James E. Wilson. *Wilson, like myself, is a Geologist.. > All of my professional career was working as a Geologist, Hydrologist and > Physical Scientist. *I worked for a vineyard and winemaking consultant > after retiring. > > Just curious, what is your background? > > > > > I, like Michael, grow my vines on WELL DRAINED soil. My > > soil is sand. Not sandy loam, sand. I think what the problem is in our > > disagreement is that Maryland doesn't really have optimum soil to grow > > grapes to begin with so your viticultural practices are aimed at > > correcting the biggest mistake you can make as a "expert" > > viticuluralist, site selection. > > > On Sep 4, 6:25*am, wrote: > >> "As I thought, you are afraid to publish in any magazine read by and > >> contributed to by viticulturists." > > >> Viticuluralists are off in orbit when it comes to farming. I've had > >> enough experience with them to know they would never make it if they > >> had to grow something that was actually hard to grow. They end up > >> killing more vines than they cultivate. The main reason for it is that > >> they all think that what works in Maryland will work in England and > >> will pound the table trying to convince you. Your insistence that > >> Michael couldn't possibly be seeing positive effects from mulch is par > >> for the course. > > >> On Sep 3, 7:45*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > > >> > wrote: > >> > > "Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard > >> > > differently in > >> > > different rows and compare" > > >> > > He did, and he seems happy with mulch. Your the one who doesn't > >> > > accept his observations. > > >> > I am talking about a trial between rows in the same year!!! > >> > Not one year compared to another. > >> > Also, the crop is not yet in for this year. *A vigorous vine does not > >> > mean the fruit is good. > > >> > > "The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is > >> > > regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water " > > >> > > If they mulched they wouldn't need irrigation. > > >> > Try drinking wine instead of growing and smoking wacky weed your > >> > reasoning may be better. :-) > > >> > > "Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as > >> > > there > >> > > is ample sun and water. " > > >> > > So they do need water? > > >> > Yes, but a LOT less than other fruits. *Ever been to Grand Junction, > >> > Colorado, Moab Utah? *Quite a desert environment there and they grow > >> > good fruit - WITHOUT MULCHING. > > >> > > "Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. *I suppose you disagree > >> > > with > >> > > this also." > > >> > > I wrote that mulch actually refrains vigor ( due to it absorbing the > >> > > water) while increasing the health of the vine.. > > >> > > "Publish. and have your work peer reviewed." > > >> > > It's already been done. Grapes are plants. They benefit from > >> > > mulching. > > >> > As I thought, you are afraid to publish in any magazine read by and > >> > contributed to by viticulturists. > > >> > STILL no answer as to where you live and what you are growing. *Afraid > >> > of this question? *I am also not impressed that you hide behind an > >> > alias. > > >> > Paul > > >> > > On Sep 3, 4:07*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > > >> > > wrote: > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > " The thing(s) that increase > >> > >> > brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days." > > >> > >> > That is not true. If what you say is true than growing a vine in > >> > >> > the sahara desert would yield the best grapes. > > >> > >> I see, you STILL refuse to state your name and where you live and > >> > >> grow grapes and which varieties you grow. > > >> > >> Ever see an oasis in the desert? *Plants there do very well with > >> > >> just a little water. > > >> > >> The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is > >> > >> regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water - > >> > >> sort of like fine tuning an IV for a Human in the hospital. Drip > >> > >> irrigation is usually cut off or reduced to promote better ripening > >> > >> near harvest time. In your theory, you would give them all the water > >> > >> they wanted. *The result would be extremely long canes with poor > >> > >> fruit. > > >> > >> Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as > >> > >> there is ample sun and water. Grapes are genetically coded to be > >> > >> climbers and reach for the sun. *When water is reduced, the grape > >> > >> vine will stop sending energy to the shoot growth and instead put > >> > >> its energy into maturing the seeds and fruit to make it more likely > >> > >> birds and other animals will eat them, spread their seeds and > >> > >> perpetuate the species. This is the only thing nature cares about - > >> > >> perpetuating the species. > > >> > >> > "You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell > >> > >> > them of > >> > >> >> your 2 brix increase revelation. " > > >> > >> > Most viticulturists are like you, they claim that grape vines grow > >> > >> > better with no water. Maybe that is why the Fench only have > >> > >> > "vintage years" every 20 years or so. > > >> > >> Tell it to the French. > > >> > >> Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. *I suppose you disagree > >> > >> with this also. > > >> > >> Publish. and have your work peer reviewed. *Most research > >> > >> viticulturists would welcome your documented research. > > >> > >> Paul > > >> > >> > "Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial > >> > >> >> growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor." > > >> > >> > And I'm sure they also fertilize. > > >> > >> NO!! most do not fertilize. > > >> > >> > If they put their mouths were their > >> > >> > money was they wouldn't feritlize. > > >> > >> They don't. > > >> > >> > BTW, fertilizer is USELESS if there > >> > >> > is no water in the soil for the roots to soak it up which blows > >> > >> > away your theory about vines growing well in "arid" regions. > > >> > >> The proof is well established. *I think you live in California, > >> > >> right? What is the climate in most of the vineyards there? *What is > >> > >> the climate in Washington State where grapes are grown. *What is the > >> > >> climate in Argentina and Chile where grapes are grown. *Vitis > >> > >> Vinifera originated in Eurasia near the Caspian and Black Sea - > >> > >> hardly a tropical paradise. > > >> > >> > While grapes > >> > >> > roots do go deep a good percentage of them are near the surface.. > > >> > >> Yep, if you water them, you will have a good amount of them near the > >> > >> surface. > > >> > >> > "You will also find many references in the literature that state > >> > >> > grapes do no > >> > >> >> like wet feet" > > >> > >> > They don't like wet feet. What they like is well drained soil > >> > >> > which by design dries out FAST. That is why mulching over optimum > >> > >> > soil is the RIGHT thing to do. > > >> > >> Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard > >> > >> differently in different rows and compare. > > >> > >> > " > > >> > >> > On Sep 3, 8:43*am, "Paul E. Lehmann" > > >> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> >> wrote: > >> > >> >> > Micheal, > > >> > >> >> > Always trust your eyes and keep observing. > > >> > >> >> The very best thing for Michael to do is an experiment where he > >> > >> >> mulches a row or rows and leaves the others unmulched and see if > >> > >> >> he gets the "2 brix" increase on the mulched rows that you claim. > >> > >> >> The thing(s) that increase brix are more sunlight and more > >> > >> >> growing degree days. *Perhaps the only thing Michael can do is > >> > >> >> cut down trees or other obstacles obstructing sunlight. > > >> > >> >> You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell > >> > >> >> them of your 2 brix increase revelation. *I am sure you could > >> > >> >> start a new trend in grape growing. > > >> > >> >> You never did answer my question that I asked in the past; where > >> > >> >> are you growing your grapes and what are you growing? > > >> > >> >> > Paul, without any proof, is > >> > >> >> > saying that what I have observed and what you have have > >> > >> >> > observed couldn't be true. > > >> > >> >> Paul at least uses his real name. > > >> > >> >> I am saying that I have no doubt that mulching will increase > >> > >> >> vigor. Increased vigor in an already vigorous situation will NOT > >> > >> >> improve grape quality. *In fact, it will do just the opposite. Do > >> > >> >> you like your wine to smell and taste like vegetables? *Here in > >> > >> >> the Mid Atlantic, commercial growers constantly strive to > >> > >> >> DECREASE vigor. > > >> > >> >> > It sounds like in your case, mulching has helped > >> > >> >> > tremendously. There are many reasons for mulch and the main > >> > >> >> > reason is that a healthy vine is a good vine. It's as simple as > >> > >> >> > that. > > >> > >> >> The French say that the best wine is made from the struggling > >> > >> >> vine. Hmmm, something to think about there, doublesb. > > >> > >> >> You will also find many references in the literature that state > >> > >> >> grapes do no like wet feet. *Grape vine roots can go VERY > > ... > > read more » |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul,
Another thing that makes no sense to me in viticulture is the difference in cold-climate and warm-climate viticulture. I may be wrong, but if the techniques used in cold-climate viticulture leave the vine healthier to survive the winter wouldn't it make since that it would leave the vine healthier in warm climates? A healthy vine is a healthy vine and healthy practices in cold climates are good in warm climates. I've also seen some Cornell trial vineyards in NY and all had black screen mulch under the vines. I personally use wood chips because I think it regulates better because it mirrors what occurs in nature more accurately, which is to breakdown and supply nutrients while forming a barrier to soak up excess water while also sealing in existing moisture. viticultureOn Sep 4, 9:08*am, wrote: > Paul, > > I would bet that where I am has recieved more rain than you and > Michael combined. I have not seen any vigor difference between this > year and and other year. Like I said, the mulch regulates the vines > very well and any water that does get to the ground is drained by the > soil thereby keeping a constant soil moisture whether it's pouring or > it hasn't rained in 2 weeks. Before I mulched there were some rows > that were a lot less vigorous than other rows. After mulching all rows > look identical. There is no percievable difference which is why I have > concluded that the mulch is a great regulator of vigor and water. BTW, > I read the article you posted and it seems to validate what I have > been talking about as far as viticulturalists. While each technique > has it's advantages in some aspect it also has disadvantages > especially for trunk size and the next year. These are crucial when > growing in cold climates. Maryland isn't a tough place to grow grapes. > In fact you probably don't need to worry too much about winter > survival. If you read the article carefully what it really suggests is > that if viticuluralists would just leave the vines alone they would be > better off. There was no mention of the final brix in the grapes of > the good fruit set and the poor fruit set. As a grower of a perenial > you constantly need to think about the future( especially since it > takes 3 years grow a new vine) along with the current situation before > making any changes to the natural evolution of the vine. I think the > articale does a good job in detailing the enormous benefits laterals > have to fruit ripeng and also trunk size and stored carbs for net > year. > > On Sep 4, 7:56*am, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > > > > > wrote: > > > Paul, > > > > What type of soil do you have down there in Maryland that promotes so > > > much vigor? > > > In my vineyard(s) I have a sandy loam. *There are a variety of soil types in > > Maryland. It is NOT THE SOIL that promotes the vigor here. *It is the > > moisture we receive. I believe the same is true in Michael's case. *The > > better years are the years that we have minimal rains during bloom and > > fruit set and then again minimal rain after verasion. > > > You refuse to mention were you are growing your grapes so I assume you are > > in California which in most cases never or very seldom experiences this > > situation. *If this is the case, you can not even begin to get an idea of > > the vigor problem without first hand experience. > > > Grapes can be grown on a variety of soil types. I suggest you read the > > book "Terroir" by James E. Wilson. *Wilson, like myself, is a Geologist. > > All of my professional career was working as a Geologist, Hydrologist and > > Physical Scientist. *I worked for a vineyard and winemaking consultant > > after retiring. > > > Just curious, what is your background? > > > > I, like Michael, grow my vines on WELL DRAINED soil. My > > > soil is sand. Not sandy loam, sand. I think what the problem is in our > > > disagreement is that Maryland doesn't really have optimum soil to grow > > > grapes to begin with so your viticultural practices are aimed at > > > correcting the biggest mistake you can make as a "expert" > > > viticuluralist, site selection. > > > > On Sep 4, 6:25*am, wrote: > > >> "As I thought, you are afraid to publish in any magazine read by and > > >> contributed to by viticulturists." > > > >> Viticuluralists are off in orbit when it comes to farming. I've had > > >> enough experience with them to know they would never make it if they > > >> had to grow something that was actually hard to grow. They end up > > >> killing more vines than they cultivate. The main reason for it is that > > >> they all think that what works in Maryland will work in England and > > >> will pound the table trying to convince you. Your insistence that > > >> Michael couldn't possibly be seeing positive effects from mulch is par > > >> for the course. > > > >> On Sep 3, 7:45*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > "Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard > > >> > > differently in > > >> > > different rows and compare" > > > >> > > He did, and he seems happy with mulch. Your the one who doesn't > > >> > > accept his observations. > > > >> > I am talking about a trial between rows in the same year!!! > > >> > Not one year compared to another. > > >> > Also, the crop is not yet in for this year. *A vigorous vine does not > > >> > mean the fruit is good. > > > >> > > "The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is > > >> > > regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water " > > > >> > > If they mulched they wouldn't need irrigation. > > > >> > Try drinking wine instead of growing and smoking wacky weed your > > >> > reasoning may be better. :-) > > > >> > > "Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as > > >> > > there > > >> > > is ample sun and water. " > > > >> > > So they do need water? > > > >> > Yes, but a LOT less than other fruits. *Ever been to Grand Junction, > > >> > Colorado, Moab Utah? *Quite a desert environment there and they grow > > >> > good fruit - WITHOUT MULCHING. > > > >> > > "Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. *I suppose you disagree > > >> > > with > > >> > > this also." > > > >> > > I wrote that mulch actually refrains vigor ( due to it absorbing the > > >> > > water) while increasing the health of the vine.. > > > >> > > "Publish. and have your work peer reviewed." > > > >> > > It's already been done. Grapes are plants. They benefit from > > >> > > mulching. > > > >> > As I thought, you are afraid to publish in any magazine read by and > > >> > contributed to by viticulturists. > > > >> > STILL no answer as to where you live and what you are growing. *Afraid > > >> > of this question? *I am also not impressed that you hide behind an > > >> > alias. > > > >> > Paul > > > >> > > On Sep 3, 4:07*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > >> wrote: > > >> > >> > " The thing(s) that increase > > >> > >> > brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days." > > > >> > >> > That is not true. If what you say is true than growing a vine in > > >> > >> > the sahara desert would yield the best grapes. > > > >> > >> I see, you STILL refuse to state your name and where you live and > > >> > >> grow grapes and which varieties you grow. > > > >> > >> Ever see an oasis in the desert? *Plants there do very well with > > >> > >> just a little water. > > > >> > >> The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is > > >> > >> regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water - > > >> > >> sort of like fine tuning an IV for a Human in the hospital. Drip > > >> > >> irrigation is usually cut off or reduced to promote better ripening > > >> > >> near harvest time. In your theory, you would give them all the water > > >> > >> they wanted. *The result would be extremely long canes with poor > > >> > >> fruit. > > > >> > >> Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as > > >> > >> there is ample sun and water. Grapes are genetically coded to be > > >> > >> climbers and reach for the sun. *When water is reduced, the grape > > >> > >> vine will stop sending energy to the shoot growth and instead put > > >> > >> its energy into maturing the seeds and fruit to make it more likely > > >> > >> birds and other animals will eat them, spread their seeds and > > >> > >> perpetuate the species. This is the only thing nature cares about - > > >> > >> perpetuating the species. > > > >> > >> > "You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell > > >> > >> > them of > > >> > >> >> your 2 brix increase revelation. " > > > >> > >> > Most viticulturists are like you, they claim that grape vines grow > > >> > >> > better with no water. Maybe that is why the Fench only have > > >> > >> > "vintage years" every 20 years or so. > > > >> > >> Tell it to the French. > > > >> > >> Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. *I suppose you disagree > > >> > >> with this also. > > > >> > >> Publish. and have your work peer reviewed. *Most research > > >> > >> viticulturists would welcome your documented research. > > > >> > >> Paul > > > >> > >> > "Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial > > >> > >> >> growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor." > > > >> > >> > And I'm sure they also fertilize. > > > >> > >> NO!! most do not fertilize. > > > >> > >> > If they put their mouths were their > > >> > >> > money was they wouldn't feritlize. > > > >> > >> They don't. > > > >> > >> > BTW, fertilizer is USELESS if there > > >> > >> > is no water in the soil for the roots to soak it up which blows > > >> > >> > away your theory about vines growing well in "arid" regions. > > > >> > >> The proof is well established. *I think you live in California, > > >> > >> right? What is the climate in most of the vineyards there? *What is > > >> > >> the climate in Washington State where grapes are grown. *What is the > > >> > >> climate in Argentina and Chile where grapes are grown. *Vitis > > >> > >> Vinifera originated in Eurasia near the Caspian and Black Sea - > > >> > >> hardly a tropical paradise. > > > >> > >> > While grapes > > >> > >> > roots do go deep a good percentage of them are near the surface. > > > >> > >> Yep, if you water them, you will have a good amount of them near the > > >> > >> surface. > > > >> > >> > "You will also find many references in the literature that state > > >> > >> > grapes do no > > >> > >> >> like wet feet" > > > >> > >> > They don't like wet feet. What they like is well drained soil > > >> > >> > which by design dries out FAST. That is why mulching over optimum > > >> > >> > soil is the RIGHT thing to do. > > > >> > >> Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard > > >> > >> differently in different rows and compare. > > > >> > >> > " > > > >> > >> > On Sep 3, 8:43*am, "Paul E. Lehmann" > > > >> > >> > wrote: > > >> > >> >> wrote: > > >> > >> >> > Micheal, > > ... > > read more » |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Sep, 13:56, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote:
> wrote: > > Paul, > > > What type of soil do you have down there in Maryland that promotes so > > much vigor? > > In my vineyard(s) I have a sandy loam. *There are a variety of soil types in > Maryland. It is NOT THE SOIL that promotes the vigor here. *It is the > moisture we receive. I believe the same is true in Michael's case. *The > better years are the years that we have minimal rains during bloom and > fruit set and then again minimal rain after verasion. > > You refuse to mention were you are growing your grapes so I assume you are > in California which in most cases never or very seldom experiences this > situation. *If this is the case, you can not even begin to get an idea of > the vigor problem without first hand experience. > > Grapes can be grown on a variety of soil types. I suggest you read the > book "Terroir" by James E. Wilson. *Wilson, like myself, is a Geologist.. > All of my professional career was working as a Geologist, Hydrologist and > Physical Scientist. *I worked for a vineyard and winemaking consultant > after retiring. > > Just curious, what is your background? > > > > > I, like Michael, grow my vines on WELL DRAINED soil. My > > soil is sand. Not sandy loam, sand. I think what the problem is in our > > disagreement is that Maryland doesn't really have optimum soil to grow > > grapes to begin with so your viticultural practices are aimed at > > correcting the biggest mistake you can make as a "expert" > > viticuluralist, site selection. > > > On Sep 4, 6:25*am, wrote: > >> "As I thought, you are afraid to publish in any magazine read by and > >> contributed to by viticulturists." > > >> Viticuluralists are off in orbit when it comes to farming. I've had > >> enough experience with them to know they would never make it if they > >> had to grow something that was actually hard to grow. They end up > >> killing more vines than they cultivate. The main reason for it is that > >> they all think that what works in Maryland will work in England and > >> will pound the table trying to convince you. Your insistence that > >> Michael couldn't possibly be seeing positive effects from mulch is par > >> for the course. > > >> On Sep 3, 7:45*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > wrote: > > >> > wrote: > >> > > "Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard > >> > > differently in > >> > > different rows and compare" > > >> > > He did, and he seems happy with mulch. Your the one who doesn't > >> > > accept his observations. > > >> > I am talking about a trial between rows in the same year!!! > >> > Not one year compared to another. > >> > Also, the crop is not yet in for this year. *A vigorous vine does not > >> > mean the fruit is good. > > >> > > "The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is > >> > > regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water " > > >> > > If they mulched they wouldn't need irrigation. > > >> > Try drinking wine instead of growing and smoking wacky weed your > >> > reasoning may be better. :-) > > >> > > "Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as > >> > > there > >> > > is ample sun and water. " > > >> > > So they do need water? > > >> > Yes, but a LOT less than other fruits. *Ever been to Grand Junction, > >> > Colorado, Moab Utah? *Quite a desert environment there and they grow > >> > good fruit - WITHOUT MULCHING. > > >> > > "Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. *I suppose you disagree > >> > > with > >> > > this also." > > >> > > I wrote that mulch actually refrains vigor ( due to it absorbing the > >> > > water) while increasing the health of the vine.. > > >> > > "Publish. and have your work peer reviewed." > > >> > > It's already been done. Grapes are plants. They benefit from > >> > > mulching. > > >> > As I thought, you are afraid to publish in any magazine read by and > >> > contributed to by viticulturists. > > >> > STILL no answer as to where you live and what you are growing. *Afraid > >> > of this question? *I am also not impressed that you hide behind an > >> > alias. > > >> > Paul > > >> > > On Sep 3, 4:07*pm, "Paul E. Lehmann" > > >> > > wrote: > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > " The thing(s) that increase > >> > >> > brix are more sunlight and more growing degree days." > > >> > >> > That is not true. If what you say is true than growing a vine in > >> > >> > the sahara desert would yield the best grapes. > > >> > >> I see, you STILL refuse to state your name and where you live and > >> > >> grow grapes and which varieties you grow. > > >> > >> Ever see an oasis in the desert? *Plants there do very well with > >> > >> just a little water. > > >> > >> The premier growing areas are those that are semi arid and water is > >> > >> regulated by drip irrigation or nature provides just enough water - > >> > >> sort of like fine tuning an IV for a Human in the hospital. Drip > >> > >> irrigation is usually cut off or reduced to promote better ripening > >> > >> near harvest time. In your theory, you would give them all the water > >> > >> they wanted. *The result would be extremely long canes with poor > >> > >> fruit. > > >> > >> Genetically grapes could care less about optimum ripening as long as > >> > >> there is ample sun and water. Grapes are genetically coded to be > >> > >> climbers and reach for the sun. *When water is reduced, the grape > >> > >> vine will stop sending energy to the shoot growth and instead put > >> > >> its energy into maturing the seeds and fruit to make it more likely > >> > >> birds and other animals will eat them, spread their seeds and > >> > >> perpetuate the species. This is the only thing nature cares about - > >> > >> perpetuating the species. > > >> > >> > "You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell > >> > >> > them of > >> > >> >> your 2 brix increase revelation. " > > >> > >> > Most viticulturists are like you, they claim that grape vines grow > >> > >> > better with no water. Maybe that is why the Fench only have > >> > >> > "vintage years" every 20 years or so. > > >> > >> Tell it to the French. > > >> > >> Excessive vigor promotes poor quality wine. *I suppose you disagree > >> > >> with this also. > > >> > >> Publish. and have your work peer reviewed. *Most research > >> > >> viticulturists would welcome your documented research. > > >> > >> Paul > > >> > >> > "Here in the Mid Atlantic, commercial > >> > >> >> growers constantly strive to DECREASE vigor." > > >> > >> > And I'm sure they also fertilize. > > >> > >> NO!! most do not fertilize. > > >> > >> > If they put their mouths were their > >> > >> > money was they wouldn't feritlize. > > >> > >> They don't. > > >> > >> > BTW, fertilizer is USELESS if there > >> > >> > is no water in the soil for the roots to soak it up which blows > >> > >> > away your theory about vines growing well in "arid" regions. > > >> > >> The proof is well established. *I think you live in California, > >> > >> right? What is the climate in most of the vineyards there? *What is > >> > >> the climate in Washington State where grapes are grown. *What is the > >> > >> climate in Argentina and Chile where grapes are grown. *Vitis > >> > >> Vinifera originated in Eurasia near the Caspian and Black Sea - > >> > >> hardly a tropical paradise. > > >> > >> > While grapes > >> > >> > roots do go deep a good percentage of them are near the surface.. > > >> > >> Yep, if you water them, you will have a good amount of them near the > >> > >> surface. > > >> > >> > "You will also find many references in the literature that state > >> > >> > grapes do no > >> > >> >> like wet feet" > > >> > >> > They don't like wet feet. What they like is well drained soil > >> > >> > which by design dries out FAST. That is why mulching over optimum > >> > >> > soil is the RIGHT thing to do. > > >> > >> Michael can easily do an experiment and grow his vineyard > >> > >> differently in different rows and compare. > > >> > >> > " > > >> > >> > On Sep 3, 8:43*am, "Paul E. Lehmann" > > >> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> >> wrote: > >> > >> >> > Micheal, > > >> > >> >> > Always trust your eyes and keep observing. > > >> > >> >> The very best thing for Michael to do is an experiment where he > >> > >> >> mulches a row or rows and leaves the others unmulched and see if > >> > >> >> he gets the "2 brix" increase on the mulched rows that you claim. > >> > >> >> The thing(s) that increase brix are more sunlight and more > >> > >> >> growing degree days. *Perhaps the only thing Michael can do is > >> > >> >> cut down trees or other obstacles obstructing sunlight. > > >> > >> >> You should send your mulching "proof" to viticulturists and tell > >> > >> >> them of your 2 brix increase revelation. *I am sure you could > >> > >> >> start a new trend in grape growing. > > >> > >> >> You never did answer my question that I asked in the past; where > >> > >> >> are you growing your grapes and what are you growing? > > >> > >> >> > Paul, without any proof, is > >> > >> >> > saying that what I have observed and what you have have > >> > >> >> > observed couldn't be true. > > >> > >> >> Paul at least uses his real name. > > >> > >> >> I am saying that I have no doubt that mulching will increase > >> > >> >> vigor. Increased vigor in an already vigorous situation will NOT > >> > >> >> improve grape quality. *In fact, it will do just the opposite. Do > >> > >> >> you like your wine to smell and taste like vegetables? *Here in > >> > >> >> the Mid Atlantic, commercial growers constantly strive to > >> > >> >> DECREASE vigor. > > >> > >> >> > It sounds like in your case, mulching has helped > >> > >> >> > tremendously. There are many reasons for mulch and the main > >> > >> >> > reason is that a healthy vine is a good vine. It's as simple as > >> > >> >> > that. > > >> > >> >> The French say that the best wine is made from the struggling > >> > >> >> vine. Hmmm, something to think about there, doublesb. > > >> > >> >> You will also find many references in the literature that state > >> > >> >> grapes do no like wet feet. *Grape vine roots can go VERY > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Dear Paul and doubi..., I am sorry to have stirred up such a hornets nest between the two of you.You have expressed some very interesting views,but I think you are commenting too much on one years experience.My experience this year has been characterised by the following, 1)I used compost(plus some fertiliser) around the vines for the first time,mainly in order to control powdery mildew. 2)My vines are already vigorous,but moreso this year.Hence my original question about pruning laterals. 3)My soil is very well drained,being limestone based on a S.facing slope.It dries out very quickly,and I was surprised that such a thin soil should produce so much vine growth. 4)The excellent fruitset this year is probably due to a very warm June. 5)The rest of the summer has been mediocre in terms of day temperature and sunshine,and there has been sufficient rain.The night time temperatures though have been above average.Hence my question about degree-days. 6) I would find it difficult to do a control test,since I only have about 5 rows of vines with four varieties.There are already differences between vines of the same type,due to position in the row and age of vine. There appears to be some very good wines made now commercially in England.Whites certainly win prizes at blind tasting international competitions and sparkling wines now rival best French champagnes.New red hybrids from Germany are also proving very successful recently.There is a view here in our cool climate that the slow ripening of the grapes into October and even November helps to produce excellent and different characteristics to the wine,and certainly different to wines produced in hot and arid conditions So,being a complete novice,I am welcoming this advice,but it is somewhat contradictory,particularly in the value of compost.Several books I read stress the value of compost in keeping the surface soil moist,and hence preventing disease,but I have also read that extreme vegetative growth will be at the expense of fruitset and quality.Maybe it really depends on the particular soil and vineyard aspect. I would welcome further comments,but please do not fall out Best regards Michael |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi:
Hate to interupt this interesting ****ing match. But wood chips are not likely the 'natural' mulch for vines. What would be, is what comes off the vines themselves plus any additional material from the support in a natural condition. I and SWMBO have never seen a wild grape in a conifer, though it may occur. But I have seen plenty in hardwoods. So based on observation a natural mulch would consist of grape leaves, canes, rotten grapes and leaves from the host support. I would be very careful with chips. Conifers and all of their by products tend to acidic, hardwoods to basic. So if one is to use other than grape by products for mulch then hardwoods might be the best source. Grape by products and hardwood leaves would more likely be much better than chips. In addition because conifers grow in generally tough conditions, ie drought during the growing season they produce chemicals that inhibit growth of other plants to reduce competition for soil nutrients, water and sunlight. Also I think the real benefit from mulch is the longterm incorporation of organics in the soils which promote water, nutrient holding capacity and better biotics for bugs, fungi and bacteria that can contribute to over all health of the vineyard. Most backyard vineyards around here grow grass right up to the vine trunks. Grass clippings are left in the vineyard along with leaves. Some chip the prunings while others pile and burn. No one I know uses chips. So dry farm, others irrigate, that is soild water capacity dependent. I see no issues with this in the health of the plant or the grape nor any need to mulch. Lastly the struggle arguement has traction for a good reason. Fruit is smaller making skin to juice ratios better for hearty reds. In addition ripening can and usually does occur sooner with the obvious advatages. Just my $0.02 Steve Oregon On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 07:20:50 -0700 (PDT), wrote: >I personally use wood chips >because I think it regulates better because it mirrors what occurs in >nature more accurately, which is to breakdown and supply nutrients >while forming a barrier to soak up excess water while also sealing in >existing moisture. |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
spud wrote:
> Hi: > > Hate to interupt this interesting ****ing match. But wood chips are > not likely the 'natural' mulch for vines. What would be, is what > comes off the vines themselves plus any additional material from the > support in a natural condition. > > I and SWMBO have never seen a wild grape in a conifer, though it may > occur. But I have seen plenty in hardwoods. So based on observation > a natural mulch would consist of grape leaves, canes, rotten grapes > and leaves from the host support. > > I would be very careful with chips. Conifers and all of their by > products tend to acidic, hardwoods to basic. So if one is to use > other than grape by products for mulch then hardwoods might be the > best source. Grape by products and hardwood leaves would more likely > be much better than chips. > > In addition because conifers grow in generally tough conditions, ie > drought during the growing season they produce chemicals that inhibit > growth of other plants to reduce competition for soil nutrients, water > and sunlight. > > Also I think the real benefit from mulch is the longterm incorporation > of organics in the soils which promote water, nutrient holding > capacity and better biotics for bugs, fungi and bacteria that can > contribute to over all health of the vineyard. > > Most backyard vineyards around here grow grass right up to the vine > trunks. Grass clippings are left in the vineyard along with leaves. > Some chip the prunings while others pile and burn. No one I know uses > chips. So dry farm, others irrigate, that is soild water capacity > dependent. I see no issues with this in the health of the plant or > the grape nor any need to mulch. > > Lastly the struggle arguement has traction for a good reason. Fruit > is smaller making skin to juice ratios better for hearty reds. In > addition ripening can and usually does occur sooner with the obvious > advatages. > > Just my $0.02 > > Steve > Oregon Thanks Steve I have used pommace in the past in my vineyard. I have quit doing so recently because I have a problem with racoons. I have to live trap and transport and release them. If I did not have the racoon problem, I would continue to use pommace around my vines. Of course they might get mad grape disease from eating their own :-) In Michael's case, if he thinks mulching is beneficial, a refelective mulch may benefit because what he seems to need in the Great Britain climate is more sunlight. I know there are reflective plastics made but they are a PITA to secure and fairly costly. doublsb's comment that growing degree days and sunlight are not the major factors contributing to brix levels, is in my opinion, showing a major lack of understand on viticulture. You live in a very beautiful state. In what part do you live? We vacationed in Oregon several years ago and it was one of our most enjoyable vacations ever. Paul > > > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 07:20:50 -0700 (PDT), wrote: > >>I personally use wood chips >>because I think it regulates better because it mirrors what occurs in >>nature more accurately, which is to breakdown and supply nutrients >>while forming a barrier to soak up excess water while also sealing in >>existing moisture. |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 4, 10:21 pm, spud > wrote:
> Hi: > > Hate to interupt this interesting ****ing match. But wood chips are > not likely the 'natural' mulch for vines. What would be, is what > comes off the vines themselves plus any additional material from the > support in a natural condition. > > I and SWMBO have never seen a wild grape in a conifer, though it may > occur. But I have seen plenty in hardwoods. So based on observation > a natural mulch would consist of grape leaves, canes, rotten grapes > and leaves from the host support. > > I would be very careful with chips. Conifers and all of their by > products tend to acidic, hardwoods to basic. So if one is to use > other than grape by products for mulch then hardwoods might be the > best source. Grape by products and hardwood leaves would more likely > be much better than chips. > > In addition because conifers grow in generally tough conditions, ie > drought during the growing season they produce chemicals that inhibit > growth of other plants to reduce competition for soil nutrients, water > and sunlight. > > Also I think the real benefit from mulch is the longterm incorporation > of organics in the soils which promote water, nutrient holding > capacity and better biotics for bugs, fungi and bacteria that can > contribute to over all health of the vineyard. > > Most backyard vineyards around here grow grass right up to the vine > trunks. Grass clippings are left in the vineyard along with leaves. > Some chip the prunings while others pile and burn. No one I know uses > chips. So dry farm, others irrigate, that is soild water capacity > dependent. I see no issues with this in the health of the plant or > the grape nor any need to mulch. > > Lastly the struggle arguement has traction for a good reason. Fruit > is smaller making skin to juice ratios better for hearty reds. In > addition ripening can and usually does occur sooner with the obvious > advatages. > > Just my $0.02 > > Steve > Oregon > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 07:20:50 -0700 (PDT), wrote: > >I personally use wood chips > >because I think it regulates better because it mirrors what occurs in > >nature more accurately, which is to breakdown and supply nutrients > >while forming a barrier to soak up excess water while also sealing in > >existing moisture. There is no question that mulch helps maintain a consistent soil moisture. Most parts of the country don't get rain as consistently as Maryland apparently does. It may come a flood and then not rain for a month in a lot of places, while 90+ degrees. Mulch will reduce the need to use water for irrigation (very important in some places). I would not use wood chips of any kind unless they had been through a compost cycle. The best mulches IMO are hay or wheat/rye/oat straw. Those may not be cost effective to obtain on a large scale unless you grow your own. Leaving grape clippings or pomace in the vineyard as mulch is not a good idea because you are leaving disease sources to spread infections. If you had black rot or mildew on your grapes, you need to get rid of as much of the infected tissue as you can that will serve as a ready disease source the next year. Especially if you aren't into spraying a lot, it would be better to rake all fallen leaves and dispose of them away from the vineyard. The custom of returning pomace to the vineyard has been associated with the spread of leaf roll virus and is no longer recommended in many places. The only negative that I have seen associated with mulch in general is that it can provide hiding places for some pest larvae (and mice, etc.). I would have to do some research to find it again, but I believe that some recommend raking mulch away to expose bare ground for a time and then recovering later so as to disrupt the life cycle of the particular insect pest. Stephen |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
shbailey wrote:
> On Sep 4, 10:21 pm, spud > wrote: >> Hi: >> >> Hate to interupt this interesting ****ing match. But wood chips are >> not likely the 'natural' mulch for vines. What would be, is what >> comes off the vines themselves plus any additional material from the >> support in a natural condition. >> >> I and SWMBO have never seen a wild grape in a conifer, though it may >> occur. But I have seen plenty in hardwoods. So based on observation >> a natural mulch would consist of grape leaves, canes, rotten grapes >> and leaves from the host support. >> >> I would be very careful with chips. Conifers and all of their by >> products tend to acidic, hardwoods to basic. So if one is to use >> other than grape by products for mulch then hardwoods might be the >> best source. Grape by products and hardwood leaves would more likely >> be much better than chips. >> >> In addition because conifers grow in generally tough conditions, ie >> drought during the growing season they produce chemicals that inhibit >> growth of other plants to reduce competition for soil nutrients, water >> and sunlight. >> >> Also I think the real benefit from mulch is the longterm incorporation >> of organics in the soils which promote water, nutrient holding >> capacity and better biotics for bugs, fungi and bacteria that can >> contribute to over all health of the vineyard. >> >> Most backyard vineyards around here grow grass right up to the vine >> trunks. Grass clippings are left in the vineyard along with leaves. >> Some chip the prunings while others pile and burn. No one I know uses >> chips. So dry farm, others irrigate, that is soild water capacity >> dependent. I see no issues with this in the health of the plant or >> the grape nor any need to mulch. >> >> Lastly the struggle arguement has traction for a good reason. Fruit >> is smaller making skin to juice ratios better for hearty reds. In >> addition ripening can and usually does occur sooner with the obvious >> advatages. >> >> Just my $0.02 >> >> Steve >> Oregon >> >> On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 07:20:50 -0700 (PDT), wrote: >> >I personally use wood chips >> >because I think it regulates better because it mirrors what occurs in >> >nature more accurately, which is to breakdown and supply nutrients >> >while forming a barrier to soak up excess water while also sealing in >> >existing moisture. > > There is no question that mulch helps maintain a consistent soil > moisture. Most parts of the country don't get rain as consistently as > Maryland apparently does. It may come a flood and then not rain for a > month in a lot of places, while 90+ degrees. Mulch will reduce the > need to use water for irrigation (very important in some places). I can see the possible benefit in such places. However, the original poster, Michael. lives in England and although I have not lived there, I believe the conditions you mentioned probably are not what he experiences on a yearly basis. Maryland occasionally has some drought periods but not lengthy and not severe enough to effect grape vines; lawns and gardens, yes, but usually not grape vines. Typically in the region, water is used in the first year and after that none or very sparingly with drip irrigation. Most use no water at all. There are ways of determining drought stress in vines, such as looking at the position of the tendrils near the shoot tips. One of the possible negatives I can see in mulching in areas such as the Mid Atlantic and possibly England is that near surface soil moisture promotes shallow roots and discourgages deep rooting. If deep rooting is encouraged, the roots find their source of moisture and nutrients. If shallow roots are the mainstay of the vine, then when droughts do occur, it is possible that the vine can be affected more because of lack of deep roots. > I would not use wood chips of any kind unless they had been through a > compost cycle. That is good information. I have read that immature mulch in the decomposition process can actually rob nutrients instead of adding. > The best mulches IMO are hay or wheat/rye/oat straw. > Those may not be cost effective to obtain on a large scale unless you > grow your own. Leaving grape clippings or pomace in the vineyard as > mulch is not a good idea because you are leaving disease sources to > spread infections. If you had black rot or mildew on your grapes, you > need to get rid of as much of the infected tissue as you can that will > serve as a ready disease source the next year. Especially if you > aren't into spraying a lot, it would be better to rake all fallen > leaves and dispose of them away from the vineyard. > The custom of > returning pomace to the vineyard has been associated with the spread > of leaf roll virus and is no longer recommended in many places. Thanks for that information. It is a good thing that I have not been doing it the last several years. > > The only negative that I have seen associated with mulch in general is > that it can provide hiding places for some pest larvae (and mice, > etc.). I would have to do some research to find it again, but I > believe that some recommend raking mulch away to expose bare ground > for a time and then recovering later so as to disrupt the life cycle > of the particular insect pest. I am very careful to rack my vineyard thoroughly in the spring. As I stated previously, I also think it is good practice to spray fungicides AFTER the harvest until leaf fall to reduce the innoculum prior to next spring's budbreak. I think that perhaps, depending on the mulch, it can lower soil temperature which may not be in the best interest of the vine. It may also, again depending on the material, reduce the reflectivity of the light under the canopy. I hope Michael does some controlled experiments by mulching some rows and not others on a yearly basis and gives us feedback on his results. > > Stephen |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
> One of the possible negatives I can see in mulching in areas such as the Mid
> Atlantic and possibly England is that near surface soil moisture promotes > shallow roots and discourgages deep rooting. If deep rooting is > encouraged, the roots find their source of moisture and nutrients. If > shallow roots are the mainstay of the vine, then when droughts do occur, it > is possible that the vine can be affected more because of lack of deep > roots. I don't know if mulch has any negative affects on deep rooting or not. It certainly would have less impact in that way than using drip irrigation on bare ground. If you lost your ability to irrigate, then you would be in trouble. > I hope Michael does some controlled experiments by mulching some rows and > not others on a yearly basis and gives us feedback on his results. That is a good idea for Michael to do experiments. Michael's limestone soil may be the key to his vines doing as well as they do without mulch. Permeable limestone allows the roots to penetrate deeply to reach subsurface water. If the species/rootstock used is compatible with limey soils, this is a major factor. That is the only way the French get away with the haphazard way they grow grapes. Many soils may not allow root penetration, no matter which variety is being grown. Most hybrids with American species do not like high pH soils, unless on specially selected rootstocks. Stephen |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
shbailey wrote:
>> One of the possible negatives I can see in mulching in areas such as the >> Mid Atlantic and possibly England is that near surface soil moisture >> promotes >> shallow roots and discourgages deep rooting. If deep rooting is >> encouraged, the roots find their source of moisture and nutrients. If >> shallow roots are the mainstay of the vine, then when droughts do occur, >> it is possible that the vine can be affected more because of lack of deep >> roots. > > I don't know if mulch has any negative affects on deep rooting or > not. It certainly would have less impact in that way than using drip > irrigation on bare ground. If you lost your ability to irrigate, then > you would be in trouble. > >> I hope Michael does some controlled experiments by mulching some rows and >> not others on a yearly basis and gives us feedback on his results. > > That is a good idea for Michael to do experiments. Michael's > limestone soil may be the key to his vines doing as well as they do > without mulch. Permeable limestone allows the roots to penetrate > deeply to reach subsurface water. If the species/rootstock used is > compatible with limey soils, this is a major factor. > That is the only > way the French get away with the haphazard way they grow grapes. I have not toured French vineyards. What is the haphazard way they grow grapes? Not disputing what you say, just curious. > Many > soils may not allow root penetration, no matter which variety is being > grown. Most hybrids with American species do not like high pH soils, > unless on specially selected rootstocks. > > Stephen In my limited experience with hybrids, it is better to grow them on rootstock. I know, for example that Chambourcin self rooted is much less drought tolerant than those on rootstock. The self rooted ones do not develop a deep root system. |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > I have not toured French vineyards. What is the haphazard way they grow > grapes? Not disputing what you say, just curious. > I haven't been there personally, but apparently some plant them somewhat randomly at high density (no distinct rows) and on steep hillsides with no irrigation. |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Paul Southern part of the state, the Rogue Valley. Lots of different kind of landscapes here, not quite as varied as Calif. but plenty to see in Oregon for sure. Tale Care, Steve Oregon > > >You live in a very beautiful state. In what part do you live? We >vacationed in Oregon several years ago and it was one of our most enjoyable >vacations ever. > >Paul |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 06:27:56 -0700 (PDT), shbailey
> wrote: >The best mulches IMO are hay or wheat/rye/oat straw. >Those may not be cost effective to obtain on a large scale unless you >grow your own. If a vineyard is grassed up then leaving the clippings is muching with hay. You ARE growning your own! >Leaving grape clippings or pomace in the vineyard as >mulch is not a good idea because you are leaving disease sources to >spread infections. If you had black rot or mildew on your grapes, you >need to get rid of as much of the infected tissue as you can that will >serve as a ready disease source the next year. In the short run I have no doubt you are quite correct. My comments though were specifically what is likely the natural mulch for a grape. Regarding mildew we do have powdery mildew here. It overwinters in the buds and is distributed at bud break. I'm an old forester never have been a farmer. I guess I look at the grapes differently. How do I allow a situation, a micro biome that my non-native vinifera can survive. I don't feel the need to whip them in to submission by worry and tinker. A little diesease a few bugs don't make me panic as long as my footprints say the survivability of the plant is not in jepordy. That is a long term objective, like growing trees. If the problem is big then the reaction is big. But the objective is to allow a place where the alien vinifera can be sustained. A truly different perspective than creating a controled environment in which the grapes can be free from harm. Maybe if I was doing this for a living instead of a hobby I would act more conservatively. Adhearing to what is universal and avoiding that which /might/ be detrimental. But, each vineyard has it's own personality and demons and the viticulturist must deal with each as they come. Will I screw up, I'm counting on it. But until the grapes tell me it's a mistake here in the vineyard I /have/ to leave grape mulch under the grape plants. Because, that is naturally what grapes do (most plants for that matter), to capture their place in the landscape. |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
shbailey wrote:
> >> I have not toured French vineyards. What is the haphazard way they grow >> grapes? Not disputing what you say, just curious. >> > > I haven't been there personally, but apparently some plant them > somewhat randomly at high density (no distinct rows) and on steep > hillsides with no irrigation. I think high density is common but they are cropped so that they do not yield that much fruit per vine. This is to increase competition between vines. I think that usually the yield is kept to what converts to be about 3 tons per acre or somewhat less in our units of measurement. I also think head pruning is still common in some areas over there so one would not necessarily need "rows" with trellising wires. There is a trend here in the Mid Atlantic area to grow on close spacing - about 3 feet between vines and cane prune. |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
spud wrote:
> > Paul > > Southern part of the state, the Rogue Valley. Lots of different kind > of landscapes here, not quite as varied as Calif. but plenty to see in > Oregon for sure. > > Tale Care, > > Steve > Oregon That is a VERY beautiful area. I visited that area. You are very fortunate to be living there. > >> >> >>You live in a very beautiful state. In what part do you live? We >>vacationed in Oregon several years ago and it was one of our most >>enjoyable vacations ever. >> >>Paul |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"But wood chips are
not likely the 'natural' mulch for vines. What would be, is what comes off the vines themselves plus any additional material from the support in a natural condition. " Wood chips are made mostly of carbon. Just like leaves on a vine. They don't rob nitrogen from the soil. They also don't put poisons into the soil in fact, if ypu mulched with wood chips from a b;ack walnut you would still see tremendous benefits.Wood chips have few seeds that is why it is a good mulch and when I say natuaral I should have said organic. I also notice that putting must out in the vineyard causes weed comprised of small grapevines. On Sep 4, 10:21*pm, spud > wrote: > Hi: > > Hate to interupt this interesting ****ing match. *But wood chips are > not likely the 'natural' mulch for vines. *What would be, is what > comes off the vines themselves plus any additional material from the > support in a natural condition. * > > I and SWMBO have never seen a wild grape in a conifer, though it may > occur. *But I have seen plenty in hardwoods. *So based on observation > a natural mulch would consist of grape leaves, canes, rotten grapes > and leaves from the host support. * * * > > I would be very careful with chips. *Conifers and all of their by > products tend to acidic, hardwoods to basic. *So if one is to use > other than grape by products for mulch then hardwoods might be the > best source. *Grape by products and hardwood leaves would more likely > be much better than chips. > > In addition because conifers grow in generally tough conditions, ie > drought during the growing season they produce chemicals that inhibit > growth of other plants to reduce competition for soil nutrients, water > and sunlight. * > > Also I think the real benefit from mulch is the longterm incorporation > of organics in the soils which promote water, nutrient holding > capacity and better biotics for bugs, fungi and bacteria that can > contribute to over all health of the vineyard. * > > Most backyard vineyards around here grow grass right up to the vine > trunks. *Grass clippings are left in the vineyard along with leaves. > Some chip the prunings while others pile and burn. *No one I know uses > chips. * So dry farm, others irrigate, that is soild water capacity > dependent. *I see no issues with this in the health of the plant or > the grape nor any need to mulch. * * * * > > Lastly the struggle arguement has traction for a good reason. *Fruit > is smaller making skin to juice ratios better for hearty reds. *In > addition ripening can and usually does occur sooner with the obvious > advatages. * > > Just my $0.02 > > Steve > Oregon > > > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 07:20:50 -0700 (PDT), wrote: > >I personally use wood chips > >because I think it regulates better because it mirrors what occurs in > >nature more accurately, which is to breakdown and supply nutrients > >while forming a barrier to soak up excess water while also sealing in > >existing moisture. |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael,
Here's an observation that I have made. The growers who use mulch are very happy with it and the growers who have absolutely no experience with it are saying it's bad. Like I said, just keep observing. On Sep 8, 5:53*am, wrote: > "But wood chips are > not likely the 'natural' mulch for vines. *What would be, is what > comes off the vines themselves plus any additional material from the > support in a natural condition. *" > > Wood chips are made mostly of carbon. Just like leaves on a vine. They > don't rob nitrogen from the soil. They also don't put poisons into the > soil in fact, if ypu mulched with wood chips from a b;ack walnut you > would still see tremendous benefits.Wood chips have few seeds that is > why it is a good mulch and when I say natuaral I should have said > organic. I also notice that putting must out in the vineyard causes > weed comprised of small grapevines. > > On Sep 4, 10:21*pm, spud > wrote: > > > > > Hi: > > > Hate to interupt this interesting ****ing match. *But wood chips are > > not likely the 'natural' mulch for vines. *What would be, is what > > comes off the vines themselves plus any additional material from the > > support in a natural condition. * > > > I and SWMBO have never seen a wild grape in a conifer, though it may > > occur. *But I have seen plenty in hardwoods. *So based on observation > > a natural mulch would consist of grape leaves, canes, rotten grapes > > and leaves from the host support. * * * > > > I would be very careful with chips. *Conifers and all of their by > > products tend to acidic, hardwoods to basic. *So if one is to use > > other than grape by products for mulch then hardwoods might be the > > best source. *Grape by products and hardwood leaves would more likely > > be much better than chips. > > > In addition because conifers grow in generally tough conditions, ie > > drought during the growing season they produce chemicals that inhibit > > growth of other plants to reduce competition for soil nutrients, water > > and sunlight. * > > > Also I think the real benefit from mulch is the longterm incorporation > > of organics in the soils which promote water, nutrient holding > > capacity and better biotics for bugs, fungi and bacteria that can > > contribute to over all health of the vineyard. * > > > Most backyard vineyards around here grow grass right up to the vine > > trunks. *Grass clippings are left in the vineyard along with leaves. > > Some chip the prunings while others pile and burn. *No one I know uses > > chips. * So dry farm, others irrigate, that is soild water capacity > > dependent. *I see no issues with this in the health of the plant or > > the grape nor any need to mulch. * * * * > > > Lastly the struggle arguement has traction for a good reason. *Fruit > > is smaller making skin to juice ratios better for hearty reds. *In > > addition ripening can and usually does occur sooner with the obvious > > advatages. * > > > Just my $0.02 > > > Steve > > Oregon > > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 07:20:50 -0700 (PDT), wrote: > > >I personally use wood chips > > >because I think it regulates better because it mirrors what occurs in > > >nature more accurately, which is to breakdown and supply nutrients > > >while forming a barrier to soak up excess water while also sealing in > > >existing moisture. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Thinning over thick marmalade | General Cooking | |||
Thinning of vertical shoots and mulching | Winemaking | |||
Tying in of vertical shoots | Winemaking | |||
Spring cluster thinning | Winemaking | |||
thinning the vine in spring | Winemaking |