Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Cwdjrx _
 
Posts: n/a
Default TN Corton-Charlemagne 1992, L. Latour

Latour's 92 Corton-Charlemagne now is light yellow. It has an intense
bouquet for a white Burgundy, but it is a bit more fruity and less
mineral in character than I find in the best examples of this wine from
Latour. It has now smoothed, and has a medium finish. The main problem
is that it is a bit heavy and not as refined in style as are the best
examples. I think it should be drunk fairly soon. It is above average,
but not up to Latour's best. For example, I still have some of Latour's
1976. It is a considerably better wine in nearly every way, is better
balanced, and has a complex mineral character as well as good fruit and
acidity. The 1976 evolved slower than the 1992, and probably will be in
a better shape in a few years than the 1992. When everything is right,
Corton-Charlemagne can be a very long lived white Burgundy and sometimes
can last longer than some good examples of red Burgundy.

  #2 (permalink)   Report Post  
Marc CAMERON
 
Posts: n/a
Default TN Corton-Charlemagne 1992, L. Latour

Dear All

The 1976 vintage was an exceptional vintage with a long hot summer producing
high alcohol strong concentrated wine that was only balanced out by
the wine makers adding acidity. This is why it ages so well. I have drunk
some Chablis Premier Cru Montée de Tonnerre 1976 which is superb. Your
comment at the end about White Burgundy wine ageing better then red is
something I hear a lot and from what I have tasted I would agree.

Marc

"Cwdjrx _" > a écrit dans le message de
...
> Latour's 92 Corton-Charlemagne now is light yellow. It has an intense
> bouquet for a white Burgundy, but it is a bit more fruity and less
> mineral in character than I find in the best examples of this wine from
> Latour. It has now smoothed, and has a medium finish. The main problem
> is that it is a bit heavy and not as refined in style as are the best
> examples. I think it should be drunk fairly soon. It is above average,
> but not up to Latour's best. For example, I still have some of Latour's
> 1976. It is a considerably better wine in nearly every way, is better
> balanced, and has a complex mineral character as well as good fruit and
> acidity. The 1976 evolved slower than the 1992, and probably will be in
> a better shape in a few years than the 1992. When everything is right,
> Corton-Charlemagne can be a very long lived white Burgundy and sometimes
> can last longer than some good examples of red Burgundy.
>



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1997 Louis Latour Corton Charlemagne Bi!! Wine 2 11-06-2014 07:45 PM
TN:Corton-Charlemagne 1992, Domaine Louis Latour and others cwdjrxyz Wine 2 30-11-2010 08:47 PM
TN Corton-Charlemagne 1992, Domaine Louis Latour cwdjrxyz Wine 3 07-03-2007 09:43 PM
TN Corton-Charlemagne 1976 Louis Latour [email protected] Wine 3 13-12-2005 06:46 AM
TN Corton-Charlemagne 1992, L. Latour Cwdjrx _ Wine 0 08-02-2005 12:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"