Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
declining to answer questions and perform things which he
has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
afraid to even attempt include:

1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
can not experience

2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights

3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"

4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living

5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life

6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
from their elimination objective

7. describe any emotion(s) through language

8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
better lives for food animals.

9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
than another.

10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.

11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
disappointment, if there are any.

12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
to the elimination of domestic animals.

13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be experiencing
certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger those
particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.

14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.

15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can get
from a dog

Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
and again.

dh@. wrote:
> Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> afraid to even attempt include:
>
> 1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> can not experience
>
> 2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>
> 3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>
> 4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>
> 5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>
> 6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> from their elimination objective
>
> 7. describe any emotion(s) through language
>
> 8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> better lives for food animals.
>
> 9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> than another.
>
> 10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
>
> 11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> disappointment, if there are any.
>
> 12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
> to the elimination of domestic animals.
>
> 13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be experiencing
> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger those
> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
>
> 14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
>
> 15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can get
> from a dog
>
> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
> and again.



He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".

LOL!!!

"Ron" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
>
> dh@. wrote:
> > Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> > and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> > himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> > declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> > has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> > afraid to even attempt include:
> >
> > 1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> > can not experience
> >
> > 2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
> >
> > 3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
> >
> > 4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
> >
> > 5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
> >
> > 6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> > disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> > from their elimination objective
> >
> > 7. describe any emotion(s) through language
> >
> > 8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> > better lives for food animals.
> >
> > 9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> > than another.
> >
> > 10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
> > other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
> >
> > 11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> > disappointment, if there are any.
> >
> > 12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
> > to the elimination of domestic animals.
> >
> > 13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be experiencing
> > certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger
those
> > particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
> >
> > 14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
> >
> > 15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can get
> > from a dog
> >
> > Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
> > and again.
>
>
>
> He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
>
> LOL!!!

He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
cartoon dog. )

Scented Nectar wrote:

> "Ron" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
>
>>
>>dh@. wrote:
>>
>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
>>>afraid to even attempt include:
>>>
>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
>>> can not experience
>>>
>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>>>
>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>>>
>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>>>
>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>>>
>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
>>> from their elimination objective
>>>
>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
>>>
>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
>>> better lives for food animals.
>>>
>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
>>> than another.
>>>
>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
>>>
>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
>>> disappointment, if there are any.
>>>
>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
>>>
>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be experiencing
>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger
>
> those
>
>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
>>>
>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
>>>
>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can get
>>> from a dog
>>>
>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
>>>and again.
>>
>>
>>
>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
>>
>>LOL!!!
>
>
> He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
> cartoon dog. )

You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried,
childless, degreeless, scut-working marginal.

"Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
k.net...
> Scented Nectar wrote:
>
> > "Ron" > wrote in message
> > oups.com...
> >
> >>
> >>dh@. wrote:
> >>
> >>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> >>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> >>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> >>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> >>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> >>>afraid to even attempt include:
> >>>
> >>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> >>> can not experience
> >>>
> >>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
> >>>
> >>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
> >>>
> >>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
> >>>
> >>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
> >>>
> >>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> >>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> >>> from their elimination objective
> >>>
> >>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
> >>>
> >>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> >>> better lives for food animals.
> >>>
> >>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> >>> than another.
> >>>
> >>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
> >>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
> >>>
> >>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> >>> disappointment, if there are any.
> >>>
> >>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
> >>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
> >>>
> >>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be experiencing
> >>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger
> >
> > those
> >
> >>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
> >>>
> >>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
> >>>
> >>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can get
> >>> from a dog
> >>>
> >>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
> >>>and again.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
> >>
> >>LOL!!!
> >
> >
> > He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
> > cartoon dog. )
>
> You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried,
> childless, degreeless, scut-working marginal.

Still fishing. And still throwing
rage fits. Is that any way for
for a normal person to behave?
Er, I mean dog, woof woof.


--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button.

Scented Nectar wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> k.net...
>
>>Scented Nectar wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Ron" > wrote in message
egroups.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>dh@. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
>>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
>>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
>>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
>>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
>>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
>>>>>
>>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
>>>>> can not experience
>>>>>
>>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>>>>>
>>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>>>>>
>>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>>>>>
>>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>>>>>
>>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
>>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
>>>>> from their elimination objective
>>>>>
>>>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
>>>>>
>>>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
>>>>> better lives for food animals.
>>>>>
>>>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
>>>>> than another.
>>>>>
>>>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
>>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
>>>>>
>>>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
>>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
>>>>>
>>>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
>>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
>>>>>
>>>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be experiencing
>>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger
>>>
>>>those
>>>
>>>
>>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
>>>>>
>>>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
>>>>>
>>>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can get
>>>>> from a dog
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
>>>>>and again.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
>>>>
>>>>LOL!!!
>>>
>>>
>>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
>>>cartoon dog. )
>>
>>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried,
>>childless, degreeless, scut-working marginal.
>
>
> Still fishing.

Nope. I have all the facts.

Rudy Canoza wrote:
> Scented Nectar wrote:
>
>> "Ron" > wrote in message
>> oups.com...
>>
>>>
>>> dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>> Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
>>>> and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
>>>> himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
>>>> declining to answer questions and perform things which he
>>>> has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
>>>> afraid to even attempt include:
>>>>
>>>> 1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
>>>> can not experience
>>>>
>>>> 2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>>>>
>>>> 3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>>>>
>>>> 4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>>>>
>>>> 5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>>>>
>>>> 6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
>>>> from their elimination objective
>>>>
>>>> 7. describe any emotion(s) through language
>>>>
>>>> 8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
>>>> better lives for food animals.
>>>>
>>>> 9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
>>>> than another.
>>>>
>>>> 10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
>>>>
>>>> 11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
>>>>
>>>> 12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
>>>>
>>>> 13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be experiencing
>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger
>>
>>
>> those
>>
>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
>>>>
>>>> 14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
>>>>
>>>> 15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can get
>>>> from a dog
>>>>
>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
>>>> and again.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
>>>
>>> LOL!!!
>>
>>
>>
>> He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
>> cartoon dog. )
>
>
> You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried, childless,
> degreeless, scut-working marginal.

....who takes the bus because she has no car.

"usual suspect" > wrote in message
...
> Rudy Canoza wrote:
> > Scented Nectar wrote:
> >
> >> "Ron" > wrote in message
> >> oups.com...
> >>
> >>>
> >>> dh@. wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> >>>> and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> >>>> himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> >>>> declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> >>>> has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> >>>> afraid to even attempt include:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> >>>> can not experience
> >>>>
> >>>> 2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
> >>>>
> >>>> 3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
> >>>>
> >>>> 4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
> >>>>
> >>>> 5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
> >>>>
> >>>> 6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> >>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> >>>> from their elimination objective
> >>>>
> >>>> 7. describe any emotion(s) through language
> >>>>
> >>>> 8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> >>>> better lives for food animals.
> >>>>
> >>>> 9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> >>>> than another.
> >>>>
> >>>> 10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
> >>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
> >>>>
> >>>> 11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> >>>> disappointment, if there are any.
> >>>>
> >>>> 12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
> >>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
> >>>>
> >>>> 13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be
experiencing
> >>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger
> >>
> >>
> >> those
> >>
> >>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
> >>>>
> >>>> 14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
> >>>>
> >>>> 15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can
get
> >>>> from a dog
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
> >>>> and again.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
> >>>
> >>> LOL!!!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
> >> cartoon dog. )
> >
> >
> > You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried, childless,
> > degreeless, scut-working marginal.
>
> ...who takes the bus because she has no car.

Your need to fish is pathetic.


--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button.

On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:36:24 -0400, dh@. wrote:

> Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
>afraid to even attempt include:
>
>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> can not experience
>
>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>
>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>
>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>
>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>
>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> from their elimination objective
>
>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
>
>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> better lives for food animals.
>
>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> than another.
>
>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
>
>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> disappointment, if there are any.
>
>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
> to the elimination of domestic animals.
>
>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be experiencing
> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger those
> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
>
>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
>
>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can get
> from a dog

16. explaining what--if anything at all--he has learned from experience
with animals

dh@. wrote:

> [shit, as usual]

Just stop, ****wit.

Rudy Canoza wrote:
> dh@. wrote:
>
> > [shit, as usual]
>
> Just stop, ****wit.


Yeh, everybody take it easy. The coolest little cucumber on the
internet is about to blow a gasket.

On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 05:38:37 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:

>dh@. wrote:
>
>> [shit, as usual]
>
>Just stop, ****wit.

We're accumulating more examples for your "cowardice"
postings Goo.

Fish. Fish are able to anticipate. Carp learn to hang out in
certain areas, like by lakeside bars and restaurants, anticipating
the food people sometimes drop in to them. A fact like that might
shut your little crumb of "brain" right down Goob, or maybe it will
just bounce off like all the rest of them, but it's a fact regardless
of your inability to understand it.

Goo ****wit David Harrison, THE Goo, wrote:

> On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 05:38:37 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>
>
>>dh@. wrote:
>>
>>
>>>[shit, as usual]
>>
>>Just stop, ****wit.
>
>
> We're accumulating more examples

Of your stupidity, ****wit.

On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 00:10:46 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:

>Goo ****wit David Harrison, THE Goo, wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 05:38:37 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>[shit, as usual]
>>>
>>>Just stop, ****wit.
>>
>>
>> We're accumulating more examples
>
>Of your stupidity, ****wit.

No Goo. They are examples of your stupidity. Many if not all
animals can anticipate, and we have plenty of examples of it
by now. I have even shown that fish can and do anticipate,
though you are too stupid to understand.