Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
declining to answer questions and perform things which he
has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
afraid to even attempt include:

1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
can not experience

2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights

3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"

4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living

5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life

6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
from their elimination objective

In reply to requests regarding clarification of these most
significant issues which Goobernicus has lied about repeatedly,
he has been able to do nothing but cowardly crawl away from
any attempt to explain, whimpering and crying pathetically as he
slinks away from that which he shamefully is not able to do.

While it may be true that the Gonad is not everyone's goober,
he most certainly is mine.

On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:05:40 -0400, dh@. wrote:

> Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
>afraid to even attempt include:
>
>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> can not experience
>
>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>
>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>
>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>
>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>
>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> from their elimination objective

7. describe any emotion(s) through language

> In reply to requests regarding clarification of these most
>significant issues which Goobernicus has lied about repeatedly,
>he has been able to do nothing but cowardly crawl away from
>any attempt to explain, whimpering and crying pathetically as he
>slinks away from that which he shamefully is not able to do.
>
> While it may be true that the Gonad is not everyone's goober,
>he most certainly is mine.

Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved once again.

****wit David Harrison, cracker homo of Buford, GA, wrote:

> On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:05:40 -0400, dh@. wrote:

Nothing.

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:57:37 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:05:40 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>> Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
>>afraid to even attempt include:
>>
>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
>> can not experience
>>
>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>>
>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>>
>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>>
>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>>
>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
>> from their elimination objective
>
>7. describe any emotion(s) through language

8. explain any way(s) in which people could contribute to
better lives for food animals.

Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved once again.

Found scrawled in the outhouse on Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:20:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:57:37 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:05:40 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>
>>> Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
>>>afraid to even attempt include:
>>>
>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
>>> can not experience
>>>
>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>>>
>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>>>
>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>>>
>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>>>
>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
>>> from their elimination objective
>>
>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
>
>8. explain any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> better lives for food animals.
>
> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved once again.

Jesus, ****wit! You are describing yourself to a "T" - not Rudy! Ask your therapist to
increase your sessions to at least 3 times a week, *with* med checks!

Jeers 2 U,

Leslie
"Only two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity.
And I'm not sure about the former.".... Albert Einstein

On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 13:17:42 -0600, Leslie > wrote:

>Found scrawled in the outhouse on Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:20:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:57:37 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:05:40 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>> Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
>>>>
>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
>>>> can not experience
>>>>
>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>>>>
>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>>>>
>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>>>>
>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>>>>
>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
>>>> from their elimination objective
>>>
>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
>>
>>8. explain any way(s) in which people could contribute to
>> better lives for food animals.
>>
>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved once again.
>
>Jesus, ****wit! You are describing yourself to a "T" - not Rudy!

LOL!!!! You can't save your hero. He is a coward, made even
more obvious by your pathetic attempt to save him, and even
MORE obvious by the fact that he needs to be saved. But he
is too cowardly to get out of it, as he proves every day.

dh@. wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 13:17:42 -0600, Leslie > wrote:
>
>
>>Found scrawled in the outhouse on Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:20:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:57:37 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:05:40 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
>>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
>>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
>>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
>>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
>>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
>>>>>
>>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
>>>>> can not experience
>>>>>
>>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>>>>>
>>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>>>>>
>>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>>>>>
>>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>>>>>
>>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
>>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
>>>>> from their elimination objective
>>>>
>>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
>>>
>>>8. explain any way(s) in which people could contribute to
>>> better lives for food animals.
>>>
>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved once again.
>>
>>Jesus, ****wit! You are describing yourself to a "T" - not Rudy!
>
>
> LOL!!!!

You described yourself, ****wit.

On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:20:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:57:37 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:05:40 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>
>>> Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
>>>afraid to even attempt include:
>>>
>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
>>> can not experience
>>>
>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>>>
>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>>>
>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>>>
>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>>>
>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
>>> from their elimination objective
>>
>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
>
>8. explain any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> better lives for food animals.

9. explain why one emotion is more difficult to experience
than another.

> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved once again.

On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 12:40:58 -0400, dh@. wrote:

>On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:20:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:57:37 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:05:40 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>> Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
>>>>
>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
>>>> can not experience
>>>>
>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>>>>
>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>>>>
>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>>>>
>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>>>>
>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
>>>> from their elimination objective
>>>
>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
>>
>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
>> better lives for food animals.
>
>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> than another.

10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.

11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
disappointment, if there are any.

12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
to the elimination of domestic animals.

13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be experiencing
certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger those
particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.

>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved once again.

dh@. wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 13:17:42 -0600, Leslie > wrote:
>
> >Found scrawled in the outhouse on Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:20:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
> >
> >>On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:57:37 -0400, dh@. wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:05:40 -0400, dh@. wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> >>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> >>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> >>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> >>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> >>>>afraid to even attempt include:
> >>>>
> >>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> >>>> can not experience
> >>>>
> >>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
> >>>>
> >>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
> >>>>
> >>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
> >>>>
> >>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
> >>>>
> >>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> >>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> >>>> from their elimination objective
> >>>
> >>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
> >>
> >>8. explain any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> >> better lives for food animals.
> >>
> >> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved once again.
> >
> >Jesus, ****wit! You are describing yourself to a "T" - not Rudy!
>
> LOL!!!! You can't save your hero. He is a coward, made even
> more obvious by your pathetic attempt to save him, and even
> MORE obvious by the fact that he needs to be saved. But he
> is too cowardly to get out of it, as he proves every day.



that's our ~jonnie~!

Pathetic little goober that he is, I might even miss him if his next
convulsive fit kills him.

On 9 Jul 2005 11:22:14 -0700, "Ron" > wrote:

>
>
>dh@. wrote:
>> On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 13:17:42 -0600, Leslie > wrote:
>>
>> >Found scrawled in the outhouse on Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:20:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>> >
>> >>On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:57:37 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:05:40 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
>> >>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
>> >>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
>> >>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
>> >>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
>> >>>>afraid to even attempt include:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
>> >>>> can not experience
>> >>>>
>> >>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>> >>>>
>> >>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>> >>>>
>> >>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>> >>>>
>> >>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>> >>>>
>> >>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
>> >>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
>> >>>> from their elimination objective
>> >>>
>> >>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
>> >>
>> >>8. explain any way(s) in which people could contribute to
>> >> better lives for food animals.
>> >>
>> >> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved once again.
>> >
>> >Jesus, ****wit! You are describing yourself to a "T" - not Rudy!
>>
>> LOL!!!! You can't save your hero. He is a coward, made even
>> more obvious by your pathetic attempt to save him, and even
>> MORE obvious by the fact that he needs to be saved. But he
>> is too cowardly to get out of it, as he proves every day.
>
>
>
>that's our ~jonnie~!
>
>Pathetic little goober that he is, I might even miss him if his next
>convulsive fit kills him.

LOL! By now he's contaminated the ngs to the point that there
wouldn't be much of anyone left if Goo quit posting. It sux.

Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
declining to answer questions and perform things which he
has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
afraid to even attempt include:

1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
can not experience

2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights

3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"

4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living

5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life

6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
from their elimination objective

7. describe any emotion(s) through language

8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
better lives for food animals.

9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
than another.

10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.

11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
disappointment, if there are any.

12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
to the elimination of domestic animals.

13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be experiencing
certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger those
particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.

14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.

Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
and again.