FoodBanter.com

FoodBanter.com (https://www.foodbanter.com/)
-   Vegan (https://www.foodbanter.com/vegan/)
-   -   The cowardice of Goo (updated) (https://www.foodbanter.com/vegan/65431-cowardice-goo-updated.html)

dh@. 17-07-2005 06:36 PM

The cowardice of Goo (updated)
 
Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
declining to answer questions and perform things which he
has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
afraid to even attempt include:

1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
can not experience

2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights

3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"

4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living

5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life

6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
from their elimination objective

7. describe any emotion(s) through language

8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
better lives for food animals.

9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
than another.

10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.

11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
disappointment, if there are any.

12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
to the elimination of domestic animals.

13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be experiencing
certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger those
particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.

14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.

15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can get
from a dog

Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
and again.

Ron 18-07-2005 07:11 PM



dh@. wrote:
> Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> afraid to even attempt include:
>
> 1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> can not experience
>
> 2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>
> 3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>
> 4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>
> 5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>
> 6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> from their elimination objective
>
> 7. describe any emotion(s) through language
>
> 8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> better lives for food animals.
>
> 9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> than another.
>
> 10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
>
> 11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> disappointment, if there are any.
>
> 12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
> to the elimination of domestic animals.
>
> 13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be experiencing
> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger those
> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
>
> 14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
>
> 15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can get
> from a dog
>
> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
> and again.




He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".

LOL!!!


Scented Nectar 19-07-2005 05:55 AM

"Ron" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
>
> dh@. wrote:
> > Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> > and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> > himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> > declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> > has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> > afraid to even attempt include:
> >
> > 1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> > can not experience
> >
> > 2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
> >
> > 3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
> >
> > 4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
> >
> > 5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
> >
> > 6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> > disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> > from their elimination objective
> >
> > 7. describe any emotion(s) through language
> >
> > 8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> > better lives for food animals.
> >
> > 9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> > than another.
> >
> > 10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
> > other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
> >
> > 11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> > disappointment, if there are any.
> >
> > 12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
> > to the elimination of domestic animals.
> >
> > 13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be experiencing
> > certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger

those
> > particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
> >
> > 14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
> >
> > 15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can get
> > from a dog
> >
> > Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
> > and again.

>
>
>
> He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
>
> LOL!!!


He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
cartoon dog. :))




Rudy Canoza 19-07-2005 06:50 AM

Scented Nectar wrote:

> "Ron" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
>
>>
>>dh@. wrote:
>>
>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
>>>afraid to even attempt include:
>>>
>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
>>> can not experience
>>>
>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>>>
>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>>>
>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>>>
>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>>>
>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
>>> from their elimination objective
>>>
>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
>>>
>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
>>> better lives for food animals.
>>>
>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
>>> than another.
>>>
>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
>>>
>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
>>> disappointment, if there are any.
>>>
>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
>>>
>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be experiencing
>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger

>
> those
>
>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
>>>
>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
>>>
>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can get
>>> from a dog
>>>
>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
>>>and again.

>>
>>
>>
>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
>>
>>LOL!!!

>
>
> He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
> cartoon dog. :))


You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried,
childless, degreeless, scut-working marginal.

Scented Nectar 19-07-2005 07:59 AM

"Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
k.net...
> Scented Nectar wrote:
>
> > "Ron" > wrote in message
> > oups.com...
> >
> >>
> >>dh@. wrote:
> >>
> >>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> >>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> >>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> >>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> >>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> >>>afraid to even attempt include:
> >>>
> >>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> >>> can not experience
> >>>
> >>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
> >>>
> >>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
> >>>
> >>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
> >>>
> >>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
> >>>
> >>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> >>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> >>> from their elimination objective
> >>>
> >>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
> >>>
> >>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> >>> better lives for food animals.
> >>>
> >>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> >>> than another.
> >>>
> >>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
> >>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
> >>>
> >>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> >>> disappointment, if there are any.
> >>>
> >>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
> >>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
> >>>
> >>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be experiencing
> >>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger

> >
> > those
> >
> >>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
> >>>
> >>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
> >>>
> >>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can get
> >>> from a dog
> >>>
> >>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
> >>>and again.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
> >>
> >>LOL!!!

> >
> >
> > He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
> > cartoon dog. :))

>
> You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried,
> childless, degreeless, scut-working marginal.


Still fishing. And still throwing
rage fits. Is that any way for
for a normal person to behave?
Er, I mean dog, woof woof.


--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button.




Rudy Canoza 19-07-2005 08:38 AM

Scented Nectar wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> k.net...
>
>>Scented Nectar wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Ron" > wrote in message
egroups.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>dh@. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
>>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
>>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
>>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
>>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
>>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
>>>>>
>>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
>>>>> can not experience
>>>>>
>>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>>>>>
>>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>>>>>
>>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>>>>>
>>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>>>>>
>>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
>>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
>>>>> from their elimination objective
>>>>>
>>>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
>>>>>
>>>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
>>>>> better lives for food animals.
>>>>>
>>>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
>>>>> than another.
>>>>>
>>>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
>>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
>>>>>
>>>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
>>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
>>>>>
>>>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
>>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
>>>>>
>>>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be experiencing
>>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger
>>>
>>>those
>>>
>>>
>>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
>>>>>
>>>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
>>>>>
>>>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can get
>>>>> from a dog
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
>>>>>and again.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
>>>>
>>>>LOL!!!
>>>
>>>
>>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
>>>cartoon dog. :))

>>
>>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried,
>>childless, degreeless, scut-working marginal.

>
>
> Still fishing.


Nope. I have all the facts.

Ron 19-07-2005 06:10 PM



Rudy Canoza wrote:
> Scented Nectar wrote:
> > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> > k.net...
> >
> >>Scented Nectar wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>"Ron" > wrote in message
> egroups.com...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>dh@. wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> >>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> >>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> >>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> >>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> >>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> >>>>> can not experience
> >>>>>
> >>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
> >>>>>
> >>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
> >>>>>
> >>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
> >>>>>
> >>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
> >>>>>
> >>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> >>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> >>>>> from their elimination objective
> >>>>>
> >>>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
> >>>>>
> >>>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> >>>>> better lives for food animals.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> >>>>> than another.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
> >>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> >>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
> >>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be experiencing
> >>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger
> >>>
> >>>those
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can get
> >>>>> from a dog
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
> >>>>>and again.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
> >>>>
> >>>>LOL!!!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
> >>>cartoon dog. :))
> >>
> >>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried,
> >>childless, degreeless, scut-working marginal.

> >
> >
> > Still fishing.

>
> Nope. I have all the facts.





Sure ya do Goo......whatever ya say.

LOL!!


Scented Nectar 19-07-2005 06:27 PM

"Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
nk.net...
> Scented Nectar wrote:
> > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> > k.net...
> >
> >>Scented Nectar wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>"Ron" > wrote in message
> egroups.com...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>dh@. wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> >>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> >>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> >>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> >>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> >>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> >>>>> can not experience
> >>>>>
> >>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
> >>>>>
> >>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
> >>>>>
> >>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
> >>>>>
> >>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
> >>>>>
> >>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> >>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> >>>>> from their elimination objective
> >>>>>
> >>>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
> >>>>>
> >>>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> >>>>> better lives for food animals.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> >>>>> than another.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
> >>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> >>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
> >>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be

experiencing
> >>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger
> >>>
> >>>those
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can

get
> >>>>> from a dog
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
> >>>>>and again.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
> >>>>
> >>>>LOL!!!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
> >>>cartoon dog. :))
> >>
> >>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried,
> >>childless, degreeless, scut-working marginal.

> >
> >
> > Still fishing.

>
> Nope. I have all the facts.


Still fishing. All you know is that
I'm 42 and female (those people
who are known to you as ****s).
Anyways Gooby, you want
walkies??? Too bad. Hope
you're not too dissappointed.


--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button.



[email protected] 19-07-2005 06:49 PM



Scented Nectar wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> nk.net...
> > Scented Nectar wrote:
> > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> > > k.net...
> > >
> > >>Scented Nectar wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>"Ron" > wrote in message
> > egroups.com...
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>dh@. wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> > >>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> > >>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> > >>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> > >>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> > >>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> > >>>>> can not experience
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> > >>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> > >>>>> from their elimination objective
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> > >>>>> better lives for food animals.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> > >>>>> than another.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
> > >>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> > >>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
> > >>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be

> experiencing
> > >>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger
> > >>>
> > >>>those
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can

> get
> > >>>>> from a dog
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
> > >>>>>and again.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
> > >>>>
> > >>>>LOL!!!
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
> > >>>cartoon dog. :))
> > >>
> > >>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried,
> > >>childless, degreeless, scut-working marginal.
> > >
> > >
> > > Still fishing.

> >
> > Nope. I have all the facts.

>
> Still fishing. All you know is that
> I'm 42 and female (those people
> who are known to you as ****s).
> Anyways Gooby, you want
> walkies??? Too bad. Hope
> you're not too dissappointed.



Don't bother asking. He'll just crap in his drawers as usual......he
loves to "anticipate" the warm, squishy, feeling.





>
>
> --
> SN
> http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
> A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
> Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button.



Scented Nectar 19-07-2005 07:03 PM

> wrote in message
ps.com...
>
>
> Scented Nectar wrote:
> > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> > nk.net...
> > > Scented Nectar wrote:
> > > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> > > > k.net...
> > > >
> > > >>Scented Nectar wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>"Ron" > wrote in message
> > > egroups.com...
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>dh@. wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> > > >>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> > > >>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> > > >>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> > > >>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> > > >>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> > > >>>>> can not experience
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> > > >>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> > > >>>>> from their elimination objective
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> > > >>>>> better lives for food animals.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> > > >>>>> than another.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans

and
> > > >>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> > > >>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
> > > >>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be

> > experiencing
> > > >>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily

trigger
> > > >>>
> > > >>>those
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you

can
> > get
> > > >>>>> from a dog
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
> > > >>>>>and again.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>LOL!!!
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
> > > >>>cartoon dog. :))
> > > >>
> > > >>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried,
> > > >>childless, degreeless, scut-working marginal.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Still fishing.
> > >
> > > Nope. I have all the facts.

> >
> > Still fishing. All you know is that
> > I'm 42 and female (those people
> > who are known to you as ****s).
> > Anyways Gooby, you want
> > walkies??? Too bad. Hope
> > you're not too dissappointed.

>
>
> Don't bother asking. He'll just crap in his drawers as usual......he
> loves to "anticipate" the warm, squishy, feeling.


Here's a good website for him:
http://www.doodie.com/. Heheh
(one must X out the spyware
attempts and ads though).

>
>
> >
> >
> > --
> > SN
> > http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
> > A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
> > Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button.

>





[email protected] 19-07-2005 07:10 PM



Scented Nectar wrote:
> > wrote in message
> ps.com...
> >
> >
> > Scented Nectar wrote:
> > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> > > nk.net...
> > > > Scented Nectar wrote:
> > > > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> > > > > k.net...
> > > > >
> > > > >>Scented Nectar wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>"Ron" > wrote in message
> > > > egroups.com...
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>dh@. wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> > > > >>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> > > > >>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> > > > >>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> > > > >>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> > > > >>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> > > > >>>>> can not experience
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> > > > >>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> > > > >>>>> from their elimination objective
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> > > > >>>>> better lives for food animals.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> > > > >>>>> than another.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans

> and
> > > > >>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> > > > >>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
> > > > >>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be
> > > experiencing
> > > > >>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily

> trigger
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>those
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you

> can
> > > get
> > > > >>>>> from a dog
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
> > > > >>>>>and again.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>LOL!!!
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
> > > > >>>cartoon dog. :))
> > > > >>
> > > > >>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried,
> > > > >>childless, degreeless, scut-working marginal.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Still fishing.
> > > >
> > > > Nope. I have all the facts.
> > >
> > > Still fishing. All you know is that
> > > I'm 42 and female (those people
> > > who are known to you as ****s).
> > > Anyways Gooby, you want
> > > walkies??? Too bad. Hope
> > > you're not too dissappointed.

> >
> >
> > Don't bother asking. He'll just crap in his drawers as usual......he
> > loves to "anticipate" the warm, squishy, feeling.

>
> Here's a good website for him:
> http://www.doodie.com/. Heheh
> (one must X out the spyware
> attempts and ads though).




Hehehehheheh;o)





>
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > SN
> > > http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
> > > A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
> > > Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button.

> >



Rudy Canoza 19-07-2005 07:20 PM

Scented Nectar wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> nk.net...
>
>>Scented Nectar wrote:
>>
>>>"Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
link.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Scented Nectar wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Ron" > wrote in message
glegroups.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
>>>>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
>>>>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
>>>>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
>>>>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
>>>>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
>>>>>>> can not experience
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
>>>>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
>>>>>>> from their elimination objective
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
>>>>>>> better lives for food animals.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
>>>>>>> than another.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
>>>>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
>>>>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
>>>>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be

>
> experiencing
>
>>>>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger
>>>>>
>>>>>those
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can

>
> get
>
>>>>>>> from a dog
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
>>>>>>>and again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>LOL!!!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
>>>>>cartoon dog. :))
>>>>
>>>>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried,
>>>>childless, degreeless, scut-working marginal.
>>>
>>>
>>>Still fishing.

>>
>>Nope. I have all the facts.

>
>
> Still fishing.


No fishing - established facts.

Gerbil-jonnie 19-07-2005 07:28 PM



Rudy Canoza wrote:
> Scented Nectar wrote:
> > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> > nk.net...
> >
> >>Scented Nectar wrote:
> >>
> >>>"Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> link.net...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Scented Nectar wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>"Ron" > wrote in message
> glegroups.com...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>dh@. wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> >>>>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> >>>>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> >>>>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> >>>>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> >>>>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> >>>>>>> can not experience
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> >>>>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> >>>>>>> from their elimination objective
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> >>>>>>> better lives for food animals.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> >>>>>>> than another.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
> >>>>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> >>>>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
> >>>>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be

> >
> > experiencing
> >
> >>>>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger
> >>>>>
> >>>>>those
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can

> >
> > get
> >
> >>>>>>> from a dog
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
> >>>>>>>and again.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>LOL!!!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
> >>>>>cartoon dog. :))
> >>>>
> >>>>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried,
> >>>>childless, degreeless, scut-working marginal.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Still fishing.
> >>
> >>Nope. I have all the facts.

> >
> >
> > Still fishing.

>
> No fishing - established facts.




well, spit 'em out then Goobernicus.....but please take the time to
enjoy the warm, squishy feeling before you reply.


usual suspect 20-07-2005 11:34 PM

Rudy Canoza wrote:
> Scented Nectar wrote:
>
>> "Ron" > wrote in message
>> oups.com...
>>
>>>
>>> dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>> Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
>>>> and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
>>>> himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
>>>> declining to answer questions and perform things which he
>>>> has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
>>>> afraid to even attempt include:
>>>>
>>>> 1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
>>>> can not experience
>>>>
>>>> 2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>>>>
>>>> 3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>>>>
>>>> 4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>>>>
>>>> 5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>>>>
>>>> 6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
>>>> from their elimination objective
>>>>
>>>> 7. describe any emotion(s) through language
>>>>
>>>> 8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
>>>> better lives for food animals.
>>>>
>>>> 9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
>>>> than another.
>>>>
>>>> 10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
>>>>
>>>> 11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
>>>>
>>>> 12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
>>>>
>>>> 13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be experiencing
>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger

>>
>>
>> those
>>
>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
>>>>
>>>> 14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
>>>>
>>>> 15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can get
>>>> from a dog
>>>>
>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
>>>> and again.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
>>>
>>> LOL!!!

>>
>>
>>
>> He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
>> cartoon dog. :))

>
>
> You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried, childless,
> degreeless, scut-working marginal.


....who takes the bus because she has no car.

Scented Nectar 20-07-2005 11:44 PM

"usual suspect" > wrote in message
...
> Rudy Canoza wrote:
> > Scented Nectar wrote:
> >
> >> "Ron" > wrote in message
> >> oups.com...
> >>
> >>>
> >>> dh@. wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> >>>> and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> >>>> himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> >>>> declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> >>>> has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> >>>> afraid to even attempt include:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> >>>> can not experience
> >>>>
> >>>> 2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
> >>>>
> >>>> 3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
> >>>>
> >>>> 4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
> >>>>
> >>>> 5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
> >>>>
> >>>> 6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> >>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> >>>> from their elimination objective
> >>>>
> >>>> 7. describe any emotion(s) through language
> >>>>
> >>>> 8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> >>>> better lives for food animals.
> >>>>
> >>>> 9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> >>>> than another.
> >>>>
> >>>> 10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
> >>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
> >>>>
> >>>> 11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> >>>> disappointment, if there are any.
> >>>>
> >>>> 12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
> >>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
> >>>>
> >>>> 13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be

experiencing
> >>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger
> >>
> >>
> >> those
> >>
> >>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
> >>>>
> >>>> 14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
> >>>>
> >>>> 15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can

get
> >>>> from a dog
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
> >>>> and again.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
> >>>
> >>> LOL!!!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
> >> cartoon dog. :))

> >
> >
> > You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried, childless,
> > degreeless, scut-working marginal.

>
> ...who takes the bus because she has no car.


Your need to fish is pathetic.


--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button.



usual suspect 21-07-2005 12:33 AM

Scented Nectar wrote:
> "usual suspect" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>
>>>Scented Nectar wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Ron" > wrote in message
legroups.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>dh@. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
>>>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
>>>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
>>>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
>>>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
>>>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
>>>>>> can not experience
>>>>>>
>>>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>>>>>>
>>>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>>>>>>
>>>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>>>>>>
>>>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
>>>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
>>>>>> from their elimination objective
>>>>>>
>>>>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
>>>>>>
>>>>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
>>>>>> better lives for food animals.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
>>>>>> than another.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
>>>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
>>>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
>>>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be

>
> experiencing
>
>>>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>those
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can

>
> get
>
>>>>>> from a dog
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
>>>>>>and again.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
>>>>>
>>>>>LOL!!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
>>>>cartoon dog. :))
>>>
>>>
>>>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried, childless,
>>>degreeless, scut-working marginal.

>>
>>...who takes the bus because she has no car.

>
>
> Your need to fish is pathetic.


Not fishing. You've already admitted you take the bus. Your sanctimony,
with all your tap-dancing between "killing animals is wrong" and "I
can't be bothered to practice what I preach," is much more pathetic than
anything which you can ever accuse anyone else.

Scented Nectar 21-07-2005 12:53 AM

"usual suspect" > wrote in message
...
> Scented Nectar wrote:
> > "usual suspect" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >>Rudy Canoza wrote:
> >>
> >>>Scented Nectar wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>"Ron" > wrote in message
> legroups.com...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>dh@. wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> >>>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> >>>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> >>>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> >>>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> >>>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> >>>>>> can not experience
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> >>>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> >>>>>> from their elimination objective
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> >>>>>> better lives for food animals.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> >>>>>> than another.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
> >>>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> >>>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
> >>>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be

> >
> > experiencing
> >
> >>>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>those
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can

> >
> > get
> >
> >>>>>> from a dog
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
> >>>>>>and again.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
> >>>>>
> >>>>>LOL!!!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
> >>>>cartoon dog. :))
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried, childless,
> >>>degreeless, scut-working marginal.
> >>
> >>...who takes the bus because she has no car.

> >
> >
> > Your need to fish is pathetic.

>
> Not fishing. You've already admitted you take the bus. Your sanctimony,
> with all your tap-dancing between "killing animals is wrong" and "I
> can't be bothered to practice what I preach," is much more pathetic than
> anything which you can ever accuse anyone else.


Wow, have you ever gotten things
****ed up there. In this group, I
have said I both take public transit
and at other times I drive. Whether
I own a car or have to rent or borrow
is something you just don't know.
Don't make statements when you
are in ignorance.

You used "quotes" in the above
making it sound like my words.
You know full well that I think
killing animals is *mostly* wrong.
You also know full well that I do
believe that I practice what I
preach. So what are you on
about?


--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button.




usual suspect 21-07-2005 01:32 AM

Scented Nectar wrote:
> "usual suspect" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Scented Nectar wrote:
>>
>>>"usual suspect" > wrote in message
. ..
>>>
>>>
>>>>Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Scented Nectar wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Ron" > wrote in message
oglegroups.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
>>>>>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
>>>>>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
>>>>>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
>>>>>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
>>>>>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
>>>>>>>> can not experience
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
>>>>>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
>>>>>>>> from their elimination objective
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
>>>>>>>> better lives for food animals.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
>>>>>>>> than another.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
>>>>>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
>>>>>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
>>>>>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be
>>>
>>>experiencing
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>those
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can
>>>
>>>get
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>> from a dog
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
>>>>>>>>and again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>LOL!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
>>>>>>cartoon dog. :))
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried, childless,
>>>>>degreeless, scut-working marginal.
>>>>
>>>>...who takes the bus because she has no car.
>>>
>>>
>>>Your need to fish is pathetic.

>>
>>Not fishing. You've already admitted you take the bus. Your sanctimony,
>>with all your tap-dancing between "killing animals is wrong" and "I
>>can't be bothered to practice what I preach," is much more pathetic than
>>anything which you can ever accuse anyone else.

>
>
> Wow,


That says it all.

> Whether I own a car or have to rent or borrow
> is something you just don't know.


I *do* know, Skanky. I know that you don't own one.

Ron 21-07-2005 06:02 PM



usual suspect wrote:
> Scented Nectar wrote:
> > "usual suspect" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >>Scented Nectar wrote:
> >>
> >>>"usual suspect" > wrote in message
> . ..
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Rudy Canoza wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Scented Nectar wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>"Ron" > wrote in message
> oglegroups.com...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>dh@. wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> >>>>>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> >>>>>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> >>>>>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> >>>>>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> >>>>>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> >>>>>>>> can not experience
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> >>>>>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> >>>>>>>> from their elimination objective
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> >>>>>>>> better lives for food animals.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> >>>>>>>> than another.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
> >>>>>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> >>>>>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
> >>>>>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be
> >>>
> >>>experiencing
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>those
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can
> >>>
> >>>get
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> from a dog
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
> >>>>>>>>and again.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>LOL!!!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
> >>>>>>cartoon dog. :))
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried, childless,
> >>>>>degreeless, scut-working marginal.
> >>>>
> >>>>...who takes the bus because she has no car.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Your need to fish is pathetic.
> >>
> >>Not fishing. You've already admitted you take the bus. Your sanctimony,
> >>with all your tap-dancing between "killing animals is wrong" and "I
> >>can't be bothered to practice what I preach," is much more pathetic than
> >>anything which you can ever accuse anyone else.

> >
> >
> > Wow,

>
> That says it all.
>
> > Whether I own a car or have to rent or borrow
> > is something you just don't know.

>
> I *do* know, Skanky. I know that you don't own one.



Tell us *everything* you know Useless.
We can all spare the 20 seconds.


Leslie 24-07-2005 07:56 PM

Found scrawled in the outhouse on Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:53:51 -0400, "Scented Nectar"
> wrote:

>"usual suspect" > wrote in message
.. .
>> Scented Nectar wrote:
>> > "usual suspect" > wrote in message
>> > ...

<snip gratuitous bullshit from the shark tank>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
>> >>>>cartoon dog. :))
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried, childless,
>> >>>degreeless, scut-working marginal.
>> >>
>> >>...who takes the bus because she has no car.
>> >
>> >
>> > Your need to fish is pathetic.

>>
>> Not fishing. You've already admitted you take the bus. Your sanctimony,
>> with all your tap-dancing between "killing animals is wrong" and "I
>> can't be bothered to practice what I preach," is much more pathetic than
>> anything which you can ever accuse anyone else.

>
>Wow, have you ever gotten things
>****ed up there. In this group, I
>have said I both take public transit
>and at other times I drive. Whether
>I own a car or have to rent or borrow
>is something you just don't know.
>Don't make statements when you
>are in ignorance.


SN, you just couldn't stay out of the ****ing contest, could you. Your mistake.
US hasn't gotten anything ****ed up in here. You do NOT have a car and you DO take the
bus. However, your biggest offense lies below:

>You used "quotes" in the above
>making it sound like my words.
>You know full well that I think
>killing animals is *mostly* wrong.
>You also know full well that I do
>believe that I practice what I
>preach. So what are you on
>about?


Killing animals is "mostly wrong". BWAHAHAHA....... Kind of like being "mostly pregnant"
or "mostly dead". What an imbecilic position to take, you hapless hypocrite. And, as soon
as I stop laughing, how about telling us how you can be "mostly pregnant, dead or wrong"!
As for practicing what you preach, well...you preach hypocrisy and qualifiers when backed
into a corner about how "mostly" wrong it is to kill animals. Evidently, it's "mostly"
right to destroy them and their habitats to produce your imported herbs and spices though.

Scented Nectar? No. Stinking Narcissist.? Yeah.

Jeers 2 U,

Leslie
"Only two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity.
And I'm not sure about the former.".... Albert Einstein

Scented Nectar 24-07-2005 09:29 PM

"Leslie" > wrote in message
...
> Found scrawled in the outhouse on Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:53:51 -0400,

"Scented Nectar"
> > wrote:
>
> >"usual suspect" > wrote in message
> .. .
> >> Scented Nectar wrote:
> >> > "usual suspect" > wrote in message
> >> > ...

> <snip gratuitous bullshit from the shark tank>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
> >> >>>>cartoon dog. :))
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried, childless,
> >> >>>degreeless, scut-working marginal.
> >> >>
> >> >>...who takes the bus because she has no car.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Your need to fish is pathetic.
> >>
> >> Not fishing. You've already admitted you take the bus. Your sanctimony,
> >> with all your tap-dancing between "killing animals is wrong" and "I
> >> can't be bothered to practice what I preach," is much more pathetic

than
> >> anything which you can ever accuse anyone else.

> >
> >Wow, have you ever gotten things
> >****ed up there. In this group, I
> >have said I both take public transit
> >and at other times I drive. Whether
> >I own a car or have to rent or borrow
> >is something you just don't know.
> >Don't make statements when you
> >are in ignorance.

>
> SN, you just couldn't stay out of the ****ing contest, could you. Your

mistake.
> US hasn't gotten anything ****ed up in here. You do NOT have a car and you

DO take the
> bus. However, your biggest offense lies below:


Now you're fishing too? You
didn't seem the type.

> >You used "quotes" in the above
> >making it sound like my words.
> >You know full well that I think
> >killing animals is *mostly* wrong.
> >You also know full well that I do
> >believe that I practice what I
> >preach. So what are you on
> >about?

>
> Killing animals is "mostly wrong". BWAHAHAHA....... Kind of like being

"mostly pregnant"
> or "mostly dead". What an imbecilic position to take, you hapless

hypocrite. And, as soon
> as I stop laughing, how about telling us how you can be "mostly pregnant,

dead or wrong"!

When you finish taking pleasure
in trying to insult, explain how
wrong is an absolute like death
or pregnancy. I'm curious what
*you* have to say about it (not the
others - we've been over it ad
nauseum). Of course, if you
can't discuss this without insulting,
I might not answer even if you do
explain your view.

> As for practicing what you preach, well...you preach hypocrisy and

qualifiers when backed
> into a corner about how "mostly" wrong it is to kill animals. Evidently,

it's "mostly"
> right to destroy them and their habitats to produce your imported herbs

and spices though.

The imported food causes no
more cds than the local.

> Scented Nectar? No. Stinking Narcissist.? Yeah.


What's your problem? Are
you just another insult thrower?
I think so.

> Jeers 2 U,


Buh bye, I might not answer your
future shit, until you can get that
anger under control.


--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/




Rudy Canoza 25-07-2005 07:07 PM

Scented Nectar wrote:
> "usual suspect" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Scented Nectar wrote:
> > > "usual suspect" > wrote in message
> > > ...
> > >
> > >>Rudy Canoza wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>Scented Nectar wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>"Ron" > wrote in message
> > legroups.com...
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>dh@. wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> > >>>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> > >>>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> > >>>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> > >>>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> > >>>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> > >>>>>> can not experience
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> > >>>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> > >>>>>> from their elimination objective
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> > >>>>>> better lives for food animals.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> > >>>>>> than another.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans and
> > >>>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> > >>>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior alternative
> > >>>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be
> > >
> > > experiencing
> > >
> > >>>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily trigger
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>those
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular emotions.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you can
> > >
> > > get
> > >
> > >>>>>> from a dog
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and again
> > >>>>>>and again.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>LOL!!!
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
> > >>>>cartoon dog. :))
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried, childless,
> > >>>degreeless, scut-working marginal.
> > >>
> > >>...who takes the bus because she has no car.
> > >
> > >
> > > Your need to fish is pathetic.

> >
> > Not fishing. You've already admitted you take the bus. Your sanctimony,
> > with all your tap-dancing between "killing animals is wrong" and "I
> > can't be bothered to practice what I preach," is much more pathetic than
> > anything which you can ever accuse anyone else.

>
> Wow, have you ever gotten things
> ****ed up there.


He didn't get anything ****ed up.

>
> You used "quotes" in the above
> making it sound like my words.
> You know full well that I think
> killing animals is *mostly* wrong.


No. You can't. You can't leap 20 feet into the air, you can't lift
100 kg of weight over your head, and you can't think it's "mostly"
wrong to kill animals. It is impossible. If you insist you to think
it, then you are admitting to mental illness.


> You also know full well that I do
> believe that I practice what I
> preach.


It doesn't matter if you "believe" that you practice what you preach.
Your beliefs are irrelvant. It is objectively true that you do *not*
practice what you preach. We also note that you claim to believe it is
"mostly" wrong to kill animals, and that belief is impossible for a
rational and thinking person to hold. Your statements of what you
believe you think and do are wholly immaterial.


Scented Nectar 26-07-2005 04:53 AM

"Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> Scented Nectar wrote:
> > "usual suspect" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > > Scented Nectar wrote:
> > > > "usual suspect" > wrote in message
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > >>Rudy Canoza wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>>Scented Nectar wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>"Ron" > wrote in message
> > > legroups.com...
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>dh@. wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> > > >>>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> > > >>>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> > > >>>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> > > >>>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> > > >>>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> > > >>>>>> can not experience
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> > > >>>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> > > >>>>>> from their elimination objective
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> > > >>>>>> better lives for food animals.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> > > >>>>>> than another.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans

and
> > > >>>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> > > >>>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior

alternative
> > > >>>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be
> > > >
> > > > experiencing
> > > >
> > > >>>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily

trigger
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>those
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular

emotions.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you

can
> > > >
> > > > get
> > > >
> > > >>>>>> from a dog
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and

again
> > > >>>>>>and again.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>LOL!!!
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
> > > >>>>cartoon dog. :))
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried, childless,
> > > >>>degreeless, scut-working marginal.
> > > >>
> > > >>...who takes the bus because she has no car.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your need to fish is pathetic.
> > >
> > > Not fishing. You've already admitted you take the bus. Your

sanctimony,
> > > with all your tap-dancing between "killing animals is wrong" and "I
> > > can't be bothered to practice what I preach," is much more pathetic

than
> > > anything which you can ever accuse anyone else.

> >
> > Wow, have you ever gotten things
> > ****ed up there.

>
> He didn't get anything ****ed up.


Yes he did.

> > You used "quotes" in the above
> > making it sound like my words.
> > You know full well that I think
> > killing animals is *mostly* wrong.

>
> No. You can't. You can't leap 20 feet into the air, you can't lift
> 100 kg of weight over your head, and you can't think it's "mostly"
> wrong to kill animals. It is impossible. If you insist you to think
> it, then you are admitting to mental illness.


I CAN believe it's mostly wrong
to kill animals, and no, that's not
a mental disorder. Your
obsessive-compulsive needs
to make things into absolutes
though are mental. Also, your
paranoid seeing of 'implied'
things all over the place might
be suspect as well.

> > You also know full well that I do
> > believe that I practice what I
> > preach.

>
> It doesn't matter if you "believe" that you practice what you preach.
> Your beliefs are irrelvant. It is objectively true that you do *not*
> practice what you preach. We also note that you claim to believe it is
> "mostly" wrong to kill animals, and that belief is impossible for a
> rational and thinking person to hold. Your statements of what you
> believe you think and do are wholly immaterial.


My beliefs are very relevant as
to whether I think I'm living up
to them. When you say "We
also...", who else are you
referring to, specifically?


--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/




Rudy Canoza 26-07-2005 05:47 AM

Scented Nectar wrote:

> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
>
>>Scented Nectar wrote:
>>
>>>"usual suspect" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>>>Scented Nectar wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"usual suspect" > wrote in message
. ..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Scented Nectar wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Ron" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:1121710299.089384.313110@g14g2000cwa. googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
>>>>>>>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
>>>>>>>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
>>>>>>>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
>>>>>>>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
>>>>>>>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
>>>>>>>>>> can not experience
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
>>>>>>>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
>>>>>>>>>> from their elimination objective
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
>>>>>>>>>> better lives for food animals.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
>>>>>>>>>> than another.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans

>
> and
>
>>>>>>>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
>>>>>>>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior

>
> alternative
>
>>>>>>>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be
>>>>>
>>>>>experiencing
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily

>
> trigger
>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>those
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular

>
> emotions.
>
>>>>>>>>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you

>
> can
>
>>>>>get
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> from a dog
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and

>
> again
>
>>>>>>>>>>and again.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>LOL!!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
>>>>>>>>cartoon dog. :))
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried, childless,
>>>>>>>degreeless, scut-working marginal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>...who takes the bus because she has no car.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Your need to fish is pathetic.
>>>>
>>>>Not fishing. You've already admitted you take the bus. Your

>
> sanctimony,
>
>>>>with all your tap-dancing between "killing animals is wrong" and "I
>>>>can't be bothered to practice what I preach," is much more pathetic

>
> than
>
>>>>anything which you can ever accuse anyone else.
>>>
>>>Wow, have you ever gotten things
>>>****ed up there.

>>
>>He didn't get anything ****ed up.

>
>
> Yes he did.


He didn't get anything ****ed up.


>>>You used "quotes" in the above
>>>making it sound like my words.
>>>You know full well that I think
>>>killing animals is *mostly* wrong.

>>
>>No. You can't. You can't leap 20 feet into the air, you can't lift
>>100 kg of weight over your head, and you can't think it's "mostly"
>>wrong to kill animals. It is impossible. If you insist you to think
>>it, then you are admitting to mental illness.

>
>
> I CAN believe it's mostly wrong
> to kill animals,


You cannot.


> and no, that's not
> a mental disorder.


Yes, it is.


> You obsessive-compulsive needs


None.


> to make things into absolutes
> though are mental.


It's not I making anything absolute. Some things just
are. Adults accept it. Retarded juveniles like you
think they don't need to accept it. You're wrong.

By definition, it cannot be "mostly" wrong to kill
animals. It can be wrong in some cases and not in
others, e.g. if self defense comes into it, but in any
*given* case, either it's wrong or it isn't. It is
logically impossible for your "mostly". That's just
how it is.


>>>You also know full well that I do
>>>believe that I practice what I
>>>preach.

>>
>>It doesn't matter if you "believe" that you practice what you preach.
>>Your beliefs are irrelvant. It is objectively true that you do *not*
>>practice what you preach. We also note that you claim to believe it is
>>"mostly" wrong to kill animals, and that belief is impossible for a
>>rational and thinking person to hold. Your statements of what you
>>believe you think and do are wholly immaterial.

>
>
> My beliefs are very relevant


Your beliefs are wholly irrelevant. It is objectively
true that you do *not* practice what you preach, and no
part of your beliefs can change that fact.

Dutch 26-07-2005 08:48 AM

"Scented Nectar" > wrote

> I CAN believe it's mostly wrong
> to kill animals, and no, that's not
> a mental disorder.


No, it's just meaningless and idiotic.

> Your
> obsessive-compulsive needs
> to make things into absolutes
> though are mental.


YOUR belief that eating meat
is immoral is the absurd obsessive
absolute.





Rudy Canoza 26-07-2005 03:33 PM

Dutch wrote:
> "Scented Nectar" > wrote
>
>
>>I CAN believe it's mostly wrong
>>to kill animals, and no, that's not
>>a mental disorder.

>
>
> No, it's just meaningless and idiotic.


The initial statement that she thinks it's "mostly"
wrong is meaningless and idiotic. Her continued
insistence that she can think it after having been
shown the impossibility of it is a mental disorder.


>
>
>>Your obsessive-compulsive needs
>>to make things into absolutes
>>though are mental.

>
>
> YOUR belief that eating meat
> is immoral is the absurd obsessive
> absolute.


All "veganism" is an absurd obsessive absolute.

Scented Nectar 26-07-2005 05:39 PM

"Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
nk.net...
> Scented Nectar wrote:
>
> > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> > oups.com...
> >
> >>Scented Nectar wrote:
> >>
> >>>"usual suspect" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>>
> >>>>Scented Nectar wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>"usual suspect" > wrote in message
> . ..
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Rudy Canoza wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Scented Nectar wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>"Ron" > wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>news:1121710299.089384.313110@g14g2000cwa. googlegroups.com...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>dh@. wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> >>>>>>>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> >>>>>>>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> >>>>>>>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> >>>>>>>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> >>>>>>>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> >>>>>>>>>> can not experience
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> >>>>>>>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> >>>>>>>>>> from their elimination objective
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> >>>>>>>>>> better lives for food animals.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> >>>>>>>>>> than another.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans

> >
> > and
> >
> >>>>>>>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> >>>>>>>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior

> >
> > alternative
> >
> >>>>>>>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be
> >>>>>
> >>>>>experiencing
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily

> >
> > trigger
> >
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>those
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular

> >
> > emotions.
> >
> >>>>>>>>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you

> >
> > can
> >
> >>>>>get
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> from a dog
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and

> >
> > again
> >
> >>>>>>>>>>and again.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>LOL!!!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
> >>>>>>>>cartoon dog. :))
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried, childless,
> >>>>>>>degreeless, scut-working marginal.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>...who takes the bus because she has no car.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Your need to fish is pathetic.
> >>>>
> >>>>Not fishing. You've already admitted you take the bus. Your

> >
> > sanctimony,
> >
> >>>>with all your tap-dancing between "killing animals is wrong" and "I
> >>>>can't be bothered to practice what I preach," is much more pathetic

> >
> > than
> >
> >>>>anything which you can ever accuse anyone else.
> >>>
> >>>Wow, have you ever gotten things
> >>>****ed up there.
> >>
> >>He didn't get anything ****ed up.

> >
> >
> > Yes he did.

>
> He didn't get anything ****ed up.


Yes he did, and now you are
****ed up.

> >>>You used "quotes" in the above
> >>>making it sound like my words.
> >>>You know full well that I think
> >>>killing animals is *mostly* wrong.
> >>
> >>No. You can't. You can't leap 20 feet into the air, you can't lift
> >>100 kg of weight over your head, and you can't think it's "mostly"
> >>wrong to kill animals. It is impossible. If you insist you to think
> >>it, then you are admitting to mental illness.

> >
> >
> > I CAN believe it's mostly wrong
> > to kill animals,

>
> You cannot.


But I do anyways, so I guess I
can.

> > and no, that's not
> > a mental disorder.

>
> Yes, it is.


What one?

> > You obsessive-compulsive needs

>
> None.


You are very OCD.

> > to make things into absolutes
> > though are mental.

>
> It's not I making anything absolute. Some things just
> are. Adults accept it. Retarded juveniles like you
> think they don't need to accept it. You're wrong.
>
> By definition, it cannot be "mostly" wrong to kill
> animals. It can be wrong in some cases and not in
> others, e.g. if self defense comes into it, but in any
> *given* case, either it's wrong or it isn't. It is
> logically impossible for your "mostly". That's just
> how it is.


For you in your restricted brain
space, maybe, but for me it's
a different story.

> >>>You also know full well that I do
> >>>believe that I practice what I
> >>>preach.
> >>
> >>It doesn't matter if you "believe" that you practice what you preach.
> >>Your beliefs are irrelvant. It is objectively true that you do *not*
> >>practice what you preach. We also note that you claim to believe it is
> >>"mostly" wrong to kill animals, and that belief is impossible for a
> >>rational and thinking person to hold. Your statements of what you
> >>believe you think and do are wholly immaterial.

> >
> >
> > My beliefs are very relevant

>
> Your beliefs are wholly irrelevant. It is objectively
> true that you do *not* practice what you preach, and no
> part of your beliefs can change that fact.


Helloooooo. My beliefs ARE
what I practice, so they are very
relevant.


--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/



Rudy Canoza 26-07-2005 05:54 PM

Scented Nectar wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> nk.net...
> > Scented Nectar wrote:
> >
> > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> > > oups.com...
> > >
> > >>Scented Nectar wrote:


> > >>>Wow, have you ever gotten things
> > >>>****ed up there.
> > >>
> > >>He didn't get anything ****ed up.
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes he did.

> >
> > He didn't get anything ****ed up.

>
> Yes he did, and now you are
> ****ed up.


Neither he nor I has got anything ****ed up. You have.


> > >>>You used "quotes" in the above
> > >>>making it sound like my words.
> > >>>You know full well that I think
> > >>>killing animals is *mostly* wrong.
> > >>
> > >>No. You can't. You can't leap 20 feet into the air, you can't lift
> > >>100 kg of weight over your head, and you can't think it's "mostly"
> > >>wrong to kill animals. It is impossible. If you insist you to think
> > >>it, then you are admitting to mental illness.
> > >
> > >
> > > I CAN believe it's mostly wrong
> > > to kill animals,

> >
> > You cannot.

>
> But I do anyways, so I guess I
> can.


No, you don't. You like to lie to yourself and say you do, but you
don't really. THAT is the mental illness.


> > > and no, that's not
> > > a mental disorder.

> >
> > Yes, it is.

>
> What one?


Delusion.


> > > You obsessive-compulsive needs

> >
> > None.

>
> You are very OCD.


No, I am not. You have zero qualification to find any form of mental
disorder in others. You're too crippled by your own.


>
> > > to make things into absolutes
> > > though are mental.

> >
> > It's not I making anything absolute. Some things just
> > are. Adults accept it. Retarded juveniles like you
> > think they don't need to accept it. You're wrong.
> >
> > By definition, it cannot be "mostly" wrong to kill
> > animals. It can be wrong in some cases and not in
> > others, e.g. if self defense comes into it, but in any
> > *given* case, either it's wrong or it isn't. It is
> > logically impossible for your "mostly". That's just
> > how it is.

>
> For you in your restricted brain
> space, maybe, but for me it's
> a different story.


The difference in story is the story of your mental disorder. You
really are delusional. You *want* some things to be true, and based on
that alone you imagine them to be true. They aren't.


> > >>>You also know full well that I do
> > >>>believe that I practice what I
> > >>>preach.
> > >>
> > >>It doesn't matter if you "believe" that you practice what you preach.
> > >>Your beliefs are irrelvant. It is objectively true that you do *not*
> > >>practice what you preach. We also note that you claim to believe it is
> > >>"mostly" wrong to kill animals, and that belief is impossible for a
> > >>rational and thinking person to hold. Your statements of what you
> > >>believe you think and do are wholly immaterial.
> > >
> > >
> > > My beliefs are very relevant

> >
> > Your beliefs are wholly irrelevant. It is objectively
> > true that you do *not* practice what you preach, and no
> > part of your beliefs can change that fact.

>
> Helloooooo. My beliefs ARE
> what I practice, so they are very
> relevant.


Your stated beliefs are *not* what you practice. Your beliefs about
what you do are irrelevant. We can see for ourselves what you do, and
it is far at variance from what you say you do. You are a liar and
hypocrite; massively so.


Scented Nectar 26-07-2005 06:06 PM

Get a life Gooby.

--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/




Rudy Canoza 26-07-2005 07:01 PM

Scented Nectar wrote:
> Get a life


You are unoriginal, trite, stale.

You also are delusional: you cannot rationally believe that it is
"mostly" wrong to kill animals.


[email protected] 26-07-2005 07:41 PM



Rudy Canoza wrote:
> Scented Nectar wrote:
> > Get a life

>
> You are unoriginal, trite, stale.
>
> You also are delusional: you cannot rationally believe that it is
> "mostly" wrong to kill animals.



Why not go back to misc.rural Gooby? You were having a hell of a good
time there swearing and screaming about DST and cows.


Scented Nectar 26-07-2005 07:45 PM

"Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> Scented Nectar wrote:
> > Get a life

>
> You are unoriginal, trite, stale.
>
> You also are delusional: you cannot rationally believe that it is
> "mostly" wrong to kill animals.


I think I've explained it to you
dozens of times, in dozens of
ways. I give up. You wouldn't
understand no matter how
much I reword it, or how much
I dumb it down.


--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/



Dutch 26-07-2005 08:23 PM


"Scented Nectar" > wrote
> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote
>> Scented Nectar wrote:


>> > Get a life

>>
>> You are unoriginal, trite, stale.
>>
>> You also are delusional: you cannot rationally believe that it is
>> "mostly" wrong to kill animals.

>
> I think I've explained it to you
> dozens of times, in dozens of
> ways.


You have never explained what "mostly wrong"
means, and I doubt that you ever will, because
it's an absurdity that defies explanation. What
it reveals is deep moral confusion.



Rudy Canoza 26-07-2005 08:38 PM

Scented Nectar wrote:

> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> ups.com...
>
>>Scented Nectar wrote:
>>
>>>Get a life

>>
>>You are unoriginal, trite, stale.
>>
>>You also are delusional: you cannot rationally believe that it is
>>"mostly" wrong to kill animals.

>
>
> I think I've explained it to you
> dozens of times, in dozens of
> ways.


It was, and is, bullshit. You keep trying to make
sense out of nonsense, and it won't work.

You *cannot* think it "mostly" wrong to kill animals.
It's impossible. If you believe you think it, then you
are mentally ill.

Rudy Canoza 26-07-2005 09:12 PM

Dutch wrote:

> "Scented Nectar" > wrote
>
>>"Rudy Canoza" > wrote
>>
>>>Scented Nectar wrote:

>
>
>>>>Get a life
>>>
>>>You are unoriginal, trite, stale.
>>>
>>>You also are delusional: you cannot rationally believe that it is
>>>"mostly" wrong to kill animals.

>>
>>I think I've explained it to you
>>dozens of times, in dozens of
>>ways.

>
>
> You have never explained what "mostly wrong"
> means,


Exactly right.


> and I doubt that you ever will, because
> it's an absurdity that defies explanation. What
> it reveals is deep moral confusion.


It's her weaselly language.

Here's what it means in effect: it's wrong when people
Skanky doesn't like do it, and it's acceptable when she
does it.

Ron 27-07-2005 10:04 PM



Scented Nectar wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> ups.com...
> > Scented Nectar wrote:
> > > Get a life

> >
> > You are unoriginal, trite, stale.
> >
> > You also are delusional: you cannot rationally believe that it is
> > "mostly" wrong to kill animals.

>
> I think I've explained it to you
> dozens of times, in dozens of
> ways. I give up. You wouldn't
> understand no matter how
> much I reword it, or how much
> I dumb it down.
>





I don't believe it's possible to dumb something down enough that the
littlest goober would be able to understand it.

To dumb it down that far would leave nothing.....but maybe that's the
only way the goober would understand.

Kind of a Catch-22....goober style.






>
> --
> SN
> http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/



Dutch 28-07-2005 01:04 AM


"Ron" > wrote > Scented Nectar wrote:
>> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote
>> > Scented Nectar wrote:


>> > You also are delusional: you cannot rationally believe that it is
>> > "mostly" wrong to kill animals.

>>
>> I think I've explained it to you
>> dozens of times, in dozens of
>> ways. I give up. You wouldn't
>> understand no matter how
>> much I reword it, or how much
>> I dumb it down.


> I don't believe it's possible to dumb something down enough that the
> littlest goober would be able to understand it.


She is lying, she hasn't tried to re-word it, and it would be impossible to
dumb it down, it's already the dumbest statement in the history of this
newsgroup. I suggest you try to smarten it up. I've done so, to no avail. I
suggested to her that she meant to say that 'it's *usually* wrong to kill
animals', but apparently that's not it.

> To dumb it down that far would leave nothing.....but maybe that's the
> only way the goober would understand.


The statement is meaningless jibberish as far as I can tell.

> Kind of a Catch-22....goober style.


Let's hear your explanation of "it's mostly wrong to kill animals" Mr
Smartypants.



[email protected] 28-07-2005 03:10 AM



Rudy Canoza wrote:
> Dutch wrote:
> > "Scented Nectar" > wrote
> >
> >
> >>I CAN believe it's mostly wrong
> >>to kill animals, and no, that's not
> >>a mental disorder.

> >
> >
> > No, it's just meaningless and idiotic.

>
> The initial statement that she thinks it's "mostly"
> wrong is meaningless and idiotic. Her continued
> insistence that she can think it after having been
> shown the impossibility of it is a mental disorder.
>
>
> >
> >
> >>Your obsessive-compulsive needs
> >>to make things into absolutes
> >>though are mental.

> >
> >
> > YOUR belief that eating meat
> > is immoral is the absurd obsessive
> > absolute.

>
> All "veganism" is an absurd obsessive absolute.



now who's talking gibberish?


Stupid little goobernicus gonad.


Scented Nectar 28-07-2005 06:12 AM

"Ron" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
>
> Scented Nectar wrote:
> > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> > ups.com...
> > > Scented Nectar wrote:
> > > > Get a life
> > >
> > > You are unoriginal, trite, stale.
> > >
> > > You also are delusional: you cannot rationally believe that it is
> > > "mostly" wrong to kill animals.

> >
> > I think I've explained it to you
> > dozens of times, in dozens of
> > ways. I give up. You wouldn't
> > understand no matter how
> > much I reword it, or how much
> > I dumb it down.
> >

>
>
>
>
> I don't believe it's possible to dumb something down enough that the
> littlest goober would be able to understand it.
>
> To dumb it down that far would leave nothing.....but maybe that's the
> only way the goober would understand.
>
> Kind of a Catch-22....goober style.


I wonder if Gooby can count to
22. That's more than most
people's fingers and toes put
together. :)



--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/



usual suspect 28-07-2005 02:53 PM

Scented Nectar wrote:
<...>
>>>Wow, have you ever gotten things
>>>****ed up there.

>>
>>He didn't get anything ****ed up.

>
> Yes he did.


No, I didn't, bus-rider.

>>>You used "quotes" in the above
>>>making it sound like my words.
>>>You know full well that I think
>>>killing animals is *mostly* wrong.

>>
>>No. You can't. You can't leap 20 feet into the air, you can't lift
>>100 kg of weight over your head, and you can't think it's "mostly"
>>wrong to kill animals. It is impossible. If you insist you to think
>>it, then you are admitting to mental illness.

>
> I CAN


No, you cannot.

>>>You also know full well that I do
>>>believe that I practice what I
>>>preach.

>>
>>It doesn't matter if you "believe" that you practice what you preach.
>>Your beliefs are irrelvant. It is objectively true that you do *not*
>>practice what you preach. We also note that you claim to believe it is
>>"mostly" wrong to kill animals, and that belief is impossible for a
>>rational and thinking person to hold. Your statements of what you
>>believe you think and do are wholly immaterial.

>
> My beliefs are


a putrid pile of steaming bullshit.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter