In article >, "Dutch" >
wrote:

> "Ron" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article >, "Dutch" >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> "Ron" > wrote nothing
> >>
> >> Nothing you say warrants a response, you're a troll.
> >
> > Failing to respond to the inconsistencies of your position
>
> There are none.
>
> , while it may
> > be commonly held, makes you look bad. A choice, Dutch.
>
> Your whole position makes you look like a troll Ronny,
>
> > As much as I would enjoy another entertaining round of "he made me do
> > it", I think this approach might be best.
>
> You don't think.

the only evidence that I can find to support your position is one entry
in the criminal code that you continually refer back to. I have given
multiple examples to illustrate how this feature of the law with respect
to this ONE act is similar to the thinking of children and pervasive in
our culture. Troll, indeed.

I have previously demonstrated that this position is inconsistent within
the criminal code as well.

Where did you learn that I was responsible for the actions and outcomes
of others. It certainly wasn't taught in any classroom or university
that I attended.

"Ron" > wrote
> "Dutch" > wrote:

>> > As much as I would enjoy another entertaining round of "he made me do
>> > it", I think this approach might be best.
>>
>> You don't think.
>
> the only evidence that I can find to support your position is one entry
> in the criminal code that you continually refer back to. I have given
> multiple examples to illustrate how this feature of the law with respect
> to this ONE act is similar to the thinking of children and pervasive in
> our culture. Troll, indeed.

You have been utterly incoherent.

> I have previously demonstrated that this position is inconsistent within
> the criminal code as well.

Nope.

>
> Where did you learn that I was responsible for the actions and outcomes
> of others. It certainly wasn't taught in any classroom or university
> that I attended.

Attended but were tossed out unceremoniously for inability to think.

In article >, "Dutch" >
wrote:

> "Ron" > wrote
> > "Dutch" > wrote:
>
> >> > As much as I would enjoy another entertaining round of "he made me do
> >> > it", I think this approach might be best.
> >>
> >> You don't think.
> >
> > the only evidence that I can find to support your position is one entry
> > in the criminal code that you continually refer back to. I have given
> > multiple examples to illustrate how this feature of the law with respect
> > to this ONE act is similar to the thinking of children and pervasive in
> > our culture. Troll, indeed.
>
> You have been utterly incoherent.
>
> > I have previously demonstrated that this position is inconsistent within
> > the criminal code as well.
>
> Nope.
>
> >
> > Where did you learn that I was responsible for the actions and outcomes
> > of others. It certainly wasn't taught in any classroom or university
> > that I attended.
>
> Attended but were tossed out unceremoniously for inability to think.

I'm curious. Please do tell. Where did you learn this? Was it in school?
An ethics class? From a favourite professor or loved one? Who taught you
that you are responsible for the outcomes of other people's actions. I
would suggest that our knowledge of the law regarding a hitman doesn't
come until much later in life, likely our teens. I'm guessing then, that
this is a lesson most often learned in the home where faulty logic is
passed from one generation to the next.

So, who taught you that you or I are responsible for the outcome of
other people's actions.

"Ron" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, "Dutch" >
> wrote:
>
>> "Ron" > wrote
>> > "Dutch" > wrote:
>>
>> >> > As much as I would enjoy another entertaining round of "he made me
>> >> > do
>> >> > it", I think this approach might be best.
>> >>
>> >> You don't think.
>> >
>> > the only evidence that I can find to support your position is one entry
>> > in the criminal code that you continually refer back to. I have given
>> > multiple examples to illustrate how this feature of the law with
>> > respect
>> > to this ONE act is similar to the thinking of children and pervasive in
>> > our culture. Troll, indeed.
>>
>> You have been utterly incoherent.
>>
>> > I have previously demonstrated that this position is inconsistent
>> > within
>> > the criminal code as well.
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>> >
>> > Where did you learn that I was responsible for the actions and outcomes
>> > of others. It certainly wasn't taught in any classroom or university
>> > that I attended.
>>
>> Attended but were tossed out unceremoniously for inability to think.
>
> I'm curious. Please do tell. Where did you learn this? Was it in school?
> An ethics class? From a favourite professor or loved one? Who taught you
> that you are responsible for the outcomes of other people's actions. I
> would suggest that our knowledge of the law regarding a hitman doesn't
> come until much later in life, likely our teens. I'm guessing then, that
> this is a lesson most often learned in the home where faulty logic is
> passed from one generation to the next.
>
> So, who taught you that you or I are responsible for the outcome of
> other people's actions.

You're responsible for YOUR OWN actions, i.e. hiring hitmen.

In article >, "Dutch" >
wrote:

> "Ron" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article >, "Dutch" >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> "Ron" > wrote
> >> > "Dutch" > wrote:
> >>
> >> >> > As much as I would enjoy another entertaining round of "he made me
> >> >> > do
> >> >> > it", I think this approach might be best.
> >> >>
> >> >> You don't think.
> >> >
> >> > the only evidence that I can find to support your position is one entry
> >> > in the criminal code that you continually refer back to. I have given
> >> > multiple examples to illustrate how this feature of the law with
> >> > respect
> >> > to this ONE act is similar to the thinking of children and pervasive in
> >> > our culture. Troll, indeed.
> >>
> >> You have been utterly incoherent.
> >>
> >> > I have previously demonstrated that this position is inconsistent
> >> > within
> >> > the criminal code as well.
> >>
> >> Nope.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Where did you learn that I was responsible for the actions and outcomes
> >> > of others. It certainly wasn't taught in any classroom or university
> >> > that I attended.
> >>
> >> Attended but were tossed out unceremoniously for inability to think.
> >
> > I'm curious. Please do tell. Where did you learn this? Was it in school?
> > An ethics class? From a favourite professor or loved one? Who taught you
> > that you are responsible for the outcomes of other people's actions. I
> > would suggest that our knowledge of the law regarding a hitman doesn't
> > come until much later in life, likely our teens. I'm guessing then, that
> > this is a lesson most often learned in the home where faulty logic is
> > passed from one generation to the next.
> >
> > So, who taught you that you or I are responsible for the outcome of
> > other people's actions.
>
> You're responsible for YOUR OWN actions, i.e. hiring hitmen.

Nice try, Dutch, or should I say pass the dutchie to the right hand side.

The question was who taught you that you or I was responsible for the
outcomes of other people's actions.

"Ron" > wrote

> The question was who taught you that you or I was responsible for the
> outcomes of other people's actions.

It's called complicity. In legal jargon it's "accessory".

In article >, "Dutch" >
wrote:

> "Ron" > wrote
>
> > The question was who taught you that you or I was responsible for the
> > outcomes of other people's actions.
>
> It's called complicity. In legal jargon it's "accessory".

And again, you avoided the question.

Who taught the pharoahs that they were responsible for the outcomes of
other people's actions? Who taught the indigenous populations of Africa
or Australia that they were responsible for the outcomes of other
people's actions?

"Ron" > wrote

> The question was who taught you that you or I was responsible for the
> outcomes of other people's actions.

It's called complicity. In legal jargon it's "accessory".

In article >, "Dutch" >
wrote:

> "Ron" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article >, "Dutch" >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> "Ron" > wrote
> >> > "Dutch" > wrote:
> >>
> >> >> > As much as I would enjoy another entertaining round of "he made me
> >> >> > do
> >> >> > it", I think this approach might be best.
> >> >>
> >> >> You don't think.
> >> >
> >> > the only evidence that I can find to support your position is one entry
> >> > in the criminal code that you continually refer back to. I have given
> >> > multiple examples to illustrate how this feature of the law with
> >> > respect
> >> > to this ONE act is similar to the thinking of children and pervasive in
> >> > our culture. Troll, indeed.
> >>
> >> You have been utterly incoherent.
> >>
> >> > I have previously demonstrated that this position is inconsistent
> >> > within
> >> > the criminal code as well.
> >>
> >> Nope.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Where did you learn that I was responsible for the actions and outcomes
> >> > of others. It certainly wasn't taught in any classroom or university
> >> > that I attended.
> >>
> >> Attended but were tossed out unceremoniously for inability to think.
> >
> > I'm curious. Please do tell. Where did you learn this? Was it in school?
> > An ethics class? From a favourite professor or loved one? Who taught you
> > that you are responsible for the outcomes of other people's actions. I
> > would suggest that our knowledge of the law regarding a hitman doesn't
> > come until much later in life, likely our teens. I'm guessing then, that
> > this is a lesson most often learned in the home where faulty logic is
> > passed from one generation to the next.
> >
> > So, who taught you that you or I are responsible for the outcome of
> > other people's actions.
>
> You're responsible for YOUR OWN actions, i.e. hiring hitmen.

Nice try, Dutch, or should I say pass the dutchie to the right hand side.

The question was who taught you that you or I was responsible for the
outcomes of other people's actions.

"Ron" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, "Dutch" >
> wrote:
>
>> "Ron" > wrote
>> > "Dutch" > wrote:
>>
>> >> > As much as I would enjoy another entertaining round of "he made me
>> >> > do
>> >> > it", I think this approach might be best.
>> >>
>> >> You don't think.
>> >
>> > the only evidence that I can find to support your position is one entry
>> > in the criminal code that you continually refer back to. I have given
>> > multiple examples to illustrate how this feature of the law with
>> > respect
>> > to this ONE act is similar to the thinking of children and pervasive in
>> > our culture. Troll, indeed.
>>
>> You have been utterly incoherent.
>>
>> > I have previously demonstrated that this position is inconsistent
>> > within
>> > the criminal code as well.
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>> >
>> > Where did you learn that I was responsible for the actions and outcomes
>> > of others. It certainly wasn't taught in any classroom or university
>> > that I attended.
>>
>> Attended but were tossed out unceremoniously for inability to think.
>
> I'm curious. Please do tell. Where did you learn this? Was it in school?
> An ethics class? From a favourite professor or loved one? Who taught you
> that you are responsible for the outcomes of other people's actions. I
> would suggest that our knowledge of the law regarding a hitman doesn't
> come until much later in life, likely our teens. I'm guessing then, that
> this is a lesson most often learned in the home where faulty logic is
> passed from one generation to the next.
>
> So, who taught you that you or I are responsible for the outcome of
> other people's actions.

You're responsible for YOUR OWN actions, i.e. hiring hitmen.

In article >, "Dutch" >
wrote:

> "Ron" > wrote
> > "Dutch" > wrote:
>
> >> > As much as I would enjoy another entertaining round of "he made me do
> >> > it", I think this approach might be best.
> >>
> >> You don't think.
> >
> > the only evidence that I can find to support your position is one entry
> > in the criminal code that you continually refer back to. I have given
> > multiple examples to illustrate how this feature of the law with respect
> > to this ONE act is similar to the thinking of children and pervasive in
> > our culture. Troll, indeed.
>
> You have been utterly incoherent.
>
> > I have previously demonstrated that this position is inconsistent within
> > the criminal code as well.
>
> Nope.
>
> >
> > Where did you learn that I was responsible for the actions and outcomes
> > of others. It certainly wasn't taught in any classroom or university
> > that I attended.
>
> Attended but were tossed out unceremoniously for inability to think.

I'm curious. Please do tell. Where did you learn this? Was it in school?
An ethics class? From a favourite professor or loved one? Who taught you
that you are responsible for the outcomes of other people's actions. I
would suggest that our knowledge of the law regarding a hitman doesn't
come until much later in life, likely our teens. I'm guessing then, that
this is a lesson most often learned in the home where faulty logic is
passed from one generation to the next.

So, who taught you that you or I are responsible for the outcome of
other people's actions.

"Ron" > wrote
> "Dutch" > wrote:

>> > As much as I would enjoy another entertaining round of "he made me do
>> > it", I think this approach might be best.
>>
>> You don't think.
>
> the only evidence that I can find to support your position is one entry
> in the criminal code that you continually refer back to. I have given
> multiple examples to illustrate how this feature of the law with respect
> to this ONE act is similar to the thinking of children and pervasive in
> our culture. Troll, indeed.

You have been utterly incoherent.

> I have previously demonstrated that this position is inconsistent within
> the criminal code as well.

Nope.

>
> Where did you learn that I was responsible for the actions and outcomes
> of others. It certainly wasn't taught in any classroom or university
> that I attended.

Attended but were tossed out unceremoniously for inability to think.