In article et>,
"rick etter" > wrote:

> "Ron" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article et>,
> > "rick etter" > wrote:
> >
> >> When he knowingly makes choices that result in the death and suffering of
> >> animals, despite the fact that he claims to care and make no effort to
> >> make
> >> other choices, then yes.
> >
> > I am not responsible for the outcome of your choices.
> ===========================
> Very good fool. No one ever claimed that. You, however are responsible
> for *your* choices.

Of course, you did. The outcome of a dead animal from a farmers action
of killing is holding me accountable for the outcome of their action.

> When a producer of
> > food kills to accomplish there goals they are responsible for the
> > actions not each and every possible outcome.
> >
> > I give one animal an antibiotic and it lives. I give an animal and
> > anitbiotic and it dies. I have performed the same ACT in both cases. The
> > outcomes are independent of my actions. My actions are coincidental and
> > not causal.
> =====================
> Tap, tap, tap.. Keep telling yourself that pansy-boy....

I guess you do get to feel special and important thinking that what you
do is causing farmers and growers to kill animals. That's quite a feat
there.