In article t>,
Jay Santos > wrote:

> Ron wrote:
>
> > In article t>,
> > Jay Santos > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Ron wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>In article t>,
> >>> Jay Santos > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Ron wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>In article >, "Dutch" >
> >>>>>wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>"Scented Nectar" > wrote
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>The argument is plain, and you can't even begin to
> >>>>>>>>rebut it.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>The conclusion is clear: you don't believe at all that
> >>>>>>>>it is wrong to kill animals.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>><rebut> If I don't believe that it's wrong to kill
> >>>>>>>animals then why do I feel good about lessening
> >>>>>>>their deaths? Huh? </rebut>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>If you really thought it was "wrong" you would find a way to do much
> >>>>>>more
> >>>>>>than you are doing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Thank you for repeating yourself...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>If you really thought it was wrong, you would find a way to do much more
> >>>>>about sexually broomed children.
> >>>>
> >>>>No, we're talking about YOU not doing any of something
> >>>>that YOU consider absolutely wrong. Until you stop
> >>>>doing it, you have no basis for trying to prevent
> >>>>others from doing it.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>This is a contradiction to the position of moral requirements.
> >>
> >>No, it isn't. It is absolutely essential to "moral
> >>requirements".
> >>
> >>You stupid gerbil-abusing homo.
> >
> >
> > I assume that you don't and never have broomed children. I further
> > assume since that you have stopped or never started that you know accept
> > your moral responsibility to stop all others from this action.
>
> No, recognizing that something is absolutely wrong does
> not make it my personal responsibility to stop others
> from doing it. You keep asserting that it does, and
> you are wrong.

But you do make this a requirement for the vegan.

The vegan is not responsible for stopping the farmer, or the petro
executive who does kill animals because of her belief of an absolute
wrong.


> > Do be clear in your thinking, Dutch!
>
> Get Bruce's 3 centimeters out of your ass, Ron, and
> keep track of whom you're responding to. Stupid
> brain-damaged homo; the HIV is that advanced, eh?

I apologized to Dutch already for the misattribution.

PS. Who is Bruce?