Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed 29 Jun 2005 03:49:25p, Michel Boucher wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> Wayne Boatwright > wrote in > : > >> On Wed 29 Jun 2005 06:10:39a, Michel Boucher wrote in >> rec.food.cooking: >> >>> Wayne Boatwright > wrote in >>> : >>> >>>> On Tue 28 Jun 2005 11:19:01p, sf wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>>> >>>>> So, cease and desist! Your daughter got pierced in Quebec >>>>> City... she's over it, but Michel is still defending his >>>>> territory. Pitiful. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Well, I guess somebody has to, and it might as well be Michel. >>> >>> Chee, I don't know what she's going on about. I was merely >>> asking. But that's me, damned if I do and damned if I don't. >>> After all these years on rfc, I'm pretty well used to >>> narrow-minded of totally inappropriate interpretations of anything at >>> all I might say. >> >> Kinda reminds me of the old pop lyric, "...why is everybody always >> pickin' on me..." But that was just a song lyric. > > Then again, maybe it's just an observation :-) > Good return! -- Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬ ____________________________________________ Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day. Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974 |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Boatwright > wrote in
: >>> Kinda reminds me of the old pop lyric, "...why is everybody >>> always pickin' on me..." But that was just a song lyric. >> >> Then again, maybe it's just an observation :-) > > Good return! Thank you for the opportunity to slip that in to what is an otherwise humourless exchange. And if we're not having fun, what the fork are we doing here? -- "Compassion is the chief law of human existence." Dostoevski, The Idiot |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed 29 Jun 2005 04:05:16p, Michel Boucher wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> Wayne Boatwright > wrote in > : > >>>> Kinda reminds me of the old pop lyric, "...why is everybody always >>>> pickin' on me..." But that was just a song lyric. >>> >>> Then again, maybe it's just an observation :-) >> >> Good return! > > Thank you for the opportunity to slip that in to what is an otherwise > humourless exchange. And if we're not having fun, what the fork are we > doing here? > Agreed, Michel. I sometimes think your zeal is beyond some of the folks here, but I enjoy it. -- Wayne Boatwright *¿* ____________________________________________ Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day. Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974 --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0526-2, 06/29/2005 Tested on: 6/29/2005 7:19:27 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dan Abel wrote: > > We like to joke with our daughter, because now that she has the tattoo, > she can't change religions. The tattoo is of the symbol of our church, a > flaming chalice: > > http://www.uua.org/aboutuu/chalice.html > > -- > Dan Abel > Sonoma State University > AIS > Oh, another UU head. Nice to meet cha! Cool idea for a tat, BTW... -L. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Graphic Queen wrote: > I am speaking about people in the U.S. and not Africans or Aborigines > who have been doing such things for centuries. That is their culture. > It is not ours. And God knows nobody in the US retains the culture of their homeland. <rolling eyes> -L. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Graphic Queen wrote: > Well, I have no idea about a bigot such as yourself but I am half > Apache and damn proud of it and am sick of the European and Mexicans > screwing up this country. So what you are saying is that you hate half of yourself. That explains everything. -L. (snickering) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() droopy wrote: > > Point is that freaky hairstyles, clothing and piercing are fads that are > easily reversed (unless you are grandma) but tattoos are hard to get rid > of... > > D Not any longer - with the advent of multi-wavelength laser technology. -L. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Graphic Queen wrote:
> On 30 Jun 2005 00:28:17 -0700, "-L." > wrote: > > >> >>droopy wrote: >> >>>Point is that freaky hairstyles, clothing and piercing are fads that are >>>easily reversed (unless you are grandma) but tattoos are hard to get rid >>>of... >>> >>>D >> >>Not any longer - with the advent of multi-wavelength laser technology. >> >>-L. > > > Yeah, the tax payers get to pay for the idiot gang members to remove > their gang tattoos when they decide to quite the gang. We shouldn't of > course. They should be stuck with them unless they can pay for it > themselves. what the hell are you talking about? -- saerah "It's not a gimmick, it's an incentive."- asterbark, afca aware of the manifold possibilities of the future "I think there's a clause in the Shaman's and Jujumen's Local #57 Union contract that they have to have reciprocity for each other's shop rules." -König Prüß |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sarah bennett > wrote in
: >> Yeah, the tax payers get to pay for the idiot gang members to >> remove their gang tattoos when they decide to quite the gang. We >> shouldn't of course. They should be stuck with them unless they >> can pay for it themselves. > > what the hell are you talking about? Don't worry about it. I have a feeling your lack of comprehension will be soon revealed by Graphic Queen to be caused by your heretofore hidden Eurocentric bigotry which has now come to the fore. This is her justification for any perceived criticism. It's unfortunate that people can post without a license. -- "Compassion is the chief law of human existence." Dostoevski, The Idiot |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michel Boucher wrote:
<snipped all that stuff about removing tattoos> > > It's unfortunate that people can post without a license. > As someone already pointed out, if "people" needed a license to post, you'd probably be talking to yourself... ![]() Cathy -- I don't suffer from insanity - I enjoy every minute of it |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() sarah bennett wrote: > > what the hell are you talking about? I think she toked the pipe one too many times. -L. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Graphic Queen > wrote in
: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:43:42 -0500, Michel Boucher > > wrote: > >>sarah bennett > wrote in om: >> >>>> Yeah, the tax payers get to pay for the idiot gang members to >>>> remove their gang tattoos when they decide to quite the gang. >>>> We shouldn't of course. They should be stuck with them unless >>>> they can pay for it themselves. >>> >>> what the hell are you talking about? >> >>Don't worry about it. I have a feeling your lack of comprehension >>will be soon revealed by Graphic Queen to be caused by your >>heretofore hidden Eurocentric bigotry which has now come to the >>fore. This is her justification for any perceived criticism. >> >>It's unfortunate that people can post without a license. > > Yes it is and you are proof of that. It is too bad that Microsoft > ever came along and made it so easy for everyone to be connected > to the net. It was much better back in the day when one had to > know Unix and DOS to be connected and way before the idiot WWW > part of the net. I see...hmmm...plonk? -- "Compassion is the chief law of human existence." Dostoevski, The Idiot |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:30:21 GMT, Graphic Queen wrote:
> > You didn't know that the taxpayers, via municipalities, pay to have > the gang tattoos taken off of supposed ex-gang members that wish to > have them removed? This is being done all over the country and all of > the regular tax paying citizens are the ones paying for it. > I knew it is done in my area, but maybe it's not done in all parts of the country. Personally, I don't mind paying for tattoo removal. If they can become a taxpaying contributor - it's money well spent. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, Graphic Queen
> wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:22:17 -0700, (Dan Abel) wrote: > >You forget that Al Gore invented the net. Everybody knows that. MS did > >very little. > > hahahahahaha My oh my, I didn't know that. Lot's of things that you don't know, aren't there? Everybody knows that: http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp -- Dan Abel Sonoma State University AIS |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 20:28:40 GMT, Graphic Queen wrote:
> What someone does has > consequences and this is just another way for people to not have to > face the consequences themself of said consequences. They want them > removed then they should pay for them themselves. They had the darn > money to pay for them in the first place. Tattoos are like marriage - easy to get into and hard to get out of. Like I said before, if those people can become taxpaying members of our community by staying of trouble (jail), staying off welfare and holding down a job - that person is contributing to the tax base instead of draining it. So, I still think it's money well spent. Socialist thinking has nothing to do with it. It's practical. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, Graphic Queen
> wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:13:32 -0700, (Dan Abel) wrote: > > >In article >, Graphic Queen > > wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:22:17 -0700, (Dan Abel) wrote: > > > > > >> >You forget that Al Gore invented the net. Everybody knows that. MS did > >> >very little. > >> > >> hahahahahaha My oh my, I didn't know that. > > > > > >Lot's of things that you don't know, aren't there? Everybody knows that: > > > > > >http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp > > You are one stupid ignorant red neck if you really think I thought > that Gore invented the internet. That came from you not me. I know > more about the internet than you could ever hope to but you go ahead > and think you proved something, which of course you didn't. And, you > don't seem to know anything about sarcasm. Maybe you should learn > about that before posting such tripe. I thought that I proved that I know more about sarcasm than you did. I've been taking lessons from Michel Boucher, after all. Of course, both of us tend to hit a little wide of the mark sometimes. -- Dan Abel Sonoma State University AIS |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Graphic Queen wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:18:43 -0700, sf > wrote: > >> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:30:21 GMT, Graphic Queen wrote: >>> >>> You didn't know that the taxpayers, via municipalities, pay to have >>> the gang tattoos taken off of supposed ex-gang members that wish to >>> have them removed? This is being done all over the country and all of >>> the regular tax paying citizens are the ones paying for it. >>> >> I knew it is done in my area, but maybe it's not done in all parts of >> the country. Personally, I don't mind paying for tattoo removal. If >> they can become a taxpaying contributor - it's money well spent. > > I am glad that you feel that way. I don't and neither do many > citizens, though many feel as you do. wtf? why would you be glad that someone disagrees with you? don't make no sense. > What someone does has > consequences and this is just another way for people to not have to > face the consequences themself of said consequences. They want them > removed then they should pay for them themselves. They had the darn > money to pay for them in the first place. It is not right that other > citizens should pay for something like that. We already have to pay > too high of taxes for things that we shouldn't in the first place. > Apparently many believe as you do and you have the right to believe > that way but don't be upset when you continue to live in a socialist > country and it will only get worse. What's your beef with socialism? It's what all advanced societies have, in this day and age. You want pure capitalism... go look atRussia. Lena liberal, both economic and social |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, Graphic Queen
> wrote: > See ya now. You can go back and play on your mommy's computer. That was a low blow. I still think of my dear departed mother fairly often, although it will be 33 years this fall since she died. Upon this note, I will leave this part of the thread. I'm not contributing anything of value to this group here. -- Dan Abel Sonoma State University AIS |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Abel wrote:
>>>I still think of my dear departed mother fairly >>>often, although it will be 33 years this fall since she died. >> >>{{{{{ Dan }}}}} > > > > Thanks. I do still miss my mommy. > Yeah, we all miss 'em. Mine passed 15 years ago tomorrow (July 2) and I miss her. She would have loved to live to see Dan Rather *retire*, lol. Goomba |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
mind your own business | General Cooking | |||
Mind those chillis!! | General Cooking | |||
Rebel chef Anthony Bourdain tells it like it is, with a few reservations | General Cooking | |||
I Don't Mind the Rind | General Cooking | |||
Ah, the scientific mind... | General Cooking |