On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:27:59 -0600, graham > wrote:

>On 23/10/2015 2:14 PM, sf wrote:
>> On 10/23/2015 12:52 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2015-10-23 3:35 PM, Janet B wrote:
>>>
>>>> One only has to look at politics and supporters in the US today to
>>>> realize how many un-educated, simple-minded, gullible people there are
>>>> around. As I said, I don't figure anyone hear would fall for the scam
>>>> but hundreds of thousands will.
>>>> It is the goal of scams to find those people.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't have to look south of the border for simple-minded gullible
>>> voters. We have lots of them here. At least there are more mainstream
>>> parties so things are not quite as polarized.
>>>
>> A socialist paradise of simple-minded gullible voters. Pass!
>> --
>> Barbara J Llorente, 71 Cerritos Ave San Francisco, CA 94127.
>
>As opposed to a country full of simple-minded, gullible voters who
>support Trump! Pass!
>Graham

Dave will ultimately be happy, I hear on the grapevine that Ford
intends to run for the Con leadership - hence the sponsoring of a
loser - then it will be like having a Trump around

On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:48:07 -0600, Villanueva > wrote:

> sf wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 12:46:24 -0600, Villanueva > wrote:
> >
> >> sf wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:45:25 -0600, Janet B >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I'm guessing that everyone in this group knows that. This particular
> >>>> scam is the largest ever in the US and has suckered millions of
> >>>> dollars from the gullible. They have been calling me for almost a
> >>>> year now. I think their calling machine has a crush on my answering
> >>>> machine.
> >>>
> >>> What's really funny is somehow my cell number was given out for people
> >>> to call, so I got to tell them it was a scam and not to fall for it.
> >>> Just doing my part to protect the gullible from themselves.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Log all the harassing calls that come in, this is actionable.
> >
> > It was just the clueless responding to calls from the gullible,
> > nothing that bothered me. Certainly no harassment from the original
> > party. The calls stopped once they got a clue that their marks were
> > dialing a wrong number.
> >
>
> It's almost worth posting a honeypot number and using a cheap tracfone
> to round up the froggers and their gang of bullies, innit?

At this point I am happy knowing how deeply I'm embedded their heads.

--

sf

On 10/22/2015 8:03 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 19:44:38 -0400, Cheryl >
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/18/2015 5:44 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 17:32:25 -0400, Dave Smith
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> A couple months ago I got a call from "the income tax department"
>>>> telling me I had been audited and owed them money and had to pay it
>>>> immediately.
>>>
>>> Heh. We get that one too. I've apparently been in trouble with the tax
>>> department twice so far... the last time, a message was left on my
>>> machine from a 'Scott Thompson' from the Australian Tax Office, who
>>> couldn't have sounded less anglo-saxon if he tried.
>>>
>> I've been getting that call often lately. I can see why some might be
>> gullible enough to fall for it, they do sound real. But I've already
>> been hearing about these calls so I ignore them.
>
> The IRS NEVER calls, they send snail mail.
>
Yes I know, and some of what they send should have to be signed for, and
they don't do that.

--
ღ.¸¸.œ«*¨`*œ¶
Cheryl

On 10/23/2015 3:24 PM, Cheryl wrote:
> On 10/22/2015 8:03 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 19:44:38 -0400, Cheryl >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/18/2015 5:44 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 17:32:25 -0400, Dave Smith
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> A couple months ago I got a call from "the income tax department"
>>>>> telling me I had been audited and owed them money and had to pay it
>>>>> immediately.
>>>>
>>>> Heh. We get that one too. I've apparently been in trouble with the tax
>>>> department twice so far... the last time, a message was left on my
>>>> machine from a 'Scott Thompson' from the Australian Tax Office, who
>>>> couldn't have sounded less anglo-saxon if he tried.
>>>>
>>> I've been getting that call often lately. I can see why some might be
>>> gullible enough to fall for it, they do sound real. But I've already
>>> been hearing about these calls so I ignore them.
>>
>> The IRS NEVER calls, they send snail mail.
>>
> Yes I know, and some of what they send should have to be signed for, and
> they don't do that.
>
+1
--
Barbara J Llorente, 71 Cerritos Ave San Francisco, CA 94127.

On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:27:59 -0600, graham > wrote:

> On 23/10/2015 2:14 PM, sf wrote:
> > On 10/23/2015 12:52 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't have to look south of the border for simple-minded gullible
> >> voters. We have lots of them here. At least there are more mainstream
> >> parties so things are not quite as polarized.
> >>
> > A socialist paradise of simple-minded gullible voters. Pass!
> > --
> > Barbara J Llorente, 71 Cerritos Ave San Francisco, CA 94127.
>
> As opposed to a country full of simple-minded, gullible voters who
> support Trump! Pass!
> Graham

Check your headers: X-Complaints-To:

As far as your Trump evaluation, I agree with your assessment. Same
for Carson, who is now ahead of Trump in Iowa.

--

sf

On 10/23/2015 3:18 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:27:59 -0600, graham > wrote:
>
>> On 23/10/2015 2:14 PM, sf wrote:
>>> On 10/23/2015 12:52 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>> On 2015-10-23 3:35 PM, Janet B wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> One only has to look at politics and supporters in the US today to
>>>>> realize how many un-educated, simple-minded, gullible people there are
>>>>> around. As I said, I don't figure anyone hear would fall for the scam
>>>>> but hundreds of thousands will.
>>>>> It is the goal of scams to find those people.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't have to look south of the border for simple-minded gullible
>>>> voters. We have lots of them here. At least there are more mainstream
>>>> parties so things are not quite as polarized.
>>>>
>>> A socialist paradise of simple-minded gullible voters. Pass!
>>> --
>>> Barbara J Llorente, 71 Cerritos Ave San Francisco, CA 94127.
>>
>> As opposed to a country full of simple-minded, gullible voters who
>> support Trump! Pass!
>> Graham
>
> Dave will ultimately be happy, I hear on the grapevine that Ford
> intends to run for the Con leadership - hence the sponsoring of a
> loser - then it will be like having a Trump around
>
+1
--
Barbara J Llorente, 71 Cerritos Ave San Francisco, CA 94127.

On 10/23/2015 2:29 PM, Janet B wrote:

> How many people are totally confident that they have done their taxes
> correctly -- that they didn't miss something? And then having the
> threat of the sheriff coming to your door with a warrant unless you
> respond immediately, it strikes fear. The phone call is very, very
> threatening.

It really is. But since the calls have been coming since August and no
one has shown up at my door, well...

--
ღ.¸¸.œ«*¨`*œ¶
Cheryl

On 10/23/2015 3:48 PM, wrote:

> Much of the time they are elderly. Reviews of scams here certainly
> show that. I know my aunt in Australia when she was around 90 was
> continually scammed, fortunately my cousin discovered it when she was
> down about A$10,000 and got it stopped.

And the reason the elderly are often targeted isn't because scammers
think they are gullible, it is because the elderly in general have more
money than the rest of the population. Fact as stated by the FTC in a
few recent community townhall type meetings. I hate that stereotype that
the elderly are gullible, and no, you didn't say that. I just wanted to
add my 2pennies.

--
ღ.¸¸.œ«*¨`*œ¶
Cheryl

Cheri wrote:
> In article >,
> says...
>>
>> On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 3:35:59 PM UTC-6, wrote:
>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:02:39 -0400, Dave Smith
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2015-10-19 9:10 AM, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> I explained to you before. We now have fixed election dates. The vote
>>>>>> was going to be held today no matter when it was announced. It should
>>>>>> not be a surprise to anyone.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Sigh-
>>>>
>>>> That's usually the first limply chosen comment when frustrated by one's
>>>> inability to convince someone of something silly.
>>>>
>>>>> it was HIS decision to drop the writ so early leading to the
>>>>> longest election period since sometime in the early 1800s (I think it
>>>>> was then) Yes, I know we have fixed election dates but it would seem
>>>>> you are missing a few facts.
>>>>
>>>> I am not missing any facts. Politicians start campaigning long before
>>>> an election is called. Anyone who reads or listens to the news and the
>>>> projects they were planning for the future.... meaning in a year or two
>>>> ,... if they get elected... would have seen that they were gearing up
>>>> for an election.
>>>>
>>>> The fixed date means that it was going to be Oct. 19 no matter what. No
>>>> one should be surprised. All the parties should have been ready for it.
>>>> My wife is a member of one of the other parties and they were holding
>>>> meetings and making plans way ahead of the election call. Granted, the
>>>> media have tried to make something of it and there is no doubt that they
>>>> would suck people into thinking it really mattered.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=0V5ckcTSYu8
>>>
>>> That's a link to something your wife will enjoy.
>>
>> I played it a couple of times tonight...good video...thanks.
>> I see WE listened as Harper and his CONs were swept OUT...good show Canada.
>
> Idiots. Enjoy your socialist paradise of misery LOL!
>
>

It's OK, they will love their new deficits and toke until their worries
all waft away!

wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:27:59 -0600, graham > wrote:
>
>> On 23/10/2015 2:14 PM, sf wrote:
>>> On 10/23/2015 12:52 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>> On 2015-10-23 3:35 PM, Janet B wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> One only has to look at politics and supporters in the US today to
>>>>> realize how many un-educated, simple-minded, gullible people there are
>>>>> around. As I said, I don't figure anyone hear would fall for the scam
>>>>> but hundreds of thousands will.
>>>>> It is the goal of scams to find those people.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't have to look south of the border for simple-minded gullible
>>>> voters. We have lots of them here. At least there are more mainstream
>>>> parties so things are not quite as polarized.
>>>>
>>> A socialist paradise of simple-minded gullible voters. Pass!
>>> --
>>> Barbara J Llorente, 71 Cerritos Ave San Francisco, CA 94127.
>>
>> As opposed to a country full of simple-minded, gullible voters who
>> support Trump! Pass!
>> Graham
>
> Dave will ultimately be happy, I hear on the grapevine that Ford
> intends to run for the Con leadership - hence the sponsoring of a
> loser - then it will be like having a Trump around
>


Still spewing spite and venom even after your side won.

Tsk...

You hateful biotch.

sf wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:48:07 -0600, Villanueva > wrote:
>
>> sf wrote:
>>> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 12:46:24 -0600, Villanueva > wrote:
>>>
>>>> sf wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:45:25 -0600, Janet B >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm guessing that everyone in this group knows that. This particular
>>>>>> scam is the largest ever in the US and has suckered millions of
>>>>>> dollars from the gullible. They have been calling me for almost a
>>>>>> year now. I think their calling machine has a crush on my answering
>>>>>> machine.
>>>>>
>>>>> What's really funny is somehow my cell number was given out for people
>>>>> to call, so I got to tell them it was a scam and not to fall for it.
>>>>> Just doing my part to protect the gullible from themselves.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Log all the harassing calls that come in, this is actionable.
>>>
>>> It was just the clueless responding to calls from the gullible,
>>> nothing that bothered me. Certainly no harassment from the original
>>> party. The calls stopped once they got a clue that their marks were
>>> dialing a wrong number.
>>>
>>
>> It's almost worth posting a honeypot number and using a cheap tracfone
>> to round up the froggers and their gang of bullies, innit?
>
> At this point I am happy knowing how deeply I'm embedded their heads.
>

I don't think even the CIA has ever had an asset that far in, lol...

On 10/15/2015 8:03 AM, l not -l wrote:

> On 14-Oct-2015, John Kuthe > wrote:
>
>> I need to get some ice cube trays
>> made in USA. Know of any?
>
> Maybe you can find some through this site or its discussion forum.
> http://keepitusamade.com/links.htm
>
I think it's safer to let him live without booze if he needs some ice
cube trays to drink it.

--
ღ.¸¸.œ«*¨`*œ¶
Cheryl

"Cheryl" > wrote in message
eb.com...
> On 10/15/2015 8:03 AM, l not -l wrote:
>
>> On 14-Oct-2015, John Kuthe > wrote:
>>
>>> I need to get some ice cube trays
>>> made in USA. Know of any?
>>
>> Maybe you can find some through this site or its discussion forum.
>> http://keepitusamade.com/links.htm
>>
> I think it's safer to let him live without booze if he needs some ice cube
> trays to drink it.
>
> --
> ღ.¸¸.œ«*¨`*œ¶
> Cheryl

LOL



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 10/24/2015 10:15 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> As for who's forging Barbie, the jury is still out
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>> Omelet wrote:
>
>> He hates me 'cause I never slept with him...
>
> He hates himself because he is all he has to sleep with
> I don't know, sometimes he used to seem normal, then he went petty
> trough vindictive and now I just shun contact. I have enough crazies to
> deal with in my world without encouraging those who refuse to take their
> meds.

For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And
you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was
going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the
total blue.

After having met you twice at casual austin.food gatherings 2 or 3
years ago and not giving you any indication that there was any sort of
romantic interest in the least, you somehow twisted that into MY
MOVING IN WITH YOU?

That was just way too Psycho for me. I sat there at stared at the
screen for at least 15 minutes wondering, WTF? That was just way too
spooky. I've met weird, semi-psycho women before but you win, hands
down. Mapi of austin.general still holds the male title, but at least
he announced his psychosis right there lying on the floor of the bar
at B.D. Reilly's rather than romantically obsessing over me for 2
years.

Needless to say, you need to come to terms with what happened and why
your mind works that way and stop making up excuses for your fixation
and disappointment before we become the next Yoli and Michael. I'd
prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

And Jeremy, I was just tired of your decade of bullshit and visions of
grandeur about all these things you're "working on" or have not done
in the past. Even posting a call for meetings with imaginary people
about imaginary projects of yours at "the normal time and place", as
if you are somebody important with a life. I'm pretty sure you're
manic depressive mixed with habitual liar.

Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---