>"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Jeßus wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Pre-cooked bacon?? Does that actually exist?
>>>>
>>>> Prefried bacon has existed for at least 50 years that I know of,
>>>> developed by the US Navy for saving reefer space aboard ship... it's
>>>> canned, requires no refrigeration, and has a shelf life of some 15
>>>> years... refered to as Petrified Bacon. All that's required is to
>>>> open the can at both ends, push out bacon (it's rolled with parchment
>>>> paper between layers), and heat on griddle, in oven, or deep fryer to
>>>> desired degree of doneness (it's precooked to just before crisp, with
>>>> much of the rendered fat removed)... happens to be excellent bacon.
>>>> The can is about 1 liter sized and contains the equivalent of 5 lbs
>>>> raw bacon. There are commercial brands now, I've not tried any.
>>>
>>> This isn't canned. I know that this kind has existed for at least 10
>>> years. First time I bought some was in PA. I get it at Costco. There is
>>> far too much in the package for us to finish before it goes bad so I
>>> portion it out and freeze it.

Probably requires refrigeration.

Canned can sit in your pantry.
http://www.amazon.com/Cans-full-Yode.../dp/B0039LDMV6
Hmm:
http://www.amazon.com/Mountain-House...ze+dried+bacon

On 2014-09-22 10:45 AM, Cheri wrote:
>
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> Some of the regs here are now on they home repair newsgroup telling
>> people not to help me because I am crazy. This is making me really
>> angry.
>
> I'm not at all surprised, the people that follow you from group to group
> are definitely a "type" much like the Dementors in Harry Potter.

Do they follow her from group to group, or does she just get the same
reaction from normal people in different groups because of her bizarre
posts, comments and lies?

"Julie Bove" > wrote:
> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote:
>>> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote:
>>>>> "Pico Rico" > wrote in message >>
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message >
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> On 9/21/2014 8:38 AM, Gary wrote:
>>>>>>>> Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes. The schedule is insane! Now I know why so many dancers
>>>>>>>>> drop >>>>>>>> >>>>>> out >>>> by
>>>>>>>>> high school. They just haven't got enough time what with the ever
>>>>>>>>> increasing homework load.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Those dancers are mostly dancer-wannbees and will never get a career
>>>>>>>> in it. One would think that responsible parents would make sure they
>>>>>>>> dropped out of the stupid dance classes rather than drop out of high
>>>>>>>> school. This can't be for real.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> G.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I only personally knew one very talented girl who benefited from >>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>> dance lessons. But she was truly a good ballet dancer. Graceful
>>>>>>>>> and >> fluid. AFTER she graduated HS she did go to NYC and she got
>>>>>>>>> some >> secondary roles in some NYC Ballet productions. Did she
>>>>>>>>> become a star? >> Nope.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Parents who think dance class is going to lead to some great career >>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>> deluding themselves. Same thing with the ones who think if their
>>>>>>>>> boys >> are good at HS football they'll go on to become >>>>>>>> professional
>>>>>>>>> athletes. >> There are very few who make the grade.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But many of them wreck their bodies, and with no big paycheck to
>>>>>> show >>>>> >>> for > it.
>>>>>
>>>>> If they are wrecking their bodies, they either not getting proper
>>>>> instruction or are not following it. Our studio will not let students
>>>>> dance with injuries. Yes, my daughter had injuries twice. One was
>>>>> because of the other and because she did not keep up with the proper >>>> core
>>>>> strengthening exercises. But the other? Can not be proven how it
>>>>> happened. It may well have happened during ballet because when she was
>>>>> doing leaning back movements, she was merely leaning back and not >>>> lifting
>>>>> from her core. She also had a move in hip hop that made her lean back
>>>>> very far. The injury was a stress fracture to her back.
>>>>
>>>> Previously you stated that this was a "near stress fracture". So was it >>> a
>>>> stress fracture or not?
>>>
>>> *sigh*
>>>
>>> And then after that when she had the loose vertebrae, I took her back to
>>> the physical therapist after first taking her to the walk in clinic.
>>> They did an X Ray and told me that while the Orthopedic guy had told us
>>> it was a near stress fracture, at some point, it did go into a full on
>>> stress fracture and they showed me where it had healed, on the X Ray.
>>>
>>> What is with you people? Do you sit around trying to remember every
>>> single thing that I ever said? If so, you are failing.
>>
>> You people?? What is with *you*?! You tell the same damn sad sack > stories
>> over and over again ad nauseam. Each and every time the details change
>> ever so slightly. It isn't hard to remember them at all they're so
>> ludicrous.
>>
>> *sigh*!!
>
> Some people here, like you, are forcing me to say the same things over
> and over because you keep asking the same things. Like Jill with her
> repeatedly saying that I never said why I am disabled or that she didn't
> know why or however she phrased it. And I'm sure there are a lot of
> details of my life that people here don't know. Contrary to what is
> often said, I don't post everything here. But again, I came here to
> discuss food. And again, other people turned this thread into something else.

If you kept your stories free of embellishments and exaggerations, no one
would question them. You're your own worst enemy, not us.
--
jinx the minx

"Julie Bove" > wrote:
> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote:
>>> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote:
>>>>> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Jeßus > wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:05:06 -0400, jmcquown >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mmmm, but eggs are nice.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I scrambled a couple in butter and had them with buttered wheat >>>>>>> toast.
>>>>>>>> I didn't break out in any rashes, either.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm nearly drowning in eggs at the moment and need a break from them,
>>>>>>> had eggs for breakfast 3 mornings in a row, I think just tomato onion
>>>>>>> and cheese on toast for me this morning.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I thought about cooking some
>>>>>>>> (streaky) bacon but darn, that would have been too difficult.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cooking bacon yourself? Who the hell does that any more??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did, just this morning. Yum!
>>>>>
>>>>> I have never bought cooked bacon! DH loves bacon, eggs and mushrooms
>>>>> with toast for breakfast and I am happy to cook it for him
>>>>>
>>>>> Thinking about it, I don't think I have ever seen ready cooked bacon
>>>>> >> >>>> rashers ...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I cook my bacon in the oven--easy peasy. Pre-cooked is passable in a > >>> pinch
>>>> if it's going into something, like crumbled in a salad or on a baked
>>>> potato, but I would never, ever consider heating it up and eating it on >>> > its
>>>> own. Ick.
>>>
>>> Why? It's very good.
>>
>> Perhaps your neuropathy has affected your taste buds.
>
> Nope. I don't know what kind you buy. I buy Hormel. Doesn't taste any
> different than what the raw Hormel would taste like if I cooked it.

I'm picky about the meat to fat ratio on my bacon. I don't find the
precooked kind to be especially meaty, and as Hormel is local company, it's
the standard brand here. Like I said, I find it to be okay crumbled in
something, but I would not consider serving it as is. I prefer to feed my
family fresh food I've cooked myself in my own kitchen. You prefer to feed
your family food that's been cooked in a factory, frozen, shipped, and
reheated in a microwave. No thanks.
--
jinx the minx

On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:34:27 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

> I had her KFed for a while, but there are a couple other compulsive
> posters who responded to almost every one of her posts, usually quoting
> the entire text only to add one line at the end. Then there were a bunch
> of others who seemed to be taking her seriously. There was no escaping
> the idiocy, so I figured I may as well see them first hand and have some
> fun with them.
>

Please don't go all holier than thou on us. You were replying when
she was in my KF, so you're one of the people you're complaining
about.


--
Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them.

On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 22:19:18 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
> "Cheryl" > wrote in message
> web.com...
> > On 9/20/2014 9:57 AM, Gary wrote:
> >
> >> Chemo wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Here's an idea.........teach her or just tell her to make her own
> >>> breakfast. If she can drive a car she can cook.
> >>
> >> I can't believe they bought her a car as soon as she turned 16 and got
> >> her driver's license. How many people here had that perk? Certainly
> >> not me.
> >>
> >> G.
> >>
> > When I was 16 my husband and me shared a car.
>
> I didn't get my first car until I was 19. I had to share one with my mom
> prior.

Poor you. I didn't get a car of my own until after I was married and
we're back down to one again.


--
Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them.

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> Poor you. I didn't get a car of my own until after I was married and
> we're back down to one again.

Same here, and didn't get a new car until in my 40's.

Cheri

On 2014-09-22 11:46 AM, Cheri wrote:
>
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Poor you. I didn't get a car of my own until after I was married and
>> we're back down to one again.
>
> Same here, and didn't get a new car until in my 40's.
>
My son got his first car last year at the age of 36. After he graduated
from high school he went to work in Africa for 8 months, then came back
and went to university. He lived in Montreal and Toronto for 13 years
and both cities had public transit that suited his needs. When he moved
back down this way and had a much better paying job and no transit to
get to work he bought a car.

On Monday, September 22, 2014 4:42:16 AM UTC-10, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> dsi1 <> wrote:
>
> >Cheri wrote:
>
> >> "Dave Smith" wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> > Of course not. You just quote it and send it back so that Julie, who
>
> >>
>
> >> > claims to have me KFed will see it. I have seen pictures of the kid and
>
> >>
>
> >> > they sure don't present the image of a kid who is keeping fit through
>
> >>
>
> >> > dance. Perhaps we need to be reminded that Julie has said that the
>
> >>
>
> >> > daughter was a dancer, and she also said that she was disabled.
>
> >>
>
> >> As I said, I've known Julie for years, since her daughter was a young child
>
> >>
>
> >> and I think it's disgusting the way people talk about a young girl in such a
>
> >>
>
> >> way. It says a lot about them at any rate. If you want to talk about her
>
> >>
>
> >> daughter, talk to someone else.
>
> >>
>
> >> Cheri
>
> >
>
> >Let's face it, regular folks don't say nasty ass things about other people's kids -
>
>
>
> Regular folks don't say nasty things about their own children.

This is probably true. That don't mean that all ya'all ain't gonna burn in hell. Ha ha ha. 😈

On 2014-09-22 12:58 PM, dsi1 wrote:


>> Regular folks don't say nasty things about their own children.
>
> This is probably true. That don't mean that all ya'all ain't gonna
> burn in hell. Ha ha ha. 😈

It never occurred to me that it was a possibility. I think the point is
that a person cannot use this forum to vent about all the horrible
things her husband and daughter do that frustrate her so much and then
complain that people express opinions about her daughter based on what
her own mother has repeatedly posted about her.

On Monday, September 22, 2014 7:03:46 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2014-09-22 12:58 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >> Regular folks don't say nasty things about their own children.
>
> >
>
> > This is probably true. That don't mean that all ya'all ain't gonna
>
> > burn in hell. Ha ha ha. 😈
>
>
>
> It never occurred to me that it was a possibility. I think the point is
>
> that a person cannot use this forum to vent about all the horrible
>
> things her husband and daughter do that frustrate her so much and then
>
> complain that people express opinions about her daughter based on what
>
> her own mother has repeatedly posted about her.

If you're saying that you have no control over what others post, I's say that was absolutely true. What's alarming is people don't seem to have any control over what they post themselves.

"Cherry" > wrote in message
...
> I have never bought cooked bacon! DH loves bacon, eggs and mushrooms with
> toast for breakfast and I am happy to cook it for him
>
> Thinking about it, I don't think I have ever seen ready cooked bacon
> rashers
> --
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/
>
> Ophelia, it is in most of the supermarkets now, usually in the chiller
> with the packages of sliced ham. It's streaky bacon fried crispy and
> handy to have if you want to make a quick BLT. However, its not cheap so
> I only get it when on special or I find it on the reduced shelf.

Heh, who knew) Thanks, Cherry I doubt I will buy them anyway but it is
interesting to know about.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Cheri" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Pico Rico" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Cheri" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On 9/21/2014 9:10 AM, Gary wrote:
>>>>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes. The schedule is insane! Now I know why so many dancers drop
>>>>>>>> out by
>>>>>>>> high school. They just haven't got enough time what with the ever
>>>>>>>> increasing homework load.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Those dancers are mostly dancer-wannbees and will never get a career
>>>>>>> in it. One would think that responsible parents would make sure they
>>>>>>> dropped out of the stupid dance classes rather than drop out of high
>>>>>>> school. This can't be for real.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry. After I posted that I realized that you probably meant that
>>>>>> they dropped out of dance class, not HS. That's a good choice, imwo.
>>>>>> :-D
>>>>>>
>>>>> No, you didn't get it wrong. She said they drop out of High School.
>>>>> Because of the homework.
>>>>
>>>> Nah, she didn't say that. She said they drop out of dance *by* high
>>>> school because there is so much homework in high school.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Actually, as usual, we don't know what she said. " . . . rather than
>>> drop out of high school." So, apparently she is wishing that the
>>> parents would be more responsible and have them drop dancing rather than
>>> HS. But it is all a bunch of goof with her anyway.
>>
>> Well, in this case, I think "dancers drop out BY high school is pretty
>> clear, at least it was to me.
>
> Thank you again!

Yes you should thank Cheri. Too many here deliberately twist things to suit
their own nasty agendas. Cheri is always a fair minded and kind poster.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"JohnJohn" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:37:55 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:29:11 +1000, JohnJohn >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 20:26:18 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 2014-09-21 19:31, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Seems a lot of people here just want to make me out as a bad person no
>>>>> matter what I say!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Not at all Julie. We just think that you are a liar who embellishes the
>>>>truth and post compulsively in order to get attention.
>>>
>>>That's what makes you such a nice guy. You think she's a compulsive
>>>attention seeker and that's why you respond to everything she says.
>>
>>And who are you to pass judgment? Your history in this group doesnt
>>put you in a very good light either.
>
> Hey, I hit a nerve. I knew I had a good point.
>
>>Up until recent months, 99% of your posts consisted of nothing but
>>smart-arse comments in threads where you had no previous participation
>>and never anything about food and cooking.
>
> What you're really saying is that my track record has been improving
> in recent months. That's nice to hear.
>
>>All one has to do is look at your posts in the past 12 months to see
>>that is the case.
>
> But if we only look at "recent months", it's a different story, or so
> you say.
>
>>Makes you a hypocrite for pontificating.
>
> Pontificating... pontificating... I only said he was a nice guy for
> doing exactly what he thinks Julie wants. And so do you. Two great
> blokes

Kind hearted too ....


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

In article >, says...
>
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> > Some of the regs here are now on they home repair newsgroup telling people
> > not to help me because I am crazy. This is making me really angry.
>
> I'm not at all surprised, the people that follow you from group to group are
> definitely a "type" much like the Dementors in Harry Potter.
>
> Cheri

You lamebrain.

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...ir/JGjqTJv45AY

That's Julie's current performance in alt.home.repair
No wonder she got the responses she did.


Google's archive will one-click open the posting history IN THAT GROUP
of familiar rfc names posting there.

Showing that the rfc posters you try to smear, did not "follow her
there". They have longterm posting histories in that group

Janet UK

"dsi1" > wrote in message
...
> On Sunday, September 21, 2014 4:15:42 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote:
>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>>
>> > Of course not. You just quote it and send it back so that Julie, who
>>
>> > claims to have me KFed will see it. I have seen pictures of the kid and
>>
>> > they sure don't present the image of a kid who is keeping fit through
>>
>> > dance. Perhaps we need to be reminded that Julie has said that the
>>
>> > daughter was a dancer, and she also said that she was disabled.
>>
>>
>>
>> As I said, I've known Julie for years, since her daughter was a young
>> child
>>
>> and I think it's disgusting the way people talk about a young girl in
>> such a
>>
>> way. It says a lot about them at any rate. If you want to talk about her
>>
>> daughter, talk to someone else.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheri
>
> Let's face it, regular folks don't say nasty ass things about other
> people's kids - unless maybe the other people is Saddam Hussien. 😜

Or are so desperate to be the nastiest person around ... they think they are
being clever (


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Jeßus" > wrote in message
> news
>> On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 19:16:32 -0700, "Cheri" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
>>>> On 2014-09-21 1:53 PM, Pico Rico wrote:
>>>>> lessons.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In her daughter's case it was more likely that she gave up dance
>>>>>>> lessons
>>>>>>> when she had to stop for a snack while trying to squeeze into her
>>>>>>> tutu.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It was clear to me, and I don't comment on peoples children in a
>>>>>> nasty
>>>>>> way. I give her daughter props for sticking with it, it's great
>>>>>> excercise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheri
>>>>>
>>>>> don't tell me you are buying this madness.
>>>>
>>>> Cheri is one of Julie's greatest cheerleader/ enabler.
>>>
>>>And you're one of her greatest stalkers.
>>
>> What is it with RFC and 'stalking'?
>> What Dave is doing isn't stalking, it seems to have taken on a new
>> meaning here on RFC.
>
> And...me answering a post to Julie isn't enabling or cheerleading either,
> it's participation in a newsgroup but it's taken on a new meaning here on
> RFC, as so many things do, so stalker works for me. YMMV

Agreed! Have you noticed that if you respond to someone on their blacklist
you get bullied?

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 2014-09-22 1:11 PM, dsi1 wrote:

>>
>> It never occurred to me that it was a possibility. I think the
>> point is
>>
>> that a person cannot use this forum to vent about all the horrible
>>
>> things her husband and daughter do that frustrate her so much and
>> then
>>
>> complain that people express opinions about her daughter based on
>> what
>>
>> her own mother has repeatedly posted about her.
>
> If you're saying that you have no control over what others post, I's
> say that was absolutely true. What's alarming is people don't seem to
> have any control over what they post themselves.
>

That may be true. The reason I put here in my filter was twofold.... to
avoid her idiocy and to avoid the temptation to respond to the idiocy. I
confess that I would not be likely to look the other way if I saw train
about to crash, but I promised the group that I would not replay to or
post about Julie if they stopped. I kept my part of the bargain for a
while, but a couple people were obviously compelled to respond to her
every post and a others engaged her as if they thought she might be normal.

"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:37:55 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:29:11 +1000, JohnJohn >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 20:26:18 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 2014-09-21 19:31, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Seems a lot of people here just want to make me out as a bad person no
>>>>> matter what I say!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Not at all Julie. We just think that you are a liar who embellishes the
>>>>truth and post compulsively in order to get attention.
>>>
>>>That's what makes you such a nice guy. You think she's a compulsive
>>>attention seeker and that's why you respond to everything she says.
>>
>>And who are you to pass judgment? Your history in this group doesnt
>>put you in a very good light either.
>>Up until recent months, 99% of your posts consisted of nothing but
>>smart-arse comments in threads where you had no previous participation
>>and never anything about food and cooking.
>
> JohnJohn could easily be Jebus.

Not a hope in hell!!!

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Cheri" > wrote in message

>>> Well, in this case, I think "dancers drop out BY high school is pretty
>>> clear, at least it was to me.
>>
>> Thank you again!
>
> Yes you should thank Cheri. Too many here deliberately twist things to
> suit their own nasty agendas. Cheri is always a fair minded and kind
> poster.

Not always by any means, that would be you, but I really don't like
confrontation with posters so I try not to carry it on to the next day if
possible. Speaking of food, I'm making oven ribs today since it's a bit
cooler than it has been, also roasted carrots and celery and a small amount
of white rice for dh.

Cheri

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...

> Agreed! Have you noticed that if you respond to someone on their
> blacklist you get bullied?

Let's just say they *try*, water off a ducks back, and I notice it doesn't
work with you either. LOL

Cheri

On Monday, September 22, 2014 8:46:02 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> "dsi1" <> wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > On Sunday, September 21, 2014 4:15:42 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote:
>
> >> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>
> >>
>
> >> ...
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> > Of course not. You just quote it and send it back so that Julie, who
>
> >>
>
> >> > claims to have me KFed will see it. I have seen pictures of the kid and
>
> >>
>
> >> > they sure don't present the image of a kid who is keeping fit through
>
> >>
>
> >> > dance. Perhaps we need to be reminded that Julie has said that the
>
> >>
>
> >> > daughter was a dancer, and she also said that she was disabled.
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> As I said, I've known Julie for years, since her daughter was a young
>
> >> child
>
> >>
>
> >> and I think it's disgusting the way people talk about a young girl in
>
> >> such a
>
> >>
>
> >> way. It says a lot about them at any rate. If you want to talk about her
>
> >>
>
> >> daughter, talk to someone else.
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> Cheri
>
> >
>
> > Let's face it, regular folks don't say nasty ass things about other
>
> > people's kids - unless maybe the other people is Saddam Hussien. 😜
>
>
>
> Or are so desperate to be the nastiest person around ... they think they are
>
> being clever (
>
>

Maybe they're expecting a medal or some kind of award printed on fancy paper. Seems like a lot of bother to me. :-)

>
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>>
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Cheri" > wrote in message
>
>>>> Well, in this case, I think "dancers drop out BY high school is pretty
>>>> clear, at least it was to me.
>>>
>>> Thank you again!
>>
>> Yes you should thank Cheri. Too many here deliberately twist things to
>> suit their own nasty agendas. Cheri is always a fair minded and kind
>> poster.
>
> Not always by any means, that would be you, but I really don't like
> confrontation with posters so I try not to carry it on to the next day if
> possible.

Yes, but some folk don't allow it


Speaking of food, I'm making oven ribs today since it's a bit
> cooler than it has been, also roasted carrots and celery and a small
> amount of white rice for dh.

Today I made Lyonnaise potatoes served with leftover roasted pork loin in
onion gravy.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...

> That may be true. The reason I put here in my filter was twofold.... to
> avoid her idiocy and to avoid the temptation to respond to the idiocy. I
> confess that I would not be likely to look the other way if I saw train
> about to crash, but I promised the group that I would not replay to or
> post about Julie if they stopped. I kept my part of the bargain for a
> while, but a couple people were obviously compelled to respond to her
> every post and a others engaged her as if they thought she might be
> normal.

You don't get to decide your *bargain* for others, just for yourself, use
your impulse control.

Cheri

On Monday, September 22, 2014 8:51:18 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2014-09-22 1:11 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>
>
>
> >>
>
> >> It never occurred to me that it was a possibility. I think the
>
> >> point is
>
> >>
>
> >> that a person cannot use this forum to vent about all the horrible
>
> >>
>
> >> things her husband and daughter do that frustrate her so much and
>
> >> then
>
> >>
>
> >> complain that people express opinions about her daughter based on
>
> >> what
>
> >>
>
> >> her own mother has repeatedly posted about her.
>
> >
>
> > If you're saying that you have no control over what others post, I's
>
> > say that was absolutely true. What's alarming is people don't seem to
>
> > have any control over what they post themselves.
>
> >
>
>
>
> That may be true. The reason I put here in my filter was twofold.... to
>
> avoid her idiocy and to avoid the temptation to respond to the idiocy. I
>
> confess that I would not be likely to look the other way if I saw train
>
> about to crash, but I promised the group that I would not replay to or
>
> post about Julie if they stopped. I kept my part of the bargain for a
>
> while, but a couple people were obviously compelled to respond to her
>
> every post and a others engaged her as if they thought she might be normal.

This is the exact reason that one should never base their actions on the actions of other people. You can't ever rely on them to act like they're supposed to.

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...

> Today I made Lyonnaise potatoes served with leftover roasted pork loin in
> onion gravy.

Damn, that sounds good. I love roasted pork with onion gravy.

Cheri

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> Agreed! Have you noticed that if you respond to someone on their
>> blacklist you get bullied?
>
> Let's just say they *try*, water off a ducks back, and I notice it doesn't
> work with you either. LOL

Yers ;-)

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"dsi1" > wrote in message
...
> On Monday, September 22, 2014 8:46:02 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>> "dsi1" <> wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>>
>> > On Sunday, September 21, 2014 4:15:42 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote:
>>
>> >> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> ...
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> > Of course not. You just quote it and send it back so that Julie, who
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> > claims to have me KFed will see it. I have seen pictures of the kid
>> >> > and
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> > they sure don't present the image of a kid who is keeping fit
>> >> > through
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> > dance. Perhaps we need to be reminded that Julie has said that the
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> > daughter was a dancer, and she also said that she was disabled.
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> As I said, I've known Julie for years, since her daughter was a young
>>
>> >> child
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> and I think it's disgusting the way people talk about a young girl in
>>
>> >> such a
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> way. It says a lot about them at any rate. If you want to talk about
>> >> her
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> daughter, talk to someone else.
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> Cheri
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Let's face it, regular folks don't say nasty ass things about other
>>
>> > people's kids - unless maybe the other people is Saddam Hussien. 😜
>>
>>
>>
>> Or are so desperate to be the nastiest person around ... they think they
>> are
>>
>> being clever (
>>
>>
>
> Maybe they're expecting a medal or some kind of award printed on fancy
> paper. Seems like a lot of bother to me. :-)

Maybe they award themselves a medal?


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> That may be true. The reason I put here in my filter was twofold.... to
>> avoid her idiocy and to avoid the temptation to respond to the idiocy. I
>> confess that I would not be likely to look the other way if I saw train
>> about to crash, but I promised the group that I would not replay to or
>> post about Julie if they stopped. I kept my part of the bargain for a
>> while, but a couple people were obviously compelled to respond to her
>> every post and a others engaged her as if they thought she might be
>> normal.
>
> You don't get to decide your *bargain* for others, just for yourself, use
> your impulse control.

He wouldn't know how! He has tried to issue threats in the past but it
didn't work then either.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 2014-09-22 3:11 PM, Cheri wrote:
>
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> Agreed! Have you noticed that if you respond to someone on their
>> blacklist you get bullied?
>
> Let's just say they *try*, water off a ducks back, and I notice it
> doesn't work with you either. LOL

What Ophelia seemed to have a problem with was understanding that the
issue was the difficulty in KF a a person only to have her reply to
their every post and quoting the person in their entirety.

At one time I KFed Ophelia because she used to reply to Peter Lucas. He
was in my filter because he was an abusive idiot who went out of his way
to post offensive comments. I dealt with Lucas by filtering him. She,
OTOH, responded to every one of his posts, quoting the entire content of
his offensive post and then adding a line or two at the bottom to
complain about it being offensive. When I objected to her doing that
she told me I could not tell her who she could post to. Not a problem.
She went into the filter with him.

On 9/22/2014 7:52 AM, Dave Smith wrote:

>
> I used to work with a guy who was almost always late. It was usually
> only 10-15 minutes, but he was late almost always late. He almost always
> stayed an extra half hour or more. The boss never saw that. He saw only
> that lateness.
>

Happens frequently. Bosses often see an incompetent that never leave te
work station as being diligent, but the guy that takes an occasional
break is a slacker, even though he is doing twice the amount of work as
the first guy.

On 2014-09-22 3:14 PM, Cheri wrote:
>
> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> That may be true. The reason I put here in my filter was twofold....
>> to avoid her idiocy and to avoid the temptation to respond to the
>> idiocy. I confess that I would not be likely to look the other way if
>> I saw train about to crash, but I promised the group that I would not
>> replay to or post about Julie if they stopped. I kept my part of the
>> bargain for a while, but a couple people were obviously compelled to
>> respond to her every post and a others engaged her as if they thought
>> she might be normal.
>
> You don't get to decide your *bargain* for others, just for yourself,
> use your impulse control.


Not really. Some filters have been reactivated.
>

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> That may be true. The reason I put here in my filter was twofold.... to
>> avoid her idiocy and to avoid the temptation to respond to the idiocy. I
>> confess that I would not be likely to look the other way if I saw train
>> about to crash, but I promised the group that I would not replay to or
>> post about Julie if they stopped. I kept my part of the bargain for a
>> while, but a couple people were obviously compelled to respond to her
>> every post and a others engaged her as if they thought she might be
>> normal.
>
> You don't get to decide your *bargain* for others, just for yourself, use
> your impulse control.

He wouldn't know how! He has tried make bargains in the past, issuing
threats if they were not kept, but it didn't work then either.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> Today I made Lyonnaise potatoes served with leftover roasted pork loin in
>> onion gravy.
>
> Damn, that sounds good. I love roasted pork with onion gravy.

Well if I know you are coming ... <g>


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

Julie Bove wrote:
>
> Yes. My daughter is only taking dance classes this year. Ballet and tap.
> The tap is at a lower level but all of our advanced tappers have left the
> area. So it won't be a big deal if she misses a class of that. It's
> strictly for fun since she already knows the stuff.

Tap dancing is pretty cool and you don't see much of that on
entertainment shows anymore, sadly.

G.

Julie Bove wrote:
>
> Her school is big on everyone going to college and the students must take
> classes to prepare them for this. If they choose not to go to college, the
> student and the parents must write up an appeal and prove to the school
> valid reasons why they should not go.

That's pretty strange. Never heard of that before.

G.

Julie Bove wrote:
>
> But it has also been proven that the natural body clock of a teenager is to
> stay up late and sleep in.

That's a false study. The human body is very adaptable to any sleep
cycle. If you stay up late, naturally you want to sleep late. Go to
bed early and you can easily get up early. I've gotten up before dawn
all of my life.

I delivered newspapers when really young, then I got into surfing and
did that every day at dawn...even before going to school. I still do
it too. Teenagers don't need to sleep late if they go to bed early
enough.

G.

Cheryl wrote:
>
> When I was 16 my husband and me shared a car.

Really? You were married at 16? I was 25 before I got married.

G.

Pico Rico wrote:
>
> "Cheri" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "jmcquown" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> On 9/21/2014 5:10 PM, Cheri wrote:
> >>>
> >>> "Pico Rico" > wrote in message
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>>> Well, aren't YOU Mr. devil may care! You are the wild one, that's for
> >>>> sure! Maybe you should change your handle to Johnnie Dangerous or
> >>>> something.
> >>>>
> >>>> Just funning with you!
> >>>>
> >>>> Rather nice change from all the others who insist there is only one
> >>>> way (their way) to do anything. I just saw - get this - Lidia cooking
> >>>> braciole with parsley in the filling. Yes, SHE COOKED PARSLEY!!!
> >>>
> >>> The my way is the only/best way of cooking things is one of my pet
> >>> peeves.
> >>>
> >>> Cheri
> >>
> >> People who pay a lot of attention to TV chefs are one of my pet peeves.
> >>
> >>
> >> Jill
> >
> > TV chefs are one of my pet peeves. ;-)
> >
>
> pet peeves are my pet peeves.

I had a pet peeve once but it died early so I didn't get any more of
them. ;-o

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>> But it has also been proven that the natural body clock of a teenager is
>> to
>> stay up late and sleep in.
>
> That's a false study. The human body is very adaptable to any sleep
> cycle. If you stay up late, naturally you want to sleep late. Go to
> bed early and you can easily get up early. I've gotten up before dawn
> all of my life.
>
> I delivered newspapers when really young, then I got into surfing and
> did that every day at dawn...even before going to school. I still do
> it too. Teenagers don't need to sleep late if they go to bed early
> enough.
>

Yep. And if they start getting up early, they will find themselves going to
bed at a decent hour because they will be tired. A little bit of WORK in
the mix helps, too.