On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:49:48 -0400, Nancy Young
> wrote:

>On 9/22/2014 10:45 AM, Cheri wrote:
>>
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>> Some of the regs here are now on they home repair newsgroup telling
>>> people not to help me because I am crazy. This is making me really
>>> angry.
>>
>> I'm not at all surprised, the people that follow you from group to group
>> are definitely a "type" much like the Dementors in Harry Potter.
>
>Made me look.

Me too.

>The first comment saying they don't bother
>answering her any more is not someone from rfc.

And from I can see, some of the regulars here have been posting there
on or before Julie showed up there, with much greater participation
within threads.

Interesting to see much the same reaction and outcome to Julie on that
group as this one, with the one big exception that they have been
spared the volume of posts RFC gets from Julie.

I also see that Julie dragged out the raccoon stealing cat story
there...

On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:57:19 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2014-09-22 10:45 AM, Cheri wrote:
>>
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>> Some of the regs here are now on they home repair newsgroup telling
>>> people not to help me because I am crazy. This is making me really
>>> angry.
>>
>> I'm not at all surprised, the people that follow you from group to group
>> are definitely a "type" much like the Dementors in Harry Potter.
>
>Do they follow her from group to group, or does she just get the same
>reaction from normal people in different groups because of her bizarre
>posts, comments and lies?

A bit of both, from what I can see.

On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:22:33 +0100, Janet > wrote:

>In article >, says...
>>
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> > Some of the regs here are now on they home repair newsgroup telling people
>> > not to help me because I am crazy. This is making me really angry.
>>
>> I'm not at all surprised, the people that follow you from group to group are
>> definitely a "type" much like the Dementors in Harry Potter.
>>
>> Cheri
>
> You lamebrain.
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...ir/JGjqTJv45AY
>
> That's Julie's current performance in alt.home.repair
> No wonder she got the responses she did.
>
>
> Google's archive will one-click open the posting history IN THAT GROUP
>of familiar rfc names posting there.
>
> Showing that the rfc posters you try to smear, did not "follow her
>there". They have longterm posting histories in that group

Yep. I took me only a couple of minutes to come to that conclusion as
well.

On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:24:18 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2014-09-22 3:11 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>
>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>> Agreed! Have you noticed that if you respond to someone on their
>>> blacklist you get bullied?
>>
>> Let's just say they *try*, water off a ducks back, and I notice it
>> doesn't work with you either. LOL
>
>What Ophelia seemed to have a problem with was understanding that the
>issue was the difficulty in KF a a person only to have her reply to
>their every post and quoting the person in their entirety.
>
>At one time I KFed Ophelia because she used to reply to Peter Lucas.

Did you have to mention that name here... :\
He used to regularly do searches on RFC to see if his name was ever
mentioned, then he would show up here. Hopefully not any more.
He makes Julie look like a well adjusted and intelligent person.

>He
>was in my filter because he was an abusive idiot who went out of his way
>to post offensive comments. I dealt with Lucas by filtering him. She,
>OTOH, responded to every one of his posts, quoting the entire content of
>his offensive post and then adding a line or two at the bottom to
>complain about it being offensive. When I objected to her doing that
>she told me I could not tell her who she could post to. Not a problem.
>She went into the filter with him.

She seems to have double standards and poor judgment from what I have
seen. What one person can say or do here doesnt necessarily mean you
can, apparently.

On 9/22/2014 5:42 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:49:48 -0400, Nancy Young
> > wrote:
>
>> On 9/22/2014 10:45 AM, Cheri wrote:
>>>
>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> Some of the regs here are now on they home repair newsgroup telling
>>>> people not to help me because I am crazy. This is making me really
>>>> angry.
>>>
>>> I'm not at all surprised, the people that follow you from group to group
>>> are definitely a "type" much like the Dementors in Harry Potter.
>>
>> Made me look.
>
> Me too.
>
>> The first comment saying they don't bother
>> answering her any more is not someone from rfc.
>
> And from I can see, some of the regulars here have been posting there
> on or before Julie showed up there, with much greater participation
> within threads.

While I haven't lurked or participated in a while, I was a long
time follower of that group and I know there are many rfc regulars
there. They were there from before I ever noticed Julie, they
aren't following her there.

> Interesting to see much the same reaction and outcome to Julie on that
> group as this one,

I couldn't believe the one post I saw, it was spot on with the
same comments I see made here. Don't bother, she'll just say
it doesn't for for her blah blah blah.

> with the one big exception that they have been
> spared the volume of posts RFC gets from Julie.

> I also see that Julie dragged out the raccoon stealing cat story
> there...

(laugh) I can just picture how they reacted to that.

nancy

On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:11:03 -0400, Nancy Young
> wrote:

>On 9/22/2014 5:42 PM, Jeßus wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:49:48 -0400, Nancy Young
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/22/2014 10:45 AM, Cheri wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>> Some of the regs here are now on they home repair newsgroup telling
>>>>> people not to help me because I am crazy. This is making me really
>>>>> angry.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not at all surprised, the people that follow you from group to group
>>>> are definitely a "type" much like the Dementors in Harry Potter.
>>>
>>> Made me look.
>>
>> Me too.
>>
>>> The first comment saying they don't bother
>>> answering her any more is not someone from rfc.
>>
>> And from I can see, some of the regulars here have been posting there
>> on or before Julie showed up there, with much greater participation
>> within threads.
>
>While I haven't lurked or participated in a while, I was a long
>time follower of that group and I know there are many rfc regulars
>there. They were there from before I ever noticed Julie, they
>aren't following her there.
>
>> Interesting to see much the same reaction and outcome to Julie on that
>> group as this one,
>
>I couldn't believe the one post I saw, it was spot on with the
>same comments I see made here. Don't bother, she'll just say
>it doesn't for for her blah blah blah.

Yeah

One poster caught on real quick: "Hi,
Don't bother, save your time. She has a mental problem, enjoys playing
game with all of us here."

And another the garage door saga: "I agree, there does seem to be
a common theme here. She doesn't tell
us the make/model, won't call manufacturer's customer service help,
doesn't have the manual, gets things installed assuming they will put
in a Chamberlain because that's what was there before, etc."

> > with the one big exception that they have been
>> spared the volume of posts RFC gets from Julie.
>
>> I also see that Julie dragged out the raccoon stealing cat story
>> there...
>
>(laugh) I can just picture how they reacted to that.

At least she can be very entertaining in a new and strange kind of way

On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 22:18:20 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> And...me answering a post to Julie isn't enabling or cheerleading either,
>> it's participation in a newsgroup but it's taken on a new meaning here on
>> RFC, as so many things do, so stalker works for me. YMMV
>
>Some of the regs here are now on they home repair newsgroup telling people
>not to help me because I am crazy. This is making me really angry.

http://parkerdonat.files.wordpress.c...he_martian.jpg

On 9/22/2014 6:26 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:11:03 -0400, Nancy Young

>> I couldn't believe the one post I saw, it was spot on with the
>> same comments I see made here. Don't bother, she'll just say
>> it doesn't for for her blah blah blah.
>
> Yeah
>
> One poster caught on real quick: "Hi,
> Don't bother, save your time. She has a mental problem, enjoys playing
> game with all of us here."

I looked again ... another post not made by an rfc regular.

Yet the same reaction.

>>> I also see that Julie dragged out the raccoon stealing cat story
>>> there...
>>
>> (laugh) I can just picture how they reacted to that.
>
> At least she can be very entertaining in a new and strange kind of way
>

Heh. I guess. Sure do miss Buffy Lyar.

nancy

"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
...
> "Cheri" wrote:
>>"Dave Smith" wrote:
>>
>>> Of course not. You just quote it and send it back so that Julie, who
>>> claims to have me KFed will see it. I have seen pictures of the kid and
>>> they sure don't present the image of a kid who is keeping fit through
>>> dance. Perhaps we need to be reminded that Julie has said that the
>>> daughter was a dancer, and she also said that she was disabled.
>>
>>As I said, I've known Julie for years, since her daughter was a young
>>child
>>and I think it's disgusting the way people talk about a young girl in such
>>a
>>way. It says a lot about them at any rate. If you want to talk about her
>>daughter, talk to someone else.
>>
>>Cheri
>
> Actually Julie is quite immoral for constantly mentioning her daughter
> here, let alone highlighting every one of her daughter's personality
> traits like they are defects and on an hourly basis.

Oh you liar! I'm not even here on an hourly basis.

> Julie has made
> her daughter fair game to snipe at. Julie is the only one who treats
> her daughter in a disgusting and *abusive* manner... if you are truly
> her friend convince Julie to stop making her daughter a
> mockery/laughingstock. Julie's daughter is certianly not unattractive
> but definitely hasn't a typical dancer's body... albeit she could well
> be a belly dancer.
> http://angelabove.bandcamp.com/
> And I don't believe she's the spoiled brat Julie portrays her to be...
> and she doesn't look like a girl who doesn't enjoy food.... she's not
> obese or even fat, she's zoftig, pleasantly plump, I'd bet she has a
> good appetite. I'm sure Angela has no problem attracting boys... she
> could easily be a pin up girl from the '50s... I would've hung her
> picture in my locker. With those muscular legs Angela could crush a
> guy's head! heh
> Julie is a rotten mother for bashing her daughter in so public an
> arena.

And there is no excuse for you. I make a comment and others take it as
bashing. I do not bash my daughter. But I am sorely tempted to do a lot of
bashing here.

"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
...
> dsi1 > wrote:
>>Cheri wrote:
>>> "Dave Smith" wrote:
>>>
>>> > Of course not. You just quote it and send it back so that Julie, who
>>>
>>> > claims to have me KFed will see it. I have seen pictures of the kid
>>> > and
>>>
>>> > they sure don't present the image of a kid who is keeping fit through
>>>
>>> > dance. Perhaps we need to be reminded that Julie has said that the
>>>
>>> > daughter was a dancer, and she also said that she was disabled.
>>>
>>> As I said, I've known Julie for years, since her daughter was a young
>>> child
>>>
>>> and I think it's disgusting the way people talk about a young girl in
>>> such a
>>>
>>> way. It says a lot about them at any rate. If you want to talk about her
>>>
>>> daughter, talk to someone else.
>>>
>>> Cheri
>>
>>Let's face it, regular folks don't say nasty ass things about other
>>people's kids -
>
> Regular folks don't say nasty things about their own children.

And neither do I.

"dsi1" > wrote in message
...
On Monday, September 22, 2014 7:03:46 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2014-09-22 12:58 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >> Regular folks don't say nasty things about their own children.
>
> >
>
> > This is probably true. That don't mean that all ya'all ain't gonna
>
> > burn in hell. Ha ha ha. 😈
>
>
>
> It never occurred to me that it was a possibility. I think the point is
>
> that a person cannot use this forum to vent about all the horrible
>
> things her husband and daughter do that frustrate her so much and then
>
> complain that people express opinions about her daughter based on what
>
> her own mother has repeatedly posted about her.

If you're saying that you have no control over what others post, I's say
that was absolutely true. What's alarming is people don't seem to have any
control over what they post themselves.

Quite true.

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> That may be true. The reason I put here in my filter was twofold.... to
>> avoid her idiocy and to avoid the temptation to respond to the idiocy. I
>> confess that I would not be likely to look the other way if I saw train
>> about to crash, but I promised the group that I would not replay to or
>> post about Julie if they stopped. I kept my part of the bargain for a
>> while, but a couple people were obviously compelled to respond to her
>> every post and a others engaged her as if they thought she might be
>> normal.
>
> You don't get to decide your *bargain* for others, just for yourself, use
> your impulse control.

He seems to not have any.

"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:24:35 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 19:16:32 -0700, "Cheri" >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
>>>> On 2014-09-21 1:53 PM, Pico Rico wrote:
>>>>> lessons.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In her daughter's case it was more likely that she gave up dance
>>>>>>> lessons
>>>>>>> when she had to stop for a snack while trying to squeeze into her
>>>>>>> tutu.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It was clear to me, and I don't comment on peoples children in a
>>>>>> nasty
>>>>>> way. I give her daughter props for sticking with it, it's great
>>>>>> excercise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheri
>>>>>
>>>>> don't tell me you are buying this madness.
>>>>
>>>> Cheri is one of Julie's greatest cheerleader/ enabler.
>>>
>>>And you're one of her greatest stalkers.
>>
>>What is it with RFC and 'stalking'?
>>What Dave is doing isn't stalking, it seems to have taken on a new
>>meaning here on RFC.
>
> Yeah, Dave has morphed into Dr. Phil. LOL

Well, I'm not watching his show!

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> Some of the regs here are now on they home repair newsgroup telling
>> people not to help me because I am crazy. This is making me really
>> angry.
>
> I'm not at all surprised, the people that follow you from group to group
> are definitely a "type" much like the Dementors in Harry Potter.
>
> Cheri

I'll take your word for it. I don't know that plot.

"Nancy Young" > wrote in message
...
> On 9/22/2014 10:45 AM, Cheri wrote:
>>
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>> Some of the regs here are now on they home repair newsgroup telling
>>> people not to help me because I am crazy. This is making me really
>>> angry.
>>
>> I'm not at all surprised, the people that follow you from group to group
>> are definitely a "type" much like the Dementors in Harry Potter.
>
> Made me look. The first comment saying they don't bother
> answering her any more is not someone from rfc.
>
> nancy

It could well be as we have nym shifters. But Pico Rico and someone else
are in there.

"Nancy Young" > wrote in message
...
> On 9/22/2014 5:42 PM, Jeßus wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:49:48 -0400, Nancy Young
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/22/2014 10:45 AM, Cheri wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>> Some of the regs here are now on they home repair newsgroup telling
>>>>> people not to help me because I am crazy. This is making me really
>>>>> angry.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not at all surprised, the people that follow you from group to
>>>> group
>>>> are definitely a "type" much like the Dementors in Harry Potter.
>>>
>>> Made me look.
>>
>> Me too.
>>
>>> The first comment saying they don't bother
>>> answering her any more is not someone from rfc.
>>
>> And from I can see, some of the regulars here have been posting there
>> on or before Julie showed up there, with much greater participation
>> within threads.
>
> While I haven't lurked or participated in a while, I was a long
> time follower of that group and I know there are many rfc regulars
> there. They were there from before I ever noticed Julie, they
> aren't following her there.
>
>> Interesting to see much the same reaction and outcome to Julie on that
>> group as this one,
>
> I couldn't believe the one post I saw, it was spot on with the
> same comments I see made here. Don't bother, she'll just say
> it doesn't for for her blah blah blah.
>
> > with the one big exception that they have been
>> spared the volume of posts RFC gets from Julie.
>
>> I also see that Julie dragged out the raccoon stealing cat story
>> there...
>
> (laugh) I can just picture how they reacted to that.

You apparently did not look at what I was complaining about.

"Nancy Young" > wrote in message
...
> On 9/22/2014 6:26 PM, Jeßus wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:11:03 -0400, Nancy Young
>
>>> I couldn't believe the one post I saw, it was spot on with the
>>> same comments I see made here. Don't bother, she'll just say
>>> it doesn't for for her blah blah blah.
>>
>> Yeah
>>
>> One poster caught on real quick: "Hi,
>> Don't bother, save your time. She has a mental problem, enjoys playing
>> game with all of us here."
>
> I looked again ... another post not made by an rfc regular.
>
> Yet the same reaction.
>
>>>> I also see that Julie dragged out the raccoon stealing cat story
>>>> there...
>>>
>>> (laugh) I can just picture how they reacted to that.
>>
>> At least she can be very entertaining in a new and strange kind of way
>>
>
> Heh. I guess. Sure do miss Buffy Lyar.
>
> nancy

No clue what that means.

"Janet" > wrote in message
t...
> In article >, says...
>>
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> > Some of the regs here are now on they home repair newsgroup telling
>> > people
>> > not to help me because I am crazy. This is making me really angry.
>>
>> I'm not at all surprised, the people that follow you from group to group
>> are
>> definitely a "type" much like the Dementors in Harry Potter.
>>
>> Cheri
>
> You lamebrain.
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...ir/JGjqTJv45AY
>
> That's Julie's current performance in alt.home.repair
> No wonder she got the responses she did.
>
>
> Google's archive will one-click open the posting history IN THAT GROUP
> of familiar rfc names posting there.
>
> Showing that the rfc posters you try to smear, did not "follow her
> there". They have longterm posting histories in that group
>
> Janet UK

I don't know the history of that group. I don't care. I won't go there
again. Fact is, they are bringing up *this* group over there. And who did
I try to smear? No one.

"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
...
>
>>"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> "Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Jeßus wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pre-cooked bacon?? Does that actually exist?
>>>>>
>>>>> Prefried bacon has existed for at least 50 years that I know of,
>>>>> developed by the US Navy for saving reefer space aboard ship... it's
>>>>> canned, requires no refrigeration, and has a shelf life of some 15
>>>>> years... refered to as Petrified Bacon. All that's required is to
>>>>> open the can at both ends, push out bacon (it's rolled with parchment
>>>>> paper between layers), and heat on griddle, in oven, or deep fryer to
>>>>> desired degree of doneness (it's precooked to just before crisp, with
>>>>> much of the rendered fat removed)... happens to be excellent bacon.
>>>>> The can is about 1 liter sized and contains the equivalent of 5 lbs
>>>>> raw bacon. There are commercial brands now, I've not tried any.
>>>>
>>>> This isn't canned. I know that this kind has existed for at least 10
>>>> years. First time I bought some was in PA. I get it at Costco. There
>>>> is
>>>> far too much in the package for us to finish before it goes bad so I
>>>> portion it out and freeze it.
>
> Probably requires refrigeration.
>
> Canned can sit in your pantry.
> http://www.amazon.com/Cans-full-Yode.../dp/B0039LDMV6
> Hmm:
> http://www.amazon.com/Mountain-House...ze+dried+bacon

Some of it is shelf stable. Most is not. What I buy is not. I used to buy
canned bacon years ago. It was cheap but not cooked.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 08:13:38 +0000 (UTC), jinx the minx wrote:
>
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote:
>>> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>>
>>>> Previously you stated that this was a "near stress fracture". So was
>>>> it a
>>>> stress fracture or not?
>>>
>>> *sigh*
>>>
>>> And then after that when she had the loose vertebrae, I took her back to
>>> the physical therapist after first taking her to the walk in clinic.
>>> They did an X Ray and told me that while the Orthopedic guy had told us
>>> it was a near stress fracture, at some point, it did go into a full on
>>> stress fracture and they showed me where it had healed, on the X Ray.
>>>
>>> What is with you people? Do you sit around trying to remember every
>>> single thing that I ever said? If so, you are failing.
>>
>> You people?? What is with *you*?! You tell the same damn sad sack
>> stories
>> over and over again ad nauseam. Each and every time the details change
>> ever so slightly. It isn't hard to remember them at all they're so
>> ludicrous.
>>
>> *sigh*!!
>
> She's just mad because she can't remember all of her lies. It will
> only worse form here on out as she rehashes the same old stories,
> embellishing them more and more each time she tells them.
>
> I got tired of pointing out all of her inconsistencies so I rarely
> ever mention them any more.

There are no lies.

"jinx the minx" > wrote in message
...
> "Julie Bove" > wrote:
>> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote:
>>>> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote:
>>>>>> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Jeßus > wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:05:06 -0400, jmcquown
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mmmm, but eggs are nice.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I scrambled a couple in butter and had them with buttered wheat
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> toast.
>>>>>>>>> I didn't break out in any rashes, either.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm nearly drowning in eggs at the moment and need a break from
>>>>>>>> them,
>>>>>>>> had eggs for breakfast 3 mornings in a row, I think just tomato
>>>>>>>> onion
>>>>>>>> and cheese on toast for me this morning.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I thought about cooking some
>>>>>>>>> (streaky) bacon but darn, that would have been too difficult.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cooking bacon yourself? Who the hell does that any more??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I did, just this morning. Yum!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have never bought cooked bacon! DH loves bacon, eggs and mushrooms
>>>>>> with toast for breakfast and I am happy to cook it for him
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thinking about it, I don't think I have ever seen ready cooked bacon
>>>>>> >> >>>> rashers ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I cook my bacon in the oven--easy peasy. Pre-cooked is passable in a
>>>>> > >>> pinch
>>>>> if it's going into something, like crumbled in a salad or on a baked
>>>>> potato, but I would never, ever consider heating it up and eating it
>>>>> on >>> > its
>>>>> own. Ick.
>>>>
>>>> Why? It's very good.
>>>
>>> Perhaps your neuropathy has affected your taste buds.
>>
>> Nope. I don't know what kind you buy. I buy Hormel. Doesn't taste any
>> different than what the raw Hormel would taste like if I cooked it.
>
> I'm picky about the meat to fat ratio on my bacon. I don't find the
> precooked kind to be especially meaty, and as Hormel is local company,
> it's
> the standard brand here. Like I said, I find it to be okay crumbled in
> something, but I would not consider serving it as is. I prefer to feed my
> family fresh food I've cooked myself in my own kitchen. You prefer to
> feed
> your family food that's been cooked in a factory, frozen, shipped, and
> reheated in a microwave. No thanks.

I prefer it because we all like it. The bacon is very lean. I like lean.
Not fatty. I also dislike the grease and the stink of cooking bacon. I
don't think this stuff has ever been frozen.

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 22:19:18 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> "Cheryl" > wrote in message
>> web.com...
>> > On 9/20/2014 9:57 AM, Gary wrote:
>> >
>> >> Chemo wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Here's an idea.........teach her or just tell her to make her own
>> >>> breakfast. If she can drive a car she can cook.
>> >>
>> >> I can't believe they bought her a car as soon as she turned 16 and got
>> >> her driver's license. How many people here had that perk? Certainly
>> >> not me.
>> >>
>> >> G.
>> >>
>> > When I was 16 my husband and me shared a car.
>>
>> I didn't get my first car until I was 19. I had to share one with my mom
>> prior.
>
> Poor you. I didn't get a car of my own until after I was married and
> we're back down to one again.

Poor me? What is that supposed to mean?

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Poor you. I didn't get a car of my own until after I was married and
>> we're back down to one again.
>
> Same here, and didn't get a new car until in my 40's.

I got my first one one this year. The new one was cheaper than anything I
could find used. Anything that I would consider anyway.

"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
...

> I don't know the history of that group. I don't care. I won't go there
> again. Fact is, they are bringing up *this* group over there. And who
> did I try to smear? No one.

I used to post in that group years ago and always found them to be very
helpful with what I needed to know. My washing machine came with a missing
part and they got me to who I needed to speak to with GE and I got the part
sent to me right away, also plumbing problems solved, and grout problems
solved. The only people you don't really want to ask questions to are the
HVAC people. LOL

Cheri

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Cheri" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Pico Rico" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> "Cheri" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> On 9/21/2014 9:10 AM, Gary wrote:
>>>>>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes. The schedule is insane! Now I know why so many dancers drop
>>>>>>>>> out by
>>>>>>>>> high school. They just haven't got enough time what with the ever
>>>>>>>>> increasing homework load.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Those dancers are mostly dancer-wannbees and will never get a
>>>>>>>> career
>>>>>>>> in it. One would think that responsible parents would make sure
>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>> dropped out of the stupid dance classes rather than drop out of
>>>>>>>> high
>>>>>>>> school. This can't be for real.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry. After I posted that I realized that you probably meant that
>>>>>>> they dropped out of dance class, not HS. That's a good choice,
>>>>>>> imwo.
>>>>>>> :-D
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, you didn't get it wrong. She said they drop out of High School.
>>>>>> Because of the homework.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nah, she didn't say that. She said they drop out of dance *by* high
>>>>> school because there is so much homework in high school.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Actually, as usual, we don't know what she said. " . . . rather than
>>>> drop out of high school." So, apparently she is wishing that the
>>>> parents would be more responsible and have them drop dancing rather
>>>> than HS. But it is all a bunch of goof with her anyway.
>>>
>>> Well, in this case, I think "dancers drop out BY high school is pretty
>>> clear, at least it was to me.
>>
>> Thank you again!
>
> Yes you should thank Cheri. Too many here deliberately twist things to
> suit their own nasty agendas. Cheri is always a fair minded and kind
> poster.

I am just getting sick of this all. I come here to talk about food and that
rarely seems to happen. Just attacks on me or my family.

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>> Yes. My daughter is only taking dance classes this year. Ballet and
>> tap.
>> The tap is at a lower level but all of our advanced tappers have left the
>> area. So it won't be a big deal if she misses a class of that. It's
>> strictly for fun since she already knows the stuff.
>
> Tap dancing is pretty cool and you don't see much of that on
> entertainment shows anymore, sadly.

No. It seems to be going the way of the wind.

On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:35:13 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

> And there is no excuse for you. I make a comment and others take it as
> bashing. I do not bash my daughter. But I am sorely tempted to do a lot of
> bashing here.

No, you don't bash. You report and others grab the opportunity to
bash.

Maybe it's my bad that I don't track you in every ng you've ever
posted in and don't Google your posts on any given subject, so I need
to ask: Is that really your DD or some person on another web site?
If that's really your DD, she's very mature looking to me. I got the
impression she was around 17 at this point.

--

Never trust a dog to watch your food.

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>> But it has also been proven that the natural body clock of a teenager is
>> to
>> stay up late and sleep in.
>
> That's a false study. The human body is very adaptable to any sleep
> cycle. If you stay up late, naturally you want to sleep late. Go to
> bed early and you can easily get up early. I've gotten up before dawn
> all of my life.

No, it really isn't. I was born a night owl and I'll always be one. The
people who say that you can reset your body clock are clearly not like me.
>
> I delivered newspapers when really young, then I got into surfing and
> did that every day at dawn...even before going to school. I still do
> it too. Teenagers don't need to sleep late if they go to bed early
> enough.

Well, I'm sure that wouldn't apply to all teenagers. I wouldn't get up at
dawn to do anything unless I had to go to work then. But stay up till dawn?
Yep.

"Pico Rico" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Gary" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Julie Bove wrote:
>>>
>>> But it has also been proven that the natural body clock of a teenager is
>>> to
>>> stay up late and sleep in.
>>
>> That's a false study. The human body is very adaptable to any sleep
>> cycle. If you stay up late, naturally you want to sleep late. Go to
>> bed early and you can easily get up early. I've gotten up before dawn
>> all of my life.
>>
>> I delivered newspapers when really young, then I got into surfing and
>> did that every day at dawn...even before going to school. I still do
>> it too. Teenagers don't need to sleep late if they go to bed early
>> enough.
>>
>
> Yep. And if they start getting up early, they will find themselves going
> to bed at a decent hour because they will be tired. A little bit of WORK
> in the mix helps, too.

Wrong.

On Monday, September 22, 2014 3:55:10 PM UTC-5, Gary wrote:
>
> Julie Bove wrote:
>
> > Her school is big on everyone going to college and the students must take
> > classes to prepare them for this. If they choose not to go to college, the
> > student and the parents must write up an appeal and prove to the school
> > valid reasons why they should not go.
>
>
> That's pretty strange. Never heard of that before.
>
> G.
>
>
Another one of Julie's wild and outlandish tales.

So what if the parents don't 'write up an appeal'? Are they going to physically take the kid and make him attend college or will they just behead the kid and his parents??

On Monday, September 22, 2014 8:35:13 PM UTC-5, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> I make a comment and others take it as
> bashing. I do not bash my daughter. But I am sorely tempted to do a lot of
> bashing here.
>
>
You talk about your daughter incessantly like she was a disgusting dog that is why people comment about you and her. Quit the bashing and we'll quit talking about her.

On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:50:14 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
>"Janet" > wrote in message
et...
>> In article >, says...
>>>
>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>> > Some of the regs here are now on they home repair newsgroup telling
>>> > people
>>> > not to help me because I am crazy. This is making me really angry.
>>>
>>> I'm not at all surprised, the people that follow you from group to group
>>> are
>>> definitely a "type" much like the Dementors in Harry Potter.
>>
>> You lamebrain.
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...ir/JGjqTJv45AY
>>
>> That's Julie's current performance in alt.home.repair
>> No wonder she got the responses she did.
>>
>> Google's archive will one-click open the posting history IN THAT GROUP
>> of familiar rfc names posting there.
>>
>> Showing that the rfc posters you try to smear, did not "follow her
>> there". They have longterm posting histories in that group
>
>I don't know the history of that group. I don't care. I won't go there
>again. Fact is, they are bringing up *this* group over there. And who did
>I try to smear? No one.

Of course you 'don't care'. You just got proven wrong again.

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> I don't know the history of that group. I don't care. I won't go there
>> again. Fact is, they are bringing up *this* group over there. And who
>> did I try to smear? No one.
>
> I used to post in that group years ago and always found them to be very
> helpful with what I needed to know. My washing machine came with a missing
> part and they got me to who I needed to speak to with GE and I got the
> part sent to me right away, also plumbing problems solved, and grout
> problems solved. The only people you don't really want to ask questions to
> are the HVAC people. LOL
>
> Cheri

Yep, and some good natured kidding around, but not the ad nauseum go for the
jugular we do here. Why do we do that here, again?

On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:47:45 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

> No helpful responses there. They just keep asking me for a model
> number. I fail to see why that would be necessary and even when I did give
> it, they still gave no help.

Model numbers do help. Door openers don't change names the way cell
phones do.


--

Never trust a dog to watch your food.

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:47:45 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>> No helpful responses there. They just keep asking me for a model
>> number. I fail to see why that would be necessary and even when I did
>> give
>> it, they still gave no help.
>
> Model numbers do help. Door openers don't change names the way cell
> phones do.

This wasn't for the opener but the wireless keypad. And there's only the
one kind/

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> I don't know the history of that group. I don't care. I won't go there
>> again. Fact is, they are bringing up *this* group over there. And who
>> did I try to smear? No one.
>
> I used to post in that group years ago and always found them to be very
> helpful with what I needed to know. My washing machine came with a missing
> part and they got me to who I needed to speak to with GE and I got the
> part sent to me right away, also plumbing problems solved, and grout
> problems solved. The only people you don't really want to ask questions to
> are the HVAC people. LOL

Well, I'm glad they were helpful for you. I think the problem is that the
problem I recently had was just plain weird and defies any sort of
explanation.

"Pico Rico" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Cheri" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>> I don't know the history of that group. I don't care. I won't go there
>>> again. Fact is, they are bringing up *this* group over there. And who
>>> did I try to smear? No one.
>>
>> I used to post in that group years ago and always found them to be very
>> helpful with what I needed to know. My washing machine came with a
>> missing
>> part and they got me to who I needed to speak to with GE and I got the
>> part sent to me right away, also plumbing problems solved, and grout
>> problems solved. The only people you don't really want to ask questions
>> to
>> are the HVAC people. LOL
>>
>> Cheri
>
> Yep, and some good natured kidding around, but not the ad nauseum go for
> the
> jugular we do here. Why do we do that here, again?

I honestly don't know.

Cheri

"JohnJohn" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:16:02 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:50:14 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Janet" > wrote in message
.net...
>>>> In article >, says...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> > Some of the regs here are now on they home repair newsgroup telling
>>>>> > people
>>>>> > not to help me because I am crazy. This is making me really angry.
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not at all surprised, the people that follow you from group to
>>>>> group
>>>>> are
>>>>> definitely a "type" much like the Dementors in Harry Potter.
>>>>
>>>> You lamebrain.
>>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...ir/JGjqTJv45AY
>>>>
>>>> That's Julie's current performance in alt.home.repair
>>>> No wonder she got the responses she did.
>>>>
>>>> Google's archive will one-click open the posting history IN THAT GROUP
>>>> of familiar rfc names posting there.
>>>>
>>>> Showing that the rfc posters you try to smear, did not "follow her
>>>> there". They have longterm posting histories in that group
>>>
>>>I don't know the history of that group. I don't care. I won't go there
>>>again. Fact is, they are bringing up *this* group over there. And who
>>>did
>>>I try to smear? No one.
>>
>>Of course you 'don't care'. You just got proven wrong again.
>
> http://www.cyberbullying.org/

What? I didn't bully anyone.

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:35:13 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>> And there is no excuse for you. I make a comment and others take it as
>> bashing. I do not bash my daughter. But I am sorely tempted to do a lot
>> of
>> bashing here.
>
> No, you don't bash. You report and others grab the opportunity to
> bash.
>
> Maybe it's my bad that I don't track you in every ng you've ever
> posted in and don't Google your posts on any given subject, so I need
> to ask: Is that really your DD or some person on another web site?
> If that's really your DD, she's very mature looking to me. I got the
> impression she was around 17 at this point.

Is *who* really my daughter? I don't know what you are talking about. She
is 16. And I certainly wouldn't expect anyone to track all of my posts.
Those who are doing that are just plain sick in some way shape or form.

> wrote in message
...
> On Monday, September 22, 2014 3:55:10 PM UTC-5, Gary wrote:
>>
>> Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>> > Her school is big on everyone going to college and the students must
>> > take
>> > classes to prepare them for this. If they choose not to go to college,
>> > the
>> > student and the parents must write up an appeal and prove to the school
>> > valid reasons why they should not go.
>>
>>
>> That's pretty strange. Never heard of that before.
>>
>> G.
>>
>>
> Another one of Julie's wild and outlandish tales.
>
> So what if the parents don't 'write up an appeal'? Are they going to
> physically take the kid and make him attend college or will they just
> behead the kid and his parents??

Hardly. Don't believe me? I'll prove it!

Graduation requirements:

http://wwwnew.nsd.org/cms/lib08/WA01...016-Beyond.pdf

Note the part on the high school and beyond plan.

http://wwwnew.nsd.org/Page/719

Although it doesn't spell it out in words, you'll understand, what this
means is that if they choose not to take AP courses, then they must spell
this out in their high school and beyond plan.

Ta da!

Why don't you just go cook something? Try peeling a squash or something