Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
Salut/Hi TB,
le/on 24 Jan 2005 02:54:40 -0800, tu disais/you said:- >. Browsing in a wine-shop (looking for reasonably-priced Meursaults. >Actually, what is the opening level for Meursault-price one would >expect in France or Germany? It all depends upon the level. A village level wine from a decent producer should be found at around the ‚¬15-20 mark. A 1st growth vineyard from a very good producer? ‚¬35 or so - well I just bought ther superb 2002 vintage Meursault-Genevrières from Mikulski at ‚¬32 a bottle - but I was lucky, as he'd sold out. >further said that he has no idea how well or badly were the wines kept, >but one could look at sediments or wine-levels or labels and basically >try one's luck. As always.. (sorry to go on about it) it all depends upon the year and the grower. -- All the Best Ian Hoare http://www.souvigne.com mailbox full to avoid spam. try me at website |
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting experience with an old wine
Hi folks,
I had a very interesting experience with an old wine last weekend which I would like to share and put forth some questions that I had in the regard hoping for your feedback. .. Browsing in a wine-shop (looking for reasonably-priced Meursaults. Actually, what is the opening level for Meursault-price one would expect in France or Germany? Is it more like 15 Euros per bottle or 30?), we saw some mixed cases of rather old wines. The shopkeeper told us that these are wines found in the cellar of a recently-deceased person by the next-of-kin, who - not having any interest in wines and looking to make maybe a thousand Euros or so - are selling them. He further said that he has no idea how well or badly were the wines kept, but one could look at sediments or wine-levels or labels and basically try one's luck. He had a 195x Rioja which was marked for 55 Euros but we passed that. One bottle that we did buy said: 1971 Vino BARBARESCO ITALIEN VINO A DENOMINATIONE D'ORIGINE CONTROLLATA IMBOTTIGLIATO DALLA Casa Vinicola ABBAZIA S. GAUDENZIO dei F.lli Santero S=2E Stefano Belbo (CN) R=2EI 90/CN CONT. LT. 0.720 ALCOOL GR.13 There was no sediment in the bottle, the wine level was quite high, the cork sat fairly tight, so we did pay the 14 Euros one asked for it and opened it immediately upon reaching home. We poured out two glass immediately from the bottle and put the rest in a decanter. First comments about the cork. It was a rather long cork (Modelo is the word?) and said F.LLI SANTERO as well as S. STEFANO B. on the cork. It had red-brown streaks on the bottom third of its body and was quite tight in the bottle. The latter two points did indicate that the bottle was reasonably well-kept. Our notes: - Lucid, pale, a touch watery with the classical browning of Spanna - Complex nose with licorice, leather, anise, dried flowers. Very fresh, indicating acidity. - Soft tannins, quite fresh on the palate due to the acidity - A touche disappearing but robust taste of licorice, anise, cinammon, a touch of leather. - A rather light body for a Barbaresco with a mildly shrinking-in-mouth astringency - The taste had frankly a quick finish but it lingered on the breath for long (not just the alcohol, also the complex extracts) The second and third pours from the bottle showed a very thin white-ish slick-like layer on top of the wine which disappeared after a few minutes. All in all, we felt quite happy with the experiment and wish the seller had more bottles of this wine. Some questions that I have though: 1=2E It was a DOC, not a DOCG. I thought Barbaresco was an "original" DOCG since 1963. Am I mistaked or is it possible to get DOC Barbaresco also (i.e. without the Garantia)? 2=2E The fresh acid was quite surprising. Now it was very pleasant and not puckering, it also balanced the complex nose and mouth well. But it was really much more "forward leaning" (higher acidity, a touch shrinking-in-mouth, shorter-finish,) than the average 199x Nebbiolo-based wines that I have tasted. Was it simply age or are Barbarescos often like this? 3=2E The bottle itself was asymmetric and looked almost hand-made. It had 0=2E72 litres of wine, though the bottle itself was marked 0.75 on the back. Was it common to bottle 0.72 l? 4=2E The label said "ITALIEN" and not "ITALIA". This must mean that it was meant to be sold in Germany, I suppose. 5=2E The bottle was C=F4tes du Rh=F4ne-shaped with a shield-shaped label. Is/ was that common? I thought Barbarescos are usually bottled in Bordeaux-shaped bottles with rectangular labels. Cheers |
|
|||
|
|||
"TB" > wrote:
> 1. It was a DOC, not a DOCG. I thought Barbaresco was an > "original" DOCG since 1963. Am I mistaked Yes. > or is it possible to get DOC Barbaresco also (i.e. without the > Garantia)? Now: no. Back then: yes. The first DOCG decree - for Brunello - was signed by the President of the Italian Republic on July 1, 1980, and published in the Gazetto Ufficiale on November 15, 1980. The relevant dates for the next DOCGs: 1980-07-01 / 1981-01-22 Barolo 1980-07-01 / not available* Vino Nobile di Montepulciano 1980-10-03 / 1981-09-03 Barbaresco *) because of subsequent supersedes that only refer to the "D.P.R." dates, the "Decreto del Presidente della Republica". M. |
|
|||
|
|||
"TB" > wrote:
> 3. The bottle itself was asymmetric and looked almost hand-made. > It had 0.72 litres of wine, though the bottle itself was marked > 0.75 on the back. Was it common to bottle 0.72 l? Yes. > 4. The label said "ITALIEN" and not "ITALIA". This must mean > that it was meant to be sold in Germany, I suppose. Very probably. > 5. The bottle was Côtes du Rhône-shaped with a shield-shaped > label. Is/ was that common? Yes. > I thought Barbarescos are usually bottled in Bordeaux-shaped > bottles with rectangular labels. The "Albeisa" bottle shape - a kind of slightly slimmer burgundy type - is quite traditional in the Piemonte. One large house using Burgundy shaped bottles is Fontanafredda: <http://pensiero.hp.infoseek.co.jp/image/vino293.jpg> As to the label form, this is entirely up to the producer. Take a look at Bordeaux: you can have tetragons (rectangles), trapezoids (old Gruaud & Talbot; Haut Brion) and even octogons (Beychevelle, Margaux). And in Champagne you can have just about everything, from neck labels (Gosset) to coat-of-arms shields (Dom Pérignon). M. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
An interesting dining experience | Wine | |||
an interesting experience | General Cooking | |||
an interesting experience | General Cooking | |||
an interesting experience | General Cooking | |||
an interesting experience | General Cooking |