Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to alt.food.wine
|
|||
|
|||
Two Brouilly compared
Hello all
Last week I compared a 2003 DuBoeuf Brouilly to a 2004 Chateau le Chaize Brouilly. Overall, I found the 2003 to have a lot more intensity, a little complexity, and slightly more tannin. To me it was good. It's been on my 'buy again' list for some time now. What I don't understand is the 2004 Chateau le Chaize received decent reviews, though it seemed to be unpleasantly light. Watery, little flavor. Nose was slight. Are either of these wines considered standard for a Brouilly, or are they both just 'different'? In all fairness I know 2004 wasn't an excellent vintage, though the reviews on the le Chaize indicated it was supposed to be good. I was pleasantly surprised by the 2004, Joseph Drouhin Laforet Bourgogne. For around $12 it was almost as good as burgundies I've had at four times the price. -ben |
Posted to alt.food.wine
|
|||
|
|||
Two Brouilly compared
Ben,
first the disclaimer that I've tasted neither wine. But a few thoughts on Beaujolais: 1) I have friends who are friends with the owner (countess?) of the Ch. de la Chaize. So I've had quite a few. But I can't say that any have moved me. Usually competent, never exciting. 2) I'm personally no DuBouef fan either, but understand that a lot of people really liked their 2003s. 3) One must remember there's no right or wrong as to personal preferences. Most of the 2003 Beaujolais I tried didn't really appeal to me. Sure, big ripe fruit for a Beaujolais. But *for my tastes* (important to realize taste is NOT universal) maybe a little low acid, and in the ripeness of the very hot vintage a lot of the personality of the appelations, and even of Gamay, was lost - for my tastes. This speaks to typicity, something some wine drinkers value, and others don't (and I have wine friends in both camps). 4) 2004 is not the vintage that 2002 was. But for my tastes the better wines are better than the 2003s. I'd encourage you (if available in your market) to try 2004s from Clos de la Roilette, JP Brun, Diochon, Thevenet, Tete, etc. One of the great things about Beaujolais is that Cru Beaujolais from the top artisanal producers are generally just a couple bucks more than the mass market wines, and virtually all under $20. 5) I'll look for the Drouhin '04. It's often a good deal. Thanks for posting. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Turducken is NOTHING compared to this! | General Cooking | |||
[TN] '05 Descombes Brouilly | Wine | |||
[TN] '05 Brun Cote de Brouilly | Wine | |||
TN: Brun Brouilly and Cline Zin | Wine | |||
TN: Small Carnival Gathering (Brouilly, Aligoté, NZ Riesling, CdR) | Wine |