On 11/13/2012 1:52 PM, dh@. wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:13:01 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:41:22 -0500, the following appeared
>> in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>
>>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:49:32 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:59:53 -0400, the following appeared
>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:26:24 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:42:55 -0400, the following appeared
>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>> I challenge you to try to help the Goober and/or "Bob" and/or yourself try
>>>>>>> to explain what you think is preventing you from benefitting from your life. Go:
>>>>
>>>>>> Already been done, multiple times. And just as above, you
>>>>>> snipped the explanation and pretended it didn't exist.
>>>>>> You're an idiot.
>>>>
>>>>> Try presenting an example if you think you're aware of one.
>>>>
>>>> No examples exist of "benefitting solely from life", which
>>>> is the point. Try to keep up, even if you are an idiot.
>>
>>> LOL!!! You proved yourself a liar then.
>>
>> You really do have a problem with logic and clear thought,
>> don't you? And also with honesty, considering that you tried
>> to change how my reply would be read by snipping everything
>> past "No examples exist". So you're not just an idiot,
>> you're a lying idiot.
>
> I was hoping you could

He's right about you, Goo: you're a lying idiot.

On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:50:34 -0800, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by George Plimpton >:

>On 11/13/2012 1:52 PM, dh@. wrote:
>> On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:13:01 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:41:22 -0500, the following appeared
>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:49:32 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:59:53 -0400, the following appeared
>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:26:24 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:42:55 -0400, the following appeared
>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I challenge you to try to help the Goober and/or "Bob" and/or yourself try
>>>>>>>> to explain what you think is preventing you from benefitting from your life. Go:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Already been done, multiple times. And just as above, you
>>>>>>> snipped the explanation and pretended it didn't exist.
>>>>>>> You're an idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Try presenting an example if you think you're aware of one.
>>>>>
>>>>> No examples exist of "benefitting solely from life", which
>>>>> is the point. Try to keep up, even if you are an idiot.
>>>
>>>> LOL!!! You proved yourself a liar then.
>>>
>>> You really do have a problem with logic and clear thought,
>>> don't you? And also with honesty, considering that you tried
>>> to change how my reply would be read by snipping everything
>>> past "No examples exist". So you're not just an idiot,
>>> you're a lying idiot.
>>
>> I was hoping you could
>
>He's right about you, Goo: you're a lying idiot.

I've abandoned the effort to educate him in this thread.
Maybe I'll rejoin for his next idiocy; hope springs
eternal....
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."

- McNameless

On 11/15/2012 9:39 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:50:34 -0800, the following appeared
> in sci.skeptic, posted by George Plimpton >:
>
>> On 11/13/2012 1:52 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>> On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:13:01 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:41:22 -0500, the following appeared
>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:49:32 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:59:53 -0400, the following appeared
>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:26:24 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:42:55 -0400, the following appeared
>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I challenge you to try to help the Goober and/or "Bob" and/or yourself try
>>>>>>>>> to explain what you think is preventing you from benefitting from your life. Go:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Already been done, multiple times. And just as above, you
>>>>>>>> snipped the explanation and pretended it didn't exist.
>>>>>>>> You're an idiot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Try presenting an example if you think you're aware of one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No examples exist of "benefitting solely from life", which
>>>>>> is the point. Try to keep up, even if you are an idiot.
>>>>
>>>>> LOL!!! You proved yourself a liar then.
>>>>
>>>> You really do have a problem with logic and clear thought,
>>>> don't you? And also with honesty, considering that you tried
>>>> to change how my reply would be read by snipping everything
>>>> past "No examples exist". So you're not just an idiot,
>>>> you're a lying idiot.
>>>
>>> I was hoping you could
>>
>> He's right about you, Goo: you're a lying idiot.
>
> I've abandoned the effort to educate him in this thread.

I abandoned the effort to educate him in 1999. Now, I just like to
abuse him for his idiocy.