Sourdough (rec.food.sourdough) Discussing the hobby or craft of baking with sourdough. We are not just a recipe group, Our charter is to discuss the care, feeding, and breeding of yeasts and lactobacilli that make up sourdough cultures.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Wcsjohn
 
Posts: n/a
Default Will - Hydration alone producing gluten structure.

Ok, I've mixed 500 gm 13.9% protein white flour with 400 gm water and 10 gm
salt until smooth, about 8 minutes at speed 1, on my Kenwood, minimal mixing
by my usual standards<g>.

I'll leave in the fridge for 48 hours, let it warm up then add an active SD
culture, mix briefly just to distribute the culture, and see what happens.

The fridge rest should also produce the excellent flavour associated with Pain
a l'Ancienne.

John


  #4 (permalink)   Report Post  
Mike Pearce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Wcsjohn" wrote in message
...

> Ok, I've mixed 500 gm 13.9% protein white flour with 400 gm water and 10

gm
> salt until smooth, about 8 minutes at speed 1, on my Kenwood, minimal

mixing
> by my usual standards<g>.
>
> I'll leave in the fridge for 48 hours, let it warm up then add an active

SD
> culture, mix briefly just to distribute the culture, and see what happens.


Why are you not adding the starter when you first mix the dough?

-Mike



  #5 (permalink)   Report Post  
Wcsjohn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

>
>"Wcsjohn" wrote in message
...
>
>> Ok, I've mixed 500 gm 13.9% protein white flour with 400 gm water and 10

>gm
>> salt until smooth, about 8 minutes at speed 1, on my Kenwood, minimal

>mixing
>> by my usual standards<g>.
>>
>> I'll leave in the fridge for 48 hours, let it warm up then add an active

>SD
>> culture, mix briefly just to distribute the culture, and see what happens.

>
>Why are you not adding the starter when you first mix the dough?
>
>-Mike
>
>

2 reasons, first I'm testing the ability of water alone to produce gluten
structure without the low pH produced by a sourdough culture and secondly, I
like the flavour produced by a no-yeast, Gossellin style rest.

John


  #6 (permalink)   Report Post  
Charles Perry
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Wcsjohn wrote:
>



>... secondly, I like the flavour produced by a no-yeast, Gossellin style rest.
>

How do you folks that use this method overcome the problem of
incomplete mixing of the stater culture and the flour and water
mix? I have tried various combinations of thickness of each and
only have complete mixing when everthing is so thin that I have
to add flour later which I don't think is in the spirit of the
method.

Regards,

Charles
--
Charles Perry
Reply to:

** A balanced diet is a cookie in each hand **
  #7 (permalink)   Report Post  
Wcsjohn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

>
>
>
>Wcsjohn wrote:
>>

>
>
>>... secondly, I like the flavour produced by a no-yeast, Gossellin style

>rest.
>>

>How do you folks that use this method overcome the problem of
>incomplete mixing of the stater culture and the flour and water
>mix? I have tried various combinations of thickness of each and
>only have complete mixing when everthing is so thin that I have
>to add flour later which I don't think is in the spirit of the
>method.
>
>Regards,
>
>Charles
>--
>Charles Perry


I just add the culture to the warmed dough and remix.

If I were sure that the fridge would stop my SD culture completely, I'd add it
at the start. Which is what I do with commercial yeast (but you don't want to
hear about that<g>).

The important thing about the Gosselllin techique is that there is as little
fermentation as possible during the fridge rest.

John

  #9 (permalink)   Report Post  
Dick Adams
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Wcsjohn" > wrote in message =
...

> >Wcsjohn wrote:
> >>... secondly, I like the flavour produced by a no-yeast, Gossellin =

style

> The important thing about the Gosselllin techique is that there is as =

little
> fermentation as possible during the fridge rest.


What is it with the "l"s? 2? 3? Try one "l" (Gosselin) in a search:

http://www.bread-bakers.com/archives...s/v103n006.txt

See item #009.

---
DickA
  #10 (permalink)   Report Post  
Dick Adams
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Wcsjohn" > wrote in message =
...

> >Wcsjohn wrote:
> >>... secondly, I like the flavour produced by a no-yeast, Gossellin =

style

> The important thing about the Gosselllin techique is that there is as =

little
> fermentation as possible during the fridge rest.


What is it with the "l"s? 2? 3? Try one "l" (Gosselin) in a search:

http://www.bread-bakers.com/archives...s/v103n006.txt

See item #009.

---
DickA


  #11 (permalink)   Report Post  
Wcsjohn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

>
>
>
>Wcsjohn wrote:
>>

>
>
>>... secondly, I like the flavour produced by a no-yeast, Gossellin style

>rest.
>>

>How do you folks that use this method overcome the problem of
>incomplete mixing of the stater culture and the flour and water
>mix? I have tried various combinations of thickness of each and
>only have complete mixing when everthing is so thin that I have
>to add flour later which I don't think is in the spirit of the
>method.
>
>Regards,
>
>Charles
>--
>Charles Perry


I just add the culture to the warmed dough and remix.

If I were sure that the fridge would stop my SD culture completely, I'd add it
at the start. Which is what I do with commercial yeast (but you don't want to
hear about that<g>).

The important thing about the Gosselllin techique is that there is as little
fermentation as possible during the fridge rest.

John

  #12 (permalink)   Report Post  
Charles Perry
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Wcsjohn wrote:
>



>... secondly, I like the flavour produced by a no-yeast, Gossellin style rest.
>

How do you folks that use this method overcome the problem of
incomplete mixing of the stater culture and the flour and water
mix? I have tried various combinations of thickness of each and
only have complete mixing when everthing is so thin that I have
to add flour later which I don't think is in the spirit of the
method.

Regards,

Charles
--
Charles Perry
Reply to:

** A balanced diet is a cookie in each hand **
  #13 (permalink)   Report Post  
Wcsjohn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

>
>"Wcsjohn" wrote in message
...
>
>> Ok, I've mixed 500 gm 13.9% protein white flour with 400 gm water and 10

>gm
>> salt until smooth, about 8 minutes at speed 1, on my Kenwood, minimal

>mixing
>> by my usual standards<g>.
>>
>> I'll leave in the fridge for 48 hours, let it warm up then add an active

>SD
>> culture, mix briefly just to distribute the culture, and see what happens.

>
>Why are you not adding the starter when you first mix the dough?
>
>-Mike
>
>

2 reasons, first I'm testing the ability of water alone to produce gluten
structure without the low pH produced by a sourdough culture and secondly, I
like the flavour produced by a no-yeast, Gossellin style rest.

John
  #14 (permalink)   Report Post  
Janet Bostwick
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Wcsjohn" > wrote in message
...
> Ok, I've mixed 500 gm 13.9% protein white flour with 400 gm water and 10

gm
> salt until smooth, about 8 minutes at speed 1, on my Kenwood, minimal

mixing
> by my usual standards<g>.
>
> I'll leave in the fridge for 48 hours, let it warm up then add an active

SD
> culture, mix briefly just to distribute the culture, and see what happens.
>
> The fridge rest should also produce the excellent flavour associated with

Pain
> a l'Ancienne.
>
> John
>

I agree with Kenneth's comments regarding 30 second mix. With 8 minutes,
you've already mixed more than I knead. To mix I just move the ingredients
around with a wooden spoon until I have a really rough looking mass, but no
flour that has not been exposed to liquids. Maybe a minute of hand mixing.
The stuff in the bowl is going to be really rough and shaggy and in heaps
and valleys--not mixed in the proper sense of the word at all. In order to
assure even distribution of all ingredients, I stir all the dry ingredients
together with a wire whisk and blend all wet ingredients, then it is just a
matter of stirring the two together.
Janet


  #16 (permalink)   Report Post  
Wcsjohn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

>
(Wcsjohn) wrote in message
>...
>> Ok, I've mixed 500 gm 13.9% protein white flour with 400 gm water and 10 gm
>> salt until smooth, about 8 minutes at speed 1, on my Kenwood, minimal

>mixing
>> by my usual standards<g>.
>>
>> I'll leave in the fridge for 48 hours, let it warm up then add an active SD
>> culture, mix briefly just to distribute the culture, and see what happens.
>>
>> The fridge rest should also produce the excellent flavour associated with

>Pain
>> a l'Ancienne.
>>
>> John

>
>Ok John, so how did you finish the experiment? Did you leave the glop
>at 80% hydration as typical for you, or did you add more flour? And
>how did it all come out?
>
>--Lisse
>

http://www.zippyimages.com/files/102217/sdancia01.jpg
http://www.zippyimages.com/files/102218/sdancia02.jpg

Show the results, which are not too bad for a first attempt.(Brit
understatement<g>)

Taste was marvellous, deep Ancienne sweetness balanced by sourdough acidity.

I made it up as I went along - details later - but this is one to keep.

John
  #17 (permalink)   Report Post  
Dave Bell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Wcsjohn wrote:

> http://www.zippyimages.com/files/102217/sdancia01.jpg
> http://www.zippyimages.com/files/102218/sdancia02.jpg
>
> Show the results, which are not too bad for a first attempt.(Brit
> understatement<g>)
>
> Taste was marvellous, deep Ancienne sweetness balanced by sourdough acidity.


Loks as marvellous as you say it tastes!

> I made it up as I went along - details later - but this is one to keep.


Yes, PLEASE!

Dave
  #19 (permalink)   Report Post  
Dave Bell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Wcsjohn wrote:

> http://www.zippyimages.com/files/102217/sdancia01.jpg
> http://www.zippyimages.com/files/102218/sdancia02.jpg
>
> Show the results, which are not too bad for a first attempt.(Brit
> understatement<g>)
>
> Taste was marvellous, deep Ancienne sweetness balanced by sourdough acidity.


Loks as marvellous as you say it tastes!

> I made it up as I went along - details later - but this is one to keep.


Yes, PLEASE!

Dave
  #21 (permalink)   Report Post  
Wcsjohn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

>
(Wcsjohn) wrote in message
>...
>> Ok, I've mixed 500 gm 13.9% protein white flour with 400 gm water and 10 gm
>> salt until smooth, about 8 minutes at speed 1, on my Kenwood, minimal

>mixing
>> by my usual standards<g>.
>>
>> I'll leave in the fridge for 48 hours, let it warm up then add an active SD
>> culture, mix briefly just to distribute the culture, and see what happens.
>>
>> The fridge rest should also produce the excellent flavour associated with

>Pain
>> a l'Ancienne.
>>
>> John

>
>Ok John, so how did you finish the experiment? Did you leave the glop
>at 80% hydration as typical for you, or did you add more flour? And
>how did it all come out?
>
>--Lisse
>

http://www.zippyimages.com/files/102217/sdancia01.jpg
http://www.zippyimages.com/files/102218/sdancia02.jpg

Show the results, which are not too bad for a first attempt.(Brit
understatement<g>)

Taste was marvellous, deep Ancienne sweetness balanced by sourdough acidity.

I made it up as I went along - details later - but this is one to keep.

John
  #24 (permalink)   Report Post  
Mike Pearce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Wcsjohn" wrote in message
...

> Ok, I've mixed 500 gm 13.9% protein white flour with 400 gm water and 10

gm
> salt until smooth, about 8 minutes at speed 1, on my Kenwood, minimal

mixing
> by my usual standards<g>.
>
> I'll leave in the fridge for 48 hours, let it warm up then add an active

SD
> culture, mix briefly just to distribute the culture, and see what happens.


Why are you not adding the starter when you first mix the dough?

-Mike



  #25 (permalink)   Report Post  
williamwaller
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Dick said:

>> In fact I did not know who Gosselin is, and was having trouble searching
>> with the double "l", or triple. So now I think I know what the =
>> "Gosselin
>> technique" is, but remain unconviced that it is worth the wait.


John said:

> Well, it will only take a small investment in flour, water and time to confirm
> or refute your lack of conviction.
>


Never happen! Read the fine print in that post. I saw the words: bread
machine. BM users, even in the "tenor of their twilight years" (a simply
beautiful phrase) don't chill.

Will




  #26 (permalink)   Report Post  
Janet Bostwick
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Wcsjohn" > wrote in message
...
> Ok, I've mixed 500 gm 13.9% protein white flour with 400 gm water and 10

gm
> salt until smooth, about 8 minutes at speed 1, on my Kenwood, minimal

mixing
> by my usual standards<g>.
>
> I'll leave in the fridge for 48 hours, let it warm up then add an active

SD
> culture, mix briefly just to distribute the culture, and see what happens.
>
> The fridge rest should also produce the excellent flavour associated with

Pain
> a l'Ancienne.
>
> John
>

I agree with Kenneth's comments regarding 30 second mix. With 8 minutes,
you've already mixed more than I knead. To mix I just move the ingredients
around with a wooden spoon until I have a really rough looking mass, but no
flour that has not been exposed to liquids. Maybe a minute of hand mixing.
The stuff in the bowl is going to be really rough and shaggy and in heaps
and valleys--not mixed in the proper sense of the word at all. In order to
assure even distribution of all ingredients, I stir all the dry ingredients
together with a wire whisk and blend all wet ingredients, then it is just a
matter of stirring the two together.
Janet


  #27 (permalink)   Report Post  
williamwaller
 
Posts: n/a
Default

<snip>

>> It was about inductive cognition. One might anticipate the outcome
>> of a long, cold process via a quick warm experiment.


> One might indeed but one would be wrong. The temperature of a dough affects
> more than the simple reaction rates of any chemical processes and
> extrapolation
> is a risky process when applied to complex systems such as bread dough.


I have pondered the meaning of "inductive cognition" for several hours now.
It has gently carried me through one of my bowls of lactose enhanced cereal
(Thanks Roy), the mixing of some old dough into pizza dough and even the 30
minutes I sat and sweated profusely in the sauna.

The words don't quite fit what Dick is doing... Dick has made a
"conjecture". Cognition has to do with understanding.

Note to newbies lurking: Bone up on epistemology before getting ripped in a
list of take-no-prisoners bread advisors. And use a spell checker!

Will



  #28 (permalink)   Report Post  
Wcsjohn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

>
>>> It was about inductive cognition. One might anticipate the outcome
>>> of a long, cold process via a quick warm experiment.

>
>> One might indeed but one would be wrong. The temperature of a dough affects
>> more than the simple reaction rates of any chemical processes and
>> extrapolation
>> is a risky process when applied to complex systems such as bread dough.

>
>I have pondered the meaning of "inductive cognition" for several hours now.
>It has gently carried me through one of my bowls of lactose enhanced cereal
>(Thanks Roy), the mixing of some old dough into pizza dough and even the 30
>minutes I sat and sweated profusely in the sauna.
>
>The words don't quite fit what Dick is doing... Dick has made a
>"conjecture". Cognition has to do with understanding.
>
>Note to newbies lurking: Bone up on epistemology before getting ripped in a
>list of take-no-prisoners bread advisors. And use a spell checker!
>
>Will
>

Spell checkers are for wimps<g>

John
  #29 (permalink)   Report Post  
Dave Bell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Wcsjohn wrote:

> Spell checkers are for wimps<g>
>
> John

What the heck does Dark Matter have to do with this?

Dave
  #30 (permalink)   Report Post  
Wcsjohn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

>
>Wcsjohn wrote:
>
>> Spell checkers are for wimps<g>
>>
>> John

>What the heck does Dark Matter have to do with this?
>
>Dave
>

"Wildly irresponsible malicious postings" not "weakly interacting massive
particles"<g>

John




  #31 (permalink)   Report Post  
Wcsjohn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

>
>Wcsjohn wrote:
>
>> Spell checkers are for wimps<g>
>>
>> John

>What the heck does Dark Matter have to do with this?
>
>Dave
>

"Wildly irresponsible malicious postings" not "weakly interacting massive
particles"<g>

John


  #32 (permalink)   Report Post  
Wcsjohn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

>
>Wcsjohn wrote:
>
>> Spell checkers are for wimps<g>
>>
>> John

>What the heck does Dark Matter have to do with this?
>
>Dave
>

"Wildly irresponsible malicious postings" not "weakly interacting massive
particles"<g>

John


  #33 (permalink)   Report Post  
Dave Bell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Wcsjohn wrote:

> Spell checkers are for wimps<g>
>
> John

What the heck does Dark Matter have to do with this?

Dave
  #34 (permalink)   Report Post  
Dave Bell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Wcsjohn wrote:

> Spell checkers are for wimps<g>
>
> John

What the heck does Dark Matter have to do with this?

Dave
  #35 (permalink)   Report Post  
Wcsjohn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

>
>>> It was about inductive cognition. One might anticipate the outcome
>>> of a long, cold process via a quick warm experiment.

>
>> One might indeed but one would be wrong. The temperature of a dough affects
>> more than the simple reaction rates of any chemical processes and
>> extrapolation
>> is a risky process when applied to complex systems such as bread dough.

>
>I have pondered the meaning of "inductive cognition" for several hours now.
>It has gently carried me through one of my bowls of lactose enhanced cereal
>(Thanks Roy), the mixing of some old dough into pizza dough and even the 30
>minutes I sat and sweated profusely in the sauna.
>
>The words don't quite fit what Dick is doing... Dick has made a
>"conjecture". Cognition has to do with understanding.
>
>Note to newbies lurking: Bone up on epistemology before getting ripped in a
>list of take-no-prisoners bread advisors. And use a spell checker!
>
>Will
>

Spell checkers are for wimps<g>

John


  #36 (permalink)   Report Post  
Wcsjohn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

>
>>> It was about inductive cognition. One might anticipate the outcome
>>> of a long, cold process via a quick warm experiment.

>
>> One might indeed but one would be wrong. The temperature of a dough affects
>> more than the simple reaction rates of any chemical processes and
>> extrapolation
>> is a risky process when applied to complex systems such as bread dough.

>
>I have pondered the meaning of "inductive cognition" for several hours now.
>It has gently carried me through one of my bowls of lactose enhanced cereal
>(Thanks Roy), the mixing of some old dough into pizza dough and even the 30
>minutes I sat and sweated profusely in the sauna.
>
>The words don't quite fit what Dick is doing... Dick has made a
>"conjecture". Cognition has to do with understanding.
>
>Note to newbies lurking: Bone up on epistemology before getting ripped in a
>list of take-no-prisoners bread advisors. And use a spell checker!
>
>Will
>

Spell checkers are for wimps<g>

John
  #37 (permalink)   Report Post  
williamwaller
 
Posts: n/a
Default

<snip>

>> It was about inductive cognition. One might anticipate the outcome
>> of a long, cold process via a quick warm experiment.


> One might indeed but one would be wrong. The temperature of a dough affects
> more than the simple reaction rates of any chemical processes and
> extrapolation
> is a risky process when applied to complex systems such as bread dough.


I have pondered the meaning of "inductive cognition" for several hours now.
It has gently carried me through one of my bowls of lactose enhanced cereal
(Thanks Roy), the mixing of some old dough into pizza dough and even the 30
minutes I sat and sweated profusely in the sauna.

The words don't quite fit what Dick is doing... Dick has made a
"conjecture". Cognition has to do with understanding.

Note to newbies lurking: Bone up on epistemology before getting ripped in a
list of take-no-prisoners bread advisors. And use a spell checker!

Will



  #38 (permalink)   Report Post  
williamwaller
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Dick said:

>> In fact I did not know who Gosselin is, and was having trouble searching
>> with the double "l", or triple. So now I think I know what the =
>> "Gosselin
>> technique" is, but remain unconviced that it is worth the wait.


John said:

> Well, it will only take a small investment in flour, water and time to confirm
> or refute your lack of conviction.
>


Never happen! Read the fine print in that post. I saw the words: bread
machine. BM users, even in the "tenor of their twilight years" (a simply
beautiful phrase) don't chill.

Will


  #39 (permalink)   Report Post  
williamwaller
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Dick said:

>> In fact I did not know who Gosselin is, and was having trouble searching
>> with the double "l", or triple. So now I think I know what the =
>> "Gosselin
>> technique" is, but remain unconviced that it is worth the wait.


John said:

> Well, it will only take a small investment in flour, water and time to confirm
> or refute your lack of conviction.
>


Never happen! Read the fine print in that post. I saw the words: bread
machine. BM users, even in the "tenor of their twilight years" (a simply
beautiful phrase) don't chill.

Will


  #40 (permalink)   Report Post  
williamwaller
 
Posts: n/a
Default

<snip>

>> It was about inductive cognition. One might anticipate the outcome
>> of a long, cold process via a quick warm experiment.


> One might indeed but one would be wrong. The temperature of a dough affects
> more than the simple reaction rates of any chemical processes and
> extrapolation
> is a risky process when applied to complex systems such as bread dough.


I have pondered the meaning of "inductive cognition" for several hours now.
It has gently carried me through one of my bowls of lactose enhanced cereal
(Thanks Roy), the mixing of some old dough into pizza dough and even the 30
minutes I sat and sweated profusely in the sauna.

The words don't quite fit what Dick is doing... Dick has made a
"conjecture". Cognition has to do with understanding.

Note to newbies lurking: Bone up on epistemology before getting ripped in a
list of take-no-prisoners bread advisors. And use a spell checker!

Will





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Producing gluten with regular flour Regina Schmid Vegetarian cooking 1 30-04-2007 12:29 PM
Rock salt-crystaline structure tandemcap General Cooking 5 17-04-2005 08:16 PM
Kneading, hydration, gluten content, andholes(coarsely-textured crumb) williamwaller Sourdough 27 27-09-2004 11:31 PM
Kneading, hydration, gluten content, and holes(coarsely-textured crumb) williamwaller Sourdough 20 26-09-2004 07:27 PM
Kneading, hydration, gluten content, and holes (coarsely-textured crumb) Dick Adams Sourdough 46 20-09-2004 11:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"