Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello. I found this group a long time ago and saved it, as it appears
to have some great food conversations. Although, rarely could I find a food conversation I wouldn't enjoy ![]() Before diving in and creating havoc, I thought it best to inquire about the ng rules/FAQ's. I'm not sure how formal this group is, or how open the group is to new members. Advice? Missy in Indiana |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > wrote > Hello. I found this group a long time ago and saved it, as it appears > to have some great food conversations. Although, rarely could I find a > food conversation I wouldn't enjoy ![]() > > Before diving in and creating havoc, I thought it best to inquire about > the ng rules/FAQ's. I'm not sure how formal this group is, or how open > the group is to new members. Advice? Hi Missy, welcome to the group. Below is the pointer to the FAQ which I lifted from Victor Sack. And stick around. This is a weekly pointer to the rec.food.cooking FAQ and conversion file. If you do not want to see it every week, you should put the title, which will not change, into your killfile. The rec.food.cooking FAQ and conversion file is posted monthly to rec.food.cooking, rec.food.recipes, rec.answers and news.answers. It is also available as an easy-to-navigate frames version at <http://vsack.homepage.t-online.de/rfc_faq.html>. There is both a link to a no-frames version and a built-in no-frames content for older or text-only browsers. The rec.food.cooking FAQ and conversion file has two parts. The first part covers conversion and equivalence. Tables are given for conversion of oven temperatures, food names, weights and measures. Some useful substitutions for unavailable ingredients are suggested. The second part is more descriptive. It outlines some of the commonly discussed topics of rec.food.cooking and explains a number of food terms. It also lists other food-related newsgroups and mailing lists, as well as food-related FAQs, recipe archives and other food/cooking sites. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi, mhrust--Welcome to the group. We cover all sorts of things, mostly
about cooking. We also get into OT (off topic) subjects, which we label "OT" in the header. Lots of friendly repartee, (and some not so friendly, but ignore that.) We like to ask and answer questions about cooking, and related subjects, so come along and enjoy. Regards, Nancree |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Dec 2005 16:26:11 -0800, " >
wrote: > Hello. I found this group a long time ago and saved it, as it appears > to have some great food conversations. Although, rarely could I find a > food conversation I wouldn't enjoy ![]() > > Before diving in and creating havoc, I thought it best to inquire about > the ng rules/FAQ's. I'm not sure how formal this group is, or how open > the group is to new members. Advice? > > Missy in Indiana Hi Missy! Welcome to the group! Victor Sack posts directions to the FAQ once a week, and the FAQ itself once a month. You can find it in Google easily enough. Are you familiar with google? http://groups.google.com/group/rec.food.cooking And we like a little friendly havoc! Come on in, the water's ... simmering. Carol -- http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/head_trollop/my_photos |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Dec 2005 16:26:11 -0800, " >
rummaged among random neurons and opined: >Hello. I found this group a long time ago and saved it, as it appears >to have some great food conversations. Although, rarely could I find a >food conversation I wouldn't enjoy ![]() > >Before diving in and creating havoc, I thought it best to inquire about >the ng rules/FAQ's. I'm not sure how formal this group is, or how open >the group is to new members. Advice? Welcome, Missy - you've had some good advice from Nancy and Nancree. If you basically thing of this ng as a really big kaffee klatch, you won't be far off the mark. We discuss food, recipes, food preparation, food related equipment and anything else you care to think of that would occur to a foodie. That said, you'll see a lot of OT (off topic) threads about everything under the sun. As long as you clearly mark your post "OT," you should be okay, as those folks who don't want to read anything OT can skip by the thread. Have fun! Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA "If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner." -- Duncan Hines To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox" |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" wrote:
> > Before diving in and creating havoc, I thought it best to inquire > about the ng rules/FAQ's. I'm not sure how formal this group is, > or how open the group is to new members. Advice? I just checked the RFC membership list, and you aren't a registered user. Non-members can view the traffic on RFC, but you shouldn't post anything. I can understand why you don't want to register -- some people are uncomfortable giving out their Safeway membership card number -- but them's the rules! You could always get an extra membership card and use that one for registering, but that's not really nice. Hope this helps :-) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Thorson wrote:
> " wrote: >> >> Before diving in and creating havoc, I thought it best to inquire >> about the ng rules/FAQ's. I'm not sure how formal this group is, >> or how open the group is to new members. Advice? > > I just checked the RFC membership list, and you aren't > a registered user. Non-members can view the traffic > on RFC, but you shouldn't post anything. I can understand > why you don't want to register -- some people are > uncomfortable giving out their Safeway membership card Oh hush, Mark ![]() Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi, again, Missy,
Here is the address for RFC: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.food.cooking I think you can get to RFC just by posting to this group, as you already have with your first question. I've been on RFC for years, and don't know anything about members or non-members, and I never heard of a RFC membership list--but as far as I know, you can just join right in. I think there's no need for registration. So post anything you like. We look forward to hearing from you. (Newsgroups are accessed in different ways, depending on what your system offers. Perhaps Mark Thorson's access group requires some sort of registration. Mine doesn't. I use Google Groups Beta ) Good luck. Nancree |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com>,
" > wrote: > Hello. I found this group a long time ago and saved it, as it appears > to have some great food conversations. Although, rarely could I find a > food conversation I wouldn't enjoy ![]() > > Before diving in and creating havoc, I thought it best to inquire about > the ng rules/FAQ's. I'm not sure how formal this group is, or how open > the group is to new members. Advice? > > Missy in Indiana Gladly, Missy. And a hearty welcome to you, too. The Registration Fee is $250, payable to me. Just because there are so many off-topic posts here doesn't mean it's a good thing to do. The Initiation Fee is $750, payable to me. Victor Sack regularly posts a pointer to the extensive FAQ file although someone else can probably point you there. Most people don't bother to read the FAQ file until they're told. Monthly dues are $7.50, payable to me. Pirohy are triangular and don't you forget it. Sheldon is a potty mouth and trying to change his ways is not recommended because it would simply be an exercise in futility for you. Beets are the work of the Devil. There is no such thing as Alfredo Sauce. The Cabal (TINC) enforces the rules heretofore stated. (Didja like that, Squeaks?) The annual sacrifice of the virgins is scheduled for April. Born-again Virgins are welcome to participate. Damsel is the Head Trollop. I yam what I yam. If you don't have a thick skin and can't develop one, leave now and save yourself grief. For a price, anyone is welcome. Payable to me. Civilized disagreement is welcome. There's no need to demonstrate your ignorance with nasty name-calling. OT at the beginning of a subject line means it's off topic (and should probably be posted somewhere else). Once you've posted here, expect a ton of spam in your mailbox; rec.food.cooking is a popular group. Margaret Suran is a nice woman but she drinks a lot. Terry Pulliam Burd has a rapier wit. The Bobs are good guys, all of them. Jim Lattie likes my brownies. If you can killfile with AOL, learn how and save yourself annoyance at the idiots. Most of us are full of bullshit. Some are more eager to show it than others. Don't mistake this group for "family." We're not your family. I've got a great and easy recipe for Peanut Brittle. Don't post anything political. There are other groups for that. My kids are smarter than yours. I think that covers most of it. Welcome to the fray, Missy. You may email me privately through my website for my address for the fees and dues. -Barb Schaller Mother Superior -- http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 12-11-05 - Good Food, Good Friends |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nancree wrote:
> Hi, again, Missy, > Here is the address for RFC: > > http://groups.google.com/group/rec.food.cooking > > I think you can get to RFC just by posting to this group, as you > already have with your first question. I've been on RFC for years, > and don't know anything about members or non-member > Nancree That's because there is no such thing, Nancree. TINC Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Mark Thorson > wrote: > " wrote: > > > > Before diving in and creating havoc, I thought it best to inquire > > about the ng rules/FAQ's. I'm not sure how formal this group is, > > or how open the group is to new members. Advice? > > I just checked the RFC membership list, and you aren't > a registered user. Non-members can view the traffic > on RFC, but you shouldn't post anything. I can understand > why you don't want to register -- some people are > uncomfortable giving out their Safeway membership card > number -- but them's the rules! You could always get > an extra membership card and use that one for registering, > but that's not really nice. Hope this helps :-) Thorson, did your mother slap you when you were a kid? She should have. LOL! Poor Missy's going to believe you -- it appears that Nancree does and offers counsel. Shame on you. :-) -- http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 12-11-05 - Good Food, Good Friends |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> Pirohy are triangular and don't you forget it. > -Barb Schaller > Mother Superior really? cuz i just had some that were semi-circular. weird that. -- ..:Heather:. www.velvet-c.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2005-12-12, Melba's Jammin' > wrote:
> Gladly, Missy. And a hearty welcome to you, too. > The Registration Fee is $250, payable to me. > Just because there are so many off-topic posts here doesn't mean it's a > good thing to do. > The Initiation Fee is $750, payable to me. ....'course, fer a sixpack and a Hostess Berry Pie, I'll run interference point out the scammers. ![]() nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:58:52 -0600, notbob >
replied: > On 2005-12-12, Melba's Jammin' > wrote: > > Gladly, Missy. And a hearty welcome to you, too. > > The Registration Fee is $250, payable to me. > > Just because there are so many off-topic posts here doesn't > > mean it's a good thing to do. The Initiation Fee is $750, > > payable to me. > > > ...'course, fer a sixpack and a Hostess Berry Pie, I'll run > interference point out the scammers. ![]() The CABAL will serve your heads on silver platters for poaching the company pond like this! Amateurs. The Ranger |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jill said:
"That's because there is no such thing, Nancree My point, exactly , Jill. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
notbob > wrote: > On 2005-12-12, Melba's Jammin' > wrote: > > > Gladly, Missy. And a hearty welcome to you, too. > > The Registration Fee is $250, payable to me. > > Just because there are so many off-topic posts here doesn't mean it's a > > good thing to do. > > The Initiation Fee is $750, payable to me. > > ...'course, fer a sixpack and a Hostess Berry Pie, I'll run > interference point out the scammers. ![]() > > nb Butt out, Bub, and getcher own show! "-) -- http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 12-11-05 - Good Food, Good Friends |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Ranger > wrote in
: > > The CABAL will serve your heads on silver platters for poaching > the company pond like this! > > Amateurs. > > The Ranger > TINC Rhonda Anderson Cranebrook, NSW, Australia |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Heather wrote:
>> Pirohy are triangular and don't you forget it. >> -Barb Schaller >> Mother Superior > > really? > cuz i just had some that were semi-circular. > weird that. I have some semi-circular THINGS in my freezer. If not for that shape, they'd qualify as potato-filled pirohy. When I get home from work, I think I'll deep-fry them and have them with an avocado-honey-lemon-mustard dipping sauce. And I'll eat them with chopsticks. Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "nancree" > ha scritto nel messaggio ups.com... > Hi, mhrust--Welcome to the group. We cover all sorts of things, mostly > about cooking. We also get into OT (off topic) subjects, which we > label "OT" in the header. Lots of friendly repartee, (and some not so > friendly, but ignore that.) We like to ask and answer questions about > cooking, and related subjects, so come along and enjoy. > Regards, > Nancree I agree! Welcome! pandora > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey, Jill,
"Res Ipsa Loquitor" Nancree |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Joseph LIttleshoes > wrote: (snippage) > Find a knitch Never mind the knitch; get a bagel instead. > and settle in, pull up a foot stool and tell us what you > like to eat, do you have a guilty secret like me, sometimes i like > making the food more than i like eating it. I routinely make way more > food than i need to. Just for the fun of cooking. So much for secret. -- http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 12-11-05 - Good Food, Good Friends |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > On the one hand you say you found us 'long ago' but on the other hand > your delicacy suggest a lack of experience with the unmoderated news > group phenom?? Well, my memory is pretty pitiful, but I'm guessing maybe more than a year ago I ran across this group. I somehow saved or kept it in a favorites area. I kept saying, "When I have more time I'll come back to it". As everyone knows, we don't get more tiime - we just adjust it differently ![]() in regardless of consistency. Also, I used to be very involved in three related unmoderated news groups for roughly 8 years. Surprisingly, my experience there is what prompted me to step my foot lightly in these waters before barreling through and getting my leg bitten off by an anaconda! LOL! Upon looking into the newsgroups, I found AOL no longer has my comfort zone set up...it's now a google thing, which obviously everyone here already knows. But, for me, it's a little odd at first. >After a while, once you understand what a 'burtchen schvitzer' he is you learn to ignore >him, I will need to learn how to killfile...everyone talks about it, but I've no experience with it. I must say that this group seems lively and offers more than a few chuckles ![]() I'll admit my food knowledge is not up to most of your standards, but my waist doesn't seem to notice ![]() Nanny (Gma) were my teachers and I try to do them proud. They were absolutely amazing cooks! I miss them - especially at this time of year - and find cooking and baking to be very comforting and probably my single most favorite hobby. My children (they are 4 1/2yo's) looove cooking. They each are allowed to choose one TV show a day to enjoy. You can bet that a food show always is chosen by one over all the kid-friendly shows out there. Barefoot Contessa is our favorite, but we love them all. It would be too hard to name a favorite food, but I'm enjoying a few recent recipes listed here. Actually, I hadn't made split pea soup since last year until seeing a post the other day. I pulled stools up to the counter and the girls helped me make a yummy split pea soup and homemade sundried tomato bread (oh, that's not quite right - it was from a bread machine - we just added herbs and sundried tomatoes). It's great with young ones around. I think a lot of children wouldn't have tried it...but when you make it yourself, it's extra enticing. Anyway, thanks to everyone for the very warm welcome. I'll pull up a seat and join you more often. Seems very cozy in here ![]() Missy in Indiana |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OMGoodness! As soon as I saw the sig line I thought, "No, it couldn't
be...". Small news group universe, huh?! Thanks for the insight...this group seems right up my ally. Unfortunately, I may gain more than I can offer here. My family and friends think I'm nearly a gourmet chef...they're easy to fool. I really only know enough to be dangerous ![]() thread to say, "hi". It's nice to see you and I hope you are well. Missy in Indiana |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Melba's Jammin'" > wrote in message ... > In article .com>, > " > wrote: > >> Hello. I found this group a long time ago and saved it, as it appears >> to have some great food conversations. Although, rarely could I find a >> food conversation I wouldn't enjoy ![]() >> >> Before diving in and creating havoc, I thought it best to inquire about >> the ng rules/FAQ's. I'm not sure how formal this group is, or how open >> the group is to new members. Advice? >> >> Missy in Indiana > > Gladly, Missy. And a hearty welcome to you, too. > The Registration Fee is $250, payable to me. > Just because there are so many off-topic posts here doesn't mean it's a > good thing to do. > The Initiation Fee is $750, payable to me. > Victor Sack regularly posts a pointer to the extensive FAQ file although > someone else can probably point you there. > Most people don't bother to read the FAQ file until they're told. > Monthly dues are $7.50, payable to me. > Pirohy are triangular and don't you forget it. > Sheldon is a potty mouth and trying to change his ways is not > recommended because it would simply be an exercise in futility for you. > Beets are the work of the Devil. > There is no such thing as Alfredo Sauce. > The Cabal (TINC) enforces the rules heretofore stated. (Didja like > that, Squeaks?) > The annual sacrifice of the virgins is scheduled for April. Born-again > Virgins are welcome to participate. > Damsel is the Head Trollop. > I yam what I yam. > If you don't have a thick skin and can't develop one, leave now and save > yourself grief. > For a price, anyone is welcome. Payable to me. > Civilized disagreement is welcome. There's no need to demonstrate your > ignorance with nasty name-calling. > OT at the beginning of a subject line means it's off topic (and should > probably be posted somewhere else). > Once you've posted here, expect a ton of spam in your mailbox; > rec.food.cooking is a popular group. > Margaret Suran is a nice woman but she drinks a lot. > Terry Pulliam Burd has a rapier wit. > The Bobs are good guys, all of them. > Jim Lattie likes my brownies. > If you can killfile with AOL, learn how and save yourself annoyance at > the idiots. > Most of us are full of bullshit. Some are more eager to show it than > others. > Don't mistake this group for "family." We're not your family. > I've got a great and easy recipe for Peanut Brittle. Maybe, maybe not...the verdict on this one is out till further testing in the Village Idiot kitchen. If my hands aren't too burnt to type, I'll post results. nyuck nyuck chipper > Don't post anything political. There are other groups for that. > My kids are smarter than yours. > I think that covers most of it. > Welcome to the fray, Missy. You may email me privately through my > website for my address for the fees and dues. > > -Barb Schaller > Mother Superior > -- > http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 12-11-05 - Good Food, Good Friends |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-L. wrote:
> Welcome Missy in IN. ![]() > This group is *way* more laid back than the infertility groups. Hang > around, check us out and post! I think I recognize you from another group as well. Do you have dogs, cats, snakes and a turtle? becca -- "I like that people say it's harder to quit smoking than to kick heroin. This makes me feel really good because now I know I can develop a heroin addiction and quit it. Obviously I'll be able to." -Pamie |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:43:29 GMT, "Bob Myers"
> wrote: > Oh, and since Sheldon's already been mentioned - > is anyone gonna say a few words about Chung?) I intentionally keep Chung *out* of my killfile. That way, when I see his name, I can identify an entire thread to killfile. > Oh, and while we're on the subject of Netiquette - please > Trim Thy Posts. There's nothing worse than having to wade > through 300 lines of previously-read cra...err, stuff...only to > find two new lines that essentially boil down to "me, too!" There are some people I really like, but rarely read for exactly that reason. If I didn't like them, I'd killfile them for exactly that reason. (hint-hint-hint) Every once in awhile, you absolutely need the whole thing for content, but not often. Carol -- http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/head_trollop/my_photos |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Melba's Jammin'" > wrote in message ... > Gladly, Missy. And a hearty welcome to you, too. > The Registration Fee is $250, payable to me. > Just because there are so many off-topic posts here doesn't mean it's a > good thing to do. > The Initiation Fee is $750, payable to me. > Victor Sack regularly posts a pointer to the extensive FAQ file although > someone else can probably point you there. > Most people don't bother to read the FAQ file until they're told. Or bother to pay the dues, either...:-) > Sheldon is a potty mouth and trying to change his ways is not > recommended because it would simply be an exercise in futility for you. Killfile early, killfile often. Life becomes SO much more pleasant when you do... > Beets are the work of the Devil. > There is no such thing as Alfredo Sauce. The jury is still out, in fact, on whether or not there is even an Alfredo to begin with. Hey, to REALLY get the discussion going we should come up with some sort of sauce made with beets, cheese, and cream - which of course would then have to be served in a martini glass... > If you don't have a thick skin and can't develop one, leave now and save > yourself grief. Thick skin developer is, however, available in the gift shop. Go for the 55-gallon drum - it's the best deal, and God only knows you can never have too much of that stuff. > OT at the beginning of a subject line means it's off topic (and should > probably be posted somewhere else). Oh, come on - if ALL the OT posts left the group, what would there be LEFT? (But seriously, ladies and germs...DO try to limit your OT postings to only those things which one might reasonably expect a group such as this to actually have an interest in. Oh, and since Sheldon's already been mentioned - is anyone gonna say a few words about Chung?) Oh, and while we're on the subject of Netiquette - please Trim Thy Posts. There's nothing worse than having to wade through 300 lines of previously-read cra...err, stuff...only to find two new lines that essentially boil down to "me, too!" Top-posting, on the other hand, is also considered a faux pas, although might be accepted in some very special cases. Otherwise, it is about as welcome as belching garlic breath when being introduced to the Queen... > The Bobs are good guys, all of them. This is why we all continue to pay Microsoft royalties for continued use of the Holy Name... > Don't mistake this group for "family." We're not your family. We ARE, however, dysfunctional. Surely that should count for SOMETHING. > Don't post anything political. There are other groups for that. On the other hand, if you DO have a good Bush joke... Bob M. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> In article >, > Joseph LIttleshoes > wrote: > (snippage) > > Find a knitch > > Never mind the knitch; get a bagel instead. > > > and settle in, pull up a foot stool and tell us what you > > like to eat, do you have a guilty secret like me, sometimes i like > > making the food more than i like eating it. I routinely make way > more > > food than i need to. Just for the fun of cooking. > > So much for secret. And then! "Glory of Glories" i find a medium where i can talk/write about it without people's eyes glazing over and trying to change the subject. But, caveat emptor, just as i seem to be finding my 'voice' in the net, i am losing interest in it. I am seriously considering upgrading to a whole new system or abandoning the net altogether as, fundamentally, a waste of time. Not that i have a lot better going on in my life but i could have more of it if i stopped doing this. --- JL > -- > http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 12-11-05 - Good Food, Good > Friends |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Joseph LIttleshoes wrote: > > And then! "Glory of Glories" i find a medium where i can talk/write > about it without people's eyes glazing over and trying to change the > subject. > > But, caveat emptor, just as i seem to be finding my 'voice' in the net, > i am losing interest in it. > > I am seriously considering upgrading to a whole new system or abandoning > the net altogether as, fundamentally, a waste of time. That would be our loss but I do understand the concern. How about if you 'rewarded' yourself with net time for completing other worthwhile activities? Or some such form of rationing? -aem |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2005-12-12, Rhonda Anderson > wrote:
>> The CABAL will serve your heads on silver platters for poaching >> the company pond like this! Does the CABAL serve h'ors deurves, first? nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joseph LIttleshoes wrote:
> Melba's Jammin' wrote: > > >>In article >, >> Joseph LIttleshoes > wrote: >>(snippage) >> >>>Find a knitch >> >>Never mind the knitch; get a bagel instead. >> >> >>>and settle in, pull up a foot stool and tell us what you >>>like to eat, do you have a guilty secret like me, sometimes i like >>>making the food more than i like eating it. I routinely make way >> >>more >> >>>food than i need to. Just for the fun of cooking. >> >>So much for secret. > > > And then! "Glory of Glories" i find a medium where i can talk/write > about it without people's eyes glazing over and trying to change the > subject. Yep. I thought this ng was really cool when I stumbled upon it. > > But, caveat emptor, just as i seem to be finding my 'voice' in the net, > i am losing interest in it. And yep. I find I'm losing interest in not only this ng but ngs in general. There is just too much junk and nastiness to wade through anymore. I can remember when I first started using usenet. It was a considerably nicer environment then. Now it seems to be who can sit on the computer the most and make the rudest or crudest comments. > > I am seriously considering upgrading to a whole new system or abandoning > the net altogether as, fundamentally, a waste of time. Not that i have > a lot better going on in my life but i could have more of it if i > stopped doing this. Like you, I am considering abandoning the net or at least a portion of it - usenet. The net itself has been quite useful for us in the past little while allowing us to track down hard to find appliance parts, get mapping directions, and I do like my ebooks in PDA format. We found this really neat website where I ordered a few appliance parts while still in my pjs. The parcel was in my postal box within 2 days! I was very impressed so I would still use it for that and I do like ebay. I think for finding info the net is great but maybe the chat/usenet thing is just wearing out for me. People will say things online they would never have the nerve to say directly to someone's face. For that reason alone, usenet is seriously becoming a waste of time if you post. If you just lurk or google, it isn't too bad. > --- > JL > > >>-- >>http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 12-11-05 - Good Food, Good >>Friends > > > > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:29:42 -0600, notbob >
replied: >>> The CABAL will serve your heads on silver platters for poaching >>> the company pond like this! > >Does the CABAL serve h'ors deurves, first? Yes; beets. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Ranger wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:29:42 -0600, notbob > > replied: > >>> The CABAL will serve your heads on silver platters for > >>> poaching the company pond like this! > > > >Does the CABAL serve h'ors deurves, first? > > Yes; beets. Wrapped in a creamy puree of Brussels sprouts. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> I intentionally keep Chung out of my killfile. That way, when I see > his name, I can identify an entire thread to killfile. There's a better way, but you need a newsreader with more robust filtering than some have. Chung threads are almost always cross-posted to a certain set of newsgroups. Filter those, filter the word "chung" in the subject, almost 100% clearance. Brian -- If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > I think I recognize you from another group as well. Do you have dogs, > cats, snakes and a turtle? > Well, whirlygirl/becca sounds increasingly familiar to me...I've no idea why. I have a dog/child. (Yep, I'm one of those annoying pet parents.) The only ng's I've been part of are infertility-based. I'm sure over the course of 9 years I've perused a handful of ng's, but rarely would I speak up. The only other ng I recall popping into is a cruising ng...another love. But, I wasn't active nor was I there for more than a blink of the eye ![]() HTH, Missy in Indiana |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2005-12-12, Mark Thorson > wrote:
>> Yes; beets. Excellent. I'll be there early. nb |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
newbie | General Cooking | |||
Newbie Q's | Winemaking | |||
A NEWBIE HERE!!!.... | Recipes | |||
newbie following newbie pu er threads | Tea |