On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:30:43 -0500, Melba's Jammin'
> wrote:

>In article >, Sheryl Rosen
> wrote:
>
>> Anyway, I forgot to add it once, and I liked the result. Very fudgey!
>> So I omit it.
>
>Describe fudgy for me. (This ought to be interesting). I went to a
>Tastefully Simple party once and they had these fudgy brownies and I
>thought they were icky and underbaked - the consistency of
>thick-enough-to-hold-its-shape batter - like raw. Is that what you're
>talking about?
>--
>-Barb, <http://www.jamlady.eboard.com> 8/3/05 New York-Vermont tab (a
>couple pictures added to the 7/29 note on 8/5)

I too prefer fudgy brownies to cakey ones. Fudgy is just what it
sounds like -- with a chewy consistency (like fudge, duh!) rather than
a crumbly one. Your recipe tends to be on the cakey side of the
brownie spectrum, IMO&E, which is groovalacious if you like cakey
brownies. And yours <grovel> is the only, the ONLY, cakey brownie
recipe I like :-)

How'd I do?

Now stop bugging Margaret and making her sound like a lush, she's
merely a woman of grace and style :-)

TammyM