Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, August 13, 2018 at 9:03:38 PM UTC-5, Sheldon wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 18:31:43 -0700 (PDT), " > > wrote: > > >On Monday, August 13, 2018 at 8:04:15 PM UTC-5, Sheldon wrote: > >> > >> You likely say fortay... it's properly pronounced FORT! > >> > >> > >It is spelled forte and can be pronounced as either fort or fortay. > >That would be a long A. > > Can be, however fortay is the pronunciation of the uneducated, like > the majority of newscasters. > If any are interested "fort" refers to the hilt of a sword. > > forte [ˈfôrˌtā, fôrt] NOUN a thing at which someone excels. "small talk was not his forte" synonyms: strength · strong point · specialty · long suit · strong suit · talent · fencing the stronger part of a sword blade, from the hilt to the middle |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, August 13, 2018 at 9:04:15 PM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
> >Ed Pawlowski wrote: > >> On 8/13/2018 6:53 PM, jmcquown wrote: > >> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> After lamb pancakes are my least favorite food... > >>>>> > >>>>> I've never heard of lamb pancakes. > >>>> > >>>> You demonstrate the reading ability of a retarded five year old. > >>>> > >>> Grammar really isn't your forte, is it? It should read: "After lamb, > >>> pancakes are..." > >>> > >>> Jill > > You likely say fortay... it's properly pronounced FORT! Deflection noted. > That would be one of those redundant commas that yoose comma freaks > stick everywhere, even up your orifices. A comma does NOT belong in > my sentence. With all the reading you claim to do you are wasting > your time... you are incapable of reading comprehension as well. Your subordinate clause needs a comma. Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, August 13, 2018 at 10:03:38 PM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 18:31:43 -0700 (PDT), " > > wrote: > > >On Monday, August 13, 2018 at 8:04:15 PM UTC-5, Sheldon wrote: > >> > >> You likely say fortay... it's properly pronounced FORT! > >> > >> > >It is spelled forte and can be pronounced as either fort or fortay. > >That would be a long A. > > Can be, however fortay is the pronunciation of the uneducated, like > the majority of newscasters. > If any are interested "fort" refers to the hilt of a sword. Perhaps. "Forte" is the French word for "strong". Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 03:10:46 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote: >On Monday, August 13, 2018 at 10:03:38 PM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote: >> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 18:31:43 -0700 (PDT), " >> > wrote: >> >> >On Monday, August 13, 2018 at 8:04:15 PM UTC-5, Sheldon wrote: >> >> >> >> You likely say fortay... it's properly pronounced FORT! >> >> >> >> >> >It is spelled forte and can be pronounced as either fort or fortay. >> >That would be a long A. >> >> Can be, however fortay is the pronunciation of the uneducated, like >> the majority of newscasters. >> If any are interested "fort" refers to the hilt of a sword. > >Perhaps. "Forte" is the French word for "strong". It's the female form of the French adjective 'fort', which means strong. I don't really see how that became a noun in English. I blame Italian. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 03:10:46 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote: >On Monday, August 13, 2018 at 10:03:38 PM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote: >> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 18:31:43 -0700 (PDT), " >> > wrote: >> >> >On Monday, August 13, 2018 at 8:04:15 PM UTC-5, Sheldon wrote: >> >> >> >> You likely say fortay... it's properly pronounced FORT! >> >> >> >> >> >It is spelled forte and can be pronounced as either fort or fortay. >> >That would be a long A. >> >> Can be, however fortay is the pronunciation of the uneducated, like >> the majority of newscasters. >> If any are interested "fort" refers to the hilt of a sword. > >Perhaps. "Forte" is the French word for "strong". > >Cindy Hamilton MW gives a delightful little explaination. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forte |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/14/2018 8:28 AM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>>>> On Monday, August 13, 2018 at 8:04:15 PM UTC-5, Sheldon wrote: >>>>> >>>>> You likely say fortay... it's properly pronounced FORT! >>> >>> Can be, however fortay is the pronunciation of the uneducated, like >>> the majority of newscasters. >>> If any are interested "fort" refers to the hilt of a sword. >> >> Perhaps. "Forte" is the French word for "strong". >> >> Cindy Hamilton > > MW gives a delightful little explaination. > > https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forte > Well, thanks for that. I listened to the podcast and it explains it well. Others should give a listen if they want clarification. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 9:34:03 AM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> > On 8/14/2018 8:28 AM, Boron Elgar wrote: > > > > > > MW gives a delightful little explaination. > > > > https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forte > > > > Well, thanks for that. I listened to the podcast and it explains it > well. Others should give a listen if they want clarification. > > Yes, that was interesting! And like the announcer said no matter how you pronounce it, someone will take offense of your pronunciation. (Sheldon, this is where you come in screaming at us about how uneducated we are.) Personally, I'll stick with MY pronunciation as fortay. Long A. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:45:04 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote: >On 8/13/2018 10:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >> On 8/13/2018 9:04 PM, wrote: >>> >>>> Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>> On 8/13/2018 6:53 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> After lamb pancakes are my least favorite food... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've never heard of lamb pancakes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You demonstrate the reading ability of a retarded five year old. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Grammar really isn't your forte, is it?* It should read: "After lamb, >>>>>> pancakes are..." >>>>>> >>>>>> Jill >>> >>> *A comma does NOT belong in >>> my sentence.* With all the reading you claim to do you are wasting >>> your time... you are incapable of reading comprehension as well. >>> >> >> >> When starting* sentence with "After" it clues you in that it is a list >> that requires a comma.* It sounds like you are talking about lamb >> pancakes* Substitute blueberry and it sounds like you are talking about >> pancakes with blueberries, not two separate items. > >Thank you, Ed. ![]() Two stutterers. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/14/2018 1:03 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:45:04 -0400, jmcquown > > wrote: > >> On 8/13/2018 10:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>> On 8/13/2018 9:04 PM, wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>>> On 8/13/2018 6:53 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> After lamb pancakes are my least favorite food... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've never heard of lamb pancakes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You demonstrate the reading ability of a retarded five year old. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Grammar really isn't your forte, is it?* It should read: "After lamb, >>>>>>> pancakes are..." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jill >>>> >>>> *A comma does NOT belong in >>>> my sentence.* With all the reading you claim to do you are wasting >>>> your time... you are incapable of reading comprehension as well. >>>> >>> >>> >>> When starting* sentence with "After" it clues you in that it is a list >>> that requires a comma.* It sounds like you are talking about lamb >>> pancakes* Substitute blueberry and it sounds like you are talking about >>> pancakes with blueberries, not two separate items. >> >> Thank you, Ed. ![]() > > Two stutterers. > Admit it, you're wrong. It's not that difficult. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/14/2018 1:20 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 8/14/2018 1:03 PM, wrote: >> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:45:04 -0400, jmcquown > >> wrote: >> >>> On 8/13/2018 10:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>> On 8/13/2018 9:04 PM, wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/13/2018 6:53 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> After lamb pancakes are my least favorite food... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've never heard of lamb pancakes. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You demonstrate the reading ability of a retarded five year old. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Grammar really isn't your forte, is it?* It should read: "After >>>>>>>> lamb, >>>>>>>> pancakes are..." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jill >>>>> >>>>> **A comma does NOT belong in >>>>> my sentence.* With all the reading you claim to do you are wasting >>>>> your time... you are incapable of reading comprehension as well. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> When starting* sentence with "After" it clues you in that it is a list >>>> that requires a comma.* It sounds like you are talking about lamb >>>> pancakes* Substitute blueberry and it sounds like you are talking about >>>> pancakes with blueberries, not two separate items. >>> >>> Thank you, Ed. ![]() >> >> Two stutterers. >> > Admit it, you're wrong.* It's not that difficult. > > Jill I bet he speaks it with that slight pause represented by a comma. He should clarify with his wife that teaches. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> On 8/14/2018 1:03 PM, wrote: >> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:45:04 -0400, jmcquown > >> wrote: >> >>> On 8/13/2018 10:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>> On 8/13/2018 9:04 PM, wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/13/2018 6:53 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> After lamb pancakes are my least favorite food... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've never heard of lamb pancakes. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You demonstrate the reading ability of a retarded five year old. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Grammar really isn't your forte, is it? It should read: "After >>>>>>>> lamb, >>>>>>>> pancakes are..." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jill >>>>> >>>>> A comma does NOT belong in >>>>> my sentence. With all the reading you claim to do you are wasting >>>>> your time... you are incapable of reading comprehension as well. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> When starting sentence with "After" it clues you in that it is a list >>>> that requires a comma. It sounds like you are talking about lamb >>>> pancakes Substitute blueberry and it sounds like you are talking about >>>> pancakes with blueberries, not two separate items. >>> >>> Thank you, Ed. ![]() >> >> Two stutterers. >> > Admit it, you're wrong. It's not that difficult. > > Jill It is IMPOSSIBLE for Popeye. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 13:03:04 -0400, wrote:
>On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:45:04 -0400, jmcquown > >wrote: > >>On 8/13/2018 10:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>> On 8/13/2018 9:04 PM, wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>>> On 8/13/2018 6:53 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> After lamb pancakes are my least favorite food... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've never heard of lamb pancakes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You demonstrate the reading ability of a retarded five year old. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Grammar really isn't your forte, is it?* It should read: "After lamb, >>>>>>> pancakes are..." >>>>>>> Jill Are you serious? I no longer believe that you do a lot of yeading. At the level you've demonstrated you read (Little Golden Books) it would take you a year to read a copy of National Inquirer and maybe comprehend half. I'm serious. >>>> *A comma does NOT belong in >>>> my sentence.* With all the reading you claim to do you are wasting >>>> your time... you are incapable of reading comprehension as well. >>>> >>> >>> >>> When starting* sentence with "After" it clues you in that it is a list >>> that requires a comma.* It sounds like you are talking about lamb >>> pancakes* Substitute blueberry and it sounds like you are talking about >>> pancakes with blueberries, not two separate items. >> >>Thank you, Ed. ![]() > >Two stutterers. Just thought to let yoose know that people who read at about the 2nd grade level are not yet capable of reading/comprehending more than one word at a time so are incapable of reading ahead... more skillful readers (4th grade) would have noted the word "are" before clamping down their undeveloped brains. I'm sure when reading to yourselves yoose two mouth the words also Both of you possess the reading ability of someone reading music on their first piano lesson. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/14/2018 1:27 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 8/14/2018 1:20 PM, jmcquown wrote: >> On 8/14/2018 1:03 PM, wrote: >>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:45:04 -0400, jmcquown > >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 8/13/2018 10:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>> On 8/13/2018 9:04 PM, wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>>>>> On 8/13/2018 6:53 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> After lamb pancakes are my least favorite food... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I've never heard of lamb pancakes. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You demonstrate the reading ability of a retarded five year old. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Grammar really isn't your forte, is it?* It should read: "After >>>>>>>>> lamb, >>>>>>>>> pancakes are..." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jill >>>>>> >>>>>> **A comma does NOT belong in >>>>>> my sentence.* With all the reading you claim to do you are wasting >>>>>> your time... you are incapable of reading comprehension as well. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> When starting* sentence with "After" it clues you in that it is a list >>>>> that requires a comma.* It sounds like you are talking about lamb >>>>> pancakes* Substitute blueberry and it sounds like you are talking >>>>> about >>>>> pancakes with blueberries, not two separate items. >>>> >>>> Thank you, Ed. ![]() >>> >>> Two stutterers. >>> >> Admit it, you're wrong.* It's not that difficult. >> >> Jill > > I bet he speaks it with that slight pause represented by a comma.* He > should clarify with his wife that teaches. It's astonishing to me he doesn't understand the simple use of a comma in a sentence. But hey, you and I are both uneducated stutterers... ![]() Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"jmcquown" > wrote in message
... > On 8/14/2018 1:03 PM, wrote: >> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:45:04 -0400, jmcquown > >> wrote: >> >>> On 8/13/2018 10:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>> On 8/13/2018 9:04 PM, wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/13/2018 6:53 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> After lamb pancakes are my least favorite food... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've never heard of lamb pancakes. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You demonstrate the reading ability of a retarded five year old. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Grammar really isn't your forte, is it? It should read: "After >>>>>>>> lamb, >>>>>>>> pancakes are..." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jill >>>>> >>>>> A comma does NOT belong in >>>>> my sentence. With all the reading you claim to do you are wasting >>>>> your time... you are incapable of reading comprehension as well. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> When starting sentence with "After" it clues you in that it is a list >>>> that requires a comma. It sounds like you are talking about lamb >>>> pancakes Substitute blueberry and it sounds like you are talking about >>>> pancakes with blueberries, not two separate items. >>> >>> Thank you, Ed. ![]() >> >> Two stutterers. >> > Admit it, you're wrong. It's not that difficult. > > Jill Yes, and as someone said...when admitting you're wrong, everything before the BUT in the admission is bullshit. ![]() Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 13:20:50 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote: >On 8/14/2018 1:03 PM, wrote: >> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:45:04 -0400, jmcquown > >> wrote: >> >>> On 8/13/2018 10:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>> On 8/13/2018 9:04 PM, wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/13/2018 6:53 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> After lamb pancakes are my least favorite food... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've never heard of lamb pancakes. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You demonstrate the reading ability of a retarded five year old. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Grammar really isn't your forte, is it?* It should read: "After lamb, >>>>>>>> pancakes are..." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jill >>>>> >>>>> *A comma does NOT belong in >>>>> my sentence.* With all the reading you claim to do you are wasting >>>>> your time... you are incapable of reading comprehension as well. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> When starting* sentence with "After" it clues you in that it is a list >>>> that requires a comma.* It sounds like you are talking about lamb >>>> pancakes* Substitute blueberry and it sounds like you are talking about >>>> pancakes with blueberries, not two separate items. >>> >>> Thank you, Ed. ![]() >> >> Two stutterers. >> >Admit it, you're wrong. It's not that difficult. > >Jill Ahahahahahahaha. . . . you can't even construct a full sentence... you write like an immigrant speaking broken English.... it's no wonder you can't read. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 12:46:43 PM UTC-5, Sheldon wrote:
> > Just thought to let yoose know that people who read at about the 2nd > grade level are not yet capable of reading/comprehending more than one > word at a time so are incapable of reading ahead... more skillful > readers (4th grade) would have noted the word "are" before clamping > down their undeveloped brains. I'm sure when reading to yourselves > yoose two mouth the words also Both of you possess the reading > ability of someone reading music on their first piano lesson. > > It doesn't matter how you to try to turn the tables and make people appear as unintelligent when they catch your mistakes. It all falls back on you and your lack of use of commas. The rant above could use a bit of punctuation as well. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/14/2018 1:27 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 8/14/2018 1:20 PM, jmcquown wrote: >> On 8/14/2018 1:03 PM, wrote: >>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:45:04 -0400, jmcquown > >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 8/13/2018 10:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>> On 8/13/2018 9:04 PM, wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>>>>> On 8/13/2018 6:53 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> After lamb pancakes are my least favorite food... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I've never heard of lamb pancakes. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You demonstrate the reading ability of a retarded five year old. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Grammar really isn't your forte, is it?* It should read: "After >>>>>>>>> lamb, >>>>>>>>> pancakes are..." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jill >>>>>> >>>>>> **A comma does NOT belong in >>>>>> my sentence.* With all the reading you claim to do you are wasting >>>>>> your time... you are incapable of reading comprehension as well. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> When starting* sentence with "After" it clues you in that it is a list >>>>> that requires a comma.* It sounds like you are talking about lamb >>>>> pancakes* Substitute blueberry and it sounds like you are talking >>>>> about >>>>> pancakes with blueberries, not two separate items. >>>> >>>> Thank you, Ed. ![]() >>> >>> Two stutterers. >>> >> Admit it, you're wrong.* It's not that difficult. >> >> Jill > > I bet he speaks it with that slight pause represented by a comma.* He > should clarify with his wife that teaches. You should have said he should clarify with his wife "who" teaches. ![]() Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
> wrote in message
... > On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 12:46:43 PM UTC-5, Sheldon wrote: >> >> Just thought to let yoose know that people who read at about the 2nd >> grade level are not yet capable of reading/comprehending more than one >> word at a time so are incapable of reading ahead... more skillful >> readers (4th grade) would have noted the word "are" before clamping >> down their undeveloped brains. I'm sure when reading to yourselves >> yoose two mouth the words also Both of you possess the reading >> ability of someone reading music on their first piano lesson. >> >> > It doesn't matter how you to try to turn the tables and make people > appear as unintelligent when they catch your mistakes. It all falls > back on you and your lack of use of commas. The rant above could use > a bit of punctuation as well. I've always been a great speller with a decent vocabulary, but I am not great with punctuation (especially commas) at all. ![]() Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/14/2018 1:52 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 8/14/2018 1:27 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >> On 8/14/2018 1:20 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>> On 8/14/2018 1:03 PM, wrote: >>>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:45:04 -0400, jmcquown > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 8/13/2018 10:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>>> On 8/13/2018 9:04 PM, wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 8/13/2018 6:53 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> After lamb pancakes are my least favorite food... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've never heard of lamb pancakes. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You demonstrate the reading ability of a retarded five year old. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Grammar really isn't your forte, is it?* It should read: >>>>>>>>>> "After lamb, >>>>>>>>>> pancakes are..." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jill >>>>>>> >>>>>>> **A comma does NOT belong in >>>>>>> my sentence.* With all the reading you claim to do you are wasting >>>>>>> your time... you are incapable of reading comprehension as well. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> When starting* sentence with "After" it clues you in that it is a >>>>>> list >>>>>> that requires a comma.* It sounds like you are talking about lamb >>>>>> pancakes* Substitute blueberry and it sounds like you are talking >>>>>> about >>>>>> pancakes with blueberries, not two separate items. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you, Ed. ![]() >>>> >>>> Two stutterers. >>>> >>> Admit it, you're wrong.* It's not that difficult. >>> >>> Jill >> >> I bet he speaks it with that slight pause represented by a comma.* He >> should clarify with his wife that teaches. > > You should have said he should clarify with his wife "who" teaches. ![]() > > Jill I'd say "I stand corrected" but I'm sitting at the moment. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 12:58:10 PM UTC-5, Cheri wrote:
> > > wrote in message > ... > > > On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 12:46:43 PM UTC-5, Sheldon wrote: > >> > >> Just thought to let yoose know that people who read at about the 2nd > >> grade level are not yet capable of reading/comprehending more than one > >> word at a time so are incapable of reading ahead... more skillful > >> readers (4th grade) would have noted the word "are" before clamping > >> down their undeveloped brains. I'm sure when reading to yourselves > >> yoose two mouth the words also Both of you possess the reading > >> ability of someone reading music on their first piano lesson. > >> > >> > > It doesn't matter how you to try to turn the tables and make people > > appear as unintelligent when they catch your mistakes. It all falls > > back on you and your lack of use of commas. The rant above could use > > a bit of punctuation as well. > > I've always been a great speller with a decent vocabulary, but I am not > great with punctuation (especially commas) at all. ![]() > > Cheri > > Spelling and generally punctuation has always been my strong points. Spell check and grammar check are two handy features to have on the laptop. But math, oh my, let's not go there. I thought I had died and gone to heaven when Texas Instruments introduced the handheld, reasonably priced, calculators back in the '70's. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, says...
> >>>>> On Monday, August 13, 2018 at 9:38:25 AM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I make my own pancake mix but these people even grew wheat for the > >>>>>> flour. Too involved for me. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://imgur.com/gallery/gXd6LXR > Those people were so damn stupid they don't even know what they grew. It's barley, not wheat. https://www.123rf.com/photo_44810455...ated-on-white- background-oats-rye-wheat-barley-.html Janet UK |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 13:27:02 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>On 8/14/2018 1:20 PM, jmcquown wrote: >> On 8/14/2018 1:03 PM, wrote: >>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:45:04 -0400, jmcquown > >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thank you, Ed. ![]() >>> >>> Two stutterers. >>> >> Admit it, you're wrong.* It's not that difficult. >> >> Jill > >I bet he speaks it with that slight pause represented by a comma. He >should clarify with his wife that teaches. who teaches. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 1:52:22 PM UTC-4, wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 12:46:43 PM UTC-5, Sheldon wrote: > > > > Just thought to let yoose know that people who read at about the 2nd > > grade level are not yet capable of reading/comprehending more than one > > word at a time so are incapable of reading ahead... more skillful > > readers (4th grade) would have noted the word "are" before clamping > > down their undeveloped brains. I'm sure when reading to yourselves > > yoose two mouth the words also Both of you possess the reading > > ability of someone reading music on their first piano lesson. > > > > > It doesn't matter how you to try to turn the tables and make people > appear as unintelligent when they catch your mistakes. It all falls > back on you and your lack of use of commas. The rant above could use > a bit of punctuation as well. The post you quoted here is not too bad, but he also needs to learn the use of paragraphs. Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 1:53:07 PM UTC-4, Jill McQuown wrote:
> On 8/14/2018 1:27 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: > > On 8/14/2018 1:20 PM, jmcquown wrote: > >> On 8/14/2018 1:03 PM, wrote: > >>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:45:04 -0400, jmcquown > > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 8/13/2018 10:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: > >>>>> On 8/13/2018 9:04 PM, wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ed Pawlowski wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 8/13/2018 6:53 PM, jmcquown wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> After lamb pancakes are my least favorite food... > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I've never heard of lamb pancakes. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> You demonstrate the reading ability of a retarded five year old. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Grammar really isn't your forte, is it?* It should read: "After > >>>>>>>>> lamb, > >>>>>>>>> pancakes are..." > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Jill > >>>>>> > >>>>>> **A comma does NOT belong in > >>>>>> my sentence.* With all the reading you claim to do you are wasting > >>>>>> your time... you are incapable of reading comprehension as well. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> When starting* sentence with "After" it clues you in that it is a list > >>>>> that requires a comma.* It sounds like you are talking about lamb > >>>>> pancakes* Substitute blueberry and it sounds like you are talking > >>>>> about > >>>>> pancakes with blueberries, not two separate items. > >>>> > >>>> Thank you, Ed. ![]() > >>> > >>> Two stutterers. > >>> > >> Admit it, you're wrong.* It's not that difficult. > >> > >> Jill > > > > I bet he speaks it with that slight pause represented by a comma.* He > > should clarify with his wife that teaches. > > You should have said he should clarify with his wife "who" teaches. ![]() > > Jill Since we're uneducated morons, I believe that would be "his wife whut teaches" Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 1:40:56 PM UTC-5, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 1:52:22 PM UTC-4, wrote: > > > On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 12:46:43 PM UTC-5, Sheldon wrote: > > > > > > Just thought to let yoose know that people who read at about the 2nd > > > grade level are not yet capable of reading/comprehending more than one > > > word at a time so are incapable of reading ahead... more skillful > > > readers (4th grade) would have noted the word "are" before clamping > > > down their undeveloped brains. I'm sure when reading to yourselves > > > yoose two mouth the words also Both of you possess the reading > > > ability of someone reading music on their first piano lesson. > > > > > > > > It doesn't matter how you to try to turn the tables and make people > > appear as unintelligent when they catch your mistakes. It all falls > > back on you and your lack of use of commas. The rant above could use > > a bit of punctuation as well. > > The post you quoted here is not too bad, but he also needs to learn > the use of paragraphs. > > Cindy Hamilton > > You've noticed that too, huh?? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 1:41:38 PM UTC-5, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 1:53:07 PM UTC-4, Jill McQuown wrote: > > > > You should have said he should clarify with his wife "who" teaches. ![]() > > > > Jill > > Since we're uneducated morons, I believe that would be > "his wife whut teaches" > > Cindy Hamilton > > Bwahahahahahaaaaaaaa!! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/14/2018 2:41 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 1:53:07 PM UTC-4, Jill McQuown wrote: >> On 8/14/2018 1:27 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>> On 8/14/2018 1:20 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>> On 8/14/2018 1:03 PM, wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:45:04 -0400, jmcquown > >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 8/13/2018 10:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/13/2018 9:04 PM, wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 8/13/2018 6:53 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> After lamb pancakes are my least favorite food... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've never heard of lamb pancakes. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You demonstrate the reading ability of a retarded five year old. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Grammar really isn't your forte, is it?* It should read: "After >>>>>>>>>>> lamb, >>>>>>>>>>> pancakes are..." >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jill >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> **A comma does NOT belong in >>>>>>>> my sentence.* With all the reading you claim to do you are wasting >>>>>>>> your time... you are incapable of reading comprehension as well. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When starting* sentence with "After" it clues you in that it is a list >>>>>>> that requires a comma.* It sounds like you are talking about lamb >>>>>>> pancakes* Substitute blueberry and it sounds like you are talking >>>>>>> about >>>>>>> pancakes with blueberries, not two separate items. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you, Ed. ![]() >>>>> >>>>> Two stutterers. >>>>> >>>> Admit it, you're wrong.* It's not that difficult. >>>> >>>> Jill >>> >>> I bet he speaks it with that slight pause represented by a comma.* He >>> should clarify with his wife that teaches. >> >> You should have said he should clarify with his wife "who" teaches. ![]() >> >> Jill > > Since we're uneducated morons, I believe that would be > "his wife whut teaches" > > Cindy Hamilton > LOL Cindy! I do think lamb burgers would be good. I keep forgetting to look for ground lamb. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
> wrote in message
... > On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 1:40:56 PM UTC-5, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >> >> On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 1:52:22 PM UTC-4, >> wrote: >> >> > On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 12:46:43 PM UTC-5, Sheldon wrote: >> > > >> > > Just thought to let yoose know that people who read at about the 2nd >> > > grade level are not yet capable of reading/comprehending more than >> > > one >> > > word at a time so are incapable of reading ahead... more skillful >> > > readers (4th grade) would have noted the word "are" before clamping >> > > down their undeveloped brains. I'm sure when reading to yourselves >> > > yoose two mouth the words also Both of you possess the reading >> > > ability of someone reading music on their first piano lesson. >> > > >> > > >> > It doesn't matter how you to try to turn the tables and make people >> > appear as unintelligent when they catch your mistakes. It all falls >> > back on you and your lack of use of commas. The rant above could use >> > a bit of punctuation as well. >> >> The post you quoted here is not too bad, but he also needs to learn >> the use of paragraphs. >> >> Cindy Hamilton >> >> > You've noticed that too, huh?? How could anyone miss his huge walls of texts that hit you in the face like Op Art? ![]() Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/14/2018 3:07 PM, Cheri wrote:
> > wrote in message > ... >> On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 1:40:56 PM UTC-5, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>> >>> On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 1:52:22 PM UTC-4, >>> wrote: >>> >>> > On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 12:46:43 PM UTC-5, Sheldon wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Just thought to let yoose know that people who read at about the 2nd >>> > > grade level are not yet capable of reading/comprehending more >>> than > > one >>> > > word at a time so are incapable of reading ahead... more skillful >>> > > readers (4th grade) would have noted the word "are" before clamping >>> > > down their undeveloped brains.* I'm sure when reading to yourselves >>> > >* yoose two mouth the words also* Both of you possess the reading >>> > > ability of someone reading music on their first piano lesson. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > It doesn't matter how you to try to turn the tables and make people >>> > appear as unintelligent when they catch your mistakes.* It all falls >>> > back on you and your lack of use of commas.* The rant above could use >>> > a bit of punctuation as well. >>> >>> The post you quoted here is not too bad, but he also needs to learn >>> the use of paragraphs. >>> >>> Cindy Hamilton >>> >>> >> You've noticed that too, huh?? > > How could anyone miss his huge walls of texts that hit you in the face > like Op Art? ![]() > > Cheri > > He doesn't seem to know where the Enter key is. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 15:15:34 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote: >On 8/14/2018 3:07 PM, Cheri wrote: >> > wrote in message >> ... >>> On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 1:40:56 PM UTC-5, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>> >>>> The post you quoted here is not too bad, but he also needs to learn >>>> the use of paragraphs. >>>> >>>> Cindy Hamilton >>>> >>>> >>> You've noticed that too, huh?? >> >> How could anyone miss his huge walls of texts that hit you in the face >> like Op Art? ![]() >> >> Cheri >> >> >He doesn't seem to know where the Enter key is. Give him a break. He's a batchler. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 13:03:04 -0400, wrote: > >> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:45:04 -0400, jmcquown > >> wrote: >> >>> On 8/13/2018 10:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>> On 8/13/2018 9:04 PM, wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/13/2018 6:53 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> After lamb pancakes are my least favorite food... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've never heard of lamb pancakes. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You demonstrate the reading ability of a retarded five year old. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Grammar really isn't your forte, is it? It should read: "After lamb, >>>>>>>> pancakes are..." >>>>>>>> Jill > > Are you serious? I no longer believe that you do a lot of yeading. > At the level you've demonstrated you read (Little Golden Books) it > would take you a year to read a copy of National Inquirer and maybe > comprehend half. I'm serious. > >>>>> A comma does NOT belong in >>>>> my sentence. With all the reading you claim to do you are wasting >>>>> your time... you are incapable of reading comprehension as well. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> When starting sentence with "After" it clues you in that it is a list >>>> that requires a comma. It sounds like you are talking about lamb >>>> pancakes Substitute blueberry and it sounds like you are talking about >>>> pancakes with blueberries, not two separate items. >>> >>> Thank you, Ed. ![]() >> >> Two stutterers. > > Just thought to let yoose know that people who read at about the 2nd > grade level are not yet capable of reading/comprehending more than one > word at a time so are incapable of reading ahead... more skillful > readers (4th grade) would have noted the word "are" before clamping > down their undeveloped brains. I'm sure when reading to yourselves > yoose two mouth the words also Both of you possess the reading > ability of someone reading music on their first piano lesson. > Popeye, yoose is talking to yooself now. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Druce wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 15:15:34 -0400, jmcquown > > wrote: > >> On 8/14/2018 3:07 PM, Cheri wrote: >>> > wrote in message >>> ... >>>> On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 1:40:56 PM UTC-5, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The post you quoted here is not too bad, but he also needs to learn >>>>> the use of paragraphs. >>>>> >>>>> Cindy Hamilton >>>>> >>>>> >>>> You've noticed that too, huh?? >>> >>> How could anyone miss his huge walls of texts that hit you in the face >>> like Op Art? ![]() >>> >>> Cheri >>> >>> >> He doesn't seem to know where the Enter key is. > > Give him a break. He's a batchler. > He claims he's married, and even posted a picture of mexican lady, but who knows? Someone said he had claimed to be single for over 10 years before he said he was married for (30 years?). |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 13:20:50 -0400, jmcquown > > wrote: > >> On 8/14/2018 1:03 PM, wrote: >>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:45:04 -0400, jmcquown > >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 8/13/2018 10:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>> On 8/13/2018 9:04 PM, wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>>>>> On 8/13/2018 6:53 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> After lamb pancakes are my least favorite food... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I've never heard of lamb pancakes. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You demonstrate the reading ability of a retarded five year old. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Grammar really isn't your forte, is it? It should read: "After lamb, >>>>>>>>> pancakes are..." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jill >>>>>> >>>>>> A comma does NOT belong in >>>>>> my sentence. With all the reading you claim to do you are wasting >>>>>> your time... you are incapable of reading comprehension as well. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> When starting sentence with "After" it clues you in that it is a list >>>>> that requires a comma. It sounds like you are talking about lamb >>>>> pancakes Substitute blueberry and it sounds like you are talking about >>>>> pancakes with blueberries, not two separate items. >>>> >>>> Thank you, Ed. ![]() >>> >>> Two stutterers. >>> >> Admit it, you're wrong. It's not that difficult. >> >> Jill > > Ahahahahahahaha. . . . you can't even construct a full sentence... > you write like an immigrant speaking broken English.... it's no wonder > you can't read. > Yoose tell 'em Poopeye! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Druce wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 13:27:02 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote: > >> On 8/14/2018 1:20 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>> On 8/14/2018 1:03 PM, wrote: >>>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:45:04 -0400, jmcquown > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thank you, Ed. ![]() >>>> >>>> Two stutterers. >>>> >>> Admit it, you're wrong. It's not that difficult. >>> >>> Jill >> >> I bet he speaks it with that slight pause represented by a comma. He >> should clarify with his wife that teaches. > > who teaches. > LOL, Popeye ranting about grammar ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 15:46:06 -0500, Hank Rogers >
wrote: >Druce wrote: >> On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 15:15:34 -0400, jmcquown > >> wrote: >> >>> On 8/14/2018 3:07 PM, Cheri wrote: >>>> > wrote in message >>>> ... >>>>> On Tuesday, August 14, 2018 at 1:40:56 PM UTC-5, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The post you quoted here is not too bad, but he also needs to learn >>>>>> the use of paragraphs. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cindy Hamilton >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> You've noticed that too, huh?? >>>> >>>> How could anyone miss his huge walls of texts that hit you in the face >>>> like Op Art? ![]() >>>> >>>> Cheri >>>> >>>> >>> He doesn't seem to know where the Enter key is. >> >> Give him a break. He's a batchler. >> > >He claims he's married, and even posted a picture of mexican lady, but >who knows? > >Someone said he had claimed to be single for over 10 years before he >said he was married for (30 years?). I know, but I was referring to his spelling of the word. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2018-08-14 1:48 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 8/14/2018 1:27 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >> I bet he speaks it with that slight pause represented by a comma.* He >> should clarify with his wife that teaches. > > It's astonishing to me he doesn't understand the simple use of a comma > in a sentence.* But hey, you and I are both uneducated stutterers... ![]() I don't find it astonishing. That is too close to being surprising. Having read his posts for many years now I am never surprised at his errors or his attempted defense of them. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 14:05:44 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>On 8/14/2018 1:52 PM, jmcquown wrote: >> On 8/14/2018 1:27 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>> On 8/14/2018 1:20 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>> On 8/14/2018 1:03 PM, wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:45:04 -0400, jmcquown > >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 8/13/2018 10:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/13/2018 9:04 PM, wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 8/13/2018 6:53 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> After lamb pancakes are my least favorite food... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've never heard of lamb pancakes. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You demonstrate the reading ability of a retarded five year old. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Grammar really isn't your forte, is it?* It should read: >>>>>>>>>>> "After lamb, >>>>>>>>>>> pancakes are..." >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jill >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> **A comma does NOT belong in >>>>>>>> my sentence.* With all the reading you claim to do you are wasting >>>>>>>> your time... you are incapable of reading comprehension as well. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When starting* sentence with "After" it clues you in that it is a >>>>>>> list >>>>>>> that requires a comma.* It sounds like you are talking about lamb >>>>>>> pancakes* Substitute blueberry and it sounds like you are talking >>>>>>> about >>>>>>> pancakes with blueberries, not two separate items. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you, Ed. ![]() >>>>> >>>>> Two stutterers. >>>>> >>>> Admit it, you're wrong.* It's not that difficult. >>>> >>>> Jill >>> >>> I bet he speaks it with that slight pause represented by a comma.* He >>> should clarify with his wife that teaches. >> >> You should have said he should clarify with his wife "who" teaches. ![]() >> >> Jill My wife rarely takes an English class, English is not her native tongue, her native tongue is Spanish and various Mayan dialects... and she also teaches Latin because all the way through High School she attended the Cathelic school in Belize and they held classes in Latin. However she is excellent in math, algebra, and trig, but she sucks at geometry, my favorite. Mostly she teaches the math classes and the computer science classes. She takes the regular Latin teacher's classes when he's away, actually she speaks Latin better than him. None of the other teachers, regular and substitutes, can teach Latin. If not for my wife I'd not be at rfc, she's who convinced me and taught me to use a computer. >I'd say "I stand corrected" but I'm sitting at the moment. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Extreme Cuponing | General Cooking | |||
Extreme | Barbecue | |||
Original Pancakes House 49ers Pancakes | Recipes | |||
Original Pancakes House 49ers Pancakes | General Cooking |